Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #553795 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-17 07:58 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-02-22 18:59 +0100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 309 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-17 07:58 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 10:38 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-17 19:31 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-17 11:55 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 14:04 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-17 12:11 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 07:25 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 01:44 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 09:46 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 07:57 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-18 15:18 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 10:22 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 08:33 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 21:20 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 13:36 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 14:03 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-17 12:11 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 07:20 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-17 11:45 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-17 09:17 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-17 17:23 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 12:35 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-17 19:54 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-17 12:10 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-17 16:19 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-17 13:41 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 16:55 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 06:36 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 18:35 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-18 19:08 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 20:57 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 22:58 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-19 06:32 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-18 23:50 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-19 10:09 -0600
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-19 11:13 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 09:31 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 10:45 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-19 17:58 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 10:12 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 11:19 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-19 19:31 -0600
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 11:14 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-19 13:17 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-19 18:46 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 12:17 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 10:17 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-19 19:24 -0600
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-19 20:29 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-19 19:46 -0600
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 17:48 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-19 20:58 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 21:07 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 20:09 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-20 12:09 -0600
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:59 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 01:38 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 22:52 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 19:06 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 13:24 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 11:30 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-20 10:55 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 12:36 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 22:22 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 23:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 18:19 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-20 16:18 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-21 06:05 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-21 16:00 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 06:09 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-27 01:51 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-26 23:38 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 19:37 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-27 11:48 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 02:14 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-27 23:47 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-28 10:22 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-28 22:57 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-28 07:23 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:08 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 10:23 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 18:54 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-29 02:11 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 11:24 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-28 13:59 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-28 11:16 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 14:26 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-28 11:28 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-28 19:30 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-28 14:57 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-29 03:30 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:28 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 01:51 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 19:03 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 23:00 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 06:13 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:11 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-01 09:55 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:45 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 21:05 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 13:40 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 16:06 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:05 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 11:23 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 14:09 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:13 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 01:36 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 18:19 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 12:35 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 06:24 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 07:50 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 20:28 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 13:39 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 07:15 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 16:16 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 08:21 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 07:40 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-28 13:56 -0500
Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 14:11 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:33 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 01:58 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 17:30 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-29 09:46 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:33 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 18:04 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 08:28 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 19:32 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:50 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 16:10 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 16:29 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:00 +0100
Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:30 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:13 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 23:45 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 20:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 23:01 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 05:41 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 00:08 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-29 21:33 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 07:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:24 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 12:25 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 12:51 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-01 10:38 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 21:58 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 16:27 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 07:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 01:52 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 18:59 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 20:44 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 13:38 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 16:17 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-01 13:50 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 15:06 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-01 16:08 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 17:13 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 23:37 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:45 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 01:04 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 18:16 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:24 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-02 00:26 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 18:42 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-02 12:32 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-02 11:50 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 06:52 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 07:40 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 08:05 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:26 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-01 09:59 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 19:26 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 13:40 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:55 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 16:02 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:12 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 00:48 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:12 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 00:48 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 19:40 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 14:47 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 15:31 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 15:45 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-02 12:47 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 16:57 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-02 17:46 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-03-02 21:21 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 22:33 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-03-02 22:54 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 23:48 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 22:31 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-02 20:47 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 23:52 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-02 20:57 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-03 00:15 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 06:41 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 08:54 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-03 13:17 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-04 03:44 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa liquid <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-03 22:29 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:52 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:30 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-03-01 00:14 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 20:18 +0100
Fakey see's the light. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 13:34 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 05:46 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 08:44 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 06:46 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 06:45 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:33 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 06:19 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-27 01:55 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-26 23:48 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-27 04:41 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-27 04:10 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-27 07:23 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-27 12:57 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 21:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 19:48 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-27 12:18 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 19:15 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-27 11:41 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 20:48 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-27 13:07 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:00 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 11:22 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-28 11:13 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-28 19:16 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:23 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 14:14 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-28 14:17 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-28 11:26 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-29 12:38 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:23 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 01:46 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 17:20 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 12:00 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 18:19 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-29 10:47 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-29 11:13 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-29 19:41 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-01 04:06 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 02:17 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:58 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 12:13 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-22 05:30 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-21 16:42 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-22 05:47 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-17 20:05 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 22:39 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. mariposas rand mair fheal <mair_fheal@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-17 20:17 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 06:47 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 09:19 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 07:57 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 21:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 15:27 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:37 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 13:28 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 18:39 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 18:44 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 06:20 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-18 17:20 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 02:26 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-18 09:53 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-18 18:14 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 10:19 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-18 15:22 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 08:33 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 06:28 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 11:29 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-18 16:33 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 09:45 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-19 01:18 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 18:45 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-19 03:52 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-18 18:55 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 22:04 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 06:09 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 01:04 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-20 01:00 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:20 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 20:36 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 21:40 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 22:44 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:48 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-19 23:43 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 13:11 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-19 04:32 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 13:41 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 15:41 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-18 19:02 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 20:06 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-19 05:53 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-19 00:57 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:37 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-21 18:32 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 05:49 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-22 15:04 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-22 07:37 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. mariposas rand mair fheal <mair_fheal@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-22 00:48 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-22 09:20 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-22 02:29 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 09:04 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 18:54 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 11:23 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-23 02:35 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 07:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 18:59 +0100
