Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #553795 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-17 07:58 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-02-22 18:59 +0100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 309 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-17 07:58 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 10:38 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-17 19:31 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-17 11:55 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 14:04 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-17 12:11 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 07:25 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 01:44 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 09:46 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 07:57 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-18 15:18 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 10:22 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 08:33 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 21:20 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 13:36 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 14:03 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-17 12:11 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 07:20 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-17 11:45 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-17 09:17 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-17 17:23 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 12:35 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-17 19:54 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-17 12:10 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-17 16:19 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-17 13:41 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 16:55 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 06:36 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 18:35 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-18 19:08 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 20:57 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 22:58 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-19 06:32 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-18 23:50 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-19 10:09 -0600
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-19 11:13 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 09:31 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 10:45 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-19 17:58 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 10:12 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 11:19 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-19 19:31 -0600
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 11:14 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-19 13:17 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-19 18:46 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 12:17 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 10:17 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-19 19:24 -0600
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-19 20:29 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-19 19:46 -0600
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 17:48 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-19 20:58 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 21:07 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 20:09 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-20 12:09 -0600
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:59 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 01:38 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 22:52 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 19:06 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 13:24 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 11:30 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-20 10:55 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 12:36 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 22:22 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 23:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 18:19 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-20 16:18 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-21 06:05 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-21 16:00 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 06:09 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-27 01:51 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-26 23:38 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 19:37 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-27 11:48 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 02:14 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-27 23:47 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-28 10:22 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-28 22:57 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-28 07:23 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:08 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 10:23 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 18:54 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-29 02:11 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 11:24 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-28 13:59 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-28 11:16 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 14:26 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-28 11:28 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-28 19:30 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-28 14:57 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-29 03:30 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:28 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 01:51 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 19:03 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 23:00 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 06:13 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:11 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-01 09:55 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:45 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 21:05 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 13:40 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 16:06 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:05 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 11:23 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 14:09 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:13 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 01:36 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 18:19 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 12:35 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 06:24 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 07:50 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 20:28 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 13:39 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 07:15 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 16:16 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 08:21 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 07:40 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-28 13:56 -0500
Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 14:11 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:33 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 01:58 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 17:30 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-29 09:46 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:33 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 18:04 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 08:28 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 19:32 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:50 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 16:10 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 16:29 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:00 +0100
Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:30 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:13 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 23:45 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 20:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 23:01 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 05:41 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 00:08 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-29 21:33 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 07:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:24 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 12:25 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 12:51 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-01 10:38 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 21:58 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 16:27 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 07:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 01:52 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 18:59 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 20:44 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 13:38 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 16:17 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-01 13:50 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 15:06 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-01 16:08 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 17:13 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 23:37 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:45 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 01:04 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 18:16 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:24 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-02 00:26 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 18:42 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-02 12:32 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-02 11:50 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 06:52 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 07:40 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 08:05 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:26 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-01 09:59 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 19:26 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 13:40 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:55 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 16:02 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:12 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 00:48 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:12 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 00:48 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 19:40 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 14:47 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 15:31 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 15:45 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-02 12:47 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 16:57 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-02 17:46 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-03-02 21:21 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 22:33 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-03-02 22:54 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 23:48 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 22:31 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-02 20:47 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 23:52 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-02 20:57 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-03 00:15 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 06:41 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 08:54 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-03 13:17 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-04 03:44 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa liquid <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-03 22:29 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:52 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:30 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-03-01 00:14 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 20:18 +0100
Fakey see's the light. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 13:34 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 05:46 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 08:44 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 06:46 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 06:45 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:33 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 06:19 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-27 01:55 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-26 23:48 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-27 04:41 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-27 04:10 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-27 07:23 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-27 12:57 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 21:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 19:48 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-27 12:18 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 19:15 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-27 11:41 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 20:48 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-27 13:07 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:00 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 11:22 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-28 11:13 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-28 19:16 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:23 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 14:14 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-28 14:17 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-28 11:26 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-29 12:38 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:23 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 01:46 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 17:20 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 12:00 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 18:19 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-29 10:47 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-29 11:13 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-29 19:41 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-01 04:06 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 02:17 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:58 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 12:13 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-22 05:30 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-21 16:42 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-22 05:47 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-17 20:05 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 22:39 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. mariposas rand mair fheal <mair_fheal@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-17 20:17 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 06:47 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 09:19 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 07:57 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 21:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 15:27 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:37 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 13:28 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 18:39 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 18:44 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 06:20 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-18 17:20 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 02:26 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-18 09:53 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-18 18:14 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 10:19 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-18 15:22 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 08:33 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 06:28 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 11:29 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-18 16:33 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 09:45 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-19 01:18 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 18:45 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-19 03:52 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-18 18:55 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 22:04 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 06:09 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 01:04 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-20 01:00 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:20 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 20:36 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 21:40 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 22:44 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:48 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-19 23:43 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 13:11 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-19 04:32 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 13:41 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 15:41 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-18 19:02 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 20:06 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-19 05:53 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-19 00:57 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:37 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-21 18:32 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 05:49 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-22 15:04 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-22 07:37 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. mariposas rand mair fheal <mair_fheal@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-22 00:48 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-22 09:20 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-22 02:29 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 09:04 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 18:54 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 11:23 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-23 02:35 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 07:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 18:59 +0100
Page 11 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 … 16 Next page →
| From | liquid <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-03 22:29 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa |
| Message-ID | <op.ydr6nwkdj514cl@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #559114 |
On Thu, 03 Mar 2016 21:44:55 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
> <news:op.ydrg32t8tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
> into the wood chipper again:
>
>> On Thu, 03 Mar 2016 02:54:04 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood
>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>> Projection from Cracky McCrackHead. LOL
>
>> projection from you.
>
> Projection of projection from Cracky McCrackHead. LOL
>
>>> Sure I proved it. The graph I provided a link to proved it.
>
>> and that MID is...
>
> You ran from it last time, because it proves you *wrong*. You'll run
> from it again because it proves you *wrong*. LOL
>
> Message-ID: <0387d742a9fa4b4ee5411fb285238a3d@dizum.com>
>
> SPNAK!
>
>>> But it's not like the Euler sinewave summation equation needs
>>> "proving",
>>> it's been the defacto means of summing sinewaves since the 18th
>>> century.
>>> You're just butthurt because your clockwork brain can't figure out
>>> that 200+ year old knowledge that every scientist and engineer has
>>> figured out on Day 1 of college... likely because you skipped that day
>>> to suck dicks in a back alley.
>>>
>>> <snicker>
>
> <crickets> LOL
>
>>> Except it's not. It's giving you shit results like the voltage between
>>> any two legs is 0, and by summing the phases together, it doubles the
>>> voltage, which would be akin to shorting the three phases together.
>>> Even you must realize how fucking stupid you sound, right? LOL
>
>> the irony is thick.
>
> The irony is you're so stupid you *still* think you're right, even
> after you've demonstrated time after time that you're *wrong*...
> because you're a mathematical moron. LOL
>
>>>> how come when i add two 120 degree phase-separated 60Hz 120V sine
>>>> waves
>>>> i just get another 60Hz 120V sine wave:
>
>>> Because you're a mathematical moron who can't wrap your crack-addled
>>> brain around that ultra-simple Euler sinewave summation equation,
>>> likely. LOL
>
>> it's no wonder you'd go about things the ULTRA SIMPLE way.
>>
>> seems fitting.
>
> You fucking moron, you're *supposed* to get a resultant of 120 volts,
> phase shifted to be 180 degrees out from the remaining phase, which is
> why all three phases summed together gives a result of 0. That you
> can't understand vector summation after more than 2 *months* of trying
> proves you're a mathematical moron. 50 IQ? LOL
>
> SPNAK!
>
>>>> http://i.imgur.com/nO3iCEd.png
>>>>
>>>> ...but if I subtract them i get an expected correct 208V 60Hz sine
>>>> wave,
>>>> fakey?
>
> Bwahahahaaa! DildoRider demonstrates yet again that he's a
> mathematical moron.
>
> <http://i.imgur.com/t0sO6xh.png>
>
> Blue - Phase 1 (170 volts, 0 degrees), Tributary 1
> Orange - Phase 2 (170 volts, 120 degrees), Tributary 2
> Purple - Phase 3 (170 volts, 240 degrees)
> Green - Resultant (170 volts, 60 degrees)
> Red - Resultant (170 volts, 60 degrees)
>
> You'll note the red/green sinewave and the purple sinewave are 180
> degrees out of phase, exactly as they should be.
>
> You'll further note that both the red and green sinewaves are at the
> same phase angle despite having the two phases interchanged in the
> equation (green - 0 degrees first, 120 degrees second; red - 120
> degrees first, 0 degrees second).
>
> You're a mathematical moron improperly using a kooky sinewave
> subtraction equation which gives you an improper result.
>
> SPNAK!
>
>>>> http://i.imgur.com/OPEeEJJ.png
>
>>> That's not what you k'lamed before, DildoRider. You were k'laming 0
>>> volts, remember?
>
>> 0V when you add them,
>
> When *you* use your kooky sinewave subtraction equation on the
> sinewaves, because it's fucked up... because your crackhead brain is
> fucked up. LOL
>
>> incorrectly going about measuring a voltage
>> difference, k0oky. that's why you hid your subtraction equations on
>> desmos.com and will never reveal them.
>
> I've already "revealed" them to you twice, you fecking moron. Now
> you'll have to dig back through all your retarded blather to find
> them, because morons should have to work harder to learn their
> lessons. LOL
>
> SPNAK!
>
>>> I've already proven the Euler sinewave summation equation is the
>>> correct equation to use, DildoRider, as has historical precedent.
>>> Vector summation is the *only* correct method. You'll note you're not
>>> summing vectors with your kooky sinewave subtraction equation, you're
>>> subtracting sines.
>
>> and below, you admit that my equation is only wrong if you fukk it up
>> royally like you take the time to demonstrate.
>
> I "admit" nothing of the sort. Your inability to perform that simple
> vector summation of an upwardly sloped 75 degree angle line and a
> downwardly sloped -45 degree angle line proves your fucked up sinewave
> subtraction equation is *wrong*, therefore you have been *wrong* about
> all the retardation you've blathered for more than two months.
>
> SPNAK!
>
>>> Let's do a simple test of your kooky sinewave subtraction equation,
>>> DildoRider. What is the result of a line at 75 degrees and a line at
>>> -45 degrees, according to your kooky sinewave subtraction equation?
>
>> a 240V 60Hz sine wave.
>
> Moron. LOL
>
>>> According to you, it'll be 75 - (-45) = 120 degrees, right? And that's
>>> *wrong*. Because you're a mathematical *moron*.
>
>> huh? you must be stupid as a brick.
>>
>> that's not how phases interact, k0oky.
>>
>> also -45 is 315 degrees... and also not once did i ever try to subtract
>> phase angles and expect anything but the answer to a subtraction. that
>> operation would not correspond to summing a sine wave.
>
> Bwahahahaaaa! "-45 degrees is 315 degrees"... you fecking moron. You
> couldn't grasp vector summation if someone held a gun to your head...
> likely a result of your decades of abusing crack, Cracky McCrackHead.
> LOL
>
> SPNAK!
>
>>>> did you see how trump is catching flak for all of his Nazi and KKK
>>>> fanbois? LOL
>
>>> You seem unnaturally interested in Nazis and the KKK, Robert Michael
>>> Wolfe of Pittsburgh, PA. That's likely why you've spent so much time
>>> on the StormFront website.
>
>> the only times i ended up on a stormfront website was from searching for
>> some of your k0okier k'lames such as the "planned parenthood = nazis =
>> liberal" k0okery you've spewed in the past.
>
> So you admit you've spent time on StormFront... because you're a
> libtard nazi KKK member, apparently. LOL
>
>> but, please don't let me interrupt you from exposing that you google my
>> name a lot. are you trying to make up for being busted k'laming that
>> you
>> stalked me at my home when you didn't, spankard?
>
> Proof, Loon? LOL
>
>>> Hey, DildoRider, WTF is this?
>>> <unitedskins.net/index.php/category/robert-wolfe/>
>>>
>>> I *knew* you were a skinhead at heart, you fucking nazi libtard
>>> bastard. Busted. LOL
>
> <crickets> LOL!
>
> Robert Michael Wolfe of Pittsburgh, PA is a skinhead nazi libtard.
> He's even got his own blog page on a skinhead site. LOL!
>
>>>>> It isn't. I also
>>>>> said you would have to properly graph it to determine the result,
>>>>> since it's a complex periodic sinusoid. You haven't. You can't.
