Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #497317 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-06-02 12:16 -0700 |
| Last post | 2015-06-05 16:00 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 201 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-02 12:16 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-02 18:05 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-02 22:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-02 22:52 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-03 06:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-03 10:25 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-05 07:25 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-03 18:16 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-03 03:58 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-03 13:33 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-03 23:48 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-05 15:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-06 03:14 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-06 11:52 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gray <savagegraycork@friends.gsl> - 2015-06-06 12:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-07 09:35 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-07 13:09 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-07 08:42 -0400
For some, "God" is their hero, their aspiration, the dream. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-06-07 07:12 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-07 09:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-07 08:53 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-07 11:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-07 12:50 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-08 01:52 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-08 00:17 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-07 19:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-08 07:29 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-07 09:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-07 21:30 +0200
Besides me, no one here has defined the word "God". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-06-07 07:53 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-03 18:37 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-04 03:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-05 15:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-05 15:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-05 17:47 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-06 11:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-06 20:25 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-07 13:12 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-07 06:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-07 10:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-07 10:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-07 12:52 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-07 22:27 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-08 07:30 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-08 22:44 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-09 15:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-09 23:39 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-09 19:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-10 11:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-11 00:21 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-11 12:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-11 22:51 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-13 12:32 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-13 23:27 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-14 12:18 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-11 21:16 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-10 23:40 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-11 12:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-11 23:09 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-13 12:34 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-11 21:19 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-07 22:22 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-08 07:31 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-08 22:47 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-09 15:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-09 23:42 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-10 11:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-09 00:59 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-09 15:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-10 01:25 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-10 11:24 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-10 18:40 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-11 12:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-11 21:28 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-06-12 04:10 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-12 08:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-12 11:42 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-12 12:05 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-12 19:41 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-13 01:00 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-12 20:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-13 05:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-13 13:49 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-13 14:14 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-13 12:17 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-13 13:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-11 23:35 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-13 13:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-09 23:45 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-09 19:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-10 11:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-11 00:38 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-10 20:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-11 12:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-11 12:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-11 21:36 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-06-12 04:07 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-13 14:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-13 13:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-13 23:47 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-07 09:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-07 22:54 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-06-07 18:10 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-08 07:37 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-08 23:00 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-08 18:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-09 15:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-10 00:00 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-09 20:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-09 15:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-10 00:16 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-10 11:31 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-11 00:49 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-06-08 18:28 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-08 17:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-09 15:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-06-09 17:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-09 17:39 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-10 11:33 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-08 19:11 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-09 15:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-07 18:57 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-07 19:45 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-07 21:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-07 23:16 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-08 23:15 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-08 18:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-08 23:02 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-09 10:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-09 19:40 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-08 07:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-08 07:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-04 11:30 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-04 17:07 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-05 15:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-05 22:28 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-06 11:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-07 13:15 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-07 10:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-07 21:40 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-07 17:35 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-07 17:34 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-07 16:26 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-08 07:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-08 22:38 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-09 15:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-09 23:34 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-10 11:34 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-10 23:28 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-11 12:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-11 21:04 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-06-12 04:40 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-12 22:36 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-06-12 20:45 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-13 14:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-13 23:24 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-08 19:10 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-09 15:21 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-08 13:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-04 18:34 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-04 21:19 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-05 15:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-04 18:35 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-05 15:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-03 10:52 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-03 20:01 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-03 13:32 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-03 23:56 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-03 18:06 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-04 12:53 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-04 11:35 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-05 16:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-05 17:39 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-06 13:26 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-06 04:42 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-06 14:18 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-07 10:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-06 11:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-06 11:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-04 19:53 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-05 13:39 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-05 05:58 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-05 16:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-06-05 17:46 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-05 16:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-05 17:33 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-06 11:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-06 03:45 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-06 12:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-07 13:19 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-07 10:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-07 21:48 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-07 17:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-05 16:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-05 17:34 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-07 10:21 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-05 16:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-05 16:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-05 17:44 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-06 12:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-05 16:00 -0500
Page 5 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 11 Next page →
| From | benj <nobody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-12 20:58 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <1fLex.48179$ol4.35645@fx11.iad> |
| In reply to | #499697 |
On 06/12/2015 07:00 PM, Malte Runz wrote:
> "benj" skrev i meddelelsen news:O5Dex.19737$ZJ.18496@fx16.iad...
>
> (snip)
>
>> Sounds like the perfect description of you fundi atheists. You all just
>> believe without understanding why or examining any evidence. ...
>
> Evidence? What evidence do I need to examine?
None. Fundies need no evidence. Belief is all you need.
>> ... But then Atheism is such a perfect fit to leftist politics that
>> truth...
>
> What truth?
True is what you SAY is true. Nothing else counts.
>> ... or evidence ...
>
> Oh, yes. Always the "evidence". Why isn't blind faith enough for the
> believer any more? Could it have something to do with the fact that
> evidence
> based knowledge brings results that faith can't?
Science is based upon evidence. Obviously science is of no interest to you.
>> has to take a backseat as it always does in politics.
>>
>> Atheism is just one more example of science today succumbing to political
>> control. ...
>
> Give me one specific example of that.
Global warming.
>> ... Comes the revolution when the workers rise up to smash capitalism,
>> atheism will be the state religion of EVERYONE!
>
> You have to bait your trap with something a bit more sophisticated
Trap? A bit paranoid are we? I just repeat what you lefties tell me.
>> Hallelujah.
>
> Way more sophisticated.
So your idea is the better and more "sophisticated" the lies the better
the results? Can't fool all the people all the time!
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\_:/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
\/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-13 05:37 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mlgtg7$crq$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #499733 |
On 6/12/2015 8:58 PM, benj wrote: > >>> Sounds like the perfect description of you fundi atheists. You all just >>> believe without understanding why or examining any evidence. ... >> >> Evidence? What evidence do I need to examine? > > None. Fundies need no evidence. Belief is all you need. *That* is your answer? Weak. > Science is based upon evidence. Obviously science is of no interest to you. Yet here YOU are espousing the reality of ESP, god, and remote viewing. -- Cut off one head, two more shall take its place. HAIL HYDRA! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZcG5UOY224
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <nobody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-13 13:49 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <83_ex.72033$7M3.12773@fx06.iad> |
| In reply to | #499760 |
On 06/13/2015 05:37 AM, HVAC wrote:
> On 6/12/2015 8:58 PM, benj wrote:
>>
>>>> Sounds like the perfect description of you fundi atheists. You all just
>>>> believe without understanding why or examining any evidence. ...
