Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #528954 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-10-29 15:49 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-11-02 01:06 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 43 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Editorial Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 15:49 -0500
Re: Editorial gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-10-29 16:21 -0500
Re: Editorial jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-29 21:24 +0000
Re: Editorial Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 18:59 -0500
Re: Editorial jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-30 05:04 +0000
Re: Editorial Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 08:25 -0500
Re: Editorial jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-30 16:58 +0000
Re: Editorial "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 11:14 -0800
Re: Editorial Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-29 21:52 +0000
Re: Editorial dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-10-30 07:20 -0400
Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 07:22 -0700
Re: Editorial dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-10-31 07:19 -0400
Re: Editorial Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-31 18:14 +0000
Re: Editorial dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-10-31 17:15 -0400
Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 11:13 -0700
Re: Editorial dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-10-31 17:14 -0400
Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 16:28 -0700
Re: Editorial xxein1@att.net - 2015-10-31 18:20 -0700
Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 01:54 -0800
Re: Editorial "Bobby Enriquez" <invalide@eyample.com> - 2015-11-01 06:36 -0800
Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 07:35 -0800
Re: Editorial "Mike Smith" <invalidd@example.com> - 2015-11-01 09:06 -0800
Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 09:32 -0800
Re: Editorial "Hank Hill" <invalidd@example.com> - 2015-11-01 11:03 -0800
Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 11:25 -0800
Re: Editorial gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-01 23:18 -0600
Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 04:02 -0800
Re: Editorial gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-02 08:41 -0600
Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 07:34 -0800
Re: Editorial "Maple Hall" <invalud@example.com> - 2015-11-02 07:01 -0800
Re: Editorial dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-01 10:36 -0500
Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 07:55 -0800
Re: Editorial Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2015-10-30 11:32 -0400
Re: Editorial "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 13:18 -0700
Re: Editorial jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-30 20:36 +0000
Re: Editorial pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-10-30 15:18 -0700
Re: Editorial "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 23:16 -0700
Re: Editorial dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-10-31 07:42 -0400
Re: Editorial Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 18:54 -0500
Re: Editorial Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 18:51 -0500
Re: Editorial David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> - 2015-11-01 18:59 -0500
Re: Editorial Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 19:32 -0600
Re: Editorial benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 01:06 -0500
Page 1 of 3 [1] 2 3 Next page →
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 15:49 -0500 |
| Subject | Editorial |
| Message-ID | <GuOdnTT0eeT8G6_LnZ2dnUU7-KmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Some think I post links to news articles from the physics community to add a bit of fresh water to the, otherwise, river of shit, as Uncle Al calls it. Some think I'm posting for a psychology class at Iowa State that is accumulating data on poster responses, one poster in particular. When I was hired by Iowa State, it was made clear that we should contribute back to the community, the people of Iowa, and to the world, in addition to the teaching and research we did. I have always taken that seriously. I was an Associate Scientist and Principal Investigator while at Iowa State. I have taught at the university, community college and adult education levels for at least the last twenty years. And still do in retirement, contributing without pay of any kind. I post from the physics communities to educate, stimulate and foster better understanding and discussion. Yes discussion, not name calling. As in any population, there is a percentage that suffer from mental illness or obsessive behaviors. Other are here to play games and seek attention. Those that find my posts disgusting or a waste of time should learn to skip, delete or use a kill-file. It's easy to do. What I post is interesting to me and hopefully to others. Good cheer to all. -Sam -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 16:21 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n0u2lf$stf$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #528954 |
On 10/29/2015 3:49 PM, Sam Wormley wrote: > > > Some think I post links to news articles from the physics community > to add a bit of fresh water to the, otherwise, river of shit, as > Uncle Al calls it. > > Some think I'm posting for a psychology class at Iowa State that is > accumulating data on poster responses, one poster in particular. > > When I was hired by Iowa State, it was made clear that we should > contribute back to the community, the people of Iowa, and to the > world, in addition to the teaching and research we did. I have always > taken that seriously. > > I was an Associate Scientist and Principal Investigator while at Iowa > State. I have taught at the university, community college and adult > education levels for at least the last twenty years. And still do in > retirement, contributing without pay of any kind. > > I post from the physics communities to educate, stimulate and foster > better understanding and discussion. Yes discussion, not name calling. > > As in any population, there is a percentage that suffer from mental > illness or obsessive behaviors. Other are here to play games and seek > attention. Those that find my posts disgusting or a waste of time > should learn to skip, delete or use a kill-file. It's easy to do. > > What I post is interesting to me and hopefully to others. Good cheer > to all. > > -Sam > > > > > here here ! I'm glad your posting the links, I don't have much time to look around for articals, and many of your posted articals are very interesting state of the art. I think some responders go for humor in posting replies, which instead comes across as flat or too negitive when read, that's just the nature of email/posting. and you are right about adding fresh water, it needs it for sure. Thanks Sam
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 21:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <8dfagc-03q.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #528954 |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Some think I post links to news articles from the physics community > to add a bit of fresh water to the, otherwise, river of shit, as > Uncle Al calls it. You are a major contributor to the river of shit with off topic links, links to arm waving puff pieces, ancient news presented as recent, and other such nonsense. > Some think I'm posting for a psychology class at Iowa State that is > accumulating data on poster responses, one poster in particular. Nope, you have been at it too long for that. > When I was hired by Iowa State, it was made clear that we should > contribute back to the community, the people of Iowa, and to the > world, in addition to the teaching and research we did. I have always > taken that seriously. Try doing something on your own, i.e. something original instead of grade school level cut and paste. > I was an Associate Scientist and Principal Investigator while at Iowa > State. I have taught at the university, community college and adult > education levels for at least the last twenty years. And still do in > retirement, contributing without pay of any kind. How selfless of you; spend more time at that and less time cut and pasting publicly available, off topic crap to a physics discussion group. > I post from the physics communities to educate, stimulate and foster > better understanding and discussion. Yes discussion, not name calling. Then why is it you resist discussing anything? Why is it comments and questions to you get a response of the exact same cut and paste? Is it that you don't understand your own cut and paste links and are incapable of discussing them? Why is it in the VERY rare occasion you actually respond to a question with your own words it is to attempt to either change the topic or put up a red herring? > As in any population, there is a percentage that suffer from mental > illness or obsessive behaviors. Other are here to play games and seek > attention. Those that find my posts disgusting or a waste of time > should learn to skip, delete or use a kill-file. It's easy to do. Or you could actually do what you claim to do. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 18:59 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <DIqdnRm0rK1oL6_LnZ2dnUU7-W-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #528961 |
Some think I post links to news articles from the physics community to add a bit of fresh water to the, otherwise, river of shit, as Uncle Al calls it. Some think I'm posting for a psychology class at Iowa State that is accumulating data on poster responses, one poster in particular. When I was hired by Iowa State, it was made clear that we should contribute back to the community, the people of Iowa, and to the world, in addition to the teaching and research we did. I have always taken that seriously. I was an Associate Scientist and Principal Investigator while at Iowa State. I have taught at the university, community college and adult education levels for at least the last twenty years. And still do in retirement, contributing without pay of any kind. I post from the physics communities to educate, stimulate and foster better understanding and discussion. Yes discussion, not name calling. As in any population, there is a percentage that suffer from mental illness or obsessive behaviors. Other are here to play games and seek attention. Those that find my posts disgusting or a waste of time should learn to skip, delete or use a kill-file. It's easy to do. What I post is interesting to me and hopefully to others. Good cheer to all. -Sam -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-30 05:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <7babgc-los.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #529005 |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > > Some think I post links to news articles from the physics community > to add a bit of fresh water to the, otherwise, river of shit, as > Uncle Al calls it. > > Some think I'm posting for a psychology class at Iowa State that is > accumulating data on poster responses, one poster in particular. > > When I was hired by Iowa State, it was made clear that we should > contribute back to the community, the people of Iowa, and to the > world, in addition to the teaching and research we did. I have always > taken that seriously. > > I was an Associate Scientist and Principal Investigator while at Iowa > State. I have taught at the university, community college and adult > education levels for at least the last twenty years. And still do in > retirement, contributing without pay of any kind. > > I post from the physics communities to educate, stimulate and foster > better understanding and discussion. Yes discussion, not name calling. You, as always, have no discussion in regards to my comments on this post and mearly repeated the post. > As in any population, there is a percentage that suffer from mental > illness or obsessive behaviors. Other are here to play games and seek > attention. Those that find my posts disgusting or a waste of time > should learn to skip, delete or use a kill-file. It's easy to do. > > What I post is interesting to me and hopefully to others. Good cheer > to all. Yet you felt the need to defend yourself from criticism and justify your spamming. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-30 08:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <9fOdnWC4pPBc8q7LnZ2dnUU7-f-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #529081 |