Page 15 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 … 13 14 [15] 16 Next page →
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-20 01:00 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3131cb266d33089998c826@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #554870 |
In article <nf7gcbdraeknqrc84ndhff91jre5occqad@4ax.com>, skeet@invalid.invalid says... > > On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 06:09:44 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote > Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > > >> And to think the quagmire Fakey "currently" finds himself in, all > >> started because he thought residential services were only 120 volts. > >> > >> <mocking snicker> > > > >Wrong. It's because *you* insisted the two hot legs were 240 volts, > >and the midpoint neutral was 120 volts, and the whole thing was > >"single-phase" rather than "split-phase midpoint-neutral". > > > So you admit you're in a quagmire. Is that go0f still trying to argue with me? LOL! -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote (Post-Burnore) Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2016 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-20 05:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <7bc90f70c0dcdfd7d493c504fcb6daa5@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #554334 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in <news:qe7ccbt9r2nn1r27pqql4fajbhljp3lucm@4ax.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >> >> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in >> <news:v01bcbl3fg5g1rg0kpbg2p3a0k9jpapj5l@4ax.com> did thusly jump head >> first into the wood chipper again: >>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), >>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1 wrote: >>>> On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:05:06 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood >>>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >>>>> Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded Libtard, in >>>>> <news:na283k$18kf$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into >>>>> the wood chipper again: >>>>>> On 17/02/2016 1:58 AM, Friendly Neighborhood >>>>>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>>>>>>>> A sinewave of 120 Hz frequency and 150 volt amplitude >>>>>>>>> A sinewave of 33 Hz frequency and 20.25 volt amplitude >>>>>>>>> A sinewave of 150 Hz frequency and 1400 volt amplitude >>>>>>>>> A sinewave of 5013 Hz frequency and 20 volt amplitude >>>>>>>>> A sinewave of 13 Hz and 600 volt amplitude >>>>>>>>> A sinewave of 1209 Hz and 360 volt amplitude >>> WTF is supposed to be the significance of a set of arbitrary >>> signals? Whatever... >> If you don't understand the discussion, feel free to excuse yourself >> from it. >>>>>>> You stupid fuck, do you not understand the concept of constructive and >>>>>>> destructive interference? >>> Bullshit here. Sinusoids superimposed together don't >>> "interfere", they just add together. It's simple >>> superposition, not interference. The writer doesn't >>> understand the concept of interference. >> I encourage you to study the topic of constructive and destructive >> wave interference. You're talking about the same thing. > Superposition is not "interference". You don't seem to know very much, yet you seem to talk alot. Out your ass. LOL <http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/waves/Lesson-3/Interference-of-Waves> ======================================================= The Principle of Superposition The task of determining the shape of the resultant demands that the principle of superposition is applied. The principle of superposition is sometimes stated as follows: When two waves _interfere_, the resulting displacement of the medium at any location is the algebraic sum of the displacements of the individual waves at that same location. ======================================================= <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAe3lkYNKt8> ======================================================= Interference is the combined effect of the disturbance caused by each individual wave at the same place and at the same time. This effect can be understood from the principle of superposition of waves. ======================================================= "Superposition is not "interference"." LOL! Moron doesn't even know about constructive and destructive interference, and stupidly believes it's different than constructive and destructive interference! LOL SPNAK! >> <http://www.acs.psu.edu/drussell/Demos/superposition/superposition.html> > This is about traveling waves. You didn't understand it. Apparently you have no clue about traveling and standing waves, either, or you'd understand that the principle of constructive and destructive interference (aka superposition) applies equally to them. Oh, you didn't see (or conveniently ignored) the "two sine waves traveling in opposite directions create a standing wave" part of that web page. "This is about traveling waves." LOL! SPNAK! >>> Now if someone knew enough to pick the right starting phases >>> (say, picking cosines instead of sines) you could make them >>> all add to 2550 volts at some particular time (time 0). But >>> he didn't, and they don't. >> They'll constructively interfere to 2550.25 volts at the >> 4,444,525,800th period. That's the common periodicity of those six >> sinewaves. > LOL! Good gawd amighty, you're stupid. The LCD of the > frequencies is 4.4 Ghz. Totally irrelevant to anything. WTF? Where do you get 4.4 GHz? It'll take 4,444,525,800 repetitions of each tributary sinewave in order for the resultant to play out once, then it repeats. Good gawd, you're dumb. LOL SPNAK! > The PERIOD is 1 sec. The composite signal repeats itself > every period. The 4 billionth period is exactly the same as > the first. That's what period means. The period of each tributary sinewave is the inverse of the frequency, you moron. The period of the resultant is the inverse of the frequency of the resultant at any given point in time, because remember, it's an irregular periodic sinusoid. You don't know much of anything, do you? LOL SPNAK! > The sum never reaches 2550 volts, which is why you can't > answer the question of at what time this happens. It peaks at 2517.697 volts, so the acid test of adding the voltages together as a quick and dirty way of seeing if DildoRider was even close worked. That's a damn site closer than DildoRider got with his kooky sinewave subtraction equation. Are you sure you're not on some sort of stupid pill, or something? LOL SPNAK! > <snip incoherent nonsense> Translation: "Snip everything I'm too stupid to understand." LOL SPNAK! -- Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey) 5907 Stanton Ave. Pittsburgh, PA (412) 853-6395 (412) 799-0532 (412) 665-8289 (412) 404-8757 DildoRider admits he's stoooopid: MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com> ================================================= >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's >> damaged your brain, DildoRider. > then it appears that you like shooting fish in > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are. Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell. <snicker> ================================================= DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com> ================================================= > so what you're saying is that your targets for attack > have to be really stupid or else you can't manage? ================================================= DildoRider admits much more about himself: MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com> ================================================= "absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly, toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless" ================================================= This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake. 150 IQ? LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-19 20:36 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.31318d351ceb1b6f98c81f@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #554813 |
In article <7bc90f70c0dcdfd7d493c504fcb6daa5@dizum.com>, FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx says... > Good gawd, you're dumb. LOL > Tickle your ass with a slide rule? -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote (Post-Burnore) Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2016 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-19 21:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bfrfcbtfo4cplpt59khf9v2g60p8rfdm1c@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #554816 |
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 20:36:39 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: >In article <7bc90f70c0dcdfd7d493c504fcb6daa5@dizum.com>, >FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx says... > > >> Good gawd, you're dumb. LOL >> > >Tickle your ass with a slide rule? Now I know why he was MIA, it took a lot of google raping to produce the foam he dropped earlier. he's been a busy little boy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-19 22:44 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3131ab36c68ff28b98c821@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #554817 |
In article <bfrfcbtfo4cplpt59khf9v2g60p8rfdm1c@4ax.com>, skeet@invalid.invalid says... > > On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 20:36:39 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1" > <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: > > >In article <7bc90f70c0dcdfd7d493c504fcb6daa5@dizum.com>, > >FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx says... > > > > > >> Good gawd, you're dumb. LOL > >> > > > >Tickle your ass with a slide rule? > > > Now I know why he was MIA, it took a lot of google raping to produce > the foam he dropped earlier. he's been a busy little boy. But he's still a cock-juggling gay moron. Just sayin'... J -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote (Post-Burnore) Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2016 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-20 05:48 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <c12c3fe075118feebd1f4f25540d2a3b@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #554816 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Jim "Jism Junkie Gerbil Cannon" Gorman (aka Chimpy the Coin-Slot
Operated SuckMonkey, aka Checkmate The PickleTickler), in
<news:MPG.31318d351ceb1b6f98c81f@news.altopia.com> did thusly jump
head first into the wood chipper again:
> In article <7bc90f70c0dcdfd7d493c504fcb6daa5@dizum.com>,
> Chimpy's Usenet Lord and Master
> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> says...
>> Good gawd, you're dumb. LOL
> Tickle your ass with a slide rule?
Fag.
<snicker>
--
FNVWe:
"The Man Who Spanked Chimpy Checkmate The Cowardly CockSmoker Out Of
AUK, Then Out Of The Flonk, Then Into Insanity, Then Made Him Run Away
Like A Little Spankard Bitch. Again."
In which Checkmate admits to being a faggot and fantasizing about men:
MID: <feb093af883d0bf288e85863264900ed@dizum.com>
MID: <ab050c692202f7d955f7d2876fd39d56@dizum.com>
In which Checkmate says he wants to spank guys all night long:
MID: <k3m5ls$3pr$1@news.mixmin.net>
In which Checkmate confesses his desire to fuck who he claims is a
guy:
MID: <k3oolf$cpe$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k9nj0v$u4a$2@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <l8ogd6$1cd$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lclrtd$eei$4@news.mixmin.net>
In which Checkmate admits he'd definitely fuck a male dog:
MID: <k2h0j1$6ll$5@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k4dsc7$l32$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k5m8o5$vmq$5@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
In which Checkmate admits to having a golden showers fetish:
MID: <k79p80$9ps$3@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k8t9l0$nf0$5@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k8t9kv$nev$5@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k994eg$77l$1@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k9i8is$sna$3@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <lf3noh$sqv$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <76b587bf03232be29596c7a5e11f8eef@dizum.com>
MID: <d1590e1490afb94915166440ceb1190f@dizum.com>
MID: <4c614669bd9da0e2ab54c7a8618864f2@dizum.com>
In which Checkmate asks a guy for a blowjob (again):
MID: <ka4m1r$8rs$2@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <knd50p$7ni$2@news.albasani.net>
MID: <knnmme$3a4$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kp77db$rqk$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kvvjjb$a8t$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kvvjjb$a8u$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l069qt$g3j$9@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l1b6g1$qqv$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l65hh2$jpd$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l9b7ha$ret$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lfe72e$q0s$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lffimp$k2f$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <13de9e018d33aa5c02a89f8acfd8c2f8@dizum.com>
MID: <ddfe5035129d525fb2c441289a7b3c1b@dizum.com>
MID: <8352c247386df60552fec12941ad0c47@dizum.com>
MID: <863c1b2a4221005e6d5252e4b2f955b1@dizum.com>
MID: <9d7e6e672aa61c16813ade0f2815d0bf@dizum.com>
MID: <aacd887c22128680f39ec3ca7f7e1613@dizum.com>
MID: <372519cc110e5acf0d73268cb1a697e9@dizum.com>
MID: <1b8820753ce4e2da87b17874d123f783@dizum.com>
Checkmate's got a thing about tickling guy's asses with random
objects:
MID: <l8rapt$rfm$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lfm4f8$3jb$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <li2ao1$3rf$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <37fb49820eaf36d0a45e91ce73d37d44@dizum.com>
MID: <13badb999438389ea8894228e51614a3@dizum.com>
MID: <2ce704d96dbf41ca89fd9eda221cb83c@dizum.com>
MID: <f9b10e223db85839d004420449391270@dizum.com>
MID: <184091e3de3a10096805606ec6dc5866@dizum.com>
MID: <ee740ba6bc409af0d2b4a66170b4e4d7@dizum.com>
MID: <d1d62217afbcbf98470365178072415a@dizum.com>
MID: <ac96244a69bc75dd3a60e8defda0b966@dizum.com>
MID: <9f02c35ef6d67ac06ee55f90199c3aaa@dizum.com>
MID: <3e4b3a8bb953839b7d2658130dcb927e@dizum.com>
MID: <9ec2ad3439122a906207c9f74c4a3a06@dizum.com>
MID: <761ef52f7fc54d46dd50e2692e160d92@dizum.com>
MID: <8ef71d83a5af476e6e275ea23b984323@dizum.com>
Checkmate's so gay he repeatedly insists that a picture of a vagina is
actually an asshole and balls... he went on and on about assholes and
balls... couldn't shut up about them... come to find out, he was just
trying to tell us that his lost love was actually a man:
MID: <l84jo7$cnd$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l84oip$icu$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l85ste$ao$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l87aud$saf$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l88ptv$nlj$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8dvdt$tj2$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8kl20$91i$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8psgt$m7d$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8rapv$rfm$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l98brg$6hp$6@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <ldg914$pel$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <31e4747ee7179064b1fdd5266cd08d72@dizum.com>
MID: <4dba3edb9556cb8d94bc7b90f3b0c8f0@dizum.com>
Chimpy the neurotic overwrought hysterical hissy-fit ninny escalates
his prescription drug abuse to "calm the fuck down" (Chimpy's words):
MID: <512f192b17a529cc6d490a55c43ac1be@dizum.com> - Oxy, Neurontin
MID: <kjucol$ckr$3@newsfeed.x-privat.org> - Oxy, Vicodin
MID: <kmqoip$cg3$8@news.albasani.net> - Norco
MID: <knc9l2$e66$2@news.albasani.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6lnn79.ppd.17.10@news.alt.net> - Oxycodone, Vicodin
MID: <6lo0dt.b7.17.4@news.alt.net> - Xanax
MID: <krt925$u63$3@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <6o9mv7.7ra.17.1@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6os03j.f3.19.2@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6p12vg.of8.19.2@news.alt.net> - Marijuana
MID: <6pg2lv.v27.17.2@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <kuqmlq$mi7$1@news.mixmin.net> - Amphetamine (!)
