Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: Free electrons versus bound electrons
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 04:01:38 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <nhtvb2$35k$1@pcls7.std.com>
References: <92afb24a-cf1c-49b3-8e6d-3bdd2fa2b491@googlegroups.com> <nhtdpu$d9i$2@pcls7.std.com> <49acbdca-ca12-4d00-9c7e-194e9bc51134@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com
X-Trace: pcls7.std.com 1463976098 3252 192.74.137.71 (23 May 2016 04:01:38 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 04:01:38 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: nn/6.6.5
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:579677

john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>Michael
>Don't the laws of Physics all change
>at the Quantum level?
>According to QM?

QM violates many ideas considered common sense in the macroscopic world,
but the fundamental concepts such as conservation of momentum and so forth
which you gladly violate hold true.

>So am I violating changed laws
>or unchanged laws?
>Brain dead physicists.

Your feeble justification of "if they can do it, so can I" has been noted,
and laughed at. [especially since "they" don't do it]