Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons

From	Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons
Date	2016-05-23 11:33 -0500
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<nhvbcu$cl6$5@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<92afb24a-cf1c-49b3-8e6d-3bdd2fa2b491@googlegroups.com> <nhtdpu$d9i$2@pcls7.std.com> <49acbdca-ca12-4d00-9c7e-194e9bc51134@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 5/22/2016 6:20 PM, john wrote:
> Michael
> Don't the laws of Physics all change
> at the Quantum level?

No. What gave you that idea?

> According to QM?

Nope, QM says no such thing.
What comic book did you get that from?

> So am I violating changed laws
> or unchanged laws?
> Brain dead physicists.
>


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Thread

Free electrons versus bound electrons john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 06:39 -0700
  Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 16:16 +0200
  Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons omnilobe@gmail.com - 2016-05-22 07:58 -0700
    Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 17:36 +0200
      Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-05-22 15:05 -0500
        Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 15:03 -0700
          Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-05-22 18:00 -0500
            Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-22 19:45 -0700
        Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-22 19:46 -0700
          Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons "Anon E. Mouse" <nobody@home.com> - 2016-05-23 00:40 -0400
            Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-22 22:19 -0700
    Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 08:44 -0700
      Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 08:52 -0700
        Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-22 16:17 -0400
          Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 15:09 -0700
            Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 16:16 -0700
              Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 16:38 -0700
                Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-23 00:45 -0400
            Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-23 00:39 -0400
              Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 23:14 -0700
                Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-23 08:10 -0400
                Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 06:37 -0700
                Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-23 21:05 -0400
    Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons Mikkel Haaheim <mikkelhaaheim@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 00:20 -0700
      Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-23 15:55 +0000
        Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 09:13 -0700
        Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons omnilobe@gmail.com - 2016-05-23 09:29 -0700
          Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-23 17:17 +0000
            Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons omnilobe@gmail.com - 2016-05-23 15:41 -0700
              Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-24 02:11 +0000
                Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons omnilobe@gmail.com - 2016-05-23 20:48 -0700
        Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons Mikkel Haaheim <mikkelhaaheim@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 13:59 -0700
          Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-23 22:02 +0000
    Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 21:10 -0700
  Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-22 23:02 +0000
    Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 16:20 -0700
      Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-23 04:01 +0000
      Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 11:33 -0500
        Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 09:40 -0700
          Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-23 21:23 -0400
  Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons Mikkel Haaheim <mikkelhaaheim@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 00:22 -0700
  Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 11:27 -0500
  Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 12:00 -0700
    Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-05-24 13:01 -0700
      Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 01:20 -0700
      Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-05-29 13:55 -0700

csiph-web