Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #515431 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-20 19:57 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-08-28 12:27 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 137 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-20 19:57 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-20 17:09 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 20:59 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 05:10 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 08:24 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-21 15:23 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 20:53 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 16:12 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 16:13 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 08:09 +1000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:08 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 17:01 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 17:12 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 09:58 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 08:15 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 10:23 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-22 16:47 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:48 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:45 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:47 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 08:10 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 11:27 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-22 17:38 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 16:49 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-22 17:51 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 23:29 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:28 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:16 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 09:11 +0100
2 T-Annoy find your own evidence (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 05:51 -0500
Re: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 12:15 +0100
Re: 2 T-Annoy proves he is an asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:26 -0500
Re: 2 T-Annoy proves he is an asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:38 -0500
Re: 2 T-Annoy proves he is an asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:40 -0500
Re: 2 T-Annoy proves he is an asshole (was find your own evidence) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 17:45 +0100
T-Annoy proves he is still an asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 11:59 -0500
Re: T-Annoy proves he is still an asshole (was find your own evidence) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 18:19 +0100
T-Annoy proves he is still a big asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 12:45 -0500
Re: T-Annoy proves he is still a big asshole (was find your own evidence) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:10 +0000
Jim proves he can't see people impeach themselves "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:29 -0500
Re: Jim proves he can't see people impeach themselves jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:33 +0000
Re: Jim proves he can't see people impeach themselves "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:06 -0500
Re: Jim proves he can't see people impeach themselves je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:31 -0700
Re: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:47 -0500
Caught Kent in a BIG LIE (was: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit)) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:14 -0500
Re: Caught Kent in a BIG LIE (was: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit)) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 08:39 -0500
Re: Caught Kent in a BIG LIE (was: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 15:00 +0100
Re: Caught Kent in a BIG LIE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:00 +0000
Re: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 16:58 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:47 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:46 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:50 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 21:07 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-22 15:11 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 22:57 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-22 21:17 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-22 14:42 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-22 22:58 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 00:43 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 00:16 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:07 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 06:05 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 16:12 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 01:16 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:10 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-20 17:35 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 20:59 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 05:37 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 08:41 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 06:55 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-21 07:40 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 16:34 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 14:45 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 16:52 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-21 22:53 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-22 08:42 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 09:20 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 09:53 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:47 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:16 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:34 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:06 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 11:13 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-22 18:02 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 17:12 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-21 21:36 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:07 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:06 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:06 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 10:03 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 20:17 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:59 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 19:07 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-23 09:07 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 06:08 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 21:22 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-22 21:31 -0700
Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut: (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 10:43 -0500
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut: jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:01 +0000
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut: Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 19:38 +0200
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:08 -0500
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:35 +0000
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:05 -0500
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 13:06 -0700
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 21:47 +0200
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 12:59 -0700
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut: (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 11:38 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:19 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 16:10 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 10:43 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:49 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-23 04:44 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-22 21:55 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 06:27 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 07:24 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 09:56 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 12:08 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 10:46 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 12:59 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:14 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:02 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:02 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-27 19:21 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 15:39 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 14:05 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:10 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-27 18:17 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 06:31 +0200
Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-28 13:54 -0400
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 04:42 +0200
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 04:09 +0000
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 18:12 +0200
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 03:17 -0400
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 14:17 -0700
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 03:16 -0400
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 17:17 +0200
box cutters were not illegal, at that time noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 12:27 -0700
Page 3 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 Next page →
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 18:33 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Jim proves he can't see people impeach themselves |
| Message-ID | <48gpac-7s4.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #516179 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > WTF??? You mean you believed the very bad Crisis Actor Mike Walter as he > changed is story right on camera and then how many other witnesses to the > alleged Flight 77 claim to have seen the wings fold back at lightening speed > without shattering into debris that would have remained on the yard of the > PentaCON? Babbling, raving, nonsense, kook. The facts are some airliners were hijacked. Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed almost 2 hours later. One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. Everything else is kook babble. That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble. That there is missing rubble is kook babble. That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble. That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble. That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear devices is kook babble. That there was an EMP is kook babble. That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not seen by every seismograph in the world is kook babble. That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything to do with what happened is kook babble. That the scene was radioactive is kook babble. That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima or Nagasaki is kook babble. That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear is kook babble. That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance and still be expected to work is kook babble. That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear bombs is kook babble. That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the airplanes hit the towers is kook babble. That all the video was CGI is kook babble. That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble. That the exterior walls were anything other than supports for the windows is kook babble. That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble. That a shotgun works anything like an underground nuclear explosion is kook babble. There is nothing in an airplane that transmits the flight number to ATC and saying the transponder does that is kook babble. Saying a missile of any kind hit the Pentagon is kook babble. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature that can be detected anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the collapse of the two towers as well as the plane crash at the Pentagon and the crash in Pennsyvania were detected. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. Saying people worship their television and capitalizing "television" is kook babble. Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 14:06 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Jim proves he can't see people impeach themselves |
| Message-ID | <td6kta1kmvtvpfbg1hm2562fa6fida0ies@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #516179 |
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 13:29:56 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
><jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>news:guepac-km4.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> You are just being an asshole because if you really wanted to know the
>>> truth
>>> about 9/11 you would have already seen numerous inconsistencies in the
>>> bullshit from the media.
>>
>> What has the media to do with your raving nonsense, kook?
>
>WTF??? You mean you believed the very bad Crisis Actor Mike Walter as he
>changed is story right on camera and then how many other witnesses to the
>alleged Flight 77 claim to have seen the wings fold back at lightening speed
>without shattering into debris that would have remained on the yard of the
>PentaCON?
>
>Here, incase you missed Mike Walter changing his story because in reality he
>was impeaching himself. Also see Mike add the unbelievable story of a 757
>folding it's wings back just like a bird folds it's wings back to go into a
>birdhouse:
>
>9/11 Pentagon Attack Eyewitness Mike Walter
> https://youtu.be/f0vxc50xAbk
>
Wow. You just destroyed your claim with the video. You do this
sort of thing a lot.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 13:31 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Jim proves he can't see people impeach themselves |
| Message-ID | <charlie-gordon1492-0305C8.13313323082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> |
| In reply to | #516179 |
In article <XLOdnQreyZsijUfInZ2dnUU7-VednZ2d@giganews.com>, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > alleged Flight 77 claim to have seen the wings fold back at lightening speed > without shattering into debris that would have remained on the yard of the > PentaCON? There was debris on the lawn outside the Pentagon. And debris inside the Pentagon. -- Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 06:47 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit) |
| Message-ID | <3mcjta5vk4c1qob7cms06a0o5j751ahnot@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #516032 |
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 05:51:54 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
[...]
>>> Funny that the only kook I see is Jim because Jet Fuel does not leave the
>>> following tell tale signs behind:
>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>
>>
>> To say that means that you must be comparing it to a known event, what
>> event would that be?
>
>T-annoy, you can look up what Controlled Demoltions leaves behind yourself
>you clown.
>
The picture you link to above is PROOF that the buildings came
down as a result of an uncontrolled collapse.
>And since a collapse and a controlled demoltion should leave about the same
>size rubble pile the photo above rules out both the official bullshit and a
>controlled demoltion.
A controlled demolition will leave a fairly nice pile of debris.
An uncontrolled collapse, as happened on 9/11, will leave what is show
in the picture linked above.
>
>And don't forget it took me 9 years before I could claim a nuke did the Twin
>Towers in but what finally convinced me is a photo like the above and a
>photo of Fiterman Hall proving it was destroyed by the deep underground nuke
>used on WTC7.
But no nukes were used. You've proved this yourself.
>
>Now it is up to you to try and prove me wrong about what a controlled
>demoltion leaves behind because I can't do everything for you and I should
>not have to. DUH.
You proved the claim of nukes wrong yourself. Several times. The
picture you link to is absolute proof that no controlled demolition,
of any sort, occurred.
