Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #529109

Re: Editorial

From dvus <dven1@adelphia.net>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Editorial
Date 2015-10-30 07:20 -0400
Message-ID <d9h23nFueotU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <GuOdnTT0eeT8G6_LnZ2dnUU7-KmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <pan.2015.10.29.21.52.47@localhost.localdomain>

Show all headers | View raw


On 10/29/2015 5:52 PM, Fabian Russell wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 15:49:37 -0500, Sam Wormley wrote:
>
>> we should
>> contribute back to the community [with an Apple product]

It's bad form to post-edit other people's words, especially with 
commercial endorsements.

> Ha, ha, ha, ha!  I knew that the responses to this would include both
> pro and con.  Some will agree and some will disagree.  How wonderfully
> libertarian.

...and wonderfully Usenettian, to coin a word. Everyone is free to post 
what they will in an unmoderated forum like s.p.

> The sad truth, however, is that a discussion group is not the place
> for news aggregation (if you want it there is plenty of cheap software
> for it).  Furthermore, the aggregation of debased, puerile, and sophomoric
> science news is especially inappropriate.

Sounds like you'd like to moderate the posts in here according to what 
you believe is appropriate.

> Discussion involves a sincere and freeform inquiry as well as a spontaneous
> and unstructured exchange.  The prepackaged jabber of popular journalists
> does not qualify.

Yet it sounds like you'd like to structure the postings according to 
what you believe qualifies.

If a poster's contributions don't measure up to your standards you can 
always kill-file him or her.

-- 
dvus

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Editorial Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 15:49 -0500
  Re: Editorial gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-10-29 16:21 -0500
  Re: Editorial jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-29 21:24 +0000
    Re: Editorial Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 18:59 -0500
      Re: Editorial jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-30 05:04 +0000
        Re: Editorial Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 08:25 -0500
          Re: Editorial jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-30 16:58 +0000
          Re: Editorial "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 11:14 -0800
  Re: Editorial Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-29 21:52 +0000
    Re: Editorial dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-10-30 07:20 -0400
      Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 07:22 -0700
        Re: Editorial dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-10-31 07:19 -0400
          Re: Editorial Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-31 18:14 +0000
            Re: Editorial dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-10-31 17:15 -0400
          Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 11:13 -0700
            Re: Editorial dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-10-31 17:14 -0400
              Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 16:28 -0700
                Re: Editorial xxein1@att.net - 2015-10-31 18:20 -0700
                Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 01:54 -0800
                Re: Editorial "Bobby Enriquez" <invalide@eyample.com> - 2015-11-01 06:36 -0800
                Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 07:35 -0800
                Re: Editorial "Mike Smith" <invalidd@example.com> - 2015-11-01 09:06 -0800
                Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 09:32 -0800
                Re: Editorial "Hank Hill" <invalidd@example.com> - 2015-11-01 11:03 -0800
                Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 11:25 -0800
                Re: Editorial gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-01 23:18 -0600
                Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 04:02 -0800
                Re: Editorial gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-02 08:41 -0600
                Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 07:34 -0800
                Re: Editorial "Maple Hall" <invalud@example.com> - 2015-11-02 07:01 -0800
                Re: Editorial dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-01 10:36 -0500
                Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 07:55 -0800
  Re: Editorial Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2015-10-30 11:32 -0400
  Re: Editorial "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 13:18 -0700
    Re: Editorial jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-30 20:36 +0000
    Re: Editorial pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-10-30 15:18 -0700
      Re: Editorial "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 23:16 -0700
        Re: Editorial dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-10-31 07:42 -0400
        Re: Editorial Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 18:54 -0500
  Re: Editorial Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 18:51 -0500
  Re: Editorial David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> - 2015-11-01 18:59 -0500
    Re: Editorial Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 19:32 -0600
      Re: Editorial benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 01:06 -0500

csiph-web