Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #515431 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-20 19:57 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-08-28 12:27 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 137 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-20 19:57 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-20 17:09 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 20:59 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 05:10 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 08:24 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-21 15:23 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 20:53 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 16:12 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 16:13 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 08:09 +1000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:08 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 17:01 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 17:12 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 09:58 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 08:15 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 10:23 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-22 16:47 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:48 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:45 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:47 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 08:10 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 11:27 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-22 17:38 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 16:49 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-22 17:51 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 23:29 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:28 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:16 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 09:11 +0100
2 T-Annoy find your own evidence (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 05:51 -0500
Re: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 12:15 +0100
Re: 2 T-Annoy proves he is an asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:26 -0500
Re: 2 T-Annoy proves he is an asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:38 -0500
Re: 2 T-Annoy proves he is an asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:40 -0500
Re: 2 T-Annoy proves he is an asshole (was find your own evidence) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 17:45 +0100
T-Annoy proves he is still an asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 11:59 -0500
Re: T-Annoy proves he is still an asshole (was find your own evidence) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 18:19 +0100
T-Annoy proves he is still a big asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 12:45 -0500
Re: T-Annoy proves he is still a big asshole (was find your own evidence) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:10 +0000
Jim proves he can't see people impeach themselves "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:29 -0500
Re: Jim proves he can't see people impeach themselves jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:33 +0000
Re: Jim proves he can't see people impeach themselves "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:06 -0500
Re: Jim proves he can't see people impeach themselves je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:31 -0700
Re: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:47 -0500
Caught Kent in a BIG LIE (was: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit)) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:14 -0500
Re: Caught Kent in a BIG LIE (was: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit)) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 08:39 -0500
Re: Caught Kent in a BIG LIE (was: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 15:00 +0100
Re: Caught Kent in a BIG LIE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:00 +0000
Re: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 16:58 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:47 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:46 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:50 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 21:07 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-22 15:11 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 22:57 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-22 21:17 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-22 14:42 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-22 22:58 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 00:43 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 00:16 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:07 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 06:05 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 16:12 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 01:16 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:10 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-20 17:35 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 20:59 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 05:37 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 08:41 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 06:55 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-21 07:40 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 16:34 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 14:45 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 16:52 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-21 22:53 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-22 08:42 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 09:20 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 09:53 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:47 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:16 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:34 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:06 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 11:13 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-22 18:02 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 17:12 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-21 21:36 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:07 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:06 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:06 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 10:03 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 20:17 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:59 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 19:07 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-23 09:07 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 06:08 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 21:22 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-22 21:31 -0700
Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut: (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 10:43 -0500
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut: jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:01 +0000
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut: Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 19:38 +0200
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:08 -0500
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:35 +0000
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:05 -0500
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 13:06 -0700
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 21:47 +0200
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 12:59 -0700
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut: (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 11:38 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:19 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 16:10 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 10:43 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:49 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-23 04:44 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-22 21:55 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 06:27 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 07:24 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 09:56 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 12:08 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 10:46 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 12:59 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:14 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:02 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:02 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-27 19:21 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 15:39 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 14:05 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:10 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-27 18:17 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 06:31 +0200
Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-28 13:54 -0400
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 04:42 +0200
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 04:09 +0000
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 18:12 +0200
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 03:17 -0400
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 14:17 -0700
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 03:16 -0400
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 17:17 +0200
box cutters were not illegal, at that time noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 12:27 -0700
Page 4 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 Next page →
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 05:07 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <9eigta98jlaeqqr9frrehdgj345ml9m8n9@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #515657 |
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 17:01:40 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
>wrote in message news:9bf9474906ace8bf4e47580538b17f73@dizum.com...
>>
>> The FBI didn't say Barbara Olson didn't speak to Ted Olson, you
>> retarded fuckwit.
>
>You have never even tried to address why so little remained of the Twin
>Towers and by looking at their biggest lie it is easy to see that we were
>given lie after lie after lie including those clearly scripted phone calls.
>
No scripts were used. That people from each hijacked flight
stated the flight they were on was hijacked is not an indication of a
script being used. Not to the educated mind.
>And don't forget there is a much bigger truth and that is no 757 crashed at
>the Pentagon because it was all smoke from a smoke generator and the law of
>the Pentagon was spotless for a long time after the alleged 757 crashed too.
There were no smoke generator used.
What law (please cite the specific statutory and/or case law) are
you referring to?
>
>And 757s do not fold back their wings back so they can fly into a small hole
>like a bird going into a birdhouse. That story is so stupid and yet it
>still brainwashed quite a few TV Huggers like yourself.
Whereas no one has claimed the wings were folded back, except
uneducated Troofers, this deception has failed you.
Would you like to try another?
