Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.electronics.design > #447408

Re: experts aren't

From Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com>
Newsgroups sci.electronics.design
Subject Re: experts aren't
Date 2017-02-12 15:44 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <o7pvsj$1r7$3@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <60nu9c916reeui8gbsj3ddinq2nsok98e5@4ax.com> <6BSnA.2110$X9.171@fx28.iad> <fa7762aa-aa09-49a0-b69c-07e28b739e5f@googlegroups.com> <6783d661-e96c-4175-b12c-3efaa9d0de3d@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 04:45:00 -0800, tabbypurr wrote:
 
> Slowman's simple insistence that all experts belong on pedestals is a
> bit at odds with the world's total experience of experts so far. It
> reminds me of IBM's claimed world need for 5 computers.

Sloman is a fucking idiot. He understands maybe 5% of what he is told, 
then lectures others back on the other 95%. He's been spreading his silly 
old nonsense on this group for at least 18 years to my certain knowledge 
and only very rarely will he ever delve into the subject of electronics, 
which is the *only* field he excels in (so he tells us, anyway). 
If you enjoy long-running, pointless arguments against an opponent who is 
totally impervious to logic and reasoning, then Sloman's the very chap.

Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-11 10:59 -0800
  Re: experts aren't Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2017-02-11 19:14 +0000
    Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-11 11:28 -0800
      Re: experts aren't rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 18:07 -0500
        Re: experts aren't krw@notreal.com - 2017-02-11 18:53 -0500
      Re: experts aren't John Robertson <spam@flippers.com> - 2017-02-11 15:08 -0800
        Re: experts aren't djlocher56@gmail.com - 2017-02-12 14:21 -0800
          Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 16:16 -0800
        Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-12 17:20 -0800
          Re: experts aren't Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2017-02-13 12:50 +0000
          Re: experts aren't Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2017-02-13 13:51 +0000
            Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-13 08:25 -0800
              Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-13 17:16 -0800
          Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-13 06:47 -0800
      Re: experts aren't Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2017-02-11 23:37 +0000
      Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-11 16:49 -0800
      Re: experts aren't whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 17:19 -0800
  Re: experts aren't bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-02-11 17:39 -0500
    Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-11 16:36 -0800
      Re: experts aren't bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-02-12 12:27 -0500
        Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-12 10:52 -0800
          Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 16:30 -0800
        Re: experts aren't Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-02-12 19:28 +0000
          Re: experts aren't Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2017-02-12 11:44 -0800
          Re: experts aren't bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-02-12 15:05 -0500
            Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-12 12:25 -0800
              Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 16:39 -0800
          Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-12 12:23 -0800
      Re: experts aren't bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-02-12 12:40 -0500
  Re: experts aren't Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-02-11 22:59 +0000
    Re: experts aren't rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 18:17 -0500
    Re: experts aren't krw@notreal.com - 2017-02-11 18:54 -0500
      Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-11 17:05 -0800
      Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-11 17:09 -0800
        Re: experts aren't rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 20:33 -0500
        Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-11 18:32 -0800
        Re: experts aren't whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 20:50 -0800
        Re: experts aren't bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-02-12 15:11 -0500
          Re: experts aren't bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-02-12 15:22 -0500
          Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-12 12:32 -0800
            Re: experts aren't bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-02-12 15:44 -0500
              Re: experts aren't bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-02-12 15:47 -0500
                Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-12 13:11 -0800
                Re: experts aren't bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-02-12 16:34 -0500
              Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 17:10 -0800
            Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 16:57 -0800
    Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-11 16:58 -0800
      Re: experts aren't Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-02-12 15:36 +0000
        Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-12 08:36 -0800
          Re: experts aren't Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-02-12 19:44 +0000
            Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-12 12:38 -0800
              Re: experts aren't Julian Barnes <jb9889@notformail.com> - 2017-02-12 23:43 +0000
                Re: experts aren't krw@notreal.com - 2017-02-12 19:24 -0500
                Re: experts aren't Julian Barnes <jb9889@notformail.com> - 2017-02-13 00:53 +0000
                Re: experts aren't krw@notreal.com - 2017-02-12 20:18 -0500
                Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-12 17:27 -0800
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 18:28 -0800
              Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 18:26 -0800
          Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 18:29 -0800
        Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 17:43 -0800
  Re: experts aren't rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 18:02 -0500
  Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-11 16:43 -0800
  Re: experts aren't Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2017-02-11 21:42 -0800
    Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 04:19 -0800
      Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-12 04:45 -0800
        Re: experts aren't Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-02-12 15:44 +0000
          Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-13 01:16 -0800
            Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-13 07:42 -0800
          Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-13 07:39 -0800
        Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 18:02 -0800
          Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-13 01:38 -0800
        Re: experts aren't whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> - 2017-02-12 18:54 -0800
          Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-13 01:45 -0800
            Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-13 07:52 -0800
  Re: experts aren't bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com - 2017-02-12 00:13 -0800
    Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 04:23 -0800
  Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-12 03:56 -0800
    Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 04:33 -0800
      Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-12 04:46 -0800
        Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 18:49 -0800
          Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-13 01:41 -0800
            Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-13 07:55 -0800
              Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-14 01:13 -0800
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-14 03:21 -0800
                Re: experts aren't Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-02-14 22:22 +0000
                Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkinxyxy@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-14 14:48 -0800
                Re: experts aren't George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-02-14 17:09 -0800
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-14 19:22 -0800
                Re: experts aren't whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> - 2017-02-14 17:56 -0800
                Re: experts aren't John Devereux <john@devereux.me.uk> - 2017-02-15 18:05 +0000
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-14 19:21 -0800
                Re: experts aren't "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2017-02-18 21:41 -0500
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-18 19:05 -0800
  Re: experts aren't Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2017-02-14 10:40 +0000
    Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-14 03:42 -0800
      Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-14 04:14 -0800
        Re: experts aren't jurb6006@gmail.com - 2017-02-15 08:56 -0800
          Re: experts aren't John Robertson <spam@flippers.com> - 2017-02-15 10:35 -0800
            Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkinxyxy@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-15 10:46 -0800
              Re: experts aren't George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-02-15 11:38 -0800
              Re: experts aren't John Robertson <spam@flippers.com> - 2017-02-15 12:18 -0800
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-15 15:51 -0800
                Re: experts aren't John Robertson <spam@flippers.com> - 2017-02-15 16:26 -0800
            Re: experts aren't krw@notreal.com - 2017-02-15 20:59 -0500
              Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-15 20:01 -0800
          Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-15 15:43 -0800
            Re: experts aren't John Robertson <spam@flippers.com> - 2017-02-15 16:38 -0800
              Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-15 19:38 -0800
                Re: experts aren't Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-02-17 21:25 +0000
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-17 21:47 -0800
                Re: experts aren't Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-02-18 12:49 +0000
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-18 05:13 -0800
                Re: experts aren't Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-02-18 22:39 +0000
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-18 18:12 -0800
                Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-18 11:43 -0800
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-18 17:52 -0800
            Re: experts aren't Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-02-17 21:17 +0000
              Re: experts aren't M Philbrook <jamie_ka1lpa@charter.net> - 2017-02-18 16:46 -0500
              Re: experts aren't Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2017-02-19 05:35 +0000
                Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-19 02:15 -0800
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-19 03:28 -0800
                Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-19 03:31 -0800
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-19 09:23 -0800
                Re: experts aren't Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-02-20 00:31 +0000
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-19 17:31 -0800
        Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-17 13:43 -0800
    Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-14 07:08 -0800
      Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-14 20:07 -0800

csiph-web