Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #579680
| From | "Anon E. Mouse" <nobody@home.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons |
| Date | 2016-05-23 00:40 -0400 |
| Organization | None |
| Message-ID | <nhu1ec$7cd$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <92afb24a-cf1c-49b3-8e6d-3bdd2fa2b491@googlegroups.com> <b59a073e-a5c9-495e-a81f-be4f4ad59e31@googlegroups.com> <nhsjf7$frk$1@dont-email.me> <1t8nksp2ls13x$.hxzg4q5vsd8b$.dlg@40tude.net> <nhtqv7$2stl$1@adenine.netfront.net> |
Oh no, looks like Haha Hanson is still horny. He is still writing about his fantasy of laying himself under Bert's sphincter and opening wide.. then doing the same with a gay black Muslim. Followed by Relf. Then off to vandalize a graveyard, where he fantasizes about lying in his grave with everyone pissing on it, and the piss seeping onto his face. Hanson keeps posting that selfie of himself and his boyfriend with Hanson "opening wide"... Now he wants to watch Relf masturbate to ejaculation and then he wants to "irritate" Relf's prostate. At least he also states pussy is the last thing he wants, so at least the womenfolk are safe. You can tell how hanson is totally obsessed with all this as he posts it over and over and over again... When will the guys in the clean white suits and the giant butterfly nets come for Hanson and put him where he belongs?
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Free electrons versus bound electrons john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 06:39 -0700
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 16:16 +0200
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons omnilobe@gmail.com - 2016-05-22 07:58 -0700
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 17:36 +0200
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-05-22 15:05 -0500
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 15:03 -0700
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-05-22 18:00 -0500
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-22 19:45 -0700
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-22 19:46 -0700
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons "Anon E. Mouse" <nobody@home.com> - 2016-05-23 00:40 -0400
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-22 22:19 -0700
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 08:44 -0700
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 08:52 -0700
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-22 16:17 -0400
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 15:09 -0700
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 16:16 -0700
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 16:38 -0700
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-23 00:45 -0400
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-23 00:39 -0400
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 23:14 -0700
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-23 08:10 -0400
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 06:37 -0700
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-23 21:05 -0400
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons Mikkel Haaheim <mikkelhaaheim@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 00:20 -0700
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-23 15:55 +0000
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 09:13 -0700
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons omnilobe@gmail.com - 2016-05-23 09:29 -0700
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-23 17:17 +0000
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons omnilobe@gmail.com - 2016-05-23 15:41 -0700
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-24 02:11 +0000
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons omnilobe@gmail.com - 2016-05-23 20:48 -0700
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons Mikkel Haaheim <mikkelhaaheim@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 13:59 -0700
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-23 22:02 +0000
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 21:10 -0700
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-22 23:02 +0000
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 16:20 -0700
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-23 04:01 +0000
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 11:33 -0500
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 09:40 -0700
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-23 21:23 -0400
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons Mikkel Haaheim <mikkelhaaheim@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 00:22 -0700
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 11:27 -0500
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 12:00 -0700
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-05-24 13:01 -0700
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 01:20 -0700
Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-05-29 13:55 -0700
csiph-web