Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #710979 > unrolled thread
| Started by | yporat08@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-11-02 00:37 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-11-10 11:28 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 61 — 7 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-02 00:37 -0700
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-02 07:19 -0700
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 15:46 +0000
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-02 09:53 -0700
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 17:33 +0000
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-02 12:01 -0700
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 22:38 +0000
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-02 17:12 -0700
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-02 22:08 -0700
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 13:28 +0000
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-03 07:30 -0700
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 14:43 +0000
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-03 11:07 -0700
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 18:09 +0000
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 18:45 +0000
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-05 02:59 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Rick Jones <RJones1993@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 06:17 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-03 08:00 -0700
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! "I. Seymour Butts" <invalid@example.com> - 2018-11-03 13:26 -0700
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-10 23:56 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-11 20:51 +0000
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-11 16:50 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-12 03:44 +0000
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-11 21:12 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-12 12:53 +0000
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-12 07:56 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-12 08:34 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-12 10:00 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-12 18:40 +0000
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-12 11:52 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-12 20:04 +0000
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-12 16:41 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-13 01:07 +0000
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-12 22:27 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-12 22:37 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-13 01:16 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-13 12:35 +0000
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-13 06:45 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-13 16:36 +0000
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-13 08:58 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-14 01:31 +0000
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-13 23:19 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-12 18:40 +0000
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 19:19 -0700
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-03 22:33 -0700
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-04 08:42 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-11-05 14:13 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-05 16:39 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 14:56 +0000
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-10 23:40 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-11 20:51 +0000
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-11-03 11:49 -0700
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 17:36 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-06 02:57 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 17:56 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-10 01:32 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-10 01:37 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-10 01:43 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-10 04:57 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 10:21 -0800
Re: NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-10 11:28 -0800
Page 1 of 4 [1] 2 3 4 Next page →
| From | yporat08@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-02 00:37 -0700 |
| Subject | NO CURVATURE AND NO ' ' SCHMERVATURE ' OF SPACE !! |
| Message-ID | <1806fe7d-04fa-4ab9-9f28-d8732ea21c90@googlegroups.com> |
There is no curvature and no 'schmervature ' of space !!! space is nothing!! and has no physical/Dimensions / properties except length dimension -- --that by itself cannot be detected if no mass in it !!! for me Mass is the main ''hero ' of all physics I was dwelling on it here along many years ! that does not to say that I AM not A GREAT ADMIRER OF EINSTEIN !! FOR his E=mc^2 for his photoelectric findings and his SR!! that is as well right !!!! =================================== but Einstein was only a human being not an Angle from heaven and 'Hominum -errata est'' (spell ??in Roman ====== now if!! he was wrong about 'curved space' just imagine!! the damage it was causing along more than 100 years !! by preventing / ''screening'' some other real needed advance !! NO ONE EVER USED IT FOR ANYTHING not to speak about PRACTICAL USES even NASSA by its interstellar projects (to send a human being to Mars!!! does no use it!! except the ordinary Newtonian physics !! now what on earth another ** responsible project** we have other than sending a human being to mars ??? 2 my alternative claim is that even fantastical it looks in our days that ============================================= Mass** IS THE CREAEOR OF **ALL**!! FORCES ---INCLUDING GRAVITY !!! =========================================== the Faraday ingenious experiment with the permanent magnet 100yesre ago !!! was the first TABGIBLE clue to it !! unprecedented !! ==================================== TIA (humbly ) Eng Yehiel Porat 2/11/2018 ======================
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | yporat08@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-02 07:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <22d46797-5dcc-489d-acd8-72c52ba77506@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #710979 |
On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 9:37:40 AM UTC+2, ypor...@gmail.com wrote: > There is no curvature and no 'schmervature ' of space !!! > > space is nothing!! > and has no physical/Dimensions / properties > except length dimension -- > --that by itself cannot be detected > if no mass in it !!! > for me > Mass is the main ''hero ' of all physics > I was dwelling on it here along many years ! > > that does not to say that > I AM not A GREAT ADMIRER OF EINSTEIN !! > FOR > his > E=mc^2 > > for his photoelectric findings > and his SR!! > that is as well right !!!! > > =================================== > but > Einstein was only a human being > not an Angle from heaven > and > 'Hominum -errata est'' (spell ??in Roman > ====== > now > if!! he was wrong about 'curved space' > just imagine!! the damage it was causing > along more than 100 years !! > by preventing / ''screening'' some > other real > needed advance !! > > NO ONE EVER USED IT FOR ANYTHING > > not to speak about PRACTICAL USES > even NASSA by its interstellar projects > (to send a human being to Mars!!! > does no use it!! > except > the ordinary Newtonian physics !! > now > what on earth another ** responsible project** we have > other than sending a human being to mars ??? > 2 > my alternative claim is that > even fantastical it looks in our days > that > ============================================= > Mass** IS THE CREAEOR OF **ALL**!! FORCES ---INCLUDING GRAVITY !!! > =========================================== > the Faraday ingenious experiment with the permanent magnet 100yesre ago !!! > was the first TABGIBLE clue to it !! > > unprecedented !! > > ==================================== > TIA (humbly ) > Eng > Yehiel Porat > 2/11/2018 > ====================== now odd Bodkin (anonymous)!! wanted to cheat us by saying that: GPS is using 'curved space' physics so what do you think about it ? TIA Y.Porat ====================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-02 15:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <prhrfr$n2e$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #710989 |
<yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 9:37:40 AM UTC+2, ypor...@gmail.com wrote: >> There is no curvature and no 'schmervature ' of space !!! >> >> space is nothing!! >> and has no physical/Dimensions / properties >> except length dimension -- >> --that by itself cannot be detected >> if no mass in it !!! >> for me >> Mass is the main ''hero ' of all physics >> I was dwelling on it here along many years ! >> >> that does not to say that >> I AM not A GREAT ADMIRER OF EINSTEIN !! >> FOR >> his >> E=mc^2 >> >> for his photoelectric findings >> and his SR!! >> that is as well right !!!! >> >> =================================== >> but >> Einstein was only a human being >> not an Angle from heaven >> and >> 'Hominum -errata est'' (spell ??in Roman >> ====== >> now >> if!! he was wrong about 'curved space' >> just imagine!! the damage it was causing >> along more than 100 years !! >> by preventing / ''screening'' some >> other real >> needed advance !! >> >> NO ONE EVER USED IT FOR ANYTHING >> >> not to speak about PRACTICAL USES >> even NASSA by its interstellar projects >> (to send a human being to Mars!!! >> does no use it!! >> except >> the ordinary Newtonian physics !! >> now >> what on earth another ** responsible project** we have >> other than sending a human being to mars ??? >> 2 >> my alternative claim is that >> even fantastical it looks in our days >> that >> ============================================= >> Mass** IS THE CREAEOR OF **ALL**!! FORCES ---INCLUDING GRAVITY !!! >> =========================================== >> the Faraday ingenious experiment with the permanent magnet 100yesre ago !!! >> was the first TABGIBLE clue to it !! >> >> unprecedented !! >> >> ==================================== >> TIA (humbly ) >> Eng >> Yehiel Porat >> 2/11/2018 >> ====================== > now > > odd Bodkin (anonymous)!! > wanted to cheat us > by saying that: > > GPS is using 'curved space' physics > > so what do you think about it ? > > TIA > Y.Porat > > ==================== > I somehow knew you were incapable of doing a simple Google search, and that your ONLY recourse is to ask people here for help. Doesn’t this embarrass you a little? http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast162/Unit5/gps.html -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | yporat08@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-02 09:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4468b20a-3af5-4770-aefb-25d194075468@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #710997 |
On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 5:46:08 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: > <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 9:37:40 AM UTC+2, ypor...@gmail.com wrote: > >> There is no curvature and no 'schmervature ' of space !!! > >> > >> space is nothing!! > >> and has no physical/Dimensions / properties > >> except length dimension -- > >> --that by itself cannot be detected > >> if no mass in it !!! > >> for me > >> Mass is the main ''hero ' of all physics > >> I was dwelling on it here along many years ! > >> > >> that does not to say that > >> I AM not A GREAT ADMIRER OF EINSTEIN !! > >> FOR > >> his > >> E=mc^2 > >> > >> for his photoelectric findings > >> and his SR!! > >> that is as well right !!!! > >> > >> =================================== > >> but > >> Einstein was only a human being > >> not an Angle from heaven > >> and > >> 'Hominum -errata est'' (spell ??in Roman > >> ====== > >> now > >> if!! he was wrong about 'curved space' > >> just imagine!! the damage it was causing > >> along more than 100 years !! > >> by preventing / ''screening'' some > >> other real > >> needed advance !! > >> > >> NO ONE EVER USED IT FOR ANYTHING > >> > >> not to speak about PRACTICAL USES > >> even NASSA by its interstellar projects > >> (to send a human being to Mars!!! > >> does no use it!! > >> except > >> the ordinary Newtonian physics !! > >> now > >> what on earth another ** responsible project** we have > >> other than sending a human being to mars ??? > >> 2 > >> my alternative claim is that > >> even fantastical it looks in our days > >> that > >> ============================================= > >> Mass** IS THE CREAEOR OF **ALL**!! FORCES ---INCLUDING GRAVITY !!! > >> =========================================== > >> the Faraday ingenious experiment with the permanent magnet 100yesre ago !!! > >> was the first TABGIBLE clue to it !! > >> > >> unprecedented !! > >> > >> ==================================== > >> TIA (humbly ) > >> Eng > >> Yehiel Porat > >> 2/11/2018 > >> ====================== > > now > > > > odd Bodkin (anonymous)!! > > wanted to cheat us > > by saying that: > > > > GPS is using 'curved space' physics > > > > so what do you think about it ? > > > > TIA > > Y.Porat > > > > ==================== > > > > I somehow knew you were incapable of doing a simple Google search, and that > your ONLY recourse is to ask people here for help. Doesn’t this embarrass > you a little? > http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast162/Unit5/gps.html > > > -- > Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables ========================= thank you Bodkin indeed you are better than me in searching the net now please note the GPS system is based on a **thick net**of satellites SURROUND ALL OUR GLOBE !! if space is curved why do we need ALL THAT THICK NET OF SATTELITES !! IF SPACE WAS CURVEED THE EM WAVES WOULD FOOW THE SATTELITES EVEN IF NOT 'SISED BY SIDE !! but run around ''curved space' that is; actualy not space but just our globe that is curved !~~ globe that is curved !!!with no need of all that side by side net probably with relative short distance straight lines !! em waves do not move in curved lines ?!! they move in straight lines and therefore there is the need of an eye to eye system !! not because curved space !! but curved globe 2 I indicated that even according to my understanding SR is right !!! so SR calculations are needed !! and i understand it but not Gr calculations we have to find out if they use GR calculations or may be just SR calculations and it is their mistake to mix Sr with GR ?? we have to ask the real people who did it 'with their hands'' and not from ones that just'' heard' about it and were mixing Sr with GR!?? ================== TIA Y.P ==============
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-02 17:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pri1op$12fu$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #711004 |
<yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 5:46:08 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 9:37:40 AM UTC+2, ypor...@gmail.com wrote: >>>> There is no curvature and no 'schmervature ' of space !!! >>>> >>>> space is nothing!! >>>> and has no physical/Dimensions / properties >>>> except length dimension -- >>>> --that by itself cannot be detected >>>> if no mass in it !!! >>>> for me >>>> Mass is the main ''hero ' of all physics >>>> I was dwelling on it here along many years ! >>>> >>>> that does not to say that >>>> I AM not A GREAT ADMIRER OF EINSTEIN !! >>>> FOR >>>> his >>>> E=mc^2 >>>> >>>> for his photoelectric findings >>>> and his SR!! >>>> that is as well right !!!! >>>> >>>> ==================================> >> but >>>> Einstein was only a human being >>>> not an Angle from heaven >>>> and >>>> 'Hominum -errata est'' (spell ??in Roman >>>> ====== >>>> now >>>> if!! he was wrong about 'curved space' >>>> just imagine!! the damage it was causing >>>> along more than 100 years !! >>>> by preventing / ''screening'' some >>>> other real >>>> needed advance !! >>>> >>>> NO ONE EVER USED IT FOR ANYTHING >>>> >>>> not to speak about PRACTICAL USES >>>> even NASSA by its interstellar projects >>>> (to send a human being to Mars!!! >>>> does no use it!! >>>> except >>>> the ordinary Newtonian physics !! >>>> now >>>> what on earth another ** responsible project** we have >>>> other than sending a human being to mars ??? >>>> 2 >>>> my alternative claim is that >>>> even fantastical it looks in our days >>>> that >>>> ============================================> >> Mass** IS THE >>>> CREAEOR OF **ALL**!! FORCES ---INCLUDING GRAVITY !!! >>>> ==========================================> >> the Faraday ingenious >>>> experiment with the permanent magnet 100yesre ago !!! >>>> was the first TABGIBLE clue to it !! >>>> >>>> unprecedented !! >>>> >>>> ===================================> >> TIA (humbly ) >>>> Eng >>>> Yehiel Porat >>>> 2/11/2018 >>>> =====================> > now >>> >>> odd Bodkin (anonymous)!! >>> wanted to cheat us >>> by saying that: >>> >>> GPS is using 'curved space' physics >>> >>> so what do you think about it ? >>> >>> TIA >>> Y.Porat >>> >>> ===================> > >> >> I somehow knew you were incapable of doing a simple Google search, and that >> your ONLY recourse is to ask people here for help. Doesnt this embarrass >> you a little? >> http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast162/Unit5/gps.html >> >> >> -- >> Odd Bodkin Maker of fine toys, tools, tables > > ========================thank you Bodkin > indeed you are better than me in searching > the net > now > please note > > the GPS system is based on a **thick net**of satellites SURROUND ALL OUR GLOBE !! > > if space is curved > why do we need ALL THAT THICK NET OF SATTELITES !! Can you at least go to www.wikipedia.org and read the article on GPS? > > IF SPACE WAS CURVEED THE EM WAVES > WOULD FOOW THE SATTELITES > EVEN IF NOT 'SISED BY SIDE !! No. You have the mistaken impression that any object at that elevation at any speed would follow the same orbits as the satellites. You have a FUNDAMENTALLY poor understanding of what curved space means. It doesn’t mean that objects at that height all follow the curved track of curved spacetime. THAT’S NOT WHAT IT MEANS! > but run around ''curved space' that is; actualy > not space but just our globe that is curved !~~ globe > that is curved !!!with no need of all that side by side net > probably > with relative short distance straight lines !! Pay attention. The curvature of the surface of the earth has NOTHING to do with the curvature of spacetime at the earth’s surface. The radius of curvature of spacetime near the earth’s surface is 31 million billion feet. The radius of curvature of the earth’s surface is 21 million feet. Do those look like the same numbers to you!?! > > em waves do not move in curved lines ?!! > they move in straight lines > and therefore there is the need of > an > eye to eye system !! > not because curved space !! > but curved globe > 2 > I indicated that > even according to my understanding > SR is right !!! > > so SR calculations are needed !! > and i understand it > but not > Gr calculations > we have to find out > if they use > GR calculations > or may be > just SR calculations > and it is their mistake to mix > Sr > with GR ?? > we have to ask > the real people > who did it > 'with their hands'' > and not from ones that just'' heard' about it and were mixing > Sr with GR!?? > =================TIA > Y.P > ============== > > > > > > > -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | yporat08@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-02 12:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a557a097-2e33-4c48-86d2-955e7a7a6bbf@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #711031 |
On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 7:33:18 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: > <y space !!! > >>>> > >>>> space is nothing!! > >>>> and has no physical/Dimensions / properties > >>>> except length dimension -- > >>>> --that by itself cannot be detected > >>>> if no mass in it !!! > >>>> for me > >>>> Mass is the main ''hero ' of all physics > >>>> I was dwelling on it here along many years ! > > >>>> needed advance !! > >>>> > >>>> NO ONE EVER USED IT FOR ANYTHING > >>>> > > >>>> now > >>>> what on earth another ** responsible project** we have > >>>> other than sending a human being to mars ??? > >>>> 2 > >>>> my alternative claim is that > >>>> even fantastical it looks in our days > >>>> that > >>>> ============================================> >> Mass** IS THE > >>>> CREAEOR OF **ALL**!! FORCES ---INCLUDING GRAVITY !!! > >>>> ==========================================> >> the Faraday ingenious > >>>> experiment with the permanent magnet 100yesre ago !!! > >>>> was the first TABGIBLE clue to it !! > >>>> > >>>> unprecedented !! > >>>> > >>>> ===================================> >> TIA (humbly ) > >>>> Eng > >>>> Yehiel Porat > >>>> 2/11/2018 > >>>> =====================> > now > >>> > >>> odd Bodkin (anonymous)!! > >>> wanted to cheat us > >>> by saying that: > >>> > >>> GPS is using 'curved space' physics > >>> > >>> so what do you think about it ? > >>> > >>> TIA > >>> Y.Porat > >>> > >>> ===================> > > >> > > > indeed you are better than me in searching > > the net > > now > > please note > > > > the GPS system is based on a **thick net**of satellites SURROUND ALL OUR GLOBE !! > > > > if space is curved > > why do we need ALL THAT THICK NET OF SATTELITES !! > > Can you at least go to www.wikipedia.org and read the article on GPS? > > > > > IF SPACE WAS CURVEED THE EM WAVES > > WOULD FOOW THE SATTELITES > > EVEN IF NOT 'SISED BY SIDE !! > > No. You have the mistaken impression that any object at that elevation at > any speed would follow the same orbits as the satellites. > > You have a FUNDAMENTALLY poor understanding of what curved space means. It ========================== I am happy that I don't know that f en theory > doesn’t mean that objects at that height all follow the curved track of > curved spacetime. THAT’S NOT WHAT IT MEANS! > > > but run around ''curved space' that is; actualy > > not space but just our globe that is curved !~~ globe > > that is curved !!!with no need of all that side by side net > > probably > > with relative short distance straight lines !! > > Pay attention. The curvature of the surface of the earth has NOTHING to do > with the curvature of spacetime at the earth’s surface. The radius of ================ really ?? why because you are playing chess with yourself ?? ====== > curvature of spacetime near the earth’s surface is 31 million billion feet. (:-) waw !!it is very impressive why not 32 billion feet ??? e earth’s surface is 21 million feet. Do those > look like the same numbers to you!?! > ================ it looks as witches on a broom … > > em waves do not move in curved lines ?!! > > they move in straight lines > > and therefore there is the need of > > an > > eye to eye system !! > > not because curved space !! > > but curved globe > > 2 > > I indicated that > > even according to my understanding > > SR is right !!! > > > > so SR calculations are needed !! > > and i understand it > > but not > > Gr calculations > > we have to find out > > if they use > > GR calculations > > or may be > > just SR calculations > > and it is their mistake to mix > > Sr > > with GR ?? > > we have to ask > > the real people > > who did it > > 'with their hands'' > > and not from ones that just'' heard' about it and were mixing > > Sr with GR!?? > > =================TIA > > Y.P > > now Bod it is your turn to listen to me : and I wil quote now myself in Google many years ago !! 1 remember the Edington experiment about curved light near earth : that is where mistakes started : 1 I was considered that light has no mass '' I showed andproved an historic finding that PHOTONS HAS MASS THEONLY MASS NOT RELATIVISTIC ANDNOT SHMELAIVISTIC MASS by analyzing the formula E photon-hf (plank ) if you analyze the dimension of it you find to your surprise that the photon has mass AND NOTHING TO MULTIPLY THAT MASS NOT B ANHYTHING RELETIVISTIC COFICIENT !! AND NOT BY zERO !! SO 2 in the Edington experiment light was curving not because any f en curved space but because photons has mass the only mass!! and earth has mass !! so light is curving next to earth E photon =hf remember the Newtonian physic hat is serving NASA and if em waves curve next to earth there is a need for a whole net of satiates to lead it around our globe to be used at any point on earth (look google ''the real single photon mass and energy by Y Porat I heared about it by a guy called Y porat .. so bottom line in short em waves cure around our globe not because of f en curved 'space but because Newtonian physics that NASA use for its interstellar project of sending a human being to mars !!!! not because of f en curve space but because mass is attracting mass and if you don't mind mass is the creator of**all forces including gravity not curved space'' it will be in future in your books TIA Y.Porat ============== TIA Y.P ====================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-02 22:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <prijlu$2ui$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #711055 |
<yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 7:33:18 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> <y space !!! >>>>>> >>>>>> space is nothing!! >>>>>> and has no physical/Dimensions / properties >>>>>> except length dimension -- >>>>>> --that by itself cannot be detected >>>>>> if no mass in it !!! >>>>>> for me >>>>>> Mass is the main ''hero ' of all physics >>>>>> I was dwelling on it here along many years ! >>>>>>> needed advance !! >>>>>> >>>>>> NO ONE EVER USED IT FOR ANYTHING >>>>>> >>>>>>> now >>>>>> what on earth another ** responsible project** we have >>>>>> other than sending a human being to mars ??? >>>>>> 2 >>>>>> my alternative claim is that >>>>>> even fantastical it looks in our days >>>>>> that >>>>>> ============================================> >> Mass** IS THE >>>>>> CREAEOR OF **ALL**!! FORCES ---INCLUDING GRAVITY !!! >>>>>> ==========================================> >> the Faraday ingenious >>>>>> experiment with the permanent magnet 100yesre ago !!! >>>>>> was the first TABGIBLE clue to it !! >>>>>> >>>>>> unprecedented !! >>>>>> >>>>>> ===================================> >> TIA (humbly ) >>>>>> Eng >>>>>> Yehiel Porat >>>>>> 2/11/2018 >>>>>> =====================> > now >>>>> >>>>> odd Bodkin (anonymous)!! >>>>> wanted to cheat us >>>>> by saying that: >>>>> >>>>> GPS is using 'curved space' physics >>>>> >>>>> so what do you think about it ? >>>>> >>>>> TIA >>>>> Y.Porat >>>>> >>>>> ===================> > >>>> >>>> indeed you are better than me in searching >>> the net >>> now >>> please note >>> >>> the GPS system is based on a **thick net**of satellites SURROUND ALL OUR GLOBE !! >>> >>> if space is curved >>> why do we need ALL THAT THICK NET OF SATTELITES !! >> >> Can you at least go to www.wikipedia.org and read the article on GPS? >> >>> >>> IF SPACE WAS CURVEED THE EM WAVES >>> WOULD FOOW THE SATTELITES >>> EVEN IF NOT 'SISED BY SIDE !! >> >> No. You have the mistaken impression that any object at that elevation at >> any speed would follow the same orbits as the satellites. >> >> You have a FUNDAMENTALLY poor understanding of what curved space means. It > > =========================I am happy that I don't know that f en theory Your choice. But it’s stupid to criticize something you literally know nothing about. > > >> doesnt mean that objects at that height all follow the curved track of >> curved spacetime. THATS NOT WHAT IT MEANS! >> >>> but run around ''curved space' that is; actualy >>> not space but just our globe that is curved !~~ globe >>> that is curved !!!with no need of all that side by side net >>> probably >>> with relative short distance straight lines !! >> >> Pay attention. The curvature of the surface of the earth has NOTHING to do >> with the curvature of spacetime at the earths surface. The radius of > ===============really ?? > why > because you are playing chess with yourself ?? > =====> curvature of spacetime near the earths surface is 31 million billion feet. > (:-) > waw !!it is very impressive > why not 32 billion feet ??? I showed you how to do the calculation from measured, everyday numbers. You couldn’t follow it, could you? > > e earths surface is 21 million feet. Do those >> look like the same numbers to you!?! >> ===============it looks as witches on a broom & Anything over someone’s head looks like magic to them. > > >>> em waves do not move in curved lines ?!! >>> they move in straight lines >>> and therefore there is the need of >>> an >>> eye to eye system !! >>> not because curved space !! >>> but curved globe >>> 2 >>> I indicated that >>> even according to my understanding >>> SR is right !!! >>> >>> so SR calculations are needed !! >>> and i understand it >>> but not >>> Gr calculations >>> we have to find out >>> if they use >>> GR calculations >>> or may be >>> just SR calculations >>> and it is their mistake to mix >>> Sr >>> with GR ?? >>> we have to ask >>> the real people >>> who did it >>> 'with their hands'' >>> and not from ones that just'' heard' about it and were mixing >>> Sr with GR!?? >>> =================TIA >>> Y.P >>> > > now Bod > it is your turn to listen to me : > > and I wil quote now myself in Google many years ago !! > 1 > remember the Edington experiment > about curved light near earth : > > that is where mistakes started : > > 1 > I was considered that light has no mass '' > I showed andproved an historic finding that > PHOTONS HAS MASS > THEONLY MASS > NOT RELATIVISTIC ANDNOT SHMELAIVISTIC MASS > by analyzing the formula > E photon-hf (plank ) > if you analyze the dimension of it > you find to your surprise that > the photon has mass > AND NOTHING TO MULTIPLY THAT MASS > NOT B ANHYTHING RELETIVISTIC COFICIENT !! > AND NOT BY zERO !! > SO > 2 > > in the Edington experiment > light was curving not because any f en curved space > but because photons has mass the only mass!! > and earth has mass !! > so light is curving next to earth > > E photon =hf remember > the Newtonian physic hat is serving NASA > and if em waves curve next to earth > there is a need for a whole net of satiates > to lead it around our globe > to be used at any point on earth > (look google > ''the real single photon mass and energy > by Y Porat > I heared about it by a guy called Y porat .. > > so > bottom line in short > em waves cure around our globe > not because of f en curved 'space > but because Newtonian physics > that NASA use > for its interstellar project > of sending a human being to mars !!!! > not because of f en curve space > but because mass is attracting mass > and if you don't mind > mass is the creator of**all forces including gravity > not curved space'' > it will be in future in your books > TIA > Y.Porat > ============= > TIA > Y.P > =================== -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | yporat08@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-02 17:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3ff22056-1667-4b0b-8d0c-6fc90afbd10d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #711122 |
On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 12:39:00 AM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: > <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 7:33:18 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> <y space !!! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> space is nothing!! > >>>>>> and has no physical/Dimensions / properties > >>>>>> except length dimension -- > >>>>>> --that by itself cannot be detected > >>>>>> if no mass in it !!! > >>>>>> for me > >>>>>> Mass is the main ''hero ' of all physics > >>>>>> I was dwelling on it here along many years ! > >>>>>>> needed advance !! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> NO ONE EVER USED IT FOR ANYTHING > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> now > >>>>>> what on earth another ** responsible project** we have > >>>>>> other than sending a human being to mars ??? > >>>>>> 2 > >>>>>> my alternative claim is that > >>>>>> even fantastical it looks in our days > >>>>>> that > >>>>>> ============================================> >> Mass** IS THE > >>>>>> CREAEOR OF **ALL**!! FORCES ---INCLUDING GRAVITY !!! > >>>>>> ==========================================> >> the Faraday ingenious > >>>>>> experiment with the permanent magnet 100yesre ago !!! > >>>>>> was the first TABGIBLE clue to it !! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> unprecedented !! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> ===================================> >> TIA (humbly ) > >>>>>> Eng > >>>>>> Yehiel Porat > >>>>>> 2/11/2018 > >>>>>> =====================> > now > >>>>> > >>>>> odd Bodkin (anonymous)!! > >>>>> wanted to cheat us > >>>>> by saying that: > >>>>> > >>>>> GPS is using 'curved space' physics > >>>>> > >>>>> so what do you think about it ? > >>>>> > >>>>> TIA > >>>>> Y.Porat > >>>>> > >>>>> ===================> > > >>>> > >>>> indeed you are better than me in searching > >>> the net > >>> now > >>> please note > >>> > >>> the GPS system is based on a **thick net**of satellites SURROUND ALL OUR GLOBE !! > >>> > >>> if space is curved > >>> why do we need ALL THAT THICK NET OF SATTELITES !! > >> > >> Can you at least go to www.wikipedia.org and read the article on GPS? > >> > >>> > >>> IF SPACE WAS CURVEED THE EM WAVES > >>> WOULD FOOW THE SATTELITES > >>> EVEN IF NOT 'SISED BY SIDE !! > >> > >> No. You have the mistaken impression that any object at that elevation at > >> any speed would follow the same orbits as the satellites. > >> > >> You have a FUNDAMENTALLY poor understanding of what curved space means. It > > > > =========================I am happy that I don't know that f en theory > > Your choice. But it’s stupid to criticize something you literally know > nothing about. > > > > > > >> doesn t mean that objects at that height all follow the curved track of > >> curved spacetime. THAT S NOT WHAT IT MEANS! > >> > >>> but run around ''curved space' that is; actualy > >>> not space but just our globe that is curved !