>
>>>> except i did.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.desmos.com/calculator/icvhtewrtx
>>>>
>>>> \left(150*\sin (120*2*\pi *x)\right)+\left(20.25*\sin (33*2*\pi
>>>> *x)\right)+\left(1400*\sin (150*2*\pi *x)\right)+\left(20*\sin
>>>> (5013*2*\pi
>>>> *x)\right)+\left(600*\sin (13*2*\pi *x)\right)+\left(360*\sin
>>>> (1209*2*\pi
>>>> *x)\right)
>
>>> Bwahahahaa! You used your kooky sinewave subtraction equation and
>>> switched out the minus signs for plus signs.
>
>> well, you asked for a sum, not a voltage difference measurement.
>>
>> pity you don't know the difference (pun intended).
>
> You're using the wrong equation, you math-challenged moron. Because
> you can't understand vector summation, you math-challenged moron.
> Because you're a math-challenged moron, you math-challenged moron. LOL
>
> SPNAK!
>
>>> Because you're a mathematical moron. LOL
>
>> you seem to be very easily amused, snickers.
>
> You seem to be bootfucked by reality, DildoRider. Again. LOL
>
>>>> i e<SMACKAKOOK!>
>
>>> Your kooky sinewave subtraction equation is wrong, because you're too
>>> stupid to understand vector summation, DildoRider. Get right on
>>> subtracting 75 degrees and -45 degrees to prove yourself *wrong*.
>
>> i got a 240V 60Hz sine wave. what did you get besides made fun of for
>> your horrible bleatfarting strawman fiesta?
>
> It should be a 30 degree upwardly-sloping line, you fucking moron. But
> your kooky equation tells you that it's either 120 degrees or -120
> degrees... because you're a mathematical moron. LOL
>
> SPNAK!
>
>>>>> Now, you've k'lamed your kooky sinewave subtraction equation tells us
>>>>> that by shorting the three phases of 3-phase AC, there is a magical
>>>>> doubling of voltage... you'll be getting right on explaining and
>>>>> mathematically modeling exactly how your magical equation is able to
>>>>> violate Kirchhoff's Voltage Law and Watt's Law (not to mention common
>>>>> sense), or you'll admit you're a mathematical moron, and you have no
>>>>> clue how vector *summation* works.
>
>>>> this from the dumbass who perpetually thinks that the RMS of a
>>>> function
>>>> is a sine wave?
>
>>> Bwahahahaaa! DildoRider yet again k'lames RMS voltage is a constant,
>
>> as long as the AC voltage is constant, so is the RMS.
>
> Bwahahahaaaa! DildoRider k'lames AC voltage is "constant" as means of
> defending his kooky k'lame that RMS voltage is DC... therefore the
> entire electrical grid according to DildoRider is DC! What a *moron*!
> LOL
>
>>> IOW, a DC voltage. Yeah folks, DildoRider is *so* fucking stupid he
>>> thinks the 120 volt RMS coming out of every outlet in his house is DC.
>
>> nice strawman, k0ok! did you run out of things to backpedal from?
>> ...like 2550.25?
>
> Awwww, look at the bootfucked spankard going back to that which he's
> desperately clung for the past month as he's proven himself a bigger
> and bigger mathematical moron. Stop trying to divert attention away
> from the latest SPNAK!age you're receiving, DildoRider... you k'lame
> that RMS voltage is "constant" and therefore DC, and now you're
> k'laming *all* AC is "constant" and therefore DC... because you're a
> moron. LOL
>
> SPNAK!
>
>>>> so why how come phase A minus phase B produces a graph of the proper
>>>> 208V 60Hz sine wave and summation produces a nonsensical sum that is
>>>> the
>>>> inverse of phase C, o great sage fakey on top of your mountain of
>>>> "Fag.
>>>> LOL"?
>
>>> Because you're a mathematical moron using the wrong equation,
>>> DildoRider. You just happened upon a correct answer in one instance,
>>> whereas you've proven your equation is *wrong* most of the time...
>>> like when you k'lamed that measuring between two phases gives 0 volts,
>>> and shorting all three phases together *doubles* the voltage. Because
>>> you're a mathematical moron.
>>>
>>> If you were using the proper sinewave summation equation, you wouldn't
>>> see a phase shift when you switched things around.
>>>
>>> This is what your kooky sinewave subtraction equation gives if the two
>>> phases are switched in their positions in the equation:
>
>> good thing i'm not an idiot switching the phases like you!
>>
>> hey, nice bleaty tacit admission that it produces the correct sum and
>> graphs the correct sinewave unless you're and idiot and switch the
>> positions of the waves like you like to do.
>
> Bwahahahaaaa! You fecking moron, it doesn't matter which phase you put
> in the equation first if you're using the correct equation. Your
> equation is *wrong*, making you *wrong* about all the stupidity you've
> blathered for two months. When you switch the phases in your kooky
> equation, you get a different result, both results *wrong*. Because
> you're a mathematical moron who can't grasp vector summation to save
> your life. LOL
>
> SPNAK!
>
>>> 120.208\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot
>>> \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-120.208\left(\sin \left(2\cdot
>>> x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
>>> }{180}\right)\right)\right)
>>>
>>> 120.208\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot
>>> \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-120.208\left(\sin \left(2\cdot
>>> x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)
>>>
>>> Note the 120 degree phase shift. Do you think that happens in real
>>> life, DildoRider? No, it does not... therefore your kooky sinewave
>>> subtraction equation is flawed and therefore *wrong*.
>
>> it just did happen in real life:
>
> Bwahahahaaa! DildoRider admits his equation gives different results
> when the two phases are swapped in the equation, meaning it cannot be
> correct.
>
> SPNAK!
>
>> i posted the correct equation and the correct graph (which you've now
>> admitted) and now you are subtracting sinewaves wrong and trying to say
>> that i did.
>
> I've not admitted anything, you fecking moron. When two phases are
> added together, you get a resultant of the same amplitude that is 180
> degrees out of phase from the remaining phase, which is why summing
> all three phases gives a result of 0. Your kooky equation is giving
> you trash results, and you're far too stupid to know why or how to fix
> it... because you're a mathematical moron.
>
> SPNAK!
>
>> obviously, my equations aren't flawed... you are.
>
> Obviously not only are your equations flawed, so is your crackhead
> brain, DildoRider. LOL
>
>>>> could...could these sine waves *maybe* actually correspond to the
>>>> physical properties of 3-phase electricity?
>
>>> So you're saying that depending upon which test lead you connect from
>>> the meter to the hot leg first, you'll get a phase shift of 120
>>> degrees, according to your kooky sinewave subtraction equation...
>
>> no, that's what you just did.
>
> No, that's what your kooky sinewave subtraction equation just did...
> because you're a mathematical moron. LOL
>
>>> and you *must* k'lame that a 75 degree line and a -45 degree line
>>> combined
>>> is 120 degrees, or -120 degrees if you switch to -45 degree line and
>>> 75 degree line (switch the two lines in your kooky sinewave
>>> subtraction equation). When in reality, it's 30 degrees. Always.
>>> Moron.
>
>> just who in the fuck has a 75 degree line and a -45 aka 315 (360-45=315)
>> degree line, spanky?
>>
>> show me the transformer that outputs that!
>
> But... but... but DildoRider, 75 - 315 = -240 degrees, which would be
> a downwardly sloping line of 120 degrees. You mathematical moron. So
> according to you, lines can magically change their slope!
>
> But... but... but DildoRider, it's not 45, it's -45, so your kooky
> equation would be 360 - (-45) = 405 degrees = 45 degrees. You
> mathematical moron. So according to you, lines can magically change
> their direction!
>
> You can't grasp vector summation to save your life.
>
> SPNAK!
>
>>> Because you're the mathematical moron who can't grasp vector summation
>>> to save his life.
>>>
>>> Bwahahahaa! DildoRider k'lames an upward 75 degree angle and a
>>> downward -45 degree angle gives a result of 120 degrees! And a
>>> downward -45 degree angle and an upward 75 degree angle gives a result
>>> of -120 degrees!
>
>> no i didn't. you did, spanky.
>
> No, your kooky equation does. You just proved it above. Spankard.
>
>> so fucked in the head that you're building strawmen while at the same
>> time
>> admitting that my equations works unless you use it fucktarded-backwards
>> like you just did.
>
> You can't even add an upwardly sloped 75 degree angle line and a
> downwardly sloped -45 degree angle line with your kooky sinewave
> subtraction equation, DildoRider. It's giving you trash results.
> You're *wrong*, just accept that fact. Even LunkHead's explained it to
> you, but you're far too thickwitted to understand why you're Robert
> Michael Wolfe of Pittsburgh, PA the Mathematical Moron and The Worst
> Maker of Sinewaves in Usenet History.
>
> SPNAK!
>
> Fag. LOL
> Idiot. LOL
> Moron. LOL
> Tranny. LOL
> Libtard. LOL
> Crackhead. LOL
> GableTard. LOL
> DildoRider. LOL
> Bad Musician. LOL
> Stick Figure. LOL
> Terrible Liar. LOL
> Obsessed Retard. LOL
> Sinewave Spammer. LOL
> Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
> Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
> Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
> Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
> Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
> Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
> Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
>
look at bleaty bleat.
--
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
on page 2:
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
-
snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
compiles with:
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
run with:
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*
Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
That's how stupid you are.
Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-01 11:52 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa |
| Message-ID | <l4pbdb15tlvtrbvdtnocu84fq8j8aa5ia9@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #558345 |
On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 19:26:28 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > >Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded LibTard, in ><news:nb4frt$f6f$2@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the >wood chipper again: > >> On 01/03/2016 2:05 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler >> Emeritus wrote: > >>> Moron has raped Google again and thinks he sounds intelligent stupidly >>> blathering out shit he does not and cannot understand. > >> Why > >Posthumping... kooksign. *says the* post humping attention whore. > >> are you talking about yourself in the third person, ko0ky? > >IKYABWAI... kooksign. Ironic > >> Wait -- wasn't that one of the next symptoms of mental breakdown we were >> predicting you'd undergo, after you started forgetting which posts you'd >> already replied to and replying twice to some posts, and then started >> talking to yourself? > >Fanfic... kooksign. Again Ironic. > >Getting your stupid ass drop-kicked across usenet on every single >topic you've blathered about... kooksign. Poof kookie? > >Why can't you refute the SPNAK!age you took, as outlined in my .sig, >Spankard? > Everyone knows your sig is made up spin dryed bullshit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 06:30 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa |
| Message-ID | <33df607f14dc1c8e4fe81d6d1660da16@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #558358 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Trailer Trash Tony the Law-Breaking Scam-Running Drug-Dealing Wife-Beating Child-Endangering Tax-Evading Unemployable Racist High-School-Dropout Needle-Tracked Drug-Addled Alcoholic Pissbum (aka Tony Ray Rawlings, aka Anton Ray Eaks of 600 Raintree Blvd #58, Lamplighter Trailer Park, Canon City, CO), socked up as Skeeter, in <news:l4pbdb15tlvtrbvdtnocu84fq8j8aa5ia9@4ax.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 19:26:28 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood > Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded LibTard, in >> <news:nb4frt$f6f$2@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the >> wood chipper again: >>> On 01/03/2016 2:05 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler >>> Emeritus wrote: >>>> Moron has raped Google again and thinks he sounds intelligent stupidly >>>> blathering out shit he does not and cannot understand. >>> Why >> Posthumping... kooksign. > *says the* post humping attention whore. Posthumping... kooksign. >>> are you talking about yourself in the third person, ko0ky? >> IKYABWAI... kooksign. > Ironic IKYABWAI... kooksign. >>> Wait -- wasn't that one of the next symptoms of mental breakdown we were >>> predicting you'd undergo, after you started forgetting which posts you'd >>> already replied to and replying twice to some posts, and then started >>> talking to yourself? >> Fanfic... kooksign. > Again Ironic. More IKYABWAI... more kooksign. >> Getting your stupid ass drop-kicked across usenet on every single >> topic you've blathered about... kooksign. > Poof kookie? ProofLooning... kooksign. >> Why can't you refute the SPNAK!age you took, as outlined in my .sig, >> Spankard? > Everyone knows your sig is made up spin dryed bullshit. Fanfic... kooksign. SPNAK! on the single-wide trailer-monkey Pissbum. > <http://imgur.com/xt9bcTq> > > I were a execyootive reegunal sailes man making deleverys. > Now I are a toofless unemployalbe pissbum. <snicker> > I just found out today. Maybe a year. I love you all. > My shits fucked up anyboby givs a damn? No. Lying Drug-Abusing Woman-Beating Pissbum Trailer Trash Tony Ray Eaks. <snicker> -- Proof that Lamey (aka Skeeter) is Anton Ray Eaks: Message-ID: <kus7dj$bh0$1@news.mixmin.net> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topicsearchin/alt.usenet.kooks/messageid$3Akus7dj$24bh0$241@news.mixmin.net/alt.usenet.kooks/MLAQo_O73UM> Pissbum hard at work to earn his drug-money: <http://i.imgur.com/hr4eMvS.jpg> <--- LOL! Just say no to drugs and alcohol, kids! <http://i.imgur.com/uoZbsGI.jpg> <--- LOL! It's Howdy Doody Time!: <http://i.imgur.com/1myBylb.jpg> <--- LOL! The Pissbum Clan: <http://i.imgur.com/cixImyq.jpg> <--- LOL! MID: <81670ab47076fa4432bc62e70914ee31@dizum.com> Thanks for admitting you live in single-wide trailer #58 at the Lamp Lighter Mobile Home Park on Raintree Boulevard in Canon City, Colorado, Pissbum. LOL <https://web.archive.org/web/20150301045717/http://coloradovoters.info/by_number/0005/59023_anton_ray_eaks.html> <https://web.archive.org/web/20150224004840/http://coloradovoters.info/by_address/81212.html> 600 Raintree Blvd. #58 Canon City, CO 81212 Another single-wide? Of course it is... the Lamp Lighter Mobile Home Park only has single-wide trailers. LOL And you get caught in your "I don't do FaceBook" lie again, not to mention your "I'm not Tony Eaks" lie: A drug-addled loserly pissbum wrote: Message-ID: <c30abe10716ad5092ff377450c199bae@dizum.com> "It's dump day today, woke up to fire trucks across the street, seems the house caught fire. What a view I have now...LOL" <https://www.facebook.com/CanonCityDailyRecord?hc_location=timeline> "Tony Eaks - Right across the street from me, Woke up to flames and lights." <https://web.archive.org/web/20150122055700/http://www.canoncitydailyrecord.com/ci_27053304/early-morning-fire-destroys-home-at-lamp-lighter> And before he was a Canon City, CO single-wide trailer-dwelling unemployable pissbum, he was a Fairplay, CO single-wide trailer-dwelling unemployable pissbum. LOL In Fairplay, CO he mooched his mother to an early death... now he's mooching his ultra-ugly transsexual Howdy Doody wife Beverly Jean Johnson-Eaks, who is forced to work two minimum-wage jobs (cashier at Alco, cashier at Dollar Tree) to support Trailer Trash Tony's drug habit. LOL Message-ID: <96a8a62d10d76cd522bcf86bbaef274d@dizum.com> Message-ID: <91a9d7e35f68d22eef5b72f79ef505c0@dizum.com> Unit 66. Trailer Trash Tony is a single-wide pissbum! Bwahahahaaa! ============================================================ Trailer Trash Tony wrote: > Can you prove this single wide trailer thing? Or is it > just another attempt to try and "act" better than me? LOL Yeah, I can now prove "this single wide trailer thing", Trailer Trash Tony. Which by your own admission makes me better than you. LOL So I was right about everything I wrote about you... which makes you a pissbum, Pissbum. LOL <https://web.archive.org/web/20140724093727/http://coloradovoters.info/0005/59023.html> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Anton Ray Eaks was born in 1953 and he registered to vote, giving his address as 21980 HWY 285 UNIT 66, FAIRPLAY, PARK COUNTY, COLORADO 80440. His telephone number is 1-719-477-3574. His voting status is: Active. He is unaffiliated. RESIDENTIAL_ADDRESS: 21980 HWY 285 UNIT 66 RESIDENTIAL_CITY: FAIRPLAY RESIDENTIAL_STATE: CO RESIDENTIAL_ZIP_CODE: 80440 REGISTRATION_DATE: 07/31/2012 BIRTH_YEAR: 1953 PHONE_NUM: 719-477-3574 MAILING_ADDRESS_1: PO BOX 473 MAILING_CITY: FAIRPLAY MAILING_STATE: CO MAILING_ZIP_CODE: 80440 MAILING_ZIP_PLUS: 0473 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ NOTE: That phone number is the Alcoholics Anonymous hot-line at South Park Christian Chapel: <https://web.archive.org/web/20150131161807/http://www.southparkevents.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=48:on-going-activities-for-the-month-&catid=1:latest-news&Itemid=54> "Alcoholics Anonymouis meeting 7-8pm at So Pk Christian Chapel 719-477-3574" Trailer Trash Tony is *such* a drunkard that when he registered to vote, he put down the AA DrunkieLine as his phone number! LOL A map of the gravel quarry / junkyard / trailer park where Trailer Trash Tony rented his shitty single-wide trailer for only $675 / month (and still couldn't pay the rent, and got evicted! LOL): <https://www.google.com/maps/place/21980+Hwy+285+%2366,+Fairplay,+CO+80440/@39.2157874,-105.9922529,346m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m2!3m1!1s0x876ae8155a400885:0xfb9ff5490348163d> Unit 66: This is a 3 bd/2ba single-wide trailer. <https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.318572058245476.1073741834.131803693588981&type=1&_fb_noscript=1> SPANKY-SPANKY! (tm) <snicker> ============================================================ Lamey (aka Skeeter) the alcoholic wife-beating outer-filthing drug-addict: Message-ID: <lfjfe7$b3t$4@news.mixmin.net> Message-ID: <1b7ef90407a4295786c3f1338e80d553@dizum.com> Message-ID: <c39bc1cce43a9e6860b642e72943f3ce@dizum.com> Message-ID: <ae39676e2ac093e5259ccf8210ecbb25@dizum.com> Trailer Trash Tony makes a multi-pronged confession: MID: <k9m2ca5g26l46qb2t9h05ff87skcjiov1o@4ax.com> "Yup, I can take 4 or 5 percs and roof your house. It's called the paradoxical affect." Pissbum groveled. LOL Pissbum lost. LOL! Message-ID: <lchuas$q96$4@news.mixmin.net> Message-ID: <c92bbbbfefed840db0563eb29f2d6498@dizum.com> Cowardly Pissbum gets caught in lie after lie. LOL! Message-ID: <l0rfde$hv8$2@news.mixmin.net> Message-ID: <l0smsq$fcq$2@news.mixmin.net> Lamey (aka Skeeter) the forger, busted and scrambling for cover like a coward: <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.usenet.kooks/2oWKmfnSPEA/RE_35HZp8qAJ> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.usenet.kooks/2oWKmfnSPEA/-RZxQp6TAe4J> Message-ID: <db92667a7bac368fab1b8ff5085f8b2e@dizum.com> Pissbum gets kicked so hard he's *still* bouncing around Usenet like a SuperBall: ============================================ Message-ID: <kv42gb$vd8$1@news.mixmin.net> <https://groups.google.com/forum/message/raw?msg=alt.usenet.kooks/ZyzzhJiku3c/Q0c2J9_Jc5YJ> Message-ID: <kuatrj$b2g$1@news.mixmin.net> <https://groups.google.com/forum/message/raw?msg=alt.usenet.kooks/N91lSABoN2s/JYDwKwwIZn4J> ============================================ Trailer Trash Tony the Single-Wide Trailer-Dwelling Pissbum is driven so insane by my truthiness that he's forced by his psychiatric professional to take Seroquel, a strong anti-psychotic that its maker (Astra Zeneca) only indicates for use in treating schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: ================================================== Lamey (aka Skeeter) admits he now takes Seroquel "to sleep"... it's a prescription medication for the treatment of mania and depression associated with bipolar disease and schizophrenia. I've driven him mad. LOL Pissbum tries to k'lame his doctor-recommended dosage is only half of the smallest tablet Astra Zeneca produces for Seroquel: MID: <3elg2aduthcn6j92jlledhg6sa4ibnbro1@4ax.com>: "Just like seriquil, I take it for sleep at night, 12.5 mg" I shred Pissbum Tony's lies and prove he's gone batty: MID: <0c4a46b95e1b8983104047001ec4e05f@dizum.com> MID: <11715d7d5e802fb4248513f981621812@dizum.com> MID: <3bb2754531e630d89eb7330623ee6281@dizum.com> MID: <8bc988e4842e4338432ad962f84a89d4@dizum.com> ==================================================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-01 00:14 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa |
| Message-ID | <nb3j1s$1mk$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #558196 |
x-no-archive: yes On 2/29/2016 8:41 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded LibTard, in > <news:nb347m$279$2@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the > wood chipper again: > >> On 29/02/2016 2:10 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler >> Emeritus wrote: > >>>> Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive >>>> and 2 negative. No anomaly there. > >>> Bwahahahaaa! H2O "is tetrahedral". > >> Aww, does ko0ky not know about the electron pairs that jut out from an >> H2O molecule at the other two points of a tetrahedron from where the >> hydrogens are? > > Bwahahaaa! LunkHead k'lames the electrons are what constitutes the > fourth leg to complete the tetrahedron in water. Perhaps LunkHead > doesn't know the difference between electrons and atoms, which would > explain his stupidly blathering that molecules are > "flying-and-bouncing-around-the-place" (LunkHead's words) in a solid. > LOL! > > Holy fuck, LunkHead... don't you ever get tired of being proven to be > a know-nothing nong? You've already proven there's no fucking way you > could possibly be an astrophysicist, you can stop campaigning for > Science Spankard of the Year. LOL > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetrahedral_molecular_geometry> > "In a tetrahedral molecular geometry, a central atom is located at the > center with four substituents that are located at the corners of a > tetrahedron." > > The old, discredited models of water considered water a tetrahedron > because of the inter-molecular hydrogen bonding creating a water > cluster, you halfwitted slopebrow. And even then, they had to qualify > that by saying it's a distorted tetrahedron. > > But tetradedrality denotes an _individual_ molecule, LunkHead, not a > fucking cluster of molecules... because where does the cluster stop? > There are 128 molecule clusters of water that are icosahedral in > nature... under your retarded metric, it could be argued that every > drop of water in the ocean is a giant fucking geometric shape the size > and shape of the planet with a bottom contour that just so happens to > coincidentally match the contours of the ocean floor. > > Moron. > > <snicker> > > Message-ID: <a76a23be8f4a22ea6c31dde5b3e2dd8c@dizum.com> > ======================================================== > ======================================================== > <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.usenet.kooks/yhNtCQr1rpE/GlDtnrGgMxsJ> > <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=145664837800> > > From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> > Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks > Subject: Re: A REVIEW: How much does Keith "Murphy" McElroy suck at > this Usenet thing? > Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 00:58:29 +0000 (UTC) > Message-ID: <km1mfl$t4j$7@dont-email.me> > Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; > posting-host="67.70.58.178"; > Summary: Murphy is a kook with hundreds, if not thousands, of sock > puppets > Keywords: Murphy > X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118 > ======================================================== > ======================================================== > > Nadegda got outed as that lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard Paul > Derbyshire by Ray Banana. When LunkHead learned of this, he > immediately started backpedaling and k'laming that "Nadegda" was > actually just "vacationing" in Pembroke. LOL! > > Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com> > ======================================================== > ======================================================== >> <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800> > > Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by > coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda, > apparently. > > And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team > on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole. > > Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch > anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to > it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared > between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his > f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in > getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her > mouth! > > Oh, here's Kensi: > <http://goo.gl/hdpXFC> > > She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy? > I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice. > > Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right > thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too. > > <https://goo.gl/sbdRcq> > > You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to > say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls > "sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go > kinky. LOL > >> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ> > >> P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited >> any good telescopes lately? > > Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control > capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right? > > <snicker> She discovered a planet, don't you remember?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-01 20:18 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa |
