Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #553795 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-17 07:58 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-02-22 18:59 +0100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 309 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-17 07:58 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 10:38 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-17 19:31 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-17 11:55 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 14:04 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-17 12:11 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 07:25 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 01:44 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 09:46 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 07:57 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-18 15:18 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 10:22 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 08:33 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 21:20 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 13:36 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 14:03 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-17 12:11 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 07:20 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-17 11:45 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-17 09:17 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-17 17:23 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 12:35 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-17 19:54 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-17 12:10 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-17 16:19 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-17 13:41 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 16:55 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 06:36 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 18:35 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-18 19:08 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 20:57 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 22:58 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-19 06:32 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-18 23:50 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-19 10:09 -0600
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-19 11:13 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 09:31 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 10:45 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-19 17:58 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 10:12 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 11:19 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-19 19:31 -0600
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 11:14 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-19 13:17 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-19 18:46 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 12:17 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 10:17 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-19 19:24 -0600
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-19 20:29 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-19 19:46 -0600
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 17:48 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-19 20:58 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 21:07 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 20:09 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-20 12:09 -0600
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:59 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 01:38 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 22:52 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 19:06 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 13:24 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 11:30 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-20 10:55 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 12:36 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 22:22 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 23:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 18:19 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-20 16:18 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-21 06:05 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-21 16:00 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 06:09 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-27 01:51 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-26 23:38 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 19:37 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-27 11:48 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 02:14 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-27 23:47 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-28 10:22 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-28 22:57 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-28 07:23 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:08 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 10:23 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 18:54 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-29 02:11 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 11:24 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-28 13:59 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-28 11:16 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 14:26 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-28 11:28 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-28 19:30 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-28 14:57 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-29 03:30 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:28 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 01:51 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 19:03 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 23:00 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 06:13 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:11 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-01 09:55 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:45 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 21:05 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 13:40 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 16:06 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:05 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 11:23 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 14:09 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:13 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 01:36 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 18:19 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 12:35 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 06:24 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 07:50 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 20:28 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 13:39 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 07:15 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 16:16 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 08:21 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 07:40 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-28 13:56 -0500
Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 14:11 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:33 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 01:58 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 17:30 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-29 09:46 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:33 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 18:04 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 08:28 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 19:32 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:50 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 16:10 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 16:29 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIb Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:00 +0100
Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:30 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:13 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 23:45 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 20:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 23:01 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 05:41 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 00:08 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-29 21:33 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 07:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:24 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 12:25 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 12:51 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-01 10:38 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 21:58 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 16:27 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 07:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 01:52 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 18:59 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 20:44 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 13:38 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 16:17 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-01 13:50 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 15:06 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-01 16:08 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 17:13 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 23:37 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:45 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 01:04 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 18:16 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:24 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-02 00:26 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 18:42 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-02 12:32 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-02 11:50 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 06:52 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 07:40 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 08:05 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:26 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-01 09:59 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 19:26 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 13:40 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:55 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-01 16:02 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:12 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 00:48 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:12 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 00:48 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 19:40 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 14:47 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 15:31 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-02 15:45 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-02 12:47 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 16:57 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-02 17:46 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-03-02 21:21 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 22:33 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-03-02 22:54 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 23:48 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 22:31 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-02 20:47 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-02 23:52 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-02 20:57 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-03-03 00:15 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 06:41 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 08:54 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-03 13:17 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-04 03:44 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa liquid <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-03 22:29 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 11:52 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-02 06:30 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-03-01 00:14 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 20:18 +0100
Fakey see's the light. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 13:34 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 05:46 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 08:44 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-03 06:46 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-01 06:45 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part IIa Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:33 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 06:19 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-27 01:55 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-26 23:48 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-27 04:41 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-27 04:10 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-27 07:23 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-27 12:57 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 21:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 19:48 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-27 12:18 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 19:15 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-27 11:41 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 20:48 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-27 13:07 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:00 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 11:22 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-28 11:13 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-28 19:16 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:23 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 14:14 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-28 14:17 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-28 11:26 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-29 12:38 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 07:23 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 01:46 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 17:20 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-29 12:00 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-29 18:19 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-29 10:47 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-29 11:13 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-29 19:41 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-01 04:06 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 02:17 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:58 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 12:13 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-22 05:30 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-21 16:42 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-22 05:47 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-17 20:05 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 22:39 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. mariposas rand mair fheal <mair_fheal@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-17 20:17 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 06:47 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 09:19 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 07:57 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 21:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 15:27 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:37 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 13:28 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 18:39 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 18:44 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 06:20 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-18 17:20 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 02:26 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-18 09:53 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-18 18:14 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 10:19 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-18 15:22 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 08:33 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 06:28 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 11:29 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-18 16:33 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 09:45 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-19 01:18 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 18:45 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-19 03:52 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-18 18:55 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 22:04 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 06:09 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 01:04 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-20 01:00 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:20 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 20:36 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 21:40 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 22:44 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:48 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-19 23:43 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 13:11 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-19 04:32 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 13:41 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 15:41 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-18 19:02 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 20:06 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-19 05:53 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-19 00:57 -0500