>>>
>>> Evidence? What evidence do I need to examine?
>>
>> None. Fundies need no evidence. Belief is all you need.
>
>
> *That* is your answer? Weak.
>
>
>> Science is based upon evidence. Obviously science is of no interest to
>> you.
>
>
> Yet here YOU are espousing the reality of ESP, god, and remote viewing.
So I am vindicated that science is of no interest to you in that you
only talk about belief in ESP, God, and Remote Viewing, and ghosts, and
mind reading, and astrology! Say Harlow what's your sign? I want to
"evaluate" your personality and future!
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\_:/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
\/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-13 14:14 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mlhrr0$n0n$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #499806 |
On 6/13/2015 1:49 PM, benj wrote: > >> Yet here YOU are espousing the reality of ESP, god, and remote viewing. > > So I am vindicated that science is of no interest to you in that you > only talk about belief in ESP, God, and Remote Viewing, and ghosts, and > mind reading, and astrology! Say Harlow what's your sign? I want to > "evaluate" your personality and future! Ah, the old and time-honored "I know you are but what am I" defense. "But there's no one here to defend, cause it's always ME that you blame in the end" -Treble Charger: Brand New Low -- Cut off one head, two more shall take its place. HAIL HYDRA! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZcG5UOY224
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-13 12:17 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <557c033d$0$23224$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk> |
| In reply to | #499733 |
"benj" skrev i meddelelsen news:1fLex.48179$ol4.35645@fx11.iad... > > On 06/12/2015 07:00 PM, Malte Runz wrote: > > "benj" skrev i meddelelsen news:O5Dex.19737$ZJ.18496@fx16.iad... > > > > (snip) > > > >> Sounds like the perfect description of you fundi atheists. You all just > >> believe without understanding why or examining any evidence. ... > > > > Evidence? What evidence do I need to examine? > > None. ... You say I'm an atheist without first examining evidence. What evidence is there for to examine before I 'become' an atheist? > ... Fundies need no evidence. Belief is all you need. I'm not a 'fundie'. > > >> ... But then Atheism is such a perfect fit to leftist politics that > >> truth... > > > > What truth? > > True is what you SAY is true. Nothing else counts. What have I said is "truth" WRT atheism and politics. You have to be specific to be taken seriously. > > >> ... or evidence ... > > > > Oh, yes. Always the "evidence". Why isn't blind faith enough for the > > believer any more? Could it have something to do with the fact that > > evidence > > based knowledge brings results that faith can't? > > Science is based upon evidence. ... Of course. > ... Obviously science is of no interest to you. And you reach that conclusion because I don't believe in gods and 'spiritual' woo woo? > > >> has to take a backseat as it always does in politics. > >> > >> Atheism is just one more example of science today succumbing to > >> political > >> control. ... > > > > Give me one specific example of that. > > Global warming. What the hell has 'global warming' to do with lack of belief in gods? The scientific consensus is, based on nothing but physical evidence, that the climate is changing on a global scale. Do you disagree? > >> ... Comes the revolution when the workers rise up to smash capitalism, > >> atheism will be the state religion of EVERYONE! > > > > You have to bait your trap with something a bit more sophisticated > > Trap? ... Yes. That's what trolls do. Try to trap people into having an argument by being very blunt and provocative. Your attempt is just plain silly. > ... A bit paranoid are we? ... I know a troll when I see one, and unless they bring something new and original, I won't even bother. > ... I just repeat what you lefties tell me. Now I'm a 'lefty'? This is what I mean. Trolls are a dime a dozen, and you seem to be a very primitive speciment. > > >> Hallelujah. > > > > Way more sophisticated. > > So your idea is the better and more "sophisticated" the lies the better > the results? Can't fool all the people all the time! You never fooled me, troll. -- Malte Runz
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-13 13:44 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ubuonathfl78nhd9f8a17bi6mdh44uaq1h@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #499697 |
On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 01:00:25 +0200, "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: >"benj" skrev i meddelelsen news:O5Dex.19737$ZJ.18496@fx16.iad... > >(snip) > >> Sounds like the perfect description of you fundi atheists. You all just >> believe without understanding why or examining any evidence. ... > >Evidence? What evidence do I need to examine? Creation. Why are you? Where did you come from? Why does gravity draw 2 masses together - why not push? Why do all individual chemical reactions produce the same product? Why, why, why? the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-11 23:35 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <5579ff39$0$23230$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk> |
| In reply to | #499433 |
"duke" skrev i meddelelsen news:uqfjnah193tcbd3vtcner136n1jijvccjr@4ax.com... > > On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 18:40:48 +0200, "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> > wrote: > > >> I didn't "choose not to believe". ... > > >Never said you did. I fully accept that your belief it not a choice. > >Something convinced you that God is real, and that's why you believe. > >Equally is my non-belief not a choice either. > > Then why don't you believe? One book containing ancient myths that have been translated and copied over and over by fallible humans is simply too little to convince me. All the 'knowledge' you claim to have about God, and what he would love if we did and so on, everything stems from interpreting the same words from the one book. No 'new information' can be created that way. (snip) > >There is only the Bible and people who believe the words in the Bible. > >I'm > >not one of them. > > Where is you evidence that it is not true. The Bible? I don't need evidence that it is not true. Do you need evidence to know that Tarzan is not real? (snip) > >> Man came long before a book came. > >And man came long before God did. > > No, not a chance of that. Show me the evidence that it is not true. -- Malte Runz
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-13 13:48 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <0juonalvt27licqk0vtf76h1l588hfrl3k@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #499527 |
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 23:35:57 +0200, "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: >"duke" skrev i meddelelsen >news:uqfjnah193tcbd3vtcner136n1jijvccjr@4ax.com... >> >> On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 18:40:48 +0200, "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> >> wrote: >> >> >> I didn't "choose not to believe". ... >> >> >Never said you did. I fully accept that your belief it not a choice. >> >Something convinced you that God is real, and that's why you believe. >> >Equally is my non-belief not a choice either. >> >> Then why don't you believe? > >One book containing ancient myths Who said it is ancient myth? > that have been translated and copied over >and over by fallible humans is simply too little to convince me. Foolishness. Translation means from one language to another language. >All the 'knowledge' you claim to have about God, and what he would love if >we did and so on, everything stems from interpreting the same words from the >one book. No 'new information' can be created that way. One creation. NO more than one. > >(snip) > > >> >There is only the Bible and people who believe the words in the Bible. >> >I'm >> >not one of them. >> >> Where is you evidence that it is not true. > >The Bible? I don't need evidence that it is not true. Do you need evidence >to know that Tarzan is not real? > >(snip) > >> >> Man came long before a book came. >> >And man came long before God did. >> > >> No, not a chance of that. > >Show me the evidence that it is not true. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-09 23:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ml7tq4$3kd$4@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #499011 |
