Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #519684
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.conspiracy, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is cartoon blind) |
| Date | 2015-09-08 02:42 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <mslhv1$l2i$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | <NaidneSC87I7U3HInZ2dnUU7-aednZ2d@giganews.com> <msisnk$utl$2@pcls7.std.com> <i4GdnasI4KWGnnDInZ2dnUU7-YGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <mslb8j$jsi$1@pcls7.std.com> <68adnWkld-a4q3PInZ2dnUU7-VWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >news:mslb8j$jsi$1@pcls7.std.com... >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >> >>>astronomy restored >> >> You really need to see a shrink about your obsession with posting to an >> unrelated group. >Funny, I didn't see "newsgroup cop" in your description. You really need to see a shrink about your obsession with posting to an unrelated group. >>>What I've stated over and over and over again is that there was so much >>>radiation the first 3 days that nobody was allowed into GZ in the first 2 >>>days and then only Iron Workers were allowed on the third day and then >>>after >>>that the First Responders still had to wear dosimeter badges and limit >>>their >>>time at GZ. >> >> Liar. They were searching the rubble for survivors almost immediately and >> rescued people the next day. >That is the story that we heard on TV but I never heard about any rescues. Then you weren't paying attention. 11 people were rescued from the debris on the first day. Instead, you chose to believe the lies that the kookmeisters fed you, that it was to radioactive for anyone to go in there. >Plus what I heard from other kooktards, right? >> You claim that only iron workers were allowed in on the third day? WRONG! >> The freaking President of the United States was standing on the Pile on >> the third day, with NO freaking protection at all, not even a hard hat! >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7OCgMPX2mE >Duh. He had to open up the Stock Market so all those people with put >options could get their money. But he did go in there, right? Without any radiation protection, right? This PROVES that you lied, saying that only protected iron workers were allowed in on the third day. Stupid lying kooktard! >Plus I'll bet he didn't go anywhere near the places where the three nukes >were detonated. The whole of Manhattan would be too "hot" for anyone to enter after three days after three nukes were detonated! But since there obviously weren't any nukes at all, Manhattan never was "hot". >> Look at the link I gave you. It shows pieces of WTC7 in the street right >> next to the damaged part of Fiterman Hall. This shows to non-kooktards >> that WTC7 didn't quite collapse neatly into its footprint, and those >> pieces or others that fell into Fiterman Hall did the damage to it. >> https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/df/WTC_Area_With_Building_Numbers_50dpi.png >So, if you look at pictures of Fiterman Hall you do not see debris on it >from WTC7 but the debris was from Fiterman Hall itself and that is easily >explained by the fact it was nuked. More at: There's obvious debris in the street immediately adjacent to the Fiterman Hall damage! Admit it. A chunk of WTC7 fell on Fiterman Hall, collapsing part of it. > (indexed to start at 2:27:07) > http://youtu.be/Lec9giab90I?t=2h27m7s Oh, good grief, is that Dimitri Khalezov guy ever kooktarded! He's even worse than you! I watched a few minutes of that kooktardery, enough to hear this gem: "What happens when it [the nuclear blast wave] hits the air?" "Nothing!" HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Of course, he redefined the nuclear blast wave as a "crushing wave" seconds before. And again, 4 hours and 16 minutes of kooktardery? And how many such multi-hour videos do you have to brainwash yourselves with??
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 18:38 -0500
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-07 00:38 +0000
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-07 02:28 +0000
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is cartoon blind) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 22:25 -0500
Re: Rocky lies some more jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-07 05:57 +0000
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is cartoon blind) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-08 00:48 +0000
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is cartoon blind) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 20:15 -0500
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is cartoon blind) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-08 02:42 +0000
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is still cartoon blind) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 22:23 -0500
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is still cartoon blind) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-08 16:46 +0000
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael facing: global collapse then ensued) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 12:24 -0500
Re: Rocky still deluded jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-08 18:08 +0000
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael facing: global collapse then ensued) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-09 06:41 +0200
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael facing: global collapse then ensued) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-09 17:32 +0000
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael facing: global collapse then ensued) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 17:20 -0500
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael facing: global collapse then ensued) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-10 03:07 +0000
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael runs from the same issue NIST ran from) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 12:39 -0500
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is cartoon blind) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-08 06:41 +0200
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is cartoon blind) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-09 06:11 +0200
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is cartoon blind) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 03:57 -0500
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 06:11 -0500
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (K proves he can not recognize where debris came from) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 08:52 -0500
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (K proves he can not recognize where debris came from) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-07 18:11 +0000
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael fails to address certain issues) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 15:20 -0500
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael fails to address certain issues) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-08 01:06 +0000
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael fails to address certain issues again) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 20:46 -0500
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (2 Michael a better desc) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 16:59 -0500
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (K proves he can not recognize where debris came from) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:43 -0500
csiph-web