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:37 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-21 18:32 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 05:49 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-22 15:04 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-22 07:37 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. mariposas rand mair fheal <mair_fheal@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-22 00:48 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-22 09:20 +0000
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-22 02:29 -0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 09:04 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 18:54 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 11:23 -0700
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-23 02:35 +0800
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 07:10 +0100
Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 18:59 +0100
Page 5 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 16 Next page →
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-29 07:08 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II |
| Message-ID | <e22859cb0da6dd10323e162075835d55@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #557599 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in <news:91h6dbtgnk6b0u2kbo2drg6nreq508r42n@4ax.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: Froups desnecked, Coward. > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in >> <news:8926dbtq5nq96643t33ij034hgul99irrn@4ax.com> did thusly >> jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>> He's a lot like Jerry. He realizes he's wrong, but he >>> doesn't understand enough of the subject to realize how >>> wrong he is. >> Oh, then you'll have no problem refuting those 7 >> peer-reviewed studies I've provided. > The papers you don't understand? You mean the data which proves you wrong, which you cowardly snipped out? LOL > They are correct, alright. > That's why they all agree you're a bleattard. Oh, I understand them perfectly. It's clear that you don't. The following is from my prior post, which you ran away from: ============================================================= <http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/hwrp/chy/chy14/documents/ms/remote_sensing_snow_cover_methods_mapping_snow.pdf> "The emissivity of snow approaches that of a black body at the 10.5—12.5 micron atmospheric window." And *only* at the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. Ever heard of the "radiation paradox"? It's where the net radiation emission *increases* with increasing cloud cover. LOL Check out Holmgren, 1971; Jacobs et al., 1972; Ambach, 1974; Ohmura, 1981; Yamanouchi et al., 1982; Wendler, 1986; and R. Bintanja and M. R. Van Den Broeke, 1996. Then realize you're *wrong* and you've been SPNAK!'d yet again because you're too stoooopid to grasp reality. ============================================================= <http://www.staff.science.uu.nl/~broek112/home.php_files/Publications_MvdB/1996_Bintanja_IJC.pdf> ============================================================= Increasing the cloud optical depth causes a large increase in cloud albedo and only a small change in cloud emissivity so that the cooling effect starts to dominate." Thus, the phenomenon that net radiation increases with increasing cloud amount is, under favourable conditions (e.g. high albedo), attributable to the asymmetry in the dependency of the longwave and shortwave radiative cloud properties on cloud optical thickness. ============================================================= Which is why those high, thin clouds have a weak net warming effect, whereas the low, thick clouds cause net cooling over snow or ice. The lower and the thicker the clouds are, the greater the effect. Moron. Thus, with high reflectivity surfaces such as snow or ice, radiation emission *increases* to space with increasing cloud cover. Cloud cover only causes warmer nights over low reflectivity surfaces such as soil or concrete. Radiation reflected from the clouds is absorbed by the snow and re-radiated in the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, going straight out to space, causing a net *cooling* as cloud cover (ie: optical depth) increases, which is the underlying basis for the Radiation Paradox, which none of you know-nothing nongs knew about. If you morons had any depth of understanding of the physical processes taking place, you'd realize the obvious, but you don't... because you're morons. Your anti-science nitwittery is why you morons believe in the fairy tale of CO2-induced AGW, despite the fact that it violates the Laws of Thermodynamics. SPNAK! > When are you going to show us your derivation of sinewave > summation by fourier transform & euler theorem? Already shown, Moron. Did you miss it? I posted a graphic of the proper Euler sinewave summation equation when I was smacking DildoRider upside his lumpy skull and proving he's a mathematical moron. On top of that, the Euler sinewave summation equation has been in use by scientists and engineers since the 18th century... if you can't find it, you're an even bigger moron that anyone had surmised. And it's become apparent you *can't* find it, given that you've been bleating about my providing it as though I were the only one who knew about it... so your chances of understanding it and using it properly are nil. Because you're Shiny Tinfoil Brain the moron. SPNAK! > At what time to your 6 sines add up to 2550v? As you'll remember, I used the sum total of the six sinewaves' maximum amplitude as a quick acid test to determine whether or not DildoRider's kooky sinewave subtraction equation was correct. It wasn't. It isn't. I also said DildoRider would have to properly graph it to determine the result, since it's a complex periodic sinusoid. He hasn't. He can't. Now, you've defended DildoRider's kooky sinewave subtraction equation, which tells us that by shorting the three phases of 3-phase AC, there is a magical doubling of voltage... you'll be getting right on explaining and mathematically modeling exactly how DildoRider's magical equation is able to violate Kirchhoff's Voltage Law and Watt's Law (not to mention common sense), or you'll admit you're a moron for defending DildoRider's kooky sinewave subtraction equation, and you have no clue how vector *summation* works. SPNAK! -- Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know: ===================================== The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*); That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms; That superposition is the same as wave interference; That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves; That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things; That RMS isn't a DC voltage; That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L; That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1; The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave; That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical engineering, physics and control systems engineering; What a positive or negative vector is; That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero; That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic"; And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph. ===================================== SPNAK! <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-29 10:23 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II |
| Message-ID | <f7a1b53ae3ffda1a931ef6056e23e0ec@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #557599 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.ydj4qdbatm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision( > sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + > (float_precision(20.25) * float_precision( > sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + > (float_precision(1400)* float_precision( > sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)* > float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + > (float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) > + > (float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))); Bwahahahaaa! DildoRider continues using the wrong equation, and expects that his results will magically become correct if he just spams them enough. What's the matter, moron? Can't you figure out that Euler sinewave summation equation that every scientist and engineer's known about since the 1700s? Too stoooopid to understand vector summation, eh? 150 IQ? LOL! SPNAK! -- Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey) 5907 Stanton Ave. Pittsburgh, PA (412) 853-6395 (412) 799-0532 (412) 665-8289 (412) 404-8757 DildoRider admits he's stoooopid: MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com> ================================================= >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's >> damaged your brain, DildoRider. > then it appears that you like shooting fish in > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are. Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell. <snicker> ================================================= DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com> ================================================= > so what you're saying is that your targets for attack > have to be really stupid or else you can't manage? ================================================= DildoRider admits much more about himself: MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com> ================================================= "absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly, toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless" ================================================= This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake. 150 IQ? LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-28 18:54 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II |
| Message-ID | <e8f9479cf998ce47fc37072a5fe291e3@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #557521 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Jim "Jism Junkie Gerbil Cannon" Gorman (aka Chimpy the Coin-Slot
Operated SuckMonkey, aka Checkmate The PickleTickler), in
<news:MPG.313c45dbc7655f4598c96d@news.altopia.com> did thusly jump
head first into the wood chipper again:
> In article <nau6p0$1rc$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Ko0O0oki kensi
> the LunkHeaded LibTard <kkensington01@gmail.invalid>
> dribbles...
>>> IOW, the idiotic anti-science nitwit just k'lamed that
>>> heat can flow from colder to hotter! LOL
>> Who k'lamed that, again? The *net* transfer is in the other direction,
>> because the hot object emits more energy than it receives, and the cold
>> one receives more than it emits. But they do both radiate. Lunkhead.
> Gee, I didn't have any problem understanding that explanation. I wonder
> if the Fakeytard is being deliberately obtuse, or if he actually IS that
> stupid?
OMG! Chimpy also denies the Laws of Thermodynamics. Now Chimpy can get
right on explaining how a photon of *lower* energy can excite a
molecule of *higher* energy.
Now LunkHead can spout Dr. Roy Spencer's nonsensical take on radiative
heat transfer:
<http://www.drroyspencer.com/2010/07/yes-virginia-cooler-objects-can-make-warmer-objects-even-warmer-still/>
....and I can counter with peer reviewed studies by Kirchhoff, Lindzen
and Choi (2009), Joss, Plass (1955), Gehrlich (2009), and even Dr.
Hugh Elsasser's "Heat Transfer by Infrared Radiation in the
Atmosphere", in which are cited 123 peer-reviewed studies proving both
LunkHead _and_ Chimpy *wrong*.
In reality, all Dr. Roy Spencer is saying is that the temperature of a
planet without an atmosphere is cooler than would be one with an
atmosphere... but he attempts to conflate temperature with net energy
transfer in so doing, and fails. Just as LunkHead is attempting to
conflate net energy transfer and temperature. The photons from the
cooler object are not absorbed by the warmer object (and cannot be
since they are of insufficient energy to excite the warmer object
above its already-warmer-than-the-other-object's state), there is not
a two-way flow of *heat*.
IOW, a blackbody can absorb all radiation *above* *the* *energy* *of*
*the* *blackbody* *itself* simply because the lower-energy photons are
not of sufficient energy to cause the blackbody's orbital electrons to
enter a higher orbital. Only a blackbody at 0K would absorb *all*
radiation. Thus photons of a lower energy cannot excite molecules of a
higher energy. Morons.
<http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2015/08/plancks-quantum-theory-explains-why-low.html>
Planck's Quantum Theory Explains Why Low-Energy Photons Cannot Warm a
Warmer Blackbody
Now LunkHead is denying the Pauli Exclusion Principle *and* the very
Planck Curve he's been bleating about! Bwahahahahaa!
Obviously, LunkHead has never read "Principle of Modern Chemistry, 7th
Edition", pages 146-191.
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B74u5vgGLaWoMjk2ZjFBTV9fXzA/view?pref=2&pli=1>
So LunkHead yet again proves he's thoroughly confused, which is likely
why he still believes in the fairy tale of CO2 AGW, despite the NASA
SABER study proving that CO2 causes *cooling*. LunkHead is applying
the Stefan-Boltzmann equation to radiative atmospheric energy transfer
rather than the Gas Law. Or rather, LunkHead is too confused to know
how to model the atmosphere mathematically. Because he's a moron. LOL
In fact, in the comments section of his website in which Spencer
expounds upon backradiation, Spencer agrees that heat always flows
from hot to cold. And that would be because photons of a lower energy
cannot excite molecules of a higher energy. You see, Spencer was
taking the devil's advocate viewpoint to test his readers... later
agreeing that it was "a funny leg pulling exercise". LOL
That's the reason the kooky CO2 AGW k'lame by the libtards breaks the
Second Law of Thermodynamics, as the NASA SABER study proved, and thus
CO2 cannot be a global warming gas. In fact, the NASA SABER study
proved, just as I've been saying all along, that CO2 is a global
*cooling* gas.
Now LunkHead is going to have to explain how radiation from the snow
or ice can be reflected off the clouds, and *cause* *the* *snow* *or*
*ice* *to* *heat* *up*... sounds pretty nonsensical now, eh? The very
energy coming *off* the snow and reflected back to it is somehow
supposed to heat the snow up? Only in LunkHead Land can such perpetual
motion type phenomena exist, especially in light of the ~11-micron
infrared atmospheric window, which means clouds do not reflect the
infrared radiation emitted by snow or ice, as the 7 cited
peer-reviewed studies prove.