On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 15:06:13 -0500, duke wrote: > On Tue, 9 Jun 2015 00:59:06 +0200, "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> > wrote: > >>"duke" skrev i meddelelsen >>news:ln2bna50lfa6np1igiia3k51lgb9h0m3k3@4ax.com... >>> >>> On Sun, 7 Jun 2015 22:22:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >On Sun, 07 Jun 2015 13:12:52 +0200, Malte Runz wrote: >>> > >>> >> "Smiler" skrev i meddelelsen >>> >> news:mkvl06$4mi$1@speranza.aioe.org... >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 11:53:54 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >> >>> >> (snip) >>> >> >>> >>> > Atheism is a decision. >>> >>> >>> >>> When did _you_ decide to believe in god? >>> >> >>> >> Show me a person, who says he can decide to believe in something, >>> >> and I'll show you a person who is faking it. >>> >> >>> >> (snip) >>> > >>> >But lying puke _will_ claim he did decide to believe. >>> >>> No, those are atheist wannabe words - decide to believe. > >>You started it when you wrote "Atheism is a decision". > > Of course it is. YOU choose to reject the evidence. > >>What you're saying is 'the atheist decides to not believe'. > > I say "rejects the evidence". > >>You need to make atheists responsible for their lack of belief, it has >>to be a deliberate choice, for you to be able to justify the cruelty of >>eternal torture your god enforces. > > You justify your own eternal fate, I don't do it for you. > >>> When you believe, you believe. > >>True, and when you don't believe, you can't force yourself to believe, >>which I believe was the point Smiler was making. > > And if finding the EVIDENCE unconvincing, you are an agnostic, not an > atheist. Technically it's impossible to be an atheist is evidence > exists. There is NO evidence. It doesn't exist, much like your supposed god character. > ***** > "Paedophilia is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-09 19:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <d32fnap2vca36bpl23bml61qjimtm6qg9b@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #499105 |
On Tue, 9 Jun 2015 23:45:08 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 15:06:13 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Tue, 9 Jun 2015 00:59:06 +0200, "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> >> wrote: >> >>>"duke" skrev i meddelelsen >>>news:ln2bna50lfa6np1igiia3k51lgb9h0m3k3@4ax.com... >>>> >>>> On Sun, 7 Jun 2015 22:22:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >On Sun, 07 Jun 2015 13:12:52 +0200, Malte Runz wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> "Smiler" skrev i meddelelsen >>>> >> news:mkvl06$4mi$1@speranza.aioe.org... >>>> >>> >>>> >>> On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 11:53:54 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> (snip) >>>> >> >>>> >>> > Atheism is a decision. Liar. >>>> >>> When did _you_ decide to believe in god? >>>> >> >>>> >> Show me a person, who says he can decide to believe in something, >>>> >> and I'll show you a person who is faking it. >>>> >> >>>> >> (snip) >>>> > >>>> >But lying puke _will_ claim he did decide to believe. >>>> >>>> No, those are atheist wannabe words - decide to believe. Liar. Twice over. >>>You started it when you wrote "Atheism is a decision". >> >> Of course it is. YOU choose to reject the evidence. Liar. Three times over. >>>What you're saying is 'the atheist decides to not believe'. >> >> I say "rejects the evidence". Liar. Rejects WHAT FUCKING EVIDENCE? Neither the in-your-face, proven serial liar nor any other theist has ever provided any. >>>You need to make atheists responsible for their lack of belief, it has >>>to be a deliberate choice, for you to be able to justify the cruelty of >>>eternal torture your god enforces. He's in such serious denial he can't admit that when one has no reason to believe something, then one doesn't. And that isn't a choice. But it takes a psychopath to believe and defend a psychopathic story. >> You justify your own eternal fate, I don't do it for you. WHAT FUCKING ETERNAL FATE? >>>> When you believe, you believe. >> >>>True, and when you don't believe, you can't force yourself to believe, >>>which I believe was the point Smiler was making. A point we've all had to make to stupid, nasty theists. >> And if finding the EVIDENCE unconvincing, you are an agnostic, not an >> atheist. Technically it's impossible to be an atheist is evidence >> exists. WHAT FUCKING EVIDENCE? Neither he nor any other theist has ever provided any. >There is NO evidence. It doesn't exist, much like your supposed god >character. If there were any, a conversion religion like Christianity would have made sure the whole world knew about it. The usual excuse is free will, but that doesn't seem to be an issue for dishonest apologists all the way from Aquinas to William Lane Craig or any of the other dishonest Christians who claim to have "proved" their religion's god using transparent fallacies. >> ***** >> "Paedophilia is the most perfect form of Prayer." >> Pope Paul VI ***** "Bottoms up"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-10 11:26 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <66pgnat4c7pdecg15uravdc74cvv4g1ton@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #499122 |
On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 19:54:17 -0500, Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >On Tue, 9 Jun 2015 23:45:08 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >wrote: > >>On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 15:06:13 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 9 Jun 2015 00:59:06 +0200, "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>"duke" skrev i meddelelsen >>>>news:ln2bna50lfa6np1igiia3k51lgb9h0m3k3@4ax.com... >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, 7 Jun 2015 22:22:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >On Sun, 07 Jun 2015 13:12:52 +0200, Malte Runz wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> >> "Smiler" skrev i meddelelsen >>>>> >> news:mkvl06$4mi$1@speranza.aioe.org... >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 11:53:54 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> (snip) >>>>> >> >>>>> >>> > Atheism is a decision. > >Liar. > >>>>> >>> When did _you_ decide to believe in god? >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Show me a person, who says he can decide to believe in something, >>>>> >> and I'll show you a person who is faking it. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> (snip) >>>>> > >>>>> >But lying puke _will_ claim he did decide to believe. >>>>> >>>>> No, those are atheist wannabe words - decide to believe. > >Liar. Twice over. > >>>>You started it when you wrote "Atheism is a decision". >>> >>> Of course it is. YOU choose to reject the evidence. > >Liar. Three times over. > >>>>What you're saying is 'the atheist decides to not believe'. >>> >>> I say "rejects the evidence". > >Liar. >Rejects WHAT FUCKING EVIDENCE? Blindness will not be your salvation. God gave us ample opportunity to accept him. You reject the evidence; you pay the price. >Neither the in-your-face, proven serial liar nor any other theist has >ever provided any. >>>>You need to make atheists responsible for their lack of belief, it has >>>>to be a deliberate choice, for you to be able to justify the cruelty of >>>>eternal torture your god enforces. >He's in such serious denial he can't admit that when one has no reason >to believe something, then one doesn't. >And that isn't a choice. 2.2 billion people alive and well today see and accept the evidence. I'm in there. What's your problem? Oh, I know - you know better than God. And so you stand in judgment. > >But it takes a psychopath to believe and defend a psychopathic story. > >>> You justify your own eternal fate, I don't do it for you. > >WHAT FUCKING ETERNAL FATE? > >>>>> When you believe, you believe. >>> >>>>True, and when you don't believe, you can't force yourself to believe, >>>>which I believe was the point Smiler was making. > >A point we've all had to make to stupid, nasty theists. > >>> And if finding the EVIDENCE unconvincing, you are an agnostic, not an >>> atheist. Technically it's impossible to be an atheist is evidence >>> exists. > >WHAT FUCKING EVIDENCE? > >Neither he nor any other theist has ever provided any. > >>There is NO evidence. It doesn't exist, much like your supposed god >>character. > >If there were any, a conversion religion like Christianity would have >made sure the whole world knew about it. > >The usual excuse is free will, but that doesn't seem to be an issue >for dishonest apologists all the way from Aquinas to William Lane >Craig or any of the other dishonest Christians who claim to have >"proved" their religion's god using transparent fallacies. > >>> ***** >>> "Paedophilia is the most perfect form of Prayer." >>> Pope Paul VI ***** > >"Bottoms up" the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-11 00:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mlal9g$c9u$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #499196 |
On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 11:26:59 -0500, duke wrote: > On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 19:54:17 -0500, Christopher A. Lee > <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: > >>On Tue, 9 Jun 2015 23:45:08 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 15:06:13 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 9 Jun 2015 00:59:06 +0200, "Malte Runz" >>>> <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>"duke" skrev i meddelelsen >>>>>news:ln2bna50lfa6np1igiia3k51lgb9h0m3k3@4ax.com... >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, 7 Jun 2015 22:22:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >On Sun, 07 Jun 2015 13:12:52 +0200, Malte Runz wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> >> "Smiler" skrev i meddelelsen >>>>>> >> news:mkvl06$4mi$1@speranza.aioe.org... >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 11:53:54 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> (snip) >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>> > Atheism is a decision. >> >>Liar. >> >>>>>> >>> When did _you_ decide to believe in god? >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Show me a person, who says he can decide to believe in >>>>>> >> something, >>>>>> >> and I'll show you a person who is faking it. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> (snip) >>>>>> > >>>>>> >But lying puke _will_ claim he did decide to believe. >>>>>> >>>>>> No, those are atheist wannabe words - decide to believe. >> >>Liar. Twice over. >> >>>>>You started it when you wrote "Atheism is a decision". >>>> >>>> Of course it is. YOU choose to reject the evidence. >> >>Liar. Three times over. >> >>>>>What you're saying is 'the atheist decides to not believe'. >>>> >>>> I say "rejects the evidence". >> >>Liar. >>Rejects WHAT FUCKING EVIDENCE? > > Blindness will not be your salvation. Puke is drooling again. It's spelt 'Salivation.' > God gave us ample opportunity to > accept him. You reject the evidence; you pay the price. You have NO EVIDENCE, liar puke. >>Neither the in-your-face, proven serial liar nor any other theist has >>ever provided any. > >>>>>You need to make atheists responsible for their lack of belief, it >>>>>has to be a deliberate choice, for you to be able to justify the >>>>>cruelty of eternal torture your god enforces. > >>He's in such serious denial he can't admit that when one has no reason >>to believe something, then one doesn't. >>And that isn't a choice. > > 2.2 billion people alive and well today see and accept the evidence. > I'm in there. What's your problem? Oh, I know - you know better than > God. Everyone's 'better' than a non-existent entity. > And so you stand in judgment. I prefer to sit when judging morons like you. I still, sometimes fall off my chair from laughing too much. >>But it takes a psychopath to believe and defend a psychopathic story. >> >>>> You justify your own eternal fate, I don't do it for you. >> >>WHAT FUCKING ETERNAL FATE? >> >>>>>> When you believe, you believe. >>>> >>>>>True, and when you don't believe, you can't force yourself to >>>>>believe, which I believe was the point Smiler was making. >> >>A point we've all had to make to stupid, nasty theists. >> >>>> And if finding the EVIDENCE unconvincing, you are an agnostic, not an >>>> atheist. Technically it's impossible to be an atheist is evidence >>>> exists. >> >>WHAT FUCKING EVIDENCE? >> >>Neither he nor any other theist has ever provided any. >> >>>There is NO evidence. It doesn't exist, much like your supposed god >>>character. >> >>If there were any, a conversion religion like Christianity would have >>made sure the whole world knew about it. >> >>The usual excuse is free will, but that doesn't seem to be an issue for >>dishonest apologists all the way from Aquinas to William Lane Craig or >>any of the other dishonest Christians who claim to have "proved" their >>religion's god using transparent fallacies. The major fallacy being assuming their conclusion. None can argue from the position that there is no god to conclude that there is one. >>>> ***** >>>> "Paedophilia is the most perfect form of Prayer." >>>> Pope Paul VI ***** >> >>"Bottoms up" > ***** > "Paedophilia is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-10 20:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <88nhnal90h0j19fobht4fj922psb9hllfp@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #499311 |
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 00:38:08 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 11:26:59 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 19:54:17 -0500, Christopher A. Lee >> <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 9 Jun 2015 23:45:08 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>> >>>>On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 15:06:13 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tue, 9 Jun 2015 00:59:06 +0200, "Malte Runz" >>>>> <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>"duke" skrev i meddelelsen >>>>>>news:ln2bna50lfa6np1igiia3k51lgb9h0m3k3@4ax.com... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, 7 Jun 2015 22:22:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >On Sun, 07 Jun 2015 13:12:52 +0200, Malte Runz wrote: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >> "Smiler" skrev i meddelelsen >>>>>>> >> news:mkvl06$4mi$1@speranza.aioe.org... >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 11:53:54 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> (snip) >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >>> > Atheism is a decision. >>> >>>Liar. >>> >>>>>>> >>> When did _you_ decide to believe in god? >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> Show me a person, who says he can decide to believe in >>>>>>> >> something, >>>>>>> >> and I'll show you a person who is faking it. >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> (snip) >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >But lying puke _will_ claim he did decide to believe. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No, those are atheist wannabe words - decide to believe. >>> >>>Liar. Twice over. >>> >>>>>>You started it when you wrote "Atheism is a decision". >>>>> >>>>> Of course it is. YOU choose to reject the evidence. >>> >>>Liar. Three times over. >>> >>>>>>What you're saying is 'the atheist decides to not believe'. >>>>> >>>>> I say "rejects the evidence". >>> >>>Liar. >>>Rejects WHAT FUCKING EVIDENCE? >> >> Blindness will not be your salvation. WHAT FUCKING BLINDNESS AND WHAT FUCKING SALVATION? >Puke is drooling again. It's spelt 'Salivation.' Is it any wonder, we conclude Christians are sociopathic idiots? >> God WHAT FUCKING GOD? >> gave us ample opportunity to >> accept him. Liar. >> You reject the evidence; WHAT FUCKING EVIDENCE was the in-your-face, personally nasty liar lying that I reject? I can't, because none has ever been provided. >> you pay the price. WHAT FUCKING PRICE? >You have NO EVIDENCE, liar puke. No theist ever has, and they are totally incapable of talking outside their religion with people outside it, because they can't get their minds around the idea of their nonsense being merely something somebody else believes, just like Father Christmas, UFO abductions and all the other gods are to them. >>>Neither the in-your-face, proven serial liar nor any other theist has >>>ever provided any. >> >>>>>>You need to make atheists responsible for their lack of belief, it >>>>>>has to be a deliberate choice, for you to be able to justify the >>>>>>cruelty of eternal torture your god enforces. >> >>>He's in such serious denial he can't admit that when one has no reason >>>to believe something, then one doesn't. >>>And that isn't a choice. >> >> 2.2 billion people alive and well today see and accept the evidence. WHAT FUCKING EVIDENCE? >> I'm in there. What's your problem? Oh, I know - you know better than >> God. THAN WHAT FUCKING GOD? >Everyone's 'better' than a non-existent entity. > >> And so you stand in judgment. Liar. >I prefer to sit when judging morons like you. I still, sometimes fall off >my chair from laughing too much. He's not just a moron, he's seriously mentally ill.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-11 12:11 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <i6gjnatq1rasohh6ckunlvkl9e0stibnrl@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #499315 |
On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 20:09:23 -0500, Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >>>>>>>What you're saying is 'the atheist decides to not believe'. >>>>>> I say "rejects the evidence". >>>>Rejects WHAT FUCKING EVIDENCE? >>> Blindness will not be your salvation. >WHAT FUCKING BLINDNESS AND WHAT FUCKING SALVATION? The evidence that we all see. Well, not you. >WHAT FUCKING GOD? >WHAT FUCKING EVIDENCE was the in-your-face, personally nasty liar >lying that I reject? >WHAT FUCKING PRICE? >>> 2.2 billion people alive and well today see and accept the evidence. >WHAT FUCKING EVIDENCE? >THAN WHAT FUCKING GOD? the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-11 12:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pvfjnatpi614u9u65k1mfpgdep9rtomk8o@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #499311 |
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 00:38:08 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 11:26:59 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 19:54:17 -0500, Christopher A. Lee >> <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 9 Jun 2015 23:45:08 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>> >>>>On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 15:06:13 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tue, 9 Jun 2015 00:59:06 +0200, "Malte Runz" >>>>> <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>"duke" skrev i meddelelsen >>>>>>news:ln2bna50lfa6np1igiia3k51lgb9h0m3k3@4ax.com... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, 7 Jun 2015 22:22:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >On Sun, 07 Jun 2015 13:12:52 +0200, Malte Runz wrote: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >> "Smiler" skrev i meddelelsen >>>>>>> >> news:mkvl06$4mi$1@speranza.aioe.org... >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 11:53:54 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> (snip) >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >>> > Atheism is a decision. >>> >>>Liar. >>> >>>>>>> >>> When did _you_ decide to believe in god? >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> Show me a person, who says he can decide to believe in >>>>>>> >> something, >>>>>>> >> and I'll show you a person who is faking it. >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> (snip) >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >But lying puke _will_ claim he did decide to believe. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No, those are atheist wannabe words - decide to believe. >>> >>>Liar. Twice over. >>> >>>>>>You started it when you wrote "Atheism is a decision". >>>>> >>>>> Of course it is. YOU choose to reject the evidence. >>> >>>Liar. Three times over. >>> >>>>>>What you're saying is 'the atheist decides to not believe'. >>>>> >>>>> I say "rejects the evidence". >>> >>>Liar. >>>Rejects WHAT FUCKING EVIDENCE? >> >> Blindness will not be your salvation. > >Puke is drooling again. It's spelt 'Salivation.' Why do you reject the evidence? >> God gave us ample opportunity to >> accept him. You reject the evidence; you pay the price. >You have NO EVIDENCE, liar puke. Of course I do. >>>Neither the in-your-face, proven serial liar nor any other theist has >>>ever provided any. >> >>>>>>You need to make atheists responsible for their lack of belief, it >>>>>>has to be a deliberate choice, for you to be able to justify the >>>>>>cruelty of eternal torture your god enforces. >> >>>He's in such serious denial he can't admit that when one has no reason >>>to believe something, then one doesn't. >>>And that isn't a choice. >> >> 2.2 billion people alive and well today see and accept the evidence. >> I'm in there. What's your problem? Oh, I know - you know better than >> God. >Everyone's 'better' than a non-existent entity. Non-existence is not an issue. God absolutely is. >> And so you stand in judgment. >I prefer to sit when judging morons like you. I still, sometimes fall off >my chair from laughing too much. Yet you can't make any points for your beliefs. >>>WHAT FUCKING ETERNAL FATE? >>>WHAT FUCKING EVIDENCE? >The major fallacy being assuming their conclusion. None can argue from the >position that there is no god to conclude that there is one. I have the evidence. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-11 21:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mlcv0p$nm6$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #499436 |
