Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons

From	moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons
Date	2016-05-23 04:01 +0000
Organization	The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Message-ID	<nhtvb2$35k$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink)
References	<92afb24a-cf1c-49b3-8e6d-3bdd2fa2b491@googlegroups.com> <nhtdpu$d9i$2@pcls7.std.com> <49acbdca-ca12-4d00-9c7e-194e9bc51134@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>Michael
>Don't the laws of Physics all change
>at the Quantum level?
>According to QM?

QM violates many ideas considered common sense in the macroscopic world,
but the fundamental concepts such as conservation of momentum and so forth
which you gladly violate hold true.

>So am I violating changed laws
>or unchanged laws?
>Brain dead physicists.

Your feeble justification of "if they can do it, so can I" has been noted,
and laughed at. [especially since "they" don't do it]

Thread

Free electrons versus bound electrons john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 06:39 -0700
  Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 16:16 +0200
  Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons omnilobe@gmail.com - 2016-05-22 07:58 -0700
    Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 17:36 +0200
      Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-05-22 15:05 -0500
        Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 15:03 -0700
          Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-05-22 18:00 -0500
            Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-22 19:45 -0700
        Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-22 19:46 -0700
          Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons "Anon E. Mouse" <nobody@home.com> - 2016-05-23 00:40 -0400
            Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-22 22:19 -0700
    Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 08:44 -0700
      Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 08:52 -0700
        Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-22 16:17 -0400
          Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 15:09 -0700
            Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 16:16 -0700
              Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 16:38 -0700
                Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-23 00:45 -0400
            Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-23 00:39 -0400
              Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 23:14 -0700
                Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-23 08:10 -0400
                Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 06:37 -0700
                Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-23 21:05 -0400
    Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons Mikkel Haaheim <mikkelhaaheim@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 00:20 -0700
      Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-23 15:55 +0000
        Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 09:13 -0700
        Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons omnilobe@gmail.com - 2016-05-23 09:29 -0700
          Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-23 17:17 +0000
            Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons omnilobe@gmail.com - 2016-05-23 15:41 -0700
              Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-24 02:11 +0000
                Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons omnilobe@gmail.com - 2016-05-23 20:48 -0700
        Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons Mikkel Haaheim <mikkelhaaheim@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 13:59 -0700
          Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-23 22:02 +0000
    Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 21:10 -0700
  Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-22 23:02 +0000
    Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 16:20 -0700
      Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-23 04:01 +0000
      Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 11:33 -0500
        Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 09:40 -0700
          Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-23 21:23 -0400
  Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons Mikkel Haaheim <mikkelhaaheim@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 00:22 -0700
  Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 11:27 -0500
  Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 12:00 -0700
    Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-05-24 13:01 -0700
      Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 01:20 -0700
      Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-05-29 13:55 -0700

csiph-web