Why, according to LunkHead, we could place two mirrors diametrically
opposed to each other, pulse light between them just once, let the
light reflect back and forth until the mirrors were at a thousand
degrees, and harvest that energy to make steam to power a turbine!
IOW, LunkHead k'lames that photons of a lower energy can excite
molecules of a higher energy... which negates large swaths of physics
such as the photoelectric effect and indeed the entire underlying
molecular structure of the universe (think about where photons come
from and why, you nongs).
<http://principia-scientific.org/the-sophistry-of-backradiation/>
<http://claesjohnson.blogspot.com/2011/08/how-to-fool-yourself-with-pyrgeometer.html>
<http://claesjohnson.blogspot.com/search/label/myth%20of%20backradiation>
<http://claesjohnson.blogspot.se/2015/04/unphysical-schwarzschild-vs-physical.html>
Because LunkHead (and Chimpy, who is only defending LunkHead because
he desperately wants a third "hawt wet 69" (Chimpy's words) with Paul
Derbyshire) is an anti-science nitwit who's been proven *wrong* on
nearly everything he's been blathering.
In reality, we've got a process by which the radiation reflected by
clouds is absorbed by snow and ice and re-emits from that snow or ice
at the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window (the *only* wavelengths
it can emit due to snow and ice being a near-blackbody) (just as the
CO2 and NOx do in the NASA SABER study), which allows that radiation a
free pass straight out to space... and this iterative process
continues until, as the NASA SABER study proved with CO2 and NOx, ~95%
of all that radiation is converted to wavelengths corresponding to the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window and is emitted out to space.
Educate yourself, you morons:
<http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/>
=================================================================
"Carbon dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats," explains
James Russell of Hampton University, SABER's principal investigator.
"When the upper atmosphere (or 'thermosphere') heats up, these
molecules try as hard as they can to shed that heat back into space."
For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere
absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO,
the two most efficient _coolants_ in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95%
of that total back into space.
{NOTE: They did this by absorbing then re-emitting that energy at the
wavelength of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window.}
=================================================================
SPNAK!
--
Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================
Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.
Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176
Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.
The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.
Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.
You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================
But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.
Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".
In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.
He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*.
Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.
Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.
Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".
Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.
Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.
Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.
The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.
Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.
Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.
That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-29 02:11 +0800 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II |
| Message-ID | <41e6dbdfi6jkfo9su5frpcvjg4doc7hbsh@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #557594 |
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Jim "Jism Junkie Gerbil Cannon" Gorman (aka Chimpy the Coin-Slot > Operated SuckMonkey, aka Checkmate The PickleTickler), in > <news:MPG.313c45dbc7655f4598c96d@news.altopia.com> did thusly jump > head first into the wood chipper again: > > > In article <nau6p0$1rc$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Ko0O0oki kensi > > the LunkHeaded LibTard <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> > > dribbles... > > >>> IOW, the idiotic anti-science nitwit just k'lamed that > >>> heat can flow from colder to hotter! LOL > > >> Who k'lamed that, again? The *net* transfer is in the other direction, > >> because the hot object emits more energy than it receives, and the cold > >> one receives more than it emits. But they do both radiate. Lunkhead. > > > Gee, I didn't have any problem understanding that explanation. I wonder > > if the Fakeytard is being deliberately obtuse, or if he actually IS that > > stupid? > > OMG! Chimpy also denies the Laws of Thermodynamics. Now Chimpy can get > right on explaining how a photon of *lower* energy can excite a > molecule of *higher* energy. Survey says, he really is that stupid.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-28 11:24 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II |
| Message-ID | <1qe6db1d14tk95g7pb58er4q9fd9dsep4p@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #557597 |
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 02:11:29 +0800, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> wrote: >Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus ><FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >> >> Jim "Jism Junkie Gerbil Cannon" Gorman (aka Chimpy the Coin-Slot >> Operated SuckMonkey, aka Checkmate The PickleTickler), in >> <news:MPG.313c45dbc7655f4598c96d@news.altopia.com> did thusly jump >> head first into the wood chipper again: >> >> > In article <nau6p0$1rc$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Ko0O0oki kensi >> > the LunkHeaded LibTard <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> >> > dribbles... >> >> >>> IOW, the idiotic anti-science nitwit just k'lamed that >> >>> heat can flow from colder to hotter! LOL >> >> >> Who k'lamed that, again? The *net* transfer is in the other direction, >> >> because the hot object emits more energy than it receives, and the cold >> >> one receives more than it emits. But they do both radiate. Lunkhead. >> >> > Gee, I didn't have any problem understanding that explanation. I wonder >> > if the Fakeytard is being deliberately obtuse, or if he actually IS that >> > stupid? >> >> OMG! Chimpy also denies the Laws of Thermodynamics. Now Chimpy can get >> right on explaining how a photon of *lower* energy can excite a >> molecule of *higher* energy. > >Survey says, he really is that stupid. Did you see that 360 he just spun?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-28 13:59 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II |
| Message-ID | <op.ydj4dm1btm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #557597 |
On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 13:11:29 -0500, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
<bender@the.future> wrote:
> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Jim "Jism Junkie Gerbil Cannon" Gorman (aka Chimpy the Coin-Slot
>> Operated SuckMonkey, aka Checkmate The PickleTickler), in
>> <news:MPG.313c45dbc7655f4598c96d@news.altopia.com> did thusly jump
>> head first into the wood chipper again:
>>
>> > In article <nau6p0$1rc$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Ko0O0oki kensi
>> > the LunkHeaded LibTard <kkensington01@gmail.invalid>
>> > dribbles...
>>
>> >>> IOW, the idiotic anti-science nitwit just k'lamed that
>> >>> heat can flow from colder to hotter! LOL
>>
>> >> Who k'lamed that, again? The *net* transfer is in the other
>> direction,
>> >> because the hot object emits more energy than it receives, and the
>> cold
>> >> one receives more than it emits. But they do both radiate. Lunkhead.
>>
>> > Gee, I didn't have any problem understanding that explanation. I
>> wonder
>> > if the Fakeytard is being deliberately obtuse, or if he actually IS
>> that
>> > stupid?
>>
>> OMG! Chimpy also denies the Laws of Thermodynamics. Now Chimpy can get
>> right on explaining how a photon of *lower* energy can excite a
>> molecule of *higher* energy.
>
> Survey says, he really is that stupid.
he's probably got a global warming conspiracy theory that disproves
thermodynamics.
--
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
on page 2:
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
-
snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
compiles with:
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
run with:
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*
Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
That's how stupid you are.
Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-28 11:16 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II |
| Message-ID | <MPG.313ce77b89b4298d98c972@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #557597 |
In article <41e6dbdfi6jkfo9su5frpcvjg4doc7hbsh@4ax.com>, bender@the.future says... > > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > > > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > > > Jim "Jism Junkie Gerbil Cannon" Gorman (aka Chimpy the Coin-Slot > > Operated SuckMonkey, aka Checkmate The PickleTickler), in > > <news:MPG.313c45dbc7655f4598c96d@news.altopia.com> did thusly jump > > head first into the wood chipper again: > > > > > In article <nau6p0$1rc$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Ko0O0oki kensi > > > the LunkHeaded LibTard <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> > > > dribbles... > > > > >>> IOW, the idiotic anti-science nitwit just k'lamed that > > >>> heat can flow from colder to hotter! LOL > > > > >> Who k'lamed that, again? The *net* transfer is in the other direction, > > >> because the hot object emits more energy than it receives, and the cold > > >> one receives more than it emits. But they do both radiate. Lunkhead. > > > > > Gee, I didn't have any problem understanding that explanation. I wonder > > > if the Fakeytard is being deliberately obtuse, or if he actually IS that > > > stupid? > > > > OMG! Chimpy also denies the Laws of Thermodynamics. Now Chimpy can get > > right on explaining how a photon of *lower* energy can excite a > > molecule of *higher* energy. > > Survey says, he really is that stupid. Damn! I thought Paul explained it pretty clearly. Fakeytard has proven that he's unable to grasp even the simplest explanations. What a fucking dolt! -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote (Post-Burnore) Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2016 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-28 14:26 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II |
| Message-ID | <navhkb$ad7$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #557630 |
On 28/02/2016 2:16 PM, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > Damn! I thought Paul Who? -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-28 11:28 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II |
| Message-ID | <MPG.313cea323e3fcab998c975@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #557636 |
In article <navhkb$ad7$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid says... > > On 28/02/2016 2:16 PM, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > > > Damn! I thought Paul > > Who? I'm sorry... I meant "Kensi". -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote (Post-Burnore) Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2016 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-28 19:30 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II |
| Message-ID | <1mjcgoi.wse1j4j5ovi9N%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #557636 |
kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> On 28/02/2016 2:16 PM, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
>
> > Damn! I thought Paul
>
> Who?
^
|
|
[laughs, points]
--
^Ï^. Sn!pe, DoW #2 <snipeco.1@gmail.com>
PTB
Siri Seal of Disavowal #007-007 (license to killfile)
AUK DoW #2, Fuckhead #3
AUK Ministry of Circle Jerks, Aug. 2015 (award now deprecated)
0 %
My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-28 14:57 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II |
| Message-ID | <op.ydj617qftm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #557636 |
On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 14:26:01 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid>
wrote:
> On 28/02/2016 2:16 PM, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
>
>> Damn! I thought Paul
>
> Who?
>
have you looked at fakey's general usenet output in the last few months
post-wise?
you, skeeter, bender, checkmate, percent, and gerg could probably put him
in a padded room without my help.
--
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
on page 2:
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
-
snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
compiles with:
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
run with:
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*
Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
That's how stupid you are.
Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-29 03:30 +0800 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II |
| Message-ID | <iii6db5ekhr7q7rq6ndaaupne5369k392u@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #557630 |
"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: > In article <41e6dbdfi6jkfo9su5frpcvjg4doc7hbsh@4ax.com>, > bender@the.future says... > > > > > > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus > > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > > > > > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > > > > > Jim "Jism Junkie Gerbil Cannon" Gorman (aka Chimpy the Coin-Slot > > > Operated SuckMonkey, aka Checkmate The PickleTickler), in > > > <news:MPG.313c45dbc7655f4598c96d@news.altopia.com> did thusly jump > > > head first into the wood chipper again: > > > > > > > In article <nau6p0$1rc$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Ko0O0oki kensi > > > > the LunkHeaded LibTard <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> > > > > dribbles... > > > > > > >>> IOW, the idiotic anti-science nitwit just k'lamed that > > > >>> heat can flow from colder to hotter! LOL > > > > > > >> Who k'lamed that, again? The *net* transfer is in the other direction, > > > >> because the hot object emits more energy than it receives, and the cold > > > >> one receives more than it emits. But they do both radiate. Lunkhead. > > > > > > > Gee, I didn't have any problem understanding that explanation. I wonder > > > > if the Fakeytard is being deliberately obtuse, or if he actually IS that > > > > stupid? > > > > > > OMG! Chimpy also denies the Laws of Thermodynamics. Now Chimpy can get > > > right on explaining how a photon of *lower* energy can excite a > > > molecule of *higher* energy. > > > > Survey says, he really is that stupid. > > Damn! I thought Paul explained it pretty clearly. Fakeytard has proven > that he's unable to grasp even the simplest explanations. What a > fucking dolt! Paul did explain it clearly, and I was already familiar with enough of it to know fakey was completely full of... itself.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-29 07:28 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II |
| Message-ID | <f59fdf23be91a68b7f29a6516150b296@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #557597 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in <news:41e6dbdfi6jkfo9su5frpcvjg4doc7hbsh@4ax.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> Jim "Jism Junkie Gerbil Cannon" Gorman (aka Chimpy the Coin-Slot >> Operated SuckMonkey, aka Checkmate The PickleTickler), in >> <news:MPG.313c45dbc7655f4598c96d@news.altopia.com> did thusly jump >> head first into the wood chipper again: >>> In article <nau6p0$1rc$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Ko0O0oki kensi >>> the LunkHeaded LibTard <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> >>> dribbles... >>>>> IOW, the idiotic anti-science nitwit just k'lamed that >>>>> heat can flow from colder to hotter! LOL >>>> Who k'lamed that, again? The *net* transfer is in the other direction, >>>> because the hot object emits more energy than it receives, and the cold >>>> one receives more than it emits. But they do both radiate. Lunkhead. >>> Gee, I didn't have any problem understanding that explanation. I wonder >>> if the Fakeytard is being deliberately obtuse, or if he actually IS that >>> stupid? >> OMG! Chimpy also denies the Laws of Thermodynamics. Now Chimpy can get >> right on explaining how a photon of *lower* energy can excite a >> molecule of *higher* energy. > Survey says, he really is that stupid. Or you're a moron. <http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2015/08/plancks-quantum-theory-explains-why-low.html> Planck's Quantum Theory Explains Why Low-Energy Photons Cannot Warm a Warmer Blackbody Do you not understand how atoms work, Moron? Do you not understand that in order for any material to absorb a photon, that photon must be of sufficient energy to increase electron orbital by at least one principal quantum number? Do you not understand Planck's solution of the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, which is the underlying basis for the quantization of energy states? Do you not understand the Pauli Exclusion Principle, which states that a lower-energy photon cannot be absorbed by a higher-energy molecule? Quantum physics on the quantum level and the Second Law of Thermodynamics on the macro level precludes photons of lower energy transferring their energy to molecules which are already at a higher energy... thus a blackbody will absorb all radiation incident upon it that is above the energy which corresponds to the temperature of the blackbody itself. Only a blackbody at absolute zero temperature will absorb *all* incident radiation. Do you not understand that molecules of a blackbody emit photons based upon that blackbody's temperature? How is a photon that corresponds to a lower temperature going to increase temperature of an already-higher-temperature molecule? Read "Principles of Modern Chemistry, 7th Edition", pages 146-148, 215, 224, 230, 254, and 268 to prove yourself *wrong*. That's a freshman college level course book... that you don't know it is proof enough that you lack even the basic knowledge to debate this topic. That LunkHead doesn't know it proves there's no way in hell he's an astrophysicist. SPNAK! <snicker> -- Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know: ===================================== The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*); That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms; That superposition is the same as wave interference; That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves; That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things; That RMS isn't a DC voltage; That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L; That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1; The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave; That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical engineering, physics and control systems engineering; What a positive or negative vector is; That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero; That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic"; And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph. ===================================== SPNAK! <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-29 01:51 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II |
| Message-ID | <nb0pps$ki$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #557782 |
On 29/02/2016 1:28 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in > <news:41e6dbdfi6jkfo9su5frpcvjg4doc7hbsh@4ax.com> did thusly jump head > first into the wood chipper again: > >> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus >> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > >>> Jim "Jism Junkie Gerbil Cannon" Gorman (aka Chimpy the Coin-Slot >>> Operated SuckMonkey, aka Checkmate The PickleTickler), in >>> <news:MPG.313c45dbc7655f4598c96d@news.altopia.com> did thusly jump >>> head first into the wood chipper again: > >>>> In article <nau6p0$1rc$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Ko0O0oki kensi >>>> the LunkHeaded LibTard <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> >>>> dribbles... > >>>>>> IOW, the idiotic anti-science nitwit just k'lamed that >>>>>> heat can flow from colder to hotter! LOL > >>>>> Who k'lamed that, again? The *net* transfer is in the other direction, >>>>> because the hot object emits more energy than it receives, and the cold >>>>> one receives more than it emits. But they do both radiate. Lunkhead. > >>>> Gee, I didn't have any problem understanding that explanation. I wonder >>>> if the Fakeytard is being deliberately obtuse, or if he actually IS that >>>> stupid? > >>> OMG! Chimpy also denies the Laws of Thermodynamics. Now Chimpy can get >>> right on explaining how a photon of *lower* energy can excite a >>> molecule of *higher* energy. > >> Survey says, he really is that stupid. > > Or you're a moron. > > <http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2015/08/plancks-quantum-theory-explains-why-low.html> > Planck's Quantum Theory Explains Why Low-Energy Photons Cannot Warm a > Warmer Blackbody Get back to us when you have a peer reviewed scientific primary source for this k'lame, rather than just some climate-denial kOoksite. > Do you not understand that in order for any material to absorb a > photon, that photon must be of sufficient energy to increase electron > orbital by at least one principal quantum number? Once again ignoring vibrational, torsional, and flying-and-bouncing-around-the-place modes of energy in a warm object or fluid. Because acknowledging the existence of these modes would mean admitting defeat. > Do you not understand the Pauli Exclusion Principle, which states that > a lower-energy photon cannot be absorbed by a higher-energy molecule? Even this is wrong, since one can easily get atomic or molecular electron orbital energy levels spaced thusly: 4 ---- 3 ---- 2 ---- 1 ---- and absorb a higher energy photon to jump from 2 to 3, and then a lower energy one to jump the smaller gap from 3 to 4. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-29 19:03 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II |
