Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist...

From	Sergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Newsgroups	alt.checkmate, sci.physics, alt.fan.cyberchicken
Subject	Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist...
Date	2018-11-17 10:53 -0600
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<psph2j$ipp$2@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<mrnuud1d0hg852qer6qvdfmrc0nlijv6vm@4ax.com> <psnv4a$7lf$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 11/16/2018 8:41 PM, mixed nuts wrote:
> On 11/16/2018 7:32 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>
>> I wish kensi were a real astrophysicist. This is my wish because
>> if she were then she would be qualified to share with us information
>> and data about the quiescent state of Old Sol as it approaches
>> an 11-year low in solar activity and how this could be as bad or
>> worse than the solar minimum called the Maunder Minimum which
>> caused the recent Mini Ice Age.
>>
>> More and more scientific articles are coming out as to the depth
>> of this current minimum and it appears that it's among the lowest
>> of lows in recorded history. No sun spots and a quiet solar surface
>> means way less insolation on the Earth which means a colder Earth.
>>
>> How much colder seems to be the question. Rather than the global
>> warming lie, it would REALLY be good to hear from a real scientist
>> as to the likely extent of the upcoming mini ice age based upon real
>> data as to the breadth and depth of this solar minimum.
> 
> An ass toot smart genius polymath like yourself should already have
> calculated that a total solar irradiance decrease of 0.25% (the level of
> the Maunder minimum) would not bring polar bears far enough south that
> you would need super strong lids on your trash cans.
> 

got URL ?    or are you just making stuff up ?

Thread

Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-16 19:32 -0500
  Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 17:41 -0700
    Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 22:25 -0800
  sci.physics spammers grading Nobel Laureates as to Global Warming and Real Electron=105MeV, Real Proton=840MeV with .5MeV particle as Dirac's Magnetic Monopole Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 18:35 -0800
  Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-16 21:41 -0500
    Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-17 10:53 -0600
      Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-17 12:29 -0500
        Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-17 14:05 -0600
          Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-17 16:57 -0500
            Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 14:58 -0700
              Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-17 17:19 -0500
                Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 15:21 -0700
                Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-17 17:55 -0500
                Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 16:09 -0700
  Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 22:24 -0800
  Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 11:49 -0600

csiph-web