Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.astronomy > #273163

Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit

From Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
References <C7ydnYCKlO0ocEjInZ2dnUU7-R-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <65002bc896720800888a3c3ecc6b84d3@dizum.com> <ta6dnXyqSLfEy0vInZ2dnUU7-f2dnZ2d@giganews.com>
Subject Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit
Message-ID <bc1a813a8befe2a041a11d945f997760@dizum.com> (permalink)
Date 2015-08-21 05:37 +0200
Newsgroups alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics
Organization dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Rocky, in <news:ta6dnXyqSLfEy0vInZ2dnUU7-f2dnZ2d@giganews.com> 
did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> 
> wrote in message news:65002bc896720800888a3c3ecc6b84d3@dizum.com...

>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Rocky, in <news:C7ydnYCKlO0ocEjInZ2dnUU7-R-dnZ2d@giganews.com>
>> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

>>> "Th<SMACKAKOOK!>

>> You fucking moron, you keep going deeper and deeper down the
>> rabbit hole of insanity, listening to kooks who are just as or
>> more retarded than you are.
>>
>> <http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Barbara_Olson_calls>
>>
>> Barbara Olson called the operator and asked to be put through to
>> Ted Olson's office, the secretary answered and transferred the
>> call to him. The phone records on the website above proves it,
>> you fucking retard.

> A<SMACKAKOOK!>

You will continue to be minimized, laughed at and dismissed as 
the broken-brained little kook that you are until you are able to 
explain how your kooky little scenario can violate several laws 
of physics.

"Time is not tracked because OSPS bills" means Barbara Olson 
called the live operator, you brainless dimwit. The call was then 
handed off to the AT&T operator and the domain of the call 
changed to OSPS (Operator Services Position Station).

The 102 second collect call, initially internally billed to the 
AT&T operator, wasn't time-tracked because AT&T doesn't fucking 
bill itself.

Ted Olson's secretary said in her testimony that the longest call 
received had been a collect call, which would have been billed to 
Ted Olson's office. The reason she made a collect call is because 
her first call, via her cell phone, was almost immediately 
disconnected... as cell phone calls from planes usually are. So 
Barbara Olson tried the AirPhone on the plane, didn't have access 
to her purse because everyone had been herded to the back of the 
plane and thus couldn't make a credit card call, so she called 
the operator and asked to make a collect call to Ted Olson's 
office.

The secretary answered, and patched Barbara Olson through to Ted 
Olson. They talked until they were disconnected (as also often 
happened with AirPhones), then she tried again.

Kook. LOL

> Rocky

Now, get to addressing the 15 ways your kook conspiracy theory 
violates the laws of physics:

======================================================
1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of 
collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep 
below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to 
drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact 
that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal 
*melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 
miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole 
*ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why 
the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep.

2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the video *you* provided wasn't an 
EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd 
been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond 
time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) 
would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount 
of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That 
there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no 
nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have 
destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius.

3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that 
there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. 
If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have 
shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was most 
likely the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement 
weapon sights that was the source. You didn't specify what type 
of radiation was experienced, and I doubt you're smart or 
educated enough to even know what types of radiation there are.

4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex 
or anywhere in NYC. They found tritium from the aircraft exit 
signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial 
sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for 
all other sources of radiation.

5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be 
sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by 
people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you 
k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the 
order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame 
the bombs were buried.

6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron 
source. It naturally decays over time, and its decay byproducts, 
the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, 
include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon 
poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger 
being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start 
any sort of nuclear chain reaction.

7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* 
*it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling 
vertical support column and *NO* EMP:
======================
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo>
You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column 
buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No 
amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP.
======================

8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going 
to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would 
be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the 
temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K?

9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through 
a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into 
surrounding rock.

10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic 
taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 satellite 
uplink disruptions in the video *you* provided) were detonated at 
the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were 
experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft.

11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel sent down to 
service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source 
triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic 
basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire base at 
37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology 
to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 
blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area 
the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced 
to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched 
for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to 
survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat?

12) You admitted (ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com) 
that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers 
(all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked 
off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your 
admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of 
the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" 
(your words)?

13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic 
signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the 
WTC site on 11 Sep 2001?

14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris 
kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep 
underground, Ko0K?

15) Explain how these 19 nukes could tunnel holes from their 
underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep, to directly 
under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid 
bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers 
(which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations 
and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion 
started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on 
The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.).
======================================================

There's now 15 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws 
of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, 
point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who 
can't grasp simple physics.

Kook. LOL

-- 

Rocky, your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid 
admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and 
more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly 
demolishes your kook theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of 
illogic.

For instance:
=============================
A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the video 
*you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you 
they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a 
simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the 
nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 
years.

