Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.free.newsservers > #46815
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| References | <op.yczs57j1tm21m2@benson.localhost> <4cb65069839de28ec05b23ebc76c65dd@dizum.com> <na5n3c$1ha1$1@gioia.aioe.org> <na5nhd$1hs1$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| Subject | Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong |
| Message-ID | <74dcb2dbed83a2ece4123e50ccb04f04@dizum.com> (permalink) |
| Date | 2016-02-20 07:30 +0100 |
| Newsgroups | alt.free.newsservers, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics |
| Organization | dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded LibTard, in <news:na5nhd$1hs1$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On 18/02/2016 7:19 PM, Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded LibTard bleated: >> Some of the waves never peak simultaneously. The 120 and 150Hz waves, >> again, serve as an example. The first has a period of 1/120 second, or >> 4444525800/120 fleebles, or 37037715 fleebles, and the second, 29630172 >> fleebles. It will be more convenient to work in quarter-fleebles, and >> then in another unit, though, so those are 148150860 and 118520688 >> quarter-fleebles, respectively. >> >> Now, 148150860 and 118520688 have a GCD of 29630172, but we want to keep >> a common divisor of 4 here, so let's make the bluzz equal to 7407543 >> fleebles. In that case, the one period is 20 bluzzes and the other is >> 16. Peaks occur one quarter cycle after their upward zero crossings, so >> the first one peaks at 5, 25, 45, etc. bluzzes, and the second peaks at >> 4, 20, 36, etc. bluzzes. >> >> Note: a bluzz turns out to be 1/600 of a second, of course 600 being the >> LCM of 120 and 150. "fleeble" LOL "half-integer fleeble" LOL "quarter-integer fleeble" LOL "bluzz" LOL! I've broken poor LunkHead's brain. Maybe next you can come up with the Flooble and the Bleez. Then you can just start using ShroomTard-Speek, thusly: Tos gleabis sp fecril fleeble 15 bluzz glorphed at 135 Fc. LOL! Because to a broken-brained freakishly deformed shroomtard, that'd make sense. Seek immediate psychiatric intervention, LunkHead. <snicker> > Umm, actually the bluzz needs to be 7407543 quarter-fleebles to get > these numbers (and is then 1/2400 of a second). Note that then gives 20 > bluzzes = 1/120 s and 16 = 1/150 s. Everything else is correct. Bwahahaaaa! Poor shroomtard is melting down and making up fantasy names to replace the math he doesn't understand. Now you pound your keyboard some more and backpedal away from all that SPNAK!age you took, as outlined in my .sig. <snicker> Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com> ======================================================== ======================================================== > <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800> Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda, apparently. And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole. Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her mouth! Oh, here's Kensi: <http://goo.gl/hdpXFC> She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy? I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice. Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too. <https://goo.gl/sbdRcq> You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls "sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go kinky. LOL > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ> > P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited > any good telescopes lately? Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right? <snicker> ======================================================== ======================================================== I note you've studiously avoided answering which observatories have time standard control capability, LunkHead... only those who actually work at an observatory would even know about such a thing, let alone which observatories have that capability... but then, everyone knows lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy wannabes always out their womanly socks because they're too stoooopid to play the part of the identity they've assumed. Perhaps for your next sock, you should play the part of a mop jockey or a streetwalker... that'd be something you could handle, dude. <snicker> -- Kensi the moron wrote: ================================ The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so the curvature is 4*pi ================================ Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi. Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi Therefore, r = 0.28209479176 Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the units. The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect. Kensi the moron was corrected: ================================ Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you backpedal, LunkHead. You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore = (4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original "The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*? ================================ But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry problems. Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is "science fiction" and "a howler". In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold. He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature, and thus causing gravity to *repel*. Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of magnetic attraction. Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work, and therefore a universe which could not exist. Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation". Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow at 489 F. Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of "blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how spectral absorption and emission works. Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same moron continues to cling to his delusions. Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite. Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's intelligent... and failing badly. That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that struggles (and fails) to understand reality.
Back to alt.free.newsservers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 10:25 +0100
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 06:26 -0700
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 10:17 -0500
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 08:33 -0700
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 11:14 -0500
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 09:43 -0700
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-18 13:11 -0800
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 16:13 -0500
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 14:20 -0700
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 19:19 -0500
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 19:27 -0500
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 21:22 -0500
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 22:47 -0500
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 22:56 -0500
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 06:30 +0100
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 07:30 +0100
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:42 +0100
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 01:45 -0500
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 23:04 -0800
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 02:17 -0500
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-20 08:04 +0000
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 18:15 +0100
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 10:27 -0700
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-21 19:02 +0800
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 07:15 +0100
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-22 15:32 +0800
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 19:05 +0100
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 11:27 -0700
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-23 02:45 +0800
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 12:00 -0700
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-23 03:16 +0800
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-22 19:28 +0000
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 12:41 -0700
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-22 20:07 +0000
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-20 15:29 -0500
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 16:21 -0500
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-20 22:09 +0000
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-20 16:14 -0800
Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-21 12:07 +0800
csiph-web