MID: <6qprvj.ndm.17.1@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6r26ti.ju0.19.2@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6stbk8.pbh.19.43@news.alt.net> - Ecstasy
MID: <l1b6g2$qr0$2@news.mixmin.net> - Vicodin
MID: <l5kd53$8kd$1@news.mixmin.net> - Norco
MID: <lanvc8$f06$2@news.mixmin.net> - Norco
MID: <larrim$lft$1@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <lcckii$mue$3@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <e7848d7ebc7f0b52e126bc35d82a65cf@dizum.com> - Hydrocodone,
Alprazolam
MID: <MPG.2eb9f496c779fc2998a54c@news.alt.net> - Percocet
Chimpy Checkmate's Famous Faggotisms:
=====================================
Chimpy tries enticing a straight man who lives with a woman to join
him in his lonely faggoty lifestyle:
Message-ID: <b1ae7a665b08a82e652e819482238fbd@dizum.com>
"How about I put the squirrel up your ass to keep your gerbil
company?"
Chimpy's desperate plea to a dude:
MID: <5b690abba10d04da8f7675d278f2c2b8@dizum.com>
"Diddle me!"
MID: <07b50fac74279fabaf78a605899b7934@dizum.com>
"Trojans are a condiment."
Chimpy discusses his new boyfriend, Dave "SnuhWolf" Norris:
MID: <c565ada4723ca2e5cd1259cf8a1d86df@dizum.com>
"Snuhbaby makes a good cock warmer."
MID: <ffd2a514115a20cb3122e71b81907a1f@dizum.com>
"Pack your donut hole, any time, anywhere!"
Chimpy discussing the relative merits of 4 inches versus 10 inches:
MID: <b62ad5949e43f36901836bb59898426a@dizum.com>
"Plus, I suppose it doesn't hurt as much when they stuff it up your
butt."
MID: <MPG.2a5ec5516fc9605298b5ac@news.alt.net>
"Best you keester a kielbasa."
Message-ID: <kvvjjb$a8t$3@news.mixmin.net>
"Brag about it to my dick."
"My dick can't quite hear you, could you come a little closer?"
MID: <knnmmb$3a4$1@news.mixmin.net>
"If you see a dick, suck it."
MID: <6qft9a.g1f.19.1@news.alt.net>
"The Winchester 1892 would make a damned-good dildo."
MID: <l61jjg$tth$1@news.mixmin.net>
"Pump a rump."
MID: <l9d76m$k1v$4@news.mixmin.net>
"You gerbils are always in the dark."
MID: <lal84d$g2u$5@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <97bfaeca4f3abe27b5f6683e319cdb18@dizum.com>
"I gotta gay named Guido from Jersey"
MID: <lamgt8$b2d$1@news.mixmin.net>
"If they're soft, yer probably blowin' it all wrong."
MID: <lchub0$q96$5@news.mixmin.net>
"Hitler would have made a damned good Queen."
MID: <lcsgjb$obk$2@news.mixmin.net>
"Don't get slapped by the cocks you crave."
MID: <b068d280517a2d6c831d4a43f2cc8d31@dizum.com>
To a nearly toothless man:
"I wouldn't pay you to suck my dick if your last tooth fell out."
So Chimpy prefers paying *nearly* toothless men for blowjobs, but not
*fully* toothless men. LOL
MID: <afe97a65ff77e7382ad77cf18ea63e85@dizum.com>
"If I send you some money, will you suck Greg's dick?"
Chimpy likes to watch. LOL
MID: <9d7e6e672aa61c16813ade0f2815d0bf@dizum.com>
"Suck my clit."
Chimpy's proposition to a tranny sucking faggot who gets around being
gay by claiming tranny cocks are 'huge dangling clits'. LOL
Chimpy is confused again: "giant ball-like labia". LOL
MID: <4dba3edb9556cb8d94bc7b90f3b0c8f0@dizum.com>
=====================================
What a FAG!
Melt, Chimpy, melt.
Froth, Chimpy, froth.
Dance, Chimpy, dance!
<snicker>
/\ Properly known as Bill
\ /\ The Monster You Kooks Can't Handle
\ / \ THERE IS NO CABAL - LONG LIVE THE NEW CABAL
\/ The AUK coup is complete. The Old Cabal is no more.
Accept no substitutes...
if it's from Databasix, it's a sure bet it's from a kook.
databasix.com / PacketDerm, LLC / COTSE:
all branches of the same malignant tree.
Message-ID: <l7m8ig$1ld$7@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8jh$1le$8@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8lh$1le$9@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8ne$1ld$8@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8pc$1le$10@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8rb$1ld$9@news.mixmin.net>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-19 23:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <na8qtq$5ql$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #554813 |
On 19/02/2016 11:20 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > It peaks at 2517.697 volts, Quiet backpedaling noted. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 13:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <va9ccbd294bg9ehkdlss0rgff6sph9ala1@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #554298 |
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:45:44 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >If you don't understand the discussion, feel free to excuse yourself >from it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-19 04:32 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <ee9ccbdmhbv8ls6rl7lqcqc064ir60iutr@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #554298 |
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > >>> Not that that would matter, > >>> as over the periodicity of the vector sum of the Fourier transformed > >>> phasors, constructive interference would cumulate to 2550.25 volts > > > What kind of addled silliness is this? Fourier transform > > moves you from the time domain to the frequency domain. So, > > if you are talking about some behavior in the time domain, > > such as peak value at some particular time, it's quite > > pointless. The rest of the blather makes no sense to me. > > Vector summation is a means of adding two or more vectors together. Why can't you add anything with it? > Given that a sinusoid is merely the *Fourier* transformation of a > circle, No it's not. It's a geometric function. FFS, in a rotating vector, a sinusoid is a TIME-domain function. > embodying an amplitude and a phase (ie: the angular shift of > the sinusoid, corresponding to a time shift), one can use phasors, or > complex numbers to denote the phase and amplitude. So?... > The Fourier > transform "demodulates" the phasor representation of the signal. No it doesn't. It transforms a function of time into a function of frequency. > x(t) = a * cos(wt + phase) > > Where: > w=frequency > a= amplitude > phase = angle in radians > > The phasor of x(t) is then X = a + jb, thus a = cos(phase) and b = sin > (phase). > > Thus, one can sum vectors: > a1 * cos(w1t + phase1) + a2 * cos(w2t +phase2) > > It's more efficient than computing the Fourier coefficients by > correlation using complex exponentials. You don't compute fourier coefficients by correlation. None of this has anything to do with adding 6 sinusoids, or with anything else for that matter. Can you actually use any of this to solve something?... say, the time when your composite has a value of 2550 v.? Take your time.... > Phasor: x(t) = a * cos(wt + phase) > Trigonometric: x(t) = a * cos(phase)*cos(wt) - a * sin(phase)*sin(wt) You got it wrong again. > > > The poster also demonstrates that s/h/it doesn't know what a > > "differential equation" means. > > I encourage you to educate yourself: > <http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-03sc-differential-equations-fall-2011/unit-i-first-order-differential-equations/sinusoidal-functions/> Another link you don't understand. > > It all sounds a fool trying to sound wise by babbling about > > some nonsense he knows nothing about, and hopes nobody else > > does either. > > Yeah, except everything I've written is true, No, it's all bullshit. > whereas DildoRider and > LunkHead are off in La-La Land spouting nonsense and using equations > that don't work. No, they were pretty much right. You are pretty much in the ozone. You're money ahead to cut your losses and move on, take a spin in the lotus with that hawt wifey.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 13:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <guaccb57idavjsbc1ldktkf98utk6psfuh@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #554353 |
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 04:32:27 +0800, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> wrote: >> >> Vector summation is a means of adding two or more vectors together. > >Why can't you add anything with it? He don't know how. > >> Given that a sinusoid is merely the *Fourier* transformation of a >> circle, > >No it's not. It's a geometric function. FFS, in a rotating >vector, a sinusoid is a TIME-domain function. He is a tad confuselled. > >> embodying an amplitude and a phase (ie: the angular shift of >> the sinusoid, corresponding to a time shift), one can use phasors, or >> complex numbers to denote the phase and amplitude. > >So?... He wanted to sound important to cover his ass. > >> The Fourier >> transform "demodulates" the phasor representation of the signal. > >No it doesn't. It transforms a function of time into a >function of frequency. This answer ought to be good. > > >> x(t) = a * cos(wt + phase) >> >> Where: >> w=frequency >> a= amplitude >> phase = angle in radians >> >> The phasor of x(t) is then X = a + jb, thus a = cos(phase) and b = sin >> (phase). >> >> Thus, one can sum vectors: >> a1 * cos(w1t + phase1) + a2 * cos(w2t +phase2) >> >> It's more efficient than computing the Fourier coefficients by >> correlation using complex exponentials. > >You don't compute fourier coefficients by correlation. >None of this has anything to do with adding 6 sinusoids, or >with anything else for that matter. Typical Fakey. > >Can you actually use any of this to solve something?... say, >the time when your composite has a value of 2550 v.? >Take your time.... > >> Phasor: x(t) = a * cos(wt + phase) >> Trigonometric: x(t) = a * cos(phase)*cos(wt) - a * sin(phase)*sin(wt) > >You got it wrong again. >> >> > The poster also demonstrates that s/h/it doesn't know what a >> > "differential equation" means. >> >> I encourage you to educate yourself: >> <http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-03sc-differential-equations-fall-2011/unit-i-first-order-differential-equations/sinusoidal-functions/> > >Another link you don't understand. > >> > It all sounds a fool trying to sound wise by babbling about >> > some nonsense he knows nothing about, and hopes nobody else >> > does either. >> >> Yeah, except everything I've written is true, > >No, it's all bullshit. > >> whereas DildoRider and >> LunkHead are off in La-La Land spouting nonsense and using equations >> that don't work. > >No, they were pretty much right. You are pretty much in the >ozone. You're money ahead to cut your losses and move on, >take a spin in the lotus with that hawt wifey. He can't, he owns none of the above.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 15:41 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op.yc1qf7dotm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #554353 |
