Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #291655

Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit)

From Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit)
Date 2015-04-26 14:40 -0700
Message-ID <D162A973.4ACF1%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <bvjf93.ajfi2@rooftop.invalid> <7d4e03c8-0145-49a1-880e-602579bc3813@googlegroups.com> <9e3c361e-cfa9-4a48-b53c-df8f8ed66966@googlegroups.com> <3660c025-c74d-469a-beb2-ddf1ec305a41@googlegroups.com> <bbnvyc83.kajg@rooftop.invalid>

Show all headers | View raw

On 4/26/15, 2:22 PM, in article bbnvyc83.kajg@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
<owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:

> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 2:33:04 PM UTC-6, Steve Carroll wrote:
> 
>> (snip)
> 
>> I just tested it in the browser, I highlighted this...
> 
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA512 
> 
>> This is a signing test.
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
> 
>> iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVPUcAAAoJEKLThH5e1B4r/8oH/2NuIb5h5PqoDhwXeGdQz9/D
>> c6zpKqaLTdPXowVekEmS5CEbQKUBY8hokmaYGOEMaa3DMefIHN38YqWn5vRZ/AFC
>> 4cYPmjgNepDCRn1t1L7gYFxBAuuSvcKiMpbVj3AZ6EFt4XLHsWFF13ojof6PyyBG
>> F9OAlx/jI80PzctWEhMqk2U24OGPMTgkED487ZGtkp2IHHPTLnwG2iwWewecFRUG
>> 9VKO/Fo/nRy5+CsLXDC+Svma/TOhuz7P9utDLiKO+bVTegoSJhPUc5MtvzKHsORi
>> +8RMcXtrqkMZ8NxOpY2Ble9Q3SvCoCBGeUKJEpe8ubkAGAT6AaxLuUKVMgLF/Jg=
>> =WB15 
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
>> ... and I was able to 'verify' it was from me so it seems to be working (in
>> other words, Google isn't munging it). So if this is working correctly... do
>> I have the idea here with this:
> 
>> * I create a key pair and share the public half of it
> 
>> * I write a message and 'sign' it  (like I just quoted)
> 
>> * The end user grabs my public key (one time) and stores it in his GPG
>> keychain
> 
>> * When the end user sees a signed message by me he simply highlights it and
>> can verify it instantly with a mouse click (or however it's done in their
>> system).
> 
>> I emailed myself a signed message and my mail app came back saying it was
>> secure and from me. Seems like that's it, eh? Thanks, dude! I probably never
>> would have gotten around to doing this if not for you, this is definitely a
>> useful thing for a number of reasons. If you know, how secure is this? What's
>> the "the trust level" bit? Is it based on me verifying it in the real world
>> (like a phone call or something)?
> 
> The trust level, you get other people who trust your key to sign your
> key.  If you get someone's pubkey and a lot of people you know have
> signed it, then you can give it more trust.
> 
> I signed your pubkey.  Below is the signed version.  Anybody
> importing that one will see that I have signed it, sort of like
> vouching for this key.
> 
> owl@thinkpad:~$ gpg --edit-key fretwizzer
> gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.10; Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
> There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
> 
> 
> pub  2048R/5ED41E2B  created: 2015-03-23  expires: 2019-03-23  usage: SC
>                      trust: full          validity: full
> sub  2048R/93129FA2  created: 2015-03-23  expires: 2019-03-23  usage: E
> [  full  ] (1). Steve Carroll (GPG signing) <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
> [  full  ] (2)  Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
> 
> Command> check
> uid  Steve Carroll (GPG signing) <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
