Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #554189 > unrolled thread

Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 10:25 +0100
    Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 06:26 -0700
      Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 10:17 -0500
        Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 08:33 -0700
          Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 11:14 -0500
            Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 09:43 -0700
              Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-18 13:11 -0800
                Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 16:13 -0500
                Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 14:20 -0700
    Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 19:19 -0500
      Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 19:27 -0500
        Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 21:22 -0500
          Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 22:47 -0500
            Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 22:56 -0500
            Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 06:30 +0100
        Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 07:30 +0100
      Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:42 +0100
        Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 01:45 -0500
          Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 23:04 -0800
            Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 02:17 -0500
            Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-20 08:04 +0000
          Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 18:15 +0100
            Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 10:27 -0700
            Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-21 19:02 +0800
              Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 07:15 +0100
                Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-22 15:32 +0800
                  Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 19:05 +0100
                    Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 11:27 -0700
                      Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-23 02:45 +0800
                        Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 12:00 -0700
                          Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-23 03:16 +0800
                            Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-22 19:28 +0000
                            Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 12:41 -0700
                              Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-22 20:07 +0000
          Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-20 15:29 -0500
            Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 16:21 -0500
            Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-20 22:09 +0000
              Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-20 16:14 -0800
                Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-21 12:07 +0800

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#554189 — Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka 
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), 
socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
<news:op.yczs57j1tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
into the wood chipper again:

> https://mathblag.wordpress.com/2013/09/01/sums-of-periodic-functions/
> Sums of periodic functions are not always periodic
> 
> If the periods of two periodic functions do not have a common multiple,  
> then their sum is not periodic. Perhaps the simplest example is \sin(x) +  
> \sin(\pi x), whose terms have least periods 2p and 2 respectively.

And that has what, exactly to do with the _periodicity_ of those
sinewaves of _periodicity_ 4,444,525,800? Are you demonstrating yet
again that you have no fucking clue what the difference is between
periodic and aperiodic, which means you yet again reiterate your utter
inability to grok Euler's formula? LOL

Educate yourself, you moron:
<http://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-understanding-of-eulers-formula/>
<http://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-understanding-of-sine-waves/>

SPNAK!

> our usenet lord fakey has bestowed us with sine waves described by the  
> following equations:
> 
> 150*sin(120*2*pi*x)
> 20.25*sin(33*2*pi*x)
> 1400*sin(150*2*pi*x)
> 20*sin(5013*2*pi*x)
> 600*sin(13*2*pi*x)
> 360*sin(1209*2*pi*x)
> 
> http://www.calculatorsoup.com/calculators/math/lcm.php
> 
> Find the LCM of:
> (numbers separated by commas)
> 
> 5013, 1209, 150, 120, 33, 13
> 
> Answer:
> For the values: 5013, 1209, 150, 120, 33, 13
> The LCM is: 4444525800

Which you only figured out *after* LunkHead posted the same thing,
giving you the first faint glimmer of kloo that all those sinewaves
would constructively interfere to reach 2550.25 volts at a periodicity
of 4444525800. Coincidentally giving you the first faint glimmer of
kloo that your kooky sinewave subtraction equation was *wrong* because
it never reached that result, as you proved and even went to the
trouble of *graphing* for us. Because spankards often go to great
lengths to ensure they're well and truly SPNAK!'d.

SPNAK!

> so fakey, at what value of x (in seconds) is the value of the sum of those  
> equations equal to 2550.25?

Already answered, you writhing backpedaling moronic halfwit. In fact,
you just answered it. Except even simple math confuses you, so you
don't realize you just answered it.

Go on, puzzle it out, DildoRider. The six sinewaves are quantified as
Hz, which is cycles per second. The periodicity is therefore
quantified as *what*? You can do it, DildoRider, just put the crack
pipe down for 5 minutes to gain an IQ or two.

SPNAK!

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Mathematical Moron. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

-- 

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 853-6395
(412) 799-0532
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
=================================================
>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.

> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

<snicker>
=================================================

DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com>
=================================================
> so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
> have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================

DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================

This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.

150 IQ? LOL

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#554201

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:25:45 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> so fakey, at what value of x (in seconds) is the value of the sum of those  
>> equations equal to 2550.25?
>
>Already answered,

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554231

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:26:44 -0500, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote:

> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:25:45 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>> so fakey, at what value of x (in seconds) is the value of the sum of  
>>> those
>>> equations equal to 2550.25?
>>
>> Already answered,

MID?

