Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts
Date	2016-08-10 21:43 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<qpjs7d-emb.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References	(6 earlier) <p29i7d-rf6.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <57a901eb$0$29121$c3e8da3$38634283@news.astraweb.com> <b5gn7d-p2o.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <nofo06$7v7$1@dont-email.me> <57ab98ec$0$27013$c3e8da3$5d8fb80f@news.astraweb.com>

Show all headers | View raw

benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> On 8/10/2016 1:24 PM, hanson wrote:
>> Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll
>> posts:
>>>
>> Aviation Consultant <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote :
>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>> Jim Pennino , jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>> Full Swine Glazier reber g=emc^2, the Cretin wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> i count 7.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> The Full Swine Reber Glazier can start by counting himself as #1.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Basically few with any knowledge or education will post here
>>>>>>>> because of
>>>>>>>> the paid disruptors. And that is what is desired so that the
>>>>>>>> establishment dogma is maintained and any intelligent discussions of
>>>>>>>> non-politically correct "forbidden" subjects get ridiculed and
>>>>>>>> hounded
>>>>>>>> until they give up. Trolls are pros so they never give up.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Aviation Consultant Jim Pennino , jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>> Kook babble: "paid disruptors", "establishment dogma",
>>>>>>> ""forbidden" subjects"
>>>>>>
>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>> Hey air-boy, JP, I never said I wasn't one of the 7. I"m just not
>>>>>> number
>>>>>> one, sadly. Still filling your stash with Federal Reserve notes
>>>>>> thinking
>>>>>> you are rich? Too funny.
>>>>>
>>>> Aviation Consultant Jim Pennino , jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>> I never said you were.
>>>>> Accumlating cash money is stupid on many levels; have you ever heard of
>>>>> high yield, no load mutual funds?
>>>>
>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>> Yes I have and even better, such pieces of paper actually resent real
>>>> physical objects (companies, their assets, trademarks, and other real
>>>> objects of worth...as opposed to cash money which represents ownership
>>>> in hot air and debt.
>>>
>> Aviation Consultant Jim Pennino , jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> Cash money represents the collective willingness to exchange it for
>>> goods and services.
>>> Only the ignorant and kooks thing it has to be backed by gold bars in
>>> some vault.
>>>
>> hanson wrote:
>> There seem to be different strokes from, for and by different folks.
>>>
>> TV-News channels air commercials, every day, where Gold-holding
>> Companies sell their precious & stable gold to you in exchange for
>> your worthless paper money that you earn, hold and saved.
>>>
>> How do these companies stay in business with all that worthless
>> paper money in their coffers, while you own & hold their gold? LOL
> 
> So how do fraudsters and con men (like say Madoff) get all those 
> mansions and live such a high life when he really had absolutely nothing 
> of value to back it up? 

He sold, for that cash you call worthless, stock and other equities that
didn't actually exist.



-- 
Jim Pennino

Thread

Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-08-06 12:11 +0000
  Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-06 10:41 -0700
    Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-06 13:43 -0500
    Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-08-06 12:40 -0700
      Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-06 16:13 -0400
        Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-06 21:33 +0000
          Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-06 19:23 -0400
            Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-06 23:39 +0000
              Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-06 19:33 -0500
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-07 01:00 +0000
              Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-08 18:04 -0400
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-08 23:11 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-08-10 10:24 -0700
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-10 17:13 -0400
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-10 21:43 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-10 18:30 -0400
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-11 00:16 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-10 21:49 -0400
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-08-11 13:03 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-11 06:10 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-11 17:39 -0400
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-11 22:14 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-11 22:22 -0400
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-12 03:48 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-08-12 10:17 -0700
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-12 16:02 -0400
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-12 21:20 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-12 19:40 -0400
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-12 18:56 -0500
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-08-12 17:01 -0700
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-12 20:43 -0400
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-08-12 18:36 -0700
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-13 02:46 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-13 00:14 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-12 20:38 -0400
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-13 02:47 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-13 19:30 -0400
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-14 00:47 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-13 21:48 -0400
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-14 04:57 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-13 17:03 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-10 19:31 -0500
    Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-08-07 20:12 +0000
  Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-08-06 12:39 -0700
    Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-08-07 08:38 -0700
  Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-08-07 13:50 -0700

csiph-web