You can whine about it, and I expect you will, but you provided
the evidence that proves your claims wrong.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 07:14 -0500 |
| Subject | Caught Kent in a BIG LIE (was: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit)) |
| Message-ID | <xcSdnWDHyezdJETInZ2dnUU7-T-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516051 |
"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message news:3mcjta5vk4c1qob7cms06a0o5j751ahnot@4ax.com... > On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 05:51:54 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > [...] > >>>> Funny that the only kook I see is Jim because Jet Fuel does not leave >>>> the >>>> following tell tale signs behind: >>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>> >>> >>> To say that means that you must be comparing it to a known event, what >>> event would that be? >> >>T-annoy, you can look up what Controlled Demoltions leaves behind yourself >>you clown. >> > > The picture you link to above is PROOF that the buildings came > down as a result of an uncontrolled collapse. Keep going. Stopping there is a sign of a liar because everybody knows a nuke can vaporize buildings but nobody can say that jet fuel can vaporize buildings unless if they are telling a big big big lie like you. <G> >>And since a collapse and a controlled demoltion should leave about the >>same >>size rubble pile the photo above rules out both the official bullshit and >>a >>controlled demoltion. > > A controlled demolition will leave a fairly nice pile of debris. > An uncontrolled collapse, as happened on 9/11, will leave what is show > in the picture linked above. ROTFLMAO because if you try to explain why jet fuel can vaporize buildings you will end up filling your post with inconsistencies that will also prove you are a BIG LIAR. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 08:39 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Caught Kent in a BIG LIE (was: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit)) |
| Message-ID | <79jjtat1sv6oafedehlgp7876u81kslmfb@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #516056 |
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 07:14:14 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:3mcjta5vk4c1qob7cms06a0o5j751ahnot@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 05:51:54 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>>> Funny that the only kook I see is Jim because Jet Fuel does not leave
>>>>> the following tell tale signs behind:
>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> To say that means that you must be comparing it to a known event, what
>>>> event would that be?
>>>
>>>T-annoy, you can look up what Controlled Demoltions leaves behind yourself
>>>you clown.
>>
>> The picture you link to above is PROOF that the buildings came
>> down as a result of an uncontrolled collapse.
>
>Keep going. Stopping there is a sign of a liar because everybody knows a
>nuke can vaporize buildings but nobody can say that jet fuel can vaporize
>buildings unless if they are telling a big big big lie like you. <G>
>
I've not claimed jet fuel vaporized anything.
Is lying and claiming I did a benefit? If so, please explain how
your openly lying about what I've claimed benefits you. I honestly
don't see it.
>
>>>And since a collapse and a controlled demoltion should leave about the
>>>same
>>>size rubble pile the photo above rules out both the official bullshit and
>>>a controlled demoltion.
>>
>> A controlled demolition will leave a fairly nice pile of debris.
>> An uncontrolled collapse, as happened on 9/11, will leave what is show
>> in the picture linked above.
>
>ROTFLMAO because if you try to explain why jet fuel can vaporize buildings
>you will end up filling your post with inconsistencies that will also prove
>you are a BIG LIAR.
Your LIE that I've made a claim you know I've never made is not
helping you.
And who is Kent? You replied to me, but use the name Kent in the
subject. Please explain.
How's that whole ignoring my posts working out for you?
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 15:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Caught Kent in a BIG LIE (was: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence |
| Message-ID | <mrcjj3$glr$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #516056 |
On 23/08/2015 13:14, Rocky wrote: > "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:3mcjta5vk4c1qob7cms06a0o5j751ahnot@4ax.com... >> On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 05:51:54 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> [...] >> >>>>> Funny that the only kook I see is Jim because Jet Fuel does not leave >>>>> the >>>>> following tell tale signs behind: >>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>>> >>>> >>>> To say that means that you must be comparing it to a known event, what >>>> event would that be? >>> >>> T-annoy, you can look up what Controlled Demoltions leaves behind yourself >>> you clown. >>> >> >> The picture you link to above is PROOF that the buildings came >> down as a result of an uncontrolled collapse. > > Keep going. Stopping there is a sign of a liar because everybody knows a > nuke can vaporize buildings but nobody can say that jet fuel can vaporize > buildings unless if they are telling a big big big lie like you. <G> > > You seem to be the only person saying that jet fuel can vaporise buildings, nobody else has. >>> And since a collapse and a controlled demoltion should leave about the >>> same >>> size rubble pile the photo above rules out both the official bullshit and >>> a >>> controlled demoltion. >> >> A controlled demolition will leave a fairly nice pile of debris. >> An uncontrolled collapse, as happened on 9/11, will leave what is show >> in the picture linked above. > > ROTFLMAO because if you try to explain why jet fuel can vaporize buildings > you will end up filling your post with inconsistencies that will also prove > you are a BIG LIAR. > > Rocky > > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 17:00 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Caught Kent in a BIG LIE |
| Message-ID | <tpapac-e84.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #516056 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Keep going. Stopping there is a sign of a liar because everybody knows a > nuke can vaporize buildings but nobody can say that jet fuel can vaporize > buildings unless if they are telling a big big big lie like you. <G> When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected by nearby seismographs. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 16:58 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence |
| Message-ID | <qmapac-e84.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #516032 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: <snip kook babble> > And don't forget it took me 9 years before I could claim a nuke did the Twin > Towers in but what finally convinced me is a photo like the above and a > photo of Fiterman Hall proving it was destroyed by the deep underground nuke > used on WTC7. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected by nearby seismographs. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 06:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <3lcjta5om3t8j9ft1a448odu10rb1hmbv6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #515929 |
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 20:28:41 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
><jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>news:f8dnac-j8r.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <snip kook babble>
>>>>
>>>>> True but those parts had the remains of vegetation that is only found
>>>>> in Brazil so they obviously moved parts from a previous crash to the
>>>>> Pentagon.
>>>>
>>>> And none of the thousands of people in the area noticed trucks bringing
>>>> in airplane parts and scattering them around?
>>>>
>>>> You really are quite insane.
>>>>
>>>> <snip remaining kook babble>
>>>
>>>
>>> More importantly,...no one of those thousands of people you mention, saw
>>> anyone actually picking up plane parts, or videotaped this happening
>>> We are only TOLD they were found. And shown pictures that could have been
>>> taken anywhere
>>
>> And we have yet another raving kook.
>>
>> <snip remaining kook babble>
>
>Funny that the only kook I see is Jim because Jet Fuel does not leave the
>following tell tale signs behind:
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
It is fortunate no one claims jet fuel alone caused the buildings
to collapse.
Your DESPERATE attempt to divert from your inability to learn is
kind of funny. Are you going to continue?
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 06:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <gkcjtahknjfn44m30kog6empkdbu5vst0e@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #515890 |
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 17:51:54 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>> <snip kook babble>
>>
>>> True but those parts had the remains of vegetation that is only found
>>> in Brazil so they obviously moved parts from a previous crash to the
>>> Pentagon.
>>
>> And none of the thousands of people in the area noticed trucks bringing
>> in airplane parts and scattering them around?
>>
>> You really are quite insane.
>>
>> <snip remaining kook babble>
>
>
>More importantly,...no one of those thousands of people you mention, saw
>anyone actually picking up plane parts, or videotaped this happening
>We are only TOLD they were found. And shown pictures that could have been
>taken anywhere
>
>After we were told by an on the scene reporter that morning, that there was
>only a hole in the wall with no sign of a plane.
>
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ
>
>Do you really think a reporter wouldn't know the difference ?
>
>
>But hey,....if your 9/11 report booklet of fairytales told you that they
>found the recipe for making gold from lead, and made a working cold-fusion
>reactor,....you would be telling us that was true as well.
>
At what point did you lose all contact with reality?
Serious question.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 12:50 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <jhdhta9kop41pkfgjoik3l5sgoleodkrhm@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #515789 |
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:27:22 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
>wrote in message >
>>>> The FBI didn't say Barbara Olson didn't speak to Ted Olson, you
>>>> retarded fuckwit.