-- 
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:  
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>  phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>  voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking  
*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to  
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract  
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each  
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
  opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
  of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

-

On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL


on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist.  hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

-

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554243

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:17:58 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder
living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey),
socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117"
<root@127.0.0.1> wrote:

>On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:26:44 -0500, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:25:45 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>>
>>>> so fakey, at what value of x (in seconds) is the value of the sum of  
>>>> those
>>>> equations equal to 2550.25?
>>>
>>> Already answered,
>
>MID?


Are you to dumb to use google and find it?

:-)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554259

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:33:09 -0500, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote:

> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:17:58 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder
> living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey),
> socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117"
> <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:26:44 -0500, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>  
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:25:45 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
>>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> so fakey, at what value of x (in seconds) is the value of the sum of
>>>>> those
>>>>> equations equal to 2550.25?
>>>>
>>>> Already answered,
>>
>> MID?
>
>
> Are you to dumb to use google and find it?
>
> :-)

im to dumb to

-- 
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:  
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>  phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>  voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking  
*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to  
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract  
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each  
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
  opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
  of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

-

On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL


on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist.  hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

-

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554280

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:14:48 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder
living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey),
socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117"
<root@127.0.0.1> wrote:

>On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:33:09 -0500, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:17:58 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder
>> living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey),
>> socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117"
>> <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:26:44 -0500, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>  
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:25:45 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
>>>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> so fakey, at what value of x (in seconds) is the value of the sum of
>>>>>> those
>>>>>> equations equal to 2550.25?
>>>>>
>>>>> Already answered,
>>>
>>> MID?
>>
>>
>> Are you to dumb to use google and find it?
>>
>> :-)
>
>im to dumb to

thanks for confirming and stuff.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554369

In article <b5tbcbd87o3e79bcjv0of2o835n2ha8alv@4ax.com>, 
skeet@invalid.invalid says...


> 
> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:14:48 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder
> living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey),
> socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117"
> <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:
> 
> >On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:33:09 -0500, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:17:58 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder
> >> living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey),
> >> socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117"
> >> <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:26:44 -0500, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>  
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:25:45 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
> >>>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>> so fakey, at what value of x (in seconds) is the value of the sum of
> >>>>>> those
> >>>>>> equations equal to 2550.25?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Already answered,
> >>>
> >>> MID?
> >>
> >>
> >> Are you to dumb to use google and find it?
> >>
> >> :-)
> >
> >im to dumb to
> 
> thanks for confirming and stuff.

Everybody dum.

-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554372

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:11:37 -0500, Checkmate, DoW #1  
<Lunatic.Fringe@the.edge> wrote:

> In article <b5tbcbd87o3e79bcjv0of2o835n2ha8alv@4ax.com>,
> skeet@invalid.invalid says...
>
>
>>
>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:14:48 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder
>> living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey),
>> socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117"
>> <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>>
>> >On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:33:09 -0500, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>  
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:17:58 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder
>> >> living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey),
>> >> socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117"
>> >> <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:26:44 -0500, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:25:45 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood  
>> Vote
>> >>>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>>> so fakey, at what value of x (in seconds) is the value of the  
>> sum of
>> >>>>>> those
>> >>>>>> equations equal to 2550.25?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Already answered,
>> >>>
>> >>> MID?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Are you to dumb to use google and find it?
>> >>
>> >> :-)
>> >
>> >im to dumb to
>>
>> thanks for confirming and stuff.
>
> Everybody dum.
>
hotel room-mum-mum-mum-mum-mumum...

https://soundcloud.com/djdizazter

-- 
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:  
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>  phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>  voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking  
*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to  
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract  
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each  
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
  opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
  of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

-

On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL


on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist.  hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

