Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.checkmate > #227177

Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist...

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 11/17/2018 11:53 AM, Sergio wrote:
> On 11/16/2018 8:41 PM, mixed nuts wrote:
>> On 11/16/2018 7:32 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>
>>> I wish kensi were a real astrophysicist. This is my wish because
>>> if she were then she would be qualified to share with us information
>>> and data about the quiescent state of Old Sol as it approaches
>>> an 11-year low in solar activity and how this could be as bad or
>>> worse than the solar minimum called the Maunder Minimum which
>>> caused the recent Mini Ice Age.
>>>
>>> More and more scientific articles are coming out as to the depth
>>> of this current minimum and it appears that it's among the lowest
>>> of lows in recorded history. No sun spots and a quiet solar surface
>>> means way less insolation on the Earth which means a colder Earth.
>>>
>>> How much colder seems to be the question. Rather than the global
>>> warming lie, it would REALLY be good to hear from a real scientist
>>> as to the likely extent of the upcoming mini ice age based upon real
>>> data as to the breadth and depth of this solar minimum.
>>
>> An ass toot smart genius polymath like yourself should already have
>> calculated that a total solar irradiance decrease of 0.25% (the level of
>> the Maunder minimum) would not bring polar bears far enough south that
>> you would need super strong lids on your trash cans.
> 
> got URL ?    or are you just making stuff up ?

I read some science papers and estimated the net change in energy 
deposition integrated over a half sphere, accounting for albedo, and 
compared that to other stuff we know about heat flux and the difference 
turns out to be a very small number - barely enough to make a measurable 
change in earth surface temperature even over a 100 year time period.

-- 
Grizzly H.

Back to alt.checkmate | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-16 19:32 -0500
  Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 17:41 -0700
    Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 22:25 -0800
      Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... "Ms Kitty" <MsKitty@meow.mix> - 2018-11-16 21:54 -0600
        Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-17 18:50 -0500
          Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 16:54 -0700
          Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-17 18:59 -0500
            Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-17 19:14 -0500
              Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-17 19:19 -0500
                Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-17 19:30 -0500
                Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-17 19:33 -0500
                Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 17:45 -0700
          Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 20:28 -0800
            Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-17 20:30 -0500
            Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-18 08:40 -0500
              Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-18 10:51 -0800
                Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-18 11:20 -0500
  Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-16 21:41 -0500
    Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-17 10:53 -0600
      Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-17 12:29 -0500
        Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-17 14:05 -0600
          Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-17 16:57 -0500
            Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 14:58 -0700
              Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-17 17:19 -0500
                Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 15:21 -0700
                Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-17 17:55 -0500
                Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 16:09 -0700
  Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 22:24 -0800
  Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 11:49 -0600

csiph-web