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:32:27 -0500, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> wrote: > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > >> >>> Not that that would matter, >> >>> as over the periodicity of the vector sum of the Fourier transformed >> >>> phasors, constructive interference would cumulate to 2550.25 volts >> >> > What kind of addled silliness is this? Fourier transform >> > moves you from the time domain to the frequency domain. So, >> > if you are talking about some behavior in the time domain, >> > such as peak value at some particular time, it's quite >> > pointless. The rest of the blather makes no sense to me. >> >> Vector summation is a means of adding two or more vectors together. > > Why can't you add anything with it? > >> Given that a sinusoid is merely the *Fourier* transformation of a >> circle, > > No it's not. It's a geometric function. FFS, in a rotating > vector, a sinusoid is a TIME-domain function. > >> embodying an amplitude and a phase (ie: the angular shift of >> the sinusoid, corresponding to a time shift), one can use phasors, or >> complex numbers to denote the phase and amplitude. > > So?... > >> The Fourier >> transform "demodulates" the phasor representation of the signal. > > No it doesn't. It transforms a function of time into a > function of frequency. > > >> x(t) = a * cos(wt + phase) >> >> Where: >> w=frequency >> a= amplitude >> phase = angle in radians >> >> The phasor of x(t) is then X = a + jb, thus a = cos(phase) and b = sin >> (phase). >> >> Thus, one can sum vectors: >> a1 * cos(w1t + phase1) + a2 * cos(w2t +phase2) >> >> It's more efficient than computing the Fourier coefficients by >> correlation using complex exponentials. > > You don't compute fourier coefficients by correlation. > None of this has anything to do with adding 6 sinusoids, or > with anything else for that matter. > > Can you actually use any of this to solve something?... say, > the time when your composite has a value of 2550 v.? > Take your time.... > >> Phasor: x(t) = a * cos(wt + phase) >> Trigonometric: x(t) = a * cos(phase)*cos(wt) - a * sin(phase)*sin(wt) > > You got it wrong again. >> >> > The poster also demonstrates that s/h/it doesn't know what a >> > "differential equation" means. >> >> I encourage you to educate yourself: >> <http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-03sc-differential-equations-fall-2011/unit-i-first-order-differential-equations/sinusoidal-functions/> > > Another link you don't understand. > >> > It all sounds a fool trying to sound wise by babbling about >> > some nonsense he knows nothing about, and hopes nobody else >> > does either. >> >> Yeah, except everything I've written is true, > > No, it's all bullshit. > >> whereas DildoRider and >> LunkHead are off in La-La Land spouting nonsense and using equations >> that don't work. > > No, they were pretty much right. You are pretty much in the > ozone. You're money ahead to cut your losses and move on, > take a spin in the lotus with that hawt wifey. most likely he plugged his guess for "x" into the summation and found that it wasn't quite 2550.25 and also as a bonus found out that he has no clue WTF he's babbling about. -- "sines, sines, everywhere there's sines blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind" http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu - FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: <3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com> ">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics >> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all: >> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) >> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) >> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time: >> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x) Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking *moron*? "The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:"" it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/ http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png "To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each other:" http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf on page 2: ** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A) *COUGH* SPNAK!! - i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII art if you ask nicely. see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com> - Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to: "all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." <f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com> - On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: <snicker> Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL is where my usenet lord and mas-ter can go straight to hell* *hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening. - http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg - If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) - if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 - http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd - Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!: $ perl fakeyBot.pl FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you, look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker> You> Robert Michael Wolfe FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, Robert. <snicker> Robert> you talk about cocks a lot. FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot? Robert> gay sex, mostly... FakeyBot> Fag! (just as useful as the original!) - snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message <b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>: "That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden service. It's not rocket science. _The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my distinct impression was that the "anonymity research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a kiddie pr0n network.) That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation Onymous was just icing on the cake."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 19:02 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.313025aed55d604798c7ef@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #554353 |
In article <ee9ccbdmhbv8ls6rl7lqcqc064ir60iutr@4ax.com>, bender@the.future says... > > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > > > >>> Not that that would matter, > > >>> as over the periodicity of the vector sum of the Fourier transformed > > >>> phasors, constructive interference would cumulate to 2550.25 volts > > > > > What kind of addled silliness is this? Fourier transform > > > moves you from the time domain to the frequency domain. So, > > > if you are talking about some behavior in the time domain, > > > such as peak value at some particular time, it's quite > > > pointless. The rest of the blather makes no sense to me. > > > > Vector summation is a means of adding two or more vectors together. > > Why can't you add anything with it? > > > Given that a sinusoid is merely the *Fourier* transformation of a > > circle, > > No it's not. It's a geometric function. FFS, in a rotating > vector, a sinusoid is a TIME-domain function. > > > embodying an amplitude and a phase (ie: the angular shift of > > the sinusoid, corresponding to a time shift), one can use phasors, or > > complex numbers to denote the phase and amplitude. > > So?... > > > The Fourier > > transform "demodulates" the phasor representation of the signal. > > No it doesn't. It transforms a function of time into a > function of frequency. > > > > x(t) = a * cos(wt + phase) > > > > Where: > > w=frequency > > a= amplitude > > phase = angle in radians > > > > The phasor of x(t) is then X = a + jb, thus a = cos(phase) and b = sin > > (phase). > > > > Thus, one can sum vectors: > > a1 * cos(w1t + phase1) + a2 * cos(w2t +phase2) > > > > It's more efficient than computing the Fourier coefficients by > > correlation using complex exponentials. > > You don't compute fourier coefficients by correlation. > None of this has anything to do with adding 6 sinusoids, or > with anything else for that matter. > > Can you actually use any of