Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #482637

Re: Daft as Einstein eh!

From Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Daft as Einstein eh!
Date 2019-01-31 12:21 +1100
Message-ID <gbf0tiFsbhkU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (8 earlier) <D7E3E.286505$ZE1.140197@fx24.am4> <gb9n34Fn6gvU1@mid.individual.net> <J1V3E.430173$3si.286785@fx08.am4> <gbap0sFu3n3U1@mid.individual.net> <RSj4E.592805$Fi6.514076@fx12.am4>

Show all headers | View raw

On 31/01/2019 3:00 am, Keith Stein wrote:
> On 29/01/2019 10:42, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> On 29/01/2019 8:29 pm, Keith Stein wrote:
>>> On 29/01/2019 01:03, Sylvia Else wrote:
> 
>>>> You seem to be arguing in favour of a kind of aether dragging model, 
>>>> except in your model, matter substitutes for the aether, no matter 
>>>> how tenuous the matter.
>>>
>>> Exactly so Sylvia. One could say that it is equivalent
>>> to a fully dragged ether model, but i would much rather we
>>> not do that, as, from experience, the introduction of the
>>> notion of "ether" only serves to confuse. The medium, for
>>> any wave, be it water, sound, or light, is the "matter"
>>> which it is passing through.
>>>
>>>> Such a model faces the same obstacles as the aether dragging model 
>>>> did. It was impossible to make it fit the experimental evidence 
>>>> without introducing ever more implausible assumptions about it.
>>>>
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aether_drag_hypothesis
>>>
>>> If we limit our discussion to inertial coordinate systems,
>>> like Einstein did in his SR, i do not agree that any
>>> additional assumptions are required. Your link, while
>>> entirely appropriate and relevant, actually illustrates
>>> how the notion of "ether" only served to confuse. I would
>>> happily explain the fallacies  in any of those arguments
>>> given in your Wikipedia article, but really do not have
>>> time to take that lot on right now eh!
>>>
>>>> For your model to be viable, you would have to address all the 
>>>> issues that faced physicists in the pre-relativity era. In the end, 
>>>> they were not successful.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Pick the argument which you think most clearly
>>> demonstrates that my model is wrong Sylvia, and
>>> i will explain to you why it doesn't eh!
>>>
>>> keith stein
>>>
>>>> Sylvia.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Let's consider the situation being examined by the Fizeau experiment.
>>
>> If light travels through stationary water at some speed v, and then 
>> the water itself is moved at speed w relative to some observer, what 
>> does your model say about the speed that the light will travel 
>> relative to that observer.
>>
>> v +/- w?
>>
>> Something else?
>>
>> Sylvia.
> 
> Sorry for the delay responding, been away on the boat.
> 
> If you put the water in a tank on a train, then for sure
> it is easy (for me :) ) to show that the speed of light
> in the water relative to observer on the embankment
>   = v +/- w
> where v is the speed of the train, and w = c/n(water)
> 
> Now this was not of course how Fizeau determined the
> speed of light in moving water, and i have two quite
> separate objections to Fizeau's method. Firstly he
> relies on reversing the water flow without changing
> the optical path by a fraction on the wavelength of
> light, and i am very doubtful that he could do that,
> or know that he had, even if he could.
> 
> Even more important, because the water circulates,
> i.e. changes direction, the velocity of water is
> not constant, and therefore the water does not
> constitute an inertial frame of reference.

> 
> One of the few things Einstein got right, in my
> opinion, was to start by limiting his considerations
> to inertial ,constant velocity, systems, as Einstein
> did  his SR.
> 
> So is there ANY experiment (using inertial systems)
> which proves that light does not travel with a velocity
> appropriate to, and relative to, the matter it is
> traveling through, Sylvia?
> 
> keith stein

Relativity describes the results for inertial observers. It doesn't 
require everything to be inertial.

I don't doubt that you'll seek to argue that any result is invalid if it 
contradicts your model.

In the later refinement by Michelson and Morley, the experimental set up 
was such that motion of the tubes did not move the fringes. It is 
grasping at straws to argue that despite that, the reversal of the flow 
would do so for reasons unrelated to effect the flow has on the passage 
of light.

