Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.vote > #2047
| From | Simon Richter <sjr@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.vote |
| Subject | Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: Re: Willingness to share a position statement? |
| Date | 2021-03-26 01:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <BWId4-2c0-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <BWB1T-5S9-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <BWBXY-6rn-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <BWCr0-6BF-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <BWG1z-Dd-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <BWGXD-1gn-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi, On 25.03.21 23:32, Christian Kastner wrote: >> the "technical" decisions we make based on that also have political >> consequences. > That's taking meaning of the word 'political' in the widest possible > sense, and in that sense, literally any action (or inaction) carried out > by an individual within a society is political, because they all have > consequences. Too some extent, yes: > I interpret the calls for Debian being apolitical (to some degree) as > calls differentiating at least between > (1) whether specific political consequences are intended or not That's one of the key points I was trying to make: Debian very explicitly believes that users should have certain rights, and that creating free software is the most effective way to achieve this. We're absolutely not limited to creating free software because we recognize that this isn't sufficient, as the environment in which the software is to be used is also important for whether users can realize their rights. Therefore, we have done a lot of work besides writing software. Debian was instrumental in getting US "munitions export" law changed to allow the export of cryptographic software, and we have repeatedly taken a stand against software patents. Community building is just another area where we work in the interest of our users, both directly (as the community gives them local support resources) and indirectly (as the community is a source of new contributors). If there are issues within the community that are a hurdle to participation, that is a conflict with our explicit political goal. > (2) how deeply Debian gets involved We are in a prominent position. The OSI's Open Source Definition is derived from the Debian Free Software Guidelines, after all, not the other way 'round. There is no way for us to not be involved in something that affects the whole free software community. > (3) effects are directly or indirectly caused > (4) degree of effect. Indirect effects are often stronger and reach further than direct ones. We're acting inside a complex and interconnected political sphere, and limiting our vision to a small bubble will cause us to miss the bigger picture. Simon
Back to linux.debian.vote | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Willingness to share a position statement? Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@gwolf.org> - 2021-03-24 00:00 +0100
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl> - 2021-03-24 00:30 +0100
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2021-03-24 01:10 +0100
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Matthias Klumpp <mak@debian.org> - 2021-03-24 01:30 +0100
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Sruthi Chandran <srud@disroot.org> - 2021-03-24 08:50 +0100
Re: Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Akhil Varkey <akhilvarkey@disroot.org> - 2021-03-25 10:20 +0100
Re: Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Timo Röhling <timo@gaussglocke.de> - 2021-03-25 23:30 +0100
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> - 2021-03-24 11:00 +0100
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Martina Ferrari <tina@debian.org> - 2021-03-25 00:10 +0100
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2021-03-25 08:00 +0100
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Harlan Lieberman-Berg <hlieberman@setec.io> - 2021-03-24 01:20 +0100
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? M dB <deblanc@riseup.net> - 2021-03-24 01:50 +0100
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Jonathan Carter <jcc@debian.org> - 2021-03-24 23:10 +0100
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> - 2021-03-25 09:50 +0100
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2021-03-25 17:30 +0100
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Martin Pitt <mpitt@debian.org> - 2021-03-25 18:30 +0100
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Ansgar <ansgar@debian.org> - 2021-03-25 18:40 +0100
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2021-03-25 19:00 +0100
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Margarita Manterola <margamanterola@gmail.com> - 2021-03-25 19:20 +0100
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2021-03-25 19:30 +0100
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2021-03-25 19:40 +0100
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2021-03-25 20:10 +0100
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Paulo Henrique de Lima Santana <phls@debian.org> - 2021-03-25 20:20 +0100
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2021-03-25 19:30 +0100
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Gard Spreemann <gspr@nonempty.org> - 2021-03-25 19:30 +0100
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2021-03-25 20:30 +0100
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2021-03-25 20:50 +0100
Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Simon Richter <sjr@debian.org> - 2021-03-25 22:50 +0100
Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Christian Kastner <ckk@debian.org> - 2021-03-25 23:50 +0100
Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Simon Richter <sjr@debian.org> - 2021-03-26 01:10 +0100
Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Christian Kastner <ckk@debian.org> - 2021-03-26 08:50 +0100
Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: Re: Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Simon Richter <sjr@debian.org> - 2021-03-26 09:40 +0100
Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> - 2021-03-26 11:50 +0100
Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2021-03-26 17:00 +0100
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> - 2021-03-25 21:20 +0100
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Sruthi Chandran <srud@disroot.org> - 2021-03-25 21:40 +0100
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Filippo Rusconi <lopippo@debian.org> - 2021-03-26 00:30 +0100
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> - 2021-03-25 18:10 +0100
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? (rms-open-letter) Bart Martens <bartm@debian.org> - 2021-03-25 11:50 +0100
Question to Jonathan: What did you Mean Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2021-03-25 17:00 +0100
Re: Question to Jonathan: What did you Mean Jonathan Carter <jcc@debian.org> - 2021-03-25 18:20 +0100
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Sruthi Chandran <srud@disroot.org> - 2021-03-24 09:10 +0100
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> - 2021-03-24 14:10 +0100
csiph-web