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 06:05 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <8984d1acd016d3d29cd61ce752502780@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #515603 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> joeturn2@yahoo.com, in <news:49453545-f8f7-4572-a9e1-6f59184546f9@googlegroups.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Friday, August 21, 2015 at 2:55:54 PM UTC-4, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >> >> Rocky, in <news:M46dnWXB9aGsu0rInZ2dnUU7-b-dnZ2d@giganews.com> >> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> >>> wrote in message > >>>> The disconnected call was the first call Barbara Olson attempted >>>> to make, via her cell phone, you fucking frothmonkey. Cell phones >>>> tend to get disconnected, as quickly as they hop from cell site >>>> to cell site as the plane moves. The remaining calls were from >>>> the AirPhone, via the operator, billed collect because Barbara >>>> Olson didn't have access to her purse and credit cards (which is >>>> why she called the operator, she didn't have a credit card to pay >>>> for the calls via the AirPhone)... she and everyone else had been >>>> herded to the back of the plane. >>> Hey<SMACKAKOOK!> >> Delusional psychotic fuckwits who blather stupidity will have >> their stupid slobbering gobs smacked shut each time they spew >> their stupidity, Delusional Psychotic Fuckwit. >> >> <http://www.911myths.com/index.php/American_Airlines_Flight_77_Calls> >> >> The FBI didn't say Barbara Olson didn't speak to Ted Olson, you >> retarded fuckwit. >> >> They said, and I quote: "57. The records available for the phone >> calls from American 77 do not allow for a determination of which >> of four 'connected calls to unknown numbers' represent the two >> between Barbara and Ted Olson, although the FBI and DOJ believe >> that all four represent communications between Barbara Olson and >> her husband's office (all family members of the Flight 77 >> passengers and crew were canvassed to see if they had received >> any phone calls from the hijacked flight, and only Renee May's >> parents and Ted Olson indicated that they had received such >> calls). The four calls were at 9:15:34 for 1 minute, 42 seconds; >> 9:20:15 for 4 minutes, 34 seconds; 9:25:48 for 2 minutes, 34 >> seconds; and 9:30:56 for 4 minutes, 20 seconds. FBI >> report,"American Airlines Airphone Usage," Sept. 20, 2001; FBI >> report of investigation, interview of Theodore Olson, Sept. 11, >> 2001; FBI report of investigation, interview of Helen Voss, Sept. >> 14, 2001; AAL response to the Commission's supplemental document >> request, Jan. 20, 2004. Footnote 57 to Chapter 1, 9/11 Commission >> Report" >> >> Notice the text blurb "the FBI and DOJ believe that all four >> represent communications between Barbara Olson and her husband's >> office", you fucking delusional little monkey. >> >> The FBI said exactly the *opposite* of what you're claiming. But >> of course, you've never actually *read* the FBI report, have you? >> You retard. >> >> The FBI said they weren't sure which call belonged to whom >> because the call was an operator-assisted collect call and thus >> didn't have proper tracking from the AirPhone system, given that >> AirPhones were serviced by AT&T Wireless' Aviation Division >> (ClairCom), and AT&T doesn't bill itself. Verizon serviced >> airplane phones for TWA (now a part of American), United, >> Continental, US Airways and most Delta flights, but AT&T had >> American flights. >> >> The phone records of Ted Olson's office prove you're not only >> wrong, you're not only delusional, but you're retarded, as well. >> The witnesses, including the AT&T operators (plural, there was >> more than one phone call from the plane's AirPhone from Barbara >> Olson to Ted Olson), Ted Olson's secretary and Ted Olson himself. >> >> Barbara Olson desperately asked Ted Olson what she should tell >> the pilot to do, not because she could call the pilot on his >> phone, but because the pilot was standing in the back of the >> plane with the passengers. The fucking plane had been hijacked, >> the terrorists were flying the plane. You idiot. >> >> But your broken brain seems to think that everything must be a >> conspiracy. Occam's Razor makes no sense to you... because you're >> retarded. >> >> Kook. LOL >>> Rocky >> Now, get to addressing the 15 ways your kook conspiracy theory >> violates the laws of physics: >> >> ====================================================== >> 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of >> collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep >> below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to >> drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact >> that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal >> *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 >> miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole >> *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why >> the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. >> >> 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the video *you* provided wasn't an >> EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd >> been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond >> time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) >> would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount >> of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That >> there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no >> nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have >> destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. >> >> 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that >> there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. >> If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have >> shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was most >> likely the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement >> weapon sights that was the source. You didn't specify what type >> of radiation was experienced, and I doubt you're smart or >> educated enough to even know what types of radiation there are. >> >> 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex >> or anywhere in NYC. They found tritium from the aircraft exit >> signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial >> sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for >> all other sources of radiation. >> >> 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be >> sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by >> people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you >> k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the >> order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame >> the bombs were buried. >> >> 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron >> source. It naturally decays over time, and its decay byproducts, >> the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, >> include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon >> poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger >> being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start >> any sort of nuclear chain reaction. >> >> 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* >> *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling >> vertical support column and *NO* EMP: >> ====================== >> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> >> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column >> buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No >> amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. >> ====================== >> >> 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going >> to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would >> be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the >> temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? >> >> 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through >> a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into >> surrounding rock. >> >> 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic >> taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of >> satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were >> detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill >> effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or >> aircraft. >> >> 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel sent down to >> service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source >> triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic >> basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire base at >> 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology >> to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 >> blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area >> the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced >> to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched >> for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to >> survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? >> >> 12) You admitted (ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com) >> that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers >> (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked >> off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your >> admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of >> the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" >> (your words)? >> >> 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic >> signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the >> WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? >> >> 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris >> kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep >> underground, Ko0K? >> >> 15) Explain how these 19 nukes could tunnel holes from their >> underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep, to directly >> under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid >> bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers >> (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations >> and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion >> started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on >> The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). >> ====================================================== >> >> There's now 15 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws >> of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, >> point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who >> can't grasp simple physics. >> >> Kook. LOL > THERE ARE NO NUCLEAR BOMBS > This was a fairy tail "tail" LOL > created to give purpose to get into the war.The Govenment "Govenment" LOL > stooge Instien "Instien" LOL > creatd "creatd" LOL > a farse "farse" LOL > to keep scientist Only one? LOL > from releasing free energy to the herd.His E=MCsquared balony caused scientist Only one? LOL > to steer away from energy and put forth the effort to build a bomb to stop all > wars.But after years of failure Roosevelt said if you cant "cant" LOL > make it fake it and Hiroshima/Nagasaki were used to fulfil Given that you're USian, "fulfil" LOL > the idiotsy. "idiotsy" says the idiocy spewing idiot. LOL! > They put on a show to make people then believe in witch craft.Niether "Niether" LOL > city was exposed to nuclear It's spelled "nucular", George. LOL > fall out,because it was an impossibility.No radiation burns at all. No, none at all... the word Hibakusha was made up out of thin air. LOL <http://www.hiroshima-remembered.com/photos/effects/images/WE10.jpg> <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e9/The_patient%27s_skin_is_burned_in_a_pattern_corresponding_to_the_dark_portions_of_a_kimono_-_NARA_-_519686.jpg> <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a9/Sumiteru_Taniguchi_back.jpg> <https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/ae/09/75/ae09750a9835b914af1453adef97d28e.jpg> <http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/6312/218/1600/radiation%20burns.jpg> <http://beatles.ncf.ca/young_boy_disfigured.jpg> Yeah, those hundreds of thousands of people, some of whom received such severe radiation burns that they died immediately... they were all "crisis actors" saying their scripted lines so George Bush could start a war in Japan... or some such libtard kook blather... right? LOL > Just to show you how stupid and gulible "gulible" LOL You forgot to misspell "stupid". Usually those who are claiming others are stupid misspell it "stupdid" or similar so others know how very intelligent they are. LOL > the herd is they still to this day believe,that the letter j > is over 500 years old. What's that got to do with nuclear weapons? Did Yeshua drop a nuke on somebody? LOL > Example jesus was spelled iesous 600 years ago Wrong. The original Hebrew was Yeshua, transliterated directly into English as "Joshua". "Iesous" is the Greek transliteration of the Hebrew name. The English spelling (due to Gian Giorgio Trissino distinguishing the 'i' and 'j' sounds in the Italian language in 1524, from which the English language inherited the 'j' sound) of the Greek transliteration of the Hebrew name is "Jesus". So our "Jesus" is the transliteration of a transliteration. Today, he'd be known as "Josh". LOL Greeks and Romans hated the Jews, and so tried to extinguish the name Yeshua from their records, replacing it with Iesous (or "Hail Zeus") as an attempt at co-opting Christianity and steering it back toward their ancient mythological gods. That we somehow picked up the name from the Greeks instead of a direct Hebrew transliteration is an accident of history, nothing more. Did you think human mouths incapable of producing the 'j' sound prior to 600 years ago, Ko0k? Or is the Occam's Razor explanation that written languages back then didn't distinguish between the 'i' and 'j' sound due to limitations in the written languages the more likely explanation? I mean, that *would* explain Gian Giorgio Trissino's treatise on the 'i' and 'j' sounds in the written Italian language, after all. And what's that got to do with nuclear weapons? LOL > and it means borned "borned" LOL > of Isis and Zues. "Zues" LOL Wrong. The Hebrew Yeshua means "The Lord is Salvation", Ko0k. Literally translated from Greek, Iesous means "Hail Zeus". Iesous has no meaning in Hebrew, as it's not a Hebrew word, Ko0k. LOL Are you saying you believe in the Greek mythological figures? Athena (goddess of wisdom) must have hated you, for some reason. LOL > GO FIGURE Wow... just. wow. A poorly spelled Gargle Gropes post from a tard currently welfare-mooching in a rented shitshack in Kissimmee, Florida somehow out-kooks the broken-brained Rocky. This country is doomed because of stupid fuckwits like you. Please die. Quickly. Preferably in a way in which disposal of your brainless carcass isn't required. The only good thing is that smart people can make a fortune off idiotic sheeple like you. You wonder why the gap between the rich and the poor is widening? It's because the gap between the intelligent and the dumbasses is widening. Say, I've got a book for sale that tells the absolute truth about what happened on 9/11. It includes everything down to the most minute detail, with photographs, secret emails, and a CD of supplementary evidence including audio... and *proves* that Bush did it. It's on sale in Borders book stores nationwide for the low, low price of $499.95. Get yours today! <snickers at retards searching for Borders bookstore locations> I've also got a video, for those mouth-breathers who never felt it necessary to learn how to read. At 6 hours, it only contains a subset of the evidence in the book, but also includes evidence not found in the book... if you want the full story, you'll have to buy the video and the book. You can purchase the video at Borders for the same $499.95 (if you hurry and buy it today, I'll cut that price by $100!), or you can rent it at Blockbuster Video for the incredibly low price of $125.95. They're both titled "Bush Done It! I Gots Prufe!". Go get yours today! <snickers at retards searching for Blockbuster locations> -- Rocky, your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the video *you* *provided* between the video disturbance due to satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (depending upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission... and since we're talking solid bedrock here, it'd be at the upper end of that scale). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain is now saying there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you know there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble or its vicinity. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" on the video *you* *provided* and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So you've proven by skirting the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality. And the harder you try, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-21 16:12 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <bt4ftapr2931ucaa853450elj83fvsk0qh@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #515535 |
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 08:24:25 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
>wrote in message >
>>
>> The disconnected call was the first call Barbara Olson attempted
>> to make, via her cell phone, you fucking frothmonkey. Cell phones
>> tend to get disconnected, as quickly as they hop from cell site
>> to cell site as the plane moves. The remaining calls were from
>> the AirPhone, via the operator, billed collect because Barbara
>> Olson didn't have access to her purse and credit cards (which is
>> why she called the operator, she didn't have a credit card to pay
>> for the calls via the AirPhone)... she and everyone else had been
>> herded to the back of the plane.
>
>Hey Friendly Neighborhood Nut don't bitch at me when it was the FBI's
>evidence that was used during the Zacarias Moussaoui trial that claimed
>Barbara never spoke to Ted. DUH.
>
*Sigh*
"The records available for the phone calls from American 77 do not
allow for a determination of which of four 'connected calls to unknown
numbers' represent the two between Barbara and Ted Olson, although the
FBI and DOJ believe that all four represent communications between
Barbara Olson and her husband's office."
Maybe you should read the FBI report. The FBI claims the polar
opposite of what you claim.
