Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #291665

Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit)

From owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit)
Date 2015-04-26 22:35 +0000
Organization ok by me, so long as it doesn't get out of hand
Message-ID <bvnhdu93.ap3ra@rooftop.invalid> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <bbnvyc83.kajg@rooftop.invalid> <6549e76a-477a-4f50-844d-1d963e204610@googlegroups.com> <bvy73.jaol3@rooftop.invalid> <532bf8bd-8b65-4d53-938f-4287ebacf6fd@googlegroups.com> <3a938e9c-bb6c-4be6-b7fe-01bfc3b97deb@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 4:01:49 PM UTC-6, Steve Carroll wrote:
>> On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 3:50:14 PM UTC-6, owl wrote:
>> > Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 3:22:33 PM UTC-6, owl wrote:
>> > >> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> > On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 2:33:04 PM UTC-6, Steve Carroll wrote:
>> > >> 
>> > >> > (snip)
>> > >> 
>> > >> > I just tested it in the browser, I highlighted this...
>> > >> 
>> > >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- 
>> > >> > Hash: SHA512 
>> > >> 
>> > >> > This is a signing test. 
>> > >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- 
>> > >> > Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org 
>> > >> 
>> > >> > iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVPUcAAAoJEKLThH5e1B4r/8oH/2NuIb5h5PqoDhwXeGdQz9/D 
>> > >> > c6zpKqaLTdPXowVekEmS5CEbQKUBY8hokmaYGOEMaa3DMefIHN38YqWn5vRZ/AFC 
>> > >> > 4cYPmjgNepDCRn1t1L7gYFxBAuuSvcKiMpbVj3AZ6EFt4XLHsWFF13ojof6PyyBG 
>> > >> > F9OAlx/jI80PzctWEhMqk2U24OGPMTgkED487ZGtkp2IHHPTLnwG2iwWewecFRUG 
>> > >> > 9VKO/Fo/nRy5+CsLXDC+Svma/TOhuz7P9utDLiKO+bVTegoSJhPUc5MtvzKHsORi 
>> > >> > +8RMcXtrqkMZ8NxOpY2Ble9Q3SvCoCBGeUKJEpe8ubkAGAT6AaxLuUKVMgLF/Jg= 
>> > >> > =WB15 
>> > >> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- 
>> > >> 
>> > >> > ... and I was able to 'verify' it was from me so it seems to be working (in other words, Google isn't munging it). So if this is working correctly... do I have the idea here with this:
>> > >> 
>> > >> > * I create a key pair and share the public half of it
>> > >> 
>> > >> > * I write a message and 'sign' it  (like I just quoted)
>> > >> 
>> > >> > * The end user grabs my public key (one time) and stores it in his GPG keychain
>> > >> 
>> > >> > * When the end user sees a signed message by me he simply highlights it and can verify it instantly with a mouse click (or however it's done in their system).
>> > >> 
>> > >> > I emailed myself a signed message and my mail app came back saying it was secure and from me. Seems like that's it, eh? Thanks, dude! I probably never would have gotten around to doing this if not for you, this is definitely a useful thing for a number of reasons. If you know, how secure is this? What's the "the trust level" bit? Is it based on me verifying it in the real world (like a phone call or something)?
>> > >> 
>> > >> The trust level, you get other people who trust your key to sign your
>> > >> key.  If you get someone's pubkey and a lot of people you know have
>> > >> signed it, then you can give it more trust.
>> > >> 
>> > >> I signed your pubkey.  Below is the signed version.  Anybody
>> > >> importing that one will see that I have signed it, sort of like
>> > >> vouching for this key. 