>
>They said the call was not completed. To me that means the call was not
>completed. DUH.
>
Only the first one. The rest were completed. DUH!
>
>> Plane parts from a 757 were found inside
>
>True but those parts had the remains of vegetation that is only found in
>Brazil so they obviously moved parts from a previous crash to the Pentagon.
>
WHAT?
I await your evidence of this with great anticipation.
>
>> and outside the
>> Pentagon
>
>But that single engine was carried out from inside the Pentagon and why was
>only one engine found when they should have found two engines and engines
>don't burn up very easily.
>
All the engines were found, stupid. That photos of the first one
being removed is all you've seen doesn't mean others weren't found.
>> including the black box for the flight in question.
>
>ROTFLMAO because the flight data shows it was too high to hit the Pentaton.
><G>
Not according to every credible site I've seen. Some k00k sites
claim it was too high, but they either offer no evidence for the claim
(like you) or use falsified evidence.
>
>> That your broken brain can't accept reality is nothing more than
>> proof of how broken it is.
>
>ROTFLMAO because love is blind and you are too in love with your Television
>Set to see that 9/11 was one great big hoax.
>
You can continue to try and make TV a pejorative, if you must.
You will, of course, continue to fail.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 21:07 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <f12d3f2557f27484173f18b358dfc752@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #515789 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky, in <news:ZbCdnczsqY8TP0XInZ2dnUU7-IednZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> > wrote in message > >>>> The FBI didn't say Barbara Olson didn't speak to Ted Olson, you >>>> retarded fuckwit. > Th<SMACKAKOOK!> Snipping out the evidence that you're a delusional retard won't do you any good, nor will it ameliorate your psychosis, Ko0K. I quote the FBI: "57. The records available for the phone calls from American 77 do not allow for a determination of which of four 'connected calls to unknown numbers' represent the two between Barbara and Ted Olson, although the FBI and DOJ believe that all four represent communications between Barbara Olson and her husband's office (all family members of the Flight 77 passengers and crew were canvassed to see if they had received any phone calls from the hijacked flight, and only Renee May's parents and Ted Olson indicated that they had received such calls). The four calls were at 9:15:34 for 1 minute, 42 seconds; 9:20:15 for 4 minutes, 34 seconds; 9:25:48 for 2 minutes, 34 seconds; and 9:30:56 for 4 minutes, 20 seconds. FBI report,"American Airlines Airphone Usage," Sept. 20, 2001; FBI report of investigation, interview of Theodore Olson, Sept. 11, 2001; FBI report of investigation, interview of Helen Voss, Sept. 14, 2001; AAL response to the Commission's supplemental document request, Jan. 20, 2004. Footnote 57 to Chapter 1, 9/11 Commission Report" Notice especially the text blurb "the FBI and DOJ believe that all four represent communications between Barbara Olson and her husband's office", you fucking delusional little monkey. Kook. LOL >> Plane parts from a 757 were found inside > True<SMACKAKOOK!> Good of you to finally clear the fog from your befuddled brain long enough to admit that no missile hit the Pentagon, you delusional fucktard. As to your other k'lame, claims without proof can be dismissed without evidence... your k'lame that vegetation from Brazil was found on the Flight 77 plane parts is yet another manufactured factoid from a broken brain. Kook. LOL >> and outside the Pentagon > Bu<SMACKAKOOK!> No full engine was found, you delusional fuckwit. They found bits and pieces of both engines. Stop blathering on about your fucking delusion and get back on your meds, you brain-damaged fuckwit. Kook. LOL >> including the black box for the flight in question. > RO<SMACKAKOOK!> <http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2010/Calibration%20of%20altimeter_92.pdf> <https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2010/Calibration%20of%20altimeter_92.pdf> ============================== Some time ago one of the authors, Warren Stutt, who independently received a copy of the FDR file as a result of his FOIA request, discovered more data at the end of the file which had not previously been decoded. He recently managed to decode the last frame and has made the information freely available. The file contains a vast amount of data, including the following essential information: the vertical acceleration every eighth of a second; longitudinal acceleration, roll angle and pitch every quarter of a second; air speed, ground speed, pressure altitude, radio height, heading and position every second; all finishing at points within the last second. The last time stated in the file is 9:37:49, which is in the 4th last subframe. Three more subframes were recorded, one second each, bringing the time of the last recording to 9:37:52, 6 or 8 seconds later than the two official times of impact. ============================== You'll note the graph of Pitch, Roll and Wheel on page 5 of that report proves that the plane had pitched *down* in the last 2 seconds prior to impact. At no time from 5 seconds out was the pitch steep enough to pull the plane up and over the building. At the last 2 seconds or so, the amount of pitch required at that speed to pull the plane up and over the building would have induced stresses of over 5 g upward force to get the plane up over the building at that speed, and that would have literally ripped the wings off the plane. That's nearly twice what the plane is designed to withstand. "As already mentioned, it has been asserted by one group that it would be impossible for the plane to survive pull-up after passing over the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) radio antenna tower, as it would require a wing loading of over 10.14g. This claim is, however, easily shown to be incorrect. It results from an unfounded assumption that the plane would have traveled in a straight line from the tower to the first light pole before commencing the pull-up. The graph above (Fig. 14) shows that this assumption is not justified, as a strong g-force commences at about 2 seconds prior to impact, while the first pole is not hit until about 1.3 seconds prior to impact. Also their calculation has been shown to contain a large mathematical error, which more than doubles the force required." The strong g-forces mentioned were merely the pilot trying to level the plane after rapidly descending from ~2000 feet while accelerating 60 kpm beyond the plane's rated dive speed and trying to deal with wing flutter. Momentum at that speed is a bitch. You'll note the graphs on page 6 and 11 showing true altitude of the plane. At no time did it pull up, it's true altitude continued to drop up until impact. And it was accelerating as it dove. Once the plane got close enough that ground effect provided buoyancy to the plane, the pilot simply held slight down flaps and steered toward his target. Final pitch was -1.2 degrees. "This analysis clearly shows that the claim that the FDR file provides evidence that the plane was too high to hit the Pentagon is without foundation. It is true that the altimeter indicated that the plane was too high but the radio height system did not. Based on the data and analysis presented above, there is no reason to distrust radio height but there is ample reason to distrust the altimeter on descent at low altitudes, especially at very high speeds." IOW, they have two altitude measurement systems. Radio altitude, which is highly accurate at low altitudes and is used for landings, and the altimeter, which is used for cruising (it is less accurate, but an accuracy of +-50 feet isn't a problem at cruise altitude) because the radio altitude is inaccurate at high altitudes. The altimeter is set to read elevation at the take-off airport, so it was set to ground level and atmospheric pressure at Dulles. Thus the discrepancy between ground level and altimeter wasn't a discrepancy at all... the altimeter "thought" ground level was at Dulles' 312 feet. "The data file recorded the altitude of the plane on the ground at Dulles, from where the final flight began, as 40 feet. Atmospheric pressure at the time was 1023.23 hPa and temperature was 18 C, 3 degrees above standard temperature. If the pressure and temperature difference from standard atmosphere is allowed for, calculation shows the displayed altitude would rise 272 feet, reaching 312 feet, which is the published elevation for Dulles International Airport. The adjustment may be confirmed using this calculator: http://www.luizmonteiro.com/Learning_ALT_Errors_Sim.aspx It is therefore apparent that the data file recorded raw altitude at Dulles in terms of standard pressure and that no error was present at the time." You fucking idiot. Get back on your meds. "The recent complete decoding of the FDR file has enlarged and clarified the information available and has thereby enabled resolution of the contradictions. It is clear that this file supports the official account of the course of flight AA 77 and the consequent impact with the Pentagon. The file thus also supports the majority of eyewitness reports." Kook. LOL >> That your broken brain can't accept reality is nothing more than >> proof of how broken it is. > ROT<SMACKAKOOK!> Delusional frothtards who are so clue-repellant that they snip out all evidence of their psychosis will continue to have their stupid slobbering mouths slapped shut each time they open their toothless maws to bawl out more bullshit, until such time as they are able to concisely explain exactly how their kooky conspiracy theory is able to violate several laws of physics. > Rocky Now, get to addressing the 16 ways your kook conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics: ====================================================== 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the video *you* provided wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was most likely the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights that was the source. You didn't specify what type of radiation was experienced, and I doubt you're smart or educated enough to even know what types of radiation there are. 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or anywhere in NYC. They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical support column and *NO* EMP: ====================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================== 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding rock. 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. 11) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes (MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3 nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is? While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps (radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in place without drawing any attention whatsoever. 12) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel sent down to service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire base at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? 13) You admitted (ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? 14) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic signatures for these 19 nukes (now 34 nukes, per your latest k'lame) you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? 15) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep underground, Ko0K? 16) Explain how these 19 nukes (now 34 nukes per your latest k'lame) could tunnel holes from their underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep, to directly under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). ====================================================== There are now 16 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp simple physics. Kook. LOL -- Rocky, your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the video *you* *provided* between the video disturbance due to satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (depending upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission... and since we're talking solid bedrock here, it'd be at the upper end of that scale). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain is now saying there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you know there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble or its vicinity. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) Now your broken brain is telling you, for some as-yet unfathomable reason, that there were 34 nukes, rather than your previously claimed 19 (or your previously, previously claimed 3), without explaining exactly how 34 nukes were attained and put into place without drawing any attention whatsoever (especially given that the WTC towers had regular rad sweeps because they were primarily rented by government agencies). Gullible idiots believe everything they read because their broken brains can't discern between reality and fantasy. LOL G) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those nuclear bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" on the video *you* *provided* and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So you've proven by skirting the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality. And the harder you try, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 15:11 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <op.x3r98pm0tm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #515829 |
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 15:07:28 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Rocky, in <news:ZbCdnczsqY8TP0XInZ2dnUU7-IednZ2d@giganews.com> > did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > >> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" >> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> >> wrote in message > > >>>>> The FBI didn't say Barbara Olson didn't speak to Ted Olson, you >>>>> retarded fuckwit. > >> Th<SMACKAKOOK!> > > Snipping out the evidence that you're a delusional retard won't > do you any good, nor will it ameliorate your psychosis, Ko0K. > > I quote the FBI: > "57. The records available for the phone calls from American 77 > do not allow for a determination of which of four 'connected > calls to unknown numbers' represent the two between Barbara and > Ted Olson, although the FBI and DOJ believe that all four > represent communications between Barbara Olson and her husband's > office (all family members of the Flight 77 passengers and crew > were canvassed to see if they had received any phone calls from > the hijacked flight, and only Renee May's parents and Ted Olson > indicated that they had received such calls). The four calls were > at 9:15:34 for 1 minute, 42 seconds; 9:20:15 for 4 minutes, 34 > seconds; 9:25:48 for 2 minutes, 34 seconds; and 9:30:56 for 4 > minutes, 20 seconds. > FBI report,"American Airlines Airphone Usage," Sept. 20, 2001; > FBI report of investigation, interview of Theodore Olson, Sept. > 11, 2001; FBI report of investigation, interview of Helen Voss, > Sept. 14, 2001; AAL response to the Commission's supplemental > document request, Jan. 20, 2004. Footnote 57 to Chapter 1, 9/11 > Commission Report" > > Notice especially the text blurb "the FBI and DOJ believe that > all four represent communications between Barbara Olson and her > husband's office", you fucking delusional little monkey. > > Kook. LOL > >>> Plane parts from a 757 were found inside > >> True<SMACKAKOOK!> > > Good of you to finally clear the fog from your befuddled brain > long enough to admit that no missile hit the Pentagon, you > delusional fucktard. > > As to your other k'lame, claims without proof can be dismissed > without evidence... your k'lame that vegetation from Brazil was > found on the Flight 77 plane parts is yet another manufactured > factoid from a broken brain. > > Kook. LOL > >>> and outside the Pentagon > >> Bu<SMACKAKOOK!> > > No full engine was found, you delusional fuckwit. They found bits > and pieces of both engines. Stop blathering on about your fucking > delusion and get back on your meds, you brain-damaged fuckwit. > > Kook. LOL > >>> including the black box for the flight in question. > >> RO<SMACKAKOOK!> > > <http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2010/Calibration%20of%20altimeter_92.pdf> > > <https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2010/Calibration%20of%20altimeter_92.pdf> > ============================== > Some time ago one of the authors, Warren Stutt, who independently > received a copy of the FDR file as a result of his FOIA request, > discovered more data at the end of the file which had not > previously been decoded. He recently managed to decode the last > frame and has made the information freely available. The file > contains a vast amount of data, including the following essential > information: the vertical acceleration every eighth of a second; > longitudinal acceleration, roll angle and pitch every quarter of > a second; air speed, ground speed, pressure altitude, radio > height, heading and position every second; all finishing at > points within the last second. The last time stated in the file > is 9:37:49, which is in the 4th last subframe. Three more > subframes were recorded, one second each, bringing the time of > the last recording to 9:37:52, 6 or 8 seconds later than the two > official times of impact. > ============================== > > You'll note the graph of Pitch, Roll and Wheel on page 5 of that > report proves that the plane had pitched *down* in the last 2 > seconds prior to impact. At no time from 5 seconds out was the > pitch steep enough to pull the plane up and over the building. At > the last 2 seconds or so, the amount of pitch required at that > speed to pull the plane up and over the building would have > induced stresses of over 5 g upward force to get the plane up > over the building at that speed, and that would have literally > ripped the wings off the plane. That's nearly twice what the > plane is designed to withstand. > > "As already mentioned, it has been asserted by one group that it > would be impossible for the plane to survive pull-up after > passing over the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) > radio antenna tower, as it would require a wing loading of over > 10.14g. This claim is, however, easily shown to be incorrect. It > results from an unfounded assumption that the plane would have > traveled in a straight line from the tower to the first light > pole before commencing the pull-up. The graph above (Fig. 14) > shows that this assumption is not justified, as a strong g-force > commences at about 2 seconds prior to impact, while the first > pole is not hit until about 1.3 seconds prior to impact. Also > their calculation has been shown to contain a large mathematical > error, which more than doubles the force required." > > The strong g-forces mentioned were merely the pilot trying to > level the plane after rapidly descending from ~2000 feet while > accelerating 60 kpm beyond the plane's rated dive speed and > trying to deal with wing flutter. Momentum at that speed is a > bitch. > > You'll note the graphs on page 6 and 11 showing true altitude of > the plane. At no time did it pull up, it's true altitude > continued to drop up until impact. And it was accelerating as it > dove. Once the plane got close enough that ground effect provided > buoyancy to the plane, the pilot simply held slight down flaps > and steered toward his target. Final pitch was -1.2 degrees. > > "This analysis clearly shows that the claim that the FDR file > provides evidence that the plane was too high to hit the Pentagon > is without foundation. It is true that the altimeter indicated > that the plane was too high but the radio height system did not. > Based on the data and analysis presented above, there is no > reason to distrust radio height but there is ample reason to > distrust the altimeter on descent at low altitudes, especially at > very high speeds." > > IOW, they have two altitude measurement systems. Radio altitude, > which is highly accurate at low altitudes and is used for > landings, and the altimeter, which is used for cruising (it is > less accurate, but an accuracy of +-50 feet isn't a problem at > cruise altitude) because the radio altitude is inaccurate at high > altitudes. The altimeter is set to read elevation at the take-off > airport, so it was set to ground level and atmospheric pressure > at Dulles. Thus the discrepancy between ground level and > altimeter wasn't a discrepancy at all... the altimeter "thought" > ground level was at Dulles' 312 feet. > > "The data file recorded the altitude of the plane on the ground > at Dulles, from where the final flight began, as 40 feet. > Atmospheric pressure at the time was 1023.23 hPa and temperature > was 18 C, 3 degrees above standard temperature. If the pressure > and temperature difference from standard atmosphere is allowed > for, calculation shows the displayed altitude would rise 272 > feet, reaching 312 feet, which is the published elevation for > Dulles International Airport. The adjustment may be confirmed > using this calculator: > http://www.luizmonteiro.com/Learning_ALT_Errors_Sim.aspx > It is therefore apparent that the data file recorded raw altitude > at Dulles in terms of standard pressure and that no error was > present at the time." > > You fucking idiot. Get back on your meds. > > "The recent complete decoding of the FDR file has enlarged and > clarified the information available and has thereby enabled > resolution of the contradictions. It is clear that this file > supports the official account of the course of flight AA 77 and > the consequent impact with the Pentagon. The file thus also > supports the majority of eyewitness reports." > > Kook. LOL > >>> That your broken brain can't accept reality is nothing more than >>> proof of how broken it is. > >> ROT<SMACKAKOOK!