Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #510751

Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

"HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> Harlow Campbell wrote:
 > Sam Wormley wrote:
>>
Harlow wrote:
>>> Just read the posts written by BJ, AA, John, Bert, etc.
>>> They view science as the wool that is being pulled over our (the
>>> sheeple) eyes. To them, observation and experiment are tricks we
>>> scientists deploy. Since ESP, et al cannot be proven under lab
>>> conditions, that means the conditions are the problem. They seek a new,
>>> less rigid manner of testing.
>>>
Kike Wormley proselitized & wrote:
>>    I was hoping to have a positive science influence on the above, but it
>>    appears that they don't care anything about the real physics.  :-(
>
Parrot Harlow wrote:
> Yes. Old dogs and new tricks.
> Once you make the decision to forgo the rigid testing demanded by science, 
> you are on a path that will ALWAYS lead to failure. Kooks like these seek 
> to skip the hard work. They dismiss as irrelevant anything or anyone that 
> contradicts their kook worldview. They simply KNOW that
> things like ghosts, ESP, etc. are real. If it can't be proven repeatedly 
> in lab conditions, it's the labs fault. Not their kook 'science'.
> When most rational people come up against something they do not 
> understand, they seek to educate themselves in order to grasp it. Kooks, 
> when faced with a concept they do not understand, deny it and throw it 
> out. Be it John with his 'fractal universe', or Bert with his nonsensical 
> G=EMC^2, or BJ with his remote viewing, or AA with his ether... ALL feel 
> like they have a better idea. They get mad at me for calling a spade a 
> spade and pointing out that the emperor has no clothes
>
hanson wrote:
.... ahahahaha.... Harlow, now that you have made a
passionate case to worship Albert's Sphinter, and imply
that Einstein's usless crap is better, add yourself as a
"Self-kook" to the above listed ones... unless...
>
you, Harlow, can show where you have ever encountered
even one single, real world event, in your personal
life or career, which you were not able to solve without
using SR/GR...
>
... barring story telling, brain-farting and quarreling
over SR/GR.. Your  bizarre coat-tail-riding and
parroting is rooted in the fact that physics like all
other sciences are socio-politically enterprises &
hence subjected to the whims of social fashion and
political hackery.
>
So, Harlow unless you can show that one personal
SR/GR encounter, use the last paragraph above
as your excuse....
>
Till then, thanks for the laughs.... ahahahahanson

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 10:26 -0400
  Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 09:29 -0500
    Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 11:15 -0400
      Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-02 09:36 -0700
    Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-08-02 12:28 -0500
      Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-02 11:12 -0700
        Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-08-03 13:03 -0500
          Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-03 11:35 -0700
    Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 01:56 -0400
  Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-02 08:31 -0700
    Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE "NotTroll2Ol5" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2015-08-02 14:07 -0500
      Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-02 12:38 -0700
    Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-08-02 11:40 -0700
    Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-03 11:36 -0400

csiph-web