Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #515431 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-20 19:57 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-08-28 12:27 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 137 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-20 19:57 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-20 17:09 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 20:59 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 05:10 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 08:24 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-21 15:23 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 20:53 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 16:12 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 16:13 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 08:09 +1000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:08 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 17:01 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 17:12 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 09:58 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 08:15 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 10:23 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-22 16:47 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:48 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:45 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:47 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 08:10 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 11:27 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-22 17:38 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 16:49 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-22 17:51 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 23:29 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:28 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:16 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 09:11 +0100
2 T-Annoy find your own evidence (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 05:51 -0500
Re: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 12:15 +0100
Re: 2 T-Annoy proves he is an asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:26 -0500
Re: 2 T-Annoy proves he is an asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:38 -0500
Re: 2 T-Annoy proves he is an asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:40 -0500
Re: 2 T-Annoy proves he is an asshole (was find your own evidence) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 17:45 +0100
T-Annoy proves he is still an asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 11:59 -0500
Re: T-Annoy proves he is still an asshole (was find your own evidence) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 18:19 +0100
T-Annoy proves he is still a big asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 12:45 -0500
Re: T-Annoy proves he is still a big asshole (was find your own evidence) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:10 +0000
Jim proves he can't see people impeach themselves "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:29 -0500
Re: Jim proves he can't see people impeach themselves jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:33 +0000
Re: Jim proves he can't see people impeach themselves "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:06 -0500
Re: Jim proves he can't see people impeach themselves je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:31 -0700
Re: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:47 -0500
Caught Kent in a BIG LIE (was: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit)) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:14 -0500
Re: Caught Kent in a BIG LIE (was: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit)) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 08:39 -0500
Re: Caught Kent in a BIG LIE (was: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 15:00 +0100
Re: Caught Kent in a BIG LIE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:00 +0000
Re: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 16:58 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:47 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:46 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:50 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 21:07 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-22 15:11 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 22:57 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-22 21:17 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-22 14:42 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-22 22:58 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 00:43 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 00:16 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:07 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 06:05 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 16:12 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 01:16 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:10 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-20 17:35 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 20:59 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 05:37 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 08:41 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 06:55 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-21 07:40 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 16:34 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 14:45 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 16:52 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-21 22:53 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-22 08:42 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 09:20 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 09:53 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:47 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:16 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:34 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:06 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 11:13 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-22 18:02 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 17:12 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-21 21:36 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:07 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:06 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:06 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 10:03 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 20:17 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:59 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 19:07 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-23 09:07 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 06:08 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 21:22 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-22 21:31 -0700
Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut: (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 10:43 -0500
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut: jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:01 +0000
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut: Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 19:38 +0200
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:08 -0500
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:35 +0000
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:05 -0500
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 13:06 -0700
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 21:47 +0200
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 12:59 -0700
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut: (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 11:38 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:19 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 16:10 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 10:43 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:49 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-23 04:44 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-22 21:55 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 06:27 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 07:24 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 09:56 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 12:08 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 10:46 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 12:59 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:14 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:02 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:02 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-27 19:21 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 15:39 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 14:05 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:10 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-27 18:17 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 06:31 +0200
Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-28 13:54 -0400
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 04:42 +0200
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 04:09 +0000
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 18:12 +0200
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 03:17 -0400
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 14:17 -0700
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 03:16 -0400
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 17:17 +0200
box cutters were not illegal, at that time noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 12:27 -0700
Page 2 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 Next page →
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 08:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1a953d2d092aff74829f44723af31114@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #515657 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky, in <news:ffCdnclecKh1AkrInZ2dnUU7-dmdnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> > wrote in message news:9bf9474906ace8bf4e47580538b17f73@dizum.com... >> The FBI didn't say Barbara Olson didn't speak to Ted Olson, you >> retarded fuckwit. > Yo<SMACKAKOOK!> Plane parts from a 757 were found inside and outside the Pentagon, including the black box for the flight in question. That your broken brain can't accept reality is nothing more than proof of how broken it is. Get back on your meds, Idiot. LOL > Rocky Now, get to addressing the 16 ways your kook conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics: ====================================================== 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the video *you* provided wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was most likely the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights that was the source. You didn't specify what type of radiation was experienced, and I doubt you're smart or educated enough to even know what types of radiation there are. 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or anywhere in NYC. They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical support column and *NO* EMP: ====================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================== 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding rock. 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. 11) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes, as opposed to your previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3 nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is? While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps at the twin towers (because the space was primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes, and how 23 nukes were obtained and put in place without drawing any attention whatsoever. 12) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel sent down to service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire base at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? 13) You admitted (ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? 14) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? 15) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep underground, Ko0K? 16) Explain how these 19 nukes could tunnel holes from their underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep, to directly under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). ====================================================== There are now 16 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp simple physics. Kook. LOL -- Rocky, your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the video *you* *provided* between the video disturbance due to satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (depending upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission... and since we're talking solid bedrock here, it'd be at the upper end of that scale). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain is now saying there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you know there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble or its vicinity. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) Now your broken brain is telling you, for some as-yet unfathomable reason, that there were 34 nukes, rather than your previously claimed 19 (or your previously, previously claimed 3), without explaining exactly how 34 nukes were attained and put into place without drawing any attention whatsoever (especially given that the WTC towers had regular rad sweeps because they were primarily rented by government agencies). Gullible idiots believe everything they read because their broken brains can't discern between reality and fantasy. LOL G) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those nuclear bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" on the video *you* *provided* and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So you've proven by skirting the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality. And the harder you try, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 11:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ZbCdnczsqY8TP0XInZ2dnUU7-IednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #515722 |
