Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #529081

Re: Editorial

From jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Editorial
Date 2015-10-30 05:04 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <7babgc-los.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References <GuOdnTT0eeT8G6_LnZ2dnUU7-KmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <8dfagc-03q.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <DIqdnRm0rK1oL6_LnZ2dnUU7-W-dnZ2d@giganews.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>   Some think I post links to news articles from the physics community
>   to add a bit of fresh water to the, otherwise, river of shit, as
>   Uncle Al calls it.
> 
>   Some think I'm posting for a psychology class at Iowa State that is
>   accumulating data on poster responses, one poster in particular.
> 
>   When I was hired by Iowa State, it was made clear that we should
>   contribute back to the community, the people of Iowa, and to the
>   world, in addition to the teaching and research we did. I have always
>   taken that seriously.
> 
>   I was an Associate Scientist and Principal Investigator while at Iowa
>   State. I have taught at the university, community college and adult
>   education levels for at least the last twenty years. And still do in
>   retirement, contributing without pay of any kind.
> 
>   I post from the physics communities to educate, stimulate and foster
>   better understanding and discussion. Yes discussion, not name calling.

You, as always, have no discussion in regards to my comments on this post
and mearly repeated the post.

>   As in any population, there is a percentage that suffer from mental
>   illness or obsessive behaviors. Other are here to play games and seek
>   attention. Those that find my posts disgusting or a waste of time
>   should learn to skip, delete or use a kill-file.  It's easy to do.
> 
>   What I post is interesting to me and hopefully to others. Good cheer
>   to all.

Yet you felt the need to defend yourself from criticism and justify
your spamming.


-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Editorial Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 15:49 -0500
  Re: Editorial gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-10-29 16:21 -0500
  Re: Editorial jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-29 21:24 +0000
    Re: Editorial Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 18:59 -0500
      Re: Editorial jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-30 05:04 +0000
        Re: Editorial Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 08:25 -0500
          Re: Editorial jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-30 16:58 +0000
          Re: Editorial "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 11:14 -0800
  Re: Editorial Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-29 21:52 +0000
    Re: Editorial dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-10-30 07:20 -0400
      Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 07:22 -0700
        Re: Editorial dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-10-31 07:19 -0400
          Re: Editorial Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-31 18:14 +0000
            Re: Editorial dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-10-31 17:15 -0400
          Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 11:13 -0700
            Re: Editorial dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-10-31 17:14 -0400
              Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 16:28 -0700
                Re: Editorial xxein1@att.net - 2015-10-31 18:20 -0700
                Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 01:54 -0800
                Re: Editorial "Bobby Enriquez" <invalide@eyample.com> - 2015-11-01 06:36 -0800
                Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 07:35 -0800
                Re: Editorial "Mike Smith" <invalidd@example.com> - 2015-11-01 09:06 -0800
                Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 09:32 -0800
                Re: Editorial "Hank Hill" <invalidd@example.com> - 2015-11-01 11:03 -0800
                Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 11:25 -0800
                Re: Editorial gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-01 23:18 -0600
                Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 04:02 -0800
                Re: Editorial gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-02 08:41 -0600
                Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 07:34 -0800
                Re: Editorial "Maple Hall" <invalud@example.com> - 2015-11-02 07:01 -0800
                Re: Editorial dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-01 10:36 -0500
                Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 07:55 -0800
  Re: Editorial Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2015-10-30 11:32 -0400
  Re: Editorial "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 13:18 -0700
    Re: Editorial jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-30 20:36 +0000
    Re: Editorial pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-10-30 15:18 -0700
      Re: Editorial "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 23:16 -0700
        Re: Editorial dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-10-31 07:42 -0400
        Re: Editorial Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 18:54 -0500
  Re: Editorial Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 18:51 -0500
  Re: Editorial David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> - 2015-11-01 18:59 -0500
    Re: Editorial Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 19:32 -0600
      Re: Editorial benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 01:06 -0500

csiph-web