Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct

From	Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct
Date	2015-10-13 18:37 -0700
Organization	None to speak of
Message-ID	<lnpp0i9qmp.fsf@kst-u.example.com> (permalink)
References	(16 earlier) <57951b68-dbfb-4f16-8ed9-fad2a970ad19@googlegroups.com> <ln612gghdn.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <9d7adf0f-869c-4284-a546-3f0f0e6bdfc7@googlegroups.com> <lntwpzeo0n.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <6817e4d3-28d7-4e3d-8ea7-4bc2f178728c@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

supercat@casperkitty.com writes:
> On Friday, October 9, 2015 at 4:21:53 PM UTC-5, Keith Thompson wrote:
>> Do you agree that the second argument in the printf call violates
>> the "shall" requirement in N1570 6.5p7?
>
> It does.
>
>> Do you agree that this means that the evaluation of that argument
>> has undefined behavior?
>
> Except on implementations which define what will happen in such cases.
>
>> Do you agree that "undefined behavior" means only that the C standard
>> does not define the behavior?
>
> It means that the C Standard will say nothing whatsoever about the behavior
> of a program which invokes Undefined Behavior.

I see a contradiction between your second and third answers.

The phrase "undefined behavior" means only that the C standard itself
does not define the behavior.

Take signed integer overflow as an example:

    int too_big = INT_MAX + 1;

An implementation might choose to define the behavior.  The standard
does not.  That means it is "undefined behavior" in the sense in which
the Standard defines and uses that phrase.  It doesn't mean "behavior
that is not defined *by anything*; it means "behavior that is not
defined by the C standard".

>> Do you agree that an implementation is free to define the behavior
>> if it chooses to do so?
>
> Naturally.
>
>> If not, can you explain your disagreement?  Please note that I'm not
>> asking whether you approve of the rules given in the standard, just
>> whether you agree on what they are.
>
> Suppose an implementation documents e.g. that __SIX will be a pre-defined
> macro containing the digit 6.  What, if anything, would the Standard say
> about the behavior of the following program on that implementation?
>
>     int main(void)
>     {
>       unsigned char x = __SIX;
>       return -((-15)/2);
>     }

The standard says nothing about its behavior.  The standard *plus
the implementation's documentation" says that it initializes x to
6 and returns 7 from main.

> If the implementation did not document anything about the meaning of __SIX
> the program would engage in Undefined Behavior, and a compiler would be
> allowed to do anything it wanted with it.  If the use of __SIX is deemed
> to invoke Undefined Behavior even when an implementation defines it, then
> the Standard would say nothing about whether the (-15)/2 should yield -7
> or -8 (or do something else entirely) but I don't think that's very helpful.

That's right, the standard says nothing about it, and the standard by
itself is not useful in determining the behavior of the program.  The
standard plus the implementation's documentation specifies the behavior.

> I think it would be far more helpful to say that the defined meaning for
> __SIX would be considered an "extension", and that the a conforming compiler
> which includes that extension would be required to evaluate (-15)/2 as
> yielding -7.  If a compiler documenting the __SIX extension evaluated
> (-15)/2 as yielding -8, I would consider that a violation of the C99
> Standard even if the compilation unit containing the expression also
> contained the __SIX extension.

The standard restricts the behavior of extensions.  It doesn't
permit them to change the behavior of any strictly conforming
program (a program that uses the identifier __SIX is not strictly
conforming, so that's fine).  It requires them to be documented,
which implicitly requires that documentation to be accurate.

As I've said before, the distinction between an "extension" and a
compiler-specific feature that is not an "extension" is not clear,
at least not to me.

In this particular case, I don't think it matters in any practical
sense whether predefining __SIX as 6 is an "extension" or not.
If it is, the standard requires it to be documented, and that
documentation has to be accurate.  If it's not (and an implementer
is not required to treat it as an "extension"), then the implementer
still has an obligation to the users to make it work; that obligation
just isn't imposed or enforced by the C standard.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org  <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc.
"We must do something.  This is something.  Therefore, we must do this."
    -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"