> > > Delusional frothtards who are so clue-repellant that they snip > out all evidence of their psychosis will continue to have their > stupid slobbering mouths slapped shut each time they open their > toothless maws to bawl out more bullshit, until such time as they > are able to concisely explain exactly how their kooky conspiracy > theory is able to violate several laws of physics. > >> Rocky > > Now, get to addressing the 16 ways your kook conspiracy theory > violates the laws of physics: > > ====================================================== > 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of > collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep > below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to > drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact > that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal > *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 > miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole > *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why > the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. > > 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the video *you* provided wasn't an > EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd > been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond > time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) > would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount > of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That > there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no > nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have > destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. > > 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that > there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. > If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have > shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was most > likely the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement > weapon sights that was the source. You didn't specify what type > of radiation was experienced, and I doubt you're smart or > educated enough to even know what types of radiation there are. > > 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex > or anywhere in NYC. They found tritium from the aircraft exit > signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial > sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for > all other sources of radiation. > > 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be > sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by > people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you > k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the > order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame > the bombs were buried. > > 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron > source. It naturally decays over time, and its decay byproducts, > the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, > include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon > poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger > being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start > any sort of nuclear chain reaction. > > 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* > *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling > vertical support column and *NO* EMP: > ====================== > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> > You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column > buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No > amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. > ====================== > > 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going > to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would > be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the > temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? > > 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through > a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into > surrounding rock. > > 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic > taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of > satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were > detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill > effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or > aircraft. > > 11) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes > (MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to > your previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously > k'lamed 3 nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain > is squirming under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, > screaming in agony at its being forced to see just how delusional > it truly is? While you're at it, get to explaining how the > regular rad sweeps (radiological surveys) at the twin towers > (because the space was primarily rented by government agencies) > showed no nukes or any contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes > were obtained and put in place without drawing any attention > whatsoever. > > 12) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel sent down to > service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source > triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic > basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire base at > 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology > to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 > blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area > the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced > to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched > for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to > survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? > > 13) You admitted (ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com) > that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers > (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked > off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your > admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of > the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" > (your words)? > > 14) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic > signatures for these 19 nukes (now 34 nukes, per your latest > k'lame) you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? > > 15) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris > kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep > underground, Ko0K? > > 16) Explain how these 19 nukes (now 34 nukes per your latest > k'lame) could tunnel holes from their underground installation > 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep, to directly under the WTC complex... > in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating > directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your > timing between the detonations and the collapses, leading you > back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, > you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go > 'round again.). > ====================================================== > > There are now 16 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the > laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each > one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a > retard who can't grasp simple physics. > > Kook. LOL > tell him about how the gubbament is out to get you, kemtrailK0ok! obliterate some more irony meters! :) -- http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 22:57 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ffbdaacd9fe1a4c7317e19f2e19cf082@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #515831 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3r98pm0tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 15:07:28 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler > Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >> >> Rocky, in <news:ZbCdnczsqY8TP0XInZ2dnUU7-IednZ2d@giganews.com> >> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" >>> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> >>> wrote in message > >>>>>> The FBI didn't say Barbara Olson didn't speak to Ted Olson, you >>>>>> retarded fuckwit. >>> Th<SMACKAKOOK!> >> Snipping out the evidence that you're a delusional retard won't >> do you any good, nor will it ameliorate your psychosis, Ko0K. >> >> I quote the FBI: >> "57. The records available for the phone calls from American 77 >> do not allow for a determination of which of four 'connected >> calls to unknown numbers' represent the two between Barbara and >> Ted Olson, although the FBI and DOJ believe that all four >> represent communications between Barbara Olson and her husband's >> office (all family members of the Flight 77 passengers and crew >> were canvassed to see if they had received any phone calls from >> the hijacked flight, and only Renee May's parents and Ted Olson >> indicated that they had received such calls). The four calls were >> at 9:15:34 for 1 minute, 42 seconds; 9:20:15 for 4 minutes, 34 >> seconds; 9:25:48 for 2 minutes, 34 seconds; and 9:30:56 for 4 >> minutes, 20 seconds. >> FBI report,"American Airlines Airphone Usage," Sept. 20, 2001; >> FBI report of investigation, interview of Theodore Olson, Sept. >> 11, 2001; FBI report of investigation, interview of Helen Voss, >> Sept. 14, 2001; AAL response to the Commission's supplemental >> document request, Jan. 20, 2004. Footnote 57 to Chapter 1, 9/11 >> Commission Report" >> >> Notice especially the text blurb "the FBI and DOJ believe that >> all four represent communications between Barbara Olson and her >> husband's office", you fucking delusional little monkey. >> >> Kook. LOL >>>> Plane parts from a 757 were found inside >>> True<SMACKAKOOK!> >> Good of you to finally clear the fog from your befuddled brain >> long enough to admit that no missile hit the Pentagon, you >> delusional fucktard. >> >> As to your other k'lame, claims without proof can be dismissed >> without evidence... your k'lame that vegetation from Brazil was >> found on the Flight 77 plane parts is yet another manufactured >> factoid from a broken brain. >> >> Kook. LOL >>>> and outside the Pentagon >>> Bu<SMACKAKOOK!> >> No full engine was found, you delusional fuckwit. They found bits >> and pieces of both engines. Stop blathering on about your fucking >> delusion and get back on your meds, you brain-damaged fuckwit. >> >> Kook. LOL >>>> including the black box for the flight in question. >>> RO<SMACKAKOOK!> >> <http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2010/Calibration%20of%20altimeter_92.pdf> >> >> <https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2010/Calibration%20of%20altimeter_92.pdf> >> ============================== >> Some time ago one of the authors, Warren Stutt, who independently >> received a copy of the FDR file as a result of his FOIA request, >> discovered more data at the end of the file which had not >> previously been decoded. He recently managed to decode the last >> frame and has made the information freely available. The file >> contains a vast amount of data, including the following essential >> information: the vertical acceleration every eighth of a second; >> longitudinal acceleration, roll angle and pitch every quarter of >> a second; air speed, ground speed, pressure altitude, radio >> height, heading and position every second; all finishing at >> points within the last second. The last time stated in the file >> is 9:37:49, which is in the 4th last subframe. Three more >> subframes were recorded, one second each, bringing the time of >> the last recording to 9:37:52, 6 or 8 seconds later than the two >> official times of impact. >> ============================== >> >> You'll note the graph of Pitch, Roll and Wheel on page 5 of that >> report proves that the plane had pitched *down* in the last 2 >> seconds prior to impact. At no time from 5 seconds out was the >> pitch steep enough to pull the plane up and over the building. At >> the last 2 seconds or so, the amount of pitch required at that >> speed to pull the plane up and over the building would have >> induced stresses of over 5 g upward force to get the plane up >> over the building at that speed, and that would have literally >> ripped the wings off the plane. That's nearly twice what the >> plane is designed to withstand. >> >> "As already mentioned, it has been asserted by one group that it >> would be impossible for the plane to survive pull-up after >> passing over the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) >> radio antenna tower, as it would require a wing loading of over >> 10.14g. This claim is, however, easily shown to be incorrect. It >> results from an unfounded assumption that the plane would have >> traveled in a straight line from the tower to the first light >> pole before commencing the pull-up. The graph above (Fig. 14) >> shows that this assumption is