Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #593025
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts |
| Date | 2016-08-13 17:03 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <5g048d-tl7.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <57ae2b56$0$55835$c3e8da3$33881b6a@news.astraweb.com> <k5r18d-sd.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <57ae5e79$0$31335$c3e8da3$dd9697d2@news.astraweb.com> <pc528d-ak1.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <57ae6c18$0$13148$c3e8da3$cc4fe22d@news.astraweb.com> |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > Actually the now and much more powerful secret HAARP (assuming those > first low power (How is megawatts of atmospheric heating "low power") > tests were encouraging) is underway using black budget and secret > location. You have no need to know. Just keep shuffling your papers and > sucking tax dollars. If HAARP was a fail then we'll pretend that the > money wasn't wasted. Actually the next set of USAF experiments has nothing to do with power, it has to do with dispersing ionized gas from CubeSats in an attempt to improve HF propagation, kook. http://www.arrl.org/news/now-free-of-haarp-us-air-force-still-wants-to-tinker-with-the-ionosphere By the way, kook, no experiment is a "fail", including those that come to negative conclusions, such as there is no such thing as remore viewing. -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-08-06 12:11 +0000
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-06 10:41 -0700
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-06 13:43 -0500
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-08-06 12:40 -0700
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-06 16:13 -0400
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-06 21:33 +0000
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-06 19:23 -0400
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-06 23:39 +0000
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-06 19:33 -0500
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-07 01:00 +0000
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-08 18:04 -0400
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-08 23:11 +0000
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-08-10 10:24 -0700
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-10 17:13 -0400
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-10 21:43 +0000
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-10 18:30 -0400
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-11 00:16 +0000
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-10 21:49 -0400
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-08-11 13:03 +0000
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-11 06:10 +0000
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-11 17:39 -0400
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-11 22:14 +0000
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-11 22:22 -0400
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-12 03:48 +0000
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-08-12 10:17 -0700
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-12 16:02 -0400
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-12 21:20 +0000
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-12 19:40 -0400
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-12 18:56 -0500
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-08-12 17:01 -0700
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-12 20:43 -0400
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-08-12 18:36 -0700
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-13 02:46 +0000
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-13 00:14 +0000
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-12 20:38 -0400
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-13 02:47 +0000
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-13 19:30 -0400
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-14 00:47 +0000
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-13 21:48 -0400
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-14 04:57 +0000
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-13 17:03 +0000
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-10 19:31 -0500
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-08-07 20:12 +0000
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-08-06 12:39 -0700
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-08-07 08:38 -0700
Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-08-07 13:50 -0700
csiph-web