-

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554374

Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
> In article <b5tbcbd87o3e79bcjv0of2o835n2ha8alv@4ax.com>,
> skeet@invalid.invalid says...
> 
> 
>> 
>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:14:48 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder
>> living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey),
>> socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117"
>> <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:33:09 -0500, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
>>> wrote: 
>>> 
>>>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:17:58 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder
>>>> living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey),
>>>> socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117"
>>>> <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:26:44 -0500, Skeeter
>>>>> <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:25:45 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood
>>>>>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> so fakey, at what value of x (in seconds) is the value of the
>>>>>>>> sum of those
>>>>>>>> equations equal to 2550.25?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Already answered,
>>>>> 
>>>>> MID?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Are you to dumb to use google and find it?
>>>> 
>>>> :-)
>>> 
>>> im to dumb to
>> 
>> thanks for confirming and stuff.
> 
> Everybody dum.

i met him on a monday and my heart stood still , 
dey do dum dum dum dey do dum dum

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554457

On 18/02/2016 4:25 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:

>> Find the LCM of:
>> (numbers separated by commas)
>>
>> 5013, 1209, 150, 120, 33, 13
>>
>> Answer:
>> For the values: 5013, 1209, 150, 120, 33, 13
>> The LCM is: 4444525800
>
> Which you only figured out *after* LunkHead posted the same thing,
> giving you the first faint glimmer of kloo that all those sinewaves
> would constructively interfere to reach 2550.25 volts at a periodicity
> of 4444525800.

Wronggggg...

Since those values 5013, 1209, etc. are *frequencies* their LCM is the 
frequency of the lowest note that's a harmonic of them all, rather than 
a period.

The period of the sum of your six waves is 1 second -- as all of the 
frequencies are integer numbers of Hz, and their GCD is 1. After one 
second they all simultaneously hit zero again. In fact after half a 
second they should hit zero, as well, but the part of the waveform 
between 0.5s and 1s will be the mirror image of the part between 0s and 
0.5s.

Now, if you take fleebles to be units of one part in 4444525800 of a 
second, *then*:

- The sum's period is 4444525800 fleebles.
- The waves' zero crossings all occur on integer and half-integer
   fleebles.
- The waves' peaks and troughs all occur on quarter-integer fleebles.

Some of the waves never peak simultaneously. The 120 and 150Hz waves, 
again, serve as an example. The first has a period of 1/120 second, or 
4444525800/120 fleebles, or 37037715 fleebles, and the second, 29630172 
fleebles. It will be more convenient to work in quarter-fleebles, and 
then in another unit, though, so those are 148150860 and 118520688 
quarter-fleebles, respectively.

Now, 148150860 and 118520688 have a GCD of 29630172, but we want to keep 
a common divisor of 4 here, so let's make the bluzz equal to 7407543 
fleebles. In that case, the one period is 20 bluzzes and the other is 
16. Peaks occur one quarter cycle after their upward zero crossings, so 
the first one peaks at 5, 25, 45, etc. bluzzes, and the second peaks at 
4, 20, 36, etc. bluzzes.

I think you can see the problem now. The first numbers are all congruent 
to 1 mod 4, and the second are all divisible by 4. In fact the first 
ones are always odd numbers, and the second ones even! These two waves 
*never peak simultaneously*. They do hit zero simultaneously, at bluzz 
counts simultaneously divisible by 10 and 8 (half-periods), so at 0, 40, 
80, etc.; for example at 40 the 120Hz wave has completed two full cycles 
and is crossing zero upward, and the 150Hz wave has completed two and a 
half cycles and is crossing zero downward.

Note: a bluzz turns out to be 1/600 of a second, of course 600 being the 
LCM of 120 and 150.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554460

On 18/02/2016 7:19 PM, kensi wrote:

> Some of the waves never peak simultaneously. The 120 and 150Hz waves,
> again, serve as an example. The first has a period of 1/120 second, or
> 4444525800/120 fleebles, or 37037715 fleebles, and the second, 29630172
> fleebles. It will be more convenient to work in quarter-fleebles, and
> then in another unit, though, so those are 148150860 and 118520688
> quarter-fleebles, respectively.
>
> Now, 148150860 and 118520688 have a GCD of 29630172, but we want to keep
> a common divisor of 4 here, so let's make the bluzz equal to 7407543
> fleebles. In that case, the one period is 20 bluzzes and the other is
> 16. Peaks occur one quarter cycle after their upward zero crossings, so
> the first one peaks at 5, 25, 45, etc. bluzzes, and the second peaks at
> 4, 20, 36, etc. bluzzes.
>
> Note: a bluzz turns out to be 1/600 of a second, of course 600 being the
> LCM of 120 and 150.

