Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #90934

Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom

From Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom
Date 2016-07-25 02:11 +0100
Organization Origin Sonata
Message-ID <nn3p0e$8on$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (18 earlier) <nn3bqq$4ps$1@jstuckle.eternal-september.org> <nn3dlt$a4v$1@dont-email.me> <nn3est$ge2$1@jstuckle.eternal-september.org> <nn3gd7$kp0$1@dont-email.me> <nn3o53$6ca$1@jstuckle.eternal-september.org>

Show all headers | View raw

On 25/07/16 01:57, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> On 7/24/2016 6:44 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>> On 24/07/16 23:19, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>> On 7/24/2016 5:58 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>>>> On 24/07/16 22:27, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>>> On 7/24/2016 11:32 AM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>>>>>> On 24/07/16 16:06, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
<snip>
>>>>>>> And no, sizeof (short) > sizeof (int) is not permitted.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's not forbidden. What is forbidden is for SHRT_MAX to exceed
>>>>>> INT_MAX
>>>>>> (see 6.2.5(8), which says the same thing in different words).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is, for example, legal (albeit rather daft) for int to be 16 bits
>>>>>> (with no padding) and short to be 24 bits (with 8 bits of padding).
<snip>
>>
>> The Standard allows padding bits in unsigned (6.2.6.2(1)) and signed
>> (6.2.6.2(2)) integer types. ISO could easily have defined the
>> relationship of integer types by size including padding, but it chose
>> instead to define that relationship in terms of ranks and value ranges.
>>
>
> It also does not say you can pad BYTES.

The Standard allows padding bits in unsigned (6.2.6.2(1)) and signed
(6.2.6.2(2)) integer types. ISO could easily have defined the
relationship of integer types by size including padding, but it chose
instead to define that relationship in terms of ranks and value ranges.

Which bit of this don't you understand?

>> Now, your claim is that sizeof(short) cannot exceed sizeof(int) - that
>> it is *not permitted*. I have shown why I think it /is/ permitted. What
>> you have not done is shown why you think it isn't.
>
> No, the only thing you have shown is an incorrect interpretation.

I presume you mean it's an interpretation that disagrees with yours. But 
no, it's not incorrect.

>>>> That is, it doesn't matter either way. It's perfectly possible and legal
>>>> for sizeof(short) to exceed sizeof(int). What is /not/ legal is for
>>>> SHRT_MAX to exceed INT_MAX.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Again, citation?  Where does it say sizeof(short) can exceed sizeof(int)?
>>
>> The Standard allows padding bits in unsigned (6.2.6.2(1)) and signed
>> (6.2.6.2(2)) integer types. ISO could easily have defined the
>> relationship of integer types by size including padding, but it chose
>> instead to define that relationship in terms of ranks and value ranges.
>>
>
> And where does it say you can pad BYTES?

It's a silly question. Implementations may use as many padding bits as 
they like in integer types, and they are under no obligation to ensure 
that that padding results in the integer sizes obeying any kind of 
relational ordering. The /range/ of short must not exceed the /range/ of 
int, but there's no such limitation on /size/.

More to the point, where does it say sizeof(short) must not exceed 
sizeof(int)? That was your claim, that was the claim I was gainsaying, 
and you have yet to provide even a shred of evidence to support it.