"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message > >>> The FBI didn't say Barbara Olson didn't speak to Ted Olson, you >>> retarded fuckwit. They said the call was not completed. To me that means the call was not completed. DUH. > Plane parts from a 757 were found inside True but those parts had the remains of vegetation that is only found in Brazil so they obviously moved parts from a previous crash to the Pentagon. > and outside the > Pentagon But that single engine was carried out from inside the Pentagon and why was only one engine found when they should have found two engines and engines don't burn up very easily. > including the black box for the flight in question. ROTFLMAO because the flight data shows it was too high to hit the Pentaton. <G> > That your broken brain can't accept reality is nothing more than > proof of how broken it is. ROTFLMAO because love is blind and you are too in love with your Television Set to see that 9/11 was one great big hoax. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 17:38 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1m9kgy8.105w4ua9olxd4N%snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk> |
| In reply to | #515789 |
Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: [...] > one great big hoax. > > Rocky > Indeed. Aren't you embarrassed to have fallen for it, Rocky? -- ^Ï^. Sn!pe <snipe@notforspam.fsnet.co.uk> My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 16:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <qplmac-uto.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #515789 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: <snip kook babble> > True but those parts had the remains of vegetation that is only found in > Brazil so they obviously moved parts from a previous crash to the Pentagon. And none of the thousands of people in the area noticed trucks bringing in airplane parts and scattering them around? You really are quite insane. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 17:51 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mraqql$sbi$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #515797 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <snip kook babble> > >> True but those parts had the remains of vegetation that is only found >> in Brazil so they obviously moved parts from a previous crash to the >> Pentagon. > > And none of the thousands of people in the area noticed trucks bringing > in airplane parts and scattering them around? > > You really are quite insane. > > <snip remaining kook babble> More importantly,...no one of those thousands of people you mention, saw anyone actually picking up plane parts, or videotaped this happening We are only TOLD they were found. And shown pictures that could have been taken anywhere After we were told by an on the scene reporter that morning, that there was only a hole in the wall with no sign of a plane. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ Do you really think a reporter wouldn't know the difference ? But hey,....if your 9/11 report booklet of fairytales told you that they found the recipe for making gold from lead, and made a working cold-fusion reactor,....you would be telling us that was true as well.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 23:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <f8dnac-j8r.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #515890 |
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> <snip kook babble> >> >>> True but those parts had the remains of vegetation that is only found >>> in Brazil so they obviously moved parts from a previous crash to the >>> Pentagon. >> >> And none of the thousands of people in the area noticed trucks bringing >> in airplane parts and scattering them around? >> >> You really are quite insane. >> >> <snip remaining kook babble> > > > > > > More importantly,...no one of those thousands of people you mention, saw > anyone actually picking up plane parts, or videotaped this happening > We are only TOLD they were found. And shown pictures that could have been > taken anywhere And we have yet another raving kook. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 20:28 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <BoadnW1xU-BsvETInZ2dnUU7-K2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #515904 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:f8dnac-j8r.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >> >> >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>> <snip kook babble> >>> >>>> True but those parts had the remains of vegetation that is only found >>>> in Brazil so they obviously moved parts from a previous crash to the >>>> Pentagon. >>> >>> And none of the thousands of people in the area noticed trucks bringing >>> in airplane parts and scattering them around? >>> >>> You really are quite insane. >>> >>> <snip remaining kook babble> >> >> >> >> >> >> More importantly,...no one of those thousands of people you mention, saw >> anyone actually picking up plane parts, or videotaped this happening >> We are only TOLD they were found. And shown pictures that could have been >> taken anywhere > > And we have yet another raving kook. > > <snip remaining kook babble> > > > -- > Jim Pennino Funny that the only kook I see is Jim because Jet Fuel does not leave the following tell tale signs behind: http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 05:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pi1oac-n4t.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #515929 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Funny that the only kook I see is Jim because Jet Fuel does not leave the > following tell tale signs behind: What tell tale signs would that be, kook? The facts are some airliners were hijacked. Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed almost 2 hours later. One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. Everything else is kook babble. That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble. That there is missing rubble is kook babble. That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble. That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble. That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear devices is kook babble. That there was an EMP is kook babble. That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not seen by every seismograph in the world is kook babble. That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything to do with what happened is kook babble. That the scene was radioactive is kook babble. That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima or Nagasaki is kook babble. That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear is kook babble. That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance and still be expected to work is kook babble. That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear bombs is kook babble. That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the airplanes hit the towers is kook babble. That all the video was CGI is kook babble. That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble. That the exterior walls were anything other than supports for the windows is kook babble. That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble. That a shotgun works anything like an underground nuclear explosion is kook babble. There is nothing in an airplane that transmits the flight number to ATC and saying the transponder does that is kook babble. Saying a missile of any kind hit the Pentagon is kook babble. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature that can be detected anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the collapse of the two towers as well as the plane crash at the Pentagon and the crash in Pennsyvania were detected. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. Saying people worship their television and capitalizing "television" is kook babble. Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 09:11 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mrbv4u$5df$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #515929 |
On 23/08/2015 02:28, Rocky wrote: > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:f8dnac-j8r.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> <snip kook babble> >>>> >>>>> True but those parts had the remains of vegetation that is only found >>>>> in Brazil so they obviously moved parts from a previous crash to the >>>>> Pentagon. >>>> >>>> And none of the thousands of people in the area noticed trucks bringing >>>> in airplane parts and scattering them around? >>>> >>>> You really are quite insane. >>>> >>>> <snip remaining kook babble> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> More importantly,...no one of those thousands of people you mention, saw >>> anyone actually picking up plane parts, or videotaped this happening >>> We are only TOLD they were found. And shown pictures that could have been >>> taken anywhere >> >> And we have yet another raving kook. >> >> <snip remaining kook babble> >> >> >> -- >> Jim Pennino > > Funny that the only kook I see is Jim because Jet Fuel does not leave the > following tell tale signs behind: > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > Rocky > > To say that means that you must be comparing it to a known event, what event would that be? --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 05:51 -0500 |
| Subject | 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit) |
| Message-ID | <Uo-dnT7ux-VuOETInZ2dnUU7-WudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516012 |
"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:mrbv4u$5df$1@dont-email.me... > On 23/08/2015 02:28, Rocky wrote: >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> news:f8dnac-j8r.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> <snip kook babble> >>>>> >>>>>> True but those parts had the remains of vegetation that is only found >>>>>> in Brazil so they obviously moved parts from a previous crash to the >>>>>> Pentagon. >>>>> >>>>> And none of the thousands of people in the area noticed trucks >>>>> bringing >>>>> in airplane parts and scattering them around? >>>>> >>>>> You really are quite insane. >>>>> >>>>> <snip remaining kook babble> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> More importantly,...no one of those thousands of people you mention, >>>> saw >>>> anyone actually picking up plane parts, or videotaped this happening >>>> We are only TOLD they were found. And shown pictures that could have >>>> been >>>> taken anywhere >>> >>> And we have yet another raving kook. >>> >>> <snip remaining kook babble> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jim Pennino >> >> Funny that the only kook I see is Jim because Jet Fuel does not leave the >> following tell tale signs behind: >> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >> >> Rocky >> >> > > > To say that means that you must be comparing it to a known event, what > event would that be? T-annoy, you can look up what Controlled Demoltions leaves behind yourself you clown. And since a collapse and a controlled demoltion should leave about the same size rubble pile the photo above rules out both the official bullshit and a controlled demoltion. And don't forget it took me 9 years before I could claim a nuke did the Twin Towers in but what finally convinced me is a photo like the above and a photo of Fiterman Hall proving it was destroyed by the deep underground nuke used on WTC7. Now it is up to you to try and prove me wrong about what a controlled demoltion leaves behind because I can't do everything for you and I should not have to. DUH. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 12:15 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence |
| Message-ID | <mrc9tl$ajv$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #516032 |
On 23/08/2015 11:51, Rocky wrote: > "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message > news:mrbv4u$5df$1@dont-email.me... >> On 23/08/2015 02:28, Rocky wrote: >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>> news:f8dnac-j8r.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> <snip kook babble> >>>>>> >>>>>>> True but those parts had the remains of vegetation that is only found >>>>>>> in Brazil so they obviously moved parts from a previous crash to the >>>>>>> Pentagon. >>>>>> >>>>>> And none of the thousands of people in the area noticed trucks >>>>>> bringing >>>>>> in airplane parts and scattering them around? >>>>>> >>>>>> You really are quite insane. >>>>>> >>>>>> <snip remaining kook babble> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> More importantly,...no one of those thousands of people you mention, >>>>> saw >>>>> anyone actually picking up plane parts, or videotaped this happening >>>>> We are only TOLD they were found. And shown pictures that could have >>>>> been >>>>> taken anywhere >>>> >>>> And we have yet another raving kook. >>>> >>>> <snip remaining kook babble> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Jim Pennino >>> >>> Funny that the only kook I see is Jim because Jet Fuel does not leave the >>> following tell tale signs behind: >>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>> >>> Rocky >>> >>> >> >> >> To say that means that you must be comparing it to a known event, what >> event would that be? > > T-annoy, you can look up what Controlled Demoltions leaves behind yourself > you clown. > > And since a collapse and a controlled demoltion should leave about the same > size rubble pile the photo above rules out both the official bullshit and a > controlled demoltion. > > And don't forget it took me 9 years before I could claim a nuke did the Twin > Towers in but what finally convinced me is a photo like the above and a > photo of Fiterman Hall proving it was destroyed by the deep underground nuke > used on WTC7. > > Now it is up to you to try and prove me wrong about what a controlled > demoltion leaves behind because I can't do everything for you and I should > not have to. DUH. > > Rocky > > OK so you can't or wont answer the question. Is it because you have no answer or that you are scared to post the answer. Either way your claim fails as you provide no evidence. Also I do not have to prove you wrong, because you have posted nothing to comment about. I await your usual evasive answer. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 07:26 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: 2 T-Annoy proves he is an asshole (was find your own evidence) |
