Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.electronics.design > #447323

Re: experts aren't

From Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com>
Newsgroups sci.electronics.design
Subject Re: experts aren't
Date 2017-02-11 22:59 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <o7o51c$7vm$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <60nu9c916reeui8gbsj3ddinq2nsok98e5@4ax.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 10:59:57 -0800, John Larkin wrote:

> and, he notes modestly, my general theory that, except in the rare
> fields of study that are subject to proof by experiment, most experts
> are usually wrong, and most experts are even wronger than the average
> truck driver, and more expertise makes them yet wronger.

For sure economists are notorious for making totally inaccurate 
predictions; financial pundits in general are, in fact usually wrong, 
especially the further out they're attempting to see. The joke is they 
have the chutzpah to assume no one will notice and they can get away with 
their old nonsense again and again and again.

Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-11 10:59 -0800
  Re: experts aren't Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2017-02-11 19:14 +0000
    Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-11 11:28 -0800
      Re: experts aren't rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 18:07 -0500
        Re: experts aren't krw@notreal.com - 2017-02-11 18:53 -0500
      Re: experts aren't John Robertson <spam@flippers.com> - 2017-02-11 15:08 -0800
        Re: experts aren't djlocher56@gmail.com - 2017-02-12 14:21 -0800
          Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 16:16 -0800
        Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-12 17:20 -0800
          Re: experts aren't Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2017-02-13 12:50 +0000
          Re: experts aren't Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2017-02-13 13:51 +0000
            Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-13 08:25 -0800
              Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-13 17:16 -0800
          Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-13 06:47 -0800
      Re: experts aren't Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2017-02-11 23:37 +0000
      Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-11 16:49 -0800
      Re: experts aren't whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 17:19 -0800
  Re: experts aren't bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-02-11 17:39 -0500
    Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-11 16:36 -0800
      Re: experts aren't bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-02-12 12:27 -0500
        Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-12 10:52 -0800
          Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 16:30 -0800
        Re: experts aren't Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-02-12 19:28 +0000
          Re: experts aren't Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2017-02-12 11:44 -0800
          Re: experts aren't bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-02-12 15:05 -0500
            Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-12 12:25 -0800
              Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 16:39 -0800
          Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-12 12:23 -0800
      Re: experts aren't bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-02-12 12:40 -0500
  Re: experts aren't Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-02-11 22:59 +0000
    Re: experts aren't rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 18:17 -0500
    Re: experts aren't krw@notreal.com - 2017-02-11 18:54 -0500
      Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-11 17:05 -0800
      Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-11 17:09 -0800
        Re: experts aren't rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 20:33 -0500
        Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-11 18:32 -0800
        Re: experts aren't whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 20:50 -0800
        Re: experts aren't bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-02-12 15:11 -0500
          Re: experts aren't bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-02-12 15:22 -0500
          Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-12 12:32 -0800
            Re: experts aren't bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-02-12 15:44 -0500
              Re: experts aren't bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-02-12 15:47 -0500
                Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-12 13:11 -0800
                Re: experts aren't bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-02-12 16:34 -0500
              Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 17:10 -0800
            Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 16:57 -0800
    Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-11 16:58 -0800
      Re: experts aren't Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-02-12 15:36 +0000
        Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-12 08:36 -0800
          Re: experts aren't Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-02-12 19:44 +0000
            Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-12 12:38 -0800
              Re: experts aren't Julian Barnes <jb9889@notformail.com> - 2017-02-12 23:43 +0000
                Re: experts aren't krw@notreal.com - 2017-02-12 19:24 -0500
                Re: experts aren't Julian Barnes <jb9889@notformail.com> - 2017-02-13 00:53 +0000
                Re: experts aren't krw@notreal.com - 2017-02-12 20:18 -0500
                Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-12 17:27 -0800
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 18:28 -0800
              Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 18:26 -0800
          Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 18:29 -0800
        Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 17:43 -0800
  Re: experts aren't rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 18:02 -0500
  Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-11 16:43 -0800
  Re: experts aren't Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2017-02-11 21:42 -0800
    Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 04:19 -0800
      Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-12 04:45 -0800
        Re: experts aren't Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-02-12 15:44 +0000
          Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-13 01:16 -0800
            Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-13 07:42 -0800
          Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-13 07:39 -0800
        Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 18:02 -0800
          Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-13 01:38 -0800
        Re: experts aren't whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> - 2017-02-12 18:54 -0800
          Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-13 01:45 -0800
            Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-13 07:52 -0800
  Re: experts aren't bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com - 2017-02-12 00:13 -0800
    Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 04:23 -0800
  Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-12 03:56 -0800
    Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 04:33 -0800
      Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-12 04:46 -0800
        Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 18:49 -0800
          Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-13 01:41 -0800
            Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-13 07:55 -0800
              Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-14 01:13 -0800
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-14 03:21 -0800
                Re: experts aren't Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-02-14 22:22 +0000
                Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkinxyxy@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-14 14:48 -0800
                Re: experts aren't George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-02-14 17:09 -0800
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-14 19:22 -0800
                Re: experts aren't whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> - 2017-02-14 17:56 -0800
                Re: experts aren't John Devereux <john@devereux.me.uk> - 2017-02-15 18:05 +0000
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-14 19:21 -0800
                Re: experts aren't "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2017-02-18 21:41 -0500
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-18 19:05 -0800
  Re: experts aren't Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2017-02-14 10:40 +0000
    Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-14 03:42 -0800
      Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-14 04:14 -0800
        Re: experts aren't jurb6006@gmail.com - 2017-02-15 08:56 -0800
          Re: experts aren't John Robertson <spam@flippers.com> - 2017-02-15 10:35 -0800
            Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkinxyxy@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-15 10:46 -0800
              Re: experts aren't George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-02-15 11:38 -0800
              Re: experts aren't John Robertson <spam@flippers.com> - 2017-02-15 12:18 -0800
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-15 15:51 -0800
                Re: experts aren't John Robertson <spam@flippers.com> - 2017-02-15 16:26 -0800
            Re: experts aren't krw@notreal.com - 2017-02-15 20:59 -0500
              Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-15 20:01 -0800
          Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-15 15:43 -0800
            Re: experts aren't John Robertson <spam@flippers.com> - 2017-02-15 16:38 -0800
              Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-15 19:38 -0800
                Re: experts aren't Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-02-17 21:25 +0000
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-17 21:47 -0800
                Re: experts aren't Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-02-18 12:49 +0000
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-18 05:13 -0800
                Re: experts aren't Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-02-18 22:39 +0000
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-18 18:12 -0800
                Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-18 11:43 -0800
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-18 17:52 -0800
            Re: experts aren't Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-02-17 21:17 +0000
              Re: experts aren't M Philbrook <jamie_ka1lpa@charter.net> - 2017-02-18 16:46 -0500
              Re: experts aren't Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2017-02-19 05:35 +0000
                Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-19 02:15 -0800
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-19 03:28 -0800
                Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-19 03:31 -0800
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-19 09:23 -0800
                Re: experts aren't Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-02-20 00:31 +0000
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-19 17:31 -0800
        Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-17 13:43 -0800
    Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-14 07:08 -0800
      Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-14 20:07 -0800

csiph-web