Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #713127

Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist...

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 2018-11-17 3:19 PM, mixed nuts wrote:
> On 11/17/2018 4:58 PM, % wrote:
>> On 2018-11-17 2:57 PM, mixed nuts wrote:
>>> On 11/17/2018 3:05 PM, Sergio wrote:
>>>> On 11/17/2018 11:29 AM, mixed nuts wrote:
>>>>> On 11/17/2018 11:53 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>>> On 11/16/2018 8:41 PM, mixed nuts wrote:
>>>>>>> On 11/16/2018 7:32 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I wish kensi were a real astrophysicist. This is my wish because
>>>>>>>> if she were then she would be qualified to share with us 
>>>>>>>> information
>>>>>>>> and data about the quiescent state of Old Sol as it approaches
>>>>>>>> an 11-year low in solar activity and how this could be as bad or
>>>>>>>> worse than the solar minimum called the Maunder Minimum which
>>>>>>>> caused the recent Mini Ice Age.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> More and more scientific articles are coming out as to the depth
>>>>>>>> of this current minimum and it appears that it's among the lowest
>>>>>>>> of lows in recorded history. No sun spots and a quiet solar surface
>>>>>>>> means way less insolation on the Earth which means a colder Earth.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How much colder seems to be the question. Rather than the global
>>>>>>>> warming lie, it would REALLY be good to hear from a real scientist
>>>>>>>> as to the likely extent of the upcoming mini ice age based upon 
>>>>>>>> real
>>>>>>>> data as to the breadth and depth of this solar minimum.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> An ass toot smart genius polymath like yourself should already have
>>>>>>> calculated that a total solar irradiance decrease of 0.25% (the 
>>>>>>> level of
>>>>>>> the Maunder minimum) would not bring polar bears far enough south 
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> you would need super strong lids on your trash cans.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> got URL ?    or are you just making stuff up ?
>>>>>
>>>>> I read some science papers and estimated the net change in energy
>>>>> deposition integrated over a half sphere, accounting for albedo, and
>>>>> compared that to other stuff we know about heat flux and the 
>>>>> difference
>>>>> turns out to be a very small number - barely enough to make a 
>>>>> measurable
>>>>> change in earth surface temperature even over a 100 year time period.
>>>>
>>>> making stuff up.
>>>>
>>>> what happens to an 11 year cycle when you average it over 100 years ?
>>>
>>> The Maunder Minimum lasted 70 years.  The "Little Ice Age" began 
>>> several years before.  There were also some very warm years during 
>>> that period. The level of solar irradiance is not known with 
>>> certainty but 10Be and 14C records, and geomagnetic storm records, 
>>> indicate decreased solar activity during that time.
>>>
>>> Additionally, fossil pollen is very good proxy for temperature and 
>>> hydrologic conditions.  If you love U. Wyoming researchers very very 
>>> much, look at Bryan Shuman's work:
>>>
>>> https://sites.google.com/site/shumanlab/Home
>>>
>>> He figured out that the earth has been in an extended cooling trend 
>>> but recent anthropogenic carbon inputs have reversed that.
>>>
>>> Sad, innit?
>>>
>>> And very unfair.
>>>
>> it was great for 2 way radio
> 
> I didn't even turn the radio on today.  The clock radio is on in the 
> bedroom but it's not loud enough to hear anywhere else.  I went to the 
> dump and the farm store with the car radio on, but it was all Irish 
> music with no talking.
> 
> So, was there anything going on that got you really excited?
> 
i'm talking about solar flares in the 80's

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-16 19:32 -0500
  Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 17:41 -0700
    Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 22:25 -0800
  sci.physics spammers grading Nobel Laureates as to Global Warming and Real Electron=105MeV, Real Proton=840MeV with .5MeV particle as Dirac's Magnetic Monopole Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 18:35 -0800
  Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-16 21:41 -0500
    Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-17 10:53 -0600
      Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-17 12:29 -0500
        Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-17 14:05 -0600
          Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-17 16:57 -0500
            Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 14:58 -0700
              Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-17 17:19 -0500
                Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 15:21 -0700
                Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-17 17:55 -0500
                Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 16:09 -0700
  Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 22:24 -0800
  Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 11:49 -0600

csiph-web