Umm, actually the bluzz needs to be 7407543 quarter-fleebles to get 
these numbers (and is then 1/2400 of a second). Note that then gives 20 
bluzzes = 1/120 s and 16 = 1/150 s. Everything else is correct.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554489

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 19:27:08 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid>  
wrote:

> On 18/02/2016 7:19 PM, kensi wrote:
>
>> Some of the waves never peak simultaneously. The 120 and 150Hz waves,
>> again, serve as an example. The first has a period of 1/120 second, or
>> 4444525800/120 fleebles, or 37037715 fleebles, and the second, 29630172
>> fleebles. It will be more convenient to work in quarter-fleebles, and
>> then in another unit, though, so those are 148150860 and 118520688
>> quarter-fleebles, respectively.
>>
>> Now, 148150860 and 118520688 have a GCD of 29630172, but we want to keep
>> a common divisor of 4 here, so let's make the bluzz equal to 7407543
>> fleebles. In that case, the one period is 20 bluzzes and the other is
>> 16. Peaks occur one quarter cycle after their upward zero crossings, so
>> the first one peaks at 5, 25, 45, etc. bluzzes, and the second peaks at
>> 4, 20, 36, etc. bluzzes.
>>
>> Note: a bluzz turns out to be 1/600 of a second, of course 600 being the
>> LCM of 120 and 150.
>
> Umm, actually the bluzz needs to be 7407543 quarter-fleebles to get  
> these numbers (and is then 1/2400 of a second). Note that then gives 20  
> bluzzes = 1/120 s and 16 = 1/150 s. Everything else is correct.
>

once he finds some furrier transformers, he'll put an end to this  
quarrel.  LOL

the whole time he could have just graphed the damn sum of the equations,  
but HE'S TOO BLINDINGLY BRIGHT FOR THAT SORT OF NONSENSE.

-- 
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:  
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>  phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>  voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking  
*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to  
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract  
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each  
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
  opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
  of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

-

On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL


on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist.  hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

-

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554513

On 18/02/2016 9:22 PM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 
Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 
Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:

>> Umm, actually the bluzz needs to be 7407543 quarter-fleebles to get
>> these numbers (and is then 1/2400 of a second). Note that then gives
>> 20 bluzzes = 1/120 s and 16 = 1/150 s. Everything else is correct.
>
> once he finds some furrier transformers, he'll put an end to this
> quarrel.  LOL
>
> the whole time he could have just graphed the damn sum of the equations,
> but HE'S TOO BLINDINGLY BRIGHT FOR THAT SORT OF NONSENSE.

Even if he doesn't have a graphing calculator or Matlab or anything like 
that (and the d0rk likely doesn't) there's always this site (Javascript 
required, but not plugins):

https://www.desmos.com/calculator

Try plugging in "sin(x*pi*4)" and "sin(x*pi*5)", which have the same 
relative proportions as a 120Hz and a 150Hz sine curve. Note how the 
peaks never quite line up. Or put in "sin(x*pi*4)+sin(x*pi*5)" and note 
how the extrema are just a smidge short of +/-2.

Usefully, it puts gray dots at the zeros and extrema of a function, so 
you can go to one of those and see that it's at (0.11,1.97) (to three 
sig figs), falling short of 2.0 by a quantifiable distance of 0.03.

