Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #520074
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.conspiracy, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael facing: global collapse then ensued) |
| Date | 2015-09-10 03:07 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <msqs61$gh9$2@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <a_OdnSaFsra7yXPInZ2dnUU7-TOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <msn3d2$pn$1@pcls7.std.com> <r-idnd2Wjvy2hHLInZ2dnUU7-VudnZ2d@giganews.com> <mspqfc$sjq$1@pcls7.std.com> <weadnantNrh4LW3InZ2dnUU7-cudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >Go ahead look it up yourself. What percentage of a building is left behind >after a collapse or a controlled demolition? Let's see. The towers were 95% air when they stood. 1368 feet*.05=68.4 feet. Of course, the mass of the towers won't pack down with no voids in the rubble, and that will increase the height. On the other hand, much of the debris fell outside the footprint of the base of the towers, covering more area, and that will decrease the height of the debris pile. As an approximation, we can say these two effects pretty much cancel and we're left with the original figure of close to 70 feet deep. That's the depth of the bathtub so we'd expect the pile to reach close to street level or the original plaza level. And guess what? That's the level of the debris we see in that picture of all the debris that you keep harping about!
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
#519432
#519443
#519467
#519471
#519530
#519669
#519672
#519684
#519687
#519767
#519771
#519778
#519910
#519986
#520017
#520074
#519773
#519698
#519908
#519717
#519513
#519534
#519605
#519620
#519671
#519676
#519630
#519642
csiph-web