not justified, as a strong g-force >> commences at about 2 seconds prior to impact, while the first >> pole is not hit until about 1.3 seconds prior to impact. Also >> their calculation has been shown to contain a large mathematical >> error, which more than doubles the force required." >> >> The strong g-forces mentioned were merely the pilot trying to >> level the plane after rapidly descending from ~2000 feet while >> accelerating 60 kpm beyond the plane's rated dive speed and >> trying to deal with wing flutter. Momentum at that speed is a >> bitch. >> >> You'll note the graphs on page 6 and 11 showing true altitude of >> the plane. At no time did it pull up, it's true altitude >> continued to drop up until impact. And it was accelerating as it >> dove. Once the plane got close enough that ground effect provided >> buoyancy to the plane, the pilot simply held slight down flaps >> and steered toward his target. Final pitch was -1.2 degrees. >> >> "This analysis clearly shows that the claim that the FDR file >> provides evidence that the plane was too high to hit the Pentagon >> is without foundation. It is true that the altimeter indicated >> that the plane was too high but the radio height system did not. >> Based on the data and analysis presented above, there is no >> reason to distrust radio height but there is ample reason to >> distrust the altimeter on descent at low altitudes, especially at >> very high speeds." >> >> IOW, they have two altitude measurement systems. Radio altitude, >> which is highly accurate at low altitudes and is used for >> landings, and the altimeter, which is used for cruising (it is >> less accurate, but an accuracy of +-50 feet isn't a problem at >> cruise altitude) because the radio altitude is inaccurate at high >> altitudes. The altimeter is set to read elevation at the take-off >> airport, so it was set to ground level and atmospheric pressure >> at Dulles. Thus the discrepancy between ground level and >> altimeter wasn't a discrepancy at all... the altimeter "thought" >> ground level was at Dulles' 312 feet. >> >> "The data file recorded the altitude of the plane on the ground >> at Dulles, from where the final flight began, as 40 feet. >> Atmospheric pressure at the time was 1023.23 hPa and temperature >> was 18 C, 3 degrees above standard temperature. If the pressure >> and temperature difference from standard atmosphere is allowed >> for, calculation shows the displayed altitude would rise 272 >> feet, reaching 312 feet, which is the published elevation for >> Dulles International Airport. The adjustment may be confirmed >> using this calculator: >> http://www.luizmonteiro.com/Learning_ALT_Errors_Sim.aspx >> It is therefore apparent that the data file recorded raw altitude >> at Dulles in terms of standard pressure and that no error was >> present at the time." >> >> You fucking idiot. Get back on your meds. >> >> "The recent complete decoding of the FDR file has enlarged and >> clarified the information available and has thereby enabled >> resolution of the contradictions. It is clear that this file >> supports the official account of the course of flight AA 77 and >> the consequent impact with the Pentagon. The file thus also >> supports the majority of eyewitness reports." >> >> Kook. LOL >>>> That your broken brain can't accept reality is nothing more than >>>> proof of how broken it is. >>> ROT<SMACKAKOOK!> >> Delusional frothtards who are so clue-repellant that they snip >> out all evidence of their psychosis will continue to have their >> stupid slobbering mouths slapped shut each time they open their >> toothless maws to bawl out more bullshit, until such time as they >> are able to concisely explain exactly how their kooky conspiracy >> theory is able to violate several laws of physics. > tell him about how the gubbament is out to get you, Oh look, another delusional frothtard steps up, thinking it's "Get Your Stupid Slobbering Mouth Slapped Shut Day". LOL No idea what you're kooking out about now, DildoRider... is it because you k'lamed your libtard comrades weren't proposing chemtrails to cause global dimming, and I proved they were, as far back as 1996 to today? You know, the post that you ran away from after getting your teeth kicked in, thereby tacitly admitting you were *wrong* because you're a delusional libtard? LOL Message-ID: <9f29b4c9531f669cfa3509755ff91f80@dizum.com> SPNAK! on the delusional libtard fuckwit. <snicker> > kemtrailK0ok! >From the MID above: "I never said I believed in it, merely that members of your libtard collective have proposed it. Stoooopid. LOL" Stoooopid. LOL > obliterate some more irony meters! :) He says, as he tries to *melt* all the irony meters from the heat of his frothing meltdown. LOL -- Kensi snipped out any evidence that proved her wrong then demanded that evidence again and again, only to snip it out again; she denied having written what she clearly wrote (after she snipped it out, of course); she k'lamed that I'd written things I clearly didn't (and she failed to back up her k'lames with proof); she stated that zoanthropy and transexualism aren't mental illnesses (they are listed in the DSM); that the psychiatric community is incorrect for listing them as such by taking an example from nearly 100 years ago (hysteria), long before modern psychiatry got a grasp on what exactly constitutes a mental illness; she stated that the CDC is promulgating "FUD" that's "been debunked in thousands of places" (yet provided no proof of this k'lamed "debunking"); she's been cornered into admitting her belief that gays have suffered "no harm" in living a lifestyle that's given 19% of them AIDS, causes the gay community to account for 63% of new AIDS cases per year (per the CDC) and kills thousands of them per year; she stated that liberalism is growing when it's actually in decline (and stated that conservatism is dying when it's actually growing and has a nearly 2:1 advantage over liberalism), and she had the audacity to try to use the same exact study from Gallup that I'd used to prove her wrong in the first place (proving she's kooking out so badly she's lost her reading comprehension abilities); she stated the Antarctic ice sheets are shrinking faster than ever when they're growing (to the tune of 49 Gt/yr, when considering that land ice is slowly growing and sea ice is rapidly expanding, per Nasa's ICESat); she stated that global temperature is rising when it's been falling for more than a decade per the UK Met and NASA, and accounting for the revelations that US climate researchers outright falsified the data to give the impression that a 90 year cooling trend was actually a warming trend; she k'lamed CO2 as the driver for global temperature change, then quoted a web page that says the exact opposite (the same web page, BTW, that I'd used to prove that CO2 lags temperature change, proving yet again her loss of reading comprehension)... then she *admitted* CO2 lags global temperature change, thereby being forced to agree with me (and reality); she then k'lamed CO2 as the driver for global temperature change *again*, but as yet has been unable to explain, given that CO2 levels were 5 times higher in the Ordovician and sun output was nearly the same (0.991 Ordovician, 1 today), why we're not in a perpetual ice age today; she presented examples of mass-shooting suspects that she k'lamed were conservative (but they turned out to be liberal, socialist or were the result of a liberal upbringing); she tried to state that Nazism was a conservative political party (it's a form of liberal fascism that takes many of its tenets directly from socialism); she failed to provide any proof of some of her kooky contentions while k'laming them as "proof"; she used a flawed and biased dating website poll and k'lamed that it trumped an actual scientific study (ironic, given that she's a scientist herself); she melted down so badly she lost her ability to do simple math; she attempted to k'lame Abraham Lincoln was a liberal (he admitted he was a conservative); she attempted to k'lame that every major civil rights advancement was solely due to liberals (when it was conservatives who've advanced the overwhelming majority of civil rights bills, to the strident opposition of the liberals), she k'lamed she knows who I am due to her "kookology experience", "profound psychological insight" and "cryptanalysis skills", yet she's thus far run from five challenges to out me, for 394 days and counting (ie: she doesn't dare provide any of her so-called "proof", for fear that she outs the fact that she's kooking out and seeing me everywhere), and her loss of reading comprehension skills resulted in her apparent loss of being able to determine chronology. As the level of spankage she was receiving escalated, the time between her posts grew, and the length of her posts grew shorter as she snipped out more and more evidence that she's a delusional kook... she's been beating a strategic retreat for months now.... when she's not attention-whoring for all the boys because her make-believe husband isn't paying enough attention to her fat, ugly, delusional ass anymore. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 21:17 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1m9kr35.7bdl2r16fqi8mN%snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk> |
| In reply to | #515829 |
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Fuck me, you're so \BORING.\ -- ^Ï^. Sn!pe <snipe@notforspam.fsnet.co.uk> My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 14:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.30428c919f7e1bcf98ac7c@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #515844 |
In article <1m9kr35.7bdl2r16fqi8mN%snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk>, snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk says... > > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> > wrote: > > > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Fuck me, you're so \BORING.\ Careful what you wish for. Fakey's gayer than a patch of pansies under a rainbow. -- Checkmate Official AUK Award Giver-Outer Copyright © 2015 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 22:58 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1m9kvpm.1a4yt7tnrvtr3N%snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk> |
| In reply to | #515887 |
Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: > In article <1m9kr35.7bdl2r16fqi8mN%snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk>, > snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk says... > > > > > > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> > > wrote: > > > > > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > > > Fuck me, you're so \BORING.\ > > Careful what you wish for. Fakey's gayer than a patch of pansies under > a rainbow. > Oh no, say it ain't so! It was only a turn of phrase, honest, your honour. Excuse me while I stand with my back to the wall. -- ^Ï^. Sn!pe <snipe@notforspam.fsnet.co.uk> My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 00:43 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <4b0a3ccda894e893a3c0da2bd32ce635@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #515887 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Jim "Jism Junkie Gerbil Cannon" Gorman (aka Chimpy the Coin-Slot
Operated SuckMonkey, aka Checkmate), in
<news:MPG.30428c919f7e1bcf98ac7c@news.altopia.com> did thusly jump
head first into the wood chipper again:
> In article <1m9kr35.7bdl2r16fqi8mN%snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk>,
> Tr!pe The Hypoxic ChickenFucker (aka Steve Hall)
> <snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk> squawked as he pulled it to
> poultry porn...