| Message-ID | <1c4d78393751d0ab32d7eb9047a7fd11@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #557789 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded LibTard, in <news:nb0pps$ki$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On 29/02/2016 1:28 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler > Emeritus wrote: >> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in >> <news:41e6dbdfi6jkfo9su5frpcvjg4doc7hbsh@4ax.com> did thusly jump head >> first into the wood chipper again: >>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus >>> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >>>> Jim "Jism Junkie Gerbil Cannon" Gorman (aka Chimpy the Coin-Slot >>>> Operated SuckMonkey, aka Checkmate The PickleTickler), in >>>> <news:MPG.313c45dbc7655f4598c96d@news.altopia.com> did thusly jump >>>> head first into the wood chipper again: >>>>> In article <nau6p0$1rc$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Ko0O0oki kensi >>>>> the LunkHeaded LibTard <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> >>>>> dribbles... >>>>>>> IOW, the idiotic anti-science nitwit just k'lamed that >>>>>>> heat can flow from colder to hotter! LOL >>>>>> Who k'lamed that, again? The *net* transfer is in the other direction, >>>>>> because the hot object emits more energy than it receives, and the cold >>>>>> one receives more than it emits. But they do both radiate. Lunkhead. >>>>> Gee, I didn't have any problem understanding that explanation. I wonder >>>>> if the Fakeytard is being deliberately obtuse, or if he actually IS that >>>>> stupid? >>>> OMG! Chimpy also denies the Laws of Thermodynamics. Now Chimpy can get >>>> right on explaining how a photon of *lower* energy can excite a >>>> molecule of *higher* energy. >>> Survey says, he really is that stupid. >> Or you're a moron. >> >> <http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2015/08/plancks-quantum-theory-explains-why-low.html> >> Planck's Quantum Theory Explains Why Low-Energy Photons Cannot Warm a >> Warmer Blackbody > Get back to us when you have a peer reviewed scientific primary source > for this k'lame, rather than just some climate-denial kOoksite. LunkHead denies Planck's theory! Bwahahahahaaa! Look in any quantum mechanics book, you halfwit. Pauli, along with Bohr, formulated the Aufbau Principle to address retardation such as yours. SPNAK! >> Do you not understand that in order for any material to absorb a >> photon, that photon must be of sufficient energy to increase electron >> orbital by at least one principal quantum number? > Once again ignoring vibrational, torsional, and > flying-and-bouncing-around-the-place modes of energy in a warm object or > fluid. Because acknowledging the existence of these modes would mean > admitting defeat. "flying-and-bouncing-around-the-place" LOL! In a solid, you halfwit? LOL I don't deny torsional/rotational and lattice vibrational modes, but the specific mechanism by which any of those modes gives off energy in the form of photons is by causing a distorted electron density. Lattice vibrations in solids cause local oscillations in electron density, thus causing Van der Waals forces to force some electrons randomly into higher orbit, thus emitting a photon when that orbit decays. Moron. You're the moron who's k'laming the heat is "stirring up the molecules" (LunkHead's words) and putting the molecules on a "somewhat different trajectory" (LunkHead's words) so the molecules are "flying-and-bouncing-around-the-place" (LunkHead's words) in a solid because you don't understand that the torsional/rotational and lattice vibrational modes result in a distorted *electron* density, thus causing Van der Waals forces to kick some electrons randomly into higher orbit, thus emitting a photon when that orbit decays, the randomness of that process accounting for the wide spectrum emitted. Moron. >> Do you not understand the Pauli Exclusion Principle, which states that >> a lower-energy photon cannot be absorbed by a higher-energy molecule? > Even this is wrong, since one can easily get atomic or molecular > electron orbital energy levels spaced thusly: > > 4 ---- > 3 ---- > > 2 ---- > 1 ---- > > and absorb a higher energy photon to jump from 2 to 3, and then a lower > energy one to jump the smaller gap from 3 to 4. You fecking moron. If such were the case, it'd be an easy matter to ionize all matter using low energy photons... fortunately for all of us, the universe isn't a moron like you. The electron orbital states are a form of negative potential energy. An ionized electron has potential energy of 0, whereas bound electrons have a lower (negative) potential energy, said potential energy being lower (more negative) with lower orbital states. The formula to determine orbital state energy: En = -hcR_inf (Z^2/n^2) Where R_inf = Rydberg constant Z = atomic number n = principal quantum number h = Planck's constant c = speed of light So what *you're* k'laming is that electrons can attain any orbit at all merely by continually absorbing low-energy photons, which violates Hund's Rule, the Aufbau Principle, the diagonal rule, and the Pauli Exclusion Principle. So yet again LunkHead finds himself 180 degrees out from reality. Because he's not an astrophysicist, he's a lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard. SPNAK! Message-ID: <a76a23be8f4a22ea6c31dde5b3e2dd8c@dizum.com> ======================================================== ======================================================== <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.usenet.kooks/yhNtCQr1rpE/GlDtnrGgMxsJ> <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=145664837800> From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks Subject: Re: A REVIEW: How much does Keith "Murphy" McElroy suck at this Usenet thing? Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 00:58:29 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <km1mfl$t4j$7@dont-email.me> Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="67.70.58.178"; Summary: Murphy is a kook with hundreds, if not thousands, of sock puppets Keywords: Murphy X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118 ======================================================== ======================================================== Nadegda got outed as that lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard Paul Derbyshire by Ray Banana. When LunkHead learned of this, he immediately started backpedaling and k'laming that "Nadegda" was actually just "vacationing" in Pembroke. LOL! Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com> ======================================================== ======================================================== > <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800> Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda, apparently. And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole. Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her mouth! Oh, here's Kensi: <http://goo.gl/hdpXFC> She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy? I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice. Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too. <https://goo.gl/sbdRcq> You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls "sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go kinky. LOL > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ> > P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited > any good telescopes lately? Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right? <snicker> ======================================================== ======================================================== I note you've studiously avoided answering which observatories have time standard control capability, LunkHead... only those who actually work at an observatory would even know about such a thing, let alone which observatories have that capability... but then, everyone knows lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy wannabes always out their womanly socks because they're too stoooopid to play the part of the identity they've assumed. Perhaps for your next sock, you should play the part of a mop jockey or a streetwalker... that'd be something you could handle, dude. <snicker> -- Kensi the moron wrote: ================================ The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so the curvature is 4*pi ================================ Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi. Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi Therefore, r = 0.28209479176 Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the units. The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect. Kensi the moron was corrected: ================================ Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you backpedal, LunkHead. You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore = (4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original "The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*? ================================ But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry problems. Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is "science fiction" and "a howler". In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold. He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature, and thus causing gravity to *repel*. Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of magnetic attraction. Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work, and therefore a universe which could not exist. Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation". Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow at 489 F. Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of "blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how spectral absorption and emission works. Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same moron continues to cling to his delusions. Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite. Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's intelligent... and failing badly. That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that struggles (and fails) to understand reality.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-29 23:00 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II |
| Message-ID | <nb344n$279$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #557921 |
On 29/02/2016 1:03 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >> 4 ---- >> 3 ---- >> >> 2 ---- >> 1 ---- >> >> and absorb a higher energy photon to jump from 2 to 3, and then a lower >> energy one to jump the smaller gap from 3 to 4. > > You fecking moron. If such were the case, it'd be an easy matter to > ionize all matter using low energy ph<SMACKAK00K!> You fecking moron. The wider gaps prevent that. In the diagram above, a lower energy photon might bump an electron up from 1 to 2 but then it gets stuck and can't cross the wider gap to 3, let alone get higher than even that. SPNAK! *snicker* -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-01 06:13 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II |
| Message-ID | <b9a8fe5705e3ff35979fb737e892fb97@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #558184 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded LibTard, in
<news:nb344n$279$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the
wood chipper again:
> On 29/02/2016 1:03 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
> Emeritus wrote:
>>> 4 ----
>>> 3 ----
>>>
>>> 2 ----
>>> 1 ----
>>>
>>> and absorb a higher energy photon to jump from 2 to 3, and then a lower
>>> energy one to jump the smaller gap from 3 to 4.
