Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE

From	"hanson" <hanson@quick.net>
Newsgroups	sci.physics, alt.astronomy
Subject	Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE
Date	2015-08-02 11:12 -0700
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<mplp3j$23q$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<611a2dfe-ccf5-4e9a-988a-afb1e28e42ab@googlegroups.com> <mZWdnSdQhIwNvyPInZ2dnUU7-T-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <mpl97f$4gu$1@dont-email.me> <mZWdnV5QhIzBtCPInZ2dnUU7-T-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <mpljsa$csn$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

"David Staup" "<dstaup@charter.net>" whose handle
appropriately anagrams to "Standup Chatterer", wrote:
> Einstein Dingleberry kike Sam Wormley wrote:
>> HVAC Harlow Campbell the parrot, wrote:
>>>
Sam Wormley BELIEVES and wrote:
>>>>     What's false and what's not, is determined by the hard data of
>>>>     observation and experiment. To date, there has NEVER been an
>>>>     observation that contradicts a prediction of special or general
>>>>     relativity. Einstein's relativity remains a fruitful tool of
>>>>     classical physics.
>>>
Harlow the parrot, wrote:
>>> Not if you're a kook.
read the posts written by BJ, AA, John, Bert, etc.
>>> They view science as the wool that is being pulled over our (the
>>> sheeple) eyes. To them, observation and experiment are tricks we
>>> scientists deploy. Since ESP, et al cannot be proven under lab
>>> conditions, that means the conditions are the problem. They seek a new,
>>> less rigid manner of testing.
>>>
Sam Wormley BELIEVES and wrote:
>>    I was hoping to have a positive science influence on the above, but it
>>    appears that they don't care anything about the real physics.  :-(
>>
"Standup Chatterer" Staup made Staub & wrote:
> that you just now figured that out ought to be surprising....but it's not.
>
hanson wrote:
Harlow's remark. may have some validity in the traditional orthodox
way of BELIEFS in that "they seek a new less rigid manner of testing"
but Staup, you just made Staub by parroting the parrots.... ahahaha...
unless ... .you, Staup, can show where you have ever encountered
even one single, real world event, in your personal life or career,
which you were not able to solve without using SR/GR...
>
... barring story telling, brain-farting and quarreling
over SR/GR.. Your  bizarre coat-tail-riding and
parroting is rooted in the fact that physics like all
other sciences are socio-politically enterprises &
hence subjected to the whims of social fashion and
political hackery.
>
So, Staup, unless you can show that one personal
SR/GR encounter, use the paragraph above as your
excuse....
>
Till then, thanks for the laughs.... ahahahahanson



>

Thread

Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 10:26 -0400
  Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 09:29 -0500
    Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 11:15 -0400
      Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-02 09:36 -0700
    Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-08-02 12:28 -0500
      Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-02 11:12 -0700
        Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-08-03 13:03 -0500
          Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-03 11:35 -0700
    Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 01:56 -0400
  Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-02 08:31 -0700
    Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE "NotTroll2Ol5" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2015-08-02 14:07 -0500
      Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-02 12:38 -0700
    Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-08-02 11:40 -0700
    Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-03 11:36 -0400

csiph-web