Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.checkmate > #55811

Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed.

From "%" <persent@gmail.com>
Newsgroups alt.checkmate, alt.free.newsservers, alt.spankards.fakey, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics
Subject Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed.
Date 2016-02-18 20:06 -0700
Organization Altopia Corp. - Usenet Access - www.altopia.com
Message-ID <962mb6.saq.17.1@news.alt.net> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <op.yc0e3fyitm21m2@benson.localhost> <v01bcbl3fg5g1rg0kpbg2p3a0k9jpapj5l@4ax.com> <a6d0a83f1a82d4a40ed7983305cb4ed4@dizum.com> <ee9ccbdmhbv8ls6rl7lqcqc064ir60iutr@4ax.com> <MPG.313025aed55d604798c7ef@news.altopia.com>

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
> In article <ee9ccbdmhbv8ls6rl7lqcqc064ir60iutr@4ax.com>,
> bender@the.future says...
>
>
>>
>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
>> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>>
>>>>>> Not that that would matter,
>>>>>> as over the periodicity of the vector sum of the Fourier
>>>>>> transformed
>>>>>> phasors, constructive interference would cumulate to 2550.25
>>>>>> volts
>>>
>>>> What kind of addled silliness is this?  Fourier transform
>>>> moves you from the time domain to the frequency domain.  So,
>>>> if you are talking about some behavior in the time domain,
>>>> such as peak value at some particular time, it's quite
>>>> pointless.  The rest of the blather makes no sense to me.
>>>
>>> Vector summation is a means of adding two or more vectors together.
>>
>> Why can't you add anything with it?
>>
>>> Given that a sinusoid is merely the *Fourier* transformation of a
>>> circle,
>>
>> No it's not.  It's a geometric function.  FFS, in a rotating
>> vector, a sinusoid is a TIME-domain function.
>>
>>>  embodying an amplitude and a phase (ie: the angular shift of
>>> the sinusoid, corresponding to a time shift), one can use phasors,
>>> or
>>> complex numbers to denote the phase and amplitude.
>>
>> So?...
>>
>>>   The Fourier
>>> transform "demodulates" the phasor representation of the signal.
>>
>> No it doesn't.  It transforms a function of time into a
>> function of frequency.
>>
>>
>>> x(t) = a * cos(wt + phase)
>>>
>>> Where:
>>> w=frequency
>>> a= amplitude
>>> phase = angle in radians
>>>
>>> The phasor of x(t) is then X = a + jb, thus a = cos(phase) and b =
>>> sin (phase).
>>>
>>> Thus, one can sum vectors:
>>> a1 * cos(w1t + phase1) + a2 * cos(w2t +phase2)
>>>
>>> It's more efficient than computing the Fourier coefficients by
>>> correlation using complex exponentials.
>>
>> You don't compute fourier coefficients by correlation.
>> None of this has anything to do with adding 6 sinusoids, or
>> with anything else for that matter.
>>
>> Can you actually use any of this to solve something?... say,
>> the time when your composite has a value of 2550 v.?
>> Take your time....
>>
>>> Phasor: x(t) = a * cos(wt + phase)
>>> Trigonometric: x(t) = a * cos(phase)*cos(wt) - a *
>>> sin(phase)*sin(wt)
>>
>> You got it wrong again.
>>>
>>>> The poster also demonstrates that s/h/it doesn't know what a
>>>> "differential equation" means.
>>>
>>> I encourage you to educate yourself:
>>> <http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-03sc-differential-equations-fall-2011/unit-i-first-order-differential-equations/sinusoidal-functions/>
>>
>> Another link you don't understand.
>>
>>>> It all sounds a fool trying to sound wise by babbling about
>>>> some nonsense he knows nothing about, and hopes nobody else
>>>> does either.
>>>
>>> Yeah, except everything I've written is true,
>>
>> No, it's all bullshit.
>>
>>>   whereas DildoRider and
>>> LunkHead are off in La-La Land spouting nonsense and using equations
>>> that don't work.
>>
>> No, they were pretty much right.  You are pretty much in the
>> ozone.  You're money ahead to cut your losses and move on,
>> take a spin in the lotus with that hawt wifey.
>
> LOL!  THAT will never happen.  Fakey will spin, deflect, evade, change
> the subject, misconstrue what you said, toss in some red herrings, a
> few
> straw men, and if that doesn't work, he'll faglame you to death... but
> he'll NEVER back down or admit he was wrong.  He hasn't matured enough
> for that yet.  It's doubtful he ever will.

everybody doubtful 

Back to alt.checkmate | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-18 19:02 -0800
  Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 20:06 -0700
    Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-19 05:53 +0000
      Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-19 00:57 -0500

csiph-web