> sig!3        5ED41E2B 2015-03-23  [self-signature]
> sig!         D83A7ECF 2015-04-26  owl (usenet) <owl@rooftop.invalid>
> uid  Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
> sig!3        5ED41E2B 2015-03-23  [self-signature]
> sig!         D83A7ECF 2015-04-26  owl (usenet) <owl@rooftop.invalid>
> 
> Command> quit
> owl@thinkpad:~$ 
> 
> Your pubkey with my signature, showing that I vouch for the key:
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> mQENBFUQLckBCADQ5m8yvsb7TKlV3fNJtg6neTu8cpzIgffWR6LqlRhBbAdTGh4n
> Tu2mDEa4LPH+r0BICQtEbMEXsHBgd9c4R8QkQz0Ugjc1R7zpfDDGZZ51Ke2ol+bY
> QA1ssenYBdsMxFMY9CD28xhIx4D/QzRgKv8Xtfozyt0kvcjuOI6ruFtFchsidiz3
> bQAYBkzcIxN5bsUtRnUagrMB2+VMgwfPgIXSUMtDLpkQTF0MjzsLKaxuh1SBpXAS
> nJwuQndgrY6jiv78CBJNfWKK8Ouj6l3O3iita7bV+cmgdSxqAEUAWgZj926aJtH0
> jjyesS7aersDse182FYLzUFowajG8+tRy0ELABEBAAG0MlN0ZXZlIENhcnJvbGwg
> KEdQRyBzaWduaW5nKSA8ZnJldHdpenplckBnbWFpbC5jb20+iQFABBMBCgAqAhsD
> BQkHhh+ABQsJCAcDBRUKCQgLBRYCAwEAAh4BAheABQJVEDLnAhkBAAoJEKLThH5e
> 1B4rXpsH/jtQ+MpPdbq/qUR+ahlbI1UIqrhGnoudIWL6OBqRn2+fti+xxemhNb9I
> 1HxzgZJ4ZMHNU9gkLWVg7OsIsNb09qJpULHECJ2VLTx93wOMAV57koH3E2wnO7tD
> rmLoCfx5LbuIHg6QFhsYV+XcLH8OlcVPZwkrwUNKd8nL7oHPWyTTO1vFdRT+GNRX
> sBNwFRc9dM928q7Vr1DYGPmlekSCSXMN6pdvWeQ7lqbq0KU+rlZPkA0o1BKEdT7A
> n0TTRBBKMte8bzDWqxIMbMiqXJT8CrH+W27oKq1UxRt6CwyttY62Oca2UzAkz4K0
> cCE/qaqQ09C0UFu3i+7zzHGjz7VtP1SJARwEEAECAAYFAlU9URgACgkQAkoOHNg6
> fs+ttAgAnmFuLqbCsNQryshj07LmTut/tqZjpeyBkFdZ/YHM1zBijGBz3OnmDaLR
> kfHwDIi+VLYVAiHNbYivRNa1vgvqtIJiR7/Z9+4jD98M24JRZHU1gaqs/AzLOtJH
> 5vG6+ns/DEMCE6JigEbR122ulkxpc+5Ej64AnuBkxtfSzdLFi1ntzmRWBB7gofWp
> la97odN72aHj7e1t+0ihRJt8iu1vEiFYGaLeJsdGRsV4UWLvKZRz3V3KzNdCX+bS
> 97FUViaINrtWCDiTVZIZHC2eN15fn7JnJ4cuT2BLxT06tH8liZddoxiasFLR7OJG
> OxquVU0djs/8kKIlhab+EAe0V9vDFbQ6U3RldmUgQ2Fycm9sbCAoRG8geW91IGhl
> YXIgbWUgbm93PykgPGZyZXR3aXp6ZXJAZ21haWwuY29tPokBPQQTAQoAJwIbAwUJ
> B4YfgAULCQgHAwUVCgkICwUWAgMBAAIeAQIXgAUCVRAy5wAKCRCi04R+XtQeK1xa
> B/9x8dAkaZArxsf+NGOO9VuoHJJIX1eQaZQK6DMxORQHU3zsF8mgboGNNvljFUo2
> B10RlZD/2mgj7wVd7CB79UFraQcB+iTGgQGjHa0HYGrjLaNiA0W+Ifm1B0Me/aMR
> 8JEF1qkdMFnuglETFxRhgpLZXwuVjvoOPuOCCtXWVvd0uFKAws3/fzpw+TIwowgF
> EWcVmhAjmDLvVCPcV5G14K8JAFvrKcuvm1DNcSsu6o3uPhmgTI+ZghO/+tw0svGi
> 8r96SmAbuSsyKFuDD6Z7MdoGaxLP1VkOK0XmUga/m+l6wnRmZtcsVsUA8nSP1O88
> tWab6dIMOfKaKR9vOE5clvP6iQEcBBABAgAGBQJVPVEYAAoJEAJKDhzYOn7PneUH
> /icCck+ToL0m0PYnkpvU8syCT2JanzeqJlQpDuYu/IBnwjisuJBcpplAOERiegat
> fKlqEdLE0SDGdqa86nLD5FrTbEcsWqkSW0e3k0ixh+TnVsOacaJVKd4q5J2gjxE1
> 0R3tA/9ZJdoNJDbWcA73TXpGmZQs6MhGv4MNBe8xfLEAXSDXp0vSpjvblpodSf9K
> JzkQqyhINioeZiLu0EeVy14kD86+qt/RR8YV7BmAeExe09UTTcBTeQ8x0reEqlKd
> 7fb7QgfoH2Wd4AkAnBF1Yw7nA8SS3/fVCF6p37cJzTG7qKJnxwLEkJqBDsl2Fkyg
> 4XNnWCQzRIONZFoyVHhJLGu5AQ0EVRAtyQEIAMmCXdaZT0xabB41R1R3klH8/q70
> UcupsnnVHoPD+26bKrQnvSF59wkxtlR7GkGE/zW6ekEG2rqX5A2DS5Ua9B7XBLbC
> 09VhNNndamtBv3OVRkn8gxfxkNJ23agfgcqWBwIWzVvSKMuKo/Jn1A0ZycWkjyZq
> apPWT05lZPQMtsTWpjqtsVyknUEPZ6C4yUm1ZSDFmeU43AMnAW48HsynNdjoqZC7
> 0NvVHNvkknH1th28M7BJA//vgvpXlswuGr261CS1+YDD85gEAujyAdmD3YVfEmLa
> qo3C30aqQzFPOSFh6/S2NQOPisMNms18gVyu6hIuiSArl2FN0TTRKmcLnUEAEQEA
> AYkBJQQYAQoADwUCVRAtyQIbDAUJB4YfgAAKCRCi04R+XtQeK6rLCACEz/5KHqLQ
> 1Dy7UI2sqf4O5OSMozkdR8d/jfqvO8IJl1mfxgZoWAC1rPcYoatFUFBS23s+0yQ5
> gQRvUEiMIWoO4iEFuDHtSwjkP/iFacQZPE4MbUDUSqk4hmUXiDd52oEj8PtXTIHB
> NXxG8RDbM23Gi0lgjmL4EpERsJ3cQQ1JnxIyg+AqTa6BfiiidQZ+Ssnk1iI8jxgf
> iUFG2xtVOyXlPWE5oOFX+25B/f3o9SBmk8zNozGvwJ2Ezry++RBFM4v9AuTmfNwq
> 4whw41O2Q4Oen85ZlViwwfvfMNcqTP/ACUBtgbE9BsPLwwDTxPIvsBwy6lCROYR7
> X3XBJ7x68hqF
> =VKJW
> -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
> 
> 
Funny to see Carroll begging to get help so he can be trusted. :)