>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
>> wrote:
>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>> Fuck me, you're so \BORING.\
Translation:
"I'm far too stoooopid to understand any of this, so I'll snip it all
out before I bleat out my butthurt and run away. I'm going back to
fucking my chickens. At least I understand that... in, squawk, out.
In, squawk, out. In, squawk, out."
<snicker>
> Careful what you wish for. Fakey's gayer than a patch of pansies under
> a rainbow.
Projection from the poof who's steadfastly refused to refute or deny
his own faggoty words, as outlined in my .sig.
<snicker>
--
FNVWe:
"The Man Who Spanked Chimpy Checkmate The Cowardly CockSmoker Out Of
AUK, Then Out Of The Flonk, Then Into Insanity, Then Made Him Run Away
Like A Little Spankard Bitch. Again."
In which Checkmate admits to being a faggot and fantasizing about men:
MID: <feb093af883d0bf288e85863264900ed@dizum.com>
MID: <ab050c692202f7d955f7d2876fd39d56@dizum.com>
In which Checkmate says he wants to spank guys all night long:
MID: <k3m5ls$3pr$1@news.mixmin.net>
In which Checkmate confesses his desire to fuck who he claims is a
guy:
MID: <k3oolf$cpe$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k9nj0v$u4a$2@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <l8ogd6$1cd$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lclrtd$eei$4@news.mixmin.net>
In which Checkmate admits he'd definitely fuck a male dog:
MID: <k2h0j1$6ll$5@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k4dsc7$l32$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k5m8o5$vmq$5@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
In which Checkmate admits to having a golden showers fetish:
MID: <k79p80$9ps$3@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k8t9l0$nf0$5@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k8t9kv$nev$5@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k994eg$77l$1@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k9i8is$sna$3@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <lf3noh$sqv$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <76b587bf03232be29596c7a5e11f8eef@dizum.com>
MID: <d1590e1490afb94915166440ceb1190f@dizum.com>
MID: <4c614669bd9da0e2ab54c7a8618864f2@dizum.com>
In which Checkmate asks a guy for a blowjob (again):
MID: <ka4m1r$8rs$2@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <knd50p$7ni$2@news.albasani.net>
MID: <knnmme$3a4$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kp77db$rqk$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kvvjjb$a8t$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kvvjjb$a8u$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l069qt$g3j$9@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l1b6g1$qqv$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l65hh2$jpd$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l9b7ha$ret$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lfe72e$q0s$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lffimp$k2f$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <13de9e018d33aa5c02a89f8acfd8c2f8@dizum.com>
MID: <ddfe5035129d525fb2c441289a7b3c1b@dizum.com>
MID: <8352c247386df60552fec12941ad0c47@dizum.com>
MID: <863c1b2a4221005e6d5252e4b2f955b1@dizum.com>
MID: <9d7e6e672aa61c16813ade0f2815d0bf@dizum.com>
MID: <aacd887c22128680f39ec3ca7f7e1613@dizum.com>
MID: <372519cc110e5acf0d73268cb1a697e9@dizum.com>
Checkmate's got a thing about tickling guy's asses with random
objects:
MID: <l8rapt$rfm$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lfm4f8$3jb$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <li2ao1$3rf$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <37fb49820eaf36d0a45e91ce73d37d44@dizum.com>
MID: <13badb999438389ea8894228e51614a3@dizum.com>
MID: <2ce704d96dbf41ca89fd9eda221cb83c@dizum.com>
MID: <f9b10e223db85839d004420449391270@dizum.com>
MID: <184091e3de3a10096805606ec6dc5866@dizum.com>
MID: <ee740ba6bc409af0d2b4a66170b4e4d7@dizum.com>
MID: <d1d62217afbcbf98470365178072415a@dizum.com>
MID: <ac96244a69bc75dd3a60e8defda0b966@dizum.com>
MID: <9f02c35ef6d67ac06ee55f90199c3aaa@dizum.com>
MID: <3e4b3a8bb953839b7d2658130dcb927e@dizum.com>
MID: <9ec2ad3439122a906207c9f74c4a3a06@dizum.com>
MID: <761ef52f7fc54d46dd50e2692e160d92@dizum.com>
MID: <8ef71d83a5af476e6e275ea23b984323@dizum.com>
Checkmate's so gay he repeatedly insists that a picture of a vagina is
actually an asshole and balls... he went on and on about assholes and
balls... couldn't shut up about them... come to find out, he was just
trying to tell us that his lost love was actually a man:
MID: <l84jo7$cnd$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l84oip$icu$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l85ste$ao$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l87aud$saf$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l88ptv$nlj$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8dvdt$tj2$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8kl20$91i$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8psgt$m7d$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8rapv$rfm$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l98brg$6hp$6@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <ldg914$pel$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <31e4747ee7179064b1fdd5266cd08d72@dizum.com>
Chimpy the neurotic overwrought hysterical hissy-fit ninny escalates
his prescription drug abuse to "calm the fuck down" (Chimpy's words):
MID: <512f192b17a529cc6d490a55c43ac1be@dizum.com> - Oxy, Neurontin
MID: <kjucol$ckr$3@newsfeed.x-privat.org> - Oxy, Vicodin
MID: <kmqoip$cg3$8@news.albasani.net> - Norco
MID: <knc9l2$e66$2@news.albasani.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6lnn79.ppd.17.10@news.alt.net> - Oxycodone, Vicodin
MID: <6lo0dt.b7.17.4@news.alt.net> - Xanax
MID: <krt925$u63$3@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <6o9mv7.7ra.17.1@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6os03j.f3.19.2@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6p12vg.of8.19.2@news.alt.net> - Marijuana
MID: <6pg2lv.v27.17.2@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <kuqmlq$mi7$1@news.mixmin.net> - Amphetamine (!)