>> > >> 
>> > >> owl@thinkpad:~$ gpg --edit-key fretwizzer
>> > >> gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.10; Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>> > >> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
>> > >> There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
>> > >> 
>> > >> 
>> > >> pub  2048R/5ED41E2B  created: 2015-03-23  expires: 2019-03-23  usage: SC  
>> > >>                      trust: full          validity: full
>> > >> sub  2048R/93129FA2  created: 2015-03-23  expires: 2019-03-23  usage: E   
>> > >> [  full  ] (1). Steve Carroll (GPG signing) <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
>> > >> [  full  ] (2)  Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
>> > >> 
>> > >> Command> check
>> > >> uid  Steve Carroll (GPG signing) <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
>> > >> sig!3        5ED41E2B 2015-03-23  [self-signature]
>> > >> sig!         D83A7ECF 2015-04-26  owl (usenet) <owl@rooftop.invalid>
>> > >> uid  Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
>> > >> sig!3        5ED41E2B 2015-03-23  [self-signature]
>> > >> sig!         D83A7ECF 2015-04-26  owl (usenet) <owl@rooftop.invalid>
>> > >> 
>> > >> Command> quit
>> > >> owl@thinkpad:~$ 
>> > >> 
>> > >> Your pubkey with my signature, showing that I vouch for the key: 
>> > >> 
>> > >> -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
>> > >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
>> > >> 
>> > >> mQENBFUQLckBCADQ5m8yvsb7TKlV3fNJtg6neTu8cpzIgffWR6LqlRhBbAdTGh4n
>> > >> Tu2mDEa4LPH+r0BICQtEbMEXsHBgd9c4R8QkQz0Ugjc1R7zpfDDGZZ51Ke2ol+bY
>> > >> QA1ssenYBdsMxFMY9CD28xhIx4D/QzRgKv8Xtfozyt0kvcjuOI6ruFtFchsidiz3
>> > >> bQAYBkzcIxN5bsUtRnUagrMB2+VMgwfPgIXSUMtDLpkQTF0MjzsLKaxuh1SBpXAS
>> > >> nJwuQndgrY6jiv78CBJNfWKK8Ouj6l3O3iita7bV+cmgdSxqAEUAWgZj926aJtH0
>> > >> jjyesS7aersDse182FYLzUFowajG8+tRy0ELABEBAAG0MlN0ZXZlIENhcnJvbGwg
>> > >> KEdQRyBzaWduaW5nKSA8ZnJldHdpenplckBnbWFpbC5jb20+iQFABBMBCgAqAhsD
>> > >> BQkHhh+ABQsJCAcDBRUKCQgLBRYCAwEAAh4BAheABQJVEDLnAhkBAAoJEKLThH5e
>> > >> 1B4rXpsH/jtQ+MpPdbq/qUR+ahlbI1UIqrhGnoudIWL6OBqRn2+fti+xxemhNb9I
>> > >> 1HxzgZJ4ZMHNU9gkLWVg7OsIsNb09qJpULHECJ2VLTx93wOMAV57koH3E2wnO7tD
>> > >> rmLoCfx5LbuIHg6QFhsYV+XcLH8OlcVPZwkrwUNKd8nL7oHPWyTTO1vFdRT+GNRX
>> > >> sBNwFRc9dM928q7Vr1DYGPmlekSCSXMN6pdvWeQ7lqbq0KU+rlZPkA0o1BKEdT7A
>> > >> n0TTRBBKMte8bzDWqxIMbMiqXJT8CrH+W27oKq1UxRt6CwyttY62Oca2UzAkz4K0
>> > >> cCE/qaqQ09C0UFu3i+7zzHGjz7VtP1SJARwEEAECAAYFAlU9URgACgkQAkoOHNg6
>> > >> fs+ttAgAnmFuLqbCsNQryshj07LmTut/tqZjpeyBkFdZ/YHM1zBijGBz3OnmDaLR
>> > >> kfHwDIi+VLYVAiHNbYivRNa1vgvqtIJiR7/Z9+4jD98M24JRZHU1gaqs/AzLOtJH
>> > >> 5vG6+ns/DEMCE6JigEbR122ulkxpc+5Ej64AnuBkxtfSzdLFi1ntzmRWBB7gofWp
>> > >> la97odN72aHj7e1t+0ihRJt8iu1vEiFYGaLeJsdGRsV4UWLvKZRz3V3KzNdCX+bS
>> > >> 97FUViaINrtWCDiTVZIZHC2eN15fn7JnJ4cuT2BLxT06tH8liZddoxiasFLR7OJG
>> > >> OxquVU0djs/8kKIlhab+EAe0V9vDFbQ6U3RldmUgQ2Fycm9sbCAoRG8geW91IGhl
>> > >> YXIgbWUgbm93PykgPGZyZXR3aXp6ZXJAZ21haWwuY29tPokBPQQTAQoAJwIbAwUJ
>> > >> B4YfgAULCQgHAwUVCgkICwUWAgMBAAIeAQIXgAUCVRAy5wAKCRCi04R+XtQeK1xa
>> > >> B/9x8dAkaZArxsf+NGOO9VuoHJJIX1eQaZQK6DMxORQHU3zsF8mgboGNNvljFUo2
>> > >> B10RlZD/2mgj7wVd7CB79UFraQcB+iTGgQGjHa0HYGrjLaNiA0W+Ifm1B0Me/aMR
>> > >> 8JEF1qkdMFnuglETFxRhgpLZXwuVjvoOPuOCCtXWVvd0uFKAws3/fzpw+TIwowgF
>> > >> EWcVmhAjmDLvVCPcV5G14K8JAFvrKcuvm1DNcSsu6o3uPhmgTI+ZghO/+tw0svGi
>> > >> 8r96SmAbuSsyKFuDD6Z7MdoGaxLP1VkOK0XmUga/m+l6wnRmZtcsVsUA8nSP1O88