>> You fecking moron. If such were the case, it'd be an easy matter to
>> ionize all matter using low energy photons... fortunately for all of
>> us, the universe isn't a moron like you.
>>
>> The electron orbital states are a form of negative potential energy.
>> An ionized electron has potential energy of 0, whereas bound electrons
>> have a lower (negative) potential energy, said potential energy being
>> lower (more negative) with lower orbital states.
>>
>> The formula to determine orbital state energy:
>> En = -hcR_inf (Z^2/n^2)
>> Where R_inf = Rydberg constant
>> Z = atomic number
>> n = principal quantum number
>> h = Planck's constant
>> c = speed of light
>>
>> So what *you're* k'laming is that electrons can attain any orbit at
>> all merely by continually absorbing low-energy photons, which violates
>> Hund's Rule, the Aufbau Principle, the diagonal rule, and the Pauli
>> Exclusion Principle.
>>
>> So yet again LunkHead finds himself 180 degrees out from reality.
>> Because he's not an astrophysicist, he's a lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy
>> shroomtard.
>>
>> SPNAK!
> You fecking moron. The wider gaps prevent that.
Bwahahahaaa! Moron k'lames the energy gaps between shells are *wider*
the higher up in shell level one goes! Yet again, LunkHead is 180
degrees out from reality because his puny little brain doesn't have
the horsepower to process reality!
And this bit of retardation is another desperate attempt by LunkHead
to deny quantum physics and k'lame that lower-energy photons can
excite higher-energy molecules. LOL
I guess LunkHead's never heard of electron shielding of the
electronegativity of the nucleus by lower-shell electrons, which is
the reason *why* successively higher shells are spaced more closely
together, thereby requiring less energy to jump between shells.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shielding_effect>
"The shielding effect describes the attraction between an electron and
the nucleus in any atom with more than one electron shell. Shielding
effect can be defined as a reduction in the effective nuclear charge
on the electron cloud, due to a difference in the attraction forces of
the electrons on the nucleus. It is also referred to as the screening
effect or atomic shielding."
Which means LunkHead has no idea what Effective Nuclear Charge is:
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effective_nuclear_charge>
"The effective nuclear charge (often symbolized as Z_{\mathrm{eff}} or
Z^\ast) is the net positive charge experienced by an electron in a
multi-electron atom. The term "effective" is used because the
shielding effect of negatively charged electrons prevents higher
orbital electrons from experiencing the full nuclear charge of the
nucleus due to the repelling effect of inner-layer electrons."
Which means LunkHead has no fucking clue how atoms work. So it's
little wonder the thickwit keeps proving he's a fucking moron who
can't possibly be an astrophysicist.
SPNAK!
> In the diagram above, a
> lower energy photon might bump an electron up from 1 to 2 but then it
> gets stuck and can't cross the wider gap to 3, let alone get higher than
> even that.
You just keep on spewing retarded unsubstantiated shit and proving
you're an idiotic mouthbreathing moron, LunkHead... how much more
SPNAK!age can you take before even *you* have to admit you're the
biggest spankard on Usenet? LOL
> SP<SMACKAKOOK!>
Moron.
Message-ID: <a76a23be8f4a22ea6c31dde5b3e2dd8c@dizum.com>
========================================================
========================================================
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.usenet.kooks/yhNtCQr1rpE/GlDtnrGgMxsJ>
<http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=145664837800>
From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks
Subject: Re: A REVIEW: How much does Keith "Murphy" McElroy suck at
this Usenet thing?
Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 00:58:29 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <km1mfl$t4j$7@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org;
posting-host="67.70.58.178";
Summary: Murphy is a kook with hundreds, if not thousands, of sock
puppets
Keywords: Murphy
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
========================================================
========================================================
Nadegda got outed as that lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard Paul
Derbyshire by Ray Banana. When LunkHead learned of this, he
immediately started backpedaling and k'laming that "Nadegda" was
actually just "vacationing" in Pembroke. LOL!
Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com>
========================================================
========================================================
> <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800>
Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by
coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda,
apparently.
And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team
on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole.
Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch
anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to
it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared
between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his
f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in
getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her
mouth!
Oh, here's Kensi:
<http://goo.gl/hdpXFC>
She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy?
I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice.
Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right
thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too.
<https://goo.gl/sbdRcq>
You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to
say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls
"sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go
kinky. LOL
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ>
> P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited
> any good telescopes lately?
Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control
capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right?
<snicker>
========================================================
========================================================
I note you've studiously avoided answering which observatories have
time standard control capability, LunkHead... only those who actually
work at an observatory would even know about such a thing, let alone
which observatories have that capability... but then, everyone knows
lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy wannabes always out their womanly socks
because they're too stoooopid to play the part of the identity they've
assumed. Perhaps for your next sock, you should play the part of a mop
jockey or a streetwalker... that'd be something you could handle,
dude.
<snicker>
--
Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================
Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.
Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176
Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.
The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.
Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.
You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================
But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.
Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".
In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.
He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*.
Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.
Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.
Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".
Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.
Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.
Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.
The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.
Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.
Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.