MID: <6qprvj.ndm.17.1@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6r26ti.ju0.19.2@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6stbk8.pbh.19.43@news.alt.net> - Ecstasy
MID: <l1b6g2$qr0$2@news.mixmin.net> - Vicodin
MID: <l5kd53$8kd$1@news.mixmin.net> - Norco
MID: <lanvc8$f06$2@news.mixmin.net> - Norco
MID: <larrim$lft$1@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <lcckii$mue$3@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <e7848d7ebc7f0b52e126bc35d82a65cf@dizum.com> - Hydrocodone,
Alprazolam
MID: <MPG.2eb9f496c779fc2998a54c@news.alt.net> - Percocet
Chimpy Checkmate's Famous Faggotisms:
=====================================
Chimpy's desperate plea to a dude:
MID: <5b690abba10d04da8f7675d278f2c2b8@dizum.com>
"Diddle me!"
MID: <07b50fac74279fabaf78a605899b7934@dizum.com>
"Trojans are a condiment."
Chimpy discusses his new boyfriend, Dave "SnuhWolf" Norris:
MID: <c565ada4723ca2e5cd1259cf8a1d86df@dizum.com>
"Snuhbaby makes a good cock warmer."
MID: <ffd2a514115a20cb3122e71b81907a1f@dizum.com>
"Pack your donut hole, any time, anywhere!"
Chimpy discussing the relative merits of 4 inches versus 10 inches:
MID: <b62ad5949e43f36901836bb59898426a@dizum.com>
"Plus, I suppose it doesn't hurt as much when they stuff it up your
butt."
MID: <MPG.2a5ec5516fc9605298b5ac@news.alt.net>
"Best you keester a kielbasa."
Message-ID: <kvvjjb$a8t$3@news.mixmin.net>
"Brag about it to my dick."
"My dick can't quite hear you, could you come a little closer?"
MID: <knnmmb$3a4$1@news.mixmin.net>
"If you see a dick, suck it."
MID: <6qft9a.g1f.19.1@news.alt.net>
"The Winchester 1892 would make a damned-good dildo."
MID: <l61jjg$tth$1@news.mixmin.net>
"Pump a rump."
MID: <l9d76m$k1v$4@news.mixmin.net>
"You gerbils are always in the dark."
MID: <lal84d$g2u$5@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <97bfaeca4f3abe27b5f6683e319cdb18@dizum.com>
"I gotta gay named Guido from Jersey"
MID: <lamgt8$b2d$1@news.mixmin.net>
"If they're soft, yer probably blowin' it all wrong."
MID: <lchub0$q96$5@news.mixmin.net>
"Hitler would have made a damned good Queen."
MID: <lcsgjb$obk$2@news.mixmin.net>
"Don't get slapped by the cocks you crave."
MID: <b068d280517a2d6c831d4a43f2cc8d31@dizum.com>
To a nearly toothless man:
"I wouldn't pay you to suck my dick if your last tooth fell out."
So Chimpy prefers paying *nearly* toothless men for blowjobs, but not
*fully* toothless men. LOL
MID: <afe97a65ff77e7382ad77cf18ea63e85@dizum.com>
"If I send you some money, will you suck Greg's dick?"
Chimpy likes to watch. LOL
MID: <9d7e6e672aa61c16813ade0f2815d0bf@dizum.com>
"Suck my clit."
Chimpy's proposition to a tranny sucking faggot who gets around being
gay by claiming tranny cocks are 'huge dangling clits'. LOL
=====================================
What a FAG!
Melt, Chimpy, melt.
Froth, Chimpy, froth.
Dance, Chimpy, dance!
<snicker>
/\ Properly known as Bill
\ /\ The Monster You Kooks Can't Handle
\ / \ THERE IS NO CABAL - LONG LIVE THE NEW CABAL
\/ The AUK coup is complete. The Old Cabal is no more.
Accept no substitutes...
if it's from Databasix, it's a sure bet it's from a kook.
databasix.com / PacketDerm, LLC / COTSE:
all branches of the same malignant tree.
Message-ID: <l7m8ig$1ld$7@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8jh$1le$8@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8lh$1le$9@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8ne$1ld$8@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8pc$1le$10@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8rb$1ld$9@news.mixmin.net>
--
---------------------------------------------
Tr!pe the Hypoxic ChickenFucker squawked, in
<news:1l9enri.1boemg21mhmo5lN%snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk>:
"If you want to know about bird sex, just ask me."
Steve Hall fucks birds. LOL
Slow bird sex... if Tr!pe chickenfucks fast, he turns blue. LOL
Too much chickenspooge clogging up his lungs. LOL
That's why he's too stupid to do simple math. Lack of oxygen. LOL
That also explains his rampant paranoia. Hypoxic brain damage. LOL
And his segue to human penis... birds aren't enough for him now. LOL
Maths Fail:
Message-ID: <07f2598e7078240cb9a4b25fa701c861@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <444e1cce007418ec5345daa93ec0ba38@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <1aefd4d212571584185eacda6e6750d8@dizum.com>
Paranoia Will Destroy Ya:
Message-ID: <6620b273ab1a048aaaff3acbf2583ca9@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <9db516a6a44943053aed3107df34af86@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <0793f311af986182080222026eab9325@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <6b28ba3566b3f36fa69ff1cb311d4d89@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <aa840a32fa3dc7050cc69f1dda0de7e3@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <938a2d9957c61a788fcbfd0f613aa92d@dizum.com>
Tr!pe The Penis Obsessed Poof:
Message-ID: <48bc243b312b3999403a6ab8b26ea0b0@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <0eb75ae7a93df2df718219c1ccd622a6@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <9a5d3b92c9841c7e71a07f484653a125@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <a4c326b191a39afe57a747dc51e7166b@dizum.com>
---------------------------------------------
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 00:16 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <a3580e0e19ab6b5b9f22f3f901b22f8d@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #515844 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Tr!pe the Hypoxic ChickenFucker, in <news:1m9kr35.7bdl2r16fqi8mN%snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk> squawked as he pulled it to poultry porn: > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> > wrote: >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > Fuck me, you're so \BORING.\ Translation: "I'm far too stoooopid to understand any of this, so I'll snip it all out before I bleat out my butthurt and run away. I'm going back to fucking my chickens. At least I understand that... in, squawk, out. In, squawk, out. In, squawk, out." <snicker> -- --------------------------------------------- Tr!pe the Hypoxic ChickenFucker squawked, in <news:1l9enri.1boemg21mhmo5lN%snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk>: "If you want to know about bird sex, just ask me." Steve Hall fucks birds. LOL Slow bird sex... if Tr!pe chickenfucks fast, he turns blue. LOL Too much chickenspooge clogging up his lungs. LOL That's why he's too stupid to do simple math. Lack of oxygen. LOL That also explains his rampant paranoia. Hypoxic brain damage. LOL And his segue to human penis... birds aren't enough for him now. LOL Maths Fail: Message-ID: <07f2598e7078240cb9a4b25fa701c861@dizum.com> Message-ID: <444e1cce007418ec5345daa93ec0ba38@dizum.com> Message-ID: <1aefd4d212571584185eacda6e6750d8@dizum.com> Paranoia Will Destroy Ya: Message-ID: <6620b273ab1a048aaaff3acbf2583ca9@dizum.com> Message-ID: <9db516a6a44943053aed3107df34af86@dizum.com> Message-ID: <0793f311af986182080222026eab9325@dizum.com> Message-ID: <6b28ba3566b3f36fa69ff1cb311d4d89@dizum.com> Message-ID: <aa840a32fa3dc7050cc69f1dda0de7e3@dizum.com> Message-ID: <938a2d9957c61a788fcbfd0f613aa92d@dizum.com> Tr!pe The Penis Obsessed Poof: Message-ID: <48bc243b312b3999403a6ab8b26ea0b0@dizum.com> Message-ID: <0eb75ae7a93df2df718219c1ccd622a6@dizum.com> Message-ID: <9a5d3b92c9841c7e71a07f484653a125@dizum.com> Message-ID: <a4c326b191a39afe57a747dc51e7166b@dizum.com> ---------------------------------------------
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web