<nonsense snipped>

-- 
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-07-19 15:30 -0700
  Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Udyant Wig <udyant.wig@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 09:51 +0530
    Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2016-07-20 00:07 -0500
      Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-20 01:11 -0700
        Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-20 10:09 +0100
          Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-20 02:27 -0700
            Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-20 10:44 +0100
              Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-20 03:01 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-20 11:17 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-20 04:19 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-20 12:29 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-20 04:51 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-20 13:01 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-20 05:43 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-20 15:48 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-07-20 08:20 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-20 16:31 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-07-20 08:49 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom "James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2016-07-20 13:00 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-20 18:23 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-20 14:17 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-20 06:29 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-20 15:51 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-21 01:41 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-21 02:05 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-07-20 19:57 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-21 10:14 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Rosario19 <Ros@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-21 11:20 +0200
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-21 02:32 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-21 11:09 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-07-21 16:08 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-21 17:04 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-21 19:19 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-07-21 09:44 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-07-20 09:05 -0700
                Size augments for legacy code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 07:22 -0700
            Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-20 11:10 +0100
            Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom John Bode <jfbode1029@gmail.com> - 2016-08-04 13:07 -0700
              Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-08-04 14:02 -0700
              Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-08-04 22:14 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-08-04 14:28 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom John Bode <jfbode1029@gmail.com> - 2016-08-04 15:58 -0700
              Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-08-04 23:29 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom John Bode <jfbode1029@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 08:21 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-08-05 08:38 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-08-05 09:32 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-08-05 10:30 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-08-05 19:01 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom crisd <crisdunbar@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 11:33 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom John Bode <jfbode1029@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 12:01 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-08-05 12:07 -0700
        Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-07-20 09:09 -0700
          Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-20 12:00 -0700
            Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-20 20:25 +0100
              Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 20:38 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2016-07-20 20:03 +0000
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 22:31 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-07-20 14:42 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 23:21 +0100
              Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-20 20:49 +0100
            Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-07-20 12:29 -0700
              Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-20 13:03 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-07-20 16:55 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-20 21:40 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-21 07:16 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-07-21 09:47 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2016-07-23 09:37 +0000
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-23 03:23 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2016-07-23 19:47 +0000
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-23 13:38 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-23 17:53 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-07-24 01:52 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-24 11:06 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-24 16:32 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-24 17:27 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-24 22:58 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-24 18:19 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-24 23:44 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-24 20:57 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-25 02:11 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-24 22:12 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2016-07-24 17:28 -0600
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-25 00:37 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-24 16:59 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2016-07-24 19:32 -0600
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-25 02:35 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-24 22:14 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-24 22:13 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2016-07-24 21:54 -0600
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-25 08:08 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-25 13:09 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-25 08:22 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-25 13:50 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-25 11:48 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-25 17:32 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-25 12:41 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2016-07-25 16:35 +0000
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-25 17:50 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-25 14:57 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-07-24 19:01 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-24 22:14 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-24 20:58 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-25 02:14 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-24 22:16 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2016-07-24 19:35 -0600
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2016-07-24 09:38 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom "James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2016-07-24 12:58 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-24 17:28 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-24 23:01 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-24 15:13 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-24 18:20 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-24 23:46 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-24 20:59 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-25 02:21 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-24 22:17 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-25 03:34 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-25 08:09 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-25 13:21 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-25 11:50 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-25 17:38 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-25 14:59 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-25 05:28 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-25 11:52 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-25 08:59 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-25 12:29 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-25 09:39 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-25 15:00 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-07-24 19:09 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-24 22:19 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-25 03:31 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-07-24 21:20 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-25 08:10 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-25 08:12 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2016-07-27 09:09 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-07-27 09:57 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2016-07-28 11:15 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-07-28 15:18 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2016-07-30 11:59 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-28 21:02 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2016-07-30 12:09 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-07-31 14:07 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2016-07-31 16:56 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-08-01 08:57 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-07-27 11:41 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2016-07-28 11:25 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2016-07-24 15:28 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-24 21:00 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-25 02:31 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-24 22:21 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2016-07-24 19:38 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-24 20:18 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-25 08:15 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2016-07-25 07:31 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-25 11:59 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2016-07-25 10:31 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-25 18:57 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-25 15:04 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-07-24 19:14 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2016-07-24 22:49 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-07-24 21:12 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2016-07-24 21:58 -0600