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 12:09:25 -0500, duke wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 00:38:08 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 11:26:59 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 19:54:17 -0500, Christopher A. Lee >>> <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >>> >>>>On Tue, 9 Jun 2015 23:45:08 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 15:06:13 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, 9 Jun 2015 00:59:06 +0200, "Malte Runz" >>>>>> <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>"duke" skrev i meddelelsen >>>>>>>news:ln2bna50lfa6np1igiia3k51lgb9h0m3k3@4ax.com... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, 7 Jun 2015 22:22:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >On Sun, 07 Jun 2015 13:12:52 +0200, Malte Runz wrote: >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> >> "Smiler" skrev i meddelelsen >>>>>>>> >> news:mkvl06$4mi$1@speranza.aioe.org... >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 11:53:54 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> (snip) >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >>> > Atheism is a decision. >>>> >>>>Liar. >>>> >>>>>>>> >>> When did _you_ decide to believe in god? >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> Show me a person, who says he can decide to believe in >>>>>>>> >> something, >>>>>>>> >> and I'll show you a person who is faking it. >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> (snip) >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> >But lying puke _will_ claim he did decide to believe. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No, those are atheist wannabe words - decide to believe. >>>> >>>>Liar. Twice over. >>>> >>>>>>>You started it when you wrote "Atheism is a decision". >>>>>> >>>>>> Of course it is. YOU choose to reject the evidence. >>>> >>>>Liar. Three times over. >>>> >>>>>>>What you're saying is 'the atheist decides to not believe'. >>>>>> >>>>>> I say "rejects the evidence". >>>> >>>>Liar. >>>>Rejects WHAT FUCKING EVIDENCE? >>> >>> Blindness will not be your salvation. >> >>Puke is drooling again. It's spelt 'Salivation.' > > Why do you reject the evidence? What evidence. You've never provided any. You just tell us what your beliefs are. Beliefs are NOT evidence. >>> God gave us ample opportunity to >>> accept him. You reject the evidence; you pay the price. >>You have NO EVIDENCE, liar puke. > > Of course I do. Then present it, Puke. We don't want your usual unevidenced beliefs. We want real evidence. >>>>Neither the in-your-face, proven serial liar nor any other theist has >>>>ever provided any. >>> >>>>>>>You need to make atheists responsible for their lack of belief, it >>>>>>>has to be a deliberate choice, for you to be able to justify the >>>>>>>cruelty of eternal torture your god enforces. >>> >>>>He's in such serious denial he can't admit that when one has no reason >>>>to believe something, then one doesn't. >>>>And that isn't a choice. >>> >>> 2.2 billion people alive and well today see and accept the evidence. >>> I'm in there. What's your problem? Oh, I know - you know better than >>> God. > >>Everyone's 'better' than a non-existent entity. > > Non-existence is not an issue. God absolutely is. Thanks for the admission that God absolutely is non-existent. >>> And so you stand in judgment. > >>I prefer to sit when judging morons like you. I still, sometimes fall >>off my chair from laughing too much. > > Yet you can't make any points for your beliefs. I have NO beliefs in any god(s). >>>>WHAT FUCKING ETERNAL FATE? >>>>WHAT FUCKING EVIDENCE? > >>The major fallacy being assuming their conclusion. None can argue from >>the position that there is no god to conclude that there is one. > > I have the evidence. No you don't, liar puke, otherwise you would have presented it here instead of your stupid unevidenced beliefs. > ***** > "Paedophilia is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-12 04:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <hlwdjsd2-9C5621.04072112062015@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #499530 |
In article <mlcv0p$nm6$1@speranza.aioe.org>, Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 12:09:25 -0500, duke wrote: > > > On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 00:38:08 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > > > >>On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 11:26:59 -0500, duke wrote: > >> > >>> On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 19:54:17 -0500, Christopher A. Lee > >>> <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: > >>> > >>>>On Tue, 9 Jun 2015 23:45:08 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> > >>>>wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 15:06:13 -0500, duke wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Tue, 9 Jun 2015 00:59:06 +0200, "Malte Runz" > >>>>>> <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>"duke" skrev i meddelelsen > >>>>>>>news:ln2bna50lfa6np1igiia3k51lgb9h0m3k3@4ax.com... > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Sun, 7 Jun 2015 22:22:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> >On Sun, 07 Jun 2015 13:12:52 +0200, Malte Runz wrote: > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> >> "Smiler" skrev i meddelelsen > >>>>>>>> >> news:mkvl06$4mi$1@speranza.aioe.org... > >>>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>>> >>> On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 11:53:54 -0500, duke wrote: > >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> >> (snip) > >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> >>> > Atheism is a decision. > >>>> > >>>>Liar. > >>>> > >>>>>>>> >>> When did _you_ decide to believe in god? > >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> >> Show me a person, who says he can decide to believe in > >>>>>>>> >> something, > >>>>>>>> >> and I'll show you a person who is faking it. > >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> >> (snip) > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> >But lying puke _will_ claim he did decide to believe. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> No, those are atheist wannabe words - decide to believe. > >>>> > >>>>Liar. Twice over. > >>>> > >>>>>>>You started it when you wrote "Atheism is a decision". > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Of course it is. YOU choose to reject the evidence. > >>>> > >>>>Liar. Three times over. > >>>> > >>>>>>>What you're saying is 'the atheist decides to not believe'. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I say "rejects the evidence". > >>>> > >>>>Liar. > >>>>Rejects WHAT FUCKING EVIDENCE? > >>> > >>> Blindness will not be your salvation. > >> > >>Puke is drooling again. It's spelt 'Salivation.' > > > > Why do you reject the evidence? > > What evidence. You've never provided any. You just tell us what your > beliefs are. Beliefs are NOT evidence. > > >>> God gave us ample opportunity to > >>> accept him. You reject the evidence; you pay the price. > >>You have NO EVIDENCE, liar puke. > > > > Of course I do. > > Then present it, Puke. We don't want your usual unevidenced beliefs. We > want real evidence. > > >>>>Neither the in-your-face, proven serial liar nor any other theist has > >>>>ever provided any. > >>> > >>>>>>>You need to make atheists responsible for their lack of belief, it > >>>>>>>has to be a deliberate choice, for you to be able to justify the > >>>>>>>cruelty of eternal torture your god enforces. > >>> > >>>>He's in such serious denial he can't admit that when one has no reason > >>>>to believe something, then one doesn't. > >>>>And that isn't a choice. > >>> > >>> 2.2 billion people alive and well today see and accept the evidence. > >>> I'm in there. What's your problem? Oh, I know - you know better than > >>> God. > > > >>Everyone's 'better' than a non-existent entity. > > > > Non-existence is not an issue. God absolutely is. Poor poor dukie, your credulity is not evidence that your god exists. Why do you think it would be? > Thanks for the admission that God absolutely is non-existent. > > >>> And so you stand in judgment. > > > >>I prefer to sit when judging morons like you. I still, sometimes fall > >>off my chair from laughing too much. > > > > Yet you can't make any points for your beliefs. > > I have NO beliefs in any god(s). > > >>>>WHAT FUCKING ETERNAL FATE? > >>>>WHAT FUCKING EVIDENCE? > > > >>The major fallacy being assuming their conclusion. None can argue from > >>the position that there is no god to conclude that there is one. Which position we don't argue from, so what are you talking about? > > I have the evidence. Poor poor dukie, your credulity is not evidence that your god exists. Why do you think it would be? > No you don't, liar puke, otherwise you would have presented it here > instead of your stupid unevidenced beliefs. -- JD Being open-minded is merely the willingness to consider evidence, not the willingness to accept claims without any.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-13 14:00 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <bavona19dsc65it3fpss086vbf93f8vqeu@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #499587 |
