Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #554489

Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong

Newsgroups alt.free.newsservers, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics
Subject Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong
References <op.yczs57j1tm21m2@benson.localhost> <4cb65069839de28ec05b23ebc76c65dd@dizum.com> <na5n3c$1ha1$1@gioia.aioe.org> <na5nhd$1hs1$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Date 2016-02-18 21:22 -0500
From "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1>
Organization AUKTard Polizia
Message-ID <op.yc158kxmtm21m2@benson.localhost> (permalink)

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 19:27:08 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid>  
wrote:

> On 18/02/2016 7:19 PM, kensi wrote:
>
>> Some of the waves never peak simultaneously. The 120 and 150Hz waves,
>> again, serve as an example. The first has a period of 1/120 second, or
>> 4444525800/120 fleebles, or 37037715 fleebles, and the second, 29630172
>> fleebles. It will be more convenient to work in quarter-fleebles, and
>> then in another unit, though, so those are 148150860 and 118520688
>> quarter-fleebles, respectively.
>>
>> Now, 148150860 and 118520688 have a GCD of 29630172, but we want to keep
>> a common divisor of 4 here, so let's make the bluzz equal to 7407543
>> fleebles. In that case, the one period is 20 bluzzes and the other is
>> 16. Peaks occur one quarter cycle after their upward zero crossings, so
>> the first one peaks at 5, 25, 45, etc. bluzzes, and the second peaks at
>> 4, 20, 36, etc. bluzzes.
>>
>> Note: a bluzz turns out to be 1/600 of a second, of course 600 being the
>> LCM of 120 and 150.
>
> Umm, actually the bluzz needs to be 7407543 quarter-fleebles to get  
> these numbers (and is then 1/2400 of a second). Note that then gives 20  
> bluzzes = 1/120 s and 16 = 1/150 s. Everything else is correct.
>

once he finds some furrier transformers, he'll put an end to this  
quarrel.  LOL

the whole time he could have just graphed the damn sum of the equations,  
but HE'S TOO BLINDINGLY BRIGHT FOR THAT SORT OF NONSENSE.

-- 
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:  
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>  phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>  voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking  
*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to  
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract  
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each  
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
  opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
  of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

-

On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL


on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist.  hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

-

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
 

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 10:25 +0100
  Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 06:26 -0700
    Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 10:17 -0500
      Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 08:33 -0700
        Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 11:14 -0500
          Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 09:43 -0700
            Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-18 13:11 -0800
              Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 16:13 -0500
              Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 14:20 -0700
  Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 19:19 -0500
    Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 19:27 -0500
      Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 21:22 -0500
        Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 22:47 -0500
          Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 22:56 -0500
          Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 06:30 +0100
      Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 07:30 +0100
    Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:42 +0100
      Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 01:45 -0500
        Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 23:04 -0800
          Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 02:17 -0500
          Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-20 08:04 +0000
        Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 18:15 +0100
          Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 10:27 -0700
          Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-21 19:02 +0800
            Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 07:15 +0100
              Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-22 15:32 +0800
                Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 19:05 +0100
                Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 11:27 -0700
                Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-23 02:45 +0800
                Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 12:00 -0700
                Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-23 03:16 +0800
                Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-22 19:28 +0000
                Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 12:41 -0700
                Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-22 20:07 +0000
        Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-20 15:29 -0500
          Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 16:21 -0500
          Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-20 22:09 +0000
            Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-20 16:14 -0800
              Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-21 12:07 +0800

csiph-web