That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-01 11:11 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II |
| Message-ID | <nb4f03$dor$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #558205 |
On 01/03/2016 12:13 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded LibTard, in > <news:nb344n$279$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the > wood chipper again: > >> On 29/02/2016 1:03 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler >> Emeritus wrote: > >>>> 4 ---- >>>> 3 ---- >>>> >>>> 2 ---- >>>> 1 ---- >>>> >>>> and absorb a higher energy photon to jump from 2 to 3, and then a lower >>>> energy one to jump the smaller gap from 3 to 4. > >>> You fecking moron. If such were the case, it'd be an easy matter to >>> ionize all matter using low energy ph<SMACKAK00K!> >> >> You fecking moron. The wider gaps prevent that. > > Bwahahahaaa! Moron k'lames the energy gaps between shells are *wider* > the higher up in shell level one goes! Yet again, Lu<SMACKAK00K!> http://chemsite.lsrhs.net/bonding/images/orbital_energy_diag_large.gif Note that sometimes wider gaps are above narrower gaps, as is the case with the 4p to 5s gap above the 3d to 4p gap. Note that the bottom four energy levels are spaced quite similarly to my own crude ASCII diagram, with a narrower gap to either side of a wider one. Note that you have been proved wrong for the umpteenth time already about electron energy levels *and* about water molecules -- I guess chemistry just isn't your subject, any more than climatology, meteorology, general relativity, HTTP, HTML, Javascript, thermodynamics, electrical engineering, trigonometry, Fourier analysis, politics, or any of the other things you've recently given a whirl are. SPNAK! Maybe you'll get lucky with your *next* choice of educated topic. Maybe. But if I were a betting woman I'd put my money on your losing streak continuing instead. *snicker* -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-01 09:55 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II |
| Message-ID | <MPG.313f775e3a65c9b598c9c3@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #558298 |
In article <nb4f03$dor$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid says... > > On 01/03/2016 12:13 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > > > Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded LibTard, in > > <news:nb344n$279$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the > > wood chipper again: > > > >> On 29/02/2016 1:03 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler > >> Emeritus wrote: > > > >>>> 4 ---- > >>>> 3 ---- > >>>> > >>>> 2 ---- > >>>> 1 ---- > >>>> > >>>> and absorb a higher energy photon to jump from 2 to 3, and then a lower > >>>> energy one to jump the smaller gap from 3 to 4. > > > >>> You fecking moron. If such were the case, it'd be an easy matter to > >>> ionize all matter using low energy ph<SMACKAK00K!> > >> > >> You fecking moron. The wider gaps prevent that. > > > > Bwahahahaaa! Moron k'lames the energy gaps between shells are *wider* > > the higher up in shell level one goes! Yet again, Lu<SMACKAK00K!> > > http://chemsite.lsrhs.net/bonding/images/orbital_energy_diag_large.gif > > Note that sometimes wider gaps are above narrower gaps, as is the case > with the 4p to 5s gap above the 3d to 4p gap. > > Note that the bottom four energy levels are spaced quite similarly to my > own crude ASCII diagram, with a narrower gap to either side of a wider one. > > Note that you have been proved wrong for the umpteenth time already > about electron energy levels *and* about water molecules -- I guess > chemistry just isn't your subject, any more than climatology, > meteorology, general relativity, HTTP, HTML, Javascript, thermodynamics, > electrical engineering, trigonometry, Fourier analysis, politics, or any > of the other things you've recently given a whirl are. > > SPNAK! > > Maybe you'll get lucky with your *next* choice of educated topic. > > Maybe. > > But if I were a betting woman I'd put my money on your losing streak > continuing instead. > > *snicker* I think a song might be appropriate at this juncture... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4GLAKEjU4w -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote (Post-Burnore) Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2016 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 06:45 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed. Part II |
| Message-ID | <9f9f0c66af83a6fdfebb0b5c09d5bc10@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #558328 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Jim "Jism Junkie Gerbil Cannon" Gorman (aka Chimpy the Coin-Slot
Operated SuckMonkey, aka Checkmate The PickleTickler), in
<news:MPG.313f775e3a65c9b598c9c3@news.altopia.com> did thusly jump
head first into the wood chipper again:
> In article <nb4f03$dor$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Ko0O0oki kensi
> the LunkHeaded LibTard <kkensington01@gmail.invalid>
> says...
>> <SMACKAKOOK!>
You've been proven wrong. Moron.
You k'lamed that the energy gaps between shells are wider with
successively higher electron orbitals, because you had no clue about
electron shielding of the electronegativity of the nucleus. You were
proven to be 180 degrees out from reality. Again.
You k'lamed the above so you could k'lame that lower-energy photons
could excite higher-energy atoms. You were proven to be 180 degrees
out from reality. Again.
In fact, you even contradicted yourself with those two statements,
although I'm sure you're far too retarded to understand why... but you
thereby self-SPNAK!'d and proved you're 180 degrees out from reality.
Again.
Moron. LOL
You cannot deny quantum physics, all you can do is continue to blather
out your stupidity, thereby proving there's no fucking way you're an
astrophysicist... you're just a lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard.
SPNAK!
> I think a song might be appropriate at this juncture...
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4GLAKEjU4w
The most blatant begging for another "hawt wet 69" (Chimpy's words)
with Paul Derbyshire that Chimpy's ever done.
<snicker>
Message-ID: <a76a23be8f4a22ea6c31dde5b3e2dd8c@dizum.com>
========================================================
========================================================
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.usenet.kooks/yhNtCQr1rpE/GlDtnrGgMxsJ>
<http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=145664837800>
From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks
Subject: Re: A REVIEW: How much does Keith "Murphy" McElroy suck at
this Usenet thing?
Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 00:58:29 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <km1mfl$t4j$7@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org;
posting-host="67.70.58.178";
Summary: Murphy is a kook with hundreds, if not thousands, of sock
puppets
Keywords: Murphy
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
========================================================
========================================================
Nadegda got outed as that lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard Paul
Derbyshire by Ray Banana. When LunkHead learned of this, he
immediately started backpedaling and k'laming that "Nadegda" was
actually just "vacationing" in Pembroke. LOL!
Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com>
========================================================
========================================================
> <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800>
Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by
coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda,
apparently.
And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team
on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole.
Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch
anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to
it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared
between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his
f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in
getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her
mouth!
Oh, here's Kensi:
<http://goo.gl/hdpXFC>
She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy?
I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice.
Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right
thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too.
<https://goo.gl/sbdRcq>
You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to
say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls
"sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go
kinky. LOL
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ>
> P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited
> any good telescopes lately?
Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control
capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right?
<snicker>
========================================================
========================================================
I note you've studiously avoided answering which observatories have
time standard control capability, LunkHead... only those who actually
work at an observatory would even know about such a thing, let alone
which observatories have that capability... but then, everyone knows
lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy wannabes always out their womanly socks
because they're too stoooopid to play the part of the identity they've
assumed. Perhaps for your next sock, you should play the part of a mop
jockey or a streetwalker... that'd be something you could handle,
dude.
<snicker>
--
FNVWe:
"The Man Who Spanked Chimpy Checkmate The Cowardly CockSmoker Out Of
AUK, Then Out Of The Flonk, Then Into Insanity, Then Made Him Run Away
Like A Little Spankard Bitch. Again."