B) Your timing on the video *you* *provided* between the video 
disturbance due to satellite uplink interference (what you deemed 
to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it 
was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your 
supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 
*miles* below the surface (depending upon soil composition and 
thus speed of compressive blast transmission... and since we're 
talking solid bedrock here, it'd be at the upper end of that 
scale). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill 
that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to 
yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least 
try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a 
shallow hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, 
now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, covered it up, walked 
away for 33 years".

C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require 
periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which 
naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay 
byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon 
poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to 
service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means 
your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow 
hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an 
impossibly deep hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", 
to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, 
complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the 
explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were 
maintained" (your words).

D) Your broken brain is now saying there were 19 nukes instead of 
your original 3, because you know there were 19 instances of 
satellite uplink interference in the video *you* *provided*, in 
which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink 
interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, 
they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there 
were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely 
ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the 
city into darkness due to EMP, and completely ignoring the fact 
that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble or 
its vicinity.

E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were 
buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, 
which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to 
demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so 
your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could 
somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just 
below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their 
cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain 
said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* 
in *12* *seconds*. LOL

F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs 
your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up 
to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they 
didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd 
be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), 
that leads right back to your calculation of the time between 
your claimed "EMP" on the video *you* *provided* and the time the 
buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So you've 
proven by skirting the perimeter of sanity full-circle that 
you're insane. LOL

IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from 
reality. And the harder you try, the more you run around in 
little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing 
your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into 
a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even 
started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet.
=============================

Kook. LOL

Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-20 10:08 -0500
  Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-20 19:57 +0200
    Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-20 17:09 -0500
      Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 05:10 +0200
        Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 08:24 -0500
          Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 20:53 +0200
            Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 17:01 -0500
              Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 17:12 -0700
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 09:58 -0500
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 08:15 -0700
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 10:23 -0500
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-22 16:47 +0100
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:45 -0700
              Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 08:10 +0200
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 11:27 -0500
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-22 17:38 +0100
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 16:49 +0000
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-22 17:51 -0400
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 23:29 +0000
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:28 -0500
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:16 +0000
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 09:11 +0100
                2 T-Annoy find your own evidence (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 05:51 -0500
                Re: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 12:15 +0100
                Re: 2 T-Annoy proves he is an asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:26 -0500
                Re: 2 T-Annoy proves he is an asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:38 -0500
                Re: 2 T-Annoy proves he is an asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:40 -0500
                Re: 2 T-Annoy proves he is an asshole (was find your own evidence) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 17:45 +0100
                T-Annoy proves he is still an asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 11:59 -0500
                Re: T-Annoy proves he is still an asshole (was find your own evidence) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 18:19 +0100
                T-Annoy proves he is still a big asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 12:45 -0500
                Jim proves he can't see people impeach themselves  "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:29 -0500
                Re: Jim proves he can't see people impeach themselves je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:31 -0700
                Re: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:47 -0500
                Caught Kent in a BIG LIE (was: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit)) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:14 -0500
                Re: Caught Kent in a BIG LIE (was: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 15:00 +0100
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:46 -0500
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:50 -0500
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 21:07 +0200
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-22 15:11 -0400
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 22:57 +0200
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-22 21:17 +0100
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-22 14:42 -0700
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-22 22:58 +0100
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 00:43 +0200
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 00:16 +0200
            Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 06:05 +0200
          Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 16:12 -0500
            Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 01:16 -0500
    Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-20 17:35 -0500
      Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 05:37 +0200
        Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 08:41 -0500
          Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 06:55 -0700
            Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-21 07:40 -0700
              Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 16:34 -0500
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 14:45 -0700
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 16:52 -0500
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-21 22:53 +0000
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-22 08:42 -0400
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 09:20 -0500
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 09:53 -0500
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:16 -0500
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 11:13 -0500
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-22 18:02 +0100
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 17:12 -0700
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-21 21:36 -0700
          Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 20:17 +0200
            Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:59 -0500
              Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 19:07 -0700
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-23 09:07 +0100
              Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 06:08 +0200
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 21:22 -0700
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-22 21:31 -0700
                Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut:  (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 10:43 -0500
                Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut: Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 19:38 +0200
                Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:08 -0500
                Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 21:47 +0200
                Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 12:59 -0700
                Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut:  (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 11:38 -0700
              Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:19 +0000
          Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 16:10 -0500
            Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 10:43 -0500
              Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 06:27 -0500
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 12:59 -0500
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:02 -0400
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 15:39 -0500
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 14:05 -0700
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:10 +0000
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-27 18:17 -0400
                Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 06:31 +0200
                Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-28 13:54 -0400
                Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 04:42 +0200
                Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 04:09 +0000
                Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 18:12 +0200
                Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 03:17 -0400
                Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 03:16 -0400
                Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 17:17 +0200

csiph-web