>And that same evidence also has a woman that called an answering machine
>whisper "It's a frame" at the end of her call. Now why would she do that?
>
>Don't believe me, well you can hear it yourself in this time indexed link.
><G>
> https://youtu.be/OmM4Tra-rg0?t=3m5s
>
>And the very first part of that phone call is at the first part of the above
>video.
The problem is that the audio has been enhanced to cause it to
falsely sound like she said, "It's a frame." But it's not very well
done. I wasn't reading the text within the video, so I didn't know
what I was "supposed" to hear.
I didn't hear, "It's a frame."
Can you link to the raw audio? If I were a betting man, I'd bet
you can't. Or won't.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 01:16 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <24idnSYWBbR3jkXInZ2dnUU7-QmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #515631 |
"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message news:bt4ftapr2931ucaa853450elj83fvsk0qh@4ax.com... > On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 08:24:25 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> >>"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> >>wrote in message > >>> >>> The disconnected call was the first call Barbara Olson attempted >>> to make, via her cell phone, you fucking frothmonkey. Cell phones >>> tend to get disconnected, as quickly as they hop from cell site >>> to cell site as the plane moves. The remaining calls were from >>> the AirPhone, via the operator, billed collect because Barbara >>> Olson didn't have access to her purse and credit cards (which is >>> why she called the operator, she didn't have a credit card to pay >>> for the calls via the AirPhone)... she and everyone else had been >>> herded to the back of the plane. >> >>Hey Friendly Neighborhood Nut don't bitch at me when it was the FBI's >>evidence that was used during the Zacarias Moussaoui trial that claimed >>Barbara never spoke to Ted. DUH. >> > > *Sigh* > > "The records available for the phone calls from American 77 do not > allow for a determination of which of four 'connected calls to unknown > numbers' represent the two between Barbara and Ted Olson, although the > FBI and DOJ believe that all four represent communications between > Barbara Olson and her husband's office." > > Maybe you should read the FBI report. The FBI claims the polar > opposite of what you claim. > >>And that same evidence also has a woman that called an answering machine >>whisper "It's a frame" at the end of her call. Now why would she do that? >> >>Don't believe me, well you can hear it yourself in this time indexed link. >><G> >> https://youtu.be/OmM4Tra-rg0?t=3m5s >> >>And the very first part of that phone call is at the first part of the >>above >>video. > > The problem is that the audio has been enhanced to cause it to > falsely sound like she said, "It's a frame." But it's not very well > done. I wasn't reading the text within the video, so I didn't know > what I was "supposed" to hear. > I didn't hear, "It's a frame." > Can you link to the raw audio? If I were a betting man, I'd bet > you can't. Or won't. The original audio was all over the Internet so google "it's a frame" duh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 05:10 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5jigtatkrabop9r28jdbks23pn2nuknl55@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #515723 |
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 01:16:36 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:bt4ftapr2931ucaa853450elj83fvsk0qh@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 08:24:25 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
>>>wrote in message >
>>>>
>>>> The disconnected call was the first call Barbara Olson attempted
>>>> to make, via her cell phone, you fucking frothmonkey. Cell phones
>>>> tend to get disconnected, as quickly as they hop from cell site
>>>> to cell site as the plane moves. The remaining calls were from
>>>> the AirPhone, via the operator, billed collect because Barbara
>>>> Olson didn't have access to her purse and credit cards (which is
>>>> why she called the operator, she didn't have a credit card to pay
>>>> for the calls via the AirPhone)... she and everyone else had been
>>>> herded to the back of the plane.
>>>
>>>Hey Friendly Neighborhood Nut don't bitch at me when it was the FBI's
>>>evidence that was used during the Zacarias Moussaoui trial that claimed
>>>Barbara never spoke to Ted. DUH.
>>>
>>
>> *Sigh*
>>
>> "The records available for the phone calls from American 77 do not
>> allow for a determination of which of four 'connected calls to unknown
>> numbers' represent the two between Barbara and Ted Olson, although the
>> FBI and DOJ believe that all four represent communications between
>> Barbara Olson and her husband's office."
>>
>> Maybe you should read the FBI report. The FBI claims the polar
>> opposite of what you claim.
>>
>>>And that same evidence also has a woman that called an answering machine
>>>whisper "It's a frame" at the end of her call. Now why would she do that?
>>>
>>>Don't believe me, well you can hear it yourself in this time indexed link.
>>><G>
>>> https://youtu.be/OmM4Tra-rg0?t=3m5s
>>>
>>>And the very first part of that phone call is at the first part of the
>>>above video.
>>
>> The problem is that the audio has been enhanced to cause it to
>> falsely sound like she said, "It's a frame." But it's not very well
>> done. I wasn't reading the text within the video, so I didn't know
>> what I was "supposed" to hear.
>> I didn't hear, "It's a frame."
>> Can you link to the raw audio? If I were a betting man, I'd bet
>> you can't. Or won't.
>
>The original audio was all over the Internet so google "it's a frame" duh
>
I wish I had bet. But at one to one odds that you wouldn't link
to the raw audio, it wasn't really a gamble. DUH!
How's that whole ignoring my posts thing working out for you? <G>
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-20 17:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ta6dnXyqSLfEy0vInZ2dnUU7-f2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #515431 |
"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message news:65002bc896720800888a3c3ecc6b84d3@dizum.com... > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Rocky, in <news:C7ydnYCKlO0ocEjInZ2dnUU7-R-dnZ2d@giganews.com> > did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > >> "Th<SMACKAKOOK!> > > You fucking moron, you keep going deeper and deeper down the > rabbit hole of insanity, listening to kooks who are just as or > more retarded than you are. > > <http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Barbara_Olson_calls> > > Barbara Olson called the operator and asked to be put through to > Ted Olson's office, the secretary answered and transferred the > call to him. The phone records on the website above proves it, > you fucking retard. And why is it that all the calls listed on your site have a duration of ZERO? <G> Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-20 20:59 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <6f1dta58et5rpgorhqjkrjp4p6mrk9ao9u@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #515468 |
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 17:35:35 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
>wrote in message news:65002bc896720800888a3c3ecc6b84d3@dizum.com...