In which Checkmate admits to being a faggot and fantasizing about men:
MID: <feb093af883d0bf288e85863264900ed@dizum.com>
MID: <ab050c692202f7d955f7d2876fd39d56@dizum.com>
In which Checkmate says he wants to spank guys all night long:
MID: <k3m5ls$3pr$1@news.mixmin.net>
In which Checkmate confesses his desire to fuck who he claims is a
guy:
MID: <k3oolf$cpe$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k9nj0v$u4a$2@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <l8ogd6$1cd$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lclrtd$eei$4@news.mixmin.net>
In which Checkmate admits he'd definitely fuck a male dog:
MID: <k2h0j1$6ll$5@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k4dsc7$l32$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k5m8o5$vmq$5@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
In which Checkmate admits to having a golden showers fetish:
MID: <k79p80$9ps$3@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k8t9l0$nf0$5@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k8t9kv$nev$5@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k994eg$77l$1@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k9i8is$sna$3@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <lf3noh$sqv$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <76b587bf03232be29596c7a5e11f8eef@dizum.com>
MID: <d1590e1490afb94915166440ceb1190f@dizum.com>
MID: <4c614669bd9da0e2ab54c7a8618864f2@dizum.com>
In which Checkmate asks a guy for a blowjob (again):
MID: <ka4m1r$8rs$2@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <knd50p$7ni$2@news.albasani.net>
MID: <knnmme$3a4$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kp77db$rqk$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kvvjjb$a8t$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kvvjjb$a8u$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l069qt$g3j$9@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l1b6g1$qqv$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l65hh2$jpd$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l9b7ha$ret$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lfe72e$q0s$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lffimp$k2f$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <13de9e018d33aa5c02a89f8acfd8c2f8@dizum.com>
MID: <ddfe5035129d525fb2c441289a7b3c1b@dizum.com>
MID: <8352c247386df60552fec12941ad0c47@dizum.com>
MID: <863c1b2a4221005e6d5252e4b2f955b1@dizum.com>
MID: <9d7e6e672aa61c16813ade0f2815d0bf@dizum.com>
MID: <aacd887c22128680f39ec3ca7f7e1613@dizum.com>
MID: <372519cc110e5acf0d73268cb1a697e9@dizum.com>
MID: <1b8820753ce4e2da87b17874d123f783@dizum.com>
Checkmate's got a thing about tickling guy's asses with random
objects:
MID: <l8rapt$rfm$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lfm4f8$3jb$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <li2ao1$3rf$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <37fb49820eaf36d0a45e91ce73d37d44@dizum.com>
MID: <13badb999438389ea8894228e51614a3@dizum.com>
MID: <2ce704d96dbf41ca89fd9eda221cb83c@dizum.com>
MID: <f9b10e223db85839d004420449391270@dizum.com>
MID: <184091e3de3a10096805606ec6dc5866@dizum.com>
MID: <ee740ba6bc409af0d2b4a66170b4e4d7@dizum.com>
MID: <d1d62217afbcbf98470365178072415a@dizum.com>
MID: <ac96244a69bc75dd3a60e8defda0b966@dizum.com>
MID: <9f02c35ef6d67ac06ee55f90199c3aaa@dizum.com>
MID: <3e4b3a8bb953839b7d2658130dcb927e@dizum.com>
MID: <9ec2ad3439122a906207c9f74c4a3a06@dizum.com>
MID: <761ef52f7fc54d46dd50e2692e160d92@dizum.com>
MID: <8ef71d83a5af476e6e275ea23b984323@dizum.com>
Checkmate's so gay he repeatedly insists that a picture of a vagina is
actually an asshole and balls... he went on and on about assholes and
balls... couldn't shut up about them... come to find out, he was just
trying to tell us that his lost love was actually a man:
MID: <l84jo7$cnd$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l84oip$icu$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l85ste$ao$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l87aud$saf$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l88ptv$nlj$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8dvdt$tj2$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8kl20$91i$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8psgt$m7d$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8rapv$rfm$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l98brg$6hp$6@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <ldg914$pel$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <31e4747ee7179064b1fdd5266cd08d72@dizum.com>
MID: <4dba3edb9556cb8d94bc7b90f3b0c8f0@dizum.com>
Chimpy the neurotic overwrought hysterical hissy-fit ninny escalates
his prescription drug abuse to "calm the fuck down" (Chimpy's words):
MID: <512f192b17a529cc6d490a55c43ac1be@dizum.com> - Oxy, Neurontin
MID: <kjucol$ckr$3@newsfeed.x-privat.org> - Oxy, Vicodin
MID: <kmqoip$cg3$8@news.albasani.net> - Norco
MID: <knc9l2$e66$2@news.albasani.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6lnn79.ppd.17.10@news.alt.net> - Oxycodone, Vicodin
MID: <6lo0dt.b7.17.4@news.alt.net> - Xanax
MID: <krt925$u63$3@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <6o9mv7.7ra.17.1@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6os03j.f3.19.2@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6p12vg.of8.19.2@news.alt.net> - Marijuana
MID: <6pg2lv.v27.17.2@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <kuqmlq$mi7$1@news.mixmin.net> - Amphetamine (!)
MID: <6qprvj.ndm.17.1@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6r26ti.ju0.19.2@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6stbk8.pbh.19.43@news.alt.net> - Ecstasy
MID: <l1b6g2$qr0$2@news.mixmin.net> - Vicodin
MID: <l5kd53$8kd$1@news.mixmin.net> - Norco
MID: <lanvc8$f06$2@news.mixmin.net> - Norco
MID: <larrim$lft$1@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <lcckii$mue$3@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <e7848d7ebc7f0b52e126bc35d82a65cf@dizum.com> - Hydrocodone,
Alprazolam
MID: <MPG.2eb9f496c779fc2998a54c@news.alt.net> - Percocet
Chimpy Checkmate's Famous Faggotisms:
=====================================
Chimpy tries enticing a straight man who lives with a woman to join
him in his lonely faggoty lifestyle:
Message-ID: <b1ae7a665b08a82e652e819482238fbd@dizum.com>
"How about I put the squirrel up your ass to keep your gerbil
company?"
Chimpy's desperate plea to a dude:
MID: <5b690abba10d04da8f7675d278f2c2b8@dizum.com>
"Diddle me!"
MID: <07b50fac74279fabaf78a605899b7934@dizum.com>
"Trojans are a condiment."
Chimpy discusses his new boyfriend, Dave "SnuhWolf" Norris:
MID: <c565ada4723ca2e5cd1259cf8a1d86df@dizum.com>
"Snuhbaby makes a good cock warmer."
MID: <ffd2a514115a20cb3122e71b81907a1f@dizum.com>
"Pack your donut hole, any time, anywhere!"
Chimpy discussing the relative merits of 4 inches versus 10 inches:
MID: <b62ad5949e43f36901836bb59898426a@dizum.com>
"Plus, I suppose it doesn't hurt as much when they stuff it up your
butt."
MID: <MPG.2a5ec5516fc9605298b5ac@news.alt.net>
"Best you keester a kielbasa."
Message-ID: <kvvjjb$a8t$3@news.mixmin.net>
"Brag about it to my dick."
"My dick can't quite hear you, could you come a little closer?"
MID: <knnmmb$3a4$1@news.mixmin.net>
"If you see a dick, suck it."
MID: <6qft9a.g1f.19.1@news.alt.net>
"The Winchester 1892 would make a damned-good dildo."
MID: <l61jjg$tth$1@news.mixmin.net>
"Pump a rump."
MID: <l9d76m$k1v$4@news.mixmin.net>
"You gerbils are always in the dark."
MID: <lal84d$g2u$5@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <97bfaeca4f3abe27b5f6683e319cdb18@dizum.com>
"I gotta gay named Guido from Jersey"
MID: <lamgt8$b2d$1@news.mixmin.net>
"If they're soft, yer probably blowin' it all wrong."
MID: <lchub0$q96$5@news.mixmin.net>
"Hitler would have made a damned good Queen."
MID: <lcsgjb$obk$2@news.mixmin.net>
"Don't get slapped by the cocks you crave."
MID: <b068d280517a2d6c831d4a43f2cc8d31@dizum.com>
To a nearly toothless man:
"I wouldn't pay you to suck my dick if your last tooth fell out."
So Chimpy prefers paying *nearly* toothless men for blowjobs, but not
*fully* toothless men. LOL
MID: <afe97a65ff77e7382ad77cf18ea63e85@dizum.com>
"If I send you some money, will you suck Greg's dick?"
Chimpy likes to watch. LOL
MID: <9d7e6e672aa61c16813ade0f2815d0bf@dizum.com>
"Suck my clit."
Chimpy's proposition to a tranny sucking faggot who gets around being
gay by claiming tranny cocks are 'huge dangling clits'. LOL
Chimpy is confused again: "giant ball-like labia". LOL
MID: <4dba3edb9556cb8d94bc7b90f3b0c8f0@dizum.com>
=====================================
What a FAG!
Melt, Chimpy, melt.
Froth, Chimpy, froth.
Dance, Chimpy, dance!
<snicker>
/\ Properly known as Bill
\ /\ The Monster You Kooks Can't Handle
\ / \ THERE IS NO CABAL - LONG LIVE THE NEW CABAL
\/ The AUK coup is complete. The Old Cabal is no more.
Accept no substitutes...
if it's from Databasix, it's a sure bet it's from a kook.
databasix.com / PacketDerm, LLC / COTSE:
all branches of the same malignant tree.
Message-ID: <l7m8ig$1ld$7@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8jh$1le$8@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8lh$1le$9@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8ne$1ld$8@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8pc$1le$10@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8rb$1ld$9@news.mixmin.net>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 16 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web