On 10/30/15 12:04 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > You, as always, have no discussion in regards to my comments on this post > and mearly repeated the post. The poor jump is having trouble finding people to discuss stuff with him. Maybe it's his breath, or his bullying or inappropriate language. He huffs and puffs, with no progress. Name callers like jimp, can greatly benefit from these anger management classes. > http://yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-30 16:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <o6kcgc-pv3.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #529119 |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > On 10/30/15 12:04 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> You, as always, have no discussion in regards to my comments on this post >> and mearly repeated the post. > > > > > The poor jump is having trouble finding people to discuss stuff with It appears that your cut and pastes are not worth discussing, ass hole. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-01 11:14 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <00af95f7-9f23-4aa9-8b3a-43cd9f923231@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #529119 |
On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 6:25:25 AM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote: > On 10/30/15 12:04 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > > You, as always, have no discussion in regards to my comments on this post > > and mearly repeated the post. > > > > > The poor jump is having trouble finding people to discuss stuff with > him. Maybe it's his breath, or his bullying or inappropriate language. > He huffs and puffs, with no progress. > > Name callers like jimp, can greatly benefit from these anger > management classes. > > http://yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes > > > > -- > > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics > community, and physics-related social issues. Sam I like reading your posts over the years.Of late you do not post any of your own thinking.When asked a question you do not respond.I find that not to my thinking.I like to post mostly my own ideas as you know.Good or bad my head is on my own shoulders.TreBert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 21:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pan.2015.10.29.21.52.47@localhost.localdomain> |
| In reply to | #528954 |
On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 15:49:37 -0500, Sam Wormley wrote: > > we should > contribute back to the community [with an Apple product] > Ha, ha, ha, ha! I knew that the responses to this would include both pro and con. Some will agree and some will disagree. How wonderfully libertarian. The sad truth, however, is that a discussion group is not the place for news aggregation (if you want it there is plenty of cheap software for it). Furthermore, the aggregation of debased, puerile, and sophomoric science news is especially inappropriate. Discussion involves a sincere and freeform inquiry as well as a spontaneous and unstructured exchange. The prepackaged jabber of popular journalists does not qualify.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-30 07:20 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <d9h23nFueotU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #528972 |
On 10/29/2015 5:52 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: > On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 15:49:37 -0500, Sam Wormley wrote: > >> we should >> contribute back to the community [with an Apple product] It's bad form to post-edit other people's words, especially with commercial endorsements. > Ha, ha, ha, ha! I knew that the responses to this would include both > pro and con. Some will agree and some will disagree. How wonderfully > libertarian. ...and wonderfully Usenettian, to coin a word. Everyone is free to post what they will in an unmoderated forum like s.p. > The sad truth, however, is that a discussion group is not the place > for news aggregation (if you want it there is plenty of cheap software > for it). Furthermore, the aggregation of debased, puerile, and sophomoric > science news is especially inappropriate. Sounds like you'd like to moderate the posts in here according to what you believe is appropriate. > Discussion involves a sincere and freeform inquiry as well as a spontaneous > and unstructured exchange. The prepackaged jabber of popular journalists > does not qualify. Yet it sounds like you'd like to structure the postings according to what you believe qualifies. If a poster's contributions don't measure up to your standards you can always kill-file him or her. -- dvus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-30 07:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a2363b2d-7611-418a-b17e-fde6e30cac8d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #529109 |
On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 7:20:30 AM UTC-4, dvus wrote: > On 10/29/2015 5:52 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 15:49:37 -0500, Sam Wormley wrote: > > > >> we should > >> contribute back to the community [with an Apple product] > > It's bad form to post-edit other people's words, especially with > commercial endorsements. That is a major hurdle to deal with one, of many, Usenet's failings. Nobody else should be allowed to edit any post they are responding to. Nobody's, not even one's own post should be alterable. > > Ha, ha, ha, ha! I knew that the responses to this would include both > > pro and con. Some will agree and some will disagree. How wonderfully > > libertarian. > > ...and wonderfully Usenettian, to coin a word. Everyone is free to post > what they will in an unmoderated forum like s.p. https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=Usenettian, so fairly new word. However, you can search for "Usenetian" or "Usenet Ian" getting many results. > > The sad truth, however, is that a discussion group is not the place > > for news aggregation (if you want it there is plenty of cheap software > > for it). Furthermore, the aggregation of debased, puerile, and sophomoric > > science news is especially inappropriate. > > Sounds like you'd like to moderate the posts in here according to what > you believe is appropriate. More likely Fabian would like to raise the quality of discussions. Unmoderated NGs have always been quality controlled by their community. Sam would do well to start his own moderated NG. > > Discussion involves a sincere and freeform inquiry as well as a spontaneous > > and unstructured exchange. The prepackaged jabber of popular journalists > > does not qualify. I like that. All, however popular, journalism has always been about product placement or advertising specific institutions or promoting short-listed peer-reviewed approved authors. The prepackaged jabber just leads to dull and boring same-old homogenous literature. iApple! > Yet it sounds like you'd like to structure the postings according to > what you believe qualifies. Nettiquete. Read all about it. Did I make a typo? Again... darn. https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=Nettiquete > If a poster's contributions don't measure up to your standards you can > always kill-file him or her. > > -- dvus I notice you dvus are very new to Usenet, like only four posts. Why? Killfiles are rather a bad idea, in retrospect. Would you not want to correct abusive posters/trolls that would and do spread falsehoods about other people on Usenet? Anonymized Nym-shifting psychotic behaviour ought be prevented from happening. Repeated, routinely, deliberately editing others' content; effectively attributing words to someone else who never wrote them, is another major Usenet weakness. Usenet NNTP servers end up propagating Sam's count of unwelcomed bits. Perhaps bits are still not cheap for all those download NGs. For part of 2015 alone, here's Sam's count of posts: Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 283 890 618 602 607 Sam must be the most well read human on Earth, discussing ||0||! If Sam, or anyone, displayed his kind of behaviour in a physical discussion room, he would be hauled out of the building. Period. Sam Worm Lie hounds this NG like there's no consequence of having a posting history. Sam claims that jimp waits for his daily cut and pastes. Seriously? Who in hell needs to wait?! What wait? Oye. Sam Wormley, the greatest hypocrite in this NG, of all time, projects he is providing a service by hogging all bandwidth without more than a single word of 'discussion' or his always poorly written one sentence responses. Sam is the psychology experiment of Unmoderated Gone Mad. There are only a handful of readers and posters on any given NG. Sam bombarding them with copyright violating posts demonstrates a severe misunderstanding of the Usenet Charter, in any language. It's also very poor marketing. It's not even very good propoganda. Most of all, his contribution is not a discussion. -- Mahipal "IPMM, wow I get four whole lines for a signature?!" In today's media -- paper or otherwise -- Comedians want for being Journalists while Journalism has become Comedy. Very JCJC or CJCJ...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-31 07:19 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <d9jme3Fk8t2U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #529132 |