>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Rocky, in <news:C7ydnYCKlO0ocEjInZ2dnUU7-R-dnZ2d@giganews.com>
>> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>>
>>> "Th<SMACKAKOOK!>
>>
>> You fucking moron, you keep going deeper and deeper down the
>> rabbit hole of insanity, listening to kooks who are just as or
>> more retarded than you are.
>>
>> <http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Barbara_Olson_calls>
>>
>> Barbara Olson called the operator and asked to be put through to
>> Ted Olson's office, the secretary answered and transferred the
>> call to him. The phone records on the website above proves it,
>> you fucking retard.
>
>And why is it that all the calls listed on your site have a duration of
>ZERO? <G>
>
Try READING what is written.
"Time is not tracked because OSPS bills."
It's so sad that your very real learning disability prevented you
from reading and understanding. I can only hope I was able to dumb it
down to a level you are able to understand.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-21 05:37 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <bc1a813a8befe2a041a11d945f997760@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #515468 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky, in <news:ta6dnXyqSLfEy0vInZ2dnUU7-f2dnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> > wrote in message news:65002bc896720800888a3c3ecc6b84d3@dizum.com... >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >> >> Rocky, in <news:C7ydnYCKlO0ocEjInZ2dnUU7-R-dnZ2d@giganews.com> >> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>> "Th<SMACKAKOOK!> >> You fucking moron, you keep going deeper and deeper down the >> rabbit hole of insanity, listening to kooks who are just as or >> more retarded than you are. >> >> <http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Barbara_Olson_calls> >> >> Barbara Olson called the operator and asked to be put through to >> Ted Olson's office, the secretary answered and transferred the >> call to him. The phone records on the website above proves it, >> you fucking retard. > A<SMACKAKOOK!> You will continue to be minimized, laughed at and dismissed as the broken-brained little kook that you are until you are able to explain how your kooky little scenario can violate several laws of physics. "Time is not tracked because OSPS bills" means Barbara Olson called the live operator, you brainless dimwit. The call was then handed off to the AT&T operator and the domain of the call changed to OSPS (Operator Services Position Station). The 102 second collect call, initially internally billed to the AT&T operator, wasn't time-tracked because AT&T doesn't fucking bill itself. Ted Olson's secretary said in her testimony that the longest call received had been a collect call, which would have been billed to Ted Olson's office. The reason she made a collect call is because her first call, via her cell phone, was almost immediately disconnected... as cell phone calls from planes usually are. So Barbara Olson tried the AirPhone on the plane, didn't have access to her purse because everyone had been herded to the back of the plane and thus couldn't make a credit card call, so she called the operator and asked to make a collect call to Ted Olson's office. The secretary answered, and patched Barbara Olson through to Ted Olson. They talked until they were disconnected (as also often happened with AirPhones), then she tried again. Kook. LOL > Rocky Now, get to addressing the 15 ways your kook conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics: ====================================================== 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the video *you* provided wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was most likely the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights that was the source. You didn't specify what type of radiation was experienced, and I doubt you're smart or educated enough to even know what types of radiation there are. 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or anywhere in NYC. They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical support column and *NO* EMP: ====================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================== 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding rock. 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 satellite uplink disruptions in the video *you* provided) were detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel sent down to service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire base at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? 12) You admitted (ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep underground, Ko0K? 15) Explain how these 19 nukes could tunnel holes from their underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep, to directly under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). ====================================================== There's now 15 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp simple physics. Kook. LOL -- Rocky, your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the video *you* *provided* between the video disturbance due to satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (depending upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission... and since we're talking solid bedrock here, it'd be at the upper end of that scale). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain is now saying there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you know there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble or its vicinity. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" on the video *you* *provided* and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So you've proven by skirting the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality. And the harder you try, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-21 08:41 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <FcKdnfh25LWst0rInZ2dnUU7-XudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #515505 |
"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message > > You will continue to be minimized, laughed at and dismissed as > the broken-brained little kook that you are until you are able to > explain how your kooky little scenario can violate several laws > of physics. You mean your laws of Physics and not Newton's laws. I've seen your math and how you get miles deep when it should be meters deep is beyond me. Plus you can try your hardest to keep your lies about the Ted/Barbara bullshit but the fact remains most all those calls were scripted as proven by the similarity between flights, the terms that would not be used in real life and the fact the scripts had a stewardess making calls when that would be the last thing she would have done because of her training. In other words you might want to check out what Rebekah Roth stated about the obvious scripting of all the calls made on 9/11.01. See: "Airline whistleblower solves 9/11" http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/01/31/airline911/ So, I'll say it again in case you missed it. When you look at all the phone calls together the similarities between flights prove something was screwy and then the phrases people used also proved things where funny and then when they had a Stewardess making calls that wasn't even real because they are trained not to bring attention to themselves during a hijacking. So basically the calls made from the four alleged flights were scripted or phony phone calls. Plus if someone really sprayed pepper spray on a flight it would have stunk up everywhere on that flight and not just part of it so that wasn't true to life either. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-21 06:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8n3vtn.5mn.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #515538 |
