Re: Editorial

From	gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Editorial
Date	2015-10-29 16:21 -0500
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<n0u2lf$stf$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<GuOdnTT0eeT8G6_LnZ2dnUU7-KmdnZ2d@giganews.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 10/29/2015 3:49 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
>
>
>    Some think I post links to news articles from the physics community
>    to add a bit of fresh water to the, otherwise, river of shit, as
>    Uncle Al calls it.
>
>    Some think I'm posting for a psychology class at Iowa State that is
>    accumulating data on poster responses, one poster in particular.
>
>    When I was hired by Iowa State, it was made clear that we should
>    contribute back to the community, the people of Iowa, and to the
>    world, in addition to the teaching and research we did. I have always
>    taken that seriously.
>
>    I was an Associate Scientist and Principal Investigator while at Iowa
>    State. I have taught at the university, community college and adult
>    education levels for at least the last twenty years. And still do in
>    retirement, contributing without pay of any kind.
>
>    I post from the physics communities to educate, stimulate and foster
>    better understanding and discussion. Yes discussion, not name calling.
>
>    As in any population, there is a percentage that suffer from mental
>    illness or obsessive behaviors. Other are here to play games and seek
>    attention. Those that find my posts disgusting or a waste of time
>    should learn to skip, delete or use a kill-file.  It's easy to do.
>
>    What I post is interesting to me and hopefully to others. Good cheer
>    to all.
>
>   -Sam
>
>
>
>
>

here here !
  I'm glad your posting the links,
I don't have much time to look around for articals,
  and many of your posted articals are very interesting state of the art.

I think some responders go for humor in posting replies, which instead 
comes across as flat or too negitive when read, that's just the nature 
of email/posting.

and you are right about adding fresh water, it needs it for sure.
Thanks Sam

Thread

Editorial Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 15:49 -0500
  Re: Editorial gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-10-29 16:21 -0500
  Re: Editorial jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-29 21:24 +0000
    Re: Editorial Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 18:59 -0500
      Re: Editorial jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-30 05:04 +0000
        Re: Editorial Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 08:25 -0500
          Re: Editorial jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-30 16:58 +0000
          Re: Editorial "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 11:14 -0800
  Re: Editorial Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-29 21:52 +0000
    Re: Editorial dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-10-30 07:20 -0400
      Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 07:22 -0700
        Re: Editorial dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-10-31 07:19 -0400
          Re: Editorial Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-31 18:14 +0000
            Re: Editorial dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-10-31 17:15 -0400
          Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 11:13 -0700
            Re: Editorial dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-10-31 17:14 -0400
              Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 16:28 -0700
                Re: Editorial xxein1@att.net - 2015-10-31 18:20 -0700
                Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 01:54 -0800
                Re: Editorial "Bobby Enriquez" <invalide@eyample.com> - 2015-11-01 06:36 -0800
                Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 07:35 -0800
                Re: Editorial "Mike Smith" <invalidd@example.com> - 2015-11-01 09:06 -0800
                Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 09:32 -0800
                Re: Editorial "Hank Hill" <invalidd@example.com> - 2015-11-01 11:03 -0800
                Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 11:25 -0800
                Re: Editorial gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-01 23:18 -0600
                Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 04:02 -0800
                Re: Editorial gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-02 08:41 -0600
                Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 07:34 -0800
                Re: Editorial "Maple Hall" <invalud@example.com> - 2015-11-02 07:01 -0800
                Re: Editorial dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-01 10:36 -0500
                Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 07:55 -0800
  Re: Editorial Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2015-10-30 11:32 -0400
  Re: Editorial "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 13:18 -0700
    Re: Editorial jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-30 20:36 +0000
    Re: Editorial pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-10-30 15:18 -0700
      Re: Editorial "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 23:16 -0700
        Re: Editorial dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-10-31 07:42 -0400
        Re: Editorial Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 18:54 -0500
  Re: Editorial Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 18:51 -0500
  Re: Editorial David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> - 2015-11-01 18:59 -0500
    Re: Editorial Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 19:32 -0600
      Re: Editorial benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 01:06 -0500

csiph-web