Ko0ky will undoubtedly declare that it's the "wrong equation" or screed 
about the supposed evils of gnuplot now.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554519

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 22:47:34 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid>  
wrote:

> On 18/02/2016 9:22 PM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907  
> Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907  
> Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
>
>>> Umm, actually the bluzz needs to be 7407543 quarter-fleebles to get
>>> these numbers (and is then 1/2400 of a second). Note that then gives
>>> 20 bluzzes = 1/120 s and 16 = 1/150 s. Everything else is correct.
>>
>> once he finds some furrier transformers, he'll put an end to this
>> quarrel.  LOL
>>
>> the whole time he could have just graphed the damn sum of the equations,
>> but HE'S TOO BLINDINGLY BRIGHT FOR THAT SORT OF NONSENSE.
>
> Even if he doesn't have a graphing calculator or Matlab or anything like  
> that (and the d0rk likely doesn't) there's always this site (Javascript  
> required, but not plugins):
>
> https://www.desmos.com/calculator
>
> Try plugging in "sin(x*pi*4)" and "sin(x*pi*5)", which have the same  
> relative proportions as a 120Hz and a 150Hz sine curve. Note how the  
> peaks never quite line up. Or put in "sin(x*pi*4)+sin(x*pi*5)" and note  
> how the extrema are just a smidge short of +/-2.

welp, it's settled.  fakey is a math magician.

> Usefully, it puts gray dots at the zeros and extrema of a function, so  
> you can go to one of those and see that it's at (0.11,1.97) (to three  
> sig figs), falling short of 2.0 by a quantifiable distance of 0.03.
>
> Ko0ky will undoubtedly declare that it's the "wrong equation" or screed  
> about the supposed evils of gnuplot now.
>

1) it's the wrong equation.
2) that graphing calculator website has a liberal bias.
3) yer mom.

-- 
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:  
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>  phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>  voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking  
*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to  
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract  
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each  
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
  opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
  of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

-

On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL


on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist.  hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

-

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554839

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Ko0O0oki kensi the lunkheaded libtard, in
<news:na6396$1v6p$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into
the wood chipper again:

> Even if he doesn't have a graphing calculator or Matlab or anything like 
> that (and the d0rk likely doesn't) there's always this site (Javascript 
> required, but not plugins):
> 
> https://www.desmos.com/calculator
> 
> Try plugging in "sin(x*pi*4)" and "sin(x*pi*5)", which have the same 
> relative proportions as a 120Hz and a 150Hz sine curve. Note how the 
> peaks never quite line up. Or put in "sin(x*pi*4)+sin(x*pi*5)" and note 
> how the extrema are just a smidge short of +/-2.
> 
> Usefully, it puts gray dots at the zeros and extrema of a function, so 
> you can go to one of those and see that it's at (0.11,1.97) (to three 
> sig figs), falling short of 2.0 by a quantifiable distance of 0.03.
> 
> Ko0ky will undoubtedly declare that it's the "wrong equation" or screed 
> about the supposed evils of gnuplot now.

That's for only two of the sinewaves in that six sinewave example. Do
you suppose those two sinewaves are somehow independent of the other
four, LunkHead?

Point of fact, you k'lamed the 120 Hz and 150 Hz sinewaves would only
cross (and thus maximally constructively interfere) approximately
1/4th of the way after it'd crossed zero... then you backpedaled and
admitted the two waveforms would only lose ~1.5% of the total peak
voltage. With all six sinewaves, it'd affect the end result even
less... I do note that neither you nor DildoRider have been able to
graph and sum those six sinewaves properly, LunkHead. I have, why
can't you?

<snicker>

Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com>
========================================================
========================================================
> <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800>  

Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by
coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda,
apparently.

And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team
on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole.

Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch
anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to
it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared
between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his
f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in
getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her
mouth!

Oh, here's Kensi:
<http://goo.gl/hdpXFC>

She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy?
I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice.

Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right
thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too.

<https://goo.gl/sbdRcq>

You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to
say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls
"sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go
kinky. LOL

> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ>

> P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited 
> any good telescopes lately?

Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control
capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right?

<snicker>
========================================================
========================================================

I note you've studiously avoided answering which observatories have
time standard control capability, LunkHead... only those who actually
work at an observatory would even know about such a thing, let alone
which observatories have that capability... but then, everyone knows
lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy wannabes always out their womanly socks
because they're too stoooopid to play the part of the identity they've
assumed. Perhaps for your next sock, you should play the part of a mop
jockey or a streetwalker... that'd be something you could handle,
dude.