On 10/30/2015 10:22 AM, Mahipal wrote: > On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 7:20:30 AM UTC-4, dvus wrote: >> On 10/29/2015 5:52 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: >>> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 15:49:37 -0500, Sam Wormley wrote: >>> >>>> we should >>>> contribute back to the community [with an Apple product] >> >> It's bad form to post-edit other people's words, especially with >> commercial endorsements. > > That is a major hurdle to deal with one, of many, Usenet's > failings. Nobody else should be allowed to edit any post they are > responding to. Nobody's, not even one's own post should be alterable. We all post subject to our provider's TOS. Beyond that, unless posting in a moderated group, Usenet is self-policing. Often, bringing unacceptable behavior to a poster's attention is all that's needed. >>> Ha, ha, ha, ha! I knew that the responses to this would include both >>> pro and con. Some will agree and some will disagree. How wonderfully >>> libertarian. >> >> ...and wonderfully Usenettian, to coin a word. Everyone is free to post >> what they will in an unmoderated forum like s.p. > > https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=Usenettian, so fairly new word. > However, you can search for "Usenetian" or "Usenet Ian" getting many results. Just proves that great minds think alike. >>> The sad truth, however, is that a discussion group is not the place >>> for news aggregation (if you want it there is plenty of cheap software >>> for it). Furthermore, the aggregation of debased, puerile, and sophomoric >>> science news is especially inappropriate. >> >> Sounds like you'd like to moderate the posts in here according to what >> you believe is appropriate. > > More likely Fabian would like to raise the quality of discussions. Then he should post quality material instead of telling others what they should or should not post. > Unmoderated NGs have always been quality controlled by their > community. Sam would do well to start his own moderated NG. Why? The group in its present form seems to be working fine. If there are those who wish to form a moderated group there's a process for that. >>> Discussion involves a sincere and freeform inquiry as well as a spontaneous >>> and unstructured exchange. The prepackaged jabber of popular journalists >>> does not qualify. > > I like that. All, however popular, journalism has always been about > product placement or advertising specific institutions or promoting > short-listed peer-reviewed approved authors. The prepackaged jabber > just leads to dull and boring same-old homogenous literature. iApple! > >> Yet it sounds like you'd like to structure the postings according to >> what you believe qualifies. > > Nettiquete. Read all about it. Did I make a typo? Again... darn. > https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=Nettiquete I'm not a member of the grammar police so don't expect me to correct (or point out) yours. As long as I can extract the gist of your remarks I'm good to go. That said, it seems you feel Wormley has committed a breach of Netiquette by posting excerpts from scientific sources in a scientific newsgroup. I don't agree, but that's the beauty of Usenet. We get to disagree without worrying the Usenet police will come for us in the middle of the night! >> If a poster's contributions don't measure up to your standards you can >> always kill-file him or her. > > I notice you dvus are very new to Usenet, like only four posts. Why? Heh, you notice wrongly. But that's not important, on Usenet even beginners are welcome. > Killfiles are rather a bad idea, in retrospect. Would you not want to > correct abusive posters/trolls that would and do spread falsehoods > about other people on Usenet? Anonymized Nym-shifting psychotic > behaviour ought be prevented from happening. Repeated, routinely, > deliberately editing others' content; effectively attributing words to > someone else who never wrote them, is another major Usenet weakness. I have no desire to prevent anyone from saying anything. If I don't like something someone posts I'll say so, but I'll defend to the end their right to post what they wish in an unmoderated group. Remember, group names and even charters of unmoderated groups are merely advisory. If someone doesn't like reading an author's words he can kill-file him. > Usenet NNTP servers end up propagating Sam's count of unwelcomed > bits. Perhaps bits are still not cheap for all those download NGs. > For part of 2015 alone, here's Sam's count of posts: > Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct > 283 890 618 602 607 > > Sam must be the most well read human on Earth, discussing ||0||! Good for him! If I didn't like what he posted I'd simply make sure I never saw it again. As it happens, I peruse everything he posts. It's unfortunate I have to also read the cut-n-paste replies of that other whiner, but that's Usenet for you. You take the good with the bad. > If Sam, or anyone, displayed his kind of behaviour in a physical > discussion room, he would be hauled out of the building. Period. Have you considered that if there were rules against what he posts he might not do it? Since there isn't there's no reason for him not to. > Sam Worm Lie hounds this NG like there's no consequence of having a > posting history. Sam claims that jimp waits for his daily cut and > pastes. Seriously? Who in hell needs to wait?! What wait? Oye. Heh, nice ad hominem there. AFAIC, whether jimp waits or not is irrelevant. > Sam Wormley, the greatest hypocrite in this NG, of all time, projects > he is providing a service by hogging all bandwidth without more than a > single word of 'discussion' or his always poorly written one sentence > responses. Sam is the psychology experiment of Unmoderated Gone Mad. You're accusing Wormley of violating rules that don't exist. That's not nice! > There are only a handful of readers and posters on any given NG. Sam > bombarding them with copyright violating posts demonstrates a severe > misunderstanding of the Usenet Charter, in any language. It's also > very poor marketing. It's not even very good propoganda. Most of all, > his contribution is not a discussion. I'm aware of no rule that states one must include any original content in ones posts. If you know of such a rule please cite it. > -- Mahipal "IPMM, wow I get four whole lines for a signature?!" > In today's media -- paper or otherwise -- Comedians want for being > Journalists while Journalism has become Comedy. Very JCJC or CJCJ... > BTW, you're using unconventional syntax in your .sig. The "-- " delineator should be on a line by itself in order to be properly read and acted upon by a reader's news client. -- dvus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-31 18:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pan.2015.10.31.18.12.25@localhost.localdomain> |
| In reply to | #529398 |
On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 07:19:06 -0400, dvus wrote: > > The group in its present form seems to be working fine. > You just shot yourself in the head with that statement. Any credibility that you may have had is now completely quashed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-31 17:15 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <d9kpbqFt1rlU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #529447 |
On 10/31/2015 2:14 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: > On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 07:19:06 -0400, dvus wrote: > >> >> The group in its present form seems to be working fine. >> > > You just shot yourself in the head with that statement. > > Any credibility that you may have had is now completely quashed. Well, I didn't say it's working for you. I'm enjoying it just fine. -- dvus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-31 11:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ff15291e-0148-4ebd-bdfd-4f3f23843922@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #529398 |
On Saturday, October 31, 2015 at 7:19:36 AM UTC-4, dvus wrote: > On 10/30/2015 10:22 AM, Mahipal wrote: > > On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 7:20:30 AM UTC-4, dvus wrote: > >> On 10/29/2015 5:52 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: > >>> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 15:49:37 -0500, Sam Wormley wrote: > >>> > >>>> we should > >>>> contribute back to the community [with an Apple product] > >> > >> It's bad form to post-edit other people's words, especially with > >> commercial endorsements. > > > > That is a major hurdle to deal with one, of many, Usenet's > > failings. Nobody else should be allowed to edit any post they are > > responding to. Nobody's, not even one's own post should be alterable. > > We all post subject to our provider's TOS. Beyond that, unless posting > in a moderated group, Usenet is self-policing. Often, bringing > unacceptable behavior to a poster's attention is all that's needed. Policing? Like in Police? I'm not allowed to write about any Police. > >>> Ha, ha, ha, ha! I knew that the responses to this would include both > >>> pro and con. Some will agree and some will disagree. How wonderfully > >>> libertarian. > >> > >> ...and wonderfully Usenettian, to coin a word. Everyone is free to post > >> what they will in an unmoderated forum like s.p. > > > > https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=Usenettian, so fairly new word. > > However, you can search for "Usenetian" or "Usenet Ian" getting many results. > > Just proves that great minds think alike. Or just can't type. Great minds have names, not mere self-praising ego. > >>> The sad truth, however, is that a discussion group is not the place > >>> for news aggregation (if you want it there is plenty of cheap software > >>> for it). Furthermore, the aggregation of debased, puerile, and sophomoric > >>> science news is especially inappropriate. > >> > >> Sounds like you'd like to moderate the posts in here according to what > >> you believe is appropriate. > > > > More likely Fabian would like to raise the quality of discussions. > > Then he should post quality material instead of telling others what they > should or should not post. Fabian's quality of discussion in only a few posts has already surpassed the quality of any content Sam Wormley (SW) has provided -- combined, cummulative, cut&repasted -- ever since his first post like 54321+ posts ago. What are you dvus, SW's algorithm handler/provider? > > Unmoderated NGs have always been quality controlled by their > > community. Sam would do well to start his own moderated NG. > > Why? The group in its present form seems to be working fine. If there > are those who wish to form a moderated group there's a process for that. The group is working just fine?! This NG is fine? You have your own set of definitions for words, I presume, too. All we get to do is try to get misanthrope Sam to STFU. Tell Sam's handlers to pull his and their own psychotic plug. Trust me, I'm being very Very VERY polite. > >>> Discussion involves a sincere and freeform inquiry as well as a spontaneous > >>> and unstructured exchange. The prepackaged jabber of popular journalists > >>> does not qualify. > > > > I like that. All, however popular, journalism has always been about > > product placement or advertising specific institutions or promoting > > short-listed peer-reviewed approved authors. The prepackaged jabber > > just leads to dull and boring same-old homogenous literature. iApple! > > > >> Yet it sounds like you'd like to structure the postings according to > >> what you believe qualifies. > > > > Nettiquete. Read all about it. Did I make a typo? Again... darn. > > https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=Nettiquete > > I'm not a member of the grammar police so don't expect me to correct (or > point out) yours. As long as I can extract the gist of your remarks I'm > good to go. Spelling in science groups is rather a minor complaint given that the vast majority of scientists are actually foreign to the English language. Hell, I've been in crowded physics and engineering graduate classes, as many as five students huddled together, like in any no-brains@all TV_SITCOM (i.e., TBBT and every other sitcom else) ... even the professors are English Pronunciation Challenged (EPC). If you want a career in Miss Spelling, go into Marketing, YouAssOfA@#. > That said, it seems you feel Wormley has committed a breach of > Netiquette by posting excerpts from scientific sources in a scientific > newsgroup. I don't agree, but that's the beauty of Usenet. We get to > disagree without worrying the Usenet police will come for us in the > middle of the night! More police? You should know I helped engineer police tech, from their guns, cars, lasers, body