In any case, the results are not so easily dismissed. You are arguing 
that they are simply wrong, but you also need to address the fact that 
both experiments produced results that are consistent with a theory that 
wouldn't appear until 20 years after MM's work. It would be an 
extraordinary coincidence were it to happen, in two separate 
experiments, due to experimental error.

Sylvia.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 12:36 +0000
  Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2019-01-27 05:01 -0800
    Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 15:30 +0000
      Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2019-01-27 08:21 -0800
      Re: Daft as Einstein eh! yeurohenry@gmail.com - 2019-01-27 11:15 -0800
        Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 21:38 +0000
          Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2019-01-27 16:33 -0800
            Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 18:36 +0000
              Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2019-01-28 11:33 -0800
              Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2019-01-28 22:07 -0600
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 08:07 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2019-01-29 04:47 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 13:00 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! maluwozniak@gmail.com - 2019-01-30 06:59 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Python <python@python.invalid> - 2019-01-31 00:34 +0100
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 15:42 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! maluwozniak@gmail.com - 2019-01-30 23:10 -0800
          Re: Daft as Einstein eh! yeurohenry@gmail.com - 2019-01-27 18:36 -0800
          Re: Daft as Einstein eh! yeurohenry@gmail.com - 2019-01-27 19:07 -0800
            Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 18:57 +0000
              Re: Daft as Einstein eh! yeurohenry@gmail.com - 2019-01-28 11:21 -0800
  Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2019-01-27 10:10 -0600
    Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 17:53 +0000
    Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 14:15 -0800
  Re: Daft as Einstein eh! JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 12:05 -0800
    Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 22:12 +0000
      Re: Daft as Einstein eh! JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 16:23 -0800
      Re: Daft as Einstein eh! kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2019-01-28 07:42 -0800
      Re: Daft as Einstein eh! kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2019-01-31 14:21 -0800
        Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 03:48 +0000
          Re: Daft as Einstein eh! kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2019-02-01 08:29 -0800
            Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 07:48 +0000
              Re: Daft as Einstein eh! kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2019-02-02 11:59 -0800
    Re: Daft as Einstein eh! maluwozniak@gmail.com - 2019-01-27 23:10 -0800
  Re: Daft as Einstein eh! mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-01-27 14:03 -0800
  Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-01-28 11:29 +1100
    Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 02:43 +0000
      Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-01-28 14:12 +1100
        Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 07:58 +0000
          Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-01-28 19:26 +1100
            Re: Daft as Einstein eh! maluwozniak@gmail.com - 2019-01-28 00:38 -0800
            Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 09:37 +0000
              Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-01-28 22:14 +1100
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 14:15 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! yeurohenry@gmail.com - 2019-01-28 07:46 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 17:15 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! yeurohenry@gmail.com - 2019-01-28 11:13 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2019-01-28 09:07 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 18:10 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2019-01-28 11:19 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-01-29 12:03 +1100
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 09:29 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-01-29 21:42 +1100
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2019-01-30 15:31 +0100
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 16:00 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2019-01-30 20:45 +0100
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 22:28 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 23:33 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 18:12 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2019-01-31 10:57 +0100
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-01-31 12:21 +1100
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 06:24 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-01-31 20:06 +1100
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 12:32 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-01 08:33 +1100
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2019-01-31 07:23 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Káèek Cnemu <upkp@kawpwnus.cv> - 2019-01-31 15:28 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Káèek Cnemu <upkp@kawpwnus.cv> - 2019-01-31 15:31 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-01 12:47 +1100
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Káèek Cnemu <upkp@kawpwnus.cv> - 2019-02-01 20:03 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 18:26 -0500
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 20:10 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-04 19:16 +1100
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! maluwozniak@gmail.com - 2019-02-04 01:13 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-05 12:12 +1100
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 16:14 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 16:35 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 17:19 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 17:33 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 18:50 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 19:55 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! yeurohenry@gmail.com - 2019-01-31 17:03 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 04:11 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! yeurohenry@gmail.com - 2019-01-31 22:35 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 10:05 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! yeurohenry@gmail.com - 2019-02-01 09:37 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 23:37 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! yeurohenry@gmail.com - 2019-02-01 18:33 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 06:02 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! yeurohenry@gmail.com - 2019-02-02 00:32 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 17:32 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! yeurohenry@gmail.com - 2019-02-02 10:43 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 19:17 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2019-02-03 15:17 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! maluwozniak@gmail.com - 2019-02-03 23:19 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! maluwozniak@gmail.com - 2019-02-02 23:19 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! maluwozniak@gmail.com - 2019-02-01 23:55 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! maluwozniak@gmail.com - 2019-02-01 16:02 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 17:56 -0500