~~ globe > >>> that is curved !!!with no need of all that side by side net > >>> probably > >>> with relative short distance straight lines !! > >> > >> Pay attention. The curvature of the surface of the earth has NOTHING to do > >> with the curvature of spacetime at the earth s surface. The radius of > > ===============really ?? > > why > > because you are playing chess with yourself ?? > > =====> curvature of spacetime near the earth s surface is 31 million billion feet. > > (:-) > > waw !!it is very impressive > > why not 32 billion feet ??? > > I showed you how to do the calculation from measured, everyday numbers. You > couldn’t follow it, could you? > > > > > e earth s surface is 21 million feet. Do those > >> look like the same numbers to you!?! > >> ===============it looks as witches on a broom & > > Anything over someone’s head looks like magic to them. > > > > > > >>> em waves do not move in curved lines ?!! > >>> they move in straight lines > >>> and therefore there is the need of > >>> an > >>> eye to eye system !! > >>> not because curved space !! > >>> but curved globe > >>> 2 > >>> I indicated that > >>> even according to my understanding > >>> SR is right !!! > >>> > >>> so SR calculations are needed !! > >>> and i understand it > >>> but not > >>> Gr calculations > >>> we have to find out > >>> if they use > >>> GR calculations > >>> or may be > >>> just SR calculations > >>> and it is their mistake to mix > >>> Sr > >>> with GR ?? > >>> we have to ask > >>> the real people > >>> who did it > >>> 'with their hands'' > >>> and not from ones that just'' heard' about it and were mixing > >>> Sr with GR!?? > >>> =================TIA > >>> Y.P > >>> > > > > now Bod > > it is your turn to listen to me : > > > > and I wil quote now myself in Google many years ago !! > > 1 > > remember the Edington experiment > > about curved light near earth : > > > > that is where mistakes started : > > > > 1 > > I was considered that light has no mass '' > > I showed andproved an historic finding that > > PHOTONS HAS MASS > > THEONLY MASS > > NOT RELATIVISTIC ANDNOT SHMELAIVISTIC MASS > > by analyzing the formula > > E photon-hf (plank ) > > if you analyze the dimension of it > > you find to your surprise that > > the photon has mass > > AND NOTHING TO MULTIPLY THAT MASS > > NOT B ANHYTHING RELETIVISTIC COFICIENT !! > > AND NOT BY zERO !! > > SO > > 2 > > > > in the Edington experiment > > light was curving not because any f en curved space > > but because photons has mass the only mass!! > > and earth has mass !! > > so light is curving next to earth > > > > E photon =hf remember > > the Newtonian physic hat is serving NASA > > and if em waves curve next to earth > > there is a need for a whole net of satiates > > to lead it around our globe > > to be used at any point on earth > > (look google > > ''the real single photon mass and energy > > by Y Porat > > I heared about it by a guy called Y porat .. > > > > so > > bottom line in short > > em waves cure around our globe > > not because of f en curved 'space > > but because Newtonian physics > > that NASA use > > for its interstellar project > > of sending a human being to mars !!!! > > not because of f en curve space > > but because mass is attracting mass > > and if you don't mind > > mass is the creator of**all forces including gravity > > not curved space'' > > it will be in future in your books > > TIA > > Y.Porat > > ============= > > TIA > > Y.P > > =================== > > > > -- > Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables =================== dear ingenious Bodkin anonymous !! I unlike you -- am not just a parrot as you I am a little more than a parrot as you with my own creative mind !! so !! if we think about the 'EDINGTON' effect ''/experiment in the 'Eddington effect' the light em beam is indeed curving NEXT TO earth but that curvature is not **sharp enough ** to follow curvature of earth all around !!!! need I have to go on with that explanation ?? may be one of our **thinking ** readers**can guess and go on and explain what is going on with that experiment and current use of it and why is it that we need many** transmission stations to redirect the em beam to curve*** ALL AROUND OUR** GLOBE ?? !! TIA Y.Porat =======================================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | yporat08@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-02 22:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ce5596d5-24e1-4b50-aeef-3109b2e5bee4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #711148 |
On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 2:12:47 AM UTC+2, ypor...@gmail.com wrote: > On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 12:39:00 AM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 7:33:18 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > >> <y space !!! > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> space is nothing!! > > >>>>>> and has no physical/Dimensions / properties > > >>>>>> except length dimension -- > > >>>>>> --that by itself cannot be detected > > >>>>>> if no mass in it !!! > > >>>>>> for me > > >>>>>> Mass is the main ''hero ' of all physics > > >>>>>> I was dwelling on it here along many years ! > > >>>>>>> needed advance !! > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> NO ONE EVER USED IT FOR ANYTHING > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> now > > >>>>>> what on earth another ** responsible project** we have > > >>>>>> other than sending a human being to mars ??? > > >>>>>> 2 > > >>>>>> my alternative claim is that > > >>>>>> even fantastical it looks in our days > > >>>>>> that > > >>>>>> ============================================> >> Mass** IS THE > > >>>>>> CREAEOR OF **ALL**!! FORCES ---INCLUDING GRAVITY !!! > > >>>>>> ==========================================> >> the Faraday ingenious > > >>>>>> experiment with the permanent magnet 100yesre ago !!! > > >>>>>> was the first TABGIBLE clue to it !! > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> unprecedented !! > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> ===================================> >> TIA (humbly ) > > >>>>>> Eng > > >>>>>> Yehiel Porat > > >>>>>> 2/11/2018 > > >>>>>> =====================> > now > > >>>>> > > >>>>> odd Bodkin (anonymous)!! > > >>>>> wanted to cheat us > > >>>>> by saying that: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> GPS is using 'curved space' physics > > >>>>> > > >>>>> so what do you think about it ? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> TIA > > >>>>> Y.Porat > > >>>>> > > >>>>> ===================> > > > >>>> > > >>>> indeed you are better than me in searching > > >>> the net > > >>> now > > >>> please note > > >>> > > >>> the GPS system is based on a **thick net**of satellites SURROUND ALL OUR GLOBE !! > > >>> > > >>> if space is curved > > >>> why do we need ALL THAT THICK NET OF SATTELITES !! > > >> > > >> Can you at least go to www.wikipedia.org and read the article on GPS? > > >> > > >>> > > >>> IF SPACE WAS CURVEED THE EM WAVES > > >>> WOULD FOOW THE SATTELITES > > >>> EVEN IF NOT 'SISED BY SIDE !! > > >> > > >> No. You have the mistaken impression that any object at that elevation at > > >> any speed would follow the same orbits as the satellites. > > >> > > >> You have a FUNDAMENTALLY poor understanding of what curved space means. It > > > > > > =========================I am happy that I don't know that f en theory > > > > Your choice. But it’s stupid to criticize something you literally know > > nothing about. > > > > > > > > > > >> doesn t mean that objects at that height all follow the curved track of > > >> curved spacetime. THAT S NOT WHAT IT MEANS! > > >> > > >>> but run around ''curved space' that is; actualy > > >>> not space but just our globe that is curved !~~ globe > > >>> that is curved !!!with no need of all that side by side net > > >>> probably > > >>> with relative short distance straight lines !! > > >> > > >> Pay attention. The curvature of the surface of the earth has NOTHING to do > > >> with the curvature of spacetime at the earth s surface. The radius of > > > ===============really ?? > > > why > > > because you are playing chess with yourself ?? > > > =====> curvature of spacetime near the earth s surface is 31 million billion feet. > > > (:-) > > > waw !!it is very impressive > > > why not 32 billion feet ??? > > > > I showed you how to do the calculation from measured, everyday numbers. You > > couldn’t follow it, could you? > > > > > > > > e earth s surface is 21 million feet. Do those > > >> look like the same numbers to you!?! > > >> ===============it looks as witches on a broom & > > > > Anything over someone’s head looks like magic to them. > > > > > > > > > > >>> em waves do not move in curved lines ?!! > > >>> they move in straight lines > > >>> and therefore there is the need of > > >>> an > > >>> eye to eye system !! > > >>> not because curved space !! > > >>> but curved globe > > >>> 2 > > >>> I indicated that > > >>> even according to my understanding > > >>> SR is right !!! > > >>> > > >>> so SR calculations are needed !! > > >>> and i understand it > > >>> but not > > >>> Gr calculations > > >>> we have to find out > > >>> if they use > > >>> GR calculations > > >>> or may be > > >>> just SR calculations > > >>> and it is their mistake to mix > > >>> Sr > > >>> with GR ?? > > >>> we have to ask > > >>> the real people > > >>> who did it > > >>> 'with their hands'' > > >>> and not from ones that just'' heard' about it and were mixing > > >>> Sr with GR!?? > > >>> =================TIA > > >>> Y.P > > >>> > > > > > > now Bod > > > it is your turn to listen to me : > > > > > > and I wil quote now myself in Google many years ago !! > > > 1 > > > remember the Edington experiment > > > about curved light near earth : > > > > > > that is where mistakes started : > > > > > > 1 > > > I was considered that light has no mass '' > > > I showed andproved an historic finding that > > > PHOTONS HAS MASS > > > THEONLY MASS > > > NOT RELATIVISTIC ANDNOT SHMELAIVISTIC MASS > > > by analyzing the formula > > > E photon-hf (plank ) > > > if you analyze the dimension of it > > > you find to your surprise that > > > the photon has mass > > > AND NOTHING TO MULTIPLY THAT MASS > > > NOT B ANHYTHING RELETIVISTIC COFICIENT !! > > > AND NOT BY zERO !! > > > SO > > > 2 > > > > > > in the Edington experiment > > > light was curving not because any f en curved space > > > but because photons has mass the only mass!! > > > and earth has mass !! > > > so light is curving next to earth > > > > > > E photon =hf remember > > > the Newtonian physic hat is serving NASA > > > and if em waves curve next to earth > > > there is a need for a whole net of satiates > > > to lead it around our globe > > > to be used at any point on earth > > > (look google > > > ''the real single photon mass and energy > > > by Y Porat > > > I heared about it by a guy called Y porat .. > > > > > > so > > > bottom line in short > > > em waves cure around our globe > > > not because of f en curved 'space > > > but because Newtonian physics > > > that NASA use > > > for its interstellar project > > > of sending a human being to mars !!!! > > > not because of f en curve space > > > but because mass is attracting mass > > > and if you don't mind > > > mass is the creator of**all forces including gravity > > > not curved space'' > > > it will be in future in your books > > > TIA > > > Y.Porat > > > ============= > > > TIA > > > Y.P > > > =================== > > > > > > > > -- > > Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables > =================== > dear ingenious Bodkin anonymous !! > > I unlike you -- am not just a parrot as you > I am a little more than a parrot as you > with my own creative mind !! > so !! > if we think about the > 'EDINGTON' effect ''/experiment > in the 'Eddington effect' > the light em beam > is indeed curving NEXT TO earth > but that curvature is not **sharp enough ** > to follow curvature of earth all around !!!! > > need I have to go on with that explanation ?? > may be one of our **thinking ** readers**can guess and go on and explain what is going on > with that experiment and current use of it > and why is it that we need > many** transmission stations to redirect the em beam > to curve*** ALL AROUND OUR** GLOBE ?? !! > > > TIA > Y.Porat > ======================================= while it is to hard to Bodkin anonymous he is fading away that who he was last 30 years … and now you understand why he is keeping anonymous …. next !!!! to decent non parroting cleaver decent people !! no curvature and no schmervature of space !! ================== Y.Porat ==========================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-03 13:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <prk7pv$cmv$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #711148 |
<yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: > On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 12:39:00 AM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 7:33:18 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> <y space !!! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> space is nothing!! >>>>>>>> and has no physical/Dimensions / properties >>>>>>>> except length dimension -- >>>>>>>> --that by itself cannot be detected >>>>>>>> if no mass in it !!! >>>>>>>> for me >>>>>>>> Mass is the main ''hero ' of all physics >>>>>>>> I was dwelling on it here along many years ! >>>>>>>>> needed advance !! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> NO ONE EVER USED IT FOR ANYTHING >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> now >>>>>>>> what on earth another ** responsible project** we have >>>>>>>> other than sending a human being to mars ??? >>>>>>>> 2 >>>>>>>> my alternative claim is that >>>>>>>> even fantastical it looks in our days >>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>> ============================================> >> Mass** IS THE >>>>>>>> CREAEOR OF **ALL**!! FORCES ---INCLUDING GRAVITY !!! >>>>>>>> ==========================================> >> the Faraday ingenious >>>>>>>> experiment with the permanent magnet 100yesre ago !!! >>>>>>>> was the first TABGIBLE clue to it !! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> unprecedented !! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ===================================> >> TIA (humbly ) >>>>>>>> Eng >>>>>>>> Yehiel Porat >>>>>>>> 2/11/2018 >>>>>>>> =====================> > now >>>>>>> >>>>>>> odd Bodkin (anonymous)!! >>>>>>> wanted to cheat us >>>>>>> by saying that: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> GPS is using 'curved space' physics >>>>>>> >>>>>>> so what do you think about it ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> TIA >>>>>>> Y.Porat >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ===================> > >>>>>> >>>>>> indeed you are better than me in searching >>>>> the net >>>>> now >>>>> please note >>>>> >>>>> the GPS system is based on a **thick net**of satellites SURROUND ALL OUR GLOBE !! >>>>> >>>>> if space is curved >>>>> why do we need ALL THAT THICK NET OF SATTELITES !! >>>> >>>> Can you at least go to www.wikipedia.org and read the article on GPS? >>>> >>>>> >>>>> IF SPACE WAS CURVEED THE EM WAVES >>>>> WOULD FOOW THE SATTELITES >>>>> EVEN IF NOT 'SISED BY SIDE !! >>>> >>>> No. You have the mistaken impression that any object at that elevation at >>>> any speed would follow the same orbits as the satellites. >>>> >>>> You have a FUNDAMENTALLY poor understanding of what curved space means. It >>> >>> =========================I am happy that I don't know that f en theory >> >> Your choice. But its stupid to criticize something you literally know >> nothing about. >> >>> >>> >>>> doesn t mean that objects at that height all follow the curved track of >>>> curved spacetime. THAT S NOT WHAT IT MEANS! >>>> >>>>> but run around ''curved space' that is; actualy >>>>> not space but just our globe that is curved !