cameras, heat, coffee, donuts, databases E-ZPass or BigDataBrother of WhatSoFuckYouEver@# fame, their over weightness, bad haircuts, bald females, their macho high school dropout sadistic attitudes, pathetic uniformed storm trooper looks, their we are not of the people demeanor... o shit... traffic cop on my ass again. I knew I should've got my tail and its light fixed. Damn damn DAMN! What's my skin tone today, now?! Damn damn DMAN Squared! It's been real folks. Bye bye BYE. I've to run to get shot now. > >> If a poster's contributions don't measure up to your standards you can > >> always kill-file him or her. > > > > I notice you dvus are very new to Usenet, like only four posts. Why? > > Heh, you notice wrongly. But that's not important, on Usenet even > beginners are welcome. Your doublespeak indicates you are no newborn to Usenet. How nice. I rely on the digital technology that tracks every keystroke ever submitted to the WWW, of which Usenet is a mere subset. If said SW tech is wrong, in error, which it very well could be since all the development work is outsourced to ...youKnow, while all the real brainy talent remains unemployed in WestVA, so... give me links to your subject matter history. Or, better still, retype every word you ever had the chance to write. Word for word, by Tuesday. Tia. > > Killfiles are rather a bad idea, in retrospect. Would you not want to > > correct abusive posters/trolls that would and do spread falsehoods > > about other people on Usenet? Anonymized Nym-shifting psychotic > > behaviour ought be prevented from happening. Repeated, routinely, > > deliberately editing others' content; effectively attributing words to > > someone else who never wrote them, is another major Usenet weakness. > > I have no desire to prevent anyone from saying anything. If I don't like > something someone posts I'll say so, but I'll defend to the end their > right to post what they wish in an unmoderated group. Remember, group > names and even charters of unmoderated groups are merely advisory. If > someone doesn't like reading an author's words he can kill-file him. You're infatuation with kill-files is strong. Are you in many of them? Or... would you==dvus care to publicize your own never-ending killfile? Ftr, anybody who has posted their kill-file lists, only amounted to a forgetful pile of heaping stinking this ...youKnow. Moral: If all you got from Usenet is killfiles, then you really ought go someplace else and find a worth your while hobby. Conundrum: Why do posters crap on Usenet to land in killfiles? Oye. Lesson: You may waste your own life's time, don't waste others'. > > Usenet NNTP servers end up propagating Sam's count of unwelcomed > > bits. Perhaps bits are still not cheap for all those download NGs. > > For part of 2015 alone, here's Sam's count of posts: > > Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct > > 283 890 618 602 607 > > > > Sam must be the most well read human on Earth, discussing ||0||! > > Good for him! If I didn't like what he posted I'd simply make sure I > never saw it again. As it happens, I peruse everything he posts. It's > unfortunate I have to also read the cut-n-paste replies of that other > whiner, but that's Usenet for you. You take the good with the bad. Jim Pennino is allowed to cut and paste his own words/writings. Duh. > > If Sam, or anyone, displayed his kind of behaviour in a physical > > discussion room, he would be hauled out of the building. Period. > > Have you considered that if there were rules against what he posts he > might not do it? Since there isn't there's no reason for him not to. Yes, I have. Also, my motto too is 'Rules? There Are No Rules!' > > Sam Worm Lie hounds this NG like there's no consequence of having a > > posting history. Sam claims that jimp waits for his daily cut and > > pastes. Seriously? Who in hell needs to wait?! What wait? Oye. > > Heh, nice ad hominem there. AFAIC, whether jimp waits or not is irrelevant. Whether Sam writes that Jim Pennino waits is relevant. If I wanted just to hear people call eachother ad hominem insults, I would've stayed married. > > Sam Wormley, the greatest hypocrite in this NG, of all time, projects > > he is providing a service by hogging all bandwidth without more than a > > single word of 'discussion' or his always poorly written one sentence > > responses. Sam is the psychology experiment of Unmoderated Gone Mad. > > You're accusing Wormley of violating rules that don't exist. That's not > nice! I measurably do not complain that much about spellings or grammar. If my teachers/professors who grade me for my potentially marketable Yawn Career@#, then I will desperately bitch: How in Hell is Sam a Professor?! > > There are only a handful of readers and posters on any given NG. Sam > > bombarding them with copyright violating posts demonstrates a severe > > misunderstanding of the Usenet Charter, in any language. It's also > > very poor marketing. It's not even very good propoganda. Most of all, > > his contribution is not a discussion. > > I'm aware of no rule that states one must include any original content > in ones posts. If you know of such a rule please cite it. Copyright Laws, within USA or WIPO, for one. If you have no original content, or mere original discussion of other's content, of your own, then stay the fuck off of your key SEND buttons. > > -- Mahipal "IPMM, wow I get four whole lines for a signature?!" > > In today's media -- paper or otherwise -- Comedians want for being > > Journalists while Journalism has become Comedy. Very JCJC or CJCJ... > > > BTW, you're using unconventional syntax in your .sig. The "-- " > delineator should be on a line by itself in order to be properly read > and acted upon by a reader's news client. Thanks, I know. But that's m(y) thing, a double negative makes a +. > -- > dvus I write for human eyes, SW news clients just block way to get there. -- Mahipal "IPMM, word games are not just a PunIshMent! O weight..."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-31 17:14 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <d9kp8rFt1rlU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #529448 |
On 10/31/2015 2:13 PM, Mahipal wrote: > On Saturday, October 31, 2015 at 7:19:36 AM UTC-4, dvus wrote: >> On 10/30/2015 10:22 AM, Mahipal wrote: >>> On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 7:20:30 AM UTC-4, dvus wrote: >>>> On 10/29/2015 5:52 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 15:49:37 -0500, Sam Wormley wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> we should >>>>>> contribute back to the community [with an Apple product] >>>> >>>> It's bad form to post-edit other people's words, especially with >>>> commercial endorsements. >>> >>> That is a major hurdle to deal with one, of many, Usenet's >>> failings. Nobody else should be allowed to edit any post they are >>> responding to. Nobody's, not even one's own post should be alterable. >> >> We all post subject to our provider's TOS. Beyond that, unless posting >> in a moderated group, Usenet is self-policing. Often, bringing >> unacceptable behavior to a poster's attention is all that's needed. > > Policing? Like in Police? I'm not allowed to write about any Police. Wot? Ah, in perusing the balance of your rambling remarks I have come to the unavoidable conclusion that you must be a kook. You answer unasked questions with "facts" not relevant to any of the discussion. >>>>> Ha, ha, ha, ha! I knew that the responses to this would include both >>>>> pro and con. Some will agree and some will disagree. How wonderfully >>>>> libertarian. >>>> >>>> ...and wonderfully Usenettian, to coin a word. Everyone is free to post >>>> what they will in an unmoderated forum like s.p. >>> >>> https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=Usenettian, so fairly new word. >>> However, you can search for "Usenetian" or "Usenet Ian" getting many results. >> >> Just proves that great minds think alike. > > Or just can't type. Great minds have names, not mere self-praising ego. Call the police! Someone stole your sense of humor. >>>>> The sad truth, however, is that a discussion group is not the place >>>>> for news aggregation (if you want it there is plenty of cheap software >>>>> for it). Furthermore, the aggregation of debased, puerile, and sophomoric >>>>> science news is especially inappropriate. >>>> >>>> Sounds like you'd like to moderate the posts in here according to what >>>> you believe is appropriate. >>> >>> More likely Fabian would like to raise the quality of discussions. >> >> Then he should post quality material instead of telling others what they >> should or should not post. > > Fabian's quality of discussion in only a few posts has already > surpassed the quality of any content Sam Wormley (SW) has provided -- > combined, cummulative, cut&repasted -- ever since his first post like > 54321+ posts ago. What are you dvus, SW's algorithm handler/provider? Your veering into kookdom here. Straighten out. >>> Unmoderated NGs have always been quality controlled by their >>> community. Sam would do well to start his own moderated NG. >> >> Why? The group in its present form seems to be working fine. If there >> are those who wish to form a moderated group there's a process for that. > > The group is working just fine?! This NG is fine? You have your own > set of definitions for words, I presume, too. All we get to do is try > to get misanthrope Sam to STFU. Tell Sam's handlers to pull his and > their own psychotic plug. Trust me, I'm being very Very VERY polite. But you're not making any sense! Polite nonsense is still nonsense. >>>>> Discussion involves a sincere and freeform inquiry as well as a spontaneous >>>>> and unstructured exchange. The prepackaged jabber of popular journalists >>>>> does not qualify. >>> >>> I like that. All, however popular, journalism has always been about >>> product placement or advertising specific institutions or promoting >>> short-listed peer-reviewed approved authors. The prepackaged jabber >>> just leads to dull and boring same-old homogenous literature. iApple! >>> >>>> Yet it sounds like you'd like to structure the postings according to >>>> what you believe qualifies. >>> >>> Nettiquete. Read all about it. Did I make a typo? Again... darn. >>> https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=Nettiquete >> >> I'm not a member of the grammar police so don't expect me to correct (or >> point out) yours. As long as I can extract the gist of your remarks I'm >> good to go. > > Spelling in science groups is rather a minor complaint given that the > vast majority of scientists are actually foreign to the English > language. Hell, I've been in crowded physics and engineering graduate > classes, as many as five students huddled together, like in any > no-brains@all TV_SITCOM (i.e., TBBT and every other sitcom else) > ... even the professors are English Pronunciation Challenged (EPC). > > If you want a career in Miss Spelling, go into Marketing, YouAssOfA@#. You appear to have a comprehension problem. I indicated I didn't care about grammar or spelling mistakes and you proceed to call me names over supposed spelling lames I didn't make. What's wrong with you? >> That said, it seems you feel Wormley has committed a breach of >> Netiquette by posting excerpts from scientific sources in a scientific >> newsgroup. I don't agree, but that's the beauty of Usenet. We get to >> disagree without worrying the Usenet police will come for us in the >> middle of the night! > > More police? You should know I helped engineer police tech, from their > guns, cars, lasers, body cameras, heat, coffee, donuts, databases > E-ZPass or BigDataBrother of WhatSoFuckYouEver@# fame, their over > weightness, bad haircuts, bald females, their macho high school > dropout sadistic attitudes, pathetic uniformed storm trooper looks, > their we are not of the people demeanor... o shit... traffic cop on my > ass again. I knew I should've got my tail and its light fixed. Damn > damn DAMN! What's my skin tone today, now?! Damn damn DMAN Squared! > It's been real folks. Bye bye BYE. I've to run to get shot now. I really don't care about your law enforcement career nor your apparent dislike for the police. That's filed under personal problems, please keep them personal. >>>> If a poster's contributions don't measure up to your standards you can >>>> always kill-file him or her. >>> >>> I notice you dvus are very new to Usenet, like only four posts. Why? >> >> Heh, you notice wrongly. But that's not important, on Usenet even >> beginners are welcome. > > Your doublespeak indicates you are no newborn to Usenet. How nice. Double-speak? PKB my friend. > I rely on the digital technology that tracks every keystroke ever > submitted to the WWW, of which Usenet is a mere subset. If said SW > tech is wrong, in error, which it very well could be since all the > development work is outsourced to ...youKnow, while all the real > brainy talent remains unemployed in WestVA, so... give me links to > your subject matter history. Or, better still, retype every word you > ever had the chance to write. Word for word, by Tuesday. Tia. Since the demise of Deja News I wonder where you're getting this complete archive of Usenet postings. My understanding is that Google Groups is far from complete in this area. >>> Killfiles are rather a bad idea, in retrospect. Would you not want to >>> correct abusive posters/trolls that would and do spread falsehoods >>> about other people on Usenet? Anonymized Nym-shifting psychotic >>> behaviour ought be prevented from happening. Repeated, routinely, >>> deliberately editing others' content; effectively attributing words to >>> someone else who never wrote them, is another major Usenet weakness. >> >> I have no desire to prevent anyone from saying anything. If I don't like >> something someone posts I'll say so, but I'll defend to the end their >> right to post what they wish in an unmoderated group. Remember, group >> names and even charters of unmoderated groups are merely advisory. If >> someone doesn't like reading an author's words he can kill-file him. > > You're infatuation with kill-files is strong. Are you in many of them? None I know of. You're welcome to add me to yours, though. > Or... would you==dvus care to publicize your own never-ending killfile? > Ftr, anybody who has posted their kill-file lists, only amounted to a > forgetful pile of heaping stinking this ...youKnow. I would, but I don't have a kill-file. I'm capable of ignoring people without one. > Moral: If all you got from Usenet is killfiles, then you really > ought go someplace else and find a worth your while hobby. See above. > Conundrum: Why do posters crap on Usenet to land in killfiles? Oye. > > Lesson: You may waste your own life's time, don't waste others'. If I'm wasting your time just move on to the next post. >>> Usenet NNTP servers end up propagating Sam's count of unwelcomed >>> bits. Perhaps bits are still not cheap for all those download NGs. >>> For part of 2015 alone, here's Sam's count of posts: >>> Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct >>> 283 890 618 602 607 >>> >>> Sam must be the most well read human on Earth, discussing ||0||! >> >> Good for him! If I didn't like what he posted I'd simply make sure I >> never saw it again. As it happens, I peruse everything he posts. It's >> unfortunate I have to also read the cut-n-paste replies of that other >> whiner, but that's Usenet for you. You take the good with the bad. > > Jim Pennino is allowed to cut and paste his own words/writings. Duh. Sure. I don't have to agree with his whinings, though. Yours either, for that matter. >>> If Sam, or anyone, displayed his kind of behaviour in a physical >>> discussion room, he would be hauled out of the building. Period. >> >> Have you considered that if there were rules against what he posts he >> might not do it? Since there isn't there's no reason for him not to. > > Yes, I have. Also, my motto too is 'Rules? There Are No Rules!' Well, there are some, they're in your providers TOS. Ignore them at your own peril. >>> Sam Worm Lie hounds this NG like there's no consequence of having a >>> posting history. Sam claims that jimp waits for his daily cut and >>> pastes. Seriously? Who in hell needs to wait?! What wait? Oye. >> >> Heh, nice ad hominem there. AFAIC, whether jimp waits or not is irrelevant. > > Whether Sam writes that Jim Pennino waits is relevant. If I wanted > just to hear people call eachother ad hominem insults, I would've > stayed married. Your wife used to call you names? I can't imagine why... >>> Sam Wormley, the greatest hypocrite in this NG, of all time, projects >>> he is providing a service by hogging all bandwidth without more than a >>> single word of 'discussion' or his always poorly written one sentence >>> responses. Sam is the psychology experiment of Unmoderated Gone Mad. >> >> You're accusing Wormley of violating rules that don't exist. That's not >> nice! > > I measurably do not complain that much about spellings or grammar. If > my teachers/professors who grade me for my potentially marketable Yawn > Career@#, then I will desperately bitch: How in Hell is Sam a Professor?! Ask Sam if you're that interested. Why the straw man about spelling lames? >>> There are only a handful of readers and posters on any given NG. Sam >>> bombarding them with copyright violating posts demonstrates a severe >>> misunderstanding of the Usenet Charter, in any language. It's also >>> very poor marketing. It's not even very good propoganda. Most of all, >>> his contribution is not a discussion. >> >> I'm aware of no rule that states one must include any original content >> in ones posts. If you know of such a rule please cite it. > > Copyright Laws, within USA or WIPO, for one. If you have no original > content, or mere original discussion of other's content, of your own, > then stay the fuck off of your key SEND buttons. Have I forgotten to include original content or is that accusation just a deflection? >>> -- Mahipal "IPMM, wow I get four whole lines for a signature?!" >>> In today's media -- paper or otherwise -- Comedians want for being >>> Journalists while Journalism has become Comedy. Very JCJC or CJCJ... >>> >> BTW, you're using unconventional syntax in your .sig. The "-- " >> delineator should be on a line by itself in order to be properly read >> and acted upon by a reader's news client. > > Thanks, I know. But that's m(y) thing, a double negative makes a +. > >> -- >> dvus > > I write for human eyes, SW news clients just block way to get there. > > -- Mahipal "IPMM, word games are not just a PunIshMent! O weight..." So you use a .sig deliminator that doesn't deliminate? Weird, but it's your choice. -- dvus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-31 16:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <09e4d4e5-4fb8-448e-80ed-24970bee9cf3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #529523 |
On Saturday, October 31, 2015 at 5:14:07 PM UTC-4, dvus wrote: > On 10/31/2015 2:13 PM, Mahipal wrote: > > On Saturday, October 31, 2015 at 7:19:36 AM UTC-4, dvus wrote: > >> On 10/30/2015 10:22 AM, Mahipal wrote: > >>> On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 7:20:30 AM UTC-4, dvus wrote: > >>>> On 10/29/2015 5:52 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 15:49:37 -0500, Sam Wormley wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> we should > >>>>>> contribute back to the community [with an Apple product] > >>>> > >>>> It's bad form to post-edit other people's words, especially with > >>>> commercial endorsements. > >>> > >>> That is a major hurdle to deal with one, of many, Usenet's > >>> failings. Nobody else should be allowed to edit any post they are > >>> responding to. Nobody's, not even one's own post should be alterable. > >> > >> We all post subject to our provider's TOS. Beyond that, unless posting > >> in a moderated group, Usenet is self-policing. Often, bringing > >> unacceptable behavior to a poster's attention is all that's needed. > > > > Policing? Like in Police? I'm not allowed to write about any Police. > > Wot? Ah, in perusing the balance of your rambling remarks I have come to > the unavoidable conclusion that you must be a kook. You answer unasked > questions with "facts" not relevant to any of the discussion. Just a mere kook? Damn, I thought I was doing better. Thanks for gauging. The difference between rambling and prolific is go use real dictionaries. > >>>>> Ha, ha, ha, ha! I knew that the responses to this would include both > >>>>> pro and con. Some will agree and some will disagree. How wonderfully > >>>>> libertarian. > >>>> > >>>> ...and wonderfully Usenettian, to coin a word. Everyone is free to post > >>>> what they will in an unmoderated forum like s.p. > >>> > >>> https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=Usenettian, so fairly new word. > >>> However, you can search for "Usenetian" or "Usenet Ian" getting many results. > >> > >> Just proves that great minds think alike. > > > > Or just can't type. Great minds have names, not mere self-praising ego. > > Call the police! Someone stole your sense of humor. I knew I had one, I just can't remember to where to whom it went. Thief! Please Lucifer, whatever happened to it, do not call the OffiSir Police! > >>>>> The sad truth, however, is that a discussion group is not the place > >>>>> for news aggregation (if you want it there is plenty of cheap software > >>>>> for it). Furthermore, the aggregation of debased, puerile, and sophomoric > >>>>> science news is especially inappropriate. > >>>> > >>>> Sounds like you'd like to moderate the posts in here according to what > >>>> you believe is appropriate. > >>> > >>> More likely Fabian would like to raise the quality of discussions. > >> > >> Then he should post quality material instead of telling others what they > >> should or should not post. > > > > Fabian's quality of discussion in only a few posts has already > > surpassed the quality of any content Sam Wormley (SW) has provided -- > > combined, cummulative, cut&repasted -- ever since his first post like > > 54321+ posts ago. What are you dvus, SW's algorithm handler/provider? > > Your veering into kookdom here. Straighten out. You're, not Your. Just an FYI. I'll allow you a few kind jabs my friend. At least you are human. Choose your words kindly, I am not new to Usenet's childish antics. NFAR: What is new to you, she's already been around the blocks. > >>> Unmoderated NGs have always been quality controlled by their > >>> community. Sam would do well to start his own moderated NG. > >> > >> Why? The group in its present form seems to be working fine. If there > >> are those who wish to form a moderated group there's a process for that. > > > > The group is working just fine?! This NG is fine? You have your own > > set of definitions for words, I presume, too. All we get to do is try > > to get misanthrope Sam to STFU. Tell Sam's handlers to pull his and > > their own psychotic plug. Trust me, I'm being very Very VERY polite. > > But you're not making any sense! Polite nonsense is still nonsense. Cute. Ask your nearest adults to help you read for meaning sometime. Your shortest one-liners may work better on a ADD Tweets Mentality. Need website's link@#? > >>>>> Discussion