this to solve something?... say, > the time when your composite has a value of 2550 v.? > Take your time.... > > > Phasor: x(t) = a * cos(wt + phase) > > Trigonometric: x(t) = a * cos(phase)*cos(wt) - a * sin(phase)*sin(wt) > > You got it wrong again. > > > > > The poster also demonstrates that s/h/it doesn't know what a > > > "differential equation" means. > > > > I encourage you to educate yourself: > > <http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-03sc-differential-equations-fall-2011/unit-i-first-order-differential-equations/sinusoidal-functions/> > > Another link you don't understand. > > > > It all sounds a fool trying to sound wise by babbling about > > > some nonsense he knows nothing about, and hopes nobody else > > > does either. > > > > Yeah, except everything I've written is true, > > No, it's all bullshit. > > > whereas DildoRider and > > LunkHead are off in La-La Land spouting nonsense and using equations > > that don't work. > > No, they were pretty much right. You are pretty much in the > ozone. You're money ahead to cut your losses and move on, > take a spin in the lotus with that hawt wifey. LOL! THAT will never happen. Fakey will spin, deflect, evade, change the subject, misconstrue what you said, toss in some red herrings, a few straw men, and if that doesn't work, he'll faglame you to death... but he'll NEVER back down or admit he was wrong. He hasn't matured enough for that yet. It's doubtful he ever will. -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote (Post-Burnore) Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2016 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 20:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <962mb6.saq.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #554503 |
Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > In article <ee9ccbdmhbv8ls6rl7lqcqc064ir60iutr@4ax.com>, > bender@the.future says... > > >> >> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus >> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> >>>>>> Not that that would matter, >>>>>> as over the periodicity of the vector sum of the Fourier >>>>>> transformed >>>>>> phasors, constructive interference would cumulate to 2550.25 >>>>>> volts >>> >>>> What kind of addled silliness is this? Fourier transform >>>> moves you from the time domain to the frequency domain. So, >>>> if you are talking about some behavior in the time domain, >>>> such as peak value at some particular time, it's quite >>>> pointless. The rest of the blather makes no sense to me. >>> >>> Vector summation is a means of adding two or more vectors together. >> >> Why can't you add anything with it? >> >>> Given that a sinusoid is merely the *Fourier* transformation of a >>> circle, >> >> No it's not. It's a geometric function. FFS, in a rotating >> vector, a sinusoid is a TIME-domain function. >> >>> embodying an amplitude and a phase (ie: the angular shift of >>> the sinusoid, corresponding to a time shift), one can use phasors, >>> or >>> complex numbers to denote the phase and amplitude. >> >> So?... >> >>> The Fourier >>> transform "demodulates" the phasor representation of the signal. >> >> No it doesn't. It transforms a function of time into a >> function of frequency. >> >> >>> x(t) = a * cos(wt + phase) >>> >>> Where: >>> w=frequency >>> a= amplitude >>> phase = angle in radians >>> >>> The phasor of x(t) is then X = a + jb, thus a = cos(phase) and b = >>> sin (phase). >>> >>> Thus, one can sum vectors: >>> a1 * cos(w1t + phase1) + a2 * cos(w2t +phase2) >>> >>> It's more efficient than computing the Fourier coefficients by >>> correlation using complex exponentials. >> >> You don't compute fourier coefficients by correlation. >> None of this has anything to do with adding 6 sinusoids, or >> with anything else for that matter. >> >> Can you actually use any of this to solve something?... say, >> the time when your composite has a value of 2550 v.? >> Take your time.... >> >>> Phasor: x(t) = a * cos(wt + phase) >>> Trigonometric: x(t) = a * cos(phase)*cos(wt) - a * >>> sin(phase)*sin(wt) >> >> You got it wrong again. >>> >>>> The poster also demonstrates that s/h/it doesn't know what a >>>> "differential equation" means. >>> >>> I encourage you to educate yourself: >>> <http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-03sc-differential-equations-fall-2011/unit-i-first-order-differential-equations/sinusoidal-functions/> >> >> Another link you don't understand. >> >>>> It all sounds a fool trying to sound wise by babbling about >>>> some nonsense he knows nothing about, and hopes nobody else >>>> does either. >>> >>> Yeah, except everything I've written is true, >> >> No, it's all bullshit. >> >>> whereas DildoRider and >>> LunkHead are off in La-La Land spouting nonsense and using equations >>> that don't work. >> >> No, they were pretty much right. You are pretty much in the >> ozone. You're money ahead to cut your losses and move on, >> take a spin in the lotus with that hawt wifey. > > LOL! THAT will never happen. Fakey will spin, deflect, evade, change > the subject, misconstrue what you said, toss in some red herrings, a > few > straw men, and if that doesn't work, he'll faglame you to death... but > he'll NEVER back down or admit he was wrong. He hasn't matured enough > for that yet. It's doubtful he ever will. everybody doubtful
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-19 05:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1miuqyu.mezsq9iuix6lN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #554505 |
% <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
> Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
> > In article <ee9ccbdmhbv8ls6rl7lqcqc064ir60iutr@4ax.com>,
> > bender@the.future says...
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Fakey Neighborhood Vote Wanker Ersatzus
> >> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>>>>> Not that that would matter,
> >>>>>> as over the periodicity of the vector sum of the Fourier
> >>>>>> transformed
> >>>>>> phasors, constructive interference would cumulate to 2550.25
> >>>>>> volts
> >>>
> >>>> What kind of addled silliness is this? Fourier transform
> >>>> moves you from the time domain to the frequency domain. So,
> >>>> if you are talking about some behavior in the time domain,
> >>>> such as peak value at some particular time, it's quite
> >>>> pointless. The rest of the blather makes no sense to me.
> >>>
> >>> Vector summation is a means of adding two or more vectors together.
> >>
> >> Why can't you add anything with it?
> >>
> >>> Given that a sinusoid is merely the *Fourier* transformation of a
> >>> circle,
> >>
> >> No it's not. It's a geometric function. FFS, in a rotating
> >> vector, a sinusoid is a TIME-domain function.
> >>
> >>> embodying an amplitude and a phase (ie: the angular shift of
> >>> the sinusoid, corresponding to a time shift), one can use phasors,
> >>> or
> >>> complex numbers to denote the phase and amplitude.
> >>
> >> So?...
> >>
> >>> The Fourier
> >>> transform "demodulates" the phasor representation of the signal.
> >>
> >> No it doesn't. It transforms a function of time into a
> >> function of frequency.
> >>
> >>
> >>> x(t) = a * cos(wt + phase)
> >>>
> >>> Where:
> >>> w=frequency
> >>> a= amplitude
> >>> phase = angle in radians
> >>>
> >>> The phasor of x(t) is then X = a + jb, thus a = cos(phase) and b =
> >>> sin (phase).
> >>>
> >>> Thus, one can sum vectors:
> >>> a1 * cos(w1t + phase1) + a2 * cos(w2t +phase2)
> >>>
> >>> It's more efficient than computing the Fourier coefficients by
> >>> correlation using complex exponentials.
> >>
> >> You don't compute fourier coefficients by correlation.
> >> None of this has anything to do with adding 6 sinusoids, or
> >> with anything else for that matter.
> >>
> >> Can you actually use any of this to solve something?... say,
> >> the time when your composite has a value of 2550 v.?
> >> Take your time....
> >>
> >>> Phasor: x(t) = a * cos(wt + phase)
> >>> Trigonometric: x(t) = a * cos(phase)*cos(wt) - a *
> >>> sin(phase)*sin(wt)
> >>
> >> You got it wrong again.
> >>>
> >>>> The poster also demonstrates that s/h/it doesn't know what a
> >>>> "differential equation" means.
> >>>
> >>> I encourage you to educate yourself:
>>>><http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-03sc-differential-equations-fall-2011/unit-i-first-order-differential-equations/sinusoidal-functions/>
> >>
> >> Another link you don't understand.
> >>
> >>>> It all sounds a fool trying to sound wise by babbling about
> >>>> some nonsense he knows nothing about, and hopes nobody else
> >>>> does either.
> >>>
> >>> Yeah, except everything I've written is true,
> >>
> >> No, it's all bullshit.
> >>
> >>> whereas DildoRider and
> >>> LunkHead are off in La-La Land spouting nonsense and using equations
> >>> that don't work.
> >>
> >> No, they were pretty much right. You are pretty much in the
> >> ozone. You're money ahead to cut your losses and move on,
> >> take a spin in the lotus with that hawt wifey.
> >
> > LOL! THAT will never happen. Fakey will spin, deflect, evade, change
> > the subject, misconstrue what you said, toss in some red herrings, a
> > few
> > straw men, and if that doesn't work, he'll faglame you to death... but
> > he'll NEVER back down or admit he was wrong. He hasn't matured enough
> > for that yet. It's doubtful he ever will.
>
> everybody doubtful
Now you doubtful too.