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-25 08:19 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2016-07-25 08:34 -0600
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-25 12:01 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2016-07-25 08:32 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-25 12:03 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-07-25 00:24 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-24 21:01 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2016-07-25 17:08 +1200
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-25 08:19 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-07-25 17:07 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-25 12:36 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2016-07-25 10:34 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-25 15:05 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2016-07-25 12:18 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-25 16:05 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-07-26 01:08 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-26 12:29 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-07-26 09:41 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-07-26 10:50 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2016-07-26 18:09 +0000
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-26 14:43 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-07-26 20:25 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-26 15:33 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-26 21:05 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-26 16:37 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2016-07-26 13:23 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-26 16:39 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-07-26 14:07 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2016-07-26 14:51 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2016-07-26 15:17 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-26 23:26 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-26 20:46 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-27 07:52 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-27 08:47 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-07-27 17:13 +0200
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-27 12:03 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2016-07-27 09:57 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-27 16:18 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2016-07-27 07:58 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-27 12:05 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-27 17:18 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-27 16:20 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-28 07:14 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-07-28 08:59 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-28 13:37 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2016-07-27 09:42 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-27 16:20 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2016-07-26 15:31 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-26 23:32 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-27 07:58 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-27 08:52 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-27 11:21 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-27 13:34 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-07-27 16:31 +0200
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-07-27 16:20 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-27 23:36 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-07-28 14:51 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-28 09:26 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2016-07-28 10:54 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-07-27 03:12 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-26 23:35 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-26 20:41 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2016-07-27 15:04 +0000
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-07-27 16:05 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-27 08:17 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-07-27 09:21 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-27 09:37 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-07-27 10:11 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-27 10:21 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-07-27 11:34 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 14:46 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-07-27 22:29 +0200
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-07-27 20:32 +0200
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-28 00:22 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-07-28 13:01 +0200
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-28 04:46 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-07-26 12:57 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom "James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2016-07-26 16:00 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-24 00:08 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2016-07-27 14:58 +0000
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-07-27 09:14 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-07-27 11:55 -0700
            Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2016-07-20 19:47 +0000
              Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-20 13:09 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2016-07-20 20:49 +0000
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-20 14:35 -0700
      Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-07-20 09:01 -0700
    Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-07-20 08:59 -0700
  Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2016-07-20 09:24 -0700
    Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-07-20 11:28 -0700
      Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2016-07-21 18:38 -0700
  Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Rosario19 <Ros@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-20 22:10 +0200
  Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Anand Hariharan <mailto.anand.hariharan@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 16:16 -0700
    Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-07-20 19:56 -0700
    Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Udyant Wig <udyant.wig@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 18:46 +0530
      Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2016-07-21 17:20 +0000
        Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Udyant Wig <udyant.wig@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 18:03 +0530
      Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2016-07-21 15:39 -0400
        Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Udyant Wig <udyant.wig@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 18:04 +0530
          Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2016-07-22 13:44 -0400
            Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Udyant Wig <udyant.wig@gmail.com> - 2016-07-23 15:38 +0530
        Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Udyant Wig <udyant.wig@gmail.com> - 2016-07-23 15:36 +0530
          Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom "James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2016-07-23 13:08 -0400
            Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-07-23 13:23 -0700
          Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-23 19:57 +0100
          Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-07-23 13:03 -0700
            Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2016-07-24 08:06 -0700
              Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-07-24 14:17 -0700
      Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2016-07-21 19:45 -0700
        Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-22 13:13 +0100
    Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2016-07-21 19:23 -0700
      Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-21 20:02 -0700
        Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-22 07:57 +0100
          Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-22 00:18 -0700
            Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-22 08:20 +0100
              Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-22 00:49 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-22 09:31 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-22 10:22 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-22 12:21 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-22 17:15 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-23 19:46 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-07-22 16:43 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-07-22 09:17 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-22 18:21 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-07-22 11:05 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-22 22:38 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2016-07-22 13:58 -0400
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-07-22 11:14 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-22 02:23 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-22 12:23 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-22 06:44 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-07-22 09:18 -0700
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-22 17:00 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-23 19:48 +0100
          Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-22 10:08 +0100
            Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-22 10:26 +0100
            Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-22 12:12 +0100
              Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-22 12:35 +0100
                Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-22 14:47 +0100
        Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2016-07-25 09:37 -0700
          Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-25 09:50 -0700
            Re: A glitch regarding the usual malloc() idiom Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2016-07-28 11:40 -0700

csiph-web