Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #510750
| From | HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, alt.astronomy |
| Subject | Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE |
| Date | 2015-08-02 11:15 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <mplc2o$eqo$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <611a2dfe-ccf5-4e9a-988a-afb1e28e42ab@googlegroups.com> <mZWdnSdQhIwNvyPInZ2dnUU7-T-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <mpl97f$4gu$1@dont-email.me> <mZWdnV5QhIzBtCPInZ2dnUU7-T-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 8/2/2015 10:29 AM, Sam Wormley wrote: > >> Just read the posts written by BJ, AA, John, Bert, etc. >> They view science as the wool that is being pulled over our (the >> sheeple) eyes. To them, observation and experiment are tricks we >> scientists deploy. Since ESP, et al cannot be proven under lab >> conditions, that means the conditions are the problem. They seek a new, >> less rigid manner of testing. >> > > > I was hoping to have a positive science influence on the above, but it > appears that they don't care anything about the real physics. :-( Yes. Old dogs and new tricks. Once you make the decision to forgo the rigid testing demanded by science, you are on a path that will ALWAYS lead to failure. Kooks like these seek to skip the hard work. They dismiss as irrelevant anything or anyone that contradicts their kook worldview. They simply KNOW that things like ghosts, ESP, etc. are real. If it can't be proven repeatedly in lab conditions, it's the labs fault. Not their kook 'science'. When most rational people come up against something they do not understand, they seek to educate themselves in order to grasp it. Kooks, when faced with a concept they do not understand, deny it and throw it out. Be it John with his 'fractal universe', or Bert with his nonsensical G=EMC^2, or BJ with his remote viewing, or AA with his ether... ALL feel like they have a better idea. They get mad at me for calling a spade a spade and pointing out that the emperor has no clothes -- Cut off one head, two more shall take its place. HAIL HYDRA! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZcG5UOY224
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 10:26 -0400
Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 09:29 -0500
Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 11:15 -0400
Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-02 09:36 -0700
Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-08-02 12:28 -0500
Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-02 11:12 -0700
Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-08-03 13:03 -0500
Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-03 11:35 -0700
Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 01:56 -0400
Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-02 08:31 -0700
Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE "NotTroll2Ol5" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2015-08-02 14:07 -0500
Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-02 12:38 -0700
Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-08-02 11:40 -0700
Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-03 11:36 -0400
csiph-web