>> > >> tWab6dIMOfKaKR9vOE5clvP6iQEcBBABAgAGBQJVPVEYAAoJEAJKDhzYOn7PneUH
>> > >> /icCck+ToL0m0PYnkpvU8syCT2JanzeqJlQpDuYu/IBnwjisuJBcpplAOERiegat
>> > >> fKlqEdLE0SDGdqa86nLD5FrTbEcsWqkSW0e3k0ixh+TnVsOacaJVKd4q5J2gjxE1
>> > >> 0R3tA/9ZJdoNJDbWcA73TXpGmZQs6MhGv4MNBe8xfLEAXSDXp0vSpjvblpodSf9K
>> > >> JzkQqyhINioeZiLu0EeVy14kD86+qt/RR8YV7BmAeExe09UTTcBTeQ8x0reEqlKd
>> > >> 7fb7QgfoH2Wd4AkAnBF1Yw7nA8SS3/fVCF6p37cJzTG7qKJnxwLEkJqBDsl2Fkyg
>> > >> 4XNnWCQzRIONZFoyVHhJLGu5AQ0EVRAtyQEIAMmCXdaZT0xabB41R1R3klH8/q70
>> > >> UcupsnnVHoPD+26bKrQnvSF59wkxtlR7GkGE/zW6ekEG2rqX5A2DS5Ua9B7XBLbC
>> > >> 09VhNNndamtBv3OVRkn8gxfxkNJ23agfgcqWBwIWzVvSKMuKo/Jn1A0ZycWkjyZq
>> > >> apPWT05lZPQMtsTWpjqtsVyknUEPZ6C4yUm1ZSDFmeU43AMnAW48HsynNdjoqZC7
>> > >> 0NvVHNvkknH1th28M7BJA//vgvpXlswuGr261CS1+YDD85gEAujyAdmD3YVfEmLa
>> > >> qo3C30aqQzFPOSFh6/S2NQOPisMNms18gVyu6hIuiSArl2FN0TTRKmcLnUEAEQEA
>> > >> AYkBJQQYAQoADwUCVRAtyQIbDAUJB4YfgAAKCRCi04R+XtQeK6rLCACEz/5KHqLQ
>> > >> 1Dy7UI2sqf4O5OSMozkdR8d/jfqvO8IJl1mfxgZoWAC1rPcYoatFUFBS23s+0yQ5
>> > >> gQRvUEiMIWoO4iEFuDHtSwjkP/iFacQZPE4MbUDUSqk4hmUXiDd52oEj8PtXTIHB
>> > >> NXxG8RDbM23Gi0lgjmL4EpERsJ3cQQ1JnxIyg+AqTa6BfiiidQZ+Ssnk1iI8jxgf
>> > >> iUFG2xtVOyXlPWE5oOFX+25B/f3o9SBmk8zNozGvwJ2Ezry++RBFM4v9AuTmfNwq
>> > >> 4whw41O2Q4Oen85ZlViwwfvfMNcqTP/ACUBtgbE9BsPLwwDTxPIvsBwy6lCROYR7
>> > >> X3XBJ7x68hqF
>> > >> =VKJW
>> > >> -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
>> > 
>> > > I updated both our keys but see no difference. Do I need to import this into my keychain?
>> > 
>> > Yes.  Well, you don't *need* to.  Only if you want your pubkey to show
>> > that I have signed it and vouch for it, which doesn't really matter, since
>> > i'm just a usenet nym :)  and in real life that won't carry much weight.
>> > But at least for posts in cola anyone importing that key will see that
>> > I have signed it.  Other regulars could sign it as well, giving it more
>> > weight.  But that's all irrelevant to anyone who already has and trusts
>> > your original pubkey.  It will function properly for verifying your
>> > signature.
>> > 
>> > > Or do I even get a visual that my key has been vouched for by another person? How do I vouch for yours?
>> > 
>> > To see that I have signed your key, import the signed pubkey above.
>> > Then run:
>> > gpg --edit-key fretwizzer
>> > 
>> > At the "Command>" prompt, type "check"
>> > 
>> > That will show my signature on your key.
>> > 
>> > as above, where I ran check on your key after signing it:
>> > >> Command> check
>> > >> uid  Steve Carroll (GPG signing) <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
>> > >> sig!3        5ED41E2B 2015-03-23  [self-signature]
>> > >> sig!         D83A7ECF 2015-04-26  owl (usenet) <owl@rooftop.invalid>
>> > >> uid  Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
>> > >> sig!3        5ED41E2B 2015-03-23  [self-signature]
>> > >> sig!         D83A7ECF 2015-04-26  owl (usenet) <owl@rooftop.invalid>
>> > 
>> > 
>> > To sign my key, run:
>> > gpg --edit-key owl
>> > 
>> > then at the Command> prompt, type "sign"
>> > 
>> > you can also type "trust" at the Command prompt and set a trust level
>> > that you have for my key.
>> > 
>> > Type "quit" to exit gpg.
>> 
>> I see your verification (in the CLI). I 'signed' yours using the GUI app. Unless I'm missing something, it seems weird that I can't see who has verified mine in the GUI app.

