Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct

From	glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct
Date	2015-10-17 00:03 +0000
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<mvs393$rps$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(6 earlier) <lnd1wf7t37.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <839bc0ff-6090-4171-956b-10cd0db49129@googlegroups.com> <ln8u737njv.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <a6485b2d-c8df-429c-a5bf-3eafe0885966@googlegroups.com> <lnvba66ced.fsf@kst-u.example.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> wrote:
> supercat@casperkitty.com writes:
(snip)
>> In all systems, conversion of a negative value to an unsigined value of the
>> same type yields the value which, when adding the inverse of that negative
>> value, yields the original.  In other words, signed-to-unsigned conversions
>> are specified in a fashion independent of representation.

>> In a two's-complement system, this conversion is representation-preserving.
>> In other systems, it is not.
 
> Just look at how much reasoning you have to do, and how many assumptions
> you have to make, to determine (not entirely accurately) that sequences
> of plain char are the best way to talk about object representations.
> Is it *really* just to avoid having to type "unsigned "?
 
>> In C as envisioned by K&R, there was no question but that every object
>> had a unique representation in "char" because there *was* no "unsigned
>> char".  C89 relaxed this by allowing for the possibility of implementations
>> where "char" as a signed type with a non-two's-complement representation
>> but I don't know whether any such platforms existed.  If none have ever
>> existed, I don't see much point in continuing to allow for them.
 
> When K&R1 was written, there were more 1's-complement machines in
> production use than there are now.  I don't remember whether the
> book mentions any such machines; I'll check later today.

The four that I see are all twos complement, including the rare today
Honeywell 6000. 

The CDC 60 bit machines were somewhat popular in the K&R years, 
and are ones complement. The usual character set uses six bits per
character, though I believe that there is a set with mixed six and 12
bit characters. I have never used a C compiler on these machines.

Unisys still builds and sells ones complement machines, and I believe
has a C compiler. It might be that the compiler does not properly handle
the unsigned types in C.
 
> In any case, unsigned char exists, and has existed for at least
> 26 years.  The language has changed since 1978, and at least some
> of the changes were made for good reasons.  The fact that pre-ANSI
> C didn't have unsigned char is no reason not to use it now.

(snip)

> I don't
> think that C programmers in general avoid typing unsigned char,
> which was the specific claim you made.  I certainly don't.

When I am writing a program for one-time use, on a machine where I 
know it won't cause problems, I might forget to type unsigned.
But when I want to cast for arguments to memcpy(), I always
remember it.
 
> Regardless of what the standard does or doesn't say, isn't it easier
> to reason about object representations if you don't have to worry
> about signed values?  Each byte of an object's representation is a
> sequence of 8 (more generally CHAR_BIT) bits, which can be viewed as
> a number in the range 0 to 255 (more generally 2**CHAR_BIT-1).  What
> conceptual benefit do you see in using a type that, even assuming
> 2's-complement, can have a range of *either* 0.255 *or* -128..+127?
> Why waste time worrying about signed values when it's completely
> unnecessary, and when using an unsigned type is conceptually simpler?
 
> Would your position be the same if C had made "byte" a keyword
> equivalent to or replacing "unsigned char"?

By the way, Java has a signed 8 bit (byte), and unsigned 16 bit
(char) type.

I believe that some DEC Fortran compilers have a non-standard signed
byte type.