involves a sincere and freeform inquiry as well as a spontaneous > >>>>> and unstructured exchange. The prepackaged jabber of popular journalists > >>>>> does not qualify. > >>> > >>> I like that. All, however popular, journalism has always been about > >>> product placement or advertising specific institutions or promoting > >>> short-listed peer-reviewed approved authors. The prepackaged jabber > >>> just leads to dull and boring same-old homogenous literature. iApple! > >>> > >>>> Yet it sounds like you'd like to structure the postings according to > >>>> what you believe qualifies. > >>> > >>> Nettiquete. Read all about it. Did I make a typo? Again... darn. > >>> https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=Nettiquete > >> > >> I'm not a member of the grammar police so don't expect me to correct (or > >> point out) yours. As long as I can extract the gist of your remarks I'm > >> good to go. > > > > Spelling in science groups is rather a minor complaint given that the > > vast majority of scientists are actually foreign to the English > > language. Hell, I've been in crowded physics and engineering graduate > > classes, as many as five students huddled together, like in any > > no-brains@all TV_SITCOM (i.e., TBBT and every other sitcom else) > > ... even the professors are English Pronunciation Challenged (EPC). > > > > If you want a career in Miss Spelling, go into Marketing, YouAssOfA@#. > > You appear to have a comprehension problem. I indicated I didn't care > about grammar or spelling mistakes and you proceed to call me names over > supposed spelling lames I didn't make. What's wrong with you? I actually acknowledged your care regards grams of spellings. Read. You are too sensitive. I was making a generalization. Ask your Mom. > >> That said, it seems you feel Wormley has committed a breach of > >> Netiquette by posting excerpts from scientific sources in a scientific > >> newsgroup. I don't agree, but that's the beauty of Usenet. We get to > >> disagree without worrying the Usenet police will come for us in the > >> middle of the night! > > > > More police? You should know I helped engineer police tech, from their > > guns, cars, lasers, body cameras, heat, coffee, donuts, databases > > E-ZPass or BigDataBrother of WhatSoFuckYouEver@# fame, their over > > weightness, bad haircuts, bald females, their macho high school > > dropout sadistic attitudes, pathetic uniformed storm trooper looks, > > their we are not of the people demeanor... o shit... traffic cop on my > > ass again. I knew I should've got my tail and its light fixed. Damn > > damn DAMN! What's my skin tone today, now?! Damn damn DMAN Squared! > > It's been real folks. Bye bye BYE. I've to run to get shot now. > > I really don't care about your law enforcement career nor your apparent > dislike for the police. That's filed under personal problems, please > keep them personal. You failed to see the underlying physics/engineering behind my diatribe. Buy a Mom, your facade of being relevant is fading. > >>>> If a poster's contributions don't measure up to your standards you can > >>>> always kill-file him or her. > >>> > >>> I notice you dvus are very new to Usenet, like only four posts. Why? > >> > >> Heh, you notice wrongly. But that's not important, on Usenet even > >> beginners are welcome. > > > > Your doublespeak indicates you are no newborn to Usenet. How nice. > > Double-speak? PKB my friend. PKB, you are the one with the new latest greatest user handle, not I. > > I rely on the digital technology that tracks every keystroke ever > > submitted to the WWW, of which Usenet is a mere subset. If said SW > > tech is wrong, in error, which it very well could be since all the > > development work is outsourced to ...youKnow, while all the real > > brainy talent remains unemployed in WestVA, so... give me links to > > your subject matter history. Or, better still, retype every word you > > ever had the chance to write. Word for word, by Tuesday. Tia. > > Since the demise of Deja News I wonder where you're getting this > complete archive of Usenet postings. My understanding is that Google > Groups is far from complete in this area. Deja News is not new news to me. Been there, done that. Is Google Groups incomplete? Perhaps. Per my searches, and ALPHABET is recording them all, of something I might have discussed with say Ed Green, say it, on Usenet twenty years ago, ..., I'm quite impressed. Thanks Goog! > >>> Killfiles are rather a bad idea, in retrospect. Would you not want to > >>> correct abusive posters/trolls that would and do spread falsehoods > >>> about other people on Usenet? Anonymized Nym-shifting psychotic > >>> behaviour ought be prevented from happening. Repeated, routinely, > >>> deliberately editing others' content; effectively attributing words to > >>> someone else who never wrote them, is another major Usenet weakness. > >> > >> I have no desire to prevent anyone from saying anything. If I don't like > >> something someone posts I'll say so, but I'll defend to the end their > >> right to post what they wish in an unmoderated group. Remember, group > >> names and even charters of unmoderated groups are merely advisory. If > >> someone doesn't like reading an author's words he can kill-file him. > > > > You're infatuation with kill-files is strong. Are you in many of them? > > None I know of. You're welcome to add me to yours, though. I have no kill-file, for all the reasons I stated and implied. Having difficulty understanding the words written before your very eyes? Why? > > Or... would you==dvus care to publicize your own never-ending killfile? > > Ftr, anybody who has posted their kill-file lists, only amounted to a > > forgetful pile of heaping stinking this ...youKnow. > > I would, but I don't have a kill-file. I'm capable of ignoring people > without one. Ignorance is Bliss. > > Moral: If all you got from Usenet is killfiles, then you really > > ought go someplace else and find a worth your while hobby. > > See above. Your reruns? Make them more real, more interesting. One-liners? No. > > Conundrum: Why do posters crap on Usenet to land in killfiles? Oye. > > > > Lesson: You may waste your own life's time, don't waste others'. > > If I'm wasting your time just move on to the next post. A bit too sensitive you are. I made no personal attack at you/anyone. > >>> Usenet NNTP servers end up propagating Sam's count of unwelcomed > >>> bits. Perhaps bits are still not cheap for all those download NGs. > >>> For part of 2015 alone, here's Sam's count of posts: > >>> Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct > >>> 283 890 618 602 607 > >>> > >>> Sam must be the most well read human on Earth, discussing ||0||! > >> > >> Good for him! If I didn't like what he posted I'd simply make sure I > >> never saw it again. As it happens, I peruse everything he posts. It's > >> unfortunate I have to also read the cut-n-paste replies of that other > >> whiner, but that's Usenet for you. You take the good with the bad. > > > > Jim Pennino is allowed to cut and paste his own words/writings. Duh. > > Sure. I don't have to agree with his whinings, though. Yours either, for > that matter. You made that clear a long long time ago. Do you forget what you say? > >>> If Sam, or anyone, displayed his kind of behaviour in a physical > >>> discussion room, he would be hauled out of the building. Period. > >> > >> Have you considered that if there were rules against what he posts he > >> might not do it? Since there isn't there's no reason for him not to. > > > > Yes, I have. Also, my motto too is 'Rules? There Are No Rules!' > > Well, there are some, they're in your providers TOS. Ignore them at your > own peril. Kill-files and TOS of IPs, The Providers? Hi Corporate Earth, USA, Kansas! I think you dvus are way more afraid of TOSs than I Mahipal could ever be. > >>> Sam Worm Lie hounds this NG like there's no consequence of having a > >>> posting history. Sam claims that jimp waits for his daily cut and > >>> pastes. Seriously? Who in hell needs to wait?! What wait? Oye. > >> > >> Heh, nice ad hominem there. AFAIC, whether jimp waits or not is irrelevant. > > > > Whether Sam writes that Jim Pennino waits is relevant. If I wanted > > just to hear people call eachother ad hominem insults, I would've > > stayed married. > > Your wife used to call you names? I can't imagine why... Hey, I watch a lot of Cheers reruns, as I mature, now I know why. Norm! > >>> Sam Wormley, the greatest hypocrite in this NG, of all time, projects > >>> he is providing a service by hogging all bandwidth without more than a > >>> single word of 'discussion' or his always poorly written one sentence > >>> responses. Sam is the psychology experiment of Unmoderated Gone Mad. > >> > >> You're accusing Wormley of violating rules that don't exist. That's not > >> nice! > > > > I measurably do not complain that much about spellings or grammar. If > > my teachers/professors who grade me for my potentially marketable Yawn > > Career@#, then I will desperately bitch: How in Hell is Sam a Professor?! > > Ask Sam if you're that interested. Why the straw man about spelling lames? My bad, I segued off on a tangent there. Mea Culpa. Threads convolute. Threads, they merge, they bind, they coalesce, and then... Then ... THEN... the force awakens and sells popcorn. Regardless... I thought this thread was Sam's by its initiation. Do you==dvus read Usenet with your comprehension switch set to off? Sam only thanks or responds to those asswipes that kiss his... Ergo, you can gauge Sam by whom he does respond to. Hi Worm! > >>> There are only a handful of readers and posters on any given NG. Sam > >>> bombarding them with copyright violating posts demonstrates a severe > >>> misunderstanding of the Usenet Charter, in any language. It's also > >>> very poor marketing. It's not even very good propoganda. Most of all, > >>> his contribution is not a discussion. > >> > >> I'm aware of no rule that states one must include any original content > >> in ones posts. If you know of such a rule please cite it. > > > > Copyright Laws, within USA or WIPO, for one. If you have no original > > content, or mere original discussion of other's content, of your own, > > then stay the fuck off of your key SEND buttons. > > Have I forgotten to include original content or is that accusation just > a deflection? Wake up dvus! Where did I accuse of such behaviour? Nowhere. I may have suggested you're one of many Sam's Handlers/Providers, who else would defend their pet?, something you have not denied btw. Are you? > >>> -- Mahipal "IPMM, wow I get four whole lines for a signature?!" > >>> In today's media -- paper or otherwise -- Comedians want for being > >>> Journalists while Journalism has become Comedy. Very JCJC or CJCJ... > >>> > >> BTW, you're using unconventional syntax in your .sig. The "-- " > >> delineator should be on a line by itself in order to be properly read > >> and acted upon by a reader's news client. > > > > Thanks, I know. But that's m(y) thing, a double negative makes a +. > > > >> -- > >> dvus > > > > I write for human eyes, SW news clients just block way to get there. > > > > -- Mahipal "IPMM, word games are not just a PunIshMent! O weight..." > > So you use a .sig deliminator that doesn't deliminate? Weird, but it's > your choice. What? That doesn't even matter. You follow rules to the dotted I? I make mistakes. I got married, for one. Physics interest, for two. Then... then... THEN... how much time you got? > -- > dvus Simple question: What does your Mom call you dvus? She only SMS texts? -- Mahipal 'Cheers! Five cents a beer?! Here's a Fiver, give me...'