<snicker>

-- 

Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554849

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded LibTard, in
<news:na5nhd$1hs1$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into
the wood chipper again:

> On 18/02/2016 7:19 PM, Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded LibTard bleated:

>> Some of the waves never peak simultaneously. The 120 and 150Hz waves,
>> again, serve as an example. The first has a period of 1/120 second, or
>> 4444525800/120 fleebles, or 37037715 fleebles, and the second, 29630172
>> fleebles. It will be more convenient to work in quarter-fleebles, and
>> then in another unit, though, so those are 148150860 and 118520688
>> quarter-fleebles, respectively.
>>
>> Now, 148150860 and 118520688 have a GCD of 29630172, but we want to keep
>> a common divisor of 4 here, so let's make the bluzz equal to 7407543
>> fleebles. In that case, the one period is 20 bluzzes and the other is
>> 16. Peaks occur one quarter cycle after their upward zero crossings, so
>> the first one peaks at 5, 25, 45, etc. bluzzes, and the second peaks at
>> 4, 20, 36, etc. bluzzes.
>>
>> Note: a bluzz turns out to be 1/600 of a second, of course 600 being the
>> LCM of 120 and 150.

"fleeble" LOL
"half-integer fleeble" LOL
"quarter-integer fleeble" LOL
"bluzz" LOL!

I've broken poor LunkHead's brain. Maybe next you can come up with the
Flooble and the Bleez. Then you can just start using ShroomTard-Speek,
thusly: Tos gleabis sp fecril fleeble 15 bluzz glorphed at 135 Fc.
LOL!

Because to a broken-brained freakishly deformed shroomtard, that'd
make sense. Seek immediate psychiatric intervention, LunkHead.

<snicker>

> Umm, actually the bluzz needs to be 7407543 quarter-fleebles to get 
> these numbers (and is then 1/2400 of a second). Note that then gives 20 
> bluzzes = 1/120 s and 16 = 1/150 s. Everything else is correct.

Bwahahaaaa! Poor shroomtard is melting down and making up fantasy
names to replace the math he doesn't understand. Now you pound your
keyboard some more and backpedal away from all that SPNAK!age you
took, as outlined in my .sig.

<snicker>

Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com>
========================================================
========================================================
> <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800>  

Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by
coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda,
apparently.

And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team
on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole.

Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch
anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to
it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared
between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his
f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in
getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her
mouth!

Oh, here's Kensi:
<http://goo.gl/hdpXFC>

She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy?
I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice.

Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right
thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too.

<https://goo.gl/sbdRcq>

You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to
say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls
"sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go
kinky. LOL

> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ>

> P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited 
> any good telescopes lately?

Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control
capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right?

<snicker>
========================================================
========================================================

I note you've studiously avoided answering which observatories have
time standard control capability, LunkHead... only those who actually
work at an observatory would even know about such a thing, let alone
which observatories have that capability... but then, everyone knows
lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy wannabes always out their womanly socks
because they're too stoooopid to play the part of the identity they've
assumed. Perhaps for your next sock, you should play the part of a mop
jockey or a streetwalker... that'd be something you could handle,
dude.

<snicker>

-- 

Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554823

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded Libtard, in
<news:na5n3c$1ha1$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into
the wood chipper again:

> On 18/02/2016 4:25 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
> Emeritus wrote:

>>> Find the LCM of:
>>> (numbers separated by commas)
>>>
>>> 5013, 1209, 150, 120, 33, 13
>>>
>>> Answer:
>>> For the values: 5013, 1209, 150, 120, 33, 13
>>> The LCM is: 4444525800

>> Which you only figured out *after* LunkHead posted the same thing,
>> giving you the first faint glimmer of kloo that all those sinewaves
>> would constructively interfere to reach 2550.25 volts at a periodicity
>> of 4444525800.

> Wronggggg...

Here we go again with LunkHead's kooky math. LOL

> Since those values 5013, 1209, etc. are *frequencies* their LCM is the 
> frequency of the lowest note that's a harmonic of them all, rather than 
> a period.

You stupid fuck. The period of each tributary sinewave is the inverse
of each tributary sinewave's frequency. The period of the resultant is
the inverse of the LCM of the frequencies of the tributaries. Thus,
the tributary sinewaves must repeat an integer number of times for the
resultant to fully "play out" and thus repeat.