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512

> Scratch that, I think I see where it's showing it in the GUI.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org

> iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVPWEwAAoJEKLThH5e1B4rVycH/11NSZcsMoAgmhLTd5bhcxsL
> SNEWUdqVXNEAz+ZwK1skue6LJNR3/QWd+FtOrg69Xm+SrJ/sEEXs2UmswH752Rti
> nE9hTqEvbgsIhQ3hXeLpgT69zck87fjjR2l2Dg4/FsakSJa/fa+adAtE/Eg2Ylk8
> r6bK8GgaclOApizV9TYAwDiivXrtOHolNPcqCvDdC7jgFYdCfGeyNJ9lrqxK1qss
> 6F0rZ0670xQqxvuzIQYAHuJG2eC0makDJXrAtZORAgkbAH8lYx+oXKD+1c1gpGlN
> VxobRjAkqCiizsNOUl1SNscmUILvQ/0Re0fZmBK2/I/OsaVyY2rj74hlPbPibuo=
> =dqAu
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Good signature:

owl@thinkpad:~$ cat steve.txt
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Scratch that, I think I see where it's showing it in the GUI.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVPWEwAAoJEKLThH5e1B4rVycH/11NSZcsMoAgmhLTd5bhcxsL
SNEWUdqVXNEAz+ZwK1skue6LJNR3/QWd+FtOrg69Xm+SrJ/sEEXs2UmswH752Rti
nE9hTqEvbgsIhQ3hXeLpgT69zck87fjjR2l2Dg4/FsakSJa/fa+adAtE/Eg2Ylk8
r6bK8GgaclOApizV9TYAwDiivXrtOHolNPcqCvDdC7jgFYdCfGeyNJ9lrqxK1qss
6F0rZ0670xQqxvuzIQYAHuJG2eC0makDJXrAtZORAgkbAH8lYx+oXKD+1c1gpGlN
VxobRjAkqCiizsNOUl1SNscmUILvQ/0Re0fZmBK2/I/OsaVyY2rj74hlPbPibuo=
=dqAu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

owl@thinkpad:~$ gpg --verify steve.txt
gpg: Signature made Sun 26 Apr 2015 06:05:36 PM EDT using RSA key ID 5ED41E2B
gpg: Good signature from "Steve Carroll (GPG signing) <fretwizzer@gmail.com>"
gpg:                 aka "Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com>"
owl@thinkpad:~$

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-23 11:40 -0700
  Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-23 11:46 -0700
  Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-23 15:12 -0400
    Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-23 12:23 -0700
    Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-23 12:59 -0700
      Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-23 15:49 -0700
        Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-23 20:41 -0400
        Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-23 21:44 -0700
          Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-04-24 04:31 -0700
            Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-24 10:30 -0700
              Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-24 20:08 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-25 10:49 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-25 18:40 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-25 11:53 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-25 19:18 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-25 12:25 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 09:54 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 17:30 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 10:43 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 11:29 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 18:49 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 12:23 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 12:48 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 19:55 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 13:25 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 13:33 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 14:00 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 21:22 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 14:32 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 21:50 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 15:01 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 15:05 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 22:35 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 14:35 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 14:40 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 22:09 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 15:21 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 15:21 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 22:40 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 15:47 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 22:51 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 15:49 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 22:56 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 16:00 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 23:32 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 16:46 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 00:00 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 17:02 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 17:08 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 00:47 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 18:14 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 01:41 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 19:04 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 02:32 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 19:38 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 02:46 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 19:59 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 03:21 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 20:38 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 20:45 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 03:58 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 21:04 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 21:06 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 21:12 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 04:20 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 03:55 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 20:57 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 04:02 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 20:59 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 04:04 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 19:01 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 19:11 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 19:47 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 17:11 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 20:06 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 20:47 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 12:40 -0700

csiph-web