--
^Ï^. Sn!pe <snipeco.1@gmail.com>
My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-19 00:57 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op.yc2f52oqtm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #554548 |
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:53:12 -0500, Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote: > % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >> > In article <ee9ccbdmhbv8ls6rl7lqcqc064ir60iutr@4ax.com>, >> > bender@the.future says... >> > >> > >> >> >> >> Fakey Neighborhood Vote Wanker Ersatzus >> >> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> >> >> >>>>>> Not that that would matter, >> >>>>>> as over the periodicity of the vector sum of the Fourier >> >>>>>> transformed >> >>>>>> phasors, constructive interference would cumulate to 2550.25 >> >>>>>> volts >> >>> >> >>>> What kind of addled silliness is this? Fourier transform >> >>>> moves you from the time domain to the frequency domain. So, >> >>>> if you are talking about some behavior in the time domain, >> >>>> such as peak value at some particular time, it's quite >> >>>> pointless. The rest of the blather makes no sense to me. >> >>> >> >>> Vector summation is a means of adding two or more vectors together. >> >> >> >> Why can't you add anything with it? >> >> >> >>> Given that a sinusoid is merely the *Fourier* transformation of a >> >>> circle, >> >> >> >> No it's not. It's a geometric function. FFS, in a rotating >> >> vector, a sinusoid is a TIME-domain function. >> >> >> >>> embodying an amplitude and a phase (ie: the angular shift of >> >>> the sinusoid, corresponding to a time shift), one can use phasors, >> >>> or >> >>> complex numbers to denote the phase and amplitude. >> >> >> >> So?... >> >> >> >>> The Fourier >> >>> transform "demodulates" the phasor representation of the signal. >> >> >> >> No it doesn't. It transforms a function of time into a >> >> function of frequency. >> >> >> >> >> >>> x(t) = a * cos(wt + phase) >> >>> >> >>> Where: >> >>> w=frequency >> >>> a= amplitude >> >>> phase = angle in radians >> >>> >> >>> The phasor of x(t) is then X = a + jb, thus a = cos(phase) and b = >> >>> sin (phase). >> >>> >> >>> Thus, one can sum vectors: >> >>> a1 * cos(w1t + phase1) + a2 * cos(w2t +phase2) >> >>> >> >>> It's more efficient than computing the Fourier coefficients by >> >>> correlation using complex exponentials. >> >> >> >> You don't compute fourier coefficients by correlation. >> >> None of this has anything to do with adding 6 sinusoids, or >> >> with anything else for that matter. >> >> >> >> Can you actually use any of this to solve something?... say, >> >> the time when your composite has a value of 2550 v.? >> >> Take your time.... >> >> >> >>> Phasor: x(t) = a * cos(wt + phase) >> >>> Trigonometric: x(t) = a * cos(phase)*cos(wt) - a * >> >>> sin(phase)*sin(wt) >> >> >> >> You got it wrong again. >> >>> >> >>>> The poster also demonstrates that s/h/it doesn't know what a >> >>>> "differential equation" means. >> >>> >> >>> I encourage you to educate yourself: >>>>> <http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-03sc-differential-equations-fall-2011/unit-i-first-order-differential-equations/sinusoidal-functions/> >> >> >> >> Another link you don't understand. >> >> >> >>>> It all sounds a fool trying to sound wise by babbling about >> >>>> some nonsense he knows nothing about, and hopes nobody else >> >>>> does either. >> >>> >> >>> Yeah, except everything I've written is true, >> >> >> >> No, it's all bullshit. >> >> >> >>> whereas DildoRider and >> >>> LunkHead are off in La-La Land spouting nonsense and using equations >> >>> that don't work. >> >> >> >> No, they were pretty much right. You are pretty much in the >> >> ozone. You're money ahead to cut your losses and move on, >> >> take a spin in the lotus with that hawt wifey. >> > >> > LOL! THAT will never happen. Fakey will spin, deflect, evade, change >> > the subject, misconstrue what you said, toss in some red herrings, a >> > few >> > straw men, and if that doesn't work, he'll faglame you to death... but >> > he'll NEVER back down or admit he was wrong. He hasn't matured enough >> > for that yet. It's doubtful he ever will. >> >> everybody doubtful > > Now you doubtful too. > i wonder if gerg will have to order a new cheerleader uniform or if he's going to continue rah-rah siss-boom-bah-ing for bleaty the spankard. -- "sines, sines, everywhere there's sines blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind" http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu - FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: <3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com> ">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics >> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all: >> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) >> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) >> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time: >> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x) Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking *moron*? "The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:"" it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/ http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png "To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each other:" http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf on page 2: ** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A) *COUGH* SPNAK!! - i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII art if you ask nicely. see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com> - Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to: "all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." <f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com> - On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: <snicker> Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL is where my usenet lord and mas-ter can go straight to hell* *hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening. - http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg - If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) - if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 - http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd - Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!: $ perl fakeyBot.pl FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you, look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker> You> Robert Michael Wolfe FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, Robert. <snicker> Robert> you talk about cocks a lot. FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot? Robert> gay sex, mostly... FakeyBot> Fag! (just as useful as the original!) - snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message <b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>: "That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden service. It's not rocket science. _The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my distinct impression was that the "anonymity research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a kiddie pr0n network.) That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation Onymous was just icing on the cake."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-20 05:37 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <ce317d557ea7f89bbe7918172b93896f@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #554353 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in <news:ee9ccbdmhbv8ls6rl7lqcqc064ir60iutr@4ax.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >>>>> Not that that would matter, >>>>> as over the periodicity of the vector sum of the Fourier transformed >>>>> phasors, constructive interference would cumulate to 2550.25 volts >>> What kind of addled silliness is this? Fourier transform >>> moves you from the time domain to the frequency domain. So, >>> if you are talking about some behavior in the time domain, >>> such as peak value at some particular time, it's quite >>> pointless. The rest of the blather makes no sense to me. >> Vector summation is a means of adding two or more vectors together. > Why can't you add anything with it? Who says I can't? I'm enjoying watching DildoRider prove himself wrong with his kooky sinewave subtraction equation. LOL <http://i.imgur.com/sIEvIpF.png> You'll note that DildoRider calculated a flat line. <guffaw> >> Given that a sinusoid is merely the *Fourier* transformation of a >> circle, > No it's not. It's a geometric function. FFS, in a rotating > vector, a sinusoid is a TIME-domain function. Oh, yet again you're *wrong*. You haven't been right about one single thing yet. LOL <https://jackschaedler.github.io/circles-sines-signals/dft_walkthrough.html> DFT stands for Discrete Fourier Transform. <http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/> See the animations about 1/4th down the page? Yeah, those are Fourier transforms transforming circles to sine waves in real time... and in the process smearing egg on your stoooopid face. LOL SPNAK! >> embodying an amplitude and a phase (ie: the angular shift of >> the sinusoid, corresponding to a time shift), one can use phasors, or >> complex numbers to denote the phase and amplitude. > So?... So think of it in terms of revolutions... we're used to discussing rotation in revolutions per minute. A circle translates into a sinewave because a full rotation is 2*pi radians, because a circle's circumference is 2*pi*radius. So a sinewave's frequency (the time it takes to complete one full sine, or one full "rotation" of 2*pi radians) is the same as RPMs, whereas the amplitude of the sinewave is analogous to the radius of the circle. Euler's formula describes two equivalent ways to move in a circle. The ratio of sin(x)/x determines vertical and horizontal movement around the perimeter of that circle. Thus the statement cos(x)+ i*sin(x) is a way to embody both coordinates into a single number. If we set x=pi, we've moved halfway around that circle, and x=2*pi describes a full circle. Thus, if you transpose a sine in the vertical with an identical sine in the horizontal, you go in a circle. And that brings us to the differential equation part of it... a sine's behavior can be described by y"=-y, which is another way of saying that for a given position y, the acceleration (y") is opposite y. Likewise, cosine can be described by y"=y, which is another way of saying that for a given position y, the acceleration (y") is equal to y. And *that* is why DildoRider's kooky sinewave subtraction equation doesn't work, no matter if he swaps out the minus signs for plus signs... if he understood the concept behind how sinewaves are a transformation of a circle, he'd have realized this from the start. He didn't, because he's a mathematical moron. LOL >> The Fourier >> transform "demodulates" the phasor representation of the signal. > No it doesn't. Yeah, it does. <http://dsp.stackexchange.com/questions/17129/how-to-get-the-phasorfrequency-domain-representation-of-a-digitalized-signal> <http://pages.jh.edu/~signals/phasorlecture2/indexphasorlect2.htm> <http://www.eng.buffalo.edu/Research/BEST/Research/Lecture%20Series%202013/PMU%20Intro.pdf> SPNAK! > It transforms a function of