On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 04:07:21 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote: >In article <mlcv0p$nm6$1@speranza.aioe.org>, Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >wrote: > >> On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 12:09:25 -0500, duke wrote: >> >> > On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 00:38:08 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> > >> >>On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 11:26:59 -0500, duke wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 19:54:17 -0500, Christopher A. Lee >> >>> <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>>On Tue, 9 Jun 2015 23:45:08 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >> >>>>wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>>On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 15:06:13 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>>> On Tue, 9 Jun 2015 00:59:06 +0200, "Malte Runz" >> >>>>>> <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> >> >>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>>"duke" skrev i meddelelsen >> >>>>>>>news:ln2bna50lfa6np1igiia3k51lgb9h0m3k3@4ax.com... >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> On Sun, 7 Jun 2015 22:22:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >> >>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >On Sun, 07 Jun 2015 13:12:52 +0200, Malte Runz wrote: >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> >> "Smiler" skrev i meddelelsen >> >>>>>>>> >> news:mkvl06$4mi$1@speranza.aioe.org... >> >>>>>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>> >>> On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 11:53:54 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> (snip) >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >>> > Atheism is a decision. >> >>>> >> >>>>Liar. >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >>> When did _you_ decide to believe in god? >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> Show me a person, who says he can decide to believe in >> >>>>>>>> >> something, >> >>>>>>>> >> and I'll show you a person who is faking it. >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> (snip) >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> >But lying puke _will_ claim he did decide to believe. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> No, those are atheist wannabe words - decide to believe. >> >>>> >> >>>>Liar. Twice over. >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>You started it when you wrote "Atheism is a decision". >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Of course it is. YOU choose to reject the evidence. >> >>>> >> >>>>Liar. Three times over. >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>What you're saying is 'the atheist decides to not believe'. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> I say "rejects the evidence". >> >>>> >> >>>>Liar. >> >>>>Rejects WHAT FUCKING EVIDENCE? >> >>> >> >>> Blindness will not be your salvation. >> >> >> >>Puke is drooling again. It's spelt 'Salivation.' >> > >> > Why do you reject the evidence? >> >> What evidence. You've never provided any. You just tell us what your >> beliefs are. Beliefs are NOT evidence. >> >> >>> God gave us ample opportunity to >> >>> accept him. You reject the evidence; you pay the price. >> >>You have NO EVIDENCE, liar puke. >> > >> > Of course I do. >> >> Then present it, Puke. We don't want your usual unevidenced beliefs. We >> want real evidence. >> >> >>>>Neither the in-your-face, proven serial liar nor any other theist has >> >>>>ever provided any. >> >>> >> >>>>>>>You need to make atheists responsible for their lack of belief, it >> >>>>>>>has to be a deliberate choice, for you to be able to justify the >> >>>>>>>cruelty of eternal torture your god enforces. >> >>> >> >>>>He's in such serious denial he can't admit that when one has no reason >> >>>>to believe something, then one doesn't. >> >>>>And that isn't a choice. >> >>> >> >>> 2.2 billion people alive and well today see and accept the evidence. >> >>> I'm in there. What's your problem? Oh, I know - you know better than >> >>> God. >> > >> >>Everyone's 'better' than a non-existent entity. >> > >> > Non-existence is not an issue. God absolutely is. > >Poor poor dukie, your credulity is not evidence that your god exists. >Why do you think it would be? I'm not depending on my credulity. My faith strongly supported by the evidence can't be challenged. > >> >>>>WHAT FUCKING ETERNAL FATE? >> >>>>WHAT FUCKING EVIDENCE? >> > >> >>The major fallacy being assuming their conclusion. None can argue from >> >>the position that there is no god to conclude that there is one. >Which position we don't argue from, so what are you talking about? You said it, not me. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-13 13:53 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ltuonalk57ajhrf3ha8jlm2qb60h388olr@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #499530 |
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 21:36:25 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 12:09:25 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 00:38:08 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 11:26:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 19:54:17 -0500, Christopher A. Lee >>>> <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Tue, 9 Jun 2015 23:45:08 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 15:06:13 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, 9 Jun 2015 00:59:06 +0200, "Malte Runz" >>>>>>> <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>"duke" skrev i meddelelsen >>>>>>>>news:ln2bna50lfa6np1igiia3k51lgb9h0m3k3@4ax.com... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 7 Jun 2015 22:22:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >On Sun, 07 Jun 2015 13:12:52 +0200, Malte Runz wrote: >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> >> "Smiler" skrev i meddelelsen >>>>>>>>> >> news:mkvl06$4mi$1@speranza.aioe.org... >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> >>> On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 11:53:54 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> (snip) >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >>> > Atheism is a decision. >>>>> >>>>>Liar. >>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>> When did _you_ decide to believe in god? >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> Show me a person, who says he can decide to believe in >>>>>>>>> >> something, >>>>>>>>> >> and I'll show you a person who is faking it. >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> (snip) >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> >But lying puke _will_ claim he did decide to believe. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No, those are atheist wannabe words - decide to believe. >>>>> >>>>>Liar. Twice over. >>>>> >>>>>>>>You started it when you wrote "Atheism is a decision". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Of course it is. YOU choose to reject the evidence. >>>>> >>>>>Liar. Three times over. >>>>> >>>>>>>>What you're saying is 'the atheist decides to not believe'. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I say "rejects the evidence". >>>>> >>>>>Liar. >>>>>Rejects WHAT FUCKING EVIDENCE? >>>> >>>> Blindness will not be your salvation. >>> >>>Puke is drooling again. It's spelt 'Salivation.' >> >> Why do you reject the evidence? > >What evidence. You've never provided any. You just tell us what your >beliefs are. Beliefs are NOT evidence. You got it backwards. Evidence drives beliefs. >>>> God gave us ample opportunity to >>>> accept him. You reject the evidence; you pay the price. >>>You have NO EVIDENCE, liar puke. >> >> Of course I do. > >Then present it, Puke. We don't want your usual unevidenced beliefs. We >want real evidence. Where is your evidence for there being NO creator?. >>>>>Neither the in-your-face, proven serial liar nor any other theist has >>>>>ever provided any. >>>> >>>>>>>>You need to make atheists responsible for their lack of belief, it >>>>>>>>has to be a deliberate choice, for you to be able to justify the >>>>>>>>cruelty of eternal torture your god enforces. >>>> >>>>>He's in such serious denial he can't admit that when one has no reason >>>>>to believe something, then one doesn't. >>>>>And that isn't a choice. >>>> >>>> 2.2 billion people alive and well today see and accept the evidence. >>>> I'm in there. What's your problem? Oh, I know - you know better than >>>> God. >> >>>Everyone's 'better' than a non-existent entity. >> >> Non-existence is not an issue. God absolutely is. > >Thanks for the admission that God absolutely is non-existent. Ju got it backwards. > >>>> And so you stand in judgment. >> >>>I prefer to sit when judging morons like you. I still, sometimes fall >>>off my chair from laughing too much. >> >> Yet you can't make any points for your beliefs. > >I have NO beliefs in any god(s). > >>>>>WHAT FUCKING ETERNAL FATE? >>>>>WHAT FUCKING EVIDENCE? >> >>>The major fallacy being assuming their conclusion. None can argue from >>>the position that there is no god to conclude that there is one. >> >> I have the evidence. > >No you don't, liar puke, otherwise you would have presented it here >instead of your stupid unevidenced beliefs. > >> ***** >> "Paedophilia is the most perfect form of Prayer." >> Pope Paul VI ***** the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-13 23:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mlifet$t93$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #499840 |
On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 13:53:05 -0500, duke wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 21:36:25 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 12:09:25 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 00:38:08 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 11:26:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 19:54:17 -0500, Christopher A. Lee >>>>> <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Tue, 9 Jun 2015 23:45:08 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 15:06:13 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, 9 Jun 2015 00:59:06 +0200, "Malte Runz" >>>>>>>> <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>"duke" skrev i meddelelsen >>>>>>>>>news:ln2bna50lfa6np1igiia3k51lgb9h0m3k3@4ax.com... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 7 Jun 2015 22:22:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >On Sun, 07 Jun 2015 13:12:52 +0200, Malte Runz wrote: >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> >> "Smiler" skrev i meddelelsen >>>>>>>>>> >> news:mkvl06$4mi$1@speranza.aioe.org... >>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>> On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 11:53:54 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> (snip) >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >>> > Atheism is a decision. >>>>>> >>>>>>Liar. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>> When did _you_ decide to believe in god? >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> Show me a person, who says he can decide to believe in >>>>>>>>>> >> something, >>>>>>>>>> >> and I'll show you a person who is faking it. >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> (snip) >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> >But lying puke _will_ claim he did decide to believe. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> No, those are atheist wannabe words - decide to believe. >>>>>> >>>>>>Liar. Twice over. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>You started it when you wrote "Atheism is a decision". >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Of course it is. YOU choose to reject the evidence. >>>>>> >>>>>>Liar. Three times over. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>What you're saying is 'the atheist decides to not believe'. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I say "rejects the evidence". >>>>>> >>>>>>Liar. >>>>>>Rejects WHAT FUCKING EVIDENCE? >>>>> >>>>> Blindness will not be your salvation. >>>> >>>>Puke is drooling again. It's spelt 'Salivation.' >>> >>> Why do you reject the evidence? >> >>What evidence. You've never provided any. You just tell us what your >>beliefs are. Beliefs are NOT evidence. > > You got it backwards. Evidence drives beliefs. Then show us the evidence that drove you to believe. >>>>> God gave us ample opportunity to >>>>> accept him. You reject the evidence; you pay the price. >>>>You have NO EVIDENCE, liar puke. >>> >>> Of course I do. >> >>Then present it, Puke. We don't want your usual unevidenced beliefs. We >>want real evidence. > > Where is your evidence for there being NO creator?. I don't need any evidence not to believe you. >>>>>>Neither the in-your-face, proven serial liar nor any other theist >>>>>>has ever provided any. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>You need to make atheists responsible for their lack of belief, >>>>>>>>>it has to be a deliberate choice, for you to be able to justify >>>>>>>>>the cruelty of eternal torture your god enforces. >>>>> >>>>>>He's in such serious denial he can't admit that when one has no >>>>>>reason to believe something, then one doesn't. >>>>>>And that isn't a choice. >>>>> >>>>> 2.2 billion people alive and well today see and accept the evidence. >>>>> I'm in there. What's your problem? Oh, I know - you know better >>>>> than God. >>> >>>>Everyone's 'better' than a non-existent entity. >>> >>> Non-existence is not an issue. God absolutely is. >> >>Thanks for the admission that God absolutely is non-existent. > > Ju got it backwards. Nope. You got it correct. >>>>> And so you stand in judgment. >>> >>>>I prefer to sit when judging morons like you. I still, sometimes fall >>>>off my chair from laughing too much. >>> >>> Yet you can't make any points for your beliefs. >> >>I have NO beliefs in any god(s). >> >>>>>>WHAT FUCKING ETERNAL FATE? >>>>>>WHAT FUCKING EVIDENCE? >>> >>>>The major fallacy being assuming their conclusion. None can argue from >>>>the position that there is no god to conclude that there is one. >>> >>> I have the evidence. >> >>No you don't, liar puke, otherwise you would have presented it here >>instead of your stupid unevidenced beliefs. Well, where is this supposed evidence that you keep telling us you have? Or are you lying, as usual? >>> ***** >>> "Paedophilia is the most perfect form of Prayer." >>> Pope Paul VI ***** > ***** > "Paedophilia is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web