Rocky wrote: > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message > >> You will continue to be minimized, laughed at and dismissed as >> the broken-brained little kook that you are until you are able to >> explain how your kooky little scenario can violate several laws >> of physics. > > You mean your laws of Physics and not Newton's laws. I've seen your > math and how you get miles deep when it should be meters deep is > beyond me. > > Plus you can try your hardest to keep your lies about the Ted/Barbara > bullshit but the fact remains most all those calls were scripted as > proven by the similarity between flights, the terms that would not be > used in real life and the fact the scripts had a stewardess making > calls when that would be the last thing she would have done because > of her training. > > In other words you might want to check out what Rebekah Roth stated > about the obvious scripting of all the calls made on 9/11.01. See: > "Airline whistleblower solves 9/11" > http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/01/31/airline911/ > > So, I'll say it again in case you missed it. When you look at all > the phone calls together the similarities between flights prove > something was screwy and then the phrases people used also proved > things where funny and then when they had a Stewardess making calls > that wasn't even real because they are trained not to bring attention > to themselves during a hijacking. So basically the calls made from > the four alleged flights were scripted or phony phone calls. > > Plus if someone really sprayed pepper spray on a flight it would have > stunk up everywhere on that flight and not just part of it so that > wasn't true to life either. > > Rocky there never was any planes
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-21 07:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3040d81cc98c6a3398ac46@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #515540 |
In article <8n3vtn.5mn.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... > > Rocky wrote: > > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" > > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message > > >> You will continue to be minimized, laughed at and dismissed as > >> the broken-brained little kook that you are until you are able to > >> explain how your kooky little scenario can violate several laws > >> of physics. > > > > You mean your laws of Physics and not Newton's laws. I've seen your > > math and how you get miles deep when it should be meters deep is > > beyond me. > > > > Plus you can try your hardest to keep your lies about the Ted/Barbara > > bullshit but the fact remains most all those calls were scripted as > > proven by the similarity between flights, the terms that would not be > > used in real life and the fact the scripts had a stewardess making > > calls when that would be the last thing she would have done because > > of her training. > > > > In other words you might want to check out what Rebekah Roth stated > > about the obvious scripting of all the calls made on 9/11.01. See: > > "Airline whistleblower solves 9/11" > > http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/01/31/airline911/ > > > > So, I'll say it again in case you missed it. When you look at all > > the phone calls together the similarities between flights prove > > something was screwy and then the phrases people used also proved > > things where funny and then when they had a Stewardess making calls > > that wasn't even real because they are trained not to bring attention > > to themselves during a hijacking. So basically the calls made from > > the four alleged flights were scripted or phony phone calls. > > > > Plus if someone really sprayed pepper spray on a flight it would have > > stunk up everywhere on that flight and not just part of it so that > > wasn't true to life either. > > > > Rocky > > there never was any planes There isn't even a Rocky on my server. -- Checkmate Official AUK Award Giver-Outer Copyright © 2015 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-21 16:34 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nf6dndFvOZERBErInZ2dnUU7-dGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #515545 |
"Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message news:MPG.3040d81cc98c6a3398ac46@news.altopia.com... > In article <8n3vtn.5mn.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... > > >> >> Rocky wrote: >> > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" >> > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message > >> >> You will continue to be minimized, laughed at and dismissed as >> >> the broken-brained little kook that you are until you are able to >> >> explain how your kooky little scenario can violate several laws >> >> of physics. >> > >> > You mean your laws of Physics and not Newton's laws. I've seen your >> > math and how you get miles deep when it should be meters deep is >> > beyond me. >> > >> > Plus you can try your hardest to keep your lies about the Ted/Barbara >> > bullshit but the fact remains most all those calls were scripted as >> > proven by the similarity between flights, the terms that would not be >> > used in real life and the fact the scripts had a stewardess making >> > calls when that would be the last thing she would have done because >> > of her training. >> > >> > In other words you might want to check out what Rebekah Roth stated >> > about the obvious scripting of all the calls made on 9/11.01. See: >> > "Airline whistleblower solves 9/11" >> > http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/01/31/airline911/ >> > >> > So, I'll say it again in case you missed it. When you look at all >> > the phone calls together the similarities between flights prove >> > something was screwy and then the phrases people used also proved >> > things where funny and then when they had a Stewardess making calls >> > that wasn't even real because they are trained not to bring attention >> > to themselves during a hijacking. So basically the calls made from >> > the four alleged flights were scripted or phony phone calls. >> > >> > Plus if someone really sprayed pepper spray on a flight it would have >> > stunk up everywhere on that flight and not just part of it so that >> > wasn't true to life either. >> > >> > Rocky >> >> there never was any planes > > There isn't even a Rocky on my server. And do you really think anybody cares?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-21 14:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8n4rf2.4mi.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #515648 |
Rocky wrote: > "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message > news:MPG.3040d81cc98c6a3398ac46@news.altopia.com... >> In article <8n3vtn.5mn.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... >> >> >>> >>> Rocky wrote: >>>> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" >>>> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message > >>>>> You will continue to be minimized, laughed at and dismissed as >>>>> the broken-brained little kook that you are until you are able to >>>>> explain how your kooky little scenario can violate several laws >>>>> of physics. >>>> >>>> You mean your laws of Physics and not Newton's laws. I've seen >>>> your math and how you get miles deep when it should be meters deep >>>> is beyond me. >>>> >>>> Plus you can try your hardest to keep your lies about the >>>> Ted/Barbara bullshit but the fact remains most all those calls >>>> were scripted as proven by the similarity between flights, the >>>> terms that would not be used in real life and the fact the scripts >>>> had a stewardess making calls when that would be the last thing >>>> she would have done because of her training. >>>> >>>> In other words you might want to check out what Rebekah Roth stated >>>> about the obvious scripting of all the calls made on 9/11.01. See: >>>> "Airline whistleblower solves 9/11" >>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/01/31/airline911/ >>>> >>>> So, I'll say it again in case you missed it. When you look at all >>>> the phone calls together the similarities between flights prove >>>> something was screwy and then the phrases people used also proved >>>> things where funny and then when they had a Stewardess making calls >>>> that wasn't even real because they are trained not to bring >>>> attention to themselves during a hijacking. So basically the >>>> calls made from the four alleged flights were scripted or phony >>>> phone calls. >>>> >>>> Plus if someone really sprayed pepper spray on a flight it would >>>> have stunk up everywhere on that flight and not just part of it so >>>> that wasn't true to life either. >>>> >>>> Rocky >>> >>> there never was any planes >> >> There isn't even a Rocky on my server. > > And do you really think anybody cares? you admit you don't care about you
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-21 16:52 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <itWdnei4SpdNAErInZ2dnUU7-amdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #515650 |
