Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.astronomy > #273253
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| References | (2 earlier) <Z42dnYBDLuuBzUvInZ2dnUU7-I-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <5a352b9031e6f44a2e07d0dc0ddefb82@dizum.com> <M46dnWXB9aGsu0rInZ2dnUU7-b-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <9bf9474906ace8bf4e47580538b17f73@dizum.com> <49453545-f8f7-4572-a9e1-6f59184546f9@googlegroups.com> |
| Subject | Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit |
| Message-ID | <8984d1acd016d3d29cd61ce752502780@dizum.com> (permalink) |
| Date | 2015-08-22 06:05 +0200 |
| Newsgroups | alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics |
| Organization | dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> joeturn2@yahoo.com, in <news:49453545-f8f7-4572-a9e1-6f59184546f9@googlegroups.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Friday, August 21, 2015 at 2:55:54 PM UTC-4, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >> >> Rocky, in <news:M46dnWXB9aGsu0rInZ2dnUU7-b-dnZ2d@giganews.com> >> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> >>> wrote in message > >>>> The disconnected call was the first call Barbara Olson attempted >>>> to make, via her cell phone, you fucking frothmonkey. Cell phones >>>> tend to get disconnected, as quickly as they hop from cell site >>>> to cell site as the plane moves. The remaining calls were from >>>> the AirPhone, via the operator, billed collect because Barbara >>>> Olson didn't have access to her purse and credit cards (which is >>>> why she called the operator, she didn't have a credit card to pay >>>> for the calls via the AirPhone)... she and everyone else had been >>>> herded to the back of the plane. >>> Hey<SMACKAKOOK!> >> Delusional psychotic fuckwits who blather stupidity will have >> their stupid slobbering gobs smacked shut each time they spew >> their stupidity, Delusional Psychotic Fuckwit. >> >> <http://www.911myths.com/index.php/American_Airlines_Flight_77_Calls> >> >> The FBI didn't say Barbara Olson didn't speak to Ted Olson, you >> retarded fuckwit. >> >> They said, and I quote: "57. The records available for the phone >> calls from American 77 do not allow for a determination of which >> of four 'connected calls to unknown numbers' represent the two >> between Barbara and Ted Olson, although the FBI and DOJ believe >> that all four represent communications between Barbara Olson and >> her husband's office (all family members of the Flight 77 >> passengers and crew were canvassed to see if they had received >> any phone calls from the hijacked flight, and only Renee May's >> parents and Ted Olson indicated that they had received such >> calls). The four calls were at 9:15:34 for 1 minute, 42 seconds; >> 9:20:15 for 4 minutes, 34 seconds; 9:25:48 for 2 minutes, 34 >> seconds; and 9:30:56 for 4 minutes, 20 seconds. FBI >> report,"American Airlines Airphone Usage," Sept. 20, 2001; FBI >> report of investigation, interview of Theodore Olson, Sept. 11, >> 2001; FBI report of investigation, interview of Helen Voss, Sept. >> 14, 2001; AAL response to the Commission's supplemental document >> request, Jan. 20, 2004. Footnote 57 to Chapter 1, 9/11 Commission >> Report" >> >> Notice the text blurb "the FBI and DOJ believe that all four >> represent communications between Barbara Olson and her husband's >> office", you fucking delusional little monkey. >> >> The FBI said exactly the *opposite* of what you're claiming. But >> of course, you've never actually *read* the FBI report, have you? >> You retard. >> >> The FBI said they weren't sure which call belonged to whom >> because the call was an operator-assisted collect call and thus >> didn't have proper tracking from the AirPhone system, given that >> AirPhones were serviced by AT&T Wireless' Aviation Division >> (ClairCom), and AT&T doesn't bill itself. Verizon serviced >> airplane phones for TWA (now a part of American), United, >> Continental, US Airways and most Delta flights, but AT&T had >> American flights. >> >> The phone records of Ted Olson's office prove you're not only >> wrong, you're not only delusional, but you're retarded, as well. >> The witnesses, including the AT&T operators (plural, there was >> more than one phone call from the plane's AirPhone from Barbara >> Olson to Ted Olson), Ted Olson's secretary and Ted Olson himself. >> >> Barbara Olson desperately asked Ted Olson what she should tell >> the pilot to do, not because she could call the pilot on his >> phone, but because the pilot was standing in the back of the >> plane with the passengers. The fucking plane had been hijacked, >> the terrorists were flying the plane. You idiot. >> >> But your broken brain seems to think that everything must be a >> conspiracy. Occam's Razor makes no sense to you... because you're >> retarded. >> >> Kook. LOL >>> Rocky >> Now, get to addressing the 15 ways your kook conspiracy theory >> violates the laws of physics: >> >> ====================================================== >> 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of >> collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep >> below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to >> drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact >> that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal >> *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 >> miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole >> *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why >> the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. >> >> 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the video *you* provided wasn't an >> EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd >> been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond >> time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) >> would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount >> of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That >> there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no >> nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have >> destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. >> >> 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that >> there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. >> If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have >> shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was most >> likely the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement >> weapon sights that was the source. You didn't specify what type >> of radiation was experienced, and I doubt you're smart or >> educated enough to even know what types of radiation there are. >> >> 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex >> or anywhere in NYC. They found tritium from the aircraft exit >> signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial >> sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for >> all other sources of radiation. >> >> 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be >> sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by >> people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you >> k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the >> order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame >> the bombs were buried. >> >> 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron >> source. It naturally decays over time, and its decay byproducts, >> the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, >> include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon >> poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger >> being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start >> any sort of nuclear chain reaction. >> >> 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* >> *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling >> vertical support column and *NO* EMP: >> ====================== >> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> >> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column >> buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No >> amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. >> ====================== >> >> 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going >> to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would >> be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the >> temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? >> >> 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through >> a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into >> surrounding rock. >> >> 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic >> taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of >> satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were >> detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill >> effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or >> aircraft. >> >> 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel sent down to >> service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source >> triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic >> basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire base at >> 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology >> to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 >> blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area >> the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced >> to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched >> for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to >> survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? >> >> 12) You admitted (ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com) >> that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers >> (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked >> off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your >> admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of >> the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" >> (your words)? >> >> 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic >> signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the >> WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? >> >> 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris >> kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep >> underground, Ko0K? >> >> 15) Explain how these 19 nukes could tunnel holes from their >> underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep, to directly >> under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid >> bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers >> (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations >> and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion >> started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on >> The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). >> ====================================================== >> >> There's now 15 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws >> of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, >> point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who >> can't grasp simple physics. >> >> Kook. LOL > THERE ARE NO NUCLEAR BOMBS > This was a fairy tail "tail" LOL > created to give purpose to get into the war.The Govenment "Govenment" LOL > stooge Instien "Instien" LOL > creatd "creatd" LOL > a farse "farse" LOL > to keep scientist Only one? LOL > from releasing free energy to the herd.His E=MCsquared balony caused scientist Only one? LOL > to steer away from energy and put forth the effort to build a bomb to stop all > wars.But after years of failure Roosevelt said if you cant "cant" LOL > make it fake it and Hiroshima/Nagasaki were used to fulfil Given that you're USian, "fulfil" LOL > the idiotsy. "idiotsy" says the idiocy spewing idiot. LOL! > They put on a show to make people then believe in witch craft.Niether "Niether" LOL > city was exposed to nuclear It's spelled "nucular", George. LOL > fall out,because it was an impossibility.No radiation burns at all. No, none at all... the word Hibakusha was made up out of thin air. LOL <http://www.hiroshima-remembered.com/photos/effects/images/WE10.jpg> <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e9/The_patient%27s_skin_is_burned_in_a_pattern_corresponding_to_the_dark_portions_of_a_kimono_-_NARA_-_519686.jpg> <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a9/Sumiteru_Taniguchi_back.jpg> <https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/ae/09/75/ae09750a9835b914af1453adef97d28e.jpg> <http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/6312/218/1600/radiation%20burns.jpg> <http://beatles.ncf.ca/young_boy_disfigured.jpg> Yeah, those hundreds of thousands of people, some of whom received such severe radiation burns that they died immediately... they were all "crisis actors" saying their scripted lines so George Bush could start a war in Japan... or some such libtard kook blather... right? LOL > Just to show you how stupid and gulible "gulible" LOL You forgot to misspell "stupid". Usually those who are claiming others are stupid misspell it "stupdid" or similar so others know how very intelligent they are. LOL > the herd is they still to this day believe,that the letter j > is over 500 years old. What's that got to do with nuclear weapons? Did Yeshua drop a nuke on somebody? LOL > Example jesus was spelled iesous 600 years ago Wrong. The original Hebrew was Yeshua, transliterated directly into English as "Joshua". "Iesous" is the Greek transliteration of the Hebrew name. The English spelling (due to Gian Giorgio Trissino distinguishing the 'i' and 'j' sounds in the Italian language in 1524, from which the English language inherited the 'j' sound) of the Greek transliteration of the Hebrew name is "Jesus". So our "Jesus" is the transliteration of a transliteration. Today, he'd be known as "Josh". LOL Greeks and Romans hated the Jews, and so tried to extinguish the name Yeshua from their records, replacing it with Iesous (or "Hail Zeus") as an attempt at co-opting Christianity and steering it back toward their ancient mythological gods. That we somehow picked up the name from the Greeks instead of a direct Hebrew transliteration is an accident of history, nothing more. Did you think human mouths incapable of producing the 'j' sound prior to 600 years ago, Ko0k? Or is the Occam's Razor explanation that written languages back then didn't distinguish between the 'i' and 'j' sound due to limitations in the written languages the more likely explanation? I mean, that *would* explain Gian Giorgio Trissino's treatise on the 'i' and 'j' sounds in the written Italian language, after all. And what's that got to do with nuclear weapons? LOL > and it means borned "borned" LOL > of Isis and Zues. "Zues" LOL Wrong. The Hebrew Yeshua means "The Lord is Salvation", Ko0k. Literally translated from Greek, Iesous means "Hail Zeus". Iesous has no meaning in Hebrew, as it's not a Hebrew word, Ko0k. LOL Are you saying you believe in the Greek mythological figures? Athena (goddess of wisdom) must have hated you, for some reason. LOL > GO FIGURE Wow... just. wow. A poorly spelled Gargle Gropes post from a tard currently welfare-mooching in a rented shitshack in Kissimmee, Florida somehow out-kooks the broken-brained Rocky. This country is doomed because of stupid fuckwits like you. Please die. Quickly. Preferably in a way in which disposal of your brainless carcass isn't required. The only good thing is that smart people can make a fortune off idiotic sheeple like you. You wonder why the gap between the rich and the poor is widening? It's because the gap between the intelligent and the dumbasses is widening. Say, I've got a book for sale that tells the absolute truth about what happened on 9/11. It includes everything down to the most minute detail, with photographs, secret emails, and a CD of supplementary evidence including audio... and *proves* that Bush did it. It's on sale in Borders book stores nationwide for the low, low price of $499.95. Get yours today! <snickers at retards searching for Borders bookstore locations> I've also got a video, for those mouth-breathers who never felt it necessary to learn how to read. At 6 hours, it only contains a subset of the evidence in the book, but also includes evidence not found in the book... if you want the full story, you'll have to buy the video and the book. You can purchase the video at Borders for the same $499.95 (if you hurry and buy it today, I'll cut that price by $100!), or you can rent it at Blockbuster Video for the incredibly low price of $125.95. They're both titled "Bush Done It! I Gots Prufe!". Go get yours today! <snickers at retards searching for Blockbuster locations> -- Rocky, your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the video *you* *provided* between the video disturbance due to satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (depending upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission... and since we're talking solid bedrock here, it'd be at the upper end of that scale). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain is now saying there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you know there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble or its vicinity. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" on the video *you* *provided* and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So you've proven by skirting the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality. And the harder you try, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-20 10:08 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-20 19:57 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-20 17:09 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 05:10 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 08:24 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 20:53 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 17:01 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 17:12 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 09:58 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 08:15 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 10:23 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-22 16:47 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:45 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 08:10 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 11:27 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-22 17:38 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 16:49 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-22 17:51 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 23:29 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:28 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:16 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 09:11 +0100
2 T-Annoy find your own evidence (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 05:51 -0500
Re: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 12:15 +0100
Re: 2 T-Annoy proves he is an asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:26 -0500
Re: 2 T-Annoy proves he is an asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:38 -0500
Re: 2 T-Annoy proves he is an asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:40 -0500
Re: 2 T-Annoy proves he is an asshole (was find your own evidence) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 17:45 +0100
T-Annoy proves he is still an asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 11:59 -0500
Re: T-Annoy proves he is still an asshole (was find your own evidence) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 18:19 +0100
T-Annoy proves he is still a big asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 12:45 -0500
Jim proves he can't see people impeach themselves "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:29 -0500
Re: Jim proves he can't see people impeach themselves je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:31 -0700
Re: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:47 -0500
Caught Kent in a BIG LIE (was: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit)) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:14 -0500
Re: Caught Kent in a BIG LIE (was: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 15:00 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:46 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:50 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 21:07 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-22 15:11 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 22:57 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-22 21:17 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-22 14:42 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-22 22:58 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 00:43 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 00:16 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 06:05 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 16:12 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 01:16 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-20 17:35 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 05:37 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 08:41 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 06:55 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-21 07:40 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 16:34 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 14:45 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 16:52 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-21 22:53 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-22 08:42 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 09:20 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 09:53 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:16 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 11:13 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-22 18:02 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 17:12 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-21 21:36 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 20:17 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:59 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 19:07 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-23 09:07 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 06:08 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 21:22 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-22 21:31 -0700
Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut: (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 10:43 -0500
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut: Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 19:38 +0200
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:08 -0500
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 21:47 +0200
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 12:59 -0700
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut: (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 11:38 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:19 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 16:10 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 10:43 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 06:27 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 12:59 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:02 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 15:39 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 14:05 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:10 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-27 18:17 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 06:31 +0200
Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-28 13:54 -0400
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 04:42 +0200
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 04:09 +0000
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 18:12 +0200
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 03:17 -0400
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 03:16 -0400
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 17:17 +0200
csiph-web