Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE

From	David Staup <dstaup@charter.net>
Newsgroups	sci.physics, alt.astronomy
Subject	Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE
Date	2015-08-02 12:28 -0500
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<mpljsa$csn$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<611a2dfe-ccf5-4e9a-988a-afb1e28e42ab@googlegroups.com> <mZWdnSdQhIwNvyPInZ2dnUU7-T-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <mpl97f$4gu$1@dont-email.me> <mZWdnV5QhIzBtCPInZ2dnUU7-T-dnZ2d@giganews.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 8/2/2015 9:29 AM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> On 8/2/15 9:26 AM, HVAC wrote:
>> On 8/2/2015 10:00 AM, Sam Wormley wrote:
>>>
>>>     What's false and what's not, is determined by the hard data of
>>>     observation and experiment. To date, there has NEVER been an
>>>     observation that contradicts a prediction of special or general
>>>     relativity. Einstein's relativity remains a fruitful tool of
>>>     classical physics.
>>
>>
>> Not if you're a kook.
>>
>> Just read the posts written by BJ, AA, John, Bert, etc.
>> They view science as the wool that is being pulled over our (the
>> sheeple) eyes. To them, observation and experiment are tricks we
>> scientists deploy. Since ESP, et al cannot be proven under lab
>> conditions, that means the conditions are the problem. They seek a new,
>> less rigid manner of testing.
>>
>
>
>    I was hoping to have a positive science influence on the above, but it
>    appears that they don't care anything about the real physics.  :-(
>
>
>
that you just now figured that out ought to be surprising....but it's not.

Thread

Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 10:26 -0400
  Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 09:29 -0500
    Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 11:15 -0400
      Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-02 09:36 -0700
    Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-08-02 12:28 -0500
      Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-02 11:12 -0700
        Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-08-03 13:03 -0500
          Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-03 11:35 -0700
    Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 01:56 -0400
  Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-02 08:31 -0700
    Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE "NotTroll2Ol5" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2015-08-02 14:07 -0500
      Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-02 12:38 -0700
    Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-08-02 11:40 -0700
    Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-03 11:36 -0400

csiph-web