| Message-ID | <ZbOdnf8n8NiCIUTInZ2dnUU7-S2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516037 |
"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:mrc9tl$ajv$2@dont-email.me... > \> OK so you can't or wont answer the question. > > Is it because you have no answer or that you are scared to post the > answer. WRONG ASSHOLE. The truth is the last time I had a link that proved how much debris a controlled demolition would leave behind it came from one of the Television Set Huggers like yourself so I'm just waiting for you to give me a link I can use. <G> But your refusal to do anything for truth means you know I can use links from the Television Set Huggers like yourself to prove them wrong. <G> Oh and what do Mike Walter one of the Crisis Actors from the Pentagon, Susan Smith the woman who murdered her own kids and John Gross from NIST all have in common? Here, I'll help you with that answer See: ><http://www.csoonline.com/article/2124218/fraud-prevention/4-ways-to-catch-a-liar.html><Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 07:38 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: 2 T-Annoy proves he is an asshole (was find your own evidence) |
| Message-ID | <ZdKdncqr5euaIkTInZ2dnUU7-b2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516062 |
redone to try and fix the last link "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:mrc9tl$ajv$2@dont-email.me... > \> OK so you can't or wont answer the question. > > Is it because you have no answer or that you are scared to post the > answer. WRONG ASSHOLE. The truth is the last time I had a link that proved how much debris a controlled demolition would leave behind it came from one of the Television Set Huggers like yourself so I'm just waiting for you to give me a link I can use. <G> But your refusal to do anything for truth means you know I can use links from the Television Set Huggers like yourself to prove them wrong. <G> Oh and what do Mike Walter one of the Crisis Actors from the Pentagon, Susan Smith the woman who murdered her own kids and John Gross from NIST all have in common? Here, I'll help you with that answer See: ><http://www.csoonline.com/article/2124218/fraud-prevention/4-ways-to-catch-a-liar.html><Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 07:40 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: 2 T-Annoy proves he is an asshole (was find your own evidence) |
| Message-ID | <KPadndH-pvLRIkTInZ2dnUU7-YGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516064 |
Shit, I'll just leave the "Rocky" off of the end of this post to save the last link "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:mrc9tl$ajv$2@dont-email.me... > \> OK so you can't or wont answer the question. > > Is it because you have no answer or that you are scared to post the > answer. WRONG ASSHOLE. The truth is the last time I had a link that proved how much debris a controlled demolition would leave behind it came from one of the Television Set Huggers like yourself so I'm just waiting for you to give me a link I can use. <G> But your refusal to do anything for truth means you know I can use links from the Television Set Huggers like yourself to prove them wrong. <G> Oh and what do Mike Walter one of the Crisis Actors from the Pentagon, Susan Smith the woman who murdered her own kids and John Gross from NIST all have in common? Here, I'll help you with that answer See: http://www.csoonline.com/article/2124218/fraud-prevention/4-ways-to-catch-a-liar.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 17:45 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: 2 T-Annoy proves he is an asshole (was find your own evidence) |
| Message-ID | <mrct7u$odc$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #516062 |
On 23/08/2015 13:26, Rocky wrote: > "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message > news:mrc9tl$ajv$2@dont-email.me... >> \> OK so you can't or wont answer the question. >> >> Is it because you have no answer or that you are scared to post the >> answer. > > WRONG ASSHOLE. Can you point me to the right ASSHOLE/ > > The truth is the last time I had a link that proved how much debris a > controlled demolition would leave behind it came from one of the Television > Set Huggers like yourself so I'm just waiting for you to give me a link I > can use. <G> > What a perfectly stupid answer. You harp on about 911 being a ncd, but can not cite a ncd to compare to. You talk about a jet fuel demolition but can not cite one to compare to. > But your refusal to do anything for truth means you know I can use links > from the Television Set Huggers like yourself to prove them wrong. <G> > Pray do so. > Oh and what do Mike Walter one of the Crisis Actors from the Pentagon, Susan > Smith the woman who murdered her own kids and John Gross from NIST all have > in common? > > Here, I'll help you with that answer See: > ><http://www.csoonline.com/article/2124218/fraud-prevention/4-ways-to-catch-a-liar.html><Rocky > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 11:59 -0500 |
| Subject | T-Annoy proves he is still an asshole (was find your own evidence) |
| Message-ID | <hqKdnW_4XZgLZkTInZ2dnUU7-YmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516112 |
"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:mrct7u$odc$2@dont-email.me... > On 23/08/2015 13:26, Rocky wrote: >> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >> news:mrc9tl$ajv$2@dont-email.me... >>> \> OK so you can't or wont answer the question. >>> >>> Is it because you have no answer or that you are scared to post the >>> answer. >> >> WRONG ASSHOLE. > > Can you point me to the right ASSHOLE Yes I can point you the correct assholes and they were called NIST. See: NIST's Evasion http://911review.com/coverup/nist.html Fact is it is your buddies at NIST who have used the most evasive actions with outright lies as proven by the following: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence https://youtu.be/zvCuMULutHs?list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8yvK1-a9H_11kBDS8W