| Message-ID | <98c9b1a61f015196bf5186c8716cf275@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #558236 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Janithor, in <news:nb3j1s$1mk$1@news.albasani.net> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On 2/29/2016 8:41 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler > Emeritus wrote: >> Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded LibTard, in >> <news:nb347m$279$2@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the >> wood chipper again: >>> On 29/02/2016 2:10 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler >>> Emeritus wrote: >>>>> Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive >>>>> and 2 negative. No anomaly there. >>>> Bwahahahaaa! H2O "is tetrahedral". >>> Aww, does ko0ky not know about the electron pairs that jut out from an >>> H2O molecule at the other two points of a tetrahedron from where the >>> hydrogens are? >> Bwahahaaa! LunkHead k'lames the electrons are what constitutes the >> fourth leg to complete the tetrahedron in water. Perhaps LunkHead >> doesn't know the difference between electrons and atoms, which would >> explain his stupidly blathering that molecules are >> "flying-and-bouncing-around-the-place" (LunkHead's words) in a solid. >> LOL! >> >> Holy fuck, LunkHead... don't you ever get tired of being proven to be >> a know-nothing nong? You've already proven there's no fucking way you >> could possibly be an astrophysicist, you can stop campaigning for >> Science Spankard of the Year. LOL >> >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetrahedral_molecular_geometry> >> "In a tetrahedral molecular geometry, a central atom is located at the >> center with four substituents that are located at the corners of a >> tetrahedron." >> >> The old, discredited models of water considered water a tetrahedron >> because of the inter-molecular hydrogen bonding creating a water >> cluster, you halfwitted slopebrow. And even then, they had to qualify >> that by saying it's a distorted tetrahedron. >> >> But tetradedrality denotes an _individual_ molecule, LunkHead, not a >> fucking cluster of molecules... because where does the cluster stop? >> There are 128 molecule clusters of water that are icosahedral in >> nature... under your retarded metric, it could be argued that every >> drop of water in the ocean is a giant fucking geometric shape the size >> and shape of the planet with a bottom contour that just so happens to >> coincidentally match the contours of the ocean floor. >> >> Moron. >> >> <snicker> > She discovered a planet, don't you remember? LunkHead: "Eureka! I've discovered Myanus! It's gaseous!" <snicker> Message-ID: <a76a23be8f4a22ea6c31dde5b3e2dd8c@dizum.com> ======================================================== ======================================================== <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.usenet.kooks/yhNtCQr1rpE/GlDtnrGgMxsJ> <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=145664837800> From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks Subject: Re: A REVIEW: How much does Keith "Murphy" McElroy suck at this Usenet thing? Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 00:58:29 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <km1mfl$t4j$7@dont-email.me> Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="67.70.58.178"; Summary: Murphy is a kook with hundreds, if not thousands, of sock puppets Keywords: Murphy X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118 ======================================================== ======================================================== Nadegda got outed as that lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard Paul Derbyshire by Ray Banana. When LunkHead learned of this, he immediately started backpedaling and k'laming that "Nadegda" was actually just "vacationing" in Pembroke. LOL! Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com> ======================================================== ======================================================== > <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800> Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda, apparently. And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole. Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her mouth! Oh, here's Kensi: <http://goo.gl/hdpXFC> She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy? I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice. Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too. <https://goo.gl/sbdRcq> You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls "sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go kinky. LOL > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ> > P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited > any good telescopes lately? Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right? <snicker> ======================================================== ======================================================== I note you've studiously avoided answering which observatories have time standard control capability, LunkHead... only those who actually work at an observatory would even know about such a thing, let alone which observatories have that capability... but then, everyone knows lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy wannabes always out their womanly socks because they're too stoooopid to play the part of the identity they've assumed. Perhaps for your next sock, you should play the part of a mop jockey or a streetwalker... that'd be something you could handle, dude. <snicker> -- Kensi the moron wrote: ================================ The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so the curvature is 4*pi ================================ Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi. Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi Therefore, r = 0.28209479176 Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the units. The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect. Kensi the moron was corrected: ================================ Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you backpedal, LunkHead. You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore = (4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original "The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*? ================================ But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry problems. Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is "science fiction" and "a howler". In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold. He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature, and thus causing gravity to *repel*. Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of magnetic attraction. Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work, and therefore a universe which could not exist. Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation". Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow at 489 F. Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of "blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how spectral absorption and emission works. Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same moron continues to cling to his delusions. Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite. Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's intelligent... and failing badly. That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that struggles (and fails) to understand reality.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-01 13:34 -0700 |
| Subject | Fakey see's the light. |
| Message-ID | <u6vbdb5oevl5lufiq0a852iuhbjloknku1@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #558382 |
On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 20:18:41 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >I've discovered Myanus! It's gaseous
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-01 05:46 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa |
| Message-ID | <230fdc3806a6ca5c7f66fa356765d72a@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #557951 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in <news:ih89db58srbnoj0uomknjupsni1na7dmvc@4ax.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: Froups desnecked, Coward. Are you afraid people will see what a moron you are? LOL > FNVWe stomped a moron's brain flat. Again: >> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in >>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus >>> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >>>> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in >>>>> FNVWe wrote: >>>>>> How is a photon of *lower* energy going to excite a molecule of >>>>>> *higher* energy, LunkHead? Or to restate the question, why are the >>>>>> Laws of Thermodynamics *still* kicking your moronic ass? Or to restate >>>>>> the question, why can't you wrap your puny little brain around the >>>>>> concept of entropy? >>>>>> >>>>>> SPNAK! >>>>> So a microwave oven, with an operating frequency of 2.45 >>>>> Ghz, can't possibly warm food that's at room temperature. >>>> Sure it can, due to the anomalous dipolar nature of water, if water >>>> wasn't dipolar, Cowardly snipping noted, Coward. Are you afraid people will see what a moron you are? LOL >>> Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive >>> and 2 negative. No anomaly there. Bwahahaha! Water "has 4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative.". What a moron! >> Bwahahahaaa! H2O "is tetrahedral". >> >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetrahedral_molecular_geometry> >> Moron says water is H4O! Which is a physical impossibility, given >> electrostatic charges precluding that particular molecular >> arrangement. It won't even form H4O^2+ because the protons would have >> to double up, which is energetically expensive. > Water molecules are tetrahedral. Bwahahaaaaaa! What a fucking moron. Only in the context of non-bonding pair water clusters would it be even remotely considered tetrahedral, and even in that regard you're wrong, as that model of the water molecule has long ago been disproved. So you did a Google search for "anomalous properties of water" because like a good little automaton you did exactly as your Usenet Lord and Master commanded. You came across: <http://www.chem1.com/acad/webtext/states/water.html>, a web page you don't understand... you read "tetrahedral" and immediately ran to Usenet to bleat that big word out in the hopes you'd sound like you're intelligent, and in the process made yourself look like a fucking idiot. Again. LOL In point of fact, had you bothered to read further, you'd have realized that under that old, disproved molecular model water was considered a *distorted* tetrahedral due to the fact that four water molecules form a hydrogen-bonded cluster, with their ideal bond angles at 104.52 degrees. But the 5-point molecular models which led to the belief that water clusters are tetrahedrally arranged have been debunked because they failed to adequately describe hydrogen bonding. To be technically correct, you'd have to say water dynamic heterogeneities are approximately trigonally, nearly planarly, arranged with bond angles at 109.47 degrees, having sp^2-hybridized electron pairs, which combine into icosahedral super-heterogeneities. This model not only fully explains hydrogen bonding, but the electrostatic potential distribution which accounts for the O--O dimer and further accurately models the radial distribution function as embodied in the observed diffraction pattern of liquid water. But the individual water molecule is dipolar, with one strongly electronegative (8+) oxygen and two weakly electronegative (1+) hydrogens, said dipolar nature arising due to the O-H bond angle. And that still doesn't explain your stupidly blathering: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative." Water has *no* "negative poles", and it most certainly doesn't have "4 poles", you witless turd. You'll be getting right on diagramming your fictional "4 pole" water, Moron. SPNAK! > You are too stupid to understand the reason. > I will simply laugh at your foolishness in contradicting > your superiors. Translation: "Now that I've blathered that stupidity, I have to defend it... but I can't, so I'll blather more stupidity." "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative." Bwahahahahaaaaa! What a moron! > Come back when you google something you can't understand > that you think will refute me, so i can chastise you again. Translation: "Gawd, I hope he explains it to me. In small words. Because I'm a moron." LOL > Oh, BTW, electrons don't "orbit". Only simplistic wannabes > think that. I didn't say they did. Moron. It's a wave function, but each orbital is quantized into shells and subshells... and I'm sure you have no idea of the underlying reason why that is, or why electrons (which are most definitely *not* waves, given that they have rest mass of 9.11e-31 kg and are thus matter) exhibit wave-like behavior. Because you're a moron. LOL > -- > "3-phase AC power constitutes a closed loop!" > --Fakey demonstrates his mastery of Kirchoff's Law <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phasor> <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/Unfasor.gif> Message-ID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com> ========================================================= <http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/> See the animations about 1/4th down the page? Yeah, those are Fourier transforms transforming circles to sine waves in real time... and in the process smearing egg on your stoooopid face. LOL <http://muller.research.engineering.cornell.edu/sites/WEELS/summer06/Fourier%20Transforms-2D.pdf> 2D Fourier transform of a circularly symmetric function translates to Bessinc shape in 2-D, translates in 1-D to a sinewave. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourier_transform> "Still further generalization is possible to functions on groups, which, besides the original Fourier transform on R or R" (viewed as groups under addition), notably includes the discrete-time Fourier transform (DTFT, group = Z), the discrete Fourier transform (DFT, group = Z mod N) and the Fourier series or *circular* *Fourier* *transform* (group = S^1, the unit circle ~ closed finite interval with endpoints identified). The latter is routinely employed to handle periodic functions." <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periodic_function> You know, periodic functions... like sinewaves. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_and_cosine_transforms> "In mathematics, the Fourier sine and cosine transforms are forms of the Fourier integral transform that do not use complex numbers." Gee.. that *Fourier* *sine* *transform* sure looks familiar, doesn't it? <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_and_cosine_transforms> "Relation with complex exponentials: The form of the Fourier transform used more often today is... Euler's Formula" Why, that's the exact equation I used to properly graph 170 volt peak 3-phase, which translates to 120.208 volt RMS L-N and 208.207 volt RMS L-L. I guess that's why they're called the Euler-Fourier Formulas. <http://i.imgur.com/NrZzxlb.png> SPNAK! ========================================================= Aren't you the *moron* who k'lamed that Fourier transforms had nothing to do with the Euler sinewave summation equation? Yeah... yeah you are. Spankard. Moron. LOL -- Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know: ===================================== The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*); That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms; That superposition is the same as wave interference; That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves; That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things; That RMS isn't a DC voltage; That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L; That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1; The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave; That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical engineering, physics and control systems engineering; What a positive or negative vector is; That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero; That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic"; That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron. And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph. ===================================== SPNAK! <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-01 08:44 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa |
| Message-ID | <735bd043138252f72f88aeaa300907fd@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #558198 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in <news:1vaadb5eiq0ncckufv5a2jgumif2pu7qd6@4ax.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: Froups desnecked, Cowardly Moron. > FNVWe stomped a moron's brain flat. Again: >> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in >> >> FNVWe stomped a moron's brain flat. Again: >>>> Bwahahahaaa! H2O "is tetrahedral". >>>> >>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetrahedral_molecular_geometry> >>>> Moron says water is H4O! Which is a physical impossibility, given >>>> electrostatic charges precluding that particular molecular >>>> arrangement. It won't even form H4O^2+ because the protons would have >>>> to double up, which is energetically expensive. >>> Water molecules are tetrahedral. >> Bwahahaaaaaa! What a fucking moron. Only in the context of non-bonding >> pair water clusters would it be even remotely considered tetrahedral, >> and even in that regard you're wrong, as that model of the water >> molecule has long ago been disproved. >> >> So you did a Google search for "anomalous properties of water" because >> like a good little automaton you did exactly as your Usenet Lord and >> Master commanded. > I didn't have to search anything, dufus, because i already > know water molecules are tetrahedral. Oh, sure ya did. You've demonstrated you don't know jack shit about jack shit, but you're magically an expert on a discredited water model. If you were so "up" on water models, you'd have realized your knowledge is out of date, and you'd have shut your stupid gob, Moron. SPNAK! > I did, however, go to > your wikipedia cite above, which you must not have > understood, because it shows you are wrong. Wrong. The old water model that presumed molecular tetrahedrality has been discredited. And that Wikipedia web page thinks a three-atom molecule can somehow exhibit tetrahedrality, which it cannot do except in that old, discredited water model you desperately cling to. And that's in a water *cluster*, whereas tetrahedrality is based upon individual _molecules_. Moron. SPNAK! Message-ID: <230fdc3806a6ca5c7f66fa356765d72a@dizum.com> ========================================================= To be technically correct, you'd have to say water dynamic heterogeneities are approximately trigonally, nearly planarly, arranged with bond angles at 109.47 degrees, having sp^2-hybridized electron pairs, which combine into icosahedral super-heterogeneities. This model not only fully explains hydrogen bonding, but the electrostatic potential distribution which accounts for the O--O dimer and further accurately models the radial distribution function as embodied in the observed diffraction pattern of liquid water. But the individual water molecule is dipolar, with one strongly electronegative (8+) oxygen and two weakly electronegative (1+) hydrogens, said dipolar nature arising due to the O-H bond angle. And that still doesn't explain your stupidly blathering: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative." Water has *no* "negative poles", and it most certainly doesn't have "4 poles", you witless turd. You'll be getting right on diagramming your fictional "4 pole" water, Moron. SPNAK! ========================================================= <http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/cluster_evidence.html> <http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/clusters_overview.html#icos> ========================================================== This structuring accommodates explanation of many of the anomalous properties of water including its temperature-density and pressure-viscosity behavior, the radial distribution pattern, the presence of both cyclic pentamers and hexamers, the change in properties on supercooling and the solvation and hydration properties of ions, hydrophobic molecules, carbohydrates and macromolecules. ========================================================== IOW, the icosahedral model of water comes closer to accurately modeling all the anomalous behaviors of water than any other of the dozens of water models, one of which you've chosen... a long discredited model. Oh, you didn't even know you'd chosen a water model to bleat about, did you? Because you had no idea what a water model even was. Because you're a moron. <snicker> SPNAK! -- Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know: ===================================== The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*); That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms; That superposition is the same as wave interference; That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves; That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things; That RMS isn't a DC voltage; That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L; That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1; The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave; That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical engineering, physics and control systems engineering; What a positive or negative vector is; That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero; That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic"; That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron. And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph. ===================================== SPNAK! <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-03 06:46 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa |
| Message-ID | <8736cc4428671be87deaa9e956686c55@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #558235 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in <news:jraedb50dojn8nsljig83grsqkvacgmtr4@4ax.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: Froups desnecked, Cowardly Moron. > FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again: >> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in >>>>>> Bwahahahaaa! H2O "is tetrahedral". >>>>>> >>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetrahedral_molecular_geometry> >>>>>> Moron says water is H4O! Which is a physical impossibility, given >>>>>> electrostatic charges precluding that particular molecular >>>>>> arrangement. It won't even form H4O^2+ because the protons would have >>>>>> to double up, which is energetically expensive. >>>>> Water molecules are tetrahedral. >>>> Bwahahaaaaaa! What a fucking moron. Only in the context of non-bonding >>>> pair water clusters would it be even remotely considered tetrahedral, >>>> and even in that regard you're wrong, as that model of the water >>>> molecule has long ago been disproved. >>>> >>>> So you did a Google search for "anomalous properties of water" because >>>> like a good little automaton you did exactly as your Usenet Lord and >>>> Master commanded. >>> I didn't have to search anything, dufus, because i already >>> know water molecules are tetrahedral. >> Oh, sure ya did. You've demonstrated you don't know jack shit about >> jack shit, but you're magically an expert on a discredited water >> model. If you were so "up" on water models, you'd have realized your >> knowledge is out of date, and you'd have shut your stupid gob, Moron. >> >> SPNAK! >>> I did, however, go to >>> your wikipedia cite above, which you must not have >>> understood, because it shows you are wrong. >> Wrong. The old water model that presumed molecular tetrahedrality has >> been discredited. And that Wikipedia web page thinks a three-atom >> molecule can somehow exhibit tetrahedrality, which it cannot do except >> in that old, discredited water model you desperately cling to. And >> that's in a water *cluster*, whereas tetrahedrality is based upon >> individual _molecules_. Moron. > LOL! YOU, faketard, cited that Wikipedia article to try to > claim water isn't tetrahedral. Now you're crabwalking > furiously backwards to disavow your own cite. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VSEPR_theory#AXE_method> "Bent (H2O)" You'll note the VSEPR theory does *not* classify water as tetrahedral. SPNAK! <http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/water_molecule.html#lp> "Early 5-point molecular models, with explicit negative charge where the lone pairs are purported to be, fared poorly in describing hydrogen bonding, but more recent models show some promise. Although there is no apparent consensus of opinion [116], such descriptions of substantial sp3-hybridized lone pairs in the isolated water molecule should perhaps be avoided [117], as an sp2-hybridized structure (plus a pz orbital) is indicated. This rationalizes the formation of (almost planar) trigonal hydrogen bonding that can be found around some restricted sites in the hydration of proteins and where the numbers of hydrogen bond donors and acceptors are unequal." <http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/water_molecule.html#lp> "The molecule is clearly not spherical, however, with about a ±5% variation in van der Waals diameter dependent on the axis chosen; approximately tetrahedrally placed slight indentations being apparent opposite the (putative) electron pairs." IOW, you read the word "tetrahedral", thought it'd make you sound like less of a moron, so you ran to Usenet to bleat that word, without realizing that's merely a description of the geometry of the electron distribution using the hydrogen atoms as landmarks. It is *not* the molecular geometry. Aren't you the moron who k'lamed: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative." Bwahahaha. So wrong you're not even wrong. There's not a correct word in those two sentences. SPNAK! > Don't you get headaches from skull-cracking yourself? > Awwww... i guess not! What a bozo. Awww, look at the fecking moron projecting up a bleatfart-filled storm. LOL SPNAK! -- Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know: ===================================== The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*); That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms; That superposition is the same as wave interference; That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves; That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things; That RMS isn't a DC voltage; That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L; That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1; The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave; That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical engineering, physics and control systems engineering; What a positive or negative vector is; That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero; That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic"; That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron. That water does not have negative poles. The oxygen has an electronegativity of 8+, the hydrogens 1+. And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph. ===================================== SPNAK! <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-01 06:45 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa |
| Message-ID | <e36411e6ae43a68978b14954eb7da7d1@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #557951 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in <news:5q99db97824vrk7dtssis084cbahda4lgf@4ax.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: Froups desnecked, Coward. > Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain) > <bender@the.future> wrote: >> FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again: >>> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in >>>> FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again: >>>>> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in >>>>>> FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again: >>>>>>> How is a photon of *lower* energy going to excite a molecule of >>>>>>> *higher* energy, LunkHead? Or to restate the question, why are the >>>>>>> Laws of Thermodynamics *still* kicking your moronic ass? Or to restate >>>>>>> the question, why can't you wrap your puny little brain around the >>>>>>> concept of entropy? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> SPNAK! >>>>>> So a microwave oven, with an operating frequency of 2.45 >>>>>> Ghz, can't possibly warm food that's at room temperature. >>>>> Sure it can, due to the anomalous dipolar nature of water, if water >>>>> wasn't dipolar, >>>> Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive >>>> and 2 negative. No anomaly there. >>> Bwahahahaaa! H2O "is tetrahedral". >>> >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetrahedral_molecular_geometry> > Right there, in YOUR google-groped reference, faketard, it > says i'm right and you are wrong. "It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative." Bahahahahaaa! You'll be getting out your crayons and drawing your kooky water molecule, complete with "4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative", Moron. Notwithstanding your "4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative" blather, which is blatantly wrong, you're further operating from an old, flawed and discredited model of water. Water is icosahedral when considered in bulk (ie: dynamic heterogeneities), but dipolar when considered molecularly. <http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/cluster_evidence.html> <http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/clusters_overview.html#icos> ========================================================== This structuring accommodates explanation of many of the anomalous properties of water including its temperature-density and pressure-viscosity behavior, the radial distribution pattern, the presence of both cyclic pentamers and hexamers, the change in properties on supercooling and the solvation and hydration properties of ions, hydrophobic molecules, carbohydrates and macromolecules. ========================================================== IOW, the icosahedral model of water comes closer to accurately modeling all the anomalous behaviors of water than any other of the dozens of water models, one of which you've chosen... a long discredited model. Oh, you didn't even know you'd chosen a water model to bleat about, did you? Because you had no idea what a water model even was. Because you're a moron. <snicker> > "The most common arrangement of liquid water (H2O) molecules > is tetrahedral..." You fecking idiot. It says "the most common arrangement of liquid water" as in bulk water, as in water clusters, not the individual molecules considered separately, which are dipolar. And it's wrong. Besides which, that page also says "In a tetrahedral _molecular_ geometry, a central _atom_ is located at the center with four substituents that are located at the corners of a tetrahedron." Just how is a water molecule with three atoms going to accomplish that, you idiotic moron? Obviously someone copied-n-pasted without understanding what the fuck they were k'laming... tetrahedrality is on a molecular basis, not on a clustered-molecule basis... fuck sake, if you use that metric, I could say "water" is roughly earth-shaped and sized, with a bottom structure that just so happens to coincide with the exact contours of the ocean floor. You moron. LOL >From my other post: =========================================================== Bwahahaaaaaa! What a fucking moron. Only in the context of non-bonding pair water clusters would it be even remotely considered tetrahedral, and even in that regard you're wrong, as that model of the water molecule has long ago been disproved. So you did a Google search for "anomalous properties of water" because like a good little automaton you did exactly as your Usenet Lord and Master commanded. You came across: <http://www.chem1.com/acad/webtext/states/water.html>, a web page you don't understand... you read "tetrahedral" and immediately ran to Usenet to bleat that big word out in the hopes you'd sound like you're intelligent, and in the process made yourself look like a fucking idiot. Again. LOL In point of fact, had you bothered to read further, you'd have realized that under that old, disproved molecular model water was considered a *distorted* tetrahedral due to the fact that four water molecules form a hydrogen-bonded cluster, with their ideal bond angles at 104.52 degrees. But the 5-point molecular models which led to the belief that water clusters are tetrahedrally arranged have been debunked because they failed to adequately describe hydrogen bonding. To be technically correct, you'd have to say water dynamic heterogeneities are approximately trigonally, nearly planarly, arranged with bond angles at 109.47 degrees, having sp^2-hybridized electron pairs, which combine into icosahedral super-heterogeneities. This model not only fully explains hydrogen bonding, but the electrostatic potential distribution which accounts for the O--O dimer and further accurately models the radial distribution function as embodied in the observed diffraction pattern of liquid water. But the individual water molecule is dipolar, with one strongly electronegative (8+) oxygen and two weakly electronegative (1+) hydrogens, said dipolar nature arising due to the O-H bond angle. And that still doesn't explain your stupidly blathering: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative." Water has *no* "negative poles", and it most certainly doesn't have "4 poles", you witless turd. You'll be getting right on diagramming your fictional "4 pole" water, Moron. SPNAK! =========================================================== > Christ on a moped, you're a dumb git. Says the moron who found a big word and ran to Usenet to try to make himself sound smart, only to find that morons using big words are still morons. LOL > -- > "The 120.208 volt RMS L-N sinewaves peak at 120.208 volts, > moron. LOL" > --fakey claims RMS and peak voltage are identically equal Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames that one can never graph RMS voltage. <http://i145.photobucket.com/albums/r204/Smart_S/PFVAW12.gif> <http://i145.photobucket.com/albums/r204/Smart_S/PFVAW16.gif> <http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms1.gif?81223b> <http://www.pump-zone.com/sites/default/files/Fig-1_34.jpg> <http://www.pump-zone.com/sites/default/files/Fig-2_22.jpg> SPNAK! -- Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know: ===================================== The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*); That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms; That superposition is the same as wave interference; That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves; That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things; That RMS isn't a DC voltage; That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L; That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1; The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave; That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical engineering, physics and control systems engineering; What a positive or negative vector is; That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero; That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic"; That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron. And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph. ===================================== SPNAK! <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-29 07:33 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa |
| Message-ID | <44dd0ba26f5d164aab0c7f9b7b9426b3@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #557608 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.ydj6xs1utm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > nope. even better, he hace proklamed that the best selling anti-cancer > drug is derived from the natural supplement that Dr. Oz told him to take 3 > years ago. Lying faggot. LOL Message-ID: <aa30051e9935408c4b78df6bebe7ff88@dizum.com> ======================================================== Peach pits and apple seeds (amongst others) contain amygdalin. It's only catalyzed into cyanide in the presence of beta-glucosidase, which healthy cells don't make much of. But cancer cells make a ton of it, so the amygdalin gets converted preferentially into cyanide in the cancer cells. That's why Dr. Harold Manner, Ph.D. found that the tumors would get all watery and filled with dead tissue (cancerous tissue) as the tumors went into remission. They were dying faster than the body could remove the dying tissue. In several cases, he forced the cancer into complete remission in a matter of a couple months... plenty of time for Granny Inane to have forced her husband's cancer into remission and allow her to save her husband's life, if she'd gotten off her ass and done the research, rather than waste her time on Usenet. Dr. Manner did, after all, demonstrate multiple times an 89% complete remission rate, with the remaining 11% experiencing significant partial remission. For all intents and purposes, he found the cure for cancer. But go on about your life, don't believe that eating healthily and naturally is good for you... just keep pumping those drugs and chemicals into your system, Chimpy. Especially that strong psychiatric drug Xanax that you have to take *every* *single* *fucking* *day* to maintain your sanity. <snicker> ======================================================== That's Dr. Harold Manner, Professor of Biology and Chairman of the Biology Department of Chicago's Loyola University, who wrote the book "The Death Of Cancer". Message-ID: <libmhm$j68$1@news.mixmin.net> ======================================================== Had she put her efforts toward finding a way to fight her husband's cancer, she would have learned about how amygdalin is contained in certain nuts and fruits, that cancer cells produce thousands of times more beta-glucosidase than healthy cells (which is why cancer cells thrive in a carbohydrate-rich environment... they love the simple sugars). She would have learned about how, when amygdalin encounters beta-glucosidase in the cancer cell, it breaks down into cyanide... which effectively kills the cancer cell. In a normal cell, the amygdalin is not broken down because there is insufficient beta-glucosidase, and it is flushed by the kidneys as waste. She'd have found the paper "Amygdalin Monographic Analysis" that showed excellent pain relieving effects of amygdalin in 65% of patients, that survival time for inoperable lung cancer was more than two-fold, and patients with glioblastoma multiform also experienced increased survival time. She would have found the McNaughton Foundation study proving survival time of laboratory animals with cancer was 70 percent longer than controls. She would have found the Pasteur Institute of Paris studies showing a two-fold increase in life expectancy. She would have found the National Cancer Institute (a branch of the Federal Government's National Institutes of Health, wholly in bed with the drug manufacturers given that they're largely funded by them) study that purported to debunk amygdalin as an anti-cancer treatment... except what they used contained no amygdalin, as Dr. James Cason of the University of California at Berkeley proved. She would have found Dr. Kanematsu Sugiura's research proving that amygdalin prevented metastases. She would have found the study by Dr. Harold Manner Ph.D., using amygdalin, papain, trypsin, chymotrypsin, pancreatin, bromelain, rutosid (pancreatic enzymes) and emulsified Vitamin A... in which 89% of the test subjects experienced complete remission, the remaining 11% experienced significant partial remission. She would have found the Sloan-Kettering study, proving the efficacy of amygdalin. She would have found the book "World Without Cancer" by Griffin, which outlines a complete treatment that results in a significant majority of cancer sufferers experiencing complete remission. But she didn't. She sat her fat, sagging, geriatric ass down, bleated out her retardation on Usenet, and let the drug companies (and the government agencies largely funded by the drug companies. Don't forget that the revolving door between those government agencies and the drug companies just keeps spinning... the cancer industry, it's big business... and big bucks) mislead her for their own profit, as her husband lay there suffering and dying. ======================================================== Oh look, the Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Food Sciences has 25 articles for you morons to read on the topic: http://www.jmbfs.org/?s=amygdalin <http://www.cancerjournal.net/article.asp?issn=0973-1482;year=2014;volume=10;issue=5;spage=3;epage=7;aulast=Song> ======================================================== Kwon et al., confirmed that amygdalin can induce apoptosis in human promyelocytic leukemia (HL-60) cells; [59] Park et al., have shown that amygdalin inhibited the proliferation of human colon cancer SNU-C4 cell, and the mechanism is the inhibition of expression of cell cycle related genes; [9] Chang et al., identified that amygdalin can induce apoptosis in prostate cancer DU145 and LNCaP cells by regulating the expression of Bax and of Bcl-2. [8],[11],[60] Chen, Y. et al., [10] found that amygdalin can inhibit the survival rate of HeLa cells, in a concentration dependent manner. Amygdalin can induce apoptosis of HeLa cells mediated by endogenous mitochondrial pathway. Amygdalin could also inhibit the growth of HeLa cell in nude mice bearing tumors through inducting tumor cell apoptosis. The detection results of human whole genome U133 microarray showed that 573 genes of HeLa cells had differential expression in the amygdalin treated group, compared with the control group, JNK/c-Jun pathway is involved in the process of amygdalin induced apoptosis in HeLa cells. ======================================================== SPNAK! Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Obsessed Retard. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL -- Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey) 5907 Stanton Ave. Pittsburgh, PA (412) 853-6395 (412) 799-0532 (412) 665-8289 (412) 404-8757 DildoRider admits he's stoooopid: MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com> ================================================= >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's >> damaged your brain, DildoRider. > then it appears that you like shooting fish in > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are. Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell. <snicker> ================================================= DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com> ================================================= > so what you're saying is that your targets for attack > have to be really stupid or else you can't manage? ================================================= DildoRider admits much more about himself: MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com> ================================================= "absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly, toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless" ================================================= This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake. 150 IQ? LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-22 06:19 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I |
| Message-ID | <242532c2ec17cc0865013b295c065c92@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #555313 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded LibTard, in <news:nad8i9$ktm$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On 21/02/2016 12:05 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler > Emeritus wrote: >>> Note the lowest curve, conveniently labeled "0°C". > I'm pretty sure I just said "0°C" here. What's with the accented "A", > ko0ky? Are you deliberately misquoting me or did you simply fuck up your > character encoding headers yet again? No idea what you're talking about, LunkHead. It displays fine on my end. Perhaps you should learn how to use a newsreader, then you wouldn't look so stupid. You'd still look stupid, but just a tiny bit less stupid. LOL > Fix0r3d: > > Note that it peaks near 10 microns, falls off steeply to the left of > that indicating not much emission at wavelengths shorter than 5 microns, > but continues more broadly to the right, such that there's a fair amount > emitted in the upper tens of microns. > > Note, indeed, that at the same horizontal position as the peak of the > 200°C curve, the 0°C curve is still at about 30% of the power density > that it has at its peak. > > Your k'lame that snow does not emit at wavelengths corresponding to the > peaks for temperatures above the melting point of water is proved wrong > by the fact that it emits a fair amount at the wavelength that is the > peak of the curve for 200°C. I've got LunkHead repeat-bleating, and I didn't even try. Spankards get butthurt. It happens. LOL >> My gawd, you're fucking stupid. LOL >> How is snow going to emit *anything* after it's melted and run off, > By Thor's mighty hammer, you're fucking stupid. LOL > Why would snow at 0°C "melt and run off"? I didn't say it would at 32 F, you fecking moron. But once it goes above that temperature, what happens? Yeah, it melts. Which means there's no way it can emit at wavelengths shorter than 10.6186 micron. You're the moron who said it was emitting all the way to 5.5 micron, corresponding to 489 F. SPNAK! > You have to warm it up a bit first. Meanwhile, it will radiate (not a > huge amount due to its high albedo, but some) a broad, bell-shaped > distribution of wavelengths, some to the left of that peak though a lot > to the right, up into that dark, night sky, and gradually get *cooler* > on a clear, chill winter's night. Moron k'lames blackbodies can emit to a warmer atmosphere! And he's still k'laming that clouds don't adhere to the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, despite their being... um, you know... *water*. Now you'll have to explain how your magical snow violates the Laws of Thermodynamics, given that you continue to insist that clouds absorb that radiation, thus the snow wouldn't "see" the 2.725K of space. SPNAK! >> Do you not understand the following phrase: "For a body in local >> thermodynamic equilibrium, the amount of thermal energy emitted *must* >> equal the energy absorbed; otherwise the body would heat up or cool >> down over time." > Why are you assuming the snow is in thermodynamic equilibrium? The snow > on the clear winter night is likely cooling, and the Greenland ice under > its cloud cover is warming (and some of it is melting, but it's miles > thick, so it will take a while before the dark earth below it is exposed > -- which will radiate a similar spectrum at the same temperature, by the > way, though more strongly due to its lower albedo). Wrong. Clouds being *water* and water being responsible for the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, clouds over snow, ice or water will have no warming effect. This has all been patiently explained to you before, you've run away from the SPNAK!age you took, and yet you persist in your stupidity. LOL But your admission that snow (and ice, and water) causes a net global *cooling* due to radiation directly out to space is noted... and that's whether there is cloud cover or not. Now take your SPNAK! below with at least a modicum of grace, won't you? LOL >> According to you, snow is constantly getting colder, even if the >> atmosphere above it is warmer than the snow! Because you're the >> lunkheaded anti-science retard. > It's *your* precious IR window that enables that, kOok, Oh, so you're back to admitting that snow emits at the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, and thus cloud cover won't affect temperature over snow, ice or water. Confused much, LunkHead? SPNAK! > as much of the > energy emitted near the peak of the snow's blackbody radiation curve > will go straight up and out to space, if there are no clouds in the way. Wrong. Even if there are clouds it'll happen. You'll be getting right on explaining why snow, ice and water adhere to the ~11-micron atmospheric window, but water vapor and droplets and ice crystals in the atmosphere do not, or admit you're a backpedaling moronic anti-science spankard. LOL > Clouds have tiny water droplets in them, which means a ray up through a > cloud hits millions of air/water interfaces, which refract and reflect > much incident radiation. Clouds thus scatter radiation. You're a moron. And now I'm going to prove once and for all that you're an anti-science nitwit blathering out unsubstantiated bullshit. <http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/wmovl/VRL/Texts/sat28/SAT%2028%20Chapter%2006%20Clouds.doc> ============================================================ However there are many surface conditions when this characterization of clouds is inappropriate, most notably over snow and ice. Additionally, some cloud types such as cirrus, low stratus, and roll cumulus are difficult to detect because of insufficient contrast with the surface radiance. ============================================================ "insufficient contrast with the surface radiance" because those low and mid-altitude clouds do not absorb the infrared radiation off snow and ice. Only high clouds do, and those are generally thin wispy cirrus, cirrostratus and cirrocumulus clouds that aren't thick enough to block much radiation at the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. On top of that, cirrocumulus clouds are relatively uncommon. SPNAK! <http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/wmovl/VRL/Texts/sat28/SAT%2028%20Chapter%2006%20Clouds.doc> ============================================================ As a result of the relative spectral uniformity of surface emittance in the IR, spectral tests within various atmospheric windows (such as those at 8.6, 11, and 12 microns respectively) can be used to detect the presence of a cloud. ============================================================ IOW, they look for the surface emittance *through* *those* *clouds* at the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window as compared to surface emittance at other frequencies to determine whether clouds are present... except over snow or ice, because of "insufficient contrast with the surface radiance" with clouds over snow or ice because those clouds do not absorb the infrared radiation off snow and ice. SPNAK! <http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/wmovl/VRL/Texts/sat28/SAT%2028%20Chapter%2006%20Clouds.doc> ============================================================ The basis of the split window technique for cloud detection lies in the differential water vapor absorption that exists between the window channels (8.6 and 11 micron and 11 and 12 micron). These spectral regions are considered to be part of the atmospheric window, where absorption is relatively weak (see Figure 6.2). Most of the absorption lines are a result of water vapour molecules, with a minimum occurring around 11 microns. This approach has been used operationally for 6 years using 8.6 and 11 micron bandwidths from the NOAA-10 and NOAA-12 and the 11 and 12 micron bandwidths from the NOAA-11, with a coefficient independent of PW (Menzel et al 1993, Wylie et al 1994). ============================================================ IOW, clouds do not absorb at the wavelengths of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. They pass ~96% of the radiation at wavelengths of 10.6168 to ~12.7419 micron, a narrow 2.1251 micron window, which is the *only* band of frequency snow can emit at. <http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/wmovl/VRL/Texts/sat28/SAT%2028%20Chapter%2006%20Clouds.doc> ============================================================ High reflectance measurements result from thick clouds at all levels, and the infrared window brightness temperature provides a good indication of the cloud level. ============================================================ IOW, they measure at a range of wavelengths, then compare that to the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window "brightness" temperature to determine the amount of cloud cover, because *clouds* *do* *not* *absorb* *in* *the* *~11-micron* *atmospheric* *window*, which is where snow and ice emit, thus causing that "insufficient contrast with the surface radiance" over snow and ice. Thus clouds do *not* cause warmer temperatures over snow or ice. Moron. SPNAK! > The effect is stronger at shorter wavelengths, particularly > visible light, but IR will be scattered too, and a lot of it > will be stuck bouncing around underneath and inside the cloud. Your retarded blather has been decimated by scientific fact, LunkHead. Now you'll run away to nurse your poor bootfucked ass. Again. SPNAK! > Clouds at night thus cause a greenhouse > effect, though by day they reflect away much of the incident sunlight, > thus blocking the main source of daytime heating and making for cooler > weather. Wrong. SPNAK! > This is meteorology 101 stuff; it's amazing you still can't seem to > grasp the basics. Then you need to go back and re-take Meteorology 101, because you *had* to have failed it the first time around, LunkHead. SPNAK! >> Now, notwithstanding the blackbody radiation curves, if something >> physically interferes with the ability of snow to emit at a given >> wavelength, then it cannot emit at that wavelength. > And what exactly would do that? Remember, snow at, say, -1°C will emit a > fairly broad range of wavelengths. No, it won't, as I proved. It *cannot* emit at a temperature it cannot attain, and it *will* *not* emit above its melting point, leaving a tiny 2.1251 micron window that snow and ice emit at. Wien's Displacement Law: Displacement_max = b/T Where: T = absolute temperature in Kelvin b = Wien's displacement constant, 2900 um K Given that: 32 F = freezing point of water 32 F = 273.15 K 2900 um K / 273.15 K = 10.6168 micron at the freezing point of water Once snow goes above that temperature, it melts and runs away, exposing the land beneath that snow, therefore snow *cannot* emit above 273.15 K, thus it *cannot* emit shorter wavelengths than 10.6168 micron. Now, let's assume the great majority of the time that temperature will not get below -50 F. That's polar wintertime cold, and likely won't be reached very often anywhere else. 2900 um K / 227.5944 K = 12.7419 micron. Thus, given that snow *cannot* emit at a wavelength that corresponds to a temperature it cannot reach, and given that snow won't reach below -50 F very often in anyplace but the poles in winter, we can safely set the upper