Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #291728

Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit)

From owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit)
Date 2015-04-27 04:04 +0000
Organization ok by me, so long as it doesn't get out of hand
Message-ID <mmbnjc9e.ki@rooftop.invalid> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <e187bacc-ccf5-48ca-bf4e-25e482e7f892@googlegroups.com> <hgu03.f0a33@rooftop.invalid> <b28ad674-9e81-4075-bfd4-166dd289085d@googlegroups.com> <bbvhgu83.a3@rooftop.invalid> <942977b6-ac12-4024-b05a-3efd3ecab157@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 9:55:08 PM UTC-6, owl wrote:
>> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 9:21:03 PM UTC-6, owl wrote:
>> 
>> > (snip)
>> 
>> >> Nope.  Still your key:
>> >> 
>> >> gpg: encrypted with 4096-bit RSA key, ID 0A9ADCBE, created 2015-04-26
>> >>       "Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com>"
>> >> gpg: decryption failed: secret key not available
>> >>  
>> >> You are encrypting to your own public key.
>> >> You need to either encrypt to just my public key, or add me as a recipient.
>> >> 
>> >> pub   2048R/B0984AAB 2015-04-27
>> >> uid                  owl (usenet) <owl@rooftop.invalid>
>> >> sub   2048R/7B91B00A 2015-04-27
>> >> 
>> >> pub   4096R/CEAFFF9D 2015-04-26 [expires: 2019-04-26]
>> >> uid                  Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
>> >> sub   4096R/0A9ADCBE 2015-04-26 [expires: 2019-04-26]
>> 
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> > Hash: SHA512
>> 
>> > I just put the software (and key) on my old MBP, which I'm sending this post from. I thought I did add you as a recipient. The box was checked to do so.
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> > Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
>> 
>> > iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVPa73AAoJEC03b6bOr/+dLscQAIGrSYsTdMHfWL5+qQRVxzm3
>> > v8LB2zhcF/pEn8J2truf0Tfw9E9GQAsEeD7C8dkTNAPhFTOPFGZ01x+wn0vKKJAE
>> > pvd7ESSw8etf4I3C4w9Nl6T8QXUMQaDyK1eBokiztCKGd7y6HGqworkH3KDAuBMY
>> > ocLuJLSVNaaBhn/D/NX13M2HUQ5tcQjXGhK2MGJZqNDbwQiAn6181T0QUMgD/86c
>> > INXC90ckP3dTUyQLjdJpKwvT3cMJrtzWNZZKPbRwOJoNAlaoXHTkjhFPuDs26JBt
>> > +qZX1GHTc6ByXGxRgY6KvmrhLiYfzoxAWolMKweXlVoRCBWX21UE4Rl98pGgQjNl
>> > jdpIpxNre/2qpwcZBf3SvZt5JLEnDXaI+2K1zzTqHoQtXCuQudjJ8oeg28eJD97u
>> > QH72rVXv/LLyzO7hcmQ1HvGQvh+xl+uEajnSaA4s6q8HgHRpfI7mQ0+wF/CCLXSj
>> > 8TnzzlE2/zyn71J51ZXQBhK99qj7EI9h0MNODMlgvq3edrQWFBHjXULUy/5nfhEj
>> > I8YYxWHnPWWc79WeNBZM05r9g4PfLS/2heseyAJxZwv9Abduf48iujbv5dA21LqI
>> > VN88HYYMqZopN+aAG6yntl8RGM5VAx3/5s+093/u/0m5kcIX9bpG811Fq1e1wX5f
>> > DkiFSenncxo6zTPm1c40
>> > =YaAD
>> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> 
>> gpg: Signature made Sun 26 Apr 2015 11:37:27 PM EDT using RSA key ID CEAFFF9D
>> gpg: BAD signature from "Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com>"
>> 
>> Google may have mangled the message with the long line.  Try signing
>> something short.  Let's just make sure the signing part works.

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512

> Here, I'll force line breaks (Lloyd would love it). Just 
> to see if that was the case. It didn't seem to matter 
> on the iMac for some reason... but I think you're right.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org

> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVPbQsAAoJEC03b6bOr/+dcdMP/iEu9K33/dyiYKJ420M8b/6Q
> D0CDx29qIbC9CQP/E8Qj3DEmKkGx+kVZMxrxnYVmXToxnub+rMTeVEpReqLfVmF7
> XJeeoVoZ6k9ckx8VXlH/Ki8GTmYsmvzvld7G9IWzmxyEXrVUU2yL3MXb2XTlgE+g
> BlqKJSjKOUOVFv9+ZRHUnLL00eEffoyMRmkk6/YMs4CZ1uS6ZbpLEQZcoP3QkdR0
> ZnxDLl4TkjJjauf+MaNGQjKkjalWZuYep2U2kFj5mXAXztID/8kMNcR2UpXZNbvF
> efcBljx97GtRyX+vPaG9ZI+JItwSjW2RuHdcc5NmVMymkk/ITN7jCvt6YbrcqI1b
> 6whd+DCAZxdmIQO72F0eDw4YzK421AjOJHGwhoxkCKzKecOwrXpvixSOcbRb5UTW
> 1jdPQXXNtxUgm21kLJ2fSiMnvhGZymVz/BSQE2185rhXeM7PPEIeQuH88HzuTHUI
> qHZUbgvAQiJ15wpuuOm16iJ+9wshqoB15ZqoC5JvAWkPcFN8lUcyJdLPsO5mBcQj
> v/MSgfCyonFCp3iRbVnxYW7/CUG1pvK4LyDdt3zRvU5yXyLqA7ueno9UngbYDOkO
> jMC8VLlFEauC9tXtsKPGSj8mK9tlgokxEevOCgk/sHaoOp/kBDx+DOh2dvgpmZYF
> AeHFMT+Cls+7LdAlcQQP
> =71Yv
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Good sig.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-23 11:40 -0700
  Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-23 11:46 -0700
  Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-23 15:12 -0400
    Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-23 12:23 -0700
    Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-23 12:59 -0700
      Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-23 15:49 -0700
        Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-23 20:41 -0400
        Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-23 21:44 -0700
          Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-04-24 04:31 -0700
            Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-24 10:30 -0700
              Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-24 20:08 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-25 10:49 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-25 18:40 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-25 11:53 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-25 19:18 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-25 12:25 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 09:54 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 17:30 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 10:43 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 11:29 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 18:49 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 12:23 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 12:48 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 19:55 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 13:25 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 13:33 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 14:00 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 21:22 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 14:32 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 21:50 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 15:01 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 15:05 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 22:35 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 14:35 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 14:40 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 22:09 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 15:21 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 15:21 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 22:40 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 15:47 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 22:51 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 15:49 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 22:56 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 16:00 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 23:32 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 16:46 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 00:00 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 17:02 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 17:08 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 00:47 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 18:14 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 01:41 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 19:04 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 02:32 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 19:38 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 02:46 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 19:59 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 03:21 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 20:38 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 20:45 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 03:58 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 21:04 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 21:06 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 21:12 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 04:20 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 03:55 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 20:57 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 04:02 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 20:59 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 04:04 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 19:01 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 19:11 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 19:47 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 17:11 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 20:06 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 20:47 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 12:40 -0700

csiph-web