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | xxein1@att.net |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-31 18:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <22fb4d55-aa99-4e98-9b5e-5a05acadcf6d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #529558 |
On Saturday, October 31, 2015 at 7:28:05 PM UTC-4, Mahipal wrote: > On Saturday, October 31, 2015 at 5:14:07 PM UTC-4, dvus wrote: > > On 10/31/2015 2:13 PM, Mahipal wrote: > > > On Saturday, October 31, 2015 at 7:19:36 AM UTC-4, dvus wrote: > > >> On 10/30/2015 10:22 AM, Mahipal wrote: > > >>> On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 7:20:30 AM UTC-4, dvus wrote: > > >>>> On 10/29/2015 5:52 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: > > >>>>> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 15:49:37 -0500, Sam Wormley wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> we should > > >>>>>> contribute back to the community [with an Apple product] > > >>>> > > >>>> It's bad form to post-edit other people's words, especially with > > >>>> commercial endorsements. > > >>> > > >>> That is a major hurdle to deal with one, of many, Usenet's > > >>> failings. Nobody else should be allowed to edit any post they are > > >>> responding to. Nobody's, not even one's own post should be alterable. > > >> > > >> We all post subject to our provider's TOS. Beyond that, unless posting > > >> in a moderated group, Usenet is self-policing. Often, bringing > > >> unacceptable behavior to a poster's attention is all that's needed. > > > > > > Policing? Like in Police? I'm not allowed to write about any Police. > > > > Wot? Ah, in perusing the balance of your rambling remarks I have come to > > the unavoidable conclusion that you must be a kook. You answer unasked > > questions with "facts" not relevant to any of the discussion. > > Just a mere kook? Damn, I thought I was doing better. Thanks for gauging. > > The difference between rambling and prolific is go use real dictionaries. > > > >>>>> Ha, ha, ha, ha! I knew that the responses to this would include both > > >>>>> pro and con. Some will agree and some will disagree. How wonderfully > > >>>>> libertarian. > > >>>> > > >>>> ...and wonderfully Usenettian, to coin a word. Everyone is free to post > > >>>> what they will in an unmoderated forum like s.p. > > >>> > > >>> https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=Usenettian, so fairly new word. > > >>> However, you can search for "Usenetian" or "Usenet Ian" getting many results. > > >> > > >> Just proves that great minds think alike. > > > > > > Or just can't type. Great minds have names, not mere self-praising ego. > > > > Call the police! Someone stole your sense of humor. > > I knew I had one, I just can't remember to where to whom it went. Thief! > Please Lucifer, whatever happened to it, do not call the OffiSir Police! > > > >>>>> The sad truth, however, is that a discussion group is not the place > > >>>>> for news aggregation (if you want it there is plenty of cheap software > > >>>>> for it). Furthermore, the aggregation of debased, puerile, and sophomoric > > >>>>> science news is especially inappropriate. > > >>>> > > >>>> Sounds like you'd like to moderate the posts in here according to what > > >>>> you believe is appropriate. > > >>> > > >>> More likely Fabian would like to raise the quality of discussions. > > >> > > >> Then he should post quality material instead of telling others what they > > >> should or should not post. > > > > > > Fabian's quality of discussion in only a few posts has already > > > surpassed the quality of any content Sam Wormley (SW) has provided -- > > > combined, cummulative, cut&repasted -- ever since his first post like > > > 54321+ posts ago. What are you dvus, SW's algorithm handler/provider? > > > > Your veering into kookdom here. Straighten out. > > You're, not Your. Just an FYI. > > I'll allow you a few kind jabs my friend. At least you are human. > Choose your words kindly, I am not new to Usenet's childish antics. > NFAR: What is new to you, she's already been around the blocks. > > > >>> Unmoderated NGs have always been quality controlled by their > > >>> community. Sam would do well to start his own moderated NG. > > >> > > >> Why? The group in its present form seems to be working fine. If there > > >> are those who wish to form a moderated group there's a process for that. > > > > > > The group is working just fine?! This NG is fine? You have your own > > > set of definitions for words, I presume, too. All we get to do is try > > > to get misanthrope Sam to STFU. Tell Sam's handlers to pull his and > > > their own psychotic plug. Trust me, I'm being very Very VERY polite. > > > > But you're not making any sense! Polite nonsense is still nonsense. > > Cute. Ask your nearest adults to help you read for meaning sometime. > Your shortest one-liners may work better on a ADD Tweets Mentality. > Need website's link@#? > > > >>>>> Discussion involves a sincere and freeform inquiry as well as a spontaneous > > >>>>> and unstructured exchange. The prepackaged jabber of popular journalists > > >>>>> does not qualify. > > >>> > > >>> I like that. All, however popular, journalism has always been about > > >>> product placement or advertising specific institutions or promoting > > >>> short-listed peer-reviewed approved authors. The prepackaged jabber > > >>> just leads to dull and boring same-old homogenous literature. iApple! > > >>> > > >>>> Yet it sounds like you'd like to structure the postings according to > > >>>> what you believe qualifies. > > >>> > > >>> Nettiquete. Read all about it. Did I make a typo? Again... darn. > > >>> https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=Nettiquete > > >> > > >> I'm not a member of the grammar police so don't expect me to correct (or > > >> point out) yours. As long as I can extract the gist of your remarks I'm > > >> good to go. > > > > > > Spelling in science groups is rather a minor complaint given that the > > > vast majority of scientists are actually foreign to the English > > > language. Hell, I've been in crowded physics and engineering graduate > > > classes, as many as five students huddled together, like in any > > > no-brains@all TV_SITCOM (i.e., TBBT and every other sitcom else) > > > ... even the professors are English Pronunciation Challenged (EPC). > > > > > > If you want a career in Miss Spelling, go into Marketing, YouAssOfA@#. > > > > You appear to have a comprehension problem. I indicated I didn't care > > about grammar or spelling mistakes and you proceed to call me names over > > supposed spelling lames I didn't make. What's wrong with you? > > I actually acknowledged your care regards grams of spellings. Read. > > You are too sensitive. I was making a generalization. Ask your Mom. > > > >> That said, it seems you feel Wormley has committed a breach of > > >> Netiquette by posting excerpts from scientific sources in a scientific > > >> newsgroup. I don't agree, but that's the beauty of Usenet. We get to > > >> disagree without worrying the Usenet police will come for us in the > > >> middle of the night! > > > > > > More police? You should know I helped engineer police tech, from their > > > guns, cars, lasers, body cameras, heat, coffee, donuts, databases > > > E-ZPass or BigDataBrother of WhatSoFuckYouEver@# fame, their over > > > weightness, bad haircuts, bald females, their macho high school > > > dropout sadistic attitudes, pathetic uniformed storm trooper looks, > > > their we are not of the people demeanor... o shit... traffic cop on my > > > ass again. I knew I should've got my tail and its light fixed. Damn > > > damn DAMN! What's my skin tone today, now?! Damn damn DMAN Squared! > > > It's been real folks. Bye bye BYE. I've to run to get shot now. > > > > I really don't care about your law enforcement career nor your apparent > > dislike for the police. That's filed under personal problems, please > > keep them personal. > > You failed to see the underlying physics/engineering behind my > diatribe. Buy a Mom, your facade of being relevant is fading. > > > >>>> If a poster's contributions don't measure up to your standards you can > > >>>> always kill-file him or her. > > >>> > > >>> I notice you dvus are very new to Usenet, like only four posts. Why? > > >> > > >> Heh, you notice wrongly. But that's not important, on Usenet even > > >> beginners are welcome. > > > > > > Your doublespeak indicates you are no newborn to Usenet. How nice. > > > > Double-speak? PKB my friend. > > PKB, you are the one with the new latest greatest user handle, not I. > > > > I rely on the digital technology that tracks every keystroke ever > > > submitted to the WWW, of which Usenet is a mere subset. If said SW > > > tech is wrong, in error, which it very well could be since all the > > > development work is outsourced to ...youKnow, while all the real > > > brainy talent remains unemployed in WestVA, so... give me links to > > > your subject matter history. Or, better still, retype every word you > > > ever had the chance to write. Word for word, by Tuesday. Tia. > > > > Since the demise of Deja News I wonder where you're getting this > > complete archive of Usenet postings. My understanding is that Google > > Groups is far from complete in this area. > > Deja News is not new news to me. Been there, done that. Is Google > Groups incomplete? Perhaps. Per my searches, and ALPHABET is recording > them all, of something I might have discussed with say Ed Green, say > it, on Usenet twenty years ago, ..., I'm quite impressed. Thanks Goog! > > > >>> Killfiles are rather a bad idea, in retrospect. Would you not want to > > >>> correct abusive posters/trolls that would and do spread falsehoods > > >>> about other people on Usenet? Anonymized Nym-shifting psychotic > > >>> behaviour ought be prevented from happening. Repeated, routinely, > > >>> deliberately editing others' content; effectively attributing words to > > >>> someone else who never wrote them, is another major Usenet weakness. > > >> > > >> I have no desire to prevent anyone from saying anything. If I don't like > > >> something someone posts I'll say so, but I'll defend to the end their > > >> right to post what they wish in an unmoderated group. Remember, group > > >> names and even charters of unmoderated groups are merely advisory. If > > >> someone doesn't like reading an author's words he can kill-file him. > > > > > > You're infatuation with