~~ globe >>>>> that is curved !!!with no need of all that side by side net >>>>> probably >>>>> with relative short distance straight lines !! >>>> >>>> Pay attention. The curvature of the surface of the earth has NOTHING to do >>>> with the curvature of spacetime at the earth s surface. The radius of >>> ===============really ?? >>> why >>> because you are playing chess with yourself ?? >>> =====> curvature of spacetime near the earth s surface is 31 million billion feet. >>> (:-) >>> waw !!it is very impressive >>> why not 32 billion feet ??? >> >> I showed you how to do the calculation from measured, everyday numbers. You >> couldnt follow it, could you? >> >>> >>> e earth s surface is 21 million feet. Do those >>>> look like the same numbers to you!?! >>>> ===============it looks as witches on a broom & >> >> Anything over someones head looks like magic to them. >> >>> >>> >>>>> em waves do not move in curved lines ?!! >>>>> they move in straight lines >>>>> and therefore there is the need of >>>>> an >>>>> eye to eye system !! >>>>> not because curved space !! >>>>> but curved globe >>>>> 2 >>>>> I indicated that >>>>> even according to my understanding >>>>> SR is right !!! >>>>> >>>>> so SR calculations are needed !! >>>>> and i understand it >>>>> but not >>>>> Gr calculations >>>>> we have to find out >>>>> if they use >>>>> GR calculations >>>>> or may be >>>>> just SR calculations >>>>> and it is their mistake to mix >>>>> Sr >>>>> with GR ?? >>>>> we have to ask >>>>> the real people >>>>> who did it >>>>> 'with their hands'' >>>>> and not from ones that just'' heard' about it and were mixing >>>>> Sr with GR!?? >>>>> =================TIA >>>>> Y.P >>>>> >>> >>> now Bod >>> it is your turn to listen to me : >>> >>> and I wil quote now myself in Google many years ago !! >>> 1 >>> remember the Edington experiment >>> about curved light near earth : >>> >>> that is where mistakes started : >>> >>> 1 >>> I was considered that light has no mass '' >>> I showed andproved an historic finding that >>> PHOTONS HAS MASS >>> THEONLY MASS >>> NOT RELATIVISTIC ANDNOT SHMELAIVISTIC MASS >>> by analyzing the formula >>> E photon-hf (plank ) >>> if you analyze the dimension of it >>> you find to your surprise that >>> the photon has mass >>> AND NOTHING TO MULTIPLY THAT MASS >>> NOT B ANHYTHING RELETIVISTIC COFICIENT !! >>> AND NOT BY zERO !! >>> SO >>> 2 >>> >>> in the Edington experiment >>> light was curving not because any f en curved space >>> but because photons has mass the only mass!! >>> and earth has mass !! >>> so light is curving next to earth >>> >>> E photon =hf remember >>> the Newtonian physic hat is serving NASA >>> and if em waves curve next to earth >>> there is a need for a whole net of satiates >>> to lead it around our globe >>> to be used at any point on earth >>> (look google >>> ''the real single photon mass and energy >>> by Y Porat >>> I heared about it by a guy called Y porat .. >>> >>> so >>> bottom line in short >>> em waves cure around our globe >>> not because of f en curved 'space >>> but because Newtonian physics >>> that NASA use >>> for its interstellar project >>> of sending a human being to mars !!!! >>> not because of f en curve space >>> but because mass is attracting mass >>> and if you don't mind >>> mass is the creator of**all forces including gravity >>> not curved space'' >>> it will be in future in your books >>> TIA >>> Y.Porat >>> ============> > TIA >>> Y.P >>> ==================> >> >> >> -- >> Odd Bodkin Maker of fine toys, tools, tables > ==================dear ingenious Bodkin anonymous !! > > I unlike you -- am not just a parrot as you > I am a little more than a parrot as you > with my own creative mind !! It’s interesting that you justify not knowing a damn thing about relativity by claiming that knowledge would make you a parrot. You seem to favor being “creative” from a position of ignorance. As though that is a virtue. > so !! > if we think about the > 'EDINGTON' effect ''/experiment > in the 'Eddington effect' > the light em beam > is indeed curving NEXT TO earth > but that curvature is not **sharp enough ** > to follow curvature of earth all around !!!! Of course not. The calculation I did shows that. > > need I have to go on with that explanation ?? > may be one of our **thinking ** readers**can guess and go on and > explain what is going on > with that experiment and current use of it > and why is it that we need > many** transmission stations to redirect the em beam > to curve*** ALL AROUND OUR** GLOBE ?? !! That’s not what’s going on. That’s not the reason there are so many satellites. Instead of finding out what the reason is, you make something up, with your “creative” mind. > > > TIA > Y.Porat > ====================================== > -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | yporat08@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-03 07:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3fe7743c-c58c-46a8-b039-c3f2ccd0fef3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #711216 |
On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 3:28:37 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: > <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 12:39:00 AM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 7:33:18 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>> <y space !!! > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> space is nothing!! > >>>>>>>> and has no physical/Dimensions / properties > >>>>>>>> except length dimension -- > >>>>>>>> --that by itself cannot be detected > >>>>>>>> if no mass in it !!! > >>>>>>>> for me > >>>>>>>> Mass is the main ''hero ' of all physics > >>>>>>>> I was dwelling on it here along many years ! > >>>>>>>>> needed advance !! > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> NO ONE EVER USED IT FOR ANYTHING > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> now > >>>>>>>> what on earth another ** responsible project** we have > >>>>>>>> other than sending a human being to mars ??? > >>>>>>>> 2 > >>>>>>>> my alternative claim is that > >>>>>>>> even fantastical it looks in our days > >>>>>>>> that > >>>>>>>> ============================================> >> Mass** IS THE > >>>>>>>> CREAEOR OF **ALL**!! FORCES ---INCLUDING GRAVITY !!! > >>>>>>>> ==========================================> >> the Faraday ingenious > >>>>>>>> experiment with the permanent magnet 100yesre ago !!! > >>>>>>>> was the first TABGIBLE clue to it !! > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> unprecedented !! > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> ===================================> >> TIA (humbly ) > >>>>>>>> Eng > >>>>>>>> Yehiel Porat > >>>>>>>> 2/11/2018 > >>>>>>>> =====================> > now > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> odd Bodkin (anonymous)!! > >>>>>>> wanted to cheat us > >>>>>>> by saying that: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> GPS is using 'curved space' physics > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> so what do you think about it ? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> TIA > >>>>>>> Y.Porat > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> ===================> > > >>>>>> > >>>>>> indeed you are better than me in searching > >>>>> the net > >>>>> now > >>>>> please note > >>>>> > >>>>> the GPS system is based on a **thick net**of satellites SURROUND ALL OUR GLOBE !! > >>>>> > >>>>> if space is curved > >>>>> why do we need ALL THAT THICK NET OF SATTELITES !! > >>>> > >>>> Can you at least go to www.wikipedia.org and read the article on GPS? > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> IF SPACE WAS CURVEED THE EM WAVES > >>>>> WOULD FOOW THE SATTELITES > >>>>> EVEN IF NOT 'SISED BY SIDE !! > >>>> > >>>> No. You have the mistaken impression that any object at that elevation at > >>>> any speed would follow the same orbits as the satellites. > >>>> > >>>> You have a FUNDAMENTALLY poor understanding of what curved space means. It > >>> > >>> =========================I am happy that I don't know that f en theory > >> > >> Your choice. But it s stupid to criticize something you literally know > >> nothing about. > >> > >>> > >>> > >>>> doesn t mean that objects at that height all follow the curved track of > >>>> curved spacetime. THAT S NOT WHAT IT MEANS! > >>>> > >>>>> but run around ''curved space' that is; actualy > >>>>> not space but just our globe that is curved !~~ globe > >>>>> that is curved !!!with no need of all that side by side net > >>>>> probably > >>>>> with relative short distance straight lines !! > >>>> > >>>> Pay attention. The curvature of the surface of the earth has NOTHING to do > >>>> with the curvature of spacetime at the earth s surface. The radius of > >>> ===============really ?? > >>> why > >>> because you are playing chess with yourself ?? > >>> =====> curvature of spacetime near the earth s surface is 31 million billion feet. > >>> (:-) > >>> waw !!it is very impressive > >>> why not 32 billion feet ??? > >> > >> I showed you how to do the calculation from measured, everyday numbers. You > >> couldn t follow it, could you? > >> > >>> > >>> e earth s surface is 21 million feet. Do those > >>>> look like the same numbers to you!?! > >>>> ===============it looks as witches on a broom & > >> > >> Anything over someone s head looks like magic to them. > >> > >>> > >>> > >>>>> em waves do not move in curved lines ?!! > >>>>> they move in straight lines > >>>>> and therefore there is the need of > >>>>> an > >>>>> eye to eye system !! > >>>>> not because curved space !! > >>>>> but curved globe > >>>>> 2 > >>>>> I indicated that > >>>>> even according to my understanding > >>>>> SR is right !!! > >>>>> > >>>>> so SR calculations are needed !! > >>>>> and i understand it > >>>>> but not > >>>>> Gr calculations > >>>>> we have to find out > >>>>> if they use > >>>>> GR calculations > >>>>> or may be > >>>>> just SR calculations > >>>>> and it is their mistake to mix > >>>>> Sr > >>>>> with GR ?? > >>>>> we have to ask > >>>>> the real people > >>>>> who did it > >>>>> 'with their hands'' > >>>>> and not from ones that just'' heard' about it and were mixing > >>>>> Sr with GR!?? > >>>>> =================TIA > >>>>> Y.P > >>>>> > >>> > >>> now Bod > >>> it is your turn to listen to me : > >>> > >>> and I wil quote now myself in Google many years ago !! > >>> 1 > >>> remember the Edington experiment > >>> about curved light near earth : > >>> > >>> that is where mistakes started : > >>> > >>> 1 > >>> I was considered that light has no mass '' > >>> I showed andproved an historic finding that > >>> PHOTONS HAS MASS > >>> THEONLY MASS > >>> NOT RELATIVISTIC ANDNOT SHMELAIVISTIC MASS > >>> by analyzing the formula > >>> E photon-hf (plank ) > >>> if you analyze the dimension of it > >>> you find to your surprise that > >>> the photon has mass > >>> AND NOTHING TO MULTIPLY THAT MASS > >>> NOT B ANHYTHING RELETIVISTIC COFICIENT !! > >>> AND NOT BY zERO !! > >>> SO > >>> 2 > >>> > >>> in the Edington experiment > >>> light was curving not because any f en curved space > >>> but because photons has mass the only mass!! > >>> and earth has mass !! > >>> so light is curving next to earth > >>> > >>> E photon =hf remember > >>> the Newtonian physic hat is serving NASA > >>> and if em waves curve next to earth > >>> there is a need for a whole net of satiates > >>> to lead it around our globe > >>> to be used at any point on earth > >>> (look google > >>> ''the real single photon mass and energy > >>> by Y Porat > >>> I heared about it by a guy called Y porat .. > >>> > >>> so > >>> bottom line in short > >>> em waves cure around our globe > >>> not because of f en curved 'space > >>> but because Newtonian physics > >>> that NASA use > >>> for its interstellar project > >>> of sending a human being to mars !!!! > >>> not because of f en curve space > >>> but because mass is attracting mass > >>> and if you don't mind > >>> mass is the creator of**all forces including gravity > >>> not curved space'' > >>> it will be in future in your books > >>> TIA > >>> Y.Porat > >>> ============> > TIA > >>> Y.P > >>> ==================> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Odd Bodkin Maker of fine toys, tools, tables > > ==================dear ingenious Bodkin anonymous !! > > > > I unlike you -- am not just a parrot as you > > I am a little more than a parrot as you > > with my own creative mind !! > > It’s interesting that you justify not knowing a damn thing about relativity > by claiming that knowledge would make you a parrot. > > You seem to favor being “creative” from a position of ignorance. As though > that is a virtue. > > > so !! > > if we think about the > > 'EDINGTON' effect ''/experiment > > in the 'Eddington effect' > > the light em beam > > is indeed curving NEXT TO earth > > but that curvature is not **sharp enough ** > > to follow curvature of earth all around !!!! > > Of course not. The calculation I did shows that. ==== show those calculations and don't hand wave !! > > > > > need I have to go on with that explanation ?? > > may be one of our **thinking ** readers**can guess and go on and > > explain what is going on > > with that experiment and current use of it > > and why is it that we need > > many** transmission stations to redirect the em beam > > to curve*** ALL AROUND OUR** GLOBE ?? !! > > That’s not what’s going on. That’s not the reason there are so many > satellites. Instead of finding out what the reason is, you make something > up, with your “creative” mind. ==== I showed yo parrot that even theortically and experimentally the Edington em wavs were only partially curving around globe but di t go on curving the globe because your f en curved space did not exist all aground our globe !! and that partial deviation we had was because ordinary local interaction between mass of earth and mass of PHOTON !!! and in that beeam going on it dint find your f en curved space AND THEREFORE CONTINUED IN A*** SYRIGHT LINE !!!! got it idiot why went on straight line while your f en curved space is ''said to exist '' all around our globe !!! is does not saied to '' exist '' ***only*t the above that specific location but '''all around our globe !! and I did not occur in practice !! got it parrot TIA Y.P =============================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-03 14:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <prkc7c$k5o$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #711224 |
<yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: > On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 3:28:37 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 12:39:00 AM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 7:33:18 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>> <y space !!! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> space is nothing!! >>>>>>>>>> and has no physical/Dimensions / properties >>>>>>>>>> except length dimension -- >>>>>>>>>> --that by itself cannot be detected >>>>>>>>>> if no mass in it !!! >>>>>>>>>> for me >>>>>>>>>> Mass is the main ''hero ' of all physics >>>>>>>>>> I was dwelling on it here along many years ! >>>>>>>>>>> needed advance !! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> NO ONE EVER USED IT FOR ANYTHING >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> now >>>>>>>>>> what on earth another ** responsible project** we have >>>>>>>>>> other than sending a human being to mars ??? >>>>>>>>>> 2 >>>>>>>>>> my alternative claim is that >>>>>>>>>> even fantastical it looks in our days >>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>> ============================================> >> Mass** IS THE >>>>>>>>>> CREAEOR OF **ALL**!! FORCES ---INCLUDING GRAVITY !!! >>>>>>>>>> ==========================================> >> the Faraday ingenious >>>>>>>>>> experiment with the permanent magnet 100yesre ago !!! >>>>>>>>>> was the first TABGIBLE clue to it !! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> unprecedented !! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ===================================> >> TIA (humbly ) >>>>>>>>>> Eng >>>>>>>>>> Yehiel Porat >>>>>>>>>> 2/11/2018 >>>>>>>>>> =====================> > now >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> odd Bodkin (anonymous)!! >>>>>>>>> wanted to cheat us >>>>>>>>> by saying that: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> GPS is using 'curved space' physics >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> so what do you think about it ? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> TIA >>>>>>>>> Y.Porat >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ===================> > >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> indeed you are better than me in searching >>>>>>> the net >>>>>>> now >>>>>>> please note >>>>>>> >>>>>>> the GPS system is based on a **thick net**of satellites SURROUND ALL OUR GLOBE !! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> if space is curved >>>>>>> why do we need ALL THAT THICK NET OF SATTELITES !! >>>>>> >>>>>> Can you at least go to www.wikipedia.org and read the article on GPS? >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> IF SPACE WAS CURVEED THE EM WAVES >>>>>>> WOULD FOOW THE SATTELITES >>>>>>> EVEN IF NOT 'SISED BY SIDE !! >>>>>> >>>>>> No. You have the mistaken impression that any object at that elevation at >>>>>> any speed would follow the same orbits as the satellites. >>>>>> >>>>>> You have a FUNDAMENTALLY poor understanding of what curved space means. It >>>>> >>>>> =========================I am happy that I don't know that f en theory >>>> >>>> Your choice. But it s stupid to criticize something you literally know >>>> nothing about. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> doesn t mean that objects at that height all follow the curved track of >>>>>> curved spacetime. THAT S NOT WHAT IT MEANS! >>>>>> >>>>>>> but run around ''curved space' that is; actualy >>>>>>> not space but just our globe that is curved !~~ globe >>>>>>> that is curved !!!with no need of all that side by side net >>>>>>> probably >>>>>>> with relative short distance straight lines !! >>>>>> >>>>>> Pay attention. The curvature of the surface of the earth has NOTHING to do >>>>>> with the curvature of spacetime at the earth s surface. The radius of >>>>> ===============really ?? >>>>> why >>>>> because you are playing chess with yourself ?? >>>>> =====> curvature of spacetime near the earth s surface is 31 million billion feet. >>>>> (:-) >>>>> waw !!it is very impressive >>>>> why not 32 billion feet ??? >>>> >>>> I showed you how to do the calculation from measured, everyday numbers. You >>>> couldn t follow it, could you? >>>> >>>>> >>>>> e earth s surface is 21 million feet. Do those >>>>>> look like the same numbers to you!?! >>>>>> ===============it looks as witches on a broom & >>>> >>>> Anything over someone s head looks like magic to them. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> em waves do not move in curved lines ?!! >>>>>>> they move in straight lines >>>>>>> and therefore there is the need of >>>>>>> an >>>>>>> eye to eye system !! >>>>>>> not because curved space !! >>>>>>> but curved globe >>>>>>> 2 >>>>>>> I indicated that >>>>>>> even according to my understanding >>>>>>> SR is right !!! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> so SR calculations are needed !! >>>>>>> and i understand it >>>>>>> but not >>>>>>> Gr calculations >>>>>>> we have to find out >>>>>>> if they use >>>>>>> GR calculations >>>>>>> or may be >>>>>>> just SR calculations >>>>>>> and it is their mistake to mix >>>>>>> Sr >>>>>>> with GR ?? >>>>>>> we have to ask >>>>>>> the real people >>>>>>> who did it >>>>>>> 'with their hands'' >>>>>>> and not from ones that just'' heard' about it and were mixing >>>>>>> Sr with GR!?? >>>>>>> =================TIA >>>>>>> Y.P >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> now Bod >>>>> it is your turn to listen to me : >>>>> >>>>> and I wil quote now myself in Google many years ago !! >>>>> 1 >>>>> remember the Edington experiment >>>>> about curved light near earth : >>>>> >>>>> that is where mistakes started : >>>>> >>>>> 1 >>>>> I was considered that light has no mass '' >>>>> I showed andproved an historic finding that >>>>> PHOTONS HAS MASS >>>>> THEONLY MASS >>>>> NOT RELATIVISTIC ANDNOT SHMELAIVISTIC MASS >>>>> by analyzing the formula >>>>> E photon-hf (plank ) >>>>> if you analyze the dimension of it >>>>> you find to your surprise that >>>>> the photon has mass >>>>> AND NOTHING TO MULTIPLY THAT MASS >>>>> NOT B ANHYTHING RELETIVISTIC COFICIENT !! >>>>> AND NOT BY zERO !! >>>>> SO >>>>> 2 >>>>> >>>>> in the Edington experiment >>>>> light was curving not because any f en curved space >>>>> but because photons has mass the only mass!! >>>>> and earth has mass !! >>>>> so light is curving next to earth >>>>> >>>>> E photon =hf remember >>>>> the Newtonian physic hat is serving NASA >>>>> and if em waves curve next to earth >>>>> there is a need for a whole net of satiates >>>>> to lead it around our globe >>>>> to be used at any point on earth >>>>> (look google >>>>> ''the real single photon mass and energy >>>>> by Y Porat >>>>> I heared about it by a guy called Y porat .. >>>>> >>>>> so >>>>> bottom line in short >>>>> em waves cure around our globe >>>>> not because of f en curved 'space >>>>> but because Newtonian physics >>>>> that NASA use >>>>> for its interstellar project >>>>> of sending a human being to mars !!!! >>>>> not because of f en curve space >>>>> but because mass is attracting mass >>>>> and if you don't mind >>>>> mass is the creator of**all forces including gravity >>>>> not curved space'' >>>>> it will be in future in your books >>>>> TIA >>>>> Y.Porat >>>>> ============> > TIA >>>>> Y.P >>>>> ==================> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Odd Bodkin Maker of fine toys, tools, tables >>> ==================dear ingenious Bodkin anonymous !! >>> >>> I unlike you -- am not just a parrot as you >>> I am a little more than a parrot as you >>> with my own creative mind !! >> >> It’s interesting that you justify not knowing a damn thing about relativity >> by claiming that knowledge would make you a parrot. >> >> You seem to favor being “creative” from a position of ignorance. As though >> that is a virtue. >> >>> so !! >>> if we think about the >>> 'EDINGTON' effect ''/experiment >>> in the 'Eddington effect' >>> the light em beam >>> is indeed curving NEXT TO earth >>> but that curvature is not **sharp enough ** >>> to follow curvature of earth all around !!!! >> >> Of course not. The calculation I did shows that. > > > ==== > show those calculations > and don't hand wave !! I did! You couldn’t follow them? Remember the sagitta? The chord? The radius of curvature and the relation between them? If you don’t remember what I told you just two days ago, then you mind has rotted past pointlessness. > > >> >>> >>> need I have to go on with that explanation ?? >>> may be one of our **thinking ** readers**can guess and go on and >>> explain what is going on >>> with that experiment and current use of it >>> and why is it that we need >>> many** transmission stations to redirect the em beam >>> to curve*** ALL AROUND OUR** GLOBE ?? !! >> >> That’s not what’s going on. That’s not the reason there are so many >> satellites. Instead of finding out what the reason is, you make something >> up, with your “creative” mind. > > ==== > I showed yo parrot that even theortically > and experimentally > the Edington em wavs were only partially curving > around globe > but di t go on curving the globe > because No one expects it to! Curved space does not mean that objects follow the curve of that space to follow the curve of the surface!! The two curves have nothing to do with each other. Nothing! Shake the bad idea from your head! It’s flat wrong! Read what the theory actually says rather than making up bullshit about it. > > your f en curved space > did not exist > all aground our globe !! > > and that partial deviation > we had > was because ordinary local interaction > between > mass of earth and mass of PHOTON !!! > and in that beeam going on > it dint find your f en curved space > > AND THEREFORE > CONTINUED IN A*** SYRIGHT LINE !!!! > got it idiot > why went on straight line > while your f en curved space > is ''said to exist '' > all around our globe !!! > is does not saied to '' exist '' ***only*t the above that specific location > but '''all around our globe !! > and I did not occur in practice !! > > got it parrot > > TIA > Y.P > ============================= > > -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | yporat08@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-03 11:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <45fe53a0-7eb5-4530-b589-76ed42b1ce34@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #711228 |
On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 4:44:00 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: > <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 3:28:37 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 12:39:00 AM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 7:33:18 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>>>> <y space !!! > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> space is nothing!! > >>>>>>>>>> and has no physical/Dimensions / properties > >>>>>>>>>> except length dimension -- > >>>>>>>>>> --that by itself cannot be detected > >>>>>>>>>> if no mass in it !!! > >>>>>>>>>> for me > >>>>>>>>>> Mass is the main ''hero ' of all physics > >>>>>>>>>> I was dwelling on it here along many years ! > >>>>>>>>>>> needed advance !! > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> NO ONE EVER USED IT FOR ANYTHING > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> now > >>>>>>>>>> what on earth another ** responsible project** we have > >>>>>>>>>> other than sending a human being to mars ??? > >>>>>>>>>> 2 > >>>>>>>>>> my alternative claim is that > >>>>>>>>>> even fantastical it looks in our days > >>>>>>>>>> that > >>>>>>>>>> ============================================> >> Mass** IS THE > >>>>>>>>>> CREAEOR OF **ALL**!! FORCES ---INCLUDING GRAVITY !!! > >>>>>>>>>> ==========================================> >> the Faraday ingenious > >>>>>>>>>> experiment with the permanent magnet 100yesre ago !!! > >>>>>>>>>> was the first TABGIBLE clue to it !! > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> unprecedented !! > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> ===================================> >> TIA (humbly ) > >>>>>>>>>> Eng > >>>>>>>>>> Yehiel Porat > >>>>>>>>>> 2/11/2018 > >>>>>>>>>> =====================> > now > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> odd Bodkin (anonymous)!! > >>>>>>>>> wanted to cheat us > >>>>>>>>> by saying that: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> GPS is using 'curved space' physics > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> so what do you think about it ? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> TIA > >>>>>>>>> Y.Porat > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> ===================> > > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> indeed you are better than me in searching > >>>>>>> the net > >>>>>>> now > >>>>>>> please note > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> the GPS system is based on a **thick net**of satellites SURROUND ALL OUR GLOBE !! > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> if space is curved > >>>>>>> why do we need ALL THAT THICK NET OF SATTELITES !! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Can you at least go to www.wikipedia.org and read the article on GPS? > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> IF SPACE WAS CURVEED THE EM WAVES > >>>>>>> WOULD FOOW THE SATTELITES > >>>>>>> EVEN IF NOT 'SISED BY SIDE !! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> No. You have the mistaken impression that any object at that elevation at > >>>>>> any speed would follow the same orbits as the satellites. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You have a FUNDAMENTALLY poor understanding of what curved space means. It > >>>>> > >>>>> =========================I am happy that I don't know that f en theory > >>>> > >>>> Your choice. But it s stupid to criticize something you literally know > >>>> nothing about. > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> doesn t mean that objects at that height all follow the curved track of > >>>>>> curved spacetime. THAT S NOT WHAT IT MEANS! > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> but run around ''curved space' that is; actualy > >>>>>>> not space but just our globe that is curved !~~ globe > >>>>>>> that is curved !!!with no need of all that side by side net > >>>>>>> probably > >>>>>>> with relative short distance straight lines !! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Pay attention. The curvature of the surface of the earth has NOTHING to do > >>>>>> with the curvature of spacetime at the earth s surface. The radius of > >>>>> ===============really ?? > >>>>> why > >>>>> because you are playing chess with yourself ?? > >>>>> =====> curvature of spacetime near the earth s surface is 31 million billion feet. > >>>>> (:-) > >>>>> waw !!it is very impressive > >>>>> why not 32 billion feet ??? > >>>> > >>>> I showed you how to do the calculation from measured, everyday numbers. You > >>>> couldn t follow it, could you? > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> e earth s surface is 21 million feet. Do those > >>>>>> look like the same numbers to you!?! > >>>>>> ===============it looks as witches on a broom & > >>>> > >>>> Anything over someone s head looks like magic to them. > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>> em waves do not move in curved lines ?!! > >>>>>>> they move in straight lines > >>>>>>> and therefore there is the need of > >>>>>>> an > >>>>>>> eye to eye system !! > >>>>>>> not because curved space !! > >>>>>>> but curved globe > >>>>>>> 2 > >>>>>>> I indicated that > >>>>>>> even according to my understanding > >>>>>>> SR is right !!! > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> so SR calculations are needed !! > >>>>>>> and i understand it > >>>>>>> but not > >>>>>>> Gr calculations > >>>>>>> we have to find out > >>>>>>> if they use > >>>>>>> GR calculations > >>>>>>> or may be > >>>>>>> just SR calculations > >>>>>>> and it is their mistake to mix > >>>>>>> Sr > >>>>>>> with GR ?? > >>>>>>> we have to ask > >>>>>>> the real people > >>>>>>> who did it > >>>>>>> 'with their hands'' > >>>>>>> and not from ones that just'' heard' about it and were mixing > >>>>>>> Sr with GR!?? > >>>>>>> =================TIA > >>>>>>> Y.P > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> now Bod > >>>>> it is your turn to listen to me : > >>>>> > >>>>> and I wil quote now myself in Google many years ago !! > >>>>> 1 > >>>>> remember the Edington experiment > >>>>> about curved light near earth : > >>>>> > >>>>> that is where mistakes started : > >>>>> > >>>>> 1 > >>>>> I was considered that light has no mass '' > >>>>> I showed andproved an historic finding that > >>>>> PHOTONS HAS MASS > >>>>> THEONLY MASS > >>>>> NOT RELATIVISTIC ANDNOT SHMELAIVISTIC MASS > >>>>> by analyzing the formula > >>>>> E photon-hf (plank ) > >>>>> if you analyze the dimension of it > >>>>> you find to your surprise that > >>>>> the photon has mass > >>>>> AND NOTHING TO MULTIPLY THAT MASS > >>>>> NOT B ANHYTHING RELETIVISTIC COFICIENT !! > >>>>> AND NOT BY zERO !! > >>>>> SO > >>>>> 2 > >>>>> > >>>>> in the Edington experiment > >>>>> light was curving not because any f en curved space > >>>>> but because photons has mass the only mass!! > >>>>> and earth has mass !! > >>>>> so light is curving next to earth > >>>>> > >>>>> E photon =hf remember > >>>>> the Newtonian physic hat is serving NASA > >>>>> and if em waves curve next to earth > >>>>> there is a need for a whole net of satiates > >>>>> to lead it around our globe > >>>>> to be used at any point on earth > >>>>> (look google > >>>>> ''the real single photon mass and energy > >>>>> by Y Porat > >>>>> I heared about it by a guy called Y porat .. > >>>>> > >>>>> so > >>>>> bottom line in short > >>>>> em waves cure around our globe > >>>>> not because of f en curved 'space > >>>>> but because Newtonian physics > >>>>> that NASA use > >>>>> for its interstellar project > >>>>> of sending a human being to mars !!!! > >>>>> not because of f en curve space > >>>>> but because mass is attracting mass > >>>>> and if you don't mind > >>>>> mass is the creator of**all forces including gravity > >>>>> not curved space'' > >>>>> it will be in future in your books > >>>>> TIA > >>>>> Y.Porat > >>>>> ============> > TIA > >>>>> Y.P > >>>>> ==================> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Odd Bodkin Maker of fine toys, tools, tables > >>> ==================dear ingenious Bodkin anonymous !! > >>> > >>> I unlike you -- am not just a parrot as you > >>> I am a little more than a parrot as you > >>> with my own creative mind !! > >> > >> It’s interesting that you justify not knowing a damn thing about relativity > >> by claiming that knowledge would make you a parrot. > >> > >> You seem to favor being “creative” from a position of ignorance. As though > >> that is a virtue. > >> > >>> so !! > >>> if we think about the > >>> 'EDINGTON' effect ''/experiment > >>> in the 'Eddington effect' > >>> the light em beam > >>> is indeed curving NEXT TO earth > >>> but that curvature is not **sharp enough ** > >>> to follow curvature of earth all around !!!! > >> > >> Of course not. The calculation I did shows that. > > > > > > ==== > > show those calculations > > and don't hand wave !! > > I did! You couldn’t follow them? Remember the sagitta? The chord? The > radius of curvature and the relation between them? > > If you don’t remember what I told you just two days ago, then you mind has > rotted past pointlessness. > > > > > > >> > >>> > >>> need I have to go on with that explanation ?? > >>> may be one of our **thinking ** readers**can guess and go on and > >>> explain what is going on > >>> with that experiment and current use of it > >>> and why is it that we need > >>> many** transmission stations to redirect the em beam > >>> to curve*** ALL AROUND OUR** GLOBE ?? !! > >> > >> That’s not what’s going on. That’s not the reason there are so many > >> satellites. Instead of finding out what the reason is, you make something > >> up, with your “creative” mind. > > > > ==== > > I showed yo parrot that even theortically > > and experimentally > > the Edington em wavs were only partially curving > > around globe > > but di t go on curving the globe > > because > > No one expects it to! Curved space does not mean that objects follow the > curve of that space to follow the curve of the surface!! The two curves > have nothing to do with each other. Nothing! Shake the bad idea from your > head! It’s flat wrong! > > Read what the theory actually says rather than making up bullshit about it. = =================== since you are such a great expert of curved space please tell us how that curved space will look like all around the masses involved in the Edington experiment ?? TIA Y.Porat =========================== > > > > > > your f en curved space > > did not exist > > all aground our globe !! > > > > and that partial deviation > > we had > > was because ordinary local interaction > > between > > mass of earth and mass of PHOTON !!! > > and in that beeam going on > > it dint find your f en curved space > > > > AND THEREFORE > > CONTINUED IN A*** SYRIGHT LINE !!!! > > > -- >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-03 18:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <prko7s$18lr$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #711257 |
<yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: > On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 4:44:00 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 3:28:37 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 12:39:00 AM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 7:33:18 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>> <y space !!! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> space is nothing!! >>>>>>>>>>>> and has no physical/Dimensions / properties >>>>>>>>>>>> except length dimension -- >>>>>>>>>>>> --that by itself cannot be detected >>>>>>>>>>>> if no mass in it !!! >>>>>>>>>>>> for me >>>>>>>>>>>> Mass is the main ''hero ' of all physics >>>>>>>>>>>> I was dwelling on it here along many years ! >>>>>>>>>>>>> needed advance !! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> NO ONE EVER USED IT FOR ANYTHING >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> now >>>>>>>>>>>> what on earth another ** responsible project** we have >>>>>>>>>>>> other than sending a human being to mars ??? >>>>>>>>>>>> 2 >>>>>>>>>>>> my alternative claim is that >>>>>>>>>>>> even fantastical it looks in our days >>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>> ============================================> >> Mass** IS THE >>>>>>>>>>>> CREAEOR OF **ALL**!! FORCES ---INCLUDING GRAVITY !!! >>>>>>>>>>>> ==========================================> >> the Faraday ingenious >>>>>>>>>>>> experiment with the permanent magnet 100yesre ago !!! >>>>>>>>>>>> was the first TABGIBLE clue to it !! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> unprecedented !! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ===================================> >> TIA (humbly ) >>>>>>>>>>>> Eng >>>>>>>>>>>> Yehiel Porat >>>>>>>>>>>> 2/11/2018 >>>>>>>>>>>> =====================> > now >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> odd Bodkin (anonymous)!! >>>>>>>>>>> wanted to cheat us >>>>>>>>>>> by saying that: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> GPS is using 'curved space' physics >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> so what do you think about it ? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> TIA >>>>>>>>>>> Y.Porat >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ===================> > >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> indeed you are better than me in searching >>>>>>>>> the net >>>>>>>>> now >>>>>>>>> please note >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> the GPS system is based on a **thick net**of satellites SURROUND ALL OUR GLOBE !! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> if space is curved >>>>>>>>> why do we need ALL THAT THICK NET OF SATTELITES !! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Can you at least go to www.wikipedia.org and read the article on GPS? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> IF SPACE WAS CURVEED THE EM WAVES >>>>>>>>> WOULD FOOW THE SATTELITES >>>>>>>>> EVEN IF NOT 'SISED BY SIDE !! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No. You have the mistaken impression that any object at that elevation at >>>>>>>> any speed would follow the same orbits as the satellites. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You have a FUNDAMENTALLY poor understanding of what curved space means. It >>>>>>> >>>>>>> =========================I am happy that I don't know that f en theory >>>>>> >>>>>> Your choice. But it s stupid to criticize something you literally know >>>>>> nothing about. >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> doesn t mean that objects at that height all follow the curved track of >>>>>>>> curved spacetime. THAT S NOT WHAT IT MEANS! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> but run around ''curved space' that is; actualy >>>>>>>>> not space but just our globe that is curved !~~ globe >>>>>>>>> that is curved !!!with no need of all that side by side net >>>>>>>>> probably >>>>>>>>> with relative short distance straight lines !! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Pay attention. The curvature of the surface of the earth has NOTHING to do >>>>>>>> with the curvature of spacetime at the earth s surface. The radius of >>>>>>> ===============really ?? >>>>>>> why >>>>>>> because you are playing chess with yourself ?? >>>>>>> =====> curvature of spacetime near the earth s surface is 31 million billion feet. >>>>>>> (:-) >>>>>>> waw !!it is very impressive >>>>>>> why not 32 billion feet ??? >>>>>> >>>>>> I showed you how to do the calculation from measured, everyday numbers. You >>>>>> couldn t follow it, could you? >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> e earth s surface is 21 million feet. Do those >>>>>>>> look like the same numbers to you!?! >>>>>>>> ===============it looks as witches on a broom & >>>>>> >>>>>> Anything over someone s head looks like magic to them. >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> em waves do not move in curved lines ?!! >>>>>>>>> they move in straight lines >>>>>>>>> and therefore there is the need of >>>>>>>>> an >>>>>>>>> eye to eye system !! >>>>>>>>> not because curved space !! >>>>>>>>> but curved globe >>>>>>>>> 2 >>>>>>>>> I indicated that >>>>>>>>> even according to my understanding >>>>>>>>> SR is right !!! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> so SR calculations are needed !! >>>>>>>>> and i understand it >>>>>>>>> but not >>>>>>>>> Gr calculations >>>>>>>>> we have to find out >>>>>>>>> if they use >>>>>>>>> GR calculations >>>>>>>>> or may be >>>>>>>>> just SR calculations >>>>>>>>> and it is their mistake to mix >>>>>>>>> Sr >>>>>>>>> with GR ?? >>>>>>>>> we have to ask >>>>>>>>> the real people >>>>>>>>> who did it >>>>>>>>> 'with their hands'' >>>>>>>>> and not from ones that just'' heard' about it and were mixing >>>>>>>>> Sr with GR!?? >>>>>>>>> =================TIA >>>>>>>>> Y.P >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> now Bod >>>>>>> it is your turn to listen to me : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> and I wil quote now myself in Google many years ago !! >>>>>>> 1 >>>>>>> remember the Edington experiment >>>>>>> about curved light near earth : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> that is where mistakes started : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1 >>>>>>> I was considered that light has no mass '' >>>>>>> I showed andproved an historic finding that >>>>>>> PHOTONS HAS MASS >>>>>>> THEONLY MASS >>>>>>> NOT RELATIVISTIC ANDNOT SHMELAIVISTIC MASS >>>>>>> by analyzing the formula >>>>>>> E photon-hf (plank ) >>>>>>> if you analyze the dimension of it >>>>>>> you find to your surprise that >>>>>>> the photon has mass >>>>>>> AND NOTHING TO MULTIPLY THAT MASS >>>>>>> NOT B ANHYTHING RELETIVISTIC COFICIENT !! >>>>>>> AND NOT BY zERO !! >>>>>>> SO >>>>>>> 2 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> in the Edington experiment >>>>>>> light was curving not because any f en curved space >>>>>>> but because photons has mass the only mass!! >>>>>>> and earth has mass !! >>>>>>> so light is curving next to earth >>>>>>> >>>>>>> E photon =hf remember >>>>>>> the Newtonian physic hat is serving NASA >>>>>>> and if em waves curve next to earth >>>>>>> there is a need for a whole net of satiates >>>>>>> to lead it around our globe >>>>>>> to be used at any point on earth >>>>>>> (look google >>>>>>> ''the real single photon mass and energy >>>>>>> by Y Porat >>>>>>> I heared about it by a guy called Y porat .. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> so >>>>>>> bottom line in short >>>>>>> em waves cure around our globe >>>>>>> not because of f en curved 'space >>>>>>> but because Newtonian physics >>>>>>> that NASA use >>>>>>> for its interstellar project >>>>>>> of sending a human being to mars !!!! >>>>>>> not because of f en curve space >>>>>>> but because mass is attracting mass >>>>>>> and if you don't mind >>>>>>> mass is the creator of**all forces including gravity >>>>>>> not curved space'' >>>>>>> it will be in future in your books >>>>>>> TIA >>>>>>> Y.Porat >>>>>>> ============> > TIA >>>>>>> Y.P >>>>>>> ==================> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Odd Bodkin Maker of fine toys, tools, tables >>>>> ==================dear ingenious Bodkin anonymous !! >>>>> >>>>> I unlike you -- am not just a parrot as you >>>>> I am a little more than a parrot as you >>>>> with my own creative mind !! >>>> >>>> It’s interesting that you justify not knowing a damn thing about relativity >>>> by claiming that knowledge would make you a parrot. >>>> >>>> You seem to favor being “creative” from a position of ignorance. As though >>>> that is a virtue. >>>> >>>>> so !! >>>>> if we think about the >>>>> 'EDINGTON' effect ''/experiment >>>>> in the 'Eddington effect' >>>>> the light em beam >>>>> is indeed curving NEXT TO earth >>>>> but that curvature is not **sharp enough ** >>>>> to follow curvature of earth all around !!!! >>>> >>>> Of course not. The calculation I did shows that. >>> >>> >>> ==== >>> show those calculations >>> and don't hand wave !! >> >> I did! You couldn’t follow them? Remember the sagitta? The chord? The >> radius of curvature and the relation between them? >> >> If you don’t remember what I told you just two days ago, then you mind has >> rotted past pointlessness. >> >>> >>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> need I have to go on with that explanation ?? >>>>> may be one of our **thinking ** readers**can guess and go on and >>>>> explain what is going on >>>>> with that experiment and current use of it >>>>> and why is it that we need >>>>> many** transmission stations to redirect the em beam >>>>> to curve*** ALL AROUND OUR** GLOBE ?? !! >>>> >>>> That’s not what’s going on. That’s not the reason there are so many >>>> satellites. Instead of finding out what the reason is, you make something >>>> up, with your “creative” mind. >>> >>> ==== >>> I showed yo parrot that even theortically >>> and experimentally >>> the Edington em wavs were only partially curving >>> around globe >>> but di t go on curving the globe >>> because >> >> No one expects it to! Curved space does not mean that objects follow the >> curve of that space to follow the curve of the surface!! The two curves >> have nothing to do with each other. Nothing! Shake the bad idea from your >> head! It’s flat wrong! >> >> Read what the theory actually says rather than making up bullshit about it. > = > =================== > since you are such a great expert of curved space > please tell us > how that curved space will look like > all around the masses involved in the > Edington experiment ?? I showed you how to do the calculation at the surface of the earth. Follow the same thing but use the mass and radius of the sun instead. Go ahead. It’s not hard. > > TIA > Y.Porat > =========================== >> >> >>> >>> your f en curved space >>> did not exist >>> all aground our globe !! >>> >>> and that partial deviation >>> we had >>> was because ordinary local interaction >>> between >>> mass of earth and mass of PHOTON !!! >>> and in that beeam going on >>> it dint find your f en curved space >>> >>> AND THEREFORE >>> CONTINUED IN A*** SYRIGHT LINE !!!! >>>> -- >> > -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-04 18:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <prneo9$1c9l$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #711259 |
Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> wrote: > <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 4:44:00 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 3:28:37 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 12:39:00 AM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 7:33:18 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>>> <y space !!! >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> space is nothing!! >>>>>>>>>>>>> and has no physical/Dimensions / properties >>>>>>>>>>>>> except length dimension -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> --that by itself cannot be detected >>>>>>>>>>>>> if no mass in it !!! >>>>>>>>>>>>> for me >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mass is the main ''hero ' of all physics >>>>>>>>>>>>> I was dwelling on it here along many years ! >>>>>>>>>>>>>> needed advance !! >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> NO ONE EVER USED IT FOR ANYTHING >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> now >>>>>>>>>>>>> what on earth another ** responsible project** we have >>>>>>>>>>>>> other than sending a human being to mars ??? >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2 >>>>>>>>>>>>> my alternative claim is that >>>>>>>>>>>>> even fantastical it looks in our days >>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>> ============================================> >> Mass** IS THE >>>>>>>>>>>>> CREAEOR OF **ALL**!! FORCES ---INCLUDING GRAVITY !!! >>>>>>>>>>>>> ==========================================> >> the Faraday ingenious >>>>>>>>>>>>> experiment with the permanent magnet 100yesre ago !!! >>>>>>>>>>>>> was the first TABGIBLE clue to it !! >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> unprecedented !! >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ===================================> >> TIA (humbly ) >>>>>>>>>>>>> Eng >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yehiel Porat >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2/11/2018 >>>>>>>>>>>>> =====================> > now >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> odd Bodkin (anonymous)!! >>>>>>>>>>>> wanted to cheat us >>>>>>>>>>>> by saying that: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> GPS is using 'curved space' physics >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> so what do you think about it ? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> TIA >>>>>>>>>>>> Y.Porat >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ===================> > >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> indeed you are better than me in searching >>>>>>>>>> the net >>>>>>>>>> now >>>>>>>>>> please note >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> the GPS system is based on a **thick net**of satellites >>>>>>>>>> SURROUND ALL OUR GLOBE !! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> if space is curved >>>>>>>>>> why do we need ALL THAT THICK NET OF SATTELITES !! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Can you at least go to www.wikipedia.org and read the article on GPS? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> IF SPACE WAS CURVEED THE EM WAVES >>>>>>>>>> WOULD FOOW THE SATTELITES >>>>>>>>>> EVEN IF NOT 'SISED BY SIDE !! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No. You have the mistaken impression that any object at that elevation at >>>>>>>>> any speed would follow the same orbits as the satellites. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You have a FUNDAMENTALLY poor understanding of what curved space means. It >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> =========================I am happy that I don't know that f en theory >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Your choice. But it s stupid to criticize something you literally know >>>>>>> nothing about. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> doesn t mean that objects at that height all follow the curved track of >>>>>>>>> curved spacetime. THAT S NOT WHAT IT MEANS! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> but run around ''curved space' that is; actualy >>>>>>>>>> not space but just our globe that is curved !~~ globe >>>>>>>>>> that is curved !!!with no need of all that side by side net >>>>>>>>>> probably >>>>>>>>>> with relative short distance straight lines !! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Pay attention. The curvature of the surface of the earth has NOTHING to do >>>>>>>>> with the curvature of spacetime at the earth s surface. The radius of >>>>>>>> ===============really ?? >>>>>>>> why >>>>>>>> because you are playing chess with yourself ?? >>>>>>>> =====> curvature of spacetime near the earth s surface is 31 million billion feet. >>>>>>>> (:-) >>>>>>>> waw !!it is very impressive >>>>>>>> why not 32 billion feet ??? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I showed you how to do the calculation from measured, everyday numbers. You >>>>>>> couldn t follow it, could you? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> e earth s surface is 21 million feet. Do those >>>>>>>>> look like the same numbers to you!?! >>>>>>>>> ===============it looks as witches on a broom & >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Anything over someone s head looks like magic to them. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> em waves do not move in curved lines ?!! >>>>>>>>>> they move in straight lines >>>>>>>>>> and therefore there is the need of >>>>>>>>>> an >>>>>>>>>> eye to eye system !! >>>>>>>>>> not because curved space !! >>>>>>>>>> but curved globe >>>>>>>>>> 2 >>>>>>>>>> I indicated that >>>>>>>>>> even according to my understanding >>>>>>>>>> SR is right !!! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> so SR calculations are needed !! >>>>>>>>>> and i understand it >>>>>>>>>> but not >>>>>>>>>> Gr calculations >>>>>>>>>> we have to find out >>>>>>>>>> if they use >>>>>>>>>> GR calculations >>>>>>>>>> or may be >>>>>>>>>> just SR calculations >>>>>>>>>> and it is their mistake to mix >>>>>>>>>> Sr >>>>>>>>>> with GR ?? >>>>>>>>>> we have to ask >>>>>>>>>> the real people >>>>>>>>>> who did it >>>>>>>>>> 'with their hands'' >>>>>>>>>> and not from ones that just'' heard' about it and were mixing >>>>>>>>>> Sr with GR!?? >>>>>>>>>> =================TIA >>>>>>>>>> Y.P >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> now Bod >>>>>>>> it is your turn to listen to me : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> and I wil quote now myself in Google many years ago !! >>>>>>>> 1 >>>>>>>> remember the Edington experiment >>>>>>>> about curved light near earth : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> that is where mistakes started : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 1 >>>>>>>> I was considered that light has no mass '' >>>>>>>> I showed andproved an historic finding that >>>>>>>> PHOTONS HAS MASS >>>>>>>> THEONLY MASS >>>>>>>> NOT RELATIVISTIC ANDNOT SHMELAIVISTIC MASS >>>>>>>> by analyzing the formula >>>>>>>> E photon-hf (plank ) >>>>>>>> if you analyze the dimension of it >>>>>>>> you find to your surprise that >>>>>>>> the photon has mass >>>>>>>> AND NOTHING TO MULTIPLY THAT MASS >>>>>>>> NOT B ANHYTHING RELETIVISTIC COFICIENT !! >>>>>>>> AND NOT BY zERO !! >>>>>>>> SO >>>>>>>> 2 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> in the Edington experiment >>>>>>>> light was curving not because any f en curved space >>>>>>>> but because photons has mass the only mass!! >>>>>>>> and earth has mass !! >>>>>>>> so light is curving next to earth >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> E photon =hf remember >>>>>>>> the Newtonian physic hat is serving NASA >>>>>>>> and if em waves curve next to earth >>>>>>>> there is a need for a whole net of satiates >>>>>>>> to lead it around our globe >>>>>>>> to be used at any point on earth >>>>>>>> (look google >>>>>>>> ''the real single photon mass and energy >>>>>>>> by Y Porat >>>>>>>> I heared about it by a guy called Y porat .. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> so >>>>>>>> bottom line in short >>>>>>>> em waves cure around our globe >>>>>>>> not because of f en curved 'space >>>>>>>> but because Newtonian physics >>>>>>>> that NASA use >>>>>>>> for its interstellar project >>>>>>>> of sending a human being to mars !!!! >>>>>>>> not because of f en curve space >>>>>>>> but because mass is attracting mass >>>>>>>> and if you don't mind >>>>>>>> mass is the creator of**all forces including gravity >>>>>>>> not curved space'' >>>>>>>> it will be in future in your books >>>>>>>> TIA >>>>>>>> Y.Porat >>>>>>>> ============> > TIA >>>>>>>> Y.P >>>>>>>> ==================> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Odd Bodkin Maker of fine toys, tools, tables >>>>>> ==================dear ingenious Bodkin anonymous !! >>>>>> >>>>>> I unlike you -- am not just a parrot as you >>>>>> I am a little more than a parrot as you >>>>>> with my own creative mind !! >>>>> >>>>> It’s interesting that you justify not knowing a damn thing about relativity >>>>> by claiming that knowledge would make you a parrot. >>>>> >>>>> You seem to favor being “creative” from a position of ignorance. As though >>>>> that is a virtue. >>>>> >>>>>> so !! >>>>>> if we think about the >>>>>> 'EDINGTON' effect ''/experiment >>>>>> in the 'Eddington effect' >>>>>> the light em beam >>>>>> is indeed curving NEXT TO earth >>>>>> but that curvature is not **sharp enough ** >>>>>> to follow curvature of earth all around !!!! >>>>> >>>>> Of course not. The calculation I did shows that. >>>> >>>> >>>> ==== >>>> show those calculations >>>> and don't hand wave !! >>> >>> I did! You couldn’t follow them? Remember the sagitta? The chord? The >>> radius of curvature and the relation between them? >>> >>> If you don’t remember what I told you just two days ago, then you mind has >>> rotted past pointlessness. >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> need I have to go on with that explanation ?? >>>>>> may be one of our **thinking ** readers**can guess and go on and >>>>>> explain what is going on >>>>>> with that experiment and current use of it >>>>>> and why is it that we need >>>>>> many** transmission stations to redirect the em beam >>>>>> to curve*** ALL AROUND OUR** GLOBE ?? !! >>>>> >>>>> That’s not what’s going on. That’s not the reason there are so many >>>>> satellites. Instead of finding out what the reason is, you make something >>>>> up, with your “creative” mind. >>>> >>>> ==== >>>> I showed yo parrot that even theortically >>>> and experimentally >>>> the Edington em wavs were only partially curving >>>> around globe >>>> but di t go on curving the globe >>>> because >>> >>> No one expects it to! Curved space does not mean that objects follow the >>> curve of that space to follow the curve of the surface!! The two curves >>> have nothing to do with each other. Nothing! Shake the bad idea from your >>> head! It’s flat wrong! >>> >>> Read what the theory actually says rather than making up bullshit about it. >> = >> =================== >> since you are such a great expert of curved space >> please tell us >> how that curved space will look like >> all around the masses involved in the >> Edington experiment ?? > > I showed you how to do the calculation at the surface of the earth. Follow > the same thing but use the mass and radius of the sun instead. Go ahead. > It’s not hard. Silence from Porat. Or rather, a quick change of subject. > >> >> TIA >> Y.Porat >> =========================== >>> >>> >>>> >>>> your f en curved space >>>> did not exist >>>> all aground our globe !! >>>> >>>> and that partial deviation >>>> we had >>>> was because ordinary local interaction >>>> between >>>> mass of earth and mass of PHOTON !!! >>>> and in that beeam going on >>>> it dint find your f en curved space >>>> >>>> AND THEREFORE >>>> CONTINUED IN A*** SYRIGHT LINE !!!! >>>>> -- >>> >> > > > -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | yporat08@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-05 02:59 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <830b8b00-fb2e-4846-9c3c-8ef7ff19f109@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #711488 |
On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 8:45:34 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> wrote:
> > <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 4:44:00 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> >>> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 3:28:37 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> >>>>> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 12:39:00 AM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> >>>>>>> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 7:33:18 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> <y space !!!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> space is nothing!!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and has no physical/Dimensions / properties
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> except length dimension --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> --that by itself cannot be detected
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> if no mass in it !!!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> for me
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mass is the main ''hero ' of all physics
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I was dwelling on it here along many years !
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> needed advance !!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> NO ONE EVER USED IT FOR ANYTHING
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> now
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> what on earth another ** responsible project** we have
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> other than sending a human being to mars ???
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> my alternative claim is that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> even fantastical it looks in our days
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ============================================> >> Mass** IS THE
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> CREAEOR OF **ALL**!! FORCES ---INCLUDING GRAVITY !!!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ==========================================> >> the Faraday ingenious
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> experiment with the permanent magnet 100yesre ago !!!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> was the first TABGIBLE clue to it !!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> unprecedented !!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ===================================> >> TIA (humbly )
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Eng
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yehiel Porat
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2/11/2018
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> =====================> > now
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> odd Bodkin (anonymous)!!
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wanted to cheat us
> >>>>>>>>>>>> by saying that:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> GPS is using 'curved space' physics
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> so what do you think about it ?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> TIA
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Y.Porat
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> ===================> >
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> indeed you are better than me in searching
> >>>>>>>>>> the net
> >>>>>>>>>> now
> >>>>>>>>>> please note
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> the GPS system is based on a **thick net**of satellites
> >>>>>>>>>> SURROUND ALL OUR GLOBE !!
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> if space is curved
> >>>>>>>>>> why do we need ALL THAT THICK NET OF SATTELITES !!
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Can you at least go to www.wikipedia.org and read the article on GPS?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> IF SPACE WAS CURVEED THE EM WAVES
> >>>>>>>>>> WOULD FOOW THE SATTELITES
> >>>>>>>>>> EVEN IF NOT 'SISED BY SIDE !!
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> No. You have the mistaken impression that any object at that elevation at
> >>>>>>>>> any speed would follow the same orbits as the satellites.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> You have a FUNDAMENTALLY poor understanding of what curved space means. It
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> =========================I am happy that I don't know that f en theory
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Your choice. But it s stupid to criticize something you literally know
> >>>>>>> nothing about.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> doesn t mean that objects at that height all follow the curved track of
> >>>>>>>>> curved spacetime. THAT S NOT WHAT IT MEANS!
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> but run around ''curved space' that is; actualy
> >>>>>>>>>> not space but just our globe that is curved !~~ globe
> >>>>>>>>>> that is curved !!!with no need of all that side by side net
> >>>>>>>>>> probably
> >>>>>>>>>> with relative short distance straight lines !!
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Pay attention. The curvature of the surface of the earth has NOTHING to do
> >>>>>>>>> with the curvature of spacetime at the earth s surface. The radius of
> >>>>>>>> ===============really ??
> >>>>>>>> why
> >>>>>>>> because you are playing chess with yourself ??
> >>>>>>>> =====> curvature of spacetime near the earth s surface is 31 million billion feet.
> >>>>>>>> (:-)
> >>>>>>>> waw !!it is very impressive
> >>>>>>>> why not 32 billion feet ???
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I showed you how to do the calculation from measured, everyday numbers. You
> >>>>>>> couldn t follow it, could you?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> e earth s surface is 21 million feet. Do those
> >>>>>>>>> look like the same numbers to you!?!
> >>>>>>>>> ===============it looks as witches on a broom &
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Anything over someone s head looks like magic to them.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> em waves do not move in curved lines ?!!
> >>>>>>>>>> they move in straight lines
> >>>>>>>>>> and therefore there is the need of
> >>>>>>>>>> an
> >>>>>>>>>> eye to eye system !!
> >>>>>>>>>> not because curved space !!
> >>>>>>>>>> but curved globe
> >>>>>>>>>> 2
> >>>>>>>>>> I indicated that
> >>>>>>>>>> even according to my understanding
> >>>>>>>>>> SR is right !!!
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> so SR calculations are needed !!
> >>>>>>>>>> and i understand it
> >>>>>>>>>> but not
> >>>>>>>>>> Gr calculations
> >>>>>>>>>> we have to find out
> >>>>>>>>>> if they use
> >>>>>>>>>> GR calculations
> >>>>>>>>>> or may be
> >>>>>>>>>> just SR calculations
> >>>>>>>>>> and it is their mistake to mix
> >>>>>>>>>> Sr
> >>>>>>>>>> with GR ??
> >>>>>>>>>> we have to ask
> >>>>>>>>>> the real people
> >>>>>>>>>> who did it
> >>>>>>>>>> 'with their hands''
> >>>>>>>>>> and not from ones that just'' heard' about it and were mixing
> >>>>>>>>>> Sr with GR!??
> >>>>>>>>>> =================TIA
> >>>>>>>>>> Y.P
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> now Bod
> >>>>>>>> it is your turn to listen to me :
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> and I wil quote now myself in Google many years ago !!
> >>>>>>>> 1
> >>>>>>>> remember the Edington experiment
> >>>>>>>> about curved light near earth :
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> that is where mistakes started :
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 1
> >>>>>>>> I was considered that light has no mass ''
> >>>>>>>> I showed andproved an historic finding that
> >>>>>>>> PHOTONS HAS MASS
> >>>>>>>> THEONLY MASS
> >>>>>>>> NOT RELATIVISTIC ANDNOT SHMELAIVISTIC MASS
> >>>>>>>> by analyzing the formula
> >>>>>>>> E photon-hf (plank )
> >>>>>>>> if you analyze the dimension of it
> >>>>>>>> you find to your surprise that
> >>>>>>>> the photon has mass
> >>>>>>>> AND NOTHING TO MULTIPLY THAT MASS
> >>>>>>>> NOT B ANHYTHING RELETIVISTIC COFICIENT !!
> >>>>>>>> AND NOT BY zERO !!
> >>>>>>>> SO
> >>>>>>>> 2
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> in the Edington experiment
> >>>>>>>> light was curving not because any f en curved space
> >>>>>>>> but because photons has mass the only mass!!
> >>>>>>>> and earth has mass !!
> >>>>>>>> so light is curving next to earth
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> E photon =hf remember
> >>>>>>>> the Newtonian physic hat is serving NASA
> >>>>>>>> and if em waves curve next to earth
> >>>>>>>> there is a need for a whole net of satiates
> >>>>>>>> to lead it around our globe
> >>>>>>>> to be used at any point on earth
> >>>>>>>> (look google
> >>>>>>>> ''the real single photon mass and energy
> >>>>>>>> by Y Porat
> >>>>>>>> I heared about it by a guy called Y porat ..
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> so
> >>>>>>>> bottom line in short
> >>>>>>>> em waves cure around our globe
> >>>>>>>> not because of f en curved 'space
> >>>>>>>> but because Newtonian physics
> >>>>>>>> that NASA use
> >>>>>>>> for its interstellar project
> >>>>>>>> of sending a human being to mars !!!!
> >>>>>>>> not because of f en curve space
> >>>>>>>> but because mass is attracting mass
> >>>>>>>> and if you don't mind
> >>>>>>>> mass is the creator of**all forces including gravity
> >>>>>>>> not curved space''
> >>>>>>>> it will be in future in your books
> >>>>>>>> TIA
> >>>>>>>> Y.Porat
> >>>>>>>> ============> > TIA
> >>>>>>>> Y.P
> >>>>>>>> ==================>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> Odd Bodkin Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> >>>>>> ==================dear ingenious Bodkin anonymous !!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I unlike you -- am not just a parrot as you
> >>>>>> I am a little more than a parrot as you
> >>>>>> with my own creative mind !!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It’s interesting that you justify not knowing a damn thing about relativity
> >>>>> by claiming that knowledge would make you a parrot.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You seem to favor being “creative” from a position of ignorance. As though
> >>>>> that is a virtue.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> so !!
> >>>>>> if we think about the
> >>>>>> 'EDINGTON' effect ''/experiment
> >>>>>> in the 'Eddington effect'
> >>>>>> the light em beam
> >>>>>> is indeed curving NEXT TO earth
> >>>>>> but that curvature is not **sharp enough **
> >>>>>> to follow curvature of earth all around !!!!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Of course not. The calculation I did shows that.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ====
> >>>> show those calculations
> >>>> and don't hand wave !!
> >>>
> >>> I did! You couldn’t follow them? Remember the sagitta? The chord? The
> >>> radius of curvature and the relation between them?
> >>>
> >>> If you don’t remember what I told you just two days ago, then you mind has
> >>> rotted past pointlessness.
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> need I have to go on with that explanation ??
> >>>>>> may be one of our **thinking ** readers**can guess and go on and
> >>>>>> explain what is going on
> >>>>>> with that experiment and current use of it
> >>>>>> and why is it that we need
> >>>>>> many** transmission stations to redirect the em beam
> >>>>>> to curve*** ALL AROUND OUR** GLOBE ?? !!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> That’s not what’s going on. That’s not the reason there are so many
> >>>>> satellites. Instead of finding out what the reason is, you make something
> >>>>> up, with your “creative” mind.
> >>>>
> >>>> ====
> >>>> I showed yo parrot that even theortically
> >>>> and experimentally
> >>>> the Edington em wavs were only partially curving
> >>>> around globe
> >>>> but di t go on curving the globe
> >>>> because
> >>>
> >>> No one expects it to! Curved space does not mean that objects follow the
> >>> curve of that space to follow the curve of the surface!! The two curves
> >>> have nothing to do with each other. Nothing!
