Re: Editorial

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Editorial
Date	2015-10-29 21:24 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<8dfagc-03q.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References	<GuOdnTT0eeT8G6_LnZ2dnUU7-KmdnZ2d@giganews.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>   Some think I post links to news articles from the physics community
>   to add a bit of fresh water to the, otherwise, river of shit, as
>   Uncle Al calls it.

You are a major contributor to the river of shit with off topic links,
links to arm waving puff pieces, ancient news presented as recent, and
other such nonsense.

>   Some think I'm posting for a psychology class at Iowa State that is
>   accumulating data on poster responses, one poster in particular.

Nope, you have been at it too long for that.

>   When I was hired by Iowa State, it was made clear that we should
>   contribute back to the community, the people of Iowa, and to the
>   world, in addition to the teaching and research we did. I have always
>   taken that seriously.

Try doing something on your own, i.e. something original instead of
grade school level cut and paste.

>   I was an Associate Scientist and Principal Investigator while at Iowa
>   State. I have taught at the university, community college and adult
>   education levels for at least the last twenty years. And still do in
>   retirement, contributing without pay of any kind.

How selfless of you; spend more time at that and less time cut and pasting
publicly available, off topic crap to a physics discussion group.

>   I post from the physics communities to educate, stimulate and foster
>   better understanding and discussion. Yes discussion, not name calling.

Then why is it you resist discussing anything?

Why is it comments and questions to you get a response of the exact same
cut and paste? 

Is it that you don't understand your own cut and paste links and are
incapable of discussing them?

Why is it in the VERY rare occasion you actually respond to a question
with your own words it is to attempt to either change the topic or put
up a red herring?

>   As in any population, there is a percentage that suffer from mental
>   illness or obsessive behaviors. Other are here to play games and seek
>   attention. Those that find my posts disgusting or a waste of time
>   should learn to skip, delete or use a kill-file.  It's easy to do.

Or you could actually do what you claim to do.

-- 
Jim Pennino

Thread

Editorial Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 15:49 -0500
  Re: Editorial gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-10-29 16:21 -0500
  Re: Editorial jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-29 21:24 +0000
    Re: Editorial Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 18:59 -0500
      Re: Editorial jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-30 05:04 +0000
        Re: Editorial Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 08:25 -0500
          Re: Editorial jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-30 16:58 +0000
          Re: Editorial "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 11:14 -0800
  Re: Editorial Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-29 21:52 +0000
    Re: Editorial dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-10-30 07:20 -0400
      Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 07:22 -0700
        Re: Editorial dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-10-31 07:19 -0400
          Re: Editorial Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-31 18:14 +0000
            Re: Editorial dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-10-31 17:15 -0400
          Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 11:13 -0700
            Re: Editorial dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-10-31 17:14 -0400
              Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 16:28 -0700
                Re: Editorial xxein1@att.net - 2015-10-31 18:20 -0700
                Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 01:54 -0800
                Re: Editorial "Bobby Enriquez" <invalide@eyample.com> - 2015-11-01 06:36 -0800
                Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 07:35 -0800
                Re: Editorial "Mike Smith" <invalidd@example.com> - 2015-11-01 09:06 -0800
                Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 09:32 -0800
                Re: Editorial "Hank Hill" <invalidd@example.com> - 2015-11-01 11:03 -0800
                Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 11:25 -0800
                Re: Editorial gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-01 23:18 -0600
                Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 04:02 -0800
                Re: Editorial gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-02 08:41 -0600
                Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 07:34 -0800
                Re: Editorial "Maple Hall" <invalud@example.com> - 2015-11-02 07:01 -0800
                Re: Editorial dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-01 10:36 -0500
                Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 07:55 -0800
  Re: Editorial Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2015-10-30 11:32 -0400
  Re: Editorial "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 13:18 -0700
    Re: Editorial jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-30 20:36 +0000
    Re: Editorial pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-10-30 15:18 -0700
      Re: Editorial "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 23:16 -0700
        Re: Editorial dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-10-31 07:42 -0400
        Re: Editorial Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 18:54 -0500
  Re: Editorial Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 18:51 -0500
  Re: Editorial David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> - 2015-11-01 18:59 -0500
    Re: Editorial Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 19:32 -0600
      Re: Editorial benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 01:06 -0500

csiph-web