"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message news:8n4rf2.4mi.17.1@news.alt.net... > Rocky wrote: >> "Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message >> news:MPG.3040d81cc98c6a3398ac46@news.altopia.com... >>> In article <8n3vtn.5mn.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Rocky wrote: >>>>> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" >>>>> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message > >>>>>> You will continue to be minimized, laughed at and dismissed as >>>>>> the broken-brained little kook that you are until you are able to >>>>>> explain how your kooky little scenario can violate several laws >>>>>> of physics. >>>>> >>>>> You mean your laws of Physics and not Newton's laws. I've seen >>>>> your math and how you get miles deep when it should be meters deep >>>>> is beyond me. >>>>> >>>>> Plus you can try your hardest to keep your lies about the >>>>> Ted/Barbara bullshit but the fact remains most all those calls >>>>> were scripted as proven by the similarity between flights, the >>>>> terms that would not be used in real life and the fact the scripts >>>>> had a stewardess making calls when that would be the last thing >>>>> she would have done because of her training. >>>>> >>>>> In other words you might want to check out what Rebekah Roth stated >>>>> about the obvious scripting of all the calls made on 9/11.01. See: >>>>> "Airline whistleblower solves 9/11" >>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/01/31/airline911/ >>>>> >>>>> So, I'll say it again in case you missed it. When you look at all >>>>> the phone calls together the similarities between flights prove >>>>> something was screwy and then the phrases people used also proved >>>>> things where funny and then when they had a Stewardess making calls >>>>> that wasn't even real because they are trained not to bring >>>>> attention to themselves during a hijacking. So basically the >>>>> calls made from the four alleged flights were scripted or phony >>>>> phone calls. Plus if someone really sprayed pepper spray on a flight >>>>> it would >>>>> have stunk up everywhere on that flight and not just part of it so >>>>> that wasn't true to life either. >>>>> >>>>> Rocky >>>> >>>> there never was any planes >>> >>> There isn't even a Rocky on my server. >> >> And do you really think anybody cares? > > you admit you don't care about you If he wants to run from the facts behind the Great 9/11 Hoax let 'em. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-21 22:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <rnmkac-7ci.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #515655 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > If he wants to run from the facts behind the Great 9/11 Hoax let 'em. The facts are some airliners were hijacked. Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed almost 2 hours later. One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. Everything else is kook babble. That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble. That there is missing rubble is kook babble. That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble. That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble. That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear devices is kook babble. That there was an EMP is kook babble. That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not seen by every seismograph in the world is kook babble. That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything to do with what happened is kook babble. That the scene was radioactive is kook babble. That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima or Nagasaki is kook babble. That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear is kook babble. That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance and still be expected to work is kook babble. That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear bombs is kook babble. That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the airplanes hit the towers is kook babble. That all the video was CGI is kook babble. That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble. That the exterior walls were anything other than supports for the windows is kook babble. That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble. That a shotgun works anything like an underground nuclear explosion is kook babble. There is nothing in an airplane that transmits the flight number to ATC and saying the transponder does that is kook babble. Saying a missile of any kind hit the Pentagon is kook babble. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature that can be detected anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the collapse of the two towers was detected. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. Saying people worship their television and capitalizing "television" is kook babble. Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 08:42 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mr9qku$6md$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #515680 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> If he wants to run from the facts behind the Great 9/11 Hoax let 'em. > > The facts are some airliners were hijacked. > > Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires > which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed > almost 2 hours later. > > One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the > western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. > > Everything else is kook babble. > > That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble. > > That there is missing rubble is kook babble. > > That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble. > > That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble. > > That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear > devices is kook babble. > > That there was an EMP is kook babble. > > That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not > seen by every seismograph in the world is kook babble. > > That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything > to do with what happened is kook babble. > > That the scene was radioactive is kook babble. > > That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima > or Nagasaki is kook babble. > > That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear > is kook babble. > > That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance > and still be expected to work is kook babble. > > That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear > bombs is kook babble. > > That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the > airplanes hit the towers is kook babble. > > That all the video was CGI is kook babble. > > That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook > babble. > > That the exterior walls were anything other than supports for the > windows is kook babble. > > That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble. > > That a shotgun works anything like an underground nuclear explosion > is kook babble. > > There is nothing in an airplane that transmits the flight number to > ATC and saying the transponder does that is kook babble. > > Saying a missile of any kind hit the Pentagon is kook babble. > > When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature > that can be detected anywhere on the planet. > > There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the > collapse of the two towers was detected. > > This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. > > Saying people worship their television and capitalizing "television" is > kook babble. > > Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble. Eventually you will realize that no matter how many times you repeat yourself, it really won't make it true. Although you may indeed convince yourself that it is. Now watch this video,....while there is still a glimmer of hope for you to have an open mind. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKtU01qcZBM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 09:20 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <m81htal3cod0b73jpev72t0mmtufp1408c@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #515762 |
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 08:42:38 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> If he wants to run from the facts behind the Great 9/11 Hoax let 'em.
>>
>> The facts are some airliners were hijacked.
>>
>> Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires
>> which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed
>> almost 2 hours later.
>>
>> One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the
>> western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania.
>>
>> Everything else is kook babble.
>>
>> That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble.
>>
>> That there is missing rubble is kook babble.
>>
>> That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble.