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 18:19 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: T-Annoy proves he is still an asshole (was find your own evidence) |
| Message-ID | <mrcv77$vir$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #516117 |
On 23/08/2015 17:59, Rocky wrote: > "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message > news:mrct7u$odc$2@dont-email.me... >> On 23/08/2015 13:26, Rocky wrote: >>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >>> news:mrc9tl$ajv$2@dont-email.me... >>>> \> OK so you can't or wont answer the question. >>>> >>>> Is it because you have no answer or that you are scared to post the >>>> answer. >>> >>> WRONG ASSHOLE. >> >> Can you point me to the right ASSHOLE > > Yes I can point you the correct assholes and they were called NIST. See: > > NIST's Evasion > http://911review.com/coverup/nist.html > > Fact is it is your buddies at NIST who have used the most evasive actions > with outright lies as proven by the following: > > NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence > https://youtu.be/zvCuMULutHs?list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8yvK1-a9H_11kBDS8W > > So you are still resorting to editing out questions you don't like. Well I expect if you answered the questions it would prove that your claims fail. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 12:45 -0500 |
| Subject | T-Annoy proves he is still a big asshole (was find your own evidence) |
| Message-ID | <6fedncseiPzam0fInZ2dnUU7-aednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516141 |
"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:mrcv77$vir$1@dont-email.me... > On 23/08/2015 17:59, Rocky wrote: >> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >> news:mrct7u$odc$2@dont-email.me... >>> On 23/08/2015 13:26, Rocky wrote: >>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >>>> news:mrc9tl$ajv$2@dont-email.me... >>>>> \> OK so you can't or wont answer the question. >>>>> >>>>> Is it because you have no answer or that you are scared to post the >>>>> answer. >>>> >>>> WRONG ASSHOLE. >>> >>> Can you point me to the right ASSHOLE >> >> Yes I can point you the correct assholes and they were called NIST. See: >> >> NIST's Evasion >> http://911review.com/coverup/nist.html >> >> Fact is it is your buddies at NIST who have used the most evasive actions >> with outright lies as proven by the following: >> >> NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence >> https://youtu.be/zvCuMULutHs?list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8yvK1-a9H_11kBDS8W >> >> > > So you are still resorting to editing out questions you don't like. > Well I expect if you answered the questions it would prove that your > claims fail. You are just being an asshole because if you really wanted to know the truth about 9/11 you would have already seen numerous inconsistencies in the bullshit from the media. Basically if you can't help yourself why should I? Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 18:10 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: T-Annoy proves he is still a big asshole (was find your own evidence) |
| Message-ID | <guepac-km4.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #516152 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > You are just being an asshole because if you really wanted to know the truth > about 9/11 you would have already seen numerous inconsistencies in the > bullshit from the media. What has the media to do with your raving nonsense, kook? You babble like it was 1815 and the only source of news was the weekly local paper, kook. The facts are some airliners were hijacked. Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed almost 2 hours later. One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. Everything else is kook babble. That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble. That there is missing rubble is kook babble. That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble. That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble. That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear devices is kook babble. That there was an EMP is kook babble. That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not seen by every seismograph in the world is kook babble. That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything to do with what happened is kook babble. That the scene was radioactive is kook babble. That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima or Nagasaki is kook babble. That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear is kook babble. That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance and still be expected to work is kook babble. That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear bombs is kook babble. That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the airplanes hit the towers is kook babble. That all the video was CGI is kook babble. That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble. That the exterior walls were anything other than supports for the windows is kook babble. That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble. That a shotgun works anything like an underground nuclear explosion is kook babble. There is nothing in an airplane that transmits the flight number to ATC and saying the transponder does that is kook babble. Saying a missile of any kind hit the Pentagon is kook babble. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature that can be detected anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the collapse of the two towers as well as the plane crash at the Pentagon and the crash in Pennsyvania were detected. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. Saying people worship their television and capitalizing "television" is kook babble. Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 13:29 -0500 |
| Subject | Jim proves he can't see people impeach themselves |
| Message-ID | <XLOdnQreyZsijUfInZ2dnUU7-VednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516173 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:guepac-km4.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> You are just being an asshole because if you really wanted to know the >> truth >> about 9/11 you would have already seen numerous inconsistencies in the >> bullshit from the media. > > What has the media to do with your raving nonsense, kook? WTF??? You mean you believed the very bad Crisis Actor Mike Walter as he changed is story right on camera and then how many other witnesses to the alleged Flight 77 claim to have seen the wings fold back at lightening speed without shattering into debris that would have remained on the yard of the PentaCON? Here, incase you missed Mike Walter changing his story because in reality he was impeaching himself. Also see Mike add the unbelievable story of a 757 folding it's wings back just like a bird folds it's wings back to go into a birdhouse: 9/11 Pentagon Attack Eyewitness Mike Walter https://youtu.be/f0vxc50xAbk Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web