time into a function of frequency. Frequency is a function of time, moron. LOL >> x(t) = a * cos(wt + phase) >> >> Where: >> w=frequency >> a= amplitude >> phase = angle in radians >> >> The phasor of x(t) is then X = a + jb, thus a = cos(phase) and b = sin >> (phase). >> >> Thus, one can sum vectors: >> a1 * cos(w1t + phase1) + a2 * cos(w2t +phase2) >> >> It's more efficient than computing the Fourier coefficients by >> correlation using complex exponentials. > You don't compute fourier coefficients by correlation. You just love getting SPNAK!'d, don't you? LOL <http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Cross-CorrelationTheorem.html> <http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.167.8344&rep=rep1&type=pdf> "This paper is part 6 in a series of papers about the Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) and the Inverse Discrete Fourier Transform (IDFT). The focus of this paper is on correlation." SPNAK! > None of this has anything to do with adding 6 sinusoids, or > with anything else for that matter. It has *everything* to do with adding sinewaves of different frequencies. Using Euler's equation to convert to phasors, one can do phasor math rather than trigonometric or complex exponential. > Can you actually use any of this to solve something?... say, > the time when your composite has a value of 2550 v.? > Take your time.... It's only used every day by every single scientist and engineer to solve everyday problems, and has been since the 18th century, whereas DildoRider's kooky sinewave subtraction equation has been in use for less than a month by one thoroughly confused mathematical moron. LOL <snicker> >> Phasor: x(t) = a * cos(wt + phase) >> Trigonometric: x(t) = a * cos(phase)*cos(wt) - a * sin(phase)*sin(wt) > You got it wrong again. You're stupid. That's the exact phasor and trigonometric equation used to describe a sinewave. Moron. LOL So you see, DildoRider attempted to use the phasor means of sinewave summation as a trigonometric means of sinewave summation, then when that didn't work, changed the cos to a sin, the summation to subtraction, then wondered aloud and frequently why it still didn't work. Because DildoRider's a mathematical moron. SPNAK! >>> The poster also demonstrates that s/h/it doesn't know what a >>> "differential equation" means. >> I encourage you to educate yourself: >> <http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-03sc-differential-equations-fall-2011/unit-i-first-order-differential-equations/sinusoidal-functions/> > Another link you don't understand. I'm sorry you don't understand that differential equations are used in the calculation of sinewaves. Does your stupidity stem from a lack of education, or from a more congenital origin? LOL SPNAK! >>> It all sounds a fool trying to sound wise by babbling about >>> some nonsense he knows nothing about, and hopes nobody else >>> does either. >> Yeah, except everything I've written is true, > No, it's all bullshit. It's all provably true. You're just a moron sticking up for other morons, and getting crushed right along with them. LOL >> whereas DildoRider and >> LunkHead are off in La-La Land spouting nonsense and using equations >> that don't work. > No, they were pretty much right. You are pretty much in the > ozone. You're money ahead to cut your losses and move on, > take a spin in the lotus with that hawt wifey. No, they're dead wrong. But of course, you're the moron who thinks superposition and wave interference are two different things, who didn't know that a sinewave is merely a Fourier decomposition of a circle, who didn't know that wave interference works the same for standing and traveling waves, who denies an equation in use by the smartest people on the planet since the 18th century, an equation that rivals Einstein's E=mc^2 in importance. And now you'll backpedal and bleat hard to cover up all your embarrassing mistakes... so *many* of them in just one day. That's gotta be embarrassing to you, eh? You must feel really stoooopid right now. SPNAK! -- Kensi the moron wrote: ================================ The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so the curvature is 4*pi ================================ Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi. Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi Therefore, r = 0.28209479176 Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the units. The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect. Kensi the moron was corrected: ================================ Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you backpedal, LunkHead. You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore = (4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original "The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*? ================================ But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry problems. Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is "science fiction" and "a howler". In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold. He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature, and thus causing gravity to *repel*. Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of magnetic attraction. Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work, and therefore a universe which could not exist. Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation". Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow at 489 F. Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of "blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how spectral absorption and emission works. Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same moron continues to cling to his delusions. Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite. Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's intelligent... and failing badly. That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that struggles (and fails) to understand reality.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-21 18:32 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <vt3jcb5087j1ftkd3l2pe12td43m47ee9r@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #554821 |
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > > Why can't you add anything with it? > > Who says I can't? I'm enjoying watching DildoRider prove himself wrong > with his kooky sinewave subtraction equation. LOL > > <http://i.imgur.com/sIEvIpF.png> I mean, why can't you add anything *right* with it? <snicker> > >> Given that a sinusoid is merely the *Fourier* transformation of a > >> circle, > > > No it's not. It's a geometric function. FFS, in a rotating > > vector, a sinusoid is a TIME-domain function. <irrelevent junk snipped> > <http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/> > See the animations about 1/4th down the page? Yeah, those are Fourier > transforms transforming circles to sine waves in real time... and in > the process smearing egg on your stoooopid face. LOL No fooly'all transforming going on there. Just a simple, REAL geometric illustration. Why can't you do a fourier transform of a circle, k00ky? SPNAKKITY-SPNAK! > Euler's formula describes two equivalent ways to move in a circle. The > ratio of sin(x)/x determines vertical and horizontal movement around LOL! What does a sinc function have to do with anything? It's used to describe sampling and aliasing, but it's not a "fourier transform of a circle". > the perimeter of that circle. Thus the statement cos(x)+ i*sin(x) is a > way to embody both coordinates into a single number. That's 2 numbers. The imaginary part isn't necessary for drawing a real circle. > > Thus, if you transpose a sine in the vertical with an identical sine > in the horizontal, you go in a circle. No, you'd have to use a cosine for the horizontal. > >> The Fourier > >> transform "demodulates" the phasor representation of the signal. > > > No it doesn't. > > Yeah, it does. > > <http://dsp.stackexchange.com/questions/17129/how-to-get-the-phasorfrequency-domain-representation-of-a-digitalized-signal> > <http://pages.jh.edu/~signals/phasorlecture2/indexphasorlect2.htm> > <http://www.eng.buffalo.edu/Research/BEST/Research/Lecture%20Series%202013/PMU%20Intro.pdf> > > SPNAK! > > > It transforms a function of time into a function of frequency. > > Frequency is a function of time, moron. LOL So you don't understand what a fourier transform does. Which you've already proven. <yawn> > > None of this has anything to do with adding 6 sinusoids, or > > with anything else for that matter. > > It has *everything* to do with adding sinewaves of different > frequencies. Using Euler's equation to convert to phasors, one can do > phasor math rather than trigonometric or complex exponential. So you will add phasors of different frequencies, and get... GIGO? > > Can you actually use any of this to solve something?... say, > > the time when your composite has a value of 2550 v.? > > Take your time.... > > It's only used every day by every single scientist and engineer to Translation: No. > >>> The poster also demonstrates that s/h/it doesn't know what a > >>> "differential equation" means. > > >> I encourage you to educate yourself: > >> <http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-03sc-differential-equations-fall-2011/unit-i-first-order-differential-equations/sinusoidal-functions/> > > > Another link you don't understand. > > I'm sorry you don't understand that differential equations are used in > the calculation of sinewaves. Not really. However trig functions are often used to solve differential equations. Does your stupidity stem from a lack of education, or from a more congenital origin? LOL SPNAK!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-22 05:49 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <bae384d15c1bd8c51ddfd450489edc8a@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #555222 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in <news:vt3jcb5087j1ftkd3l2pe12td43m47ee9r@4ax.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >>> Why can't you add anything with it? >> Who says I can't? I'm enjoying watching DildoRider prove himself wrong >> with his kooky sinewave subtraction equation. LOL >> >> <http://i.imgur.com/sIEvIpF.png> > I mean, why can't you add anything *right* with it? > > <snicker> I did. You're just a moron who doesn't understand how the Euler sinewave summation equation works, so you stoooopidly bleat out retarded bullshit about my having graphed 120 volt peak and similar stupidity. <http://i.imgur.com/SMRGcQY.png> The same as the graph above, but with the sections of the third equation switched so people can see the 0 degrees, 120 degrees and 240 degrees 170 volt peak tributary sinewaves that result in the 120.208 volt RMS L-N first resultant sinewaves and one of the 208.207 volt RMS L-L second resultant sinewaves, as is evidenced in 120/208 wye electrical service, the most ubiquitous commercial electrical service. SPNAK! >>>> Given that a sinusoid is merely the *Fourier* transformation of a >>>> circle, >>> No it's not. It's a geometric function. FFS, in a rotating >>> vector, a sinusoid is a TIME-domain function. > <irrelevent junk snipped> Translation: "Stuff that proved me *wrong* cowardly snipped." LOL Restored: >> Oh, yet again you're *wrong*. You haven't been right about one single >> thing yet. LOL >> >> <https://jackschaedler.github.io/circles-sines-signals/dft_walkthrough.html> >> DFT stands for Discrete Fourier Transform. "circles-sines-signals" "Discrete Fourier Transform" SPNAK! >> <http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/> >> See the animations about 1/4th down the page? Yeah, those are Fourier >> transforms transforming circles to sine waves in real time... and in >> the process smearing egg on your stoooopid face. LOL > No fooly'all transforming going on there. Just a simple, > REAL geometric illustration. <http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/> an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform Backpedaling Moron. SPNAK! > Why can't you do a fourier transform of a circle, k00ky? I can. Why can't you understand simple math like the fact that a sinewave is 2*pi radians, a circle's circumference is 2*pi*radius, therefore a sinewave is a Fourier transform of a circle, with the sinewave amplitude analogous to the circle's radius? Is it because you're a moron? Yeah it is. > SPN<SMACKAKOOK!