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 23:23 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 18:23 -0500
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-03 14:46 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2019-02-04 10:49 -0600
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2019-02-04 09:37 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-04 18:21 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2019-02-04 13:23 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2019-02-04 16:31 -0600
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2019-02-04 22:27 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2019-02-05 02:04 -0500
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2019-02-05 09:27 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 10:40 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 19:07 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2019-02-04 10:29 -0600
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2019-02-04 18:16 +0100
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2019-01-31 09:03 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! maluwozniak@gmail.com - 2019-01-31 09:33 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Káèek Cnemu <upkp@kawpwnus.cv> - 2019-01-31 20:48 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! maluwozniak@gmail.com - 2019-01-30 23:13 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-01-31 20:11 +1100
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! maluwozniak@gmail.com - 2019-01-31 03:29 -0800
          Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2019-01-28 03:50 -0800
            Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 19:10 +0000
              Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2019-01-28 11:35 -0800
            Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-01 16:44 +1100
              Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 09:17 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-01 21:53 +1100
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 14:43 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2019-02-01 08:12 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! maluwozniak@gmail.com - 2019-02-01 09:31 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-02-01 16:51 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 21:43 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-02-01 22:23 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 22:43 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-02 11:11 +1100
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 07:13 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-02 22:06 +1100
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-02-03 11:31 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2019-02-03 04:12 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-02-03 17:58 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-04 08:25 +1100
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-02-04 10:50 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-04 22:23 +1100
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-02-04 12:11 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-04 23:33 +1100
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-06 17:13 +1100
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! maluwozniak@gmail.com - 2019-02-06 00:00 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-02-04 15:18 +0000
                Daft as Keith Stein eh! "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2019-02-04 08:51 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-05 11:49 +1100
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2019-02-03 19:51 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2019-02-04 09:26 -0500
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! maluwozniak@gmail.com - 2019-02-04 06:39 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2019-02-04 10:08 -0500
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! maluwozniak@gmail.com - 2019-02-04 07:35 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-04 16:51 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! maluwozniak@gmail.com - 2019-02-05 07:45 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-04 08:13 +1100
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-03 21:52 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-02-04 12:02 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-04 23:43 +1100
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2019-02-04 04:49 -0800
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-02-04 13:23 +0000
                Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-04 13:28 +0000
      Re: Daft as Einstein eh! yeurohenry@gmail.com - 2019-01-28 00:13 -0800
        Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2019-02-03 12:58 +0000
          Re: Daft as Einstein eh! yeurohenry@gmail.com - 2019-02-03 10:56 -0800
    Re: Daft as Einstein eh! maluwozniak@gmail.com - 2019-01-27 23:13 -0800
      Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-01-28 22:18 +1100
        Re: Daft as Einstein eh! maluwozniak@gmail.com - 2019-01-28 04:55 -0800
          Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-01-29 00:28 +1100
            Re: Daft as Einstein eh! maluwozniak@gmail.com - 2019-01-28 05:48 -0800
    Re: Daft as Einstein eh! kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2019-01-28 07:50 -0800
  Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 09:25 -0800
    Re: Daft as Einstein eh! JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 12:50 -0800
      Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 15:41 -0800
        Re: Daft as Einstein eh! JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 15:44 -0800
          Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 16:56 -0800
            Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Káèek Cnemu <upkp@kawpwnus.cv> - 2019-01-31 15:24 +0000
          Re: Daft as Einstein eh! Káèek Cnemu <upkp@kawpwnus.cv> - 2019-01-31 15:22 +0000
  Re: Daft as Einstein eh! carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2019-02-01 20:03 -0800
  Re: Daft as Einstein eh! carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2019-02-01 20:05 -0800
  Re: Daft as Einstein eh! carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2019-02-03 15:24 -0800
  Re: Daft as Einstein eh! carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2019-02-03 15:29 -0800
  Re: Daft as Einstein eh! carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2019-02-03 15:33 -0800

csiph-web