wavelength of emission at 12.7419 micron. Thus, snow emits at 10.6168 to ~12.7419 micron, a narrow 2.1251 micron window. This accounts for the great majority of temperatures seen. Outside the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, snow wouldn't even "see" the ~3K of space due to atmospheric absorption at those associated wavelengths, thus snow blackbody emission drops off outside the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, making your blather about "most of it is outside the 11 micron atmospheric window" especially stoooopid. LOL SPNAK! > About the only thing that can > restrict it from emitting blackbody radiation at a given wavelength, > besides its high albedo (which only reduces its overall emission > somewhat), would be a *quantum* restriction of some sort. There are such > restrictions; without them the blackbody curve would not peak at all but > would be a hyperbola with ridiculously high emissions at arbitrarily > short wavelengths. In fact figuring out why this *didn't* happen was one > of the initial motivators for developing the quantum theory back in the > early 20th century. At low frequencies (long wavelengths), emission tends to the Rayleigh-Jeans Law. Conversely, at high frequencies (short wavelengths), emission tends to the Wien Displacement Law, Lunkhead. As wavelength drops, the peak becomes more pointed. Planck's curve breaks down. That's why I used Wien's Displacement Law. >> 2900 um K / 273.15 K = 10.6168 micron at the freezing point of water > That'll be the peak of the distribution. There will be some emissions at > shorter wavelengths, and some at longer wavelengths. But... but... but LunkHead, you were k'laming that snow emitted all the way to 5.5 micron, corresponding to a temperature of 489 F. SPNAK! >> Once snow goes above that temperature, it melts and runs away, >> exposing the land beneath that snow, therefore snow *cannot* emit >> above 273.15 K, thus it *cannot* emit shorter wavelengths than 10.6168 >> micron. > Emitting at the shorter wavelengths does not cause it to heat up!! I didn't say it did, reading comprehension-challenged moron. I said it cannot emit at shorter wavelengths than 10.6168 micron because the snow melts and the water runs off, exposing the underlying soil. You're the moron who said snow was emitting at 5.5 microns, which corresponds to 489 F. SPNAK! > I cannot stress this enough. If you have a perfectly insulated and > reflective box with 0 degree snow in the bottom of it it will emit the > spectrum shown in that curve for 0 degrees and the whole system will > stay in thermodynamic equilibrium since the snow will be receiving the > same radiated spectrum. It will not melt. It will not run away. It will > however emit (and absorb) some energy at wavelengths shorter than > 10.6168 microns, while staying in radiative thermodynamic equilibrium > with its own zero-degree-C reflection. Moron says snow emits at temperatures higher than its temperature. LOL >> Now, let's assume the great majority of the time that temperature will >> not get below -50 F. That's polar wintertime cold, and likely won't be >> reached very often anywhere else. >> >> 2900 um K / 227.5944 K = 12.7419 micron. >> >> Thus, given that snow *cannot* emit at a wavelength that corresponds >> to a temperature it cannot reach, > That's koOky. Zero-degree snow emits (weakly; high albedo) the lowest > curve from that graph. A fair amount of the energy density is in fact at > longer wavelengths than 12.7419 microns. And some is at shorter ones > than 10.6168. It cannot emit at a temperature it cannot attain, LunkHead. The dropoff in emission is greater than exponential. I encourage you to explore the anomalous nature of water in all its phases as regards emission of radiation (the reason for the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window). If it emitted at shorter wavelengths, the satellite measurements of snowpack temperature would be skewed too warm. The Planck curve is an approximation, but it breaks down under certain circumstances. Which is why, at shorter wavelengths, the Planck function behaves in accordance with the Wien Displacement Law. Read the book Atmospheric Radiation, specifically pages 28-31. Also "Temperature Effect of Phase Transition Radiation of Water", Page 9. SPNAK! Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com> ======================================================== ======================================================== > <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800> Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda, apparently. And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole. Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her mouth! Oh, here's Kensi: <http://goo.gl/hdpXFC> She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy? I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice. Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too. <https://goo.gl/sbdRcq> You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls "sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go kinky. LOL > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ> > P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited > any good telescopes lately? Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right? <snicker> ======================================================== ======================================================== I note you've studiously avoided answering which observatories have time standard control capability, LunkHead... only those who actually work at an observatory would even know about such a thing, let alone which observatories have that capability... but then, everyone knows lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy wannabes always out their womanly socks because they're too stoooopid to play the part of the identity they've assumed. Perhaps for your next sock, you should play the part of a mop jockey or a streetwalker... that'd be something you could handle, dude. <snicker> -- Kensi the moron wrote: ================================ The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so the curvature is 4*pi ================================ Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi. Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi Therefore, r = 0.28209479176 Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the units. The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect. Kensi the moron was corrected: ================================ Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you backpedal, LunkHead. You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore = (4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original "The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*? ================================ But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry problems. Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is "science fiction" and "a howler". In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold. He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature, and thus causing gravity to *repel*. Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of magnetic attraction. Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work, and therefore a universe which could not exist. Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation". Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow at 489 F. Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of "blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how spectral absorption and emission works. Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same moron continues to cling to his delusions. Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite. Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's intelligent... and failing badly. That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that struggles (and fails) to understand reality.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-27 01:55 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I |
| Message-ID | <narh9h$6bj$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #555396 |
On 22/02/2016 12:19 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > I've got LunkHead repeat-bleating, Ohhhh the irony! >> By Thor's mighty hammer, you're fucking stupid. LOL >> Why would snow at 0°C "melt and run off"? > > I didn't say it would at 32 F, you fecking moron. But once it goes > above that temperature, what happens? Yeah, it melts. Which means > there's no way it can emit at wavelengths shorter than 10.6186 micron. Don't be ridiculous. Emitting at a wavelength can't make it melt. Emitting cools it down! You're the Lunkhead here, and you demonstrate it every time you post. > You're the moron who said it was emitting all the way to 5.5 micron, > corresponding to 489 F. Of course it is, though the *peak* of the emission curve is at twice that wavelength. > cirrus, cirrostratus and cirrocumulus clouds that aren't thick enough > to block much radiation at the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. And now you finally admit that clouds block radiation in the atmospheric window. Took weeks and a ton of SPNAK!ing you for you to grudgingly cough up that particular admission. > It cannot emit at a temperature it cannot attain Things do not "emit at a temperature", you fucking retard, they emit at a wavelength. The *only* rule linking temperatures to wavelengths links temperatures to particular curves, with particular peaks at particular wavelengths, but nonzero and often substantial emissions well to either side of those peaks. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-26 23:48 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I |
| Message-ID | <MPG.313af4adfd2edce898c94f@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #557150 |
In article <narh9h$6bj$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid says... > > On 22/02/2016 12:19 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > > I've got LunkHead repeat-bleating, > > Ohhhh the irony! > > >> By Thor's mighty hammer, you're fucking stupid. LOL > >> Why would snow at 0°C "melt and run off"? > > > > I didn't say it would at 32 F, you fecking moron. But once it goes > > above that temperature, what happens? Yeah, it melts. Which means > > there's no way it can emit at wavelengths shorter than 10.6186 micron. > > Don't be ridiculous. Emitting at a wavelength can't make it melt. > Emitting cools it down! You're the Lunkhead here, and you demonstrate it > every time you post. > > > You're the moron who said it was emitting all the way to 5.5 micron, > > corresponding to 489 F. > > Of course it is, though the *peak* of the emission curve is at twice > that wavelength. > > > cirrus, cirrostratus and cirrocumulus clouds that aren't thick enough > > to block much radiation at the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. > > And now you finally admit that clouds block radiation in the atmospheric > window. > > Took weeks and a ton of SPNAK!ing you for you to grudgingly cough up > that particular admission. > > > It cannot emit at a temperature it cannot attain > > Things do not "emit at a temperature", you fucking retard, they emit at > a wavelength. The *only* rule linking temperatures to wavelengths links > temperatures to particular curves, with particular peaks at particular > wavelengths, but nonzero and often substantial emissions well to either > side of those peaks. Do either of you brainiacs actually have gainful employment where you apply all this awesome knowledge, or do the two of you just waste your time showing off to each other in a ko0k group on Usenet? If you're both so fucking smart, you should be applying that knowledge more constructively than trying to impress each other here. -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote (Post-Burnore) Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2016 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-27 04:41 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I |
| Message-ID | <narr0u$jso$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #557156 |
On 27/02/2016 2:48 AM, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > Do either of you brainiacs actually have gainful employment where you > apply all this awesome knowledge, or do the two of you just waste your > time showing off to each other in a ko0k group on Usenet? If you're > both so fucking smart, you should be applying that knowledge more > constructively than trying to impress each other here. Aww, ko0ky here is apparently unaware of my ongoing research. Which involves observations of the night sky, hence necessitating a strange schedule. And also involves periods of waiting, during which I've nothing better to do but pull out my tablet and check on my flock of loyal ko0ks. *snicker* One nice thing about these big, drafty academic institutional facilities is that the data-hungry denizens of the faculty have enough clout with the administration to ensure that they all have excellent wifi. Much to the chagrin of kOoks everywhere. *snicker* -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-27 04:10 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I |
| Message-ID | <MPG.313b321ef83ab35a98c952@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #557171 |
In article <narr0u$jso$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid says... > > On 27/02/2016 2:48 AM, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > > > Do either of you brainiacs actually have gainful employment where you > > apply all this awesome knowledge, or do the two of you just waste your > > time showing off to each other in a ko0k group on Usenet? If you're > > both so fucking smart, you should be applying that knowledge more > > constructively than trying to impress each other here. > > Aww, ko0ky here is apparently unaware of my ongoing research. Which > involves observations of the night sky, hence necessitating a strange > schedule. And also involves periods of waiting, during which I've > nothing better to do but pull out my tablet and check on my flock of > loyal ko0ks. > > *snicker* > > One nice thing about these big, drafty academic institutional facilities > is that the data-hungry denizens of the faculty have enough clout with > the administration to ensure that they all have excellent wifi. Much to > the chagrin of kOoks everywhere. > > *snicker* Do you think Fakey actually contributes anything to society with his self-proclaimed impeccable skill set? I rather doubt it. He spends way too much time here massaging his delicate and swollen ego. I don't think he's even employable with his demonstrated lack of people skills. In fact I think he's very uncomfortable even being around people, unless it's through an anonymous Internet connection where he feels safe. -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote (Post-Burnore) Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2016 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-27 07:23 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I |
| Message-ID | <nas4gu$13mj$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #557185 |
On 27/02/2016 7:10 AM, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > Do you think Fakey actually contributes anything to society with his > self-proclaimed impeccable skill set? I rather doubt it. He spends way > too much time here massaging his delicate and swollen ego. I don't > think he's even employable with his demonstrated lack of people skills. > In fact I think he's very uncomfortable even being around people, unless > it's through an anonymous Internet connection where he feels safe. I won't bet against you. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-27 12:57 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I |
| Message-ID | <MPG.313badb45210fc6c98c959@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #557186 |
In article <nas4gu$13mj$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid says... > > On 27/02/2016 7:10 AM, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > > > Do you think Fakey actually contributes anything to society with his > > self-proclaimed impeccable skill set? I rather doubt it. He spends way > > too much time here massaging his delicate and swollen ego. I don't > > think he's even employable with his demonstrated lack of people skills. > > In fact I think he's very uncomfortable even being around people, unless > > it's through an anonymous Internet connection where he feels safe. > > I won't bet against you. That's why you're The Smarter One from the collapsed "Tetrarchy". -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote (Post-Burnore) Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2016 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-27 21:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I |
| Message-ID | <b08e6a1d1b087684fd86b0cba99a0742@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #557185 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Jim "Jism Junkie Gerbil Cannon" Gorman (aka Chimpy the Coin-Slot
Operated SuckMonkey, aka Checkmate The PickleTickler), in
<news:MPG.313b321ef83ab35a98c952@news.altopia.com> did thusly jump
head first into the wood chipper again:
> Do you think Fakey actually contributes anything to society with his
> self-proclaimed impeccable skill set? I rather doubt it. He spends way
> too much time here massaging his delicate and swollen ego. I don't
> think he's even employable with his demonstrated lack of people skills.
> In fact I think he's very uncomfortable even being around people, unless
> it's through an anonymous Internet connection where he feels safe.
Translation:
"BBBBBLLLLLLEEEEEAAAATTTT!"
I note Chimpy's trying for a third "hawt wet 69" (Chimpy's words) with
Paul Derbyshire. Chimpy likes beef tartar smothered in mushrooms.
<snicker>
--
FNVWe:
"The Man Who Spanked Chimpy Checkmate The Cowardly CockSmoker Out Of
AUK, Then Out Of The Flonk, Then Into Insanity, Then Made Him Run Away
Like A Little Spankard Bitch. Again."
