Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #592752
| From | bartekltg <bartekltg@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: The New Gravity Theory |
| Date | 2016-08-11 13:16 +0200 |
| Organization | ATMAN - ATM S.A. |
| Message-ID | <nohmqa$1rg$1@node1.news.atman.pl> (permalink) |
| References | <l1mnqb9f0ruha4p83dd8g0idbnqrtuth56@4ax.com> |
On 11.08.2016 04:14, Michael J. Strickland wrote: > Gravity results from an imbalance in the gravitational flux (gravitons > if you will) on a line between two massive objects. A solitary mass > sources a flux of gravitons which imparts momentum to anything they > hit. The universe imparts equal momentum to this solitary mass on all > sides so it has no net force on it. > > Two objects placed near each other occult (block/eclipse) some of this > ambient flux coming from the remainder of the masses in the universe. > This occulting is proportional to the product of their cross section > area (pi*r^2) and the linear thickness of matter this flux must > traverse. It is also inversely proportional to the distance between > the two masses squared (R^2). > > The math/geometry is correct, the only question: > > Is this a more useful model? Banj mentioned Feynman-Wheeler theory. The gravitatiopnal version is Hoyle–Narlikar theory (probably one of many) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoyle%E2%80%93Narlikar_theory_of_gravity But for me your theory looks more like Le Sage's theory of gravitation. There is a flux of particles (thermalized or not)/waves/radiation in all directions, mass is shielding this flux so the other mass is in a "shadow" and get less pressure from the direction od the first mass. It was proposed ot the end of XVII century, the main contribution was done in XVIII, and the theory, under different modifications, was investigated by many scientist, including quite good ones. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Sage%27s_theory_of_gravitation Read especially criticism and problems with this theory, so you would known what you need to fix. bartekltg
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The New Gravity Theory Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-10 22:14 -0400
Re: The New Gravity Theory benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-10 22:36 -0400
Re: Re: The New Gravity Theory Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-11 05:34 -0400
Re: The New Gravity Theory Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 20:30 -0700
Re: Re: The New Gravity Theory Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-11 05:29 -0400
Re: The New Gravity Theory bartekltg <bartekltg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 13:16 +0200
Re: The New Gravity Theory john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 06:41 -0700
Re: The New Gravity Theory bartekltg <bartekltg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 16:29 +0200
Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 09:35 -0500
Re: The New Gravity Theory john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 08:11 -0700
Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 10:49 -0500
Re: The New Gravity Theory john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 09:14 -0700
Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 11:28 -0500
Re: The New Gravity Theory moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-11 17:48 +0000
Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 13:21 -0500
Re: The New Gravity Theory benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-11 18:20 -0400
Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 17:35 -0500
Re: The New Gravity Theory benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-11 22:30 -0400
Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-12 07:27 -0500
Re: The New Gravity Theory john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 11:24 -0700
Re: The New Gravity Theory moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-12 15:36 +0000
"theory of **** noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-12 12:38 -0700
"theory of **** john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-12 16:22 -0700
"theory of **** john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-12 19:33 -0700
Re: "theory of **** moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-13 03:11 +0000
Re: "theory of **** john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 08:06 -0700
Re: "theory of **** Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 11:40 -0500
Re: "theory of **** moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-13 17:23 +0000
"theory of ideal gasses & beyond them noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 10:30 -0700
Re: The New Gravity Theory margaretporat@gmail.com - 2016-08-15 01:58 -0700
Re: The New Gravity Theory benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-11 17:59 -0400
Re: The New Gravity Theory john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 16:18 -0700
Re: The New Gravity Theory bartekltg <bartekltg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-12 14:45 +0200
Re: The New Gravity Theory LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 10:10 -0700
Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 12:38 -0500
Re: The New Gravity Theory LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 11:05 -0700
Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 13:30 -0500
Re: The New Gravity Theory john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 11:47 -0700
Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 14:19 -0500
Re: The New Gravity Theory john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 13:21 -0700
Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 15:47 -0500
Re: The New Gravity Theory xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-11 13:55 -0700
Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 16:32 -0500
Re: The New Gravity Theory moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-12 15:50 +0000
Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-12 10:59 -0500
Re: The New Gravity Theory benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-11 18:31 -0400
Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 17:39 -0500
Re: The New Gravity Theory noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 13:43 -0700
Re: The New Gravity Theory LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 15:40 -0700
Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 17:45 -0500
Re: The New Gravity Theory LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 16:37 -0700
Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 19:10 -0500
Re: The New Gravity Theory LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 17:31 -0700
Re: The New Gravity Theory poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-08-12 02:54 -0700
Re: The New Gravity Theory Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-08-14 10:35 +0200
Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 08:17 -0500
Re: The New Gravity Theory Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-08-15 21:19 +0200
Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-16 13:26 -0500
Re: The New Gravity Theory moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-16 19:17 +0000
Re: The New Gravity Theory Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-08-16 12:44 -0700
Re: The New Gravity Theory noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-16 14:54 -0700
Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 13:52 -0500
zero thus defined noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-19 11:08 -0700
Re: The New Gravity Theory poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-08-19 23:07 -0700
Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 10:14 -0500
Re: The New Gravity Theory benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-20 20:59 -0400
Re: The New Gravity Theory poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-08-20 23:00 -0700
Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 18:12 -0500
Re: The New Gravity Theory poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-08-21 23:31 -0700
it's a military-marhcing theme noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 15:43 -0700
Re: it's a military-marhcing theme LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 16:28 -0700
Re: Re: The New Gravity Theory Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-12 04:59 -0400
Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-12 10:38 -0500
Re: The New Gravity Theory poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-08-12 23:35 -0700
Re: Re: The New Gravity Theory Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-14 20:07 -0400
Re: The New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 08:43 -0500
Re: The New Gravity Theory poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-08-12 02:49 -0700
Re: The New Gravity Theory poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-08-12 02:39 -0700
Re: Re: The New Gravity Theory Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-12 06:41 -0400
Re: Re: The New Gravity Theory poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-08-12 08:49 -0700
Re: The New Gravity Theory poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-08-12 04:28 -0700
Re: The New Gravity Theory poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-08-12 23:34 -0700
skwaresville noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 10:35 -0700
skwaresville john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 15:03 -0700
Re: skwaresville moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-14 00:50 +0000
Re: skwaresville poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-08-14 00:04 -0700
Re: The New Gravity Theory xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-13 18:30 -0700
Re: The New Gravity Theory benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-13 21:50 -0400
Re: The New Gravity Theory xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-14 10:29 -0700
Re: Re: The New Gravity Theory Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-14 20:11 -0400
Re: Re: The New Gravity Theory xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-14 17:46 -0700
Re: Re: The New Gravity Theory poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-08-14 23:54 -0700
Re: Re: The New Gravity Theory xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-15 05:52 -0700
csiph-web