Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #527564

Re: The Ensemble Interpretation.

From Dale <dale@dalekelly.org>
Newsgroups sci.physics, alt.atheism, alt.philosophy, alt.talk.creationism, sci.logic, sci.skeptic
Subject Re: The Ensemble Interpretation.
Date 2015-10-22 20:40 -0400
Message-ID <8s8l79.d6e.19.3@news.alt.net> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <8s66ok.fq8.17.1@news.alt.net> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Oct.21{11.47P.Seattle.2015}> <d8rj5jFgptdU1@mid.individual.net> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Oct.22{2.59A.Seattle.2015}> <d8tdhdFt15U1@mid.individual.net>

Cross-posted to 6 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 10/22/2015 08:32 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:
> On 22/10/2015 8:59 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>> Sylvia_Else wrote: > there is no underlying process about which we
>> could, > in principle, have knowledge, and thereby be able to > look
>> behind the randomness [of quantum mechanics]. Ignorance is ignorance,
>> Sylvia, no matter if the truth is attainable or not.
>
> There's a distinction between a truth that exists, but is not
> discoverable, and a truth that is simply non-existent. Applying the
> unqualified word "ignorance" in the latter case is rather unhelpful.
>
> For example, we do not know the highest prime number. This is not a case
> of ignorance - the reason we do not know it is that there is no such thing.


aren't the prime numbers a set whose cardinality is countable?




>
> This seems to be case with quantum mechanics. Our inability to predict
> the outcome of a quantum interaction is not due to our failing to know
> something about the internal state of the particles involved, but arises
> because there is nothing there to know. The result is random, and that's
> all that can be said about it.

not knowing doesn't equate with a definition?



>
> Sylvia
>


-- 
Dale
http://www.dalekelly.org

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

rolling dice is not random? Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-10-21 17:47 -0400
  Re: rolling dice is not random? Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-21 22:13 +0000
  Re: rolling dice is not random? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-21 22:22 +0000
    Re: rolling dice is not random? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 17:37 -0500
      Re: rolling dice is not random? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-21 22:54 +0000
        Re: rolling dice is not random? Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-21 23:19 +0000
          Re: rolling dice is not random? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-21 23:34 +0000
          Re: rolling dice is not random? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 17:45 -0700
            Re: rolling dice is not random? Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-22 04:14 +0000
  Re: rolling dice is not random? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-10-22 09:45 +1100
    Re: rolling dice is not random? Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-10-21 20:12 -0400
      Re: rolling dice is not random? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-10-22 12:04 +1100
        Re: rolling dice is not random? Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-10-21 22:21 -0400
          Re: "Life" is virtual, not real. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-10-22 18:56 +1100
            Re: "Life" is virtual, not real. "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2015-10-22 03:09 -0700
            Re: "Life" is virtual, not real. Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-10-22 16:36 -0400
              Re: "Life" is virtual, not real. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 23:49 -0400
            Re: The Ensemble Interpretation. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-10-23 11:32 +1100
              Re: The Ensemble Interpretation. Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-10-22 20:40 -0400
                Re: The Ensemble Interpretation. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-10-23 11:50 +1100
            Re: The Ensemble Interpretation. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 17:33 -0700
          Re: "Life" is virtual, not real. The BORG <borg@future.com> - 2015-10-24 15:27 +0100
            Re: "Life" is virtual, not real. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-10-25 13:54 +1100
  Re: rolling dice is not random? bilgat@m.nu - 2015-10-21 18:46 -0500
    Re: rolling dice is not random? Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-10-21 20:13 -0400
  Re: rolling dice is not random? Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-10-21 22:48 -0400
    Re: rolling dice is not random? John Ritson <j.ritson@hotmail.co.uk> - 2015-10-22 09:57 +0100
      Re: rolling dice is not random? Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-10-22 16:32 -0400
        Re: rolling dice is not random? John Ritson <j.ritson@hotmail.co.uk> - 2015-10-22 22:53 +0100
          Re: rolling dice is not random? Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-10-22 19:36 -0400
            Re: rolling dice is not random? John Ritson <j.ritson@hotmail.co.uk> - 2015-10-23 10:26 +0100
              Re: rolling dice is not random? "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@sci.research.careers.i.have.shorter.stature.can.i.grow.taller> - 2015-10-24 09:56 +0000
          Re: rolling dice is not random? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 19:20 -0500
            Re: rolling dice is not random? R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2015-10-23 00:38 +0000
  Re: rolling dice is not random? Hans Wussel <hanswussel@openmailbox.org> - 2015-10-22 19:40 +0200
    Re: rolling dice is not random? Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-10-22 16:38 -0400
      Re: rolling dice is not random? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 14:21 -0700
      Re: rolling dice is not random? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 15:41 -0700
        Re: rolling dice is not random? "Raymond Luxury Yacht" <invalid@example.com> - 2015-10-22 19:37 -0700
        Re: rolling dice is not random? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 22:58 -0400
          Re: rolling dice is not random? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 09:51 -0700
  Re: rolling dice is not random? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-10-24 14:56 -0700
  Re: rolling dice is not random? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 13:13 -0700
    Re: rolling dice is not random? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-10-26 15:31 -0700
      pi for .. those guys noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 12:29 -0700
      Re: rolling dice is not random? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 12:45 -0700

csiph-web