In which Checkmate admits to being a faggot and fantasizing about men:
MID: <feb093af883d0bf288e85863264900ed@dizum.com>
MID: <ab050c692202f7d955f7d2876fd39d56@dizum.com>
In which Checkmate says he wants to spank guys all night long:
MID: <k3m5ls$3pr$1@news.mixmin.net>
In which Checkmate confesses his desire to fuck who he claims is a
guy:
MID: <k3oolf$cpe$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k9nj0v$u4a$2@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <l8ogd6$1cd$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lclrtd$eei$4@news.mixmin.net>
In which Checkmate admits he'd definitely fuck a male dog:
MID: <k2h0j1$6ll$5@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k4dsc7$l32$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k5m8o5$vmq$5@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
In which Checkmate admits to having a golden showers fetish:
MID: <k79p80$9ps$3@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k8t9l0$nf0$5@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k8t9kv$nev$5@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k994eg$77l$1@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k9i8is$sna$3@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <lf3noh$sqv$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <76b587bf03232be29596c7a5e11f8eef@dizum.com>
MID: <d1590e1490afb94915166440ceb1190f@dizum.com>
MID: <4c614669bd9da0e2ab54c7a8618864f2@dizum.com>
In which Checkmate asks a guy for a blowjob (again):
MID: <ka4m1r$8rs$2@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <knd50p$7ni$2@news.albasani.net>
MID: <knnmme$3a4$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kp77db$rqk$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kvvjjb$a8t$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kvvjjb$a8u$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l069qt$g3j$9@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l1b6g1$qqv$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l65hh2$jpd$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l9b7ha$ret$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lfe72e$q0s$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lffimp$k2f$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <13de9e018d33aa5c02a89f8acfd8c2f8@dizum.com>
MID: <ddfe5035129d525fb2c441289a7b3c1b@dizum.com>
MID: <8352c247386df60552fec12941ad0c47@dizum.com>
MID: <863c1b2a4221005e6d5252e4b2f955b1@dizum.com>
MID: <9d7e6e672aa61c16813ade0f2815d0bf@dizum.com>
MID: <aacd887c22128680f39ec3ca7f7e1613@dizum.com>
MID: <372519cc110e5acf0d73268cb1a697e9@dizum.com>
MID: <1b8820753ce4e2da87b17874d123f783@dizum.com>
Checkmate's got a thing about tickling guy's asses with random
objects:
MID: <l8rapt$rfm$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lfm4f8$3jb$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <li2ao1$3rf$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <37fb49820eaf36d0a45e91ce73d37d44@dizum.com>
MID: <13badb999438389ea8894228e51614a3@dizum.com>
MID: <2ce704d96dbf41ca89fd9eda221cb83c@dizum.com>
MID: <f9b10e223db85839d004420449391270@dizum.com>
MID: <184091e3de3a10096805606ec6dc5866@dizum.com>
MID: <ee740ba6bc409af0d2b4a66170b4e4d7@dizum.com>
MID: <d1d62217afbcbf98470365178072415a@dizum.com>
MID: <ac96244a69bc75dd3a60e8defda0b966@dizum.com>
MID: <9f02c35ef6d67ac06ee55f90199c3aaa@dizum.com>
MID: <3e4b3a8bb953839b7d2658130dcb927e@dizum.com>
MID: <9ec2ad3439122a906207c9f74c4a3a06@dizum.com>
MID: <761ef52f7fc54d46dd50e2692e160d92@dizum.com>
MID: <8ef71d83a5af476e6e275ea23b984323@dizum.com>
Checkmate's so gay he repeatedly insists that a picture of a vagina is
actually an asshole and balls... he went on and on about assholes and
balls... couldn't shut up about them... come to find out, he was just
trying to tell us that his lost love was actually a man:
MID: <l84jo7$cnd$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l84oip$icu$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l85ste$ao$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l87aud$saf$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l88ptv$nlj$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8dvdt$tj2$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8kl20$91i$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8psgt$m7d$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8rapv$rfm$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l98brg$6hp$6@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <ldg914$pel$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <31e4747ee7179064b1fdd5266cd08d72@dizum.com>
MID: <4dba3edb9556cb8d94bc7b90f3b0c8f0@dizum.com>
Chimpy the neurotic overwrought hysterical hissy-fit ninny escalates
his prescription drug abuse to "calm the fuck down" (Chimpy's words):
MID: <512f192b17a529cc6d490a55c43ac1be@dizum.com> - Oxy, Neurontin
MID: <kjucol$ckr$3@newsfeed.x-privat.org> - Oxy, Vicodin
MID: <kmqoip$cg3$8@news.albasani.net> - Norco
MID: <knc9l2$e66$2@news.albasani.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6lnn79.ppd.17.10@news.alt.net> - Oxycodone, Vicodin
MID: <6lo0dt.b7.17.4@news.alt.net> - Xanax
MID: <krt925$u63$3@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <6o9mv7.7ra.17.1@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6os03j.f3.19.2@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6p12vg.of8.19.2@news.alt.net> - Marijuana
MID: <6pg2lv.v27.17.2@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <kuqmlq$mi7$1@news.mixmin.net> - Amphetamine (!)
MID: <6qprvj.ndm.17.1@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6r26ti.ju0.19.2@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6stbk8.pbh.19.43@news.alt.net> - Ecstasy
MID: <l1b6g2$qr0$2@news.mixmin.net> - Vicodin
MID: <l5kd53$8kd$1@news.mixmin.net> - Norco
MID: <lanvc8$f06$2@news.mixmin.net> - Norco
MID: <larrim$lft$1@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <lcckii$mue$3@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <e7848d7ebc7f0b52e126bc35d82a65cf@dizum.com> - Hydrocodone,
Alprazolam
MID: <MPG.2eb9f496c779fc2998a54c@news.alt.net> - Percocet
Chimpy Checkmate's Famous Faggotisms:
=====================================
Chimpy tries enticing a straight man who lives with a woman to join
him in his lonely faggoty lifestyle:
Message-ID: <b1ae7a665b08a82e652e819482238fbd@dizum.com>
"How about I put the squirrel up your ass to keep your gerbil
company?"
Chimpy's desperate plea to a dude:
MID: <5b690abba10d04da8f7675d278f2c2b8@dizum.com>
"Diddle me!"
MID: <07b50fac74279fabaf78a605899b7934@dizum.com>
"Trojans are a condiment."
Chimpy discusses his new boyfriend, Dave "SnuhWolf" Norris:
MID: <c565ada4723ca2e5cd1259cf8a1d86df@dizum.com>
"Snuhbaby makes a good cock warmer."
MID: <ffd2a514115a20cb3122e71b81907a1f@dizum.com>
"Pack your donut hole, any time, anywhere!"
Chimpy discussing the relative merits of 4 inches versus 10 inches:
MID: <b62ad5949e43f36901836bb59898426a@dizum.com>
"Plus, I suppose it doesn't hurt as much when they stuff it up your
butt."
MID: <MPG.2a5ec5516fc9605298b5ac@news.alt.net>
"Best you keester a kielbasa."
Message-ID: <kvvjjb$a8t$3@news.mixmin.net>
"Brag about it to my dick."
"My dick can't quite hear you, could you come a little closer?"
MID: <knnmmb$3a4$1@news.mixmin.net>
"If you see a dick, suck it."
MID: <6qft9a.g1f.19.1@news.alt.net>
"The Winchester 1892 would make a damned-good dildo."
MID: <l61jjg$tth$1@news.mixmin.net>
"Pump a rump."
MID: <l9d76m$k1v$4@news.mixmin.net>
"You gerbils are always in the dark."
MID: <lal84d$g2u$5@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <97bfaeca4f3abe27b5f6683e319cdb18@dizum.com>
"I gotta gay named Guido from Jersey"
MID: <lamgt8$b2d$1@news.mixmin.net>
"If they're soft, yer probably blowin' it all wrong."
MID: <lchub0$q96$5@news.mixmin.net>
"Hitler would have made a damned good Queen."
MID: <lcsgjb$obk$2@news.mixmin.net>
"Don't get slapped by the cocks you crave."
MID: <b068d280517a2d6c831d4a43f2cc8d31@dizum.com>
To a nearly toothless man:
"I wouldn't pay you to suck my dick if your last tooth fell out."
So Chimpy prefers paying *nearly* toothless men for blowjobs, but not
*fully* toothless men. LOL
MID: <afe97a65ff77e7382ad77cf18ea63e85@dizum.com>
"If I send you some money, will you suck Greg's dick?"
Chimpy likes to watch. LOL
MID: <9d7e6e672aa61c16813ade0f2815d0bf@dizum.com>
"Suck my clit."
Chimpy's proposition to a tranny sucking faggot who gets around being
gay by claiming tranny cocks are 'huge dangling clits'. LOL
Chimpy is confused again: "giant ball-like labia". LOL
MID: <4dba3edb9556cb8d94bc7b90f3b0c8f0@dizum.com>
=====================================
What a FAG!
Melt, Chimpy, melt.
Froth, Chimpy, froth.
Dance, Chimpy, dance!
<snicker>
/\ Properly known as Bill
\ /\ The Monster You Kooks Can't Handle
\ / \ THERE IS NO CABAL - LONG LIVE THE NEW CABAL
\/ The AUK coup is complete. The Old Cabal is no more.
Accept no substitutes...
if it's from Databasix, it's a sure bet it's from a kook.
databasix.com / PacketDerm, LLC / COTSE:
all branches of the same malignant tree.
Message-ID: <l7m8ig$1ld$7@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8jh$1le$8@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8lh$1le$9@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8ne$1ld$8@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8pc$1le$10@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8rb$1ld$9@news.mixmin.net>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-27 19:48 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I |
| Message-ID | <0f5e08594d66b02273e8944da4486ce6@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #557171 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded LibTard, in <news:narr0u$jso$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On 27/02/2016 2:48 AM, Jim "Jism Junkie Gerbil Cannon" Gorman > (aka Chimpy the Coin-Slot Operated SuckMonkey, aka Checkmate > The PickleTickler) wrote: >> Do either of you brainiacs actually have gainful employment where you >> apply all this awesome knowledge, or do the two of you just waste your >> time showing off to each other in a ko0k group on Usenet? If you're >> both so fucking smart, you should be applying that knowledge more >> constructively than trying to impress each other here. > Aww, ko0ky here is apparently unaware of my ongoing research. Which > involves observations of the night sky, hence necessitating a strange > schedule. And also involves periods of waiting, during which I've > nothing better to do but pull out my tablet and check on my flock of > loyal ko0ks. > > *snicker* > > One nice thing about these big, drafty academic institutional facilities > is that the data-hungry denizens of the faculty have enough clout with > the administration to ensure that they all have excellent wifi. Much to > the chagrin of kOoks everywhere. > > *snicker* Oh sure... you're an "astrophysicist"... who can't do simple geometry problems; who doesn't know the difference between constant curvature and Gaussian curvature; who thinks the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent upon that sphere's radius; who thinks the Gaussian curvature of space is predominantly positive thus making gravity *repel*; who has said magnetism had no effect upon the Gaussian curvature of space-time, then backpedaled and k'lamed it caused a slight positive curvature; who didn't know the Riemann curvature tensor concept is the central mathematical tool in the theory of general relativity and the modern theory of gravity; who stated that the curvature of space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation is "science fiction" and "a howler"; and who continues to avoid answering which observatories have time standard control capability, which any astrophysicist would know... and if you knew it, you'd be bleating about it, so you don't know. Yeah, you're an "astrophysicist". Sure. Why can't you address any of the SPNAK!age you received, as outlined in my .sig, Spankard? Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com> ======================================================== ======================================================== > <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800> Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda, apparently. And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole. Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her mouth! Oh, here's Kensi: <http://goo.gl/hdpXFC> She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy? I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice. Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too. <https://goo.gl/sbdRcq> You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls "sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go kinky. LOL > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ> > P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited > any good telescopes lately? Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right? <snicker> ======================================================== ======================================================== I note you've studiously avoided answering which observatories have time standard control capability, LunkHead... only those who actually work at an observatory would even know about such a thing, let alone which observatories have that capability... but then, everyone knows lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy wannabes always out their womanly socks because they're too stoooopid to play the part of the identity they've assumed. Perhaps for your next sock, you should play the part of a mop jockey or a streetwalker... that'd be something you could handle, dude. <snicker> -- Kensi the moron wrote: ================================ The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so the curvature is 4*pi ================================ Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi. Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi Therefore, r = 0.28209479176 Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the units. The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect. Kensi the moron was corrected: ================================ Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you backpedal, LunkHead. You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore = (4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original "The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*? ================================ But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry problems. Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is "science fiction" and "a howler". In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold. He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature, and thus causing gravity to *repel*. Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of magnetic attraction. Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work, and therefore a universe which could not exist. Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation". Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow at 489 F. Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of "blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how spectral absorption and emission works. Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same moron continues to cling to his delusions. Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite. Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's intelligent... and failing badly. That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that struggles (and fails) to understand reality.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 11 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 … 16 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web