Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #592753

Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts

Show all headers | View raw

benj wrote:
> On 8/10/2016 8:16 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>> On 8/10/2016 5:43 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>> On 8/10/2016 1:24 PM, hanson wrote:
>>>>>> Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll
>>>>>> posts:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Aviation Consultant <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote :
>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Jim Pennino , jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Full Swine Glazier reber g=emc^2, the Cretin wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i count 7.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> The Full Swine Reber Glazier can start by counting himself as #1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Basically few with any knowledge or education will post here
>>>>>>>>>>>> because of
>>>>>>>>>>>> the paid disruptors. And that is what is desired so that the
>>>>>>>>>>>> establishment dogma is maintained and any intelligent discussions
of
>>>>>>>>>>>> non-politically correct "forbidden" subjects get ridiculed and
>>>>>>>>>>>> hounded
>>>>>>>>>>>> until they give up. Trolls are pros so they never give up.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Aviation Consultant Jim Pennino , jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Kook babble: "paid disruptors", "establishment dogma",
>>>>>>>>>>> ""forbidden" subjects"
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hey air-boy, JP, I never said I wasn't one of the 7. I"m just not
>>>>>>>>>> number
>>>>>>>>>> one, sadly. Still filling your stash with Federal Reserve notes
>>>>>>>>>> thinking
>>>>>>>>>> you are rich? Too funny.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Aviation Consultant Jim Pennino , jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>> I never said you were.
>>>>>>>>> Accumlating cash money is stupid on many levels; have you ever heard
of
>>>>>>>>> high yield, no load mutual funds?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Yes I have and even better, such pieces of paper actually resent real
>>>>>>>> physical objects (companies, their assets, trademarks, and other real
>>>>>>>> objects of worth...as opposed to cash money which represents
ownership
>>>>>>>> in hot air and debt.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Aviation Consultant Jim Pennino , jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>> Cash money represents the collective willingness to exchange it for
>>>>>>> goods and services.
>>>>>>> Only the ignorant and kooks thing it has to be backed by gold bars in
>>>>>>> some vault.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> hanson wrote:
>>>>>> There seem to be different strokes from, for and by different folks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> TV-News channels air commercials, every day, where Gold-holding
>>>>>> Companies sell their precious & stable gold to you in exchange for
>>>>>> your worthless paper money that you earn, hold and saved.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> How do these companies stay in business with all that worthless
>>>>>> paper money in their coffers, while you own & hold their gold? LOL
>>>>>
>>>>> So how do fraudsters and con men (like say Madoff) get all those
>>>>> mansions and live such a high life when he really had absolutely nothing
>>>>> of value to back it up?
>>>>
>>>> He sold, for that cash you call worthless, stock and other equities that
>>>> didn't actually exist.
>>>
>>> So obviously things that have zero intrinsic worth like cash and
>>> imaginary stocks actually are able to give you massive real wealth
>>> (money is not wealth, it is the opposite of wealth).
>>>
>>> So the secret of the money system is never getting caught?
>>
>> No, kook, that is NOT how it is at all.
>>
>> How a legitimate broker works: Investors give their cash, which you call
>> worthless, to the broker who then uses all the investor's money to buy
>> and sell, hopefully at a profit, investment instruments such as stocks,
>> bonds, futures, contracts, etc. The broker sends the investors a regular
>> statement of their investments current worth.
>>
>> How Madoff did it: Investors gave Madoff their cash, which you call
>> worthless, and then Madoff just tucked the money away without doing
>> anything with it. He then sent regular phoney statements showing the
>> investment was returning far more then any current legitimate investment.
>> This induced his suckers to tell everyone they knew what a great broker
>> Madoff was and resulted in lots more suckers. If someone wanted to get
>> the regular profits, Madoff sent them the money out of all the money
>> he had squirreled away. Since Madoff made no investments and their were
>> no profits, the only source of cash was new investors. Eventually the
>> whole thing came tumbling down when he was unable to pay anyone off.
>>
>> This is called a Ponzi scheme and has absouletly nothing to do with the
>> quaint archaic idea that money has to be backed by metal bars in a vault.
>
> So you can't see that the money scheme is identical to the Madoff scheme
> except for the "tumbling down" part. That will come later. So you are
> totally willing to trade actual things you own of value for some pieces
> of paper backed only by the "faith and credit of those printing them?
> If you want to see what that "faith and credit" is worth go find and old
> silver certificate and try to get the issuer to redeem it in silver just
> as it says on that piece of paper. Prepare to be disappointed in how
> honest and trustworthy those people are. I mean we all agree that the
> idea of actually paying debts is "archaic" right?

Why do you think money was invented?  I have a product which you want.
How are you going to convince me to give it to you?

/BAH

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-08-06 12:11 +0000
  Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-06 10:41 -0700
    Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-06 13:43 -0500
    Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-08-06 12:40 -0700
      Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-06 16:13 -0400
        Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-06 21:33 +0000
          Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-06 19:23 -0400
            Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-06 23:39 +0000
              Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-06 19:33 -0500
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-07 01:00 +0000
              Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-08 18:04 -0400
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-08 23:11 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-08-10 10:24 -0700
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-10 17:13 -0400
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-10 21:43 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-10 18:30 -0400
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-11 00:16 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-10 21:49 -0400
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-08-11 13:03 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-11 06:10 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-11 17:39 -0400
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-11 22:14 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-11 22:22 -0400
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-12 03:48 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-08-12 10:17 -0700
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-12 16:02 -0400
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-12 21:20 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-12 19:40 -0400
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-12 18:56 -0500
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-08-12 17:01 -0700
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-12 20:43 -0400
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-08-12 18:36 -0700
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-13 02:46 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-13 00:14 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-12 20:38 -0400
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-13 02:47 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-13 19:30 -0400
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-14 00:47 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-13 21:48 -0400
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-14 04:57 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-13 17:03 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-10 19:31 -0500
    Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-08-07 20:12 +0000
  Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-08-06 12:39 -0700
    Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-08-07 08:38 -0700
  Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-08-07 13:50 -0700

csiph-web