Thread

Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-09-29 09:49 -0700
  Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct wssimms@gmail.com - 2015-09-30 21:18 -0700
    Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-01 09:35 -0700
      Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 09:41 -0700
        Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2015-10-01 18:34 +0000
          Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 12:02 -0700
    Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-10-02 13:03 +0000
      Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 06:20 -0700
        Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-02 16:07 +0100
          Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 08:46 -0700
            Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-02 17:28 +0100
              Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 10:30 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-02 20:32 +0100
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 12:58 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-02 22:06 +0100
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 09:31 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-03 14:31 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 09:27 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-03 20:36 +0100
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 13:00 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-03 23:37 +0100
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 17:07 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-03 17:42 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 17:49 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-10-03 23:28 -0400
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-04 00:10 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-04 13:24 +0100
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-04 14:07 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-04 14:40 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-04 18:04 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-04 20:10 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-04 22:15 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-05 08:53 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-06 08:45 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-06 12:34 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-06 17:16 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-06 21:47 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-07 11:05 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-07 11:47 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-07 13:50 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-07 18:10 -0400
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-07 16:10 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-07 16:33 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-08 09:08 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-08 10:43 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-08 11:50 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-08 12:19 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-07 15:32 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-07 16:21 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-08 08:54 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-08 11:15 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-08 12:38 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-08 13:30 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-08 14:15 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-08 14:53 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-08 15:23 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-08 17:24 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-09 08:02 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-09 09:02 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-09 12:43 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-09 14:21 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-09 15:14 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-13 18:37 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Martin Shobe <martin.shobe@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-07 20:56 -0500
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-07 19:41 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-07 23:15 -0400
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-10-14 10:05 +0000
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-10-14 11:23 +0100
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-14 08:24 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-10-16 11:12 +0000
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 21:55 +0100
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2015-10-16 22:08 -0500
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-14 11:44 -0400
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-14 11:12 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-10-07 10:34 +0000
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-07 07:23 -0400
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-07 09:53 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-10-14 10:13 +0000
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-14 11:36 -0400
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-04 13:35 +0100
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 06:23 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-04 15:34 +0100
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 08:07 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-04 14:42 +0000
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-10-04 15:37 +0000
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-05 00:33 +0100
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-10-14 10:20 +0000
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-14 13:55 +0100
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-04 22:06 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-10-14 10:30 +0000
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-14 08:39 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-14 23:47 +0000
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-15 10:20 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-15 11:10 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-15 12:11 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-15 12:35 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-15 13:52 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-15 14:35 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-15 15:51 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-16 06:48 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-16 08:50 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-16 10:06 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-16 12:45 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-16 13:56 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-16 14:29 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-16 14:52 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-16 15:32 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-16 15:59 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-17 00:03 +0000
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-17 00:08 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-17 15:26 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-17 16:38 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-16 23:43 +0000
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-16 23:57 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-17 14:50 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-18 10:55 +1300
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-17 18:24 -0400
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-10-17 18:39 -0400
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-17 18:56 -0400
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-17 16:17 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-18 11:46 -0400
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-10-17 19:44 -0400
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-17 16:48 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-10-18 01:14 +0100
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-10-17 20:22 -0400
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-17 17:26 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-10-18 01:44 +0100
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-17 20:09 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-18 11:24 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-19 04:42 +0000
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-19 16:24 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-20 02:20 +0000
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-19 19:53 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-20 09:41 +0000
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-17 19:53 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-17 16:07 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-17 14:55 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-18 04:28 +0000
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-15 12:49 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-15 12:26 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-15 12:48 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-17 08:21 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-04 22:23 -0700
          Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-02 09:10 -0700
            Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Martin Shobe <martin.shobe@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-02 11:58 -0500
              Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-02 11:38 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Martin Shobe <martin.shobe@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-05 09:36 -0500
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-12 09:47 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-13 02:51 +0000
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-12 23:45 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-15 13:54 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-16 01:07 +0000
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-19 15:33 -0700
            Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-02 19:21 +0100
              Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-02 12:10 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-02 21:24 +0100
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-02 14:32 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-02 23:43 +0100
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-02 16:49 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-03 02:01 +0100
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-03 00:38 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-02 16:10 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-04 21:54 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-05 08:19 -0700
          Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-02 15:16 -0700
            Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-02 22:52 +0000
              Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-03 00:48 -0700
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-03 08:22 +0000
                Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-03 12:05 -0700
              Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-10-03 16:38 -0400
            Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-03 00:00 +0100
              Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-04 22:16 -0700

csiph-web