Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #713102
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.checkmate, sci.physics, alt.fan.cyberchicken |
| Subject | Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... |
| Date | 2018-11-17 14:05 -0600 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <pspsc0$15v1$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <mrnuud1d0hg852qer6qvdfmrc0nlijv6vm@4ax.com> <psnv4a$7lf$1@gioia.aioe.org> <psph2j$ipp$2@gioia.aioe.org> <pspj6e$mgm$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 11/17/2018 11:29 AM, mixed nuts wrote: > On 11/17/2018 11:53 AM, Sergio wrote: >> On 11/16/2018 8:41 PM, mixed nuts wrote: >>> On 11/16/2018 7:32 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>> >>>> I wish kensi were a real astrophysicist. This is my wish because >>>> if she were then she would be qualified to share with us information >>>> and data about the quiescent state of Old Sol as it approaches >>>> an 11-year low in solar activity and how this could be as bad or >>>> worse than the solar minimum called the Maunder Minimum which >>>> caused the recent Mini Ice Age. >>>> >>>> More and more scientific articles are coming out as to the depth >>>> of this current minimum and it appears that it's among the lowest >>>> of lows in recorded history. No sun spots and a quiet solar surface >>>> means way less insolation on the Earth which means a colder Earth. >>>> >>>> How much colder seems to be the question. Rather than the global >>>> warming lie, it would REALLY be good to hear from a real scientist >>>> as to the likely extent of the upcoming mini ice age based upon real >>>> data as to the breadth and depth of this solar minimum. >>> >>> An ass toot smart genius polymath like yourself should already have >>> calculated that a total solar irradiance decrease of 0.25% (the level of >>> the Maunder minimum) would not bring polar bears far enough south that >>> you would need super strong lids on your trash cans. >> >> got URL ? or are you just making stuff up ? > > I read some science papers and estimated the net change in energy > deposition integrated over a half sphere, accounting for albedo, and > compared that to other stuff we know about heat flux and the difference > turns out to be a very small number - barely enough to make a measurable > change in earth surface temperature even over a 100 year time period. > making stuff up. what happens to an 11 year cycle when you average it over 100 years ? http://www-das.uwyo.edu/~geerts/cwx/notes/chap02/sunspots.html
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-16 19:32 -0500
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 17:41 -0700
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 22:25 -0800
sci.physics spammers grading Nobel Laureates as to Global Warming and Real Electron=105MeV, Real Proton=840MeV with .5MeV particle as Dirac's Magnetic Monopole Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 18:35 -0800
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-16 21:41 -0500
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-17 10:53 -0600
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-17 12:29 -0500
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-17 14:05 -0600
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-17 16:57 -0500
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 14:58 -0700
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-17 17:19 -0500
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 15:21 -0700
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-17 17:55 -0500
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 16:09 -0700
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 22:24 -0800
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 11:49 -0600
csiph-web