Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #226915
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.checkmate, sci.physics, alt.fan.cyberchicken |
| Subject | Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... |
| Date | 2018-11-16 21:41 -0500 |
| Organization | here and there |
| Message-ID | <psnv4a$7lf$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <mrnuud1d0hg852qer6qvdfmrc0nlijv6vm@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 11/16/2018 7:32 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > > I wish kensi were a real astrophysicist. This is my wish because > if she were then she would be qualified to share with us information > and data about the quiescent state of Old Sol as it approaches > an 11-year low in solar activity and how this could be as bad or > worse than the solar minimum called the Maunder Minimum which > caused the recent Mini Ice Age. > > More and more scientific articles are coming out as to the depth > of this current minimum and it appears that it's among the lowest > of lows in recorded history. No sun spots and a quiet solar surface > means way less insolation on the Earth which means a colder Earth. > > How much colder seems to be the question. Rather than the global > warming lie, it would REALLY be good to hear from a real scientist > as to the likely extent of the upcoming mini ice age based upon real > data as to the breadth and depth of this solar minimum. An ass toot smart genius polymath like yourself should already have calculated that a total solar irradiance decrease of 0.25% (the level of the Maunder minimum) would not bring polar bears far enough south that you would need super strong lids on your trash cans. -- Grizzly H.
Back to alt.checkmate | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-16 19:32 -0500
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 17:41 -0700
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 22:25 -0800
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... "Ms Kitty" <MsKitty@meow.mix> - 2018-11-16 21:54 -0600
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-17 18:50 -0500
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 16:54 -0700
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-17 18:59 -0500
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-17 19:14 -0500
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-17 19:19 -0500
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-17 19:30 -0500
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-17 19:33 -0500
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 17:45 -0700
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 20:28 -0800
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-17 20:30 -0500
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-18 08:40 -0500
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-18 10:51 -0800
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-18 11:20 -0500
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-16 21:41 -0500
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-17 10:53 -0600
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-17 12:29 -0500
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-17 14:05 -0600
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-17 16:57 -0500
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 14:58 -0700
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-17 17:19 -0500
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 15:21 -0700
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-17 17:55 -0500
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 16:09 -0700
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 22:24 -0800
Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 11:49 -0600
csiph-web