In all seriousness, if he actually is willing to do this it would be great.
It would end his nonsense about saying his past posts were "hacked"... if
they were the key would fail. Then again, given how hacking his past posts
is not possible anyway, it is not like he could not just say someone hacked
the key, too.

But it would make his claims even *more* unbelievable. Only people such as
cc and DFS and anyone else he has sucking up to him could claim to believe
him then.

What it will also do, though, is give Carroll a way to even more easily deny
what he calls his "aliases" - his other names and accounts (socks and
secondary accounts). He *mostly* denies these already, though, so not a big
deal.

And, anyway, with the added overhead of doing this it might make him troll
less - so let me go on record as saying that as long as Carroll is going to
continue to post I am 100% for him doing this. Absolutely.


-- 
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1:            <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-23 11:40 -0700
  Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-23 11:46 -0700
  Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-23 15:12 -0400
    Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-23 12:23 -0700
    Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-23 12:59 -0700
      Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-23 15:49 -0700
        Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-23 20:41 -0400
        Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-23 21:44 -0700
          Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-04-24 04:31 -0700
            Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-24 10:30 -0700
              Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-24 20:08 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-25 10:49 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-25 18:40 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-25 11:53 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-25 19:18 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-25 12:25 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 09:54 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 17:30 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 10:43 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 11:29 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 18:49 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 12:23 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 12:48 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 19:55 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 13:25 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 13:33 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 14:00 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 21:22 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 14:32 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 21:50 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 15:01 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 15:05 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 22:35 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 14:35 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 14:40 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 22:09 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 15:21 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 15:21 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 22:40 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 15:47 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 22:51 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 15:49 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 22:56 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 16:00 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 23:32 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 16:46 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 00:00 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 17:02 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 17:08 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 00:47 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 18:14 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 01:41 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 19:04 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 02:32 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 19:38 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 02:46 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 19:59 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 03:21 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 20:38 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 20:45 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 03:58 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 21:04 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 21:06 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 21:12 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 04:20 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 03:55 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 20:57 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 04:02 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 20:59 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 04:04 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 19:01 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 19:11 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 19:47 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 17:11 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 20:06 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 20:47 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 12:40 -0700

csiph-web