>>
>> That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble.
>>
>> That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear
>> devices is kook babble.
>>
>> That there was an EMP is kook babble.
>>
>> That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not
>> seen by every seismograph in the world is kook babble.
>>
>> That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything
>> to do with what happened is kook babble.
>>
>> That the scene was radioactive is kook babble.
>>
>> That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima
>> or Nagasaki is kook babble.
>>
>> That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear
>> is kook babble.
>>
>> That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance
>> and still be expected to work is kook babble.
>>
>> That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear
>> bombs is kook babble.
>>
>> That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the
>> airplanes hit the towers is kook babble.
>>
>> That all the video was CGI is kook babble.
>>
>> That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook
>> babble.
>>
>> That the exterior walls were anything other than supports for the
>> windows is kook babble.
>>
>> That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble.
>>
>> That a shotgun works anything like an underground nuclear explosion
>> is kook babble.
>>
>> There is nothing in an airplane that transmits the flight number to
>> ATC and saying the transponder does that is kook babble.
>>
>> Saying a missile of any kind hit the Pentagon is kook babble.
>>
>> When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature
>> that can be detected anywhere on the planet.
>>
>> There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the
>> collapse of the two towers was detected.
>>
>> This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.
>>
>> Saying people worship their television and capitalizing "television" is
>> kook babble.
>>
>> Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble.
>
>
>
>
>
>Eventually you will realize that no matter how many times you repeat
>yourself, it really won't make it true.
>Although you may indeed convince yourself that it is.
>
>Now watch this video,....while there is still a glimmer of hope for you to
>have an open mind.
>
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKtU01qcZBM
>
That's actually funny. A follower of the Troofer religion
mentioning an open mind.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 09:53 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <l-Sdnc5aoYUdEUXInZ2dnUU7-cGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #515762 |
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message news:mr9qku$6md$1@dont-email.me... > > > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> If he wants to run from the facts behind the Great 9/11 Hoax let 'em. >> >> The facts are some airliners were hijacked. >> >> Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires >> which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed >> almost 2 hours later. >> >> One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the >> western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. >> >> Everything else is kook babble. >> >> That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble. >> >> That there is missing rubble is kook babble. >> >> That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble. >> >> That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble. >> >> That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear >> devices is kook babble. >> >> That there was an EMP is kook babble. >> >> That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not >> seen by every seismograph in the world is kook babble. >> >> That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything >> to do with what happened is kook babble. >> >> That the scene was radioactive is kook babble. >> >> That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima >> or Nagasaki is kook babble. >> >> That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear >> is kook babble. >> >> That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance >> and still be expected to work is kook babble. >> >> That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear >> bombs is kook babble. >> >> That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the >> airplanes hit the towers is kook babble. >> >> That all the video was CGI is kook babble. >> >> That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook >> babble. >> >> That the exterior walls were anything other than supports for the >> windows is kook babble. >> >> That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble. >> >> That a shotgun works anything like an underground nuclear explosion >> is kook babble. >> >> There is nothing in an airplane that transmits the flight number to >> ATC and saying the transponder does that is kook babble. >> >> Saying a missile of any kind hit the Pentagon is kook babble. >> >> When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature >> that can be detected anywhere on the planet. >> >> There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the >> collapse of the two towers was detected. >> >> This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. >> >> Saying people worship their television and capitalizing "television" is >> kook babble. >> >> Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble. > > > > > > Eventually you will realize that no matter how many times you repeat > yourself, it really won't make it true. > Although you may indeed convince yourself that it is. > > Now watch this video,....while there is still a glimmer of hope for you to > have an open mind. > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKtU01qcZBM Nice video but the fact WTC7 also took Fiterman Hall with it, which was the building north of WTC7 proves WTC7 was another building destroyed by an underground nuke and not debris from the Twin Towers. It is what people do not say that leads everybody down the wrong direction. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 12:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <hddhta195sqvfjb8i5st6ho9upij468bd0@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #515775 |
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 09:53:16 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
[...]
>> Eventually you will realize that no matter how many times you repeat
>> yourself, it really won't make it true.
>> Although you may indeed convince yourself that it is.
>>
>> Now watch this video,....while there is still a glimmer of hope for you to
>> have an open mind.
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKtU01qcZBM
>
>Nice video but the fact WTC7 also took Fiterman Hall with it, which was the
>building north of WTC7 proves WTC7 was another building destroyed by an
>underground nuke and not debris from the Twin Towers.
>
It proves the exact opposite of your claim.
>It is what people do not say that leads everybody down the wrong direction.
No educated person claims nukes were involved with 9/11.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 13:16 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <dPqdnY_26bkxkEfInZ2dnUU7-KednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #515805 |
"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message news:hddhta195sqvfjb8i5st6ho9upij468bd0@4ax.com... > On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 09:53:16 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > [...] > >>> Eventually you will realize that no matter how many times you repeat >>> yourself, it really won't make it true. >>> Although you may indeed convince yourself that it is. >>> >>> Now watch this video,....while there is still a glimmer of hope for you >>> to >>> have an open mind. >>> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKtU01qcZBM >> >>Nice video but the fact WTC7 also took Fiterman Hall with it, which was >>the >>building north of WTC7 proves WTC7 was another building destroyed by an >>underground nuke and not debris from the Twin Towers. >> > > It proves the exact opposite of your claim. You always say shit with nothing at all to support it. BTW that is SOP for the Television Set Huggers as yourself. BTW NIST uses the same SOP as you as proven by the videos titled "Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence." <G> >>It is what people do not say that leads everybody down the wrong >>direction. > > No educated person claims nukes were involved with 9/11. You mean nobody educated by Prime Time News like yourself you clown. Besides you just haven't looked around because the number of people who don't believe the official bullshit about 9/11 keeps going up. <G> Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web