====================================
all I say is that
em waves move in straight line (unless )/
only if mass is next to it
and then that /some mass is diverting/curving the path of em movement
if you like
==curving that path of em
that does not happen without action of mass on them
iow
no mass-- no curved movement of em waves
or even of another mass
and
even not by
f en 'curved space''
curved space is only in the imagination of Einstein & co
==============
TIA
Y.P
===========================
s
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rick Jones <RJones1993@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-05 06:17 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <prpjeh$r97$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #711617 |
Learn English idiot
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | yporat08@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-03 08:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <38bed60b-e44e-4cac-a5af-45f26753ad60@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #711224 |
On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 4:30:46 PM UTC+2, ypor...@gmail.com wrote: > On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 3:28:37 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 12:39:00 AM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > >> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 7:33:18 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > >>>> <y space !!! > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> space is nothing!! > > >>>>>>>> and has no physical/Dimensions / properties > > >>>>>>>> except length dimension -- > > >>>>>>>> --that by itself cannot be detected > > >>>>>>>> if no mass in it !!! > > >>>>>>>> for me > > >>>>>>>> Mass is the main ''hero ' of all physics > > >>>>>>>> I was dwelling on it here along many years ! > > >>>>>>>>> needed advance !! > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> NO ONE EVER USED IT FOR ANYTHING > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> now > > >>>>>>>> what on earth another ** responsible project** we have > > >>>>>>>> other than sending a human being to mars ??? > > >>>>>>>> 2 > > >>>>>>>> my alternative claim is that > > >>>>>>>> even fantastical it looks in our days > > >>>>>>>> that > > >>>>>>>> ============================================> >> Mass** IS THE > > >>>>>>>> CREAEOR OF **ALL**!! FORCES ---INCLUDING GRAVITY !!! > > >>>>>>>> ==========================================> >> the Faraday ingenious > > >>>>>>>> experiment with the permanent magnet 100yesre ago !!! > > >>>>>>>> was the first TABGIBLE clue to it !! > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> unprecedented !! > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> ===================================> >> TIA (humbly ) > > >>>>>>>> Eng > > >>>>>>>> Yehiel Porat > > >>>>>>>> 2/11/2018 > > >>>>>>>> =====================> > now > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> odd Bodkin (anonymous)!! > > >>>>>>> wanted to cheat us > > >>>>>>> by saying that: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> GPS is using 'curved space' physics > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> so what do you think about it ? > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> TIA > > >>>>>>> Y.Porat > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> ===================> > > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> indeed you are better than me in searching > > >>>>> the net > > >>>>> now > > >>>>> please note > > >>>>> > > >>>>> the GPS system is based on a **thick net**of satellites SURROUND ALL OUR GLOBE !! > > >>>>> > > >>>>> if space is curved > > >>>>> why do we need ALL THAT THICK NET OF SATTELITES !! > > >>>> > > >>>> Can you at least go to www.wikipedia.org and read the article on GPS? > > >>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> IF SPACE WAS CURVEED THE EM WAVES > > >>>>> WOULD FOOW THE SATTELITES > > >>>>> EVEN IF NOT 'SISED BY SIDE !! > > >>>> > > >>>> No. You have the mistaken impression that any object at that elevation at > > >>>> any speed would follow the same orbits as the satellites. > > >>>> > > >>>> You have a FUNDAMENTALLY poor understanding of what curved space means. It > > >>> > > >>> =========================I am happy that I don't know that f en theory > > >> > > >> Your choice. But it s stupid to criticize something you literally know > > >> nothing about. > > >> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>> doesn t mean that objects at that height all follow the curved track of > > >>>> curved spacetime. THAT S NOT WHAT IT MEANS! > > >>>> > > >>>>> but run around ''curved space' that is; actualy > > >>>>> not space but just our globe that is curved !~~ globe > > >>>>> that is curved !!!with no need of all that side by side net > > >>>>> probably > > >>>>> with relative short distance straight lines !! > > >>>> > > >>>> Pay attention. The curvature of the surface of the earth has NOTHING to do > > >>>> with the curvature of spacetime at the earth s surface. The radius of > > >>> ===============really ?? > > >>> why > > >>> because you are playing chess with yourself ?? > > >>> =====> curvature of spacetime near the earth s surface is 31 million billion feet. > > >>> (:-) > > >>> waw !!it is very impressive > > >>> why not 32 billion feet ??? > > >> > > >> I showed you how to do the calculation from measured, everyday numbers. You > > >> couldn t follow it, could you? > > >> > > >>> > > >>> e earth s surface is 21 million feet. Do those > > >>>> look like the same numbers to you!?! > > >>>> ===============it looks as witches on a broom & > > >> > > >> Anything over someone s head looks like magic to them. > > >> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>>> em waves do not move in curved lines ?!! > > >>>>> they move in straight lines > > >>>>> and therefore there is the need of > > >>>>> an > > >>>>> eye to eye system !! > > >>>>> not because curved space !! > > >>>>> but curved globe > > >>>>> 2 > > >>>>> I indicated that > > >>>>> even according to my understanding > > >>>>> SR is right !!! > > >>>>> > > >>>>> so SR calculations are needed !! > > >>>>> and i understand it > > >>>>> but not > > >>>>> Gr calculations > > >>>>> we have to find out > > >>>>> if they use > > >>>>> GR calculations > > >>>>> or may be > > >>>>> just SR calculations > > >>>>> and it is their mistake to mix > > >>>>> Sr > > >>>>> with GR ?? > > >>>>> we have to ask > > >>>>> the real people > > >>>>> who did it > > >>>>> 'with their hands'' > > >>>>> and not from ones that just'' heard' about it and were mixing > > >>>>> Sr with GR!?? > > >>>>> =================TIA > > >>>>> Y.P > > >>>>> > > >>> > > >>> now Bod > > >>> it is your turn to listen to me : > > >>> > > >>> and I wil quote now myself in Google many years ago !! > > >>> 1 > > >>> remember the Edington experiment > > >>> about curved light near earth : > > >>> > > >>> that is where mistakes started : > > >>> > > >>> 1 > > >>> I was considered that light has no mass '' > > >>> I showed andproved an historic finding that > > >>> PHOTONS HAS MASS > > >>> THEONLY MASS > > >>> NOT RELATIVISTIC ANDNOT SHMELAIVISTIC MASS > > >>> by analyzing the formula > > >>> E photon-hf (plank ) > > >>> if you analyze the dimension of it > > >>> you find to your surprise that > > >>> the photon has mass > > >>> AND NOTHING TO MULTIPLY THAT MASS > > >>> NOT B ANHYTHING RELETIVISTIC COFICIENT !! > > >>> AND NOT BY zERO !! > > >>> SO > > >>> 2 > > >>> > > >>> in the Edington experiment > > >>> light was curving not because any f en curved space > > >>> but because photons has mass the only mass!! > > >>> and earth has mass !! > > >>> so light is curving next to earth > > >>> > > >>> E photon =hf remember > > >>> the Newtonian physic hat is serving NASA > > >>> and if em waves curve next to earth > > >>> there is a need for a whole net of satiates > > >>> to lead it around our globe > > >>> to be used at any point on earth > > >>> (look google > > >>> ''the real single photon mass and energy > > >>> by Y Porat > > >>> I heared about it by a guy called Y porat .. > > >>> > > >>> so > > >>> bottom line in short > > >>> em waves cure around our globe > > >>> not because of f en curved 'space > > >>> but because Newtonian physics > > >>> that NASA use > > >>> for its interstellar project > > >>> of sending a human being to mars !!!! > > >>> not because of f en curve space > > >>> but because mass is attracting mass > > >>> and if you don't mind > > >>> mass is the creator of**all forces including gravity > > >>> not curved space'' > > >>> it will be in future in your books > > >>> TIA > > >>> Y.Porat > > >>> ============> > TIA > > >>> Y.P > > >>> ==================> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Odd Bodkin Maker of fine toys, tools, tables > > > ==================dear ingenious Bodkin anonymous !! > > > > > > I unlike you -- am not just a parrot as you > > > I am a little more than a parrot as you > > > with my own creative mind !! > > > > It’s interesting that you justify not knowing a damn thing about relativity > > by claiming that knowledge would make you a parrot. > > > > You seem to favor being “creative” from a position of ignorance. As though > > that is a virtue. > > > > > so !! > > > if we think about the > > > 'EDINGTON' effect ''/experiment > > > in the 'Eddington effect' > > > the light em beam > > > is indeed curving NEXT TO earth > > > but that curvature is not **sharp enough ** > > > to follow curvature of earth all around !!!! > > > > Of course not. The calculation I did shows that. > > > ==== > show those calculations > and don't hand wave !! > > > > > > > > > > need I have to go on with that explanation ?? > > > may be one of our **thinking ** readers**can guess and go on and > > > explain what is going on > > > with that experiment and current use of it > > > and why is it that we need > > > many** transmission stations to redirect the em beam > > > to curve*** ALL AROUND OUR** GLOBE ?? !! > > > > That’s not what’s going on. That’s not the reason there are so many > > satellites. Instead of finding out what the reason is, you make something > > up, with your “creative” mind. > > ==== > I showed yo parrot that even theortically > and experimentally > the Edington em wavs were only partially curving > around globe > but di t go on curving the globe > because > > your f en curved space > did not exist > all aground our globe !! > > and that partial deviation > we had > was because ordinary local interaction > between > mass of earth and mass of PHOTON !!! > and in that beeam going on > it dint find your f en curved space > > AND THEREFORE > CONTINUED IN A*** SYRIGHT LINE !!!! > got it idiot > why went on straight line > while your f en curved space > is ''said to exist '' > all around our globe !!! > is does not saied to '' exist '' ***only*t the above that specific location > but '''all around our globe !! > and I did not occur in practice !! > > got it parrot > > TIA > Y.P > ============================= sorry typo o recall that the light in the Edington experiment curved next to another plane of our planets (not sround our globe but the concussions are the same as I indicated above TIA Y.Porat ================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "I. Seymour Butts" <invalid@example.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-03 13:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <prl09g$1ll9$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #711232 |
Double-idiot.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | yporat08@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-10 23:56 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <98aecb74-8d80-4124-a9b9-11a84f11f38f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #711031 |
On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 7:33:18 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: > <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 5:46:08 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 9:37:40 AM UTC+2, ypor...@gmail.com wrote: > >>>> There is no curvature and no 'schmervature ' of space !!! > >>>> > >>>> space is nothing!! > >>>> and has no physical/Dimensions / properties > >>>> except length dimension -- > >>>> --that by itself cannot be detected > >>>> if no mass in it !!! > >>>> for me > >>>> Mass is the main ''hero ' of all physics > >>>> I was dwelling on it here along many years ! > >>>> > >>>> that does not to say that > >>>> I AM not A GREAT ADMIRER OF EINSTEIN !! > >>>> FOR > >>>> his > >>>> E=mc^2 > >>>> > >>>> for his photoelectric findings > >>>> and his SR!! > >>>> that is as well right !!!! > >>>> > >>>> ==================================> >> but > >>>> Einstein was only a human being > >>>> not an Angle from heaven > >>>> and > >>>> 'Hominum -errata est'' (spell ??in Roman > >>>> ====== > >>>> now > >>>> if!! he was wrong about 'curved space' > >>>> just imagine!! the damage it was causing > >>>> along more than 100 years !! > >>>> by preventing / ''screening'' some > >>>> other real > >>>> needed advance !! > >>>> > >>>> NO ONE EVER USED IT FOR ANYTHING > >>>> > >>>> not to speak about PRACTICAL USES > >>>> even NASSA by its interstellar projects > >>>> (to send a human being to Mars!!! > >>>> does no use it!! > >>>> except > >>>> the ordinary Newtonian physics !! > >>>> now > >>>> what on earth another ** responsible project** we have > >>>> other than sending a human being to mars ??? > >>>> 2 > >>>> my alternative claim is that > >>>> even fantastical it looks in our days > >>>> that > >>>> ============================================> >> Mass** IS THE > >>>> CREAEOR OF **ALL**!! FORCES ---INCLUDING GRAVITY !!! > >>>> ==========================================> >> the Faraday ingenious > >>>> experiment with the permanent magnet 100yesre ago !!! > >>>> was the first TABGIBLE clue to it !! > >>>> > >>>> unprecedented !! > >>>> > >>>> ===================================> >> TIA (humbly ) > >>>> Eng > >>>> Yehiel Porat > >>>> 2/11/2018 > >>>> =====================> > now > >>> > >>> odd Bodkin (anonymous)!! > >>> wanted to cheat us > >>> by saying that: > >>> > >>> GPS is using 'curved space' physics > >>> > >>> so what do you think about it ? > >>> > >>> TIA > >>> Y.Porat > >>> > >>> ===================> > > >> > >> I somehow knew you were incapable of doing a simple Google search, and that > >> your ONLY recourse is to ask people here for help. Doesn t this embarrass > >> you a little? > >> http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast162/Unit5/gps.html > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Odd Bodkin Maker of fine toys, tools, tables > > > > ========================thank you Bodkin > > indeed you are better than me in searching > > the net > > now > > please note > > > > the GPS system is based on a **thick net**of satellites SURROUND ALL OUR GLOBE !! > > > > if space is curved > > why do we need ALL THAT THICK NET OF SATTELITES !! > > Can you at least go to www.wikipedia.org and read the article on GPS? > > > > > IF SPACE WAS CURVEED THE EM WAVES > > WOULD FOOW THE SATTELITES > > EVEN IF NOT 'SISED BY SIDE !! > > No. You have the mistaken impression that any object at that elevation at > any speed would follow the same orbits as the satellites. > > You have a FUNDAMENTALLY poor understanding of what curved space means. It > doesn’t mean that objects at that height all follow the curved track of > curved spacetime. THAT’S NOT WHAT IT MEANS! > > > but run around ''curved space' that is; actualy > > not space but just our globe that is curved !~~ globe > > that is curved !!!with no need of all that side by side net > > probably > > with relative short distance straight lines !! > > Pay attention. The curvature of the surface of the earth has NOTHING to do > with the curvature of spacetime at the earth’s surface. The radius of > curvature of spacetime near the earth’s surface is 31 million billion feet. > The radius of curvature of the earth’s surface is 21 million feet. Do those > look like the same numbers to you!?! > > > > > em waves do not move in curved lines ?!! > > they move in straight lines > > and therefore there is the need of > > an > > eye to eye system !! > > not because curved space !! > > but curved globe > > 2 > > I indicated that > > even according to my understanding > > SR is right !!! > > > > so SR calculations are needed !! > > and i understand it > > but not > > Gr calculations > > we have to find out > > if they use > > GR calculations > > or may be > > just SR calculations > > and it is their mistake to mix > > Sr > > with GR ?? > > we have to ask > > the real people > > who did it > > 'with their hands'' > > and not from ones that just'' heard' about it and were mixing > > Sr with GR!?? > > =================TIA > > Y.P > > ============== I told you parrot you and Einstein can plat with your curves space lines as much as you like and all night but the fact is that prcticslly GPs is using a thick net of eye to eye (do you understand what is eye tO eye system AMD WHY SO?? BECUSE IN THAT CASE A ***STRIGHT LINE PATH*** IS NEEDED !! GOT IT CURELESS PAERRROT ??? THAT IS PRACTICE FACTS ?? NOT nice dream at might !!!! TIA Y.P ============================== > > > > > > > > > > > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 4 [1] 2 3 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web