-- glen

Thread

Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-09-29 09:49 -0700
  Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct wssimms@gmail.com - 2015-09-30 21:18 -0700
    Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-01 09:35 -0700
      Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 09:41 -0700
        Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2015-10-01 18:34 +0000
          Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 12:02 -0700
    Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-10-02 13:03 +0000
      Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 06:20 -0700
        Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-02 16:07 +0100
          Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 08:46 -0700
            Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-02 17:28 +0100
              Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 10:30 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-02 20:32 +0100
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 12:58 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-02 22:06 +0100
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 09:31 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-03 14:31 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 09:27 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-03 20:36 +0100
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 13:00 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-03 23:37 +0100
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 17:07 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-03 17:42 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 17:49 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-10-03 23:28 -0400
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-04 00:10 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-04 13:24 +0100
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-04 14:07 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-04 14:40 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-04 18:04 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-04 20:10 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-04 22:15 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-05 08:53 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-06 08:45 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-06 12:34 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-06 17:16 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-06 21:47 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-07 11:05 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-07 11:47 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-07 13:50 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-07 18:10 -0400
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-07 16:10 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-07 16:33 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-08 09:08 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-08 10:43 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-08 11:50 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-08 12:19 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-07 15:32 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-07 16:21 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-08 08:54 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-08 11:15 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-08 12:38 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-08 13:30 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-08 14:15 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-08 14:53 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-08 15:23 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-08 17:24 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-09 08:02 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-09 09:02 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-09 12:43 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-09 14:21 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-09 15:14 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-13 18:37 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Martin Shobe <martin.shobe@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-07 20:56 -0500
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-07 19:41 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-07 23:15 -0400
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-10-14 10:05 +0000
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-10-14 11:23 +0100
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-14 08:24 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-10-16 11:12 +0000
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 21:55 +0100
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2015-10-16 22:08 -0500
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-14 11:44 -0400
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-14 11:12 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-10-07 10:34 +0000
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-07 07:23 -0400
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-07 09:53 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-10-14 10:13 +0000
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-14 11:36 -0400
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-04 13:35 +0100
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 06:23 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-04 15:34 +0100
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 08:07 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-04 14:42 +0000
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-10-04 15:37 +0000
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-05 00:33 +0100
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-10-14 10:20 +0000
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-14 13:55 +0100
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-04 22:06 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-10-14 10:30 +0000
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-14 08:39 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-14 23:47 +0000
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-15 10:20 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-15 11:10 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-15 12:11 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-15 12:35 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-15 13:52 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-15 14:35 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-15 15:51 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-16 06:48 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-16 08:50 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-16 10:06 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-16 12:45 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-16 13:56 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-16 14:29 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-16 14:52 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-16 15:32 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-16 15:59 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-17 00:03 +0000
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-17 00:08 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-17 15:26 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-17 16:38 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-16 23:43 +0000
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-16 23:57 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-17 14:50 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-18 10:55 +1300
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-17 18:24 -0400
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-10-17 18:39 -0400
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-17 18:56 -0400
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-17 16:17 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-18 11:46 -0400
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-10-17 19:44 -0400
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-17 16:48 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-10-18 01:14 +0100
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-10-17 20:22 -0400
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-17 17:26 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-10-18 01:44 +0100
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-17 20:09 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-18 11:24 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-19 04:42 +0000
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-19 16:24 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-20 02:20 +0000
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-19 19:53 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-20 09:41 +0000
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-17 19:53 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-17 16:07 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-17 14:55 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-18 04:28 +0000
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-15 12:49 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-15 12:26 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-15 12:48 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-17 08:21 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-04 22:23 -0700
          Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-02 09:10 -0700
            Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Martin Shobe <martin.shobe@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-02 11:58 -0500
              Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-02 11:38 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Martin Shobe <martin.shobe@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-05 09:36 -0500
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-12 09:47 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-13 02:51 +0000
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-12 23:45 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-15 13:54 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-16 01:07 +0000
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-19 15:33 -0700
            Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-02 19:21 +0100
              Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-02 12:10 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-02 21:24 +0100
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-02 14:32 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-02 23:43 +0100
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-02 16:49 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-03 02:01 +0100
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-03 00:38 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-02 16:10 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-04 21:54 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-05 08:19 -0700
          Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-02 15:16 -0700
            Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-02 22:52 +0000
              Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-03 00:48 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-03 08:22 +0000
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-03 12:05 -0700
              Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-10-03 16:38 -0400
            Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-03 00:00 +0100
              Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-04 22:16 -0700

csiph-web