Given the 6 interacting sinewaves at their respective frequencies, and
given a starting phase angle of 0 for each sinewave, the total maximum
constructive interference should occur at 1/2 the resultant's
periodicity and at integer fractions thereof, although it's such an
irregular periodic sinewave that to be sure one would have to graph
it.

SPNAK!

> The period of the sum of your six waves is 1 second -- as all of the 
> frequencies are integer numbers of Hz, and their GCD is 1. After one 
> second they all simultaneously hit zero again.

Bwahahahaaaaa! "After one second they all simultaneously hit zero
again"

Ah, my sides are hurting from laughing at your stupidity. Yet again
you demonstrate that you have no fucking clue. So just because
LunkHead says so, all six of the tributary sinewaves go to zero each
second, giving a beat frequency of 60 Hz. LOL!

> In fact after half a 
> second they should hit zero, as well, but the part of the waveform 
> between 0.5s and 1s will be the mirror image of the part between 0s and 
> 0.5s.

Now it's 0.5s... how about you go for 1/4s, or 1/10s, or
1/100000000s... hell, according to your kookmath, you can k'lame it's
a flat fucking line 100% of the time! Wait... isn't that what
DildoRider did?

Bwahahahaaaaa!

> Now, if you take fleebles to be units of one part in 4444525800 of a 
> second, *then*:

"fleebles" is newmath-speak for "I'm about to spew a bunch of stupid
shit on Usenet". LOL!

> - The sum's period is 4444525800 fleebles.
> - The waves' zero crossings all occur on integer and half-integer
>    fleebles.
> - The waves' peaks and troughs all occur on quarter-integer fleebles.

"integer and half-integer fleebles" LOL
"quarter-integer fleebles" LOL!

Let r be any number. r is a half-integer iff r=n/2 where n is an odd
integer.

So now LunkHead is k'laming that on odd integer time periods and on
all integer time periods (therefore on all integer time periods), all
the sinewaves magically dive to zero, and the anti-nodes occur at
imaginary "quarter-integer fleebles" that don't mathematically
exist... thereby demonstrating that LunkHead has no fucking clue what
he's talking about. LOL

Obviously LunkHead smoked, snorted, injected and ingested a bit too
much of the whackyshroom at Burning Man.

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-GDyy8bgi10>

"fleebles" LOL!

> Some of the waves never peak simultaneously.

Aren't you the math challenged moron who k'lamed the 120 Hz and 150 Hz
sinewaves would only cross approximately 1/4 of the way after crossing
zero? Then you backpedaled and later corrected, stating that their
peaks only gave up ~1.5% of the total constructive interference peak.

Moron. LOL

> The 120 and 150Hz waves, 
> again, serve as an example. The first has a period of 1/120 second, or 
> 4444525800/120 fleebles, or 37037715 fleebles, and the second, 29630172 
> fleebles. It will be more convenient to work in quarter-fleebles, and 
> then in another unit, though, so those are 148150860 and 118520688 
> quarter-fleebles, respectively.
> 
> Now, 148150860 and 118520688 have a GCD of 29630172, but we want to keep 
> a common divisor of 4 here, so let's make the bluzz equal to 7407543 
> fleebles. In that case, the one period is 20 bluzzes and the other is 
> 16. Peaks occur one quarter cycle after their upward zero crossings, so 
> the first one peaks at 5, 25, 45, etc. bluzzes, and the second peaks at 
> 4, 20, 36, etc. bluzzes.

Fleebles, half-fleebles, quarter-fleebles, bluzzes... whatever you're
on, get off it and get on the *correct* psychiatric medication,
LunkHead. LOL

> I think you can see the problem now.

Oh, I see the problem, alright... you've been dipping into the shrooms
too heavily. LOL!

> The first numbers are all congruent 
> to 1 mod 4, and the second are all divisible by 4. In fact the first 
> ones are always odd numbers, and the second ones even! These two waves 
> *never peak simultaneously*.

But that only affects those two sinewaves by a total of ~1.5% of the
peak voltage, and will have an even lower effect across all six
sinewaves. Like I said, it's a complex periodic waveform, it'd have to
be graphed to be sure, but one thing *is* sure... DildoRider's kooky
sinewave subtraction equation isn't correct. He's proven it, even
graphed it.