kill-files is strong. Are you in many of them? > > > > None I know of. You're welcome to add me to yours, though. > > I have no kill-file, for all the reasons I stated and implied. Having > difficulty understanding the words written before your very eyes? Why? > > > > Or... would you==dvus care to publicize your own never-ending killfile? > > > Ftr, anybody who has posted their kill-file lists, only amounted to a > > > forgetful pile of heaping stinking this ...youKnow. > > > > I would, but I don't have a kill-file. I'm capable of ignoring people > > without one. > > Ignorance is Bliss. > > > > Moral: If all you got from Usenet is killfiles, then you really > > > ought go someplace else and find a worth your while hobby. > > > > See above. > > Your reruns? Make them more real, more interesting. One-liners? No. > > > > Conundrum: Why do posters crap on Usenet to land in killfiles? Oye. > > > > > > Lesson: You may waste your own life's time, don't waste others'. > > > > If I'm wasting your time just move on to the next post. > > A bit too sensitive you are. I made no personal attack at you/anyone. > > > >>> Usenet NNTP servers end up propagating Sam's count of unwelcomed > > >>> bits. Perhaps bits are still not cheap for all those download NGs. > > >>> For part of 2015 alone, here's Sam's count of posts: > > >>> Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct > > >>> 283 890 618 602 607 > > >>> > > >>> Sam must be the most well read human on Earth, discussing ||0||! > > >> > > >> Good for him! If I didn't like what he posted I'd simply make sure I > > >> never saw it again. As it happens, I peruse everything he posts. It's > > >> unfortunate I have to also read the cut-n-paste replies of that other > > >> whiner, but that's Usenet for you. You take the good with the bad. > > > > > > Jim Pennino is allowed to cut and paste his own words/writings. Duh. > > > > Sure. I don't have to agree with his whinings, though. Yours either, for > > that matter. > > You made that clear a long long time ago. Do you forget what you say? > > > >>> If Sam, or anyone, displayed his kind of behaviour in a physical > > >>> discussion room, he would be hauled out of the building. Period. > > >> > > >> Have you considered that if there were rules against what he posts he > > >> might not do it? Since there isn't there's no reason for him not to. > > > > > > Yes, I have. Also, my motto too is 'Rules? There Are No Rules!' > > > > Well, there are some, they're in your providers TOS. Ignore them at your > > own peril. > > Kill-files and TOS of IPs, The Providers? Hi Corporate Earth, USA, Kansas! > I think you dvus are way more afraid of TOSs than I Mahipal could ever be. > > > >>> Sam Worm Lie hounds this NG like there's no consequence of having a > > >>> posting history. Sam claims that jimp waits for his daily cut and > > >>> pastes. Seriously? Who in hell needs to wait?! What wait? Oye. > > >> > > >> Heh, nice ad hominem there. AFAIC, whether jimp waits or not is irrelevant. > > > > > > Whether Sam writes that Jim Pennino waits is relevant. If I wanted > > > just to hear people call eachother ad hominem insults, I would've > > > stayed married. > > > > Your wife used to call you names? I can't imagine why... > > Hey, I watch a lot of Cheers reruns, as I mature, now I know why. Norm! > > > >>> Sam Wormley, the greatest hypocrite in this NG, of all time, projects > > >>> he is providing a service by hogging all bandwidth without more than a > > >>> single word of 'discussion' or his always poorly written one sentence > > >>> responses. Sam is the psychology experiment of Unmoderated Gone Mad. > > >> > > >> You're accusing Wormley of violating rules that don't exist. That's not > > >> nice! > > > > > > I measurably do not complain that much about spellings or grammar. If > > > my teachers/professors who grade me for my potentially marketable Yawn > > > Career@#, then I will desperately bitch: How in Hell is Sam a Professor?! > > > > Ask Sam if you're that interested. Why the straw man about spelling lames? > > My bad, I segued off on a tangent there. Mea Culpa. Threads > convolute. Threads, they merge, they bind, they coalesce, and > then... Then ... THEN... the force awakens and sells popcorn. > > Regardless... I thought this thread was Sam's by its initiation. > Do you==dvus read Usenet with your comprehension switch set to off? > Sam only thanks or responds to those asswipes that kiss his... > Ergo, you can gauge Sam by whom he does respond to. Hi Worm! > > > >>> There are only a handful of readers and posters on any given NG. Sam > > >>> bombarding them with copyright violating posts demonstrates a severe > > >>> misunderstanding of the Usenet Charter, in any language. It's also > > >>> very poor marketing. It's not even very good propoganda. Most of all, > > >>> his contribution is not a discussion. > > >> > > >> I'm aware of no rule that states one must include any original content > > >> in ones posts. If you know of such a rule please cite it. > > > > > > Copyright Laws, within USA or WIPO, for one. If you have no original > > > content, or mere original discussion of other's content, of your own, > > > then stay the fuck off of your key SEND buttons. > > > > Have I forgotten to include original content or is that accusation just > > a deflection? > > Wake up dvus! Where did I accuse of such behaviour? Nowhere. I may > have suggested you're one of many Sam's Handlers/Providers, who else > would defend their pet?, something you have not denied btw. Are you? > > > >>> -- Mahipal "IPMM, wow I get four whole lines for a signature?!" > > >>> In today's media -- paper or otherwise -- Comedians want for being > > >>> Journalists while Journalism has become Comedy. Very JCJC or CJCJ... > > >>> > > >> BTW, you're using unconventional syntax in your .sig. The "-- " > > >> delineator should be on a line by itself in order to be properly read > > >> and acted upon by a reader's news client. > > > > > > Thanks, I know. But that's m(y) thing, a double negative makes a +. > > > > > >> -- > > >> dvus > > > > > > I write for human eyes, SW news clients just block way to get there. > > > > > > -- Mahipal "IPMM, word games are not just a PunIshMent! O weight..." > > > > So you use a .sig deliminator that doesn't deliminate? Weird, but it's > > your choice. > > What? That doesn't even matter. You follow rules to the dotted I? > > I make mistakes. I got married, for one. Physics interest, for two. > Then... then... THEN... how much time you got? > > > -- > > dvus > > Simple question: What does your Mom call you dvus? She only SMS texts? > > -- Mahipal 'Cheers! Five cents a beer?! Here's a Fiver, give me...' xxein: Huh? (yawn) Did I miss something? What was it? It'll probably be on the test tomorrow, won't it?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-01 01:54 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <9afe9ec1-c5f4-41d0-8fd6-5f214e923913@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #529589 |
On Saturday, October 31, 2015 at 9:20:26 PM UTC-4, xxe...@att.net wrote: [trim] > > -- Mahipal 'Cheers! Five cents a beer?! Here's a Fiver, give me...' > > xxein: Huh? (yawn) Did I miss something? What was it? It'll > probably be on the test tomorrow, won't it? Are you going to count the number of posts+words in this thread to and point out how you wasted all your time having to have read it? Who is forcing you to read freeform unmoderated NGs? Go Hulu yourself instead. Fiver is dollars 5 US currency. Five cents, a nickel. 100 beers. Norm! Seer Fiver is also an foresightful rabbit character in some novel. Given the endless count of novels, making references to any of them, has become a moot exercise in futility. Watership Down, Richard Adams. Need more context? Since I have a few moments to spare from the abyss of what is called my empty life... plus this daylight savings time just gave me an extra free hour of it... Cheers is a Sitcom, a Sitcom is a TV show, but that's not important right now, from the ancient 1980s. Great show, but no M*A*S*H, mind you. Coincidently, The Chambers of Diane, did work on Alan Alda's Hawkeye once. So the plot thickens... small community of intertwined actors... On Cheers, they did many physics jokes. Sadly, more like tragically, Cheers did or did not realize what a joke Physics itself really was/is. But I digress... Yes, you missed something. You missed that you xxEin==Troll think tests matter -- tomorrow, yesterday, or otherwise. Good for you. The essay question will be, not that I can admit being able to predict the unfolding preordained boring future, why do you bother being a Troll with a name like xxEin(st(Ein))? No words count limit need apply. Most teachers prefer to be bored so they can (yawn) sleep. Their fat and psychopathic spouses, of any modern sex, just ain't doing the trick. Fwiw, and for that for your future reference thingy, when you see the user handle being named Mahipal, you are welcome to make a U-turn immediately and read those whom you might actually like. I make many U-turns regards others' content. Sadly, most yawnies Yawnies YAWNIES can't write more than one-liners. So I end up reading their content before my eyes can blink. I hate them, the one-liners, not my eyes. ADD, it's not just for SMS limited tweets anymore. It's spreading, all around Earth, like as if, sound bites was the only means of branding, I mean talking. I do, I mean branding. Darn it, I mean talking. These hands were made for typing (song mode) and I'll be branding all over... -- Mahipal 'Devious, dvious, dvous, dvus... see that? Lose the vowels.' A: Look at me, I too will be peer pressured to write one-liners! B: You'll be sound bitten! Smitten with love in your blue eyes. A: So, does GR predict this daylight savings time and in which units? B: What? Say again. What? F=uN with Newton? What what WHAT?! Say it!!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bobby Enriquez" <invalide@eyample.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-01 06:36 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <n157vt$3qg$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #529660 |
Adios, moron. Everything you post is boring and stupid "Mapihal" wrote in message news:9afe9ec1-c5f4-41d0-8fd6-5f214e923913@googlegroups.com... I am leaving Usenet now and forever a lot A Lot a lot A Lot a lot A LOT a lot
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 3 [1] 2 3 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web