> SPNAK! >> Euler's formula describes two equivalent ways to move in a circle. The >> ratio of sin(x)/x determines vertical and horizontal movement around > LOL! What does a sinc function have to do with anything? > > It's used to describe sampling and aliasing, but it's not a > "fourier transform of a circle". <http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/> See the animations about 1/4th down the page? Yeah, those are Fourier transforms transforming circles to sine waves in real time... and in the process smearing egg on your stoooopid face. LOL SPNAK! >> the perimeter of that circle. Thus the statement cos(x)+ i*sin(x) is a >> way to embody both coordinates into a single number. > That's 2 numbers. The imaginary part isn't necessary for > drawing a real circle. Wow. Just... wow. You're a moron. LOL Ok, go on, prove it. Graph a circle using only the real part. <snicker> >> Thus, if you transpose a sine in the vertical with an identical sine >> in the horizontal, you go in a circle. > No, you'd have to use a cosine for the horizontal. Says the moron who doesn't understand how or why the Euler-Fourier sinewave summation equation works, nor why Fourier's formulas were originally rejected by the mathematics community because people were apparently just as stoooopid as Shiny Tinfoil Brain and couldn't conceptualize that a sinewave is a transform of a circle. You'd have to *graph* it with a cosine function, but if you transpose a _sine_ in the vertical with an identical _sine_ in the horizontal, you go in a circle. Moron. Happy now, Mr. Pedantic? <http://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-understanding-of-sine-waves/> SPNAK! Restoring the rest, which you snipped out because you've previously k'lamed differential equations aren't used to calculate sinewaves: >> And that brings us to the differential equation part of it... a >> sinewave's behavior can be described by y"=-y, which is another >> way of saying that for a given position y, the acceleration (y") >> is opposite y. Likewise, cosine can be described by y"=y, which >> is another way of saying that for a given position y, the >> acceleration (y") is equal to y. >> >> And *that* is why DildoRider's kooky sinewave subtraction equation >> doesn't work, no matter if he swaps out the minus signs for plus >> signs... if he understood the concept behind how sinewaves are a >> transformation of a circle, he'd have realized this from the start. >> >> He didn't, because he's a mathematical moron. LOL I note you snipped and ran away from that SPNAK!, kook. LOL >>>> The Fourier >>>> transform "demodulates" the phasor representation of the signal. >>> No it doesn't. >> Yeah, it does. >> >> <http://dsp.stackexchange.com/questions/17129/how-to-get-the-phasorfrequency-domain-representation-of-a-digitalized-signal> >> <http://pages.jh.edu/~signals/phasorlecture2/indexphasorlect2.htm> >> <http://www.eng.buffalo.edu/Research/BEST/Research/Lecture%20Series%202013/PMU%20Intro.pdf> >> >> SPNAK! <crickets> LOL SPNAK! >>> It transforms a function of time into a function of frequency. >> Frequency is a function of time, moron. LOL > So you don't understand what a fourier transform does. Which > you've already proven. <yawn> You're projecting because you're a moron. LOL Aren't you the *moron* who k'lamed the period was measured in Hz, and that the resultant would be 4.4 GHz? Yeah... yeah you are. Aren't you the *moron* who k'lamed the "frequency of the composite sum is 1 hz."? Yeah... yeah, you are. Aren't you the *moron* who doesn't understand that the period is the inverse of the frequency? Yeah... yeah you are. So you're the *moron* who believes that 4,400,000,000 = 1. SPNAK! >>> None of this has anything to do with adding 6 sinusoids, or >>> with anything else for that matter. >> It has *everything* to do with adding sinewaves of different >> frequencies. Using Euler's equation to convert to phasors, one can do >> phasor math rather than trigonometric or complex exponential. > So you will add phasors of different frequencies, and get... > GIGO? No, because Euler's sinewave summation equation allows one to add sinewaves of different frequencies and phase because it's a Fourier transform. That's why the Euler sinewave summation equation is a subset of what are known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas. Moron. But thanks for yet again demonstrating that you have no fucking clue how the math works. Moron. SPNAK! >>> Can you actually use any of this to solve something?... say, >>> the time when your composite has a value of 2550 v.? >>> Take your time.... >> It's only used every day by every single scientist and engineer to > Translation: No. <http://i.imgur.com/SMRGcQY.png> Showing the Euler sinewave summation equation plotting 170 volt peak hot legs translating into 120.208 volt RMS L-N and 208.207 volt RMS L-L, as is evidenced in 120/208 wye electrical service, the most ubiquitous commercial electrical service. DildoRider can't figure out that Euler-Fourier equation to save his pathetic life, but he makes up for it by spamming bad sinewave after bad sinewave. Shiny Tinfoil Brain didn't even know the Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*), that superposition was the same as wave interference, that wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves, nor that 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L. LunkHead is back to backpedaling about "zOMG! Antherpoomorefluch Glaobael Waoreying! DDUUUURRRHHH!" and getting his stoooopid ass kicked over it because he can't seem to wrap his puny little brain around the Laws of Thermodynamics, nor around reality. And I'm the *only* one who got the equation to graph properly. <dances a jig> Ah, it's good to be the king. Maybe next time you'll think twice about tangling with somebody smarter than you. Moron. LOL <snicker, gloat, snicker, gloat, snicker, gloat... snicker> SPNAK! >>>>> The poster also demonstrates that s/h/it doesn't know what a >>>>> "differential equation" means. >>>> I encourage you to educate yourself: >>>> <http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-03sc-differential-equations-fall-2011/unit-i-first-order-differential-equations/sinusoidal-functions/> >>> Another link you don't understand. >> I'm sorry you don't understand that differential equations are used in >> the calculation of sinewaves. > Not really. However trig functions are often used to solve > differential equations. Well, there ya go, you've just admitted that you're clueless. Again. Your level of stupidity should hurt. Go get a hammer and beat yourself senseless. Moron. <snicker> >> Does your stupidity stem from a lack of education, or from a >> more congenital origin? LOL >> >> SPNAK! <crickets> LOL SPNAK! -- Kensi the moron wrote: ================================ The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so the curvature is 4*pi ================================ Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi. Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi Therefore, r = 0.28209479176 Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the units. The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect. Kensi the moron was corrected: ================================ Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you backpedal, LunkHead. You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore = (4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original "The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*? ================================ But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry problems. Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is "science fiction" and "a howler". In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold. He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature, and thus causing gravity to *repel*. Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of magnetic attraction. Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work, and therefore a universe which could not exist. Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation". Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow at 489 F. Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of "blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how spectral absorption and emission works. Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same moron continues to cling to his delusions. Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite. Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's intelligent... and failing badly. That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that struggles (and fails) to understand reality.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-22 15:04 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <3lclcbd1gemp4t197ublcomv3scsospkno@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #555390 |
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: <repeat same old blather showing it doesn't understand the difference between RMS and peak, or what Fourier transforms are> Yawn.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-22 07:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1mj0fbr.2msyxi12iti0nN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #555416 |
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> wrote: > Fakey Neighborhood Vote Wanker Ersatzus > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > > <repeat same old blather showing it doesn't understand the > difference between RMS and peak, or what Fourier transforms > are> > > Yawn. > That's his usual strategy: repeat, repeat, repeat. Truth doesn't matter; by constant repetition he will miraculously transform lies into his "truth" and he expects us to swallow such absurdity - very kooky. Yawn indeed. -- ^Ï^. Sn!pe, DoW #2 <snipeco.1@gmail.com> PTB Siri Seal of Disavowal #007-007 (license to killfile) AUK DoW #2, Fuckhead #3 AUK Ministry of Circle Jerks, Aug. 2015 (award now deprecated) 0 % My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 15 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 … 13 14 [15] 16 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web