<snicker>

> They do hit zero simultaneously, at bluzz 
> counts simultaneously divisible by 10 and 8 (half-periods), so at 0, 40, 
> 80, etc.; for example at 40 the 120Hz wave has completed two full cycles 
> and is crossing zero upward, and the 150Hz wave has completed two and a 
> half cycles and is crossing zero downward.
> 
> Note: a bluzz turns out to be 1/600 of a second, of course 600 being the 
> LCM of 120 and 150.

"fleeble" LOL
"half-integer fleeble" LOL
"quarter-integer fleeble" LOL
"bluzz" LOL!

I've broken poor LunkHead's brain.

Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com>
========================================================
========================================================
> <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800>  

Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by
coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda,
apparently.

And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team
on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole.

Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch
anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to
it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared
between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his
f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in
getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her
mouth!

Oh, here's Kensi:
<http://goo.gl/hdpXFC>

She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy?
I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice.

Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right
thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too.

<https://goo.gl/sbdRcq>

You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to
say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls
"sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go
kinky. LOL

> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ>

> P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited 
> any good telescopes lately?

Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control
capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right?

<snicker>
========================================================
========================================================

I note you've studiously avoided answering which observatories have
time standard control capability, LunkHead... only those who actually
work at an observatory would even know about such a thing, let alone
which observatories have that capability... but then, everyone knows
lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy wannabes always out their womanly socks
because they're too stoooopid to play the part of the identity they've
assumed. Perhaps for your next sock, you should play the part of a mop
jockey or a streetwalker... that'd be something you could handle,
dude.

<snicker>

-- 

Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554851

On 19/02/2016 11:42 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:

> You stupid fuck. The period of each tributary sinewave is the inverse
> of each tributary sinewave's frequency. The period of the resultant is
> the inverse of the LCM of the frequencies of the tributaries.

You stupid fuck. That would make the period of the resultant *shorter* 
than the periods of the constituents, if there are constituents with 
different frequencies.

For instance, a frequency of 2 Hz and a frequency of 3 Hz will have 
periods of 1/2 and 1/3 second respectively. According to your ko0ky 
math, the resultant has a period of 1/lcm(2,3) = 1/6 second, which is 
obvious bullshit. (In fact the period of the resultant is 1/gcd, not 
1/lcm, and in this case that's 1.)

Ah, my sides are hurting from laughing at your stupidity. Yet again
you demonstrate that you have no fucking clue. So just because
Ko0kHead says so, the period of the resultant is shorter than any of the 
constituents' periods! Bwahahaha!

> all six of the tributary sinewaves go to zero each
> second, giving a beat frequency of 60 Hz.

WTF did you get 60 Hz from a period of 1 second?!?!?! They teach you 
that at some Konservative Kreationist KoOkSkOoL or something?

> <MUSHROOM CLOUD>

Gotta nuke the rest or I'll die laughing at this retard. It all followed 
from ludicrously flawed premises anyway; no further rebuttals necessary.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554858

In article <na923r$e4u$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid 
says...


> > <MUSHROOM CLOUD>
> 
> Gotta nuke the rest or I'll die laughing at this retard. It all followed 
> from ludicrously flawed premises anyway; no further rebuttals necessary.
 

Now you've done it!  You "ran away"!  The Fakeytard will claim victolly, 
because you "ran away" and he never gave up.  That's how you win on 
Usenet... right or wrong, you never quit arguing.  Come on, Paul... whip 
out that Checkmate Hammer of Thor, and throttle heeem!

-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554863

On 20/02/2016 2:04 AM, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
> In article <na923r$e4u$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid
> says...
>
>>> <MUSHROOM CLOUD>
>>
>> Gotta nuke the rest or I'll die laughing at this retard. It all followed
>> from ludicrously flawed premises anyway; no further rebuttals necessary.
>
> Now you've done it!  You "ran away"!  The Fakeytard will claim victolly,
> because you "ran away" and he never gave up.  That's how you win on
> Usenet... right or wrong, you never quit arguing.  Come on, Paul... whip
> out that Checkmate Hammer of Thor, and throttle heeem!

Who is "Paul", ko0ky? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web