Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #511008

Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE

From David Staup <dstaup@charter.net>
Newsgroups sci.physics, alt.astronomy
Subject Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE
Date 2015-08-03 13:03 -0500
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <mpoa9s$ksf$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <mZWdnSdQhIwNvyPInZ2dnUU7-T-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <mpl97f$4gu$1@dont-email.me> <mZWdnV5QhIzBtCPInZ2dnUU7-T-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <mpljsa$csn$1@dont-email.me> <mplp3j$23q$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 8/2/2015 1:12 PM, hanson wrote:
> "David Staup" "<dstaup@charter.net>" whose handle
> appropriately anagrams to "Standup Chatterer", wrote:
>> Einstein Dingleberry kike Sam Wormley wrote:
>>> HVAC Harlow Campbell the parrot, wrote:
>>>>
> Sam Wormley BELIEVES and wrote:
>>>>>     What's false and what's not, is determined by the hard data of
>>>>>     observation and experiment. To date, there has NEVER been an
>>>>>     observation that contradicts a prediction of special or general
>>>>>     relativity. Einstein's relativity remains a fruitful tool of
>>>>>     classical physics.
>>>>
> Harlow the parrot, wrote:
>>>> Not if you're a kook.
> read the posts written by BJ, AA, John, Bert, etc.
>>>> They view science as the wool that is being pulled over our (the
>>>> sheeple) eyes. To them, observation and experiment are tricks we
>>>> scientists deploy. Since ESP, et al cannot be proven under lab
>>>> conditions, that means the conditions are the problem. They seek a new,
>>>> less rigid manner of testing.
>>>>
> Sam Wormley BELIEVES and wrote:
>>>    I was hoping to have a positive science influence on the above,
>>> but it
>>>    appears that they don't care anything about the real physics.  :-(
>>>
> "Standup Chatterer" Staup made Staub & wrote:
>> that you just now figured that out ought to be surprising....but it's
>> not.
>>
> hanson wrote:
> Harlow's remark. may have some validity in the traditional orthodox
> way of BELIEFS in that "they seek a new less rigid manner of testing"
> but Staup, you just made Staub by parroting the parrots.... ahahaha...
> unless ... .you, Staup, can show where you have ever encountered
> even one single, real world event, in your personal life or career,
> which you were not able to solve without using SR/GR...
>>
> ... barring story telling, brain-farting and quarreling
> over SR/GR.. Your  bizarre coat-tail-riding and
> parroting is rooted in the fact that physics like all
> other sciences are socio-politically enterprises &
> hence subjected to the whims of social fashion and
> political hackery.
>>
> So, Staup, unless you can show that one personal
> SR/GR encounter, use the paragraph above as your
> excuse....
>>
> Till then, thanks for the laughs.... ahahahahanson
>
>
>
>>
>
the limits of your intellect are clear ....to all but yourself


chuckle

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 10:26 -0400
  Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 09:29 -0500
    Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 11:15 -0400
      Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-02 09:36 -0700
    Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-08-02 12:28 -0500
      Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-02 11:12 -0700
        Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-08-03 13:03 -0500
          Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-03 11:35 -0700
    Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 01:56 -0400
  Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-02 08:31 -0700
    Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE "NotTroll2Ol5" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2015-08-02 14:07 -0500
      Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-02 12:38 